DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY The Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices STUDY Abstract Oil prices have increased considerably over the past years at global level, while natural gas and other energy prices have seen differing developments in each world region. The present report examines the level of impact of high oil prices on European energy prices and analyses the underlying mechanisms. Policy options to reduce this impact are discussed. IP/A/ITRE/ST/2013-03 February 2014 PE 518.747 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. AUTHORS Uwe ALBRECHT, Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik (LBST) Matthias ALTMANN, Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik (LBST) Jan ZERHUSEN, Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik (LBST) Tetyana RAKSHA, Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik (LBST) Patrick MAIO, HINICIO Alexandre BEAUDET, HINICIO Paola TRUCCO, HINICIO Christian EGENHOFER, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Arno BEHRENS, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Jonas TEUSCH, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Julian WIECZORKIEWICZ, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Fabio GENOESE, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Guy MAISONNIER, IFPEN RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATORS Cécile KÉRÉBEL Balazs MELLAR Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in February 2014. © European Union, 2014. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6 LIST OF TABLES 10 LIST OF BOXES 10 LIST OF FIGURES 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 1. OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 21 1.1. Background 21 1.2. Aim and scope 22 1.3. Methodology and data sources 22 1.4. Structure 23 2. WHOLESALE PRICE TRENDS AND PRICING MECHANISMS 25 2.1. Long-term trends 26 2.1.1. Energy commodities 26 2.1.2. Non-energy commodities 28 2.1.3. Future projections of long-term trends 30 2.2. Crude oil 30 2.3. Natural gas 33 2.3.1. Introduction 33 2.3.2. Price trends 34 2.3.3. Market fundamentals 36 2.3.4. Price formation mechanisms 38 2.3.5. Regional differences in EU 53 2.3.6. Impact of oil price on natural gas prices 60 2.4. Steam coal 62 2.4.1. Introduction 62 2.4.2. Price trends 63 2.4.3. Market fundamentals 65 2.4.4. Price formation mechanisms 66 2.4.5. Regional differences in the EU 76 2.4.6. Impact of oil price on coal prices 80 2.5. Electricity 81 2.5.1. Introduction 81 2.5.2. Price trends 82 2.5.3. Market fundamentals 84 PE 518.747 3 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy 2.5.4. Price formation mechanisms 86 2.5.5. Regional differences in the EU 96 2.5.6. Impact of oil price on electricity prices 99 2.6. Oil products 101 2.6.1. Introduction 101 2.6.2. Price trends 101 2.6.3. Market fundamentals 102 2.6.4. Price formation mechanisms 105 2.6.5. Regional differences in the EU 105 2.6.6. Impact of oil price on oil products prices 106 2.7. Conclusions 107 3. RETAIL PRICE TRENDS AND PRICING MECHANISMS 108 3.1. The European retail energy market 108 3.1.1. Introduction 108 3.1.2. Market fundamentals 110 3.1.3. Electricity retail markets: recent price trends 113 3.1.4. Gas retail markets: recent price trends 116 3.2. Energy bills: main price components and drivers 119 3.2.1. Decomposition of electricity retail prices 120 3.2.2. Decomposition of gas retail prices 123 3.2.3. Analysis of price components 126 3.2.4. National structures of retail electricity and gas prices 135 3.3. Conclusions 140 4. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OIL PRICE IMPACT 141 4.1. Market factors 142 4.1.1. LNG 142 4.1.2. The impact of US shale gas 143 4.2. Regulatory and political factors 146 4.2.1. The impact of price controls 146 4.2.2. The impact of gas price de-indexation 146 4.3. Other factors 148 4.4. Conclusion 149 5. EVALUATION OF POLICY OPTIONS 151 5.1. Completing the Internal Market to decouple gas and oil prices in Europe 152 5.1.1. The role of infrastructure in enabling wholesale markets 152 4 PE 518.747 Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices 5.1.2. The completion of the Gas Target Model 154 5.1.3. Policy recommendations 155 5.2. Changes in energy taxation in Europe 156 5.2.1. Introduction 156 5.2.2. Energy taxation in Europe 156 5.2.3. Policy recommendations 159 5.3. Energy efficiency, energy savings and renewable energies 160 5.3.1. Regulatory background 160 5.3.2. Addressing the link between oil and energy prices 162 5.3.3. Policy recommendations 163 5.4. Other possible options 164 5.4.1. Facilitate the import of US LNG 164 5.4.2. Support the Connecting Europe Facility 165 5.4.3. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) 166 5.4.4. Innovative shale gas extraction methods 167 5.5. Summary: Towards a full decoupling of oil and gas prices? 