DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT 2021 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT 2021 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan DRAFT Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Caltrans AUGUST 2021 ACCESSIBILITY ASSISTANCE Caltrans makes every attempt to ensure our documents are accessible. Due to variances between assistive technologies, there may be portions of this document which are not accessible. Where documents cannot be made accessible, we are committed to providing alternative access to the content. Should you need additional assistance, please contact us at [email protected] or visit https://dot.ca.gov/request- ada-compliant-documents. For individuals with disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, audiocassette, or computer disc. It is also available in alternative languages. To obtain a copy in one of these formats, please email us at [email protected] or call (916) 654-2397, TTY: 711. The Plan is also available online at https://dot.ca.gov/programs/legislative- affairs/reports. Caltrans® and the Caltrans logo are registered service marks of the California Department of Transportation and may not be copied, distributed, displayed, reproduced or transmitted in any form without prior written permission from the California Department of Transportation. © 2021 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved i – Table of Contents Gavin C Newsom Governor State of California David S Kim Secretary California State Transportation Agency Toks Omishakin Director California Department of Transportation Mike Keever Chief Deputy Director California Department of Transportation ii – Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document would not have been possible without the contributions of many people, past and present, from department staff and managers, and partner agencies, to California tribal governments, key stakeholders, advocacy organizations, and the public at large. In particular, the following are acknowledged for their significant contributions and dedication to completion of this effort. Special thanks to staff who made significant contributions for which we are supremely grateful: Executive Management • Jeanie Ward-Waller, Deputy Director, Planning and Modal Programs • Cory Binns, Deputy Director, Traffic Operations and Maintenance • Ellen Greenberg, Deputy Director, Sustainability • Marlon Flournoy, Division Chief, Transportation Planning • Kyle Gradinger, Division Chief, Rail and Mass Transportation • James Anderson, Division Chief, Financial Programming Caltrans Project Team • Frances Dea-Sanchez • Jason Finley • Kathryn Canepa • Patrick Tyner • Madison Buccola • Russ Walker • Joshua Pulverman • Andrew Cook • Jeff Morneau • Vishal Ream-Rao • Janette Ramirez • Tony Dang • Alan Steinberg • Marina Johansen • Rambabu Bavrisetty • Surjit Dhillon • Scott Sauer Caltrans Districts Staff from all twelve districts provided considerable input and assistance in the development of the ITSP. iii – Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 California Overview ................................................................................................................ 2 Interregional Transportation System ...................................................................................... 3 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 – Interregional Transportation Vision ...................................................................... 5 Coordination with Other Plans and Programs ..................................................................... 9 Chapter 3 – Strategic Interregional Corridor Summaries and Analysis ............................... 10 San Diego/Mexico Border – Inland Empire Connections Corridor .............................. 16 South Coast – Central Coast Corridor ............................................................................. 19 Central Coast – San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area Corridor ........................................ 22 San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area – North Coast Corridor ........................................... 25 San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area – Central Valley – Los Angeles Corridor ............... 28 Sacramento Valley – Oregon Border Corridor ............................................................... 32 High Desert – Eastern Sierra – Northern Nevada Corridor ............................................. 35 Southern California – Southern Nevada/Arizona Corridor ............................................ 38 Central Coast and San Joaquin Valley East-West Connections Corridor .................. 41 San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area – Sacramento – Northern Nevada Corridor ........ 44 North Coast – Northern Nevada Connections Corridor ............................................... 49 Appendix A: ITIP Scoring Criteria ............................................................................................. 52 Appendix B: Supporting Policies and Legislation .................................................................. 58 Appendix C: Interregional Corridor Analysis .......................................................................... 59 Appendix D: Interregional Road System ................................................................................ 66 Appendix E: ITIP Requirements ................................................................................................ 71 iv – Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1: Caltrans Modal Plans .................................................................................................. 9 Figure 2: Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan – Regions Map ................................. 11 Figure 3: Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan - Strategic Interregional Corridors .. 