DOCSLIB.ORG

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF WATER MASSES OFF TIlE OREGON COAST by DONALD HUDSON ROSENBERG A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1962 Redacted for Privacy Associate Professor of Oceanography In Charge of Major Redacted for Privacy irmapof Department of Oceanography Redacted for Privacy Chairman of Sc Graduate Committee Redacted for Privacy Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented A/ 3. /2. Typed by Diane Frisehknecht CHARACfERISTICS ANDDISTRIBUTION OF WATER MASSESOFF THE OREGON COAST by Donald Hudson Rosenberg TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.;................................................. General Description of Water Masses, Currents, and UpwellingintheNorthPacificOcean........................... 5 Water Masses............................................... 5 Subarctic Water....................................... 5 Eastern North Pacific central Water................... 7 Pacific Equatorial Water.............................. 7 North Pacific Intermediate Water...................... 7 currents................................................... 8 Gulf of Alaska Current System......................... 8 California CurrentSystem............................. 8 Davidson Current...................................... 10 Deep Currents......................................... 11 Upwelling....................... 11 TheWaterMasses off the OregonCoast................ 12 Method of Analysis......................................... 12 Hydrograpic Stations ...................................... 16 Physical Characteristics and Distribution of OffshoreWaterMasses..................................... .20 Seas ona 1 Va r ia t ion................................ .......27 Sources of Observed Distribution............................... 36 Summary.Bib1ioraphy. Ll.O 42 Appendix ....................................................... 144 Sources of Data ............................................ 45 TABLES 1.Stations Used in Water Mass Analysis....................... 17 FIGURES 1. Section off Cape Blarico, Oregon, showing percentage of Subarctic Water. (12, p. 119)......................... 2 2. Section off Cascade Head, Oregon, showing percentage of Subarctic Water. (12, p. 119)......................... 3 3. Water masses of the North Pacific Ocean................... 6 4. Surface currents of the North Pacific Ocean............... 9 5. Temperature-salinity curves for California, Oregon, and Washington waters.....................................13 6. Watermassanalysis diagram...............................15 7. Position of stations off the Oregon coast.................19 8. NORPAC section of f Oregon showing percentage of Subarctic Water. August 1955.............................21 9. Deviation of temperature from average. Stippled area represents positive deviation. August 1955...............23 10. Deviation of salinity from average. Stippled area represents positive deviation. August 1955......... .....24 11. August 1949 section off Newport, Oregon, showing percentageofsubarcticWater .............................25 12. August 1961 section off Newport, Oregon, showing percentageofSubarcticWater ...........................26 13. June 1961 section off Astoria, Oregon, showing percentageofSubarcticwater .............................28 111.. June 1961 section off Newport, Oregon, showing percentage of Subarctic Water.............................29 15. June 1961 section off Coos Bay, Oregon, showing percentage of Subarctic Water .............................30 16. October 1961 section off Newport, Oregon, showing percentage of Subarctic Water .............................31 17. December 1961 section off Newport, Oregon, showing pereentageofSubareticWater .............................32 18. Variation in percentage of Subarctic Water for 19k9 at Marine Life Research Program station 2014..... .......... 34 19. Variation in percentage of Subarctic Water for 1949 at Marine Life Research Program station 201 ............... 