168 5.6. Putting policy options into perspective 169 REFERENCES 170 ANNEX A: Market fundamentals of natural gas 185 ANNEX B: Market fundamentals of steam coal 192 ANNEX C: Fuel costs of international maritime coal transport 197 ANNEX D: Methodology applied for the selection of 10 Member States 198 ANNEX E: Individual Member States energy price components 200 PE 518.747 5 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS a year ACCC Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ACER Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators ARA Amsterdam Rotterdam Antwerp AU Australia bbl barrel bcf Billion cubic feet (used in the USA; 1 bcf = 0.283 bcm) bcm Billion cubic meter btu British thermal unit (a traditional unit of energy equal to about 1055 Joule) BDEW Federal Association of the Energy and Water Industry (Germany) BDI Baltic Dry Index BE Belgium BEH Bulgarian Energy Holding BG Bulgaria BGR German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) CA Canada CAPEX Capital Expenditure CCL UK Climate Change Levy CDG Single Balancing Point (Spain) CEF Connecting Europe Facility CEGH Central European Gas Hub (Austria) CHP Combined Heat and Power CIF Cost Insurance Freight CNE Comision National de Energia (Spain) CNG Compressed natural gas CO Colombia CPI Consumer Price Index 6 PE 518.747 Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices CY Cyprus CZ Czech Republic d day DE Germany EC European Coimmission EDF Electricité de France EE Energy Efficiency EED Energy Efficiency Directive EEX European Energy Exchange EIA Energy Information Administration EMIR European Market Infrastructure Regulation EMV Energy Market Authority (Finland) EPEX European Power Exchange ES Spain ETS Emission Trading System EU European Union EU15 Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom EU-27 All EU Member States up to 30 June 2013 EUA EU Allowance FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FI Finland FOB Free On Board (buyer pays for transportation of goods) FR France FSU Former Soviet Union FTA Free trade agreement FTT Financial Transaction Tax GDP Gross domestic product GOG Gas-On-Gas (competition) PE 518.747 7 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy GPL Gaspool (Germany) GWh Gigawatt hour HCPI Harmonised Consumer Price Index HFO Heavy Fuel Oil hl hectolitre HU Hungary ID Indonesia IEA International Energy Agency IGU International Gas Union IT Italy kWh Kilowatt hour lb Pound LNG Liquefied Natural Gas LT Lithuania LTC long-term contract MMBtu One million btu (1 MMBtu = 1,055 Megajoule) MS Member State of the EU MWh Megawatt hour NBP National Balancing Point NCG Net Connect Germany (Germany) NEK National Electricity Company (Bulgaria) NG Natural Gas NGPA US Natural Gas Policy Act NL The Netherlands NYMEX New York Mercantile Exchange OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OPEX Operational Expenditure OTC Over-the-counter PCI Project of Common Interest PEG Point d'Échange de Gaz (France) 8 PE 518.747 Impact of the Oil Price on EU Energy Prices PEP Pan European Power Index PGNiG Polish Oil and Gas Company PL Poland PRB Powder River Basin PSV Punto di Scambio Virtuale (Italy) RED Renewable Energy Directive REMIT Regulation on Energy Market Integrity and Transparency RES Renewable Energy Sources RU Russia t Ton tcm Trillion cubic meter TAP Trans Adriatic Pipeline tce Ton of coal equivalent TEN Trans-European Networks TFF Title Transfer Facility (Netherlands) TJ Terajoule TSC Taxes and Social Contributions TUR Tariff of last resort (tarifa de último recurso) UA Ukraine UK United Kingdom US United States of America USA United States of America VAT Value Added Tax WTI West Texas Intermediate (grade of crude oil used as a benchmark in oil pricing) ZA South Africa ZEE Zeebrugge Platform (Belgium) PE 518.747 9 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Physical hubs vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL REPORT Mechanical Systems Re-Design and Breadth Topics Northfield Mental Healthcare Center Northfield, Ohio
    FINAL REPORT Mechanical Systems Re-Design and Breadth Topics Northfield Mental Healthcare Center Northfield, Ohio Ji Won Park Mechanical Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Stephen Treado Date revised and submitted: April, 3rd, 2013 Final Report Northfield Mental Healthcare Center Dr. Stephen Treado Ji Won Park Mechanical Option Spring 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 8 SECTION ONE. PROJECT BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Existing Mechanical System Summary .................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Energy modeling - Input ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.3.1 Design Condition ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.2 Model Design .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: a Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers
    Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers OCTOBER 2011 Fuel Cell Oak Ridge Technologies Program National Laboratory PROCURING FUEL CELLS FOR STATIONARY POWER NOTICE Available electronically at This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/ the United States government. Neither the United States government nor fc_publications.html#fe_stationary any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, Available for a processing fee to completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process U.S. Department of Energy and its disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. contractors, in paper, from: Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service U.S. Department of Energy by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily Office of Scientific and Technical Information constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United P.O. Box 62 States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States phone: 865.576.8401 government or any agency thereof. fax: 865.576.5728 email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical
    [Show full text]
  • Winds of Change: an Analysis of Recent Changes In
    Winds of change An analysis of recent changes in the South Australian electricity market McConnell & Sandiford August 2016 About the Melbourne Energy Institute The Melbourne Energy Institute brings together the work of over 150 researchers, across seven faculties at The University of Melbourne , providing international leadership in energy research and delivering solutions to meet our future energy needs. By bringing together discipline-based research strengths and by engaging with stakeholders outside the University, the Institute offers the critical capacity to rethink the way we generate, deliver and use energy. The Institute presents research opportunities in bioenergy, solar, wind, geothermal, nu- clear, fuel cells and carbon capture and storage. It also engages in energy efficiency for urban planning, architecture, transport and distributed systems, and reliable energy transmission. Economic and policy questions constitute a significant plank of the Institutes research pro- gram and include: market regulation and demand; carbon trading; energy system modelling; climate change feed backs; and social justice implications of energy policy. Acknowledgments The Melbourne Energy Institute acknowledges the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) and the Australian-German Climate & Energy College for their support of this research. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. Winds of Change - an analysis of recent changes in the South Australian electricity mar- ket is licensed CC BY 3.0 AU. doi:10.4225/49/57A0A5C1373F9
    [Show full text]
  • CHP Guide #2: Level 1 Feasibility Screening for Combined Heat And
    HUD CHP GUIDE #2: FEASIBILITY SCREENING FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER IN MULTIFAMILY HOUSING Prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 2009 HUD CHP GUIDE #2: FE AS IB ILITY S CR E E NING FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER 2 Introduction The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) 2002 Energy Action Plan1 includes an initiative to promote the use of combined heat and power (CHP) in multifamily housing. The primary target is existing buildings. The average efficiency of the fossil-fueled power plants in the U.S. is 33% and has remained virtually unchanged for 40 years. This means that two-thirds of the energy in the fuel is lost as heat, and 8% of the remainder is lost in transmission and distgribution over wires. Combined Heat and Power (CHP)--also known as “cogeneration”—is the sequential production of two or more useful forms of energy from a single fuel consuming device. CHP systems recycle waste heat and convert it to useful energy, and they can achieve overall efficiencies of over 80%. CHP can significantly reduce a multi-family building’s annual energy costs. Instead of buying all the building’s electricity from a utility and separately purchasing fuel for its heating (mechanical) equipment, most--or even all--of the electricity and heat can be produced for less money by a small on-site power plant operating at a higher combined efficiency. The best economic prospects for CHP are single buildings with at least 100 units, master metered for utilities, with access to natural gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Power & Utilities in Europe | Newsletter July 2018
    Power & Utilities July 2018 Newsletter Power & Utilities in Europe Commodities Crude oil ($/bbl) Crude oil prices experienced mild volatility in Q2 2018. In May, Brent prices reached $77 per barrel while WTI prices reached $70 per barrel. However, oil prices fell slightly in June 2018 following OPEC announcements to increase production. 130 120 Furthermore, the Brent-WTI spread widened to $10, a magnitude last seen in 110 February 2015. 100 90 The continued rise in oil prices this quarter was driven by supply concerns 80 following US economic sanctions against Iran. These sanctions led to the exit of 70 prominent oil companies from Iran, most notably Total and Maersk, the former 60 50 having committed a billion US dollars’ worth of investments in 2017. In addition, the 40 ongoing political and economic crisis in Venezuela contributed to further declines in 30 oil output and hence an increase in prices. Jun-14ec-14 Jun-15ec-15 Jun-16ec-16 Jun-17ec-17 Jun-18ec-18 Jun-19ec-19 Jun-20ec-20 In spite of this, the upward movement in oil prices cooled in June 2018 due to Spot Brent Spot WTI Future Brent Future WTI concerns over plans by OPEC and Russia to increase oil production. Following OPEC’s meeting on 22 June 2018 in Vienna, member countries agreed to comply with Source Capital IQ output targets set in 2016, although no specific details were forthcoming. These 2016 targets aimed to reduce output by 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd). However, due to supply disruptions (in particular Venezuela, Angola and Libya), actual reductions exceeded the targets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Electricity and Natural Gas in Spain