12 Figure 4: Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan – Priority Interregional Facilities ....... 13 Figure 5: Interregional Road System. ...................................................................................... 14 Figure 6: San Diego/Mexico Border - Inland Empire Connections Corridor Map. ............. 16 Figure 7: South Coast - Central Coast Corridor Map ............................................................ 19 Figure 8: Central Coast - San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area Corridor Map. ...................... 22 Figure 9: San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area - North Coast Corridor Map .......................... 25 Figure 10: San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area - Central Valley - Los Angeles Corridor Map .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 11: Sacramento Valley - Oregon Border Corridor Map. ........................................... 32 Figure 12: High Desert - Eastern Sierra - Northern Nevada Corridor Map. .......................... 35 Figure 13: Southern California - Southern Nevada/Arizona Corridor Map ......................... 38 Figure 14: Central Coast and San Joaquin Valley East-West Connections Corridor Map .................................................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 15: San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area - Sacramento - Northern Nevada Corridor Map ............................................................................................................................................ 45 Figure 16: North Coast - Northern Nevada Connections Corridor Map ............................. 49 Figure 17: Interstate 5 Facility Service Profile ......................................................................... 60 Figure 18: Highway 101 Facility Service Profile ....................................................................... 61 Figure 19: Highway 99 Facility Service Profile ......................................................................... 61 Figure 20: Interstate 580 Facility Service Profile ..................................................................... 62 Figure 21: Interstate 10 Facility Service Profile ....................................................................... 62 Figure 22: Interstate 15 Facility Service Profile ....................................................................... 63 Figure 23: Highway 46 Facility Service Profile ......................................................................... 63 Figure 24: Route 58 Facility Service Profile ............................................................................. 64 v – Table of Contents List of Tables Table 1: CTP 2050/2021 ITSP Goals and Objectives ................................................................ 8 Table 2: Strategic Interregional Corridors ............................................................................... 15 Table 3: San Diego/Mexico Border – Inland Empire Connections Corridor Priority Interregional Facility Improvements and Strategies ............................................................. 18 Table 4: South Coast–Central Coast Corridor Priority Interregional Facility Improvements and Strategies ........................................................................................................................... 21 Table 5: Central Coast–San Jose/San Francisco Bay Area Corridor Priority Interregional Facility Improvements and Strategies ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of Valentine Camp by Mary Farrell
    History of Valentine Camp Mary M. Farrell Trans-Sierran Archaeological Research P.O. Box 840 Lone Pine, CA 93545 November 7, 2015 Prepared for Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve University of California, Santa Barbara, Natural Reserve System Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory 1016 Mt. Morrison Road Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Abstract Located in Mammoth Lakes, California, Valentine Camp and the nearby Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory form the Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve, a field research station in the University of California's Natural Reserve System. The University’s tenure at Valentine Camp began over 40 years ago, but the area’s history goes back thousands of years. Before the arrival of Euroamericans in the nineteenth century, the region was home to Paiutes and other Native American tribes. Land just east of Valentine Camp was surveyed under contract with the United States government in 1856, and mineral deposits in the mountains just west of Valentine Camp brought hundreds of miners to the vicinity in the last decades of the nineteenth century. Even as mining in the region waned, grazing increased. The land that became Valentine Camp was patented in 1897 by Thomas Williams, a rancher and capitalist who lived in Owens Valley. It was Williams’s son, also Thomas, who sold the 160 acres to Valentine Camp’s founders. Those founders were very wealthy, very influential men in southern California who could have, and did, vacation wherever they wanted. Anyone familiar with the natural beauty of Mammoth Lakes would not be surprised that they chose to spend time at Valentine Camp. Valentine Camp was donated to the University of California Natural Land and Water Reserve System (now the Natural Reserve System) in 1972 to ensure the land’s continued protection.