DOCSLIB.ORG

H. H. Richardson Historic District of North Easton and Or Common 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
H. H. Richardson Historic District of North Easton and Or Common 2 NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type ali entries complete appiicabie sections_______________ 1. Name historic H. H. Richardson Historic District of North Easton and or common 2. Location street & number North Easton (see continuation sheet) __ not for publication city, town North Easton vicinity of state Massachusetts code county Bristol code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use _XL_ district x public x occupied agriculture __ museum building(s) x private unoccupied __ commercial x park structure _^c_both work in progress educational J£ _ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process x yes: restricted x government scientific being considered - yes: unrestricted __ industrial __ transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name See Continuation Sheet street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Bristol County Registry of Deeds street & number City Hall city, town Taunton state Massachusetts 6. Representation in Existing Surveys__________ title National Register of Historic Places has this property been determined eligible? ——yes ——no date 1972_________________________________ *_ federal __ state __ county __ local depository for survey records National Park Service_________________________________ _ city, town Washington state DC 7. Description Condition Check one Check one .^excellent deteriorated unaltered _J^L original site good ruins w/' altered moved date __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance There are five Richardson buildings in this historic district: the Oliver Ames Free Library, the Oakes Ames Memorial Hall, the Gate Lodge at Langwater, the Gardener's Cottage at Langwater, and the Old Colony Railroad Station. The boundaries encircle the contiguous Library and Memorial Hall, and Rockery in front, the two structures at Langwater, and the third boundary description is for the railroad station. A great deal of the visual impact of North Easton is also due to the genius of the great American landscape architect, Frederick Law Olmsted. The village of North Easton has a collection of works by Henry Hobson Richardson largely due to the patronage of one resident-manufacturing family the Ames. The town depended on this family's manufacture of shovels and tools and was built radiating from the core of factories and railroad station to a ring of workers houses to finally the larger estates on the outer edges. The town today still retains its orderly village aspect. The Richardson Buildings; 1. Oliver Ames Free Library (1877-1883) Although the Library was commissioned in September, 1877, the building did not open until 1883, possibly because of cost overruns. The final cost including the building, the furnishings, the books and investments in a permanent fund, was more than $80,000. A brief description follows: Richardson's design for the Ames Library is basically rectangular in plan with the major rooms, the stack wing, hall, and reading room, arranged longitudinally. A broad gable projects forward from the north end of the longitudinal mass. This gable is marked by the arched entry to the outside porch on the first floor and by a row of five arched windows separated by pairs of short columns supporting the arches on the second. The stack wing windows form a horizontal band, each group of three separated by four short columns. Construction is of warm light brown Milford granite laid in random ashlar with dark reddish brown Longmeadow brownstone trim. The roof is red-orange tile over a wood barrelvaulted stack wing ceiling. The fireplace in the reading room is largely the work of Stanford White. The original stone and present bronze medallions of Oliver Ames II were designed by Augustus Saint-Gaudens. In 1931 the children's wing in red brick was added to the rear, an addition that eliminated the original lavatory and document room. Additional shelv­ ing has been incorporated in the original stack wing to accommodate a greater number of acquisitions.l Originally, the stack wing was divided by an open wooden screen of beaded spindles which was later moved to give free access to the stack shelves. 8. Significance jjafronftl Period Areas of Significance — Check and justify below prehistoric archeology-prehistoric - _ community planning .._.. landscape architecture. _ . religion __ 1400-1499 „_ _ archeology-historic _ ._ conservation .__. law —— science 1500-1599 agriculture _-_ economics _ ._ literature - — sculpture 1600-1699 _X architecture __- education .. _ military _ — social/ __ 1700-1799 _._ art engineering __ music humanitarian _*L 1800-1 899 _ _ commerce - — - exploration/settlement philosophy theater __ . 1900- __ communications ..