35 CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF WATER MASSES OFF THEOREGON COAST The first extensive evaluation of water masses off the Oregon coast was done in 19141 when Richard Tibby studied eighty hydrographic stations off the western coast of North America which had been occupied by the"E. W.Scripps" during 1939. Tibby found that "a series of temperature-salinity curves from stations located at various points from the Gulf of Alaska to Central America show a regular transition in the character of the water masses from north to south and clearly indicate that the water along the entire coast is a mix- ture of two extreme water masses." (12, p. 112) These specific water masses were identified as Pacific Equatorial Water and Pacific Sub- arctic Water. (12, p. 112) Tibby analyzed each hydrographic station for the percentage of Equatorial Water present. This method of separating the water struc- ture at a given station into component parts was introduced byH. U. Sverdrup and R. Fleming who used and described the methodin their report on the results of the 1937 "Bluefin" cruises off Southern California. (10, p. 290) Tibby constructed a total of six vertical sections,two of which lie off the Oregon coast. The two sections off Oregon are shownas Figures 1 and 2. Tibby's figures originally represented themixture in terms of percentage of Equatorial Water. The reproduced figures STA TI ON S 36 37 38 39 40 41 . S S 200 <70 . S. SS S S (1) 400 . S Ui 70TN. I I- 600 S >70 S S S LU 800 - S 60 I000- I I I I I FIGURE 1. percentageSectionKILOMETERS off of Cape SubarcticFROM 300Blanco, SHORE Water. Oregon,200 (12, showing p. 119)100 STATIONS 32 31 30 29 28 27 34 33 S S 70 S S.<70 Iii(I) 400 600 >70 SI SS 0wa.I-. 70 600 500 KILOMETERS400 FROM300 SHORE200 00 FIGURE 2. ofSection Subarctic off CascadeWater. (12,Read, p. Oregon, 119) showing percentage show the mixture as the percentage of Subarctic Water. Percentage of Equatorial Water equals 100 minus percentage of Subarctic Water. Substantially more data have become available since 1939, but no comparable or more comprehensive recent work has been done on the water masses if this region. This paper is an expansion and extension of the work done by Tibby, concentrating the analysis on the water off the Oregon coast and including many more deep stations than were available to Tibby.A seasonal analysis showing the changes of the water masses by season is also included. In 191i9 and 1950 the Marine Life Research Program of Scripps Institution of Oceanography included several series of stations off the Oregon coast. The NORPAC data include stations off the coast taken in 1955 by Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Additional individual cruises have been made in Oregon waters. However, even with this increased interest in oceanography, by 1958 there were only about 375 hydrographic stations out to a distance of 500 kilometers off the whole Oregon coast. Mr. Joseph Reid, in charge of the Marine Life Research Program (hereafter called MLR), has analyzed the MLR data for temperature, salinity, and oxygen distribution but has not carried out any water mass analysis. (7, p. 31i47) In June, 1958, the Department of Oceanography at Oregon State University initiated a series of regular hydrographic stations of f Oregon. However, it was not until June, 1961, with the use of the "R/V Acona," that the hydrographic stationswere extended sufficiently, I 5 both in depth and in distance from shore, that they could be used in this study. GENERAL DESCRIPTION 9 WATER MASSES, CURRENTS, A UPWELLING IN THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN The Oregon waters exist as part of the North Pacific circulation system, and the local water masses can only be understood in the context of the water structure in the entire Eastern North Pacific. To understand and describe the water masses and the processes effecting change and variability in the waters of f the Oregon coast, it is necessary to first describe the general pattern of water masses, cir- culation, and structure in the North Pacific. Water Masses Sverdrup et al have identified five different watermasses in the North Pacific. These are the Pacific Equatorial, Eastern North Pacific Central, Western North Pacific Central, Pacific Subarctic, and North Pacific Intermediate. (9, p. 7k1) The locations of the first four, which are found at the surface,are shown in Figure 3. This classification was made by grouping and analysisof the available temperature-salinity curves for the North Pacific. The following brief summary of distribution and properties is limitedto the water masses which effect the area of study. Subarctic Water. Subarctic Water extends over the entire North Pacific at latitudes north of l.5°N. Sverdrup extended this classifi- cation to water south of 14.5°N along the NorthAmerican coast but for ISUAfQCTIC PCIFlC+I . ///// / /////,//WTEP // - /-1'/ /7- ESTE\CENTkAL WATERPCIFC /'JEASTEPN PACIFIC WATER I____ FIGURE 3. Water(adapted masses from of9, thep. 740)North Pacific Ocean. 7 purposes of differentiation in this paper the coastal water will be referred to as the Transition Zone. Subarctic Water is characterized by temperatures between 2° and 14° C and salinities 88 low as 32 0/00 at the surface increasing to 34 o/oo at 300 meters and then slowly increasing to 34.65 o/oo at the bottom. (9, p. 712) There is no subsurface salinity minimum in, the Subarctic Water. Eastern North Pacific Central Water. Between the hawaiian Islands and the Transition Zone lies the Eastern North Pacific Central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robocza Wersja Wykazu Polskich Nazw Geograficznych Świata © Copyright by Główny Geodeta Kraju 2013