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 © Copyright by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains by Katherine Colby Glover Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Glen Michael MacDonald, Chair Long sediment records from offshore and terrestrial basins in California show a history of vegetation and climatic change since the last interglacial (130,000 years BP). Vegetation sensitive to temperature and hydroclimatic change tended to be basin-specific, though the expansion of shrubs and herbs universally signalled arid conditions, and landscpe conversion to steppe. Multi-proxy analyses were conducted on two cores from the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains to reconstruct a 125,000-year history for alpine southern California, at the transition between mediterranean alpine forest and Mojave desert. Age control was based upon radiocarbon and luminescence dating. Loss-on-ignition, magnetic susceptibility, grain size, x-ray fluorescence, pollen, biogenic silica, and charcoal analyses showed that the paleoclimate of the San Bernardino Mountains was highly subject to globally pervasive forcing mechanisms that register in northern hemispheric oceans. Primary productivity in Baldwin Lake during most of its ii history showed a strong correlation to historic fluctuations in local summer solar radiation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Geology Soils and Seismicity
    Chapter 9—Geology, Soils, and Seismicity 9.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing conditions (environmental and regulatory) and assesses the potential of the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (proposed MTP/SCS) to affect the regional geology, seismicity, soils, and mineral resources within the MTP/SCS plan area. This chapter evaluates potential impacts to geology, seismicity, soils, and mineral resources that may result from implementation of the proposed MTP/SCS. Where necessary and feasible, mitigation measures are identified to reduce these impacts. The information presented in this chapter is based on a review of existing and available information and is regional in scope. Data provided in this section is programmatic. It is appropriate for general policy planning and tiering of subsequent environmental documents; however site-specific evaluations may be necessary to determine future project-level environmental effects and appropriate mitigation. No comments regarding geology, soils, and seismicity were received during circulation of the Notice of Preparation (NOP). Appendix PD-1 includes all NOP comments received. 9.2 Environmental Setting 9.2.1 Geology and Topography This section addresses the geology and topography of the proposed MTP/SCS plan area. Figure 9.1 provides a geologic map of the SACOG region. The proposed MTP/SCS plan area includes El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties, which are located within the Great Valley geomorphic province and the Sierra Nevada geomorphic province. Both geomorphic provinces are discussed below. REGIONAL PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING OF THE MTP/SCS PLAN AREA The Great Valley of California, also called the Central Valley of California, is a nearly flat alluvial plain extending from the Tehachapi Mountains at the south to the Klamath Mountains at the north, and from the Sierra Nevada on the east to the Coast Ranges on the west.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Geologic Facts About California
    California Geological Survey - 150th Anniversary 150 Geologic Facts about California California’s geology is varied and complex. The high mountains and broad valleys we see today were created over long periods of time by geologic processes such as fault movement, volcanism, sea level change, erosion and sedimentation. Below are 150 facts about the geology of California and the California Geological Survey (CGS). General Geology and Landforms 1 California has more than 800 different geologic units that provide a variety of rock types, mineral resources, geologic structures and spectacular scenery. 2 Both the highest and lowest elevations in the 48 contiguous states are in California, only 80 miles apart. The tallest mountain peak is Mt. Whitney at 14,496 feet; the lowest elevation in California and North America is in Death Valley at 282 feet below sea level. 3 California’s state mineral is gold. The Gold Rush of 1849 caused an influx of settlers and led to California becoming the 31st state in 1850. 4 California’s state rock is serpentine. It is apple-green to black in color and is often mottled with light and dark colors, similar to a snake. It is a metamorphic rock typically derived from iron- and magnesium-rich igneous rocks from the Earth’s mantle (the layer below the Earth’s crust). It is sometimes associated with fault zones and often has a greasy or silky luster and a soapy feel. 5 California’s state fossil is the saber-toothed cat. In California, the most abundant fossils of the saber-toothed cat are found at the La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Little Piute Mountains, San Bernardino County, California
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Geologic Map of the Little Piute Mountains, San Bernardino County, California by Keith A. Howard1, Michael L. Dennis2, Karl E. Karlstrom3, and Geoffrey A. Phelps1 Open-File Report 95-598 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American stratigraphic code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purpose only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Menlo Park, California 94025 2 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002 3 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 Mapped 1978-1993 by K. Howard, P. Stone, K. Karlstrom, G. Phelps, M. Dennis, and students from Northern Arizona University. GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Introduction The Little Piute Mountains in the eastern Mojave Desert expose a series of folds and thrust faults involving metamorphosed Paleozoic strata (Miller and others, 1982; Stone and others, 1983). Detailed mapping of these structures was undertaken to help elucidate regional Mesozoic structural evolution. Earlier geologic maps were prepared by Cooksley (1960a,b,c,d, generalized