__- industry politics/government transportation invention other (specify) Specific dates Builder/Architect Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) North Easton, Massachusetts, is the result of an extraordinary collaboration between two of the towering figures of 19th century America. Henry Hobson Richardson, one of this country's greatest architects and Frederick Law Olmsted (1822-1903), the preeminent landscape architect of the era worked together under the patronage of the unusual family that turned a small iron foundry into a shovel manufactory that produced great wealth. In a short eight years this small industrial village became a beautifully coherent planned town containing several of the century's architectural landmarks. The town, itself, is located on the rapid Queset River which supplied waterpower to a series of small mills. In 1803, Oliver Ames moved from Bridgewater and began to manufacture shovels in the factories he built on the banks of the river. In the period of railroad and canal expansion which followed, Ames pro­ spered by supplying digging and trenching equipment. In 1844 his sons Oakes (1804-1873) and Oliver II (1807-1877) assumed management of the company. They also became involved in railroads beginning in 1855, and were major suppliers of trenching tools to the Union Army in the Civil War. Later they helped finance and construct the Union Pacific Railroad. 9 The California Gold Rush brought further business to the shovel factory and enormous profits came to the Ames family. Oakes Ames served in the United States Congress from 1862 until his death in 1873. In 1865 Ames was drawn with his brother Oliver into the Credit Mobilier, a company formed to finance the construction of the Union Pacific Railroad. In the profit taking scandals that ensued, the Ames were embroiled in a factional dispute and, as a result, Oakes Ames career as a politician was over. In retrospect, both Ames brothers were typical businessmen of the 19th century perhaps over zealous, but not corrupt. They were both vindicated and a monument at the highest point on the Union Pacific line was erected to them by the railroad at Sherman Summit, Wyoming. It was designed by Olmsted & Richardson. The children of the two brothers were the patrons of Richardson and Olmsted: Oakes son, Oliver II, who became governor of Massachusetts, gave the Memorial Hall money in memory of of his father and funds for the Library and Oliver's children, Helen Angier Ames and Frederick Lothrop Ames who saw the projects through. F. L. Ames was a Harvard graduate (1854), along with Charles Gambrill, later Richardson's partner. 9. Major Bibliographical References See Continuation Sheet 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property 5.8 _ Quadrangle name Brocton Mass. Quad. Quadrangle scale 1:25,000 UTM References See Continuation Sheet B Mil I I I l LJ l l i I . I Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting North ing cl , I | . I . i I i I.I D| , | | I I I I I , , 1 El i I I .!.. , i , III F| , | I . I i i , , I Gl , I I ill, i . i i i ill H| , | , I , , I l i 1 . 1 Verbal boundary description and justification See Continuation Sheet List all states and counties for properties overlapping state or county boundaries state code county code state code county code 11. Form Prepared By name/title Carolyn Pitts, Historian organization National Park Service, History Division date street & number 1100 L Street, NW telephone (202)343-8166 city or town Washington state DC 20013-7127 12. State Historic Preservation Officer Certification The evaluated significance of this property within the state is: __ national __ state __ local As the designated State Historic Preservation Officer for the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89- 665), I hereby nominate this property for inclusion in the National Register and certify that it has been evaluated according to the criteria and procedures set forth by the National Park Service. State Historic Preservation Officer signature _______________ title date For WPS use only I hereby certify that this property is included in the National Register date Keeper of the National Register Attest* date Chief of Registration NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 <M2) Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form Continuation sheet Item number Page 1 List of Buildings and owners 1. Oliver Ames Free Library 1877-1883) William Ames, President David Ames Free Library Trustees Room 849 Main Street 294 Washington Street North Easton, Massachusetts 02356 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 2. Oakes Ames Memorial Hall (1879-1881) Fred Ames, Chairman Board of Trustees Oakes Ames Memorial Hall Box 34 North Easton, Massachuestts 02356 Rockery (Park in front of Hall) John Kent, Chairman Board of Selectmen, Town of North Easton 02356 3. Gate Lodge of Langwater (1880-1881) 4. Gardener's Cottage of Langwater (1884) Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bowdoin College Catalogues