    Robocza wersja wykazu polskich nazw geograficznych świata W wykazie uwzględnione zostały wyłącznie te obiekty geograficzne, dla których Komisja Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych poza Granicami Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej zaleca stosowanie polskich nazw (tj. egzonimów lub pseudoegzonimów). Robocza wersja wykazu zawiera zalecane polskie nazwy wg stanu na 13 lutego 2013 r. – do czasu ostatecznej publikacji lista tych nazw może ulec niewielkim zmianom. Układ wykazu bazuje na układzie zastosowanym w zeszytach „Nazewnictwa geograficznego świata”. Wykaz podzielono na części odpowiadające częściom świata (Europa, Azja, Afryka, Ameryka Północna, Ameryka Południowa, Australia i Oceania, Antarktyka, formy podmorskie). Każda z części rozpoczyna się listą zalecanych nazw oceanów oraz wielkich regionów, które swym zasięgiem przekraczają z reguły powierzchnie kilku krajów. Następnie zamieszczono nazwy według państw i terytoriów. Z kolei nazwy poszczególnych obiektów geograficznych ułożono z podziałem na kategorie obiektów. W ramach poszczególnych kategorii nazwy ułożono alfabetycznie w szyku właściwym (prostym). Hasła odnoszące się do poszczególnych obiektów geograficznych zawierają zalecaną nazwę polską, a następnie nazwę oryginalną, w języku urzędowym (endonim) – lub nazwy oryginalne, jeśli obowiązuje więcej niż jeden język urzędowy albo dany obiekt ma ustalone nazwy w kilku językach. Jeżeli podawane są polskie nazwy wariantowe (np. Mała Syrta; Zatoka Kabiska), to nazwa pierwsza w kolejności jest tą, którą Komisja uważa za właściwszą, uznając jednak pozostałe za dopuszczalne (wyjątek stanowią tu długie (oficjalne) nazwy niektórych jednostek administracyjnych). Czasem podawana jest tylko polska nazwa – oznacza to, że dany obiekt geograficzny nie jest nazywany w kraju, w którym jest położony lub nie odnaleziono poprawnej lokalnej nazwy tego obiektu. W przypadku nazw wariantowych w językach urzędowych na pierwszym miejscu podawano nazwę główną danego obiektu. Dla niektórych obiektów podano także, w nawiasie na końcu hasła, bardziej znane polskie nazwy historyczne.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Environmental Information for the Unimak Pass Area, Alaska
    EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FOR THE UNIMAK PASS AREA, ALASKA Edited by Joe C. Truett and Peter C. Craig LGL Ecological Research Associates, Inc. 1410 Cavitt Street Bryan, Texas 77801 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 677 December 1986 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was funded by the Minerals Management Service, Department of the Interior, through an Interagency Agreement with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce, as part of the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program. The financial support of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the Department of the Interior is gratefully acknowledged. Individuals of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the Depart- ment of Commerce in Anchorage, Alaska, were extremely supportive through- out the preparation of this report. Paul Becker, NOAA’s contracting officer’s technical representative, was particularly helpful and understanding; his support is very much appreciated. During this project, contact was made with a large number of scientists wh O provided information and interpretations that have benefited this report. We would specifically like to acknowledge the contributions of: Paul Anderson, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Richard Bakkala, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center (NWAFC) Jim Blackburn, Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) Richard Dugdale, University of Southern California Kathy Frost, ADFG Steve Hoag, International Pacific Halibut Commission Pat Holmes, ADFG John Kelly, University of Alaska Larry Malloy, ADFG Bob Otto, NMFS Sherry Pearson, NMFS Lael Ronholt, NWAFC James Schumacher, NOAA Pacific Marine and Environmental Lab Arnie Shaul, ADFG Art Sowls, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Marilyn Dahlheim, NMFS Anthony DeGange, USFWS Doug Forsell, USFWS 3 TABLE Ol? CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT S .