by Bishop, 1964) and Stone and others (1983). Deformed and metamorphosed Paleozoic and Triassic rocks form a stratal succession that was originally deposited in shallow seas on the North American craton. Based on lithologic sequence the units are correlated with unmetamorphosed equivalents 200 km to the northeast in the Grand Canyon, Arizona, and 35-50 km to the west in the Marble, Ship, and Providence Mountains, California (Stone and others, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Indian Spring Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Indian Spring Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California by H.G. Wilshire 1 Open-File Report 92-181 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. *345 Middlefield Road MS/975, Menlo Park, CA 94025 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE INDIAN SPRING QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION Eruptive rocks of the Cima volcanic field occur almost entirely within six 7.5 minute quadrangles, Indian Spring, Marl Mountains, Granite Spring, Cow Cove, Solomons Knob, and Valley Wells. The following description applies to all six quadrangles. The Cima volcanic field is a small (-300 km^) Tertiary-Quaternary alkaline basalt field in the Ivanpah highlands (Hewett, 1956), in east-central Mojave Desert (Fig. 1). The basaltic rocks, which range from late Miocene to Holocene, were erupted from at least 71 vents. The younger vents are well-formed cinder cones, whereas older vents are marked by degraded cinder cones, plugs, and crater-fill lava flows. The volcanic rocks were described in a general geologic study by Hewett (1956). The southern part of the field was mapped by Barca (1966), and fie northern part by DeWitt (1980). Topical studies of the volcanic field include the geomorphology of pediment domes (Sharp, 1957; Dohrenwend and others, 1984a,b), geomorphic and soil evolution of the lava flows (Wells and others, 1984; McFadden and others, 1984), paleontology and stratigraphy of Tertiary and Quaternary deposits of the Shadow Valley Basin (Reynolds and Nance, 1988), structural studies (Hewett, 1956; Dunne, 1977; Reynolds, 1990; Skirvin and Wells, 1990), polycyclic volcanism (Renault and Wells, 1990), and evolution of the upper mantle and lower crust beneath Cima based on xenoliths in the basalts (Wilshire, 1990; Wilshire and others, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • California Availability of Books and Maps of the U.S
    CALIFORNIA AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL Books OVER THE COUNTER Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, al~ & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • WASHINGTON, D.C.--Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and C Sts., NW.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Earthquake Data from the Greater Los Angeles Basin and Adjacent Offshore Area, Southern California
    Final Technical Report Submitted to the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY By the Seismological Laboratory CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Grant No.: Award No. 02HQGR0044 Name of Contractor: California Institute of Technology Principal Investigator: Egill Hauksson Senior Research Associate of Geophysics Government Technical Officer: John Unger Title of Work: Analysis of Earthquake Data From the Greater Los Angeles Basin and Adjacent Offshore Area, Southern California Program Objective: I & III Effective Date of Contract: January 1, 2002 Expiration Date: December 31, 2003 Period Covered by report: 1 January 2003 – 31 December 2003 Amount of Contract: $100,000 Date: 3 March 2004 This work is sponsored by the U.S. Geological Survey under Contract Award No. 02HQGR0044. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessary representing the official policies, either expressed or implied of the U.S. Government. Analysis of Earthquake Data from the Greater Los Angeles Basin and Adjacent Offshore Area, Southern California U.S. Geological Survey Award No. 02HQGR0044 Element I & III Key words: Geophysics, seismology, seismotectonics Egill Hauksson Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Tel.: 626-395 6954 Email: [email protected] FAX: 626-564 0715 ABSTRACT We synthesize and interpret local earthquake data recorded by the Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismographic Network (SCSN/CISN) in southern California. The goal is to use the existing regional seismic network data to: (1) refine the regional tectonic framework; (2) investigate the nature and configuration of active surficial and concealed faults; (3) determine spatial and temporal characteristics of regional seismicity; (4) determine the 3-D seismic properties of the crust; and (5) delineate potential seismic source zones.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked
    Natural Areas Journal . to advance the preservation of natural diversity A publication of the Natural Areas Association - www.naturalarea.org © Natural Areas Association The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked David J. Germano1,6 1Department of Biology California State University Bakersfield, California, 93311-1022 Galen B. Rathbun2 Lawrence R. Saslaw3 Brian L. Cypher4 Ellen A. Cypher4 Larry M. Vredenburgh5 2Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy California Academy of Sciences Golden Gate Park, San Francisco c/o P.O. Box 202 Cambria, California 93428 3U.S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 4Endangered Species Recovery Program California State University-Stanislaus P.O. Box 9622 Bakersfield, CA 93389 5U. S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 6 Corresponding author: [email protected]; 661-654-2471 Natural Areas Journal 31:138–147 R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E ABSTRACT: The vegetation community of the San Joaquin Valley of California has been formally classified as a perennial grassland based largely on assumptions of past climax state. However, histori- cal records suggest that the region might be more accurately classified as a desert. The distinction is important in determining the appropriate management strategies for this ecosystem, particularly for the • many rare and endemic taxa that reside there. Abiotic and biotic factors–including low precipitation, arid soils, and desert-adapted plants and vertebrate–are consistent with conditions typical of desert ar- eas. We examined the distributions of these factors to define the extent of the San Joaquin Desert. We conclude that the San Joaquin Desert historically encompassed 28,493 km2 including the western and The San Joaquin southern two thirds of the San Joaquin Valley, and the Carrizo Plain and Cuyama Valley to the south- west.