    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Bowdoin College Catalogues 1-1-1973 Bowdoin College Catalogue (1972-1973) Bowdoin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/course-catalogues Recommended Citation Bowdoin College, "Bowdoin College Catalogue (1972-1973)" (1973). Bowdoin College Catalogues. 254. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/course-catalogues/254 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bowdoin College Catalogues by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOWDOIN COLLEGE BULLETIN CATALOGUE FOR 1972-1973 September 1972 BOWDOIN COLLEGE BULLETIN Catalogue for 1972-1973 BRUNSWICK, MAINE 2 'Wo test with respect to race, color, creed, national origin, or sex shall be imposed in the choice of Trustees, Overseers, officers, members of the Faculty, any other employees, or in the admission ." of students. —By-Laws of Bowdoin College The information in this catalogue was accurate at the time of original publication. The College reserves the right, however, to make changes in its course offerings, degree requirements, regula- tions and procedures, and charges as educational and financial considerations require. BOWDOIN COLLEGE BULLETIN Brunswick, Maine September igy Number 386 This Bulletin is published by Bowdoin College four times during the college year: September, December, March, and June. Second-class postage paid at Brunswick, Maine. CONTENTS COLLEGE
    [Show full text]
  • NE/SAH New England Chapter, Society of Architectural Historians
    NE/SAH New England chapter, Society of Architectural Historians P.O. Box 51284 | Boston, MA 02205 nesah.org December 18, 2020 Tina McCarthy, Preservation Planner Brookline Preservation Commission Via email: [email protected] RE: 25 Cottage Street and 222 Warren Street The New England chapter of the Society of Architectural Historians (NE/SAH) strongly urges the Brookline Preservation Commission to impose a delay on the demolitions of both 25 Cottage Street and 222 Warren Street. As the home and sometimes office of architect Henry Hobson Richardson during the most important part of his too brief career, 25 Cottage Street is of an importance that needs no explanation to the members of your Commission. The role of the house and site in Richardson’s career exactly parallels that of the nearby “Fairsted,” a National Historic Landmark now operated as the Frederick Law Olmsted National Historic Site to interpret the career of Richardson’s sometimes collaborator. In addition, 25 Cottage Street is one of a handful of surviving examples of the rare, so-called Jamaica Planter style of early 19th century summer houses that are almost unique to Brookline – another example being Isabella Stewart Gardner’s Green Hill, which stands between 25 Cottage Street and Fairsted in the Green Hill Historic District. If 25 Cottage Street were in Boston or Cambridge, it would certainly be considered for landmark status; in addition to its individual importance, 25 Cottage Street is identified as a property of “major historical significance” in the Green Hill Historic District. The loss of 25 Cottage Street would have a negative effect on the community’s historic character.
    [Show full text]
  • Lilillliiiiiiiiiiillil COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY of DEEDS
    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE M/v p p n.r» ftn p p -h +: p COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Suffolk INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER DATE (lype all entries — complete applicable sections) ^^Pi^^^^^ffi^SiiMliiii^s»^«^^i^ilSi COMMON: •••'.Trv; ;.fY ', ; O °. • ':'>•.' '. ' "'.M'.'.X; ' -• ."":•:''. Trinity Church "' :: ' ^ "' :; " ' \.'V 1.3 ' AND/OR HISTORIC: Trinity EpisQppa^L Church W&££$ii$$®^^ k®&M$^mmmmmmm:^^ STREET AND NUMBER: Boylston Street, at Coplev Sauare CITY OR TOWN: "Rofiton STATE CODE COUNTY: CODE Ma. ft ft an h n ft P i". t s Snffnlk STATUS ACCESSIBLE CATEGORY OWNERSHIP (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC Q District g] Building d P " D| i c Public Acquisition: ^ Occupied Yes: ., . , | | Restricted Q Site Q Structure H Private D 1" Process a Unoccupied ' — i— i D • i0 Unrestricted Q Object D Both D Being Considered [_J Preservation work in progress ' — ' PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) \ I Agricultural | | Government 1 1 Park I | Transportation 1 1 Comments | | Commercial 1 1 Industrial | | Private Residence I"") Other (Specify) | | Educational 1 1 Military [X] Religious | | Entertainment 1 1 Museum | | Scientific ................. OWNER'S NAME: (/> Reverend Theodore Park Ferris, Rector, Trinity Epsicopal Ch'urch STREET AND NUMBER: CJTY OR TOWN: ' STAT E: 1 CODE Boston 02 II1-! I lassachusetts. , J fillilillliiiiiiiiiiillil COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC: COUNTY: Registry of Deeds, Suffolk County STREET AND NUMBER:
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    CANON: ENGLISH ANTECEDENTS OF THE QUEEN ANNE IN AMERICA 1 ​ ​ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank my thesis advisor Janet W. Foster, adjunct assistant professor, Columbia University, for her endless positivity and guidance throughout the process. We share an appreciation for late nineteenth century American architecture and I feel very grateful to have worked with an advisor who is an expert on the period of time explored in this work. I would also like to thank my readers Jeffrey Karl Ochsner, professor, University of Washington, ​ and Andrew Saint, author, for their time and assistance. Professor Ochsner thank you for your genuine interest in the topic and for contributing your expertise on nineteenth century American architecture, Henry Hobson Richardson and the Sherman house. Andrew thank you for providing an English perspective and for your true appreciation for the “Old English.” You are the expert on Richard Norman Shaw and your insight was invaluable in understanding Shaw’s works. This work would not have come to fruition without the insight and interest of a number of individuals in the topic. Thank you Sarah Bradford Landau for donating many of the books used in this thesis and whose article “Richard Morris Hunt, the Continental Picturesque and the ‘Stick Style’” was part of the inspiration for writing this thesis, and as this work follows where your article concluded. Furthermore, I would like to thank Andrew Dolkart, professor, Columbia University, for your recommendations on books to read and places to see in England, which guided the initial ideas for the thesis. There were many individuals who offered their time, assistance and expertise, thank you to: Paul Bentel, adjunct professor, Columbia University Chip Bohl, architect, Annapolis, Maryland Françoise Bollack, adjunct professor, Columbia University David W.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District Framingham, Massachusetts
    Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District Framingham, Massachusetts Framingham Historic District Commission Community Opportunities Group, Inc. September 2016 Study Report Proposed H. H. Richardson Depot Historic District September 2016 Contents Summary Sheet ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Hearings and Town Meeting ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Background to the Current Proposal ................................................................................................ 5 Local Historic Districts and the Historic Districts Act ................................................................... 6 Local Historic Districts vs. National Register Districts .................................................................. 7 Methodology Statement ........................................................................................................................ 8 Significance Statement ......................................................................................................................... 9 Historical Significance ..................................................................................................................... 9 Architectural Description ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Hobson Richardson Article.9-5
    NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard Henry Hobson Richardson Ever had the unfortunate experience of ordering an “Old-Fashioned” and discovering that the bartender added soda to it? Still, soda water is a necessary additive to many cocktails, where its purpose is to extend the drink and provide that sparkling “fizz”. This process of diluting “short” drinks (such as spirits) makes them “long”, and the presence of carbon dioxide in a cocktail may actually speed up the absorbtion of alcohol into the blood. In southern and tropical colonial areas, the addition of carbonated water to dilute spirits was quite prevalent in hot climates and viewed as a rather “British” habit. This was especially true with gin and the addition of tonic (or Indian tonic water), which is carbonated water with quinine added. And soda water is, after all, the essential ingredient of a multitude of soft drinks, which is what they’re called in New Orleans (as well as “cold drinks”). In the rest of the country, they mostly say “sodas”. All of this would not have been possible without the fertile scientific mind of Joseph Priestley (1733 – 1804) who invented soda water in 1767 by discovering a means of infusing water with carbon dioxide at a brewery in Leeds, England. The “fixed air” (carbon dioxide gas) blanketing the fermenting beer was known to kill mice, but Priestley found that (by impregnating the water with this “fixed air”) he had created a pleasant tasting and refreshing beverage. He produced the “fixed air” by dripping sulfuric acid onto chalk, which he encouraged to dissolve into an agitated bowl of water.