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Geographical Names of Undersea and Antarctic Features the Names Which “Escape” the Definition of Exonym and Endonym
    UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES 10th Meeting of the UNGEGN Working Group on Exonyms Tainach, Austria, 28-30 April 2010 Polish geographical names of undersea and Antarctic features The names which “escape” the definition of exonym and endonym Prepared by Maciej Zych, Commission on Standardization of Geographical Names Outside the Republic of Poland Polish geographical names of undersea and Antarctic features The names which “escape” the definition of exonym and endonym According to the definition of exonym adopted by UNGEGN in 2007 at the Ninth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names, it is a name used in a specific language for a geographical feature situated outside the area where that language is widely spoken, and differing in its form from the respective endonym(s) in the area where the geographical feature is situated. At the same time the definition of endonym was adopted, according to which it is a name of a geographical feature in an official or well-established language occurring in that area where the feature is situated1. So formulated definitions of exonym and endonym do not cover a whole range of geographical names and, at the same time, in many cases they introduce ambiguity when classifying a given name as an exonym or an endonym. The ambiguity in classifying certain names as exonyms or endonyms derives from the introduction to the definition of the notion of the well-established language, which can be understood in different ways. Is the well-established language a
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System: Geographic
    ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) AQUATIC SCIENCES AND FISHERIES INFORMATION SYSTEM GEOGRAPHIC AUTHORITY LIST ASFIS REFERENCE SERIES, No. 7 Revision 3 ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) AQUATIC SCIENCES AND FISHERIES INFORMATION SYSTEM GEOGRAPHIC AUTHORITY LIST edited by David S Moulder Plymouth Marine Laboratory Plymouth, United Kingdom revised by Ian Pettman and Hardy Schwamm Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside, Cumbria, United Kingdom Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Aquatic sciences and fisheries information system. Geographic authority list. ASFIS-7 (Rev. 3) Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-131173-8 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Pacific Euphausiids
    UC San Diego Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Title The distribution of Pacific euphausiids Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6db5n157 Author Brinton, Edward Publication Date 1962-11-12 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE DISTRIBUTION OF PACIFIC EUPHAUSIIDS BY EDWARD BRINTON BULLETIN OF THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA Volume 8, Mo. 2, pp. 21–270, 126 figures in text UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1962 THE DISTRIBUTION OF PACIFIC EUPHAUSIIDS BY EDWARD BRINTON UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1962 BULLETIN OF THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA EDITORS: D. L. FOX, G. O. S. ARRHENIUS, F. B. PHLEGER Volume 8, No. 2, pp. 51–270, 126 figures in text Submitted by editors November 8, 1961 Issued November 12, 1962 Price, $5.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND [CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, NEW SERIES] PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS Summary 51 Introduction 53 Acknowledgments 53 Previous Studies 54 The vertical ranges 57 Methods of Collection and Analysis 58 Hydrography 62 Explanation of Figures 73 Distributions of the Euphausiid Species 75 The Genus Bentheuphausia 75 The Genus Thysanopoda 77 The Genus Nyctiphanes 103 The Genus Pseudeuphausia 107 The Genus Euphausia 108 The Genus Thysanoessa 137 The Genus Tessarabrachion 151 The Genus Nemataoscelis 152 The Genus Nematobrachion 160 The Genus Stylocheiron 164 Differentiation in Stylocheiron affine Hansen and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelagic Birds Observed on a North Pacific Crossing
    May, 1958 1.59 PELAGIC BIRDS OBSERVED ON A NORTH PACIFIC CROSSING By WILLIAM J. HAMILTON III Kuroda ( 1955) recently demonstrated the inadequacy of our knowledge of the diu tribution of pelagic birds of the North Pacific Ocean by collecting three species of shearwaters new to the western North Pacific. Other reports of precise distributional data for pelagic North Pacific birds away from the coasts include Arnold’s (1948) rec- ord of birds seen from a destroyer in the Aleutian area and Yocom’s (1947) and Thomp- son’s (1951) reports on the behavior and distribution of Black-footed Albatrosses (Diomedea &gripes) between San Francisco and Hawaii. In June, 1955, I crossedthe North Pacific on a troopship along the course shown in figure 1. The ship maintained a nearly constant speed of 16 knots ( 18.4 mph). Table 1 lists the daily position of the ship at noon, the height of waves, and air and water tem- peratures. The International Date Line was crossedon June 8. For the sake of clarity, June 8, west of the date line, has been designated June 8 W, and June 8, east of the date line, June 8 E. Four hours of observations were made daily from a lower deck on the north side of the ship. Alexander’s book (1928) was used in making identifications. The number of individuals of the commonest speciesseen and identified is recorded in table 2. All figures represent cumulative daily totals except those for the albatrosses. Figures for the albatrosses indicate the maximum number following the ship at any one time during the observation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanography Currents Geography Notes on Ocean Currents, Cold and Warm Currents- Examrace