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurel-Convict Fault, Eastern Sierra Nevada, California: a Permoðtriassic Left-Lateral Fault, Not a Cretaceous Intrabatholithic Break
    The Laurel-Convict fault, eastern Sierra Nevada, California: A Permo–Triassic left-lateral fault, not a Cretaceous intrabatholithic break David C. Greene* Department of Geological Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno Nevada 89557 Calvin H. Stevens Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192 James M. Wise Department of Geological Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 ABSTRACT 1986; Saleeby and Busby, 1993; Kistler, 1993). Nokleberg (1983) inter- preted the Laurel-Convict fault as part of a major Triassic terrane boundary, The Laurel-Convict fault is a prominent, northwest-striking, high- separating unrelated rocks in his “High Sierra” and “Owens” terranes angle fault exposed in Paleozoic rocks of the Mount Morrison pen- (Fig. 1). Recently, Kistler (1993) proposed that the Laurel-Convict fault is dant in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California. The fault zone aver- an exposed segment of a postulated regional fault zone called Intra- ages 25–50 m in width and consists of narrow, anastomosing domains batholithic Break 3 (IBB3), interpreted to have Cretaceous right-lateral dis- of ductile deformation separating lenses of Paleozoic metasedimen- placement of greater than 65 km based on an apparent offset of the Sri 87 86 tary rock. The fault, which cuts structures in middle Permian meta- = 0.706 isopleth (Sri = initial ratio Sr/ Sr) (Kistler and Peterman, 1973). sedimentary rocks, is intruded by a relatively undeformed quartz Our new work in the Mount Morrison pendant indicates that the Laurel- porphyry felsite dike that has yielded a U-Pb zircon upper intercept Convict fault is a left-lateral strike-slip fault of moderate displacement that was age of 225 ± 16 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Patterns in Obsidian Usage in the Southern San Joaquin Valley, California
    Emerging Patterns in Obsidian Usage in the Southern San Joaquin Valley, California Mark Q. Sutton and Matthew R. Des Lauriers obsidian from Casa Diablo dominated the central San Abstract Joaquin Valley (Fig. 1). Data from the southern San Over the last 10 years, obsidian data have been obtained from a Joaquin Valley were not included in the study. number of sites in the southern San Joaquin Valley. In this paper, these data are reviewed as to age, source, and geographic distribu- tion. Several interesting patterns are beginning to emerge, including Further, Ericson (1982:139, Fig. 6.8) suggested that differential use of eastern California sources through time, an by the Late Horizon (ca. 1500 BP), use of the Casa absence of northern California sources, and some detail of how obsidian material was utilized in technology. Diablo and Bodie Hills sources had greatly dimin- ished and that there was a change from “biface” to Introduction “flake/blade” utilization technologies reflecting a shift from “fancy” items to more utilitarian use of obsidian; Interest in understanding the geographic, temporal, that is, there is a shift from the manufacture of large and cultural aspects of obsidian trade in California is items to small arrow points (Ericson 1982:144). It is considerable, and discussions of research into these also possible that increasing demand on a relatively patterns are many (see Jackson 1974; Jack 1976; Eric- limited supply (as a result of population expansion son 1982; Bouey and Basgall 1984; Hughes and Bet- and/or the introduction of the bow and arrow) resulted tinger 1984; Jackson and Ericson 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ–1767
    Geologic Map of the Valley Mountain 15' Quadrangle, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ–1767 Jurassic rocks in the Pinto Mountains. Virginia Dale Quartz Monzonite and dark, steeply dipping mafic dikes. Near the Marbolite Mine, 6 km east of Twentynine Palms Mountain. Photo by Lisanne Pearcy. 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................................1 Geologic Summary...........................................................................................................................................................................1 Description of Map Units ..................................................................................................................................................................4 References Cited............................................................................................................................................................................14 Figures Figure 1. Map showing location of the Valley Mountain 15' quadrangle. ...................................................................................1 Figure 2. Index to mapping in the Valley Mountain 15' quadrangle. ..........................................................................................4 Figure 3. Modal compositions of plutonic rocks in
    [Show full text]