    energies Article Energy Market Prices in Times of COVID-19: The Case of Electricity and Natural Gas in Spain Luis M. Abadie Basque Centre for Climate Change—BC3, Edificio Sede No. 1, 1st Floor, Basque Country University Science Park, 48940 Leioa, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-944-014-690 Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic is having a strong impact on the economies of all countries, negatively affecting almost all sectors. This paper compares Spanish electricity and natural gas prices in the first half-year of 2020 with the prices expected for that period at the end of 2019. The half-year of 2020 selected coincides with the period of greatest impact of COVID-19 on Spanish society. Expected prices and their future probability distributions are calculated using a stochastic model with deterministic and stochastic parts; the stochastic part includes mean-reverting and jumps behaviour. The model is calibrated with 2016–2019 daily spot prices for electricity and with day-ahead prices for natural gas. The results show large monthly differences between the prices expected at the end of the year 2019 and the actual prices for the half-year; in May 2020, wholesale electricity prices are found to be EUR 31.60/MWh lower than expected, i.e., 60% lower. In the case of natural gas, the prices in the same month are EUR 8.96/MWh lower than expected, i.e., 62% lower. The spark spread (SS) is positive but lower than expected and also lower than in the same months of the previous year. Keywords: electricity prices; natural gas prices; COVID-19; stochastic models; jumps; spark spread Citation: Abadie, L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Power Spreads in Electricity Futures Markets: a Multinational Analysis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Spodniak, Petr; Bertsch, Valentin Working Paper Determinants of power spreads in electricity futures markets: A multinational analysis ESRI Working Paper, No. 580 Provided in Cooperation with: The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin Suggested Citation: Spodniak, Petr; Bertsch, Valentin (2017) : Determinants of power spreads in electricity futures markets: A multinational analysis, ESRI Working Paper, No. 580, The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174313 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Working Paper No. 580 December 2017 Determinants of power spreads in electricity futures markets: A multinational analysis Petr Spodniak*a,b and Valentin Bertscha,b Abstract: The growth in variable renewable energy (vRES) and the need for flexibility in power systems go hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Power Plants Under Emission Reduction Regulations and Investing in New Technologies: an Exchange Option on Real Options
    University of Oxford Kellogg College Master of Science in Mathematical Finance Valuing power plants under emission reduction regulations and investing in new technologies: An exchange option on real options d-fine GmbH1 Supervisor: Professor Sam Howison2 April 2010 1d-fine GmbH, Opernplatz 2, 60313 Frankfurt, Germany (info@d-fine.de) 2University of Oxford, Mathematical Institute, [email protected] Abstract In this dissertation we model the value of a power generation asset through a real option approach. With electricity, fuel and emission allowances we express every essential uncertainty on the energy market by an own stochastic process and derive an optimal clean spark spread. Typical operational constraints of a power plant are taken into account. Beside analysing the behaviour of the generation asset under different constraints, we want to evaluate the option to invest in new technologies to improve these constraints. In this dissertation, we do not set up the standard American option with strike equal to the investment as usual, but set up an exchange option on two real options with different constraints. We show that this approach handles an option on new technology much more sensitive to the individual price uncertainties and considers all possible employments. If the intrinsic value of the exchange option exceeds the realization costs, it is time to invest. We also state an explicit Monte Carlo algorithm and present numerical results for the option to install a Carbon Capture and Storage unit. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Modelling power plants 5 2.1 The clean spark spread . 5 2.2 Energy markets .