    9/27/2021 Competitive Exams: Oceanography Currents Geography Notes on Ocean Currents, Cold and Warm Currents- Examrace Examrace Competitive Exams: Oceanography Currents Geography Notes on Ocean Currents, Cold and Warm Currents Doorsteptutor material for competitive exams is prepared by world's top subject experts: get questions, notes, tests, video lectures and more- for all subjects of your exam. Get video tutorials on geography @ Youtube Examrace Channel Ocean Currents Atlantic Ocean Warm Currents North Equatorial Current: it is formed between equator and N latitude. It has two branches Antilles, is diverted northwards and flows to the east of West Indies island and helps in the formation of Sargasso sea (which is between N. latitude) . Sargasso seaiia& maximum salinity in Atlantic and mean temperature is ; Caribbean current enters Gulf of Mexico and becomes Gulf Stream. South Equatorial Current: it is latitude from the equator. It basically originated under the stress of the trade wind. Counter Equatorial Current: it flows from west to east, also called Guinea stream or Compensation current. Gulf Stream: originates in Gulf of Mexico, around latitude. It has three branches Florida Current, the average temp, of water at its surface is or F, while salinity is 36 % . At N latitude, its temperature falls upto or ; Gulf Stream, was first discovered by PoncedeLeon in 1513. The Florida Current after having water of Antilles current is known as Gulf Stream beyond Cape Hatteras (Near Washington) ; North Atlantic Drift or Current, latitude and W longitude, the Gulf Stream is divided into many branches. All the branches are collectively called North Atlantic Drift/Current.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 36 Ocean Currents
    CHAPTER 36 OCEAN CURRENTS TYPES AND CAUSES OF CURRENTS 3600. Definitions The movement of ocean water is one of the two principal sources of discrepancy between dead reckoned and actual positions of vessels (the other source is the wind). Water in motion is called a current; the direction toward which it moves is called set, and its speed is called drift. Modern shipping speeds have lessened the impact of currents on a typical voyage, and since electronic Figure 3600. NOAA’s National Center for Environmental navigation allows continuous adjustment of course, there is Information (NCEI) formerly the National Ocean Data less need to estimate current set and drift before setting the Center (NODC). course to be steered. Nevertheless, a knowledge of ocean https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/General/current.html currents can be used in cruise planning to reduce transit times, and current models are an integral part of ship 3601. Causes of Ocean Currents routing systems. Oceanographers have developed a number of methods The primary generating forces of ocean currents are of classifying currents in order to facilitate descriptions of wind and differences in water density caused by variations their physics and geography. Currents may be referred to in heat and salinity. Currents generated by these forces are according to their forcing mechanism as either wind driven modified by such factors as depth of water, underwater or thermohaline. Alternatively, they may be classified topography (including shape of the basin in which the according to their depth (surface, intermediate, deep or current is running), extent &location of land and deflection bottom).
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Masses and Currents of the Oceans Within Anygiven Region, the Character of the Water Massesdepends Mainly Upon Three F
    . CHAPTERXV The Water Masses and Currents of the Oceans `.m. mm.. ms .......m .......m* ....m..*.. m.....* ....................mm... *. .. ........ .......m..m. ..... ........ Within anygiven region, the character of the water masses depends mainly upon three fac$ors—the latitude of the region, the degree of isolation, and the types of currents-the relative importance of which will be brought out in the course of the discussion. It is rational to deal first with the simpler conditions and gradually to enter upon the more complicated. This can be done by first dis- cussing the Antarctic Ocean, where the latitude effect is easily explained, where the waters are in free communication with those of the major oceans, and where the system of prevailing currents is unusually clear- cut. After a description of conditions within the Antarctic Ocean we shall consider the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans, the adjacent seas of these oceans, and in conclusion we shall discuss the deep-water circulation between the large ocean basins. The Antarctic Circumpolar Ocean BOUNDARIESANDGENERALCHARACTERISTICSOF WATER MASSES. It is difficult to assign a northern boundary to the Antarctic Ocean because it is in open communication with the three major oceans: the Atlantic, the Indian, and the Pacific Oceans. In some instances the antarctic waters are dealt with as parts of the adjacent oceans and are designated the Atlantic Antarctic Ocean, or the Indian or Pacific Ant- arctic Ocean, whereas in other instances the antarctic waters must be considered an integral part of all oceans. The latter case, for instance, applies when dealing with the deep-water circulation, which is of such a nature that the intercommunication between dif?erent regions must be taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Currents of World Oceans and There Effect on Climate and Weather