    [Show full text]
  • My Dear Mrs. Ames : a Study of the Life of Suffragist Cartoonist and Birth Control Reformer Blanche Ames Ames, 1878-1969
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 My dear Mrs. Ames : a study of the life of suffragist cartoonist and birth control reformer Blanche Ames Ames, 1878-1969. Anne Biller Clark University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Clark, Anne Biller, "My dear Mrs. Ames : a study of the life of suffragist cartoonist and birth control reformer Blanche Ames Ames, 1878-1969." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1228. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1228 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MY DEAR MRS. AMES: A STUDY OF THE LIFE OF SUFFRAGIST CARTOONIST AND BIRTH CONTROL REFORMER BLANCHE AMES AMES, 1878-1969 A Dissertation Presented by ANNE BILLER CLARK Amherst in Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 1996 History © Copyright by Anne Biller Clark 1996 All Rights Reserved MY DEAR MRS AMES; A STUDY OF THE LIFE OF SUFFRAGIST CARTOONIST AND BIRTH CONTROL REFORMER BLANCHE AMES AMES 1878-1969 A Dissertation Presented by ANNE BILLER CLARK Approved as to style and content by im'ce Berkman, Chair Margo Culle?y. Member David Glassberg, Menw^ Kathy Peiss, Member Bruce Laurie, Department Head History Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the staff of the Sophia Smith Collection for their valuable assistance and unfailing courtesy during the research stage of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The 150 Favorite Pieces of American Architecture
    The 150 favorite pieces of American architecture, according to the public poll “America’s Favorite Architecture” conducted by The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and Harris Interactive, are as follows. For more details on the winners, visit www.aia150.org. Rank Building Architect 1 Empire State Building - New York City William Lamb, Shreve, Lamb & Harmon 2 The White House - Washington, D.C. James Hoban 3 Washington National Cathedral - Washington, D.C. George F. Bodley and Henry Vaughan, FAIA 4 Thomas Jefferson Memorial - Washington D.C. John Russell Pope, FAIA 5 Golden Gate Bridge - San Francisco Irving F. Morrow and Gertrude C. Morrow 6 U.S. Capitol - Washington, D.C. William Thornton, Benjamin Henry Latrobe, Charles Bulfinch, Thomas U. Walter FAIA, Montgomery C. Meigs 7 Lincoln Memorial - Washington, D.C. Henry Bacon, FAIA 8 Biltmore Estate (Vanderbilt Residence) - Asheville, NC Richard Morris Hunt, FAIA 9 Chrysler Building - New York City William Van Alen, FAIA 10 Vietnam Veterans Memorial - Washington, D.C. Maya Lin with Cooper-Lecky Partnership 11 St. Patrick’s Cathedral - New York City James Renwick, FAIA 12 Washington Monument - Washington, D.C. Robert Mills 13 Grand Central Station - New York City Reed and Stern; Warren and Wetmore 14 The Gateway Arch - St. Louis Eero Saarinen, FAIA 15 Supreme Court of the United States - Washington, D.C. Cass Gilbert, FAIA 16 St. Regis Hotel - New York City Trowbridge & Livingston 17 Metropolitan Museum of Art – New York City Calvert Vaux, FAIA; McKim, Mead & White; Richard Morris Hunt, FAIA; Kevin Roche, FAIA; John Dinkeloo, FAIA 18 Hotel Del Coronado - San Diego James Reid, FAIA 19 World Trade Center - New York City Minoru Yamasaki, FAIA; Antonio Brittiochi; Emery Roth & Sons 20 Brooklyn Bridge - New York City John Augustus Roebling 21 Philadelphia City Hall - Philadelphia John McArthur Jr., FAIA 22 Bellagio Hotel and Casino - Las Vegas Deruyter Butler; Atlandia Design 23 Cathedral of St.