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Value in Challenging Times July 2016
    Sustaining value in challenging times July 2016 Capital Markets Story Agenda 1. Investment rationale 2. Financial highlights & commitment to shareholders 3. Appendix 3.1 European Generation 3.2 Global Commodities 3.3 International Power 3.4 Top-Management incentives & Uniper Supervisory Board 2 What we as Uniper stand for Portfolio Performance Potential 3 Focused portfolio with attractive assets Portfolio Performance across Europe/Russia Potential • One of the largest European generators with 31 GW of own, mostly dispatchable generation capacity European • Diversified base across technologies and main NWE Generation markets • Strong capabilities in construction, operations and maintenance • A leading physical energy trader with global footprint • Large gas midstream business in Europe with more than Global 400 TWh gas LTC portfolio, own storage capacity of Commodities 8.8 bcm and pipeline shareholdings • Participation in giant Russian gas field • Optimisation of European Generation portfolio • Number 3 privately-owned Russian generation company International • ~30% capacity increase since 2010 Power • 11 GW of generation assets 4 Diversified earning sources Portfolio Performance Potential 59% Adj. 18% EBITDA 1 23% European Global International Generation Commodities Power • Hydro fleet with low variable costs • Gas midstream driven by • Favourable regulatory framework a significant earnings contributor integrated steering and providing largely predictable • Fossil fleet benefits from optimisation of assets and positions earnings from Russian capacity significant share of non-wholesale along the midstream value chain markets earnings • Stability of business in local • Stable infrastructure elements from currency terms • Flexibility of CCGTs not yet gas pipeline participations significantly contributing to • Diversified Russian earnings from earnings power • Plateau gas production at limited long-term capacity contracts costs (new), capacity auctions (old) and energy-only market 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Program on Technology Innovation:Scenario-Based
    Program on Technology Innovation: Scenario-Based Technology R&D Strategy for the Electric Power Industry: Final Report Volume 2 - Background Information and Details Technical Report Program on Technology Innovation: Scenario-Based Technology R&D Strategy for the Electric Power Industry: Final Report Volume 2 – Background Information and Details 1014385 Final Report, December 2006 EPRI Project Manager R. Schainker ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 3420 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304-1338 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303-0813 • USA 800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • [email protected] • www.epri.com DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogeneration & Trigeneration – How to Produce Energy Efficiently
    Cogeneration & Trigeneration – How to Produce Energy Efficiently A practical Guide for Experts in Emerging and Developing Economies Published by: Cogeneration & Trigeneration – How to Produce Energy Efficiently A practical Guide for Experts in Emerging and Developing Economies 4 CONTENTS Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ...............................................................................................................8 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................13 2 Co- and Trigeneration Technologies and their Application ............................................18 2.1 Introduction and Definitions .......................................................................................................19 2.2 Cogeneration Technologies ...........................................................................................................23 2.3 Trigeneration Technologies ..........................................................................................................23 2.3.1 Absorption Technology ........................................................................................................24 2.3.2 Adsorption Technology ........................................................................................................25 2.4 Gas Engines ...........................................................................................................................................26 2.5 Steam Turbines
    [Show full text]
  • Coal: a Global Fuel
    Coal: A Global Fuel Challenges & Perspectives Dr. M Valdelievre Politechnika - Warszaw - May 2015 Programme Day 1- Monday 20 April Coal: A Global Fuel 1- Coal: a Fossil Fuel 1H Primary Energy Fuel Geology -Origin – Ranking - Analysis World Reserves & Production: Hard Coal-Lignite-Peat 2- The Coal chain: 2H Mining Techniques Health, Safety & Environment Concerns Coal Preparation & Beneficiation Process Bulk Transportation International Coal Flow - The Seaborne Market Day 2 –Tuesday 3- Industrial Process 1H30 Methane from Coal : CBM - CMM Coal Conversion: to Gas & Liquid CTL/CTO Industry kiln: Steel mills & Cement Plants Coal & Power: a sustainable Binomial 4-Tutorial Work Session 1H 30 Day 3 - Wednesday Combustion : Effluents & CO2 Challenges 5 Coal Combustion: 1H30 general Features Effluent SOX-NOX-PM-Metal .. Formation/Reduction Emission Regulations 6- Industrial Plants: Clean Combustion Technologies-CCT 1H30 Pulverized - PC Fluidized bed - FBC-CFBC- Bubble Bed Gasification Plant- IGCC Day 4 –Thursday 7 Tutorial Work Session 1H30 8- CO2 Problematic 1H30 CO2 Emission Trend CO2 Reduction: Combustion Efficiency/Super Critical Regime… Co-Firing Biomass CO2 Capture & Storage / CCS Day 5 –Friday 9- 21st Century Coal Perspectives 1H 30 Coal Cases: INDIA-CHINA-USA-EU/Germany Last Words 10- Coal Test 1 H 1- Coal: A Primary Fuel 2013/2012 Facts ( WCA.est.) Coal World Consumption + 3 % 30.1 % of Primary Energy 41% of Electricity Generation +/- 68% Coal used for Electricity Generation Coal: a Successful Story… Thanks to Coal to have fueled the industrial
    [Show full text]