    International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research IJETSR www.ijetsr.com ISSN 2394 – 3386 Volume 4, Issue 11 November 2017 Currents of World Oceans and there Effect on Climate and Weather Gursharn Singh (M.SC. GEOGRAPHY,M.A. ENGLISH) Department of geography, University of Jammu, India The ocean is a very complex system and it is never at rest. Ocean currents travel around the planet and go through a lot of ups and a lot of downs along their journey. Because ocean waters are so good at holding heat and because the currents are constantly circulating massive amounts of water, oceans are major players in any discussion on global climate. In this lesson, you will learn about the patterns ocean currents take and how they affect climate. Ocean currents travel at both the surface of the ocean, as well as deep within the ocean basin. Currents are influenced by factors such as wind, the rotation of the earth, differences in the water's salt content, temperature and density, and even the shape of the ocean floor. The ocean waters are always in motion and as they travel around the globe they carry and distribute heat, which affects the global climate. INTRODUCTION Mass flows of water, or currents, are essential to understanding how heat energy moves between the Earth’s water bodies, landmasses, and atmosphere. The ocean covers 71 percent of the planet and holds 97 percent of its water, making the ocean a key factor in the storage and transfer of heat energy across the globe. The movement of this heat through local and global ocean currents affects the regulation of local weather conditions and temperature extremes, stabilization of global climate patterns, cycling of gases, and delivery of nutrients and larva to marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OCEAN CURRENTS by Prof A. Balasubramanian Objectives: After
    THE OCEAN CURRENTS By Prof A. Balasubramanian Objectives: After attending this lesson, the user would be able to describe the properties of ocean currents, their orgin and distribution in various oceans of the globe. The details of ocean water circulation, their mixing and the role played by various factors in controlling the surface and deep ocean currents will also be known. Introduction Seas and Oceans are dynamic ecosystems. Oceans are very vast bodies of water representing a major portion of the hydrosphere. Air-sea interface is an interactive interface. The wind blowing on the surface of the ocean has the greatest effect on the movement of surface water. The sunlight falling on the ocean surface has a very significant impact on the temperature of the sea water. These factors induce the oceanic water masses to move and circulate. Both Vertical and horizontal movement of both surface and deep water masses happen in the world’s oceans. They are called as Ocean currents. The Ocean water circulation is an important aspect of study in oceanography. We need to understand the oceanic currents, waves and tides and their distribution on the globe. This lesson is focused to learn about ocean water currents. Measurement of Ocean Currents When Benjamin Franklin, was a postmaster in the American colonies. In his time, all the letters and postal packages were transported across the continents through oceans by boats. He heard some complaints in 1769 that the mail boat from North America which went to Europe reached much faster than the mail boat which was traveling in the opposite direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Oceanography
    Scientific Journal PACIFIC OCEANOGRAPHY Volume 1, Number 2 2003 FAR EASTERN REGIONAL HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Russian Federal Service For Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring (ROSHYDROMET) http://po.hydromet.com Editor-in-Chief Dr. Yuriy N. Volkov FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia / Email: [email protected] Editor Dr. Igor E. Kochergin FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia / Email: [email protected] Editor Dr. Mikhail A. Danchenkov FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia / Email: [email protected] Executive Secretary Mrs. Elena S. Borozdinova FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia / Email: [email protected] Editorial Board D.G. Aubrey (Woods Hole Group, Falmouth, USA) Yu.A. Mikishin (FESU, Vladivostok, Russia) T.A. Belan (FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia) J.E. O’Reilly (Exxon/Mobil, Houston, USA) G.H. Hong (KORDI, Ansan, Republic of Korea) Y.D. Resnyansky (Hydrometcenter of RF, Moscow, Russia) J.H. Yoon (RIAM, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) S.C. Riser (University of Washington, Seattle, USA) E.V. Karasev (FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia) M. Takematsu (RIAM, Kyushu University (retired), Fukuoka, Japan) K. Kim (Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea) A.V. Tkalin (FERHRI, Vladivostok, Russia) V.B. Lobanov (POI FEBRAS, Vladivostok, Russia) S.M. Varlamov (RIAM, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) Secretariat contact: Elena Borozdinova, Pacific Oceanography, FERHRI, 24, Fontannaya Street, Vladivostok 690990, Russia Email: [email protected] Home page: http://po.hydromet.com Tel: +7 (4232) 267352 Fax: +7 (4232) 269281 “Pacific Oceanography” registered with the Russian Ministry of Mass Media, Reg. No. 77–12296, 2 April 2002 PUBLISHED BY: Far Eastern Regional Hydrometeorological Research Institute (FERHRI), 24, Fontannaya Street, Vladivostok 690990, Russia Email: [email protected] Home page: http://www.hydromet.com PRINTED AND BOUND IN: Dalnauka Press, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science, 7, Radio Street, Vladivostok 690041, Russia (Order no.
    [Show full text]