    [Show full text]
  • B U L L E T I N Preserving Landscapes
    BULLETIN Volume 10: No. 6 Cultural Resources Management • A National Park Service Technical Bulletin December 1987 Preserving Landscapes Rural Landscapes Definitions Hugh C. Miller Cultural Landscape. A geographic area, including both cultural and natural resources, including the Why is what happens today at During a recent travel exchange wildlife or domestic animals therein, Antietam Battlefield important to sponsored by the Sir Herbert Man- that has been influenced by or reflects the English at Battle Abbey zoni Scholarship Trust of Birm­ human activity or was the background (Hastings 1066)? Why is what hap­ ingham, England, I found that we for an event or person significant in pened at the village of Longnor in can learn from each other and find human history. There are five general the Peak District National Park im­ answers together about rural land­ kinds of cultural landscapes, not portant to the village of Everett at scape preservation. I came to mutually exclusive: the Cuyahoga Valley National Rec­ realize that there are many lessons Historic scene. A micro-environment reation Area? These areas are we can learn from the English where a significant historic event oc­ worlds apart in terms of time and system of managing parks. From curred, frequently with associated space and yet the management and us, they could learn how we have structures or other tangible remains. protection of the countryside in na­ developed methods for identifica­ In historic areas, such remains often tional parks and historic sites in tion of historic landscape values are the most significant physical England have a lot in common with that have become the basis for resource of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • AMES MONUMENT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 AMES MONUMENT Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Ames Monument Other Name/Site Number: N/A 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 2 miles south of the intersection of Interstate 80 and Albany Not for publication: County Road 234 (Monument Road) (NE ¼ NW ¼, Section 6, T. 13, N. R.71, W. of 6th P.M.) City/Town: Laramie Vicinity: X State: Wyoming County: Albany Code: 001 Zip Code: 82052 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): ___ Public-Local: District: ___ Public-State: _X Site: ___ Public-Federal: ___ Structure: _X_ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites 1 2 structures objects 1 2 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A DRAFT NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 AMES MONUMENT Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report Olmsted-Richardson Thematic Local Historic District Brookline, Massachusetts
    Study Report Olmsted-Richardson Thematic Local Historic District Brookline, Massachusetts Author-contributors Jeffrey Ochsner, Dennis De Witt, Hugh Howard, Francis Kowsky, Alan Banks, Lauren Meier, and Arleyn Levee Edited by Jean Woy with Tina McCarthy, Brookline Preservation Planner Brookline Preservation Commission, Department of Planning and Community Development November 2021 SUMMARY SHEET Contact Person: Tina McCarthy, Preservation Planner Town of Brookline, Planning Department [email protected] 617-730-2612 Study Committee: Brookline Preservation Commission Members Elton Elperin, Chair Richard Panciera, Vice Chair James Batchelor Wendy Ecker David Jack Peter Kleiner David King Alternates Elizabeth Armstrong John Spiers Alex Villanueva Date of Public Hearing: xxxxxxxxxx Date of Town Meeting: Begins Tuesday, November 16th, 2021 Total Number of Properties/sites in Proposed LHD: Five Cover photos: 25 Cottage Street (upper) and 222 Warren Street (lower) 2 Contents About Local Historic Districts 4 Adoption and Submission of this Study Report by the Preservation Commission 4 The Proposed Olmsted-Richardson Local Historic District — Sites Included 5 Executive Summary 6 Olmsted-Richardson Local Historic District — A Thematic LHD 7 Richardson and the Olmsteds: Their Work and Homes 7 25 Cottage Street Before Richardson’s 1874 Arrival 7 Nearby Related Houses 8 Perkins-Hooper-Richardson House 9 Henry Hobson Richardson and His Practice at 25 Cottage Street 10 Richardson before Brookline 10 Richardson’s Home and Practice in Brookline 11
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMES FAMILY of Easton., Jmassachusetts
    THE AMES FAMILY of Easton., JMassachusetts BY WINTHROP AMES PRIVATELY PRINTED 1938 THE AMES FAMILY of easton,, .5Massachusetts A QUITE UNNECESSARY PREFACE HIS LITTLE BOOK (AND STILL, PERHAPS, TOO LONG AT T that) has been written for my daughters, my brother and sister, and my favorite cousins, nephews and nieces of the Easton branch of the Ames family - and for them only. It is too personal a story to interest outsiders. To the members of my own generation I make no ex­ cuse for it. We have grown old enough to learn that our forebears still live on in us; that we owe most of our qual­ ities, aptitudes and weaknesses to them as truly as we do the color of our eyes or the shapes of our noses. They molded our characters by tradition and example. They speak to us daily from the fields they tilled, the shops, homes and memorials they built and the trees tLey planted. But to the youngsters, now so eagerly peering forward into the future that they are impatient of things past, I shall also give this book. Some day when they come to realize that they too are only ancestors, leading their children by the hand, as their parents led them, into the brief spotlight we call life, and then bidding them good-bye as these children will ag~in lead and bid good-bye to others, they may care to glance back at a few of the folk who marched before in the same endless procession. One of my daughters came back from school the other day full of scorn for history because it was only about "old dead people fighting." I should agree, my dear, if by V "fighting" you mean merely military battles, most of which have left no durable result and only clogged the march of human progress.
    [Show full text]