Felix Berezin Life and Death of the Mastermind of Supermathematics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Felix Berezin Life and Death of the Mastermind of Supermathematics January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword iii FELIX BEREZIN LIFE AND DEATH OF THE MASTERMIND OF SUPERMATHEMATICS Edited by M. Shifman January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword iv Copyright page The Editor and Publisher would like to thank the American Math- ematical Society for their kind permission to reprint the articles of V. Maslov, R. Minlos, M. Shubin, N. Vvedenskaya and the first article of A. Vershik from the American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, Advances in the Mathematical Sciences, Volume 175, 1996. Paintings Alexandra Rozenman Black-and-white sketches Yuri Korjevsky Graphic design Leigh Simmons Photographs Elena Karpel’s collection FELIX BEREZIN: LIFE AND DEATH OF THE MASTERMIND OF SUPERMATHEMATICS January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword FOREWORD M. SHIFMAN W.I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA [email protected] The story of this Memorial Volume is as follows. In the fall of 2005 Arkady Vainshtein mentioned in passing that he had received Elena Karpel’s essay on Felix Berezin from his friend Dmitri Gitman. Of course, every student and every practitioner of modern field theory knows the Berezin integral over the Grassmann variables, which con- stitutes the basis of the current approach to theories with fermions and quantization of gauge theories (introduction of ghosts). Without using the Berezin integral, string theory and supersymmetry stud- ies, which are at the focus of modern high-energy physics, would be extremely hard, if not impossible. That was about the only thing I knew about Berezin, in addition to the fact that he had died in an accident in 1980 at the age of 49. I met him in person only once or twice in the late 1970s at seminars in Moscow. My impression was that the Berezin integral had always existed, “from the days of antiquity.” I am sure, this is also the impression of young people who came to mathematical and theoretical physics in the 1990s and later. Given Arkady’s remark that the essay was very moving, and my interest in the history of high-energy physics, my immediate reaction was to get hold of this memoir as soon as possible and read it myself. I wrote to Gitman, and he kindly forwarded to me the original Russian text. I read it right away. Indeed, it was both moving and master- fully written. To say that it was impressive is an understatement. I was captivated by the depth and literary maturity of Karpel’s story, a story of the life and death of a remarkable man, an outstanding mathematician whose ideas were ahead of his time and in many in- v January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword vi stances were not immediately appreciated by his contemporaries. It was only later that they shaped entire areas of mathematical physics and proved to be instrumental in the development of modern high- energy theory and string theory. What struck me most was an obvious similarity between Berezin’s life and fate and those of other Soviet scholars on whose biographies I had worked in the past. This volume is my fourth book of this type. In 2000 I published two books honoring Yuri Golfand,a the theoreti- cal physicist who discovered supersymmetry in four-dimensional field theories. In 2005 I edited a book dedicated to the memory of Bella Subbotovskaya,b a pioneer in the mathematics of complex systems and the founder of the Jewish People’s University in Moscow in the late 1970s and early ’80s. These three people were contemporaries, but everything else was different — age, gender, family status, char- acter traits, general interests, areas in which they worked... And yet, they shared a common destiny: intellectual potential wasted in vain, suppressed talents, unacknowledged skills, unfulfilled expectations, everyday humiliations, neglect and outright persecution by the au- thorities... Their lives were broken, just as the lives of so many other people whose only “fault” was to be born in the wrong place at the wrong time. Officially, they were supposed to enjoy the “advantages of real socialism,” Soviet style. And instead?.. How many discover- ies could have been made? How many good deeds could have been done? We will never know. My involvement in Berezin’s story became a personal issue, even though I never knew this man personally. Soon my investigations led me to a group of mathematicians c who in 1996 edited the F.A. Berezin Memorial Volume issued by the American Mathemat- ical Society.d In addition to mathematical treatises this Volume aThe Many Faces of the Superworld, Ed. M. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000); The Supersymmetric World, Ed. G. Kane and M. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000). bYou Failed Your Math Test, Comrade Einstein, Ed. M. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005). cR.L. Dobrushin, R.A. Minlos, M.A. Shubin, A.M. Vershik. dAmerican Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, Advances in the Mathematical Sciences, Volumes 175 and 177 (AMS, Providence, Rhode Island, 1996). January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword vii contained recollections by some of Berezin’s friends and colleagues. The reader will find these articles reprinted below, in Part II of the present book. I wrote to Misha Shubin, Anatoly Vershik and Nikita Vvedenskaya, who replied to my letters immediately promising their enthusiastic support. Professor Vershik went as far as to prepare a new essay on Felix Berezin, written expressly for this book, which you will also see in Part II. He also informed me of a recent Russian publication honoring Felix Berezin.e In November of 2005 I got in touch with Elena Karpel, and in the summer of 2006 I met and interviewed her in La Rochelle, the French city where she now resides. In 1990 she and her daughter Natalie Berezin left the Soviet Union in a bid to start a new life in France. She told me of the fifteen years that had elapsed since then, a dramatic story of a long struggle for survival in an unfamiliar and often hostile environment. Being quite remarkable by itself, this story does not belong to this book, however. It may or may not be published elsewhere in the future. Karpel’s memoir, which constitutes the core of this book, is very dear to Elena Grigorievna. She tried first to publish the original Russian version in Russia. For various reasons this attempt failed, as did her subsequent attempt to publish a French translation in France. Thus, the English translation which opens Part II presents the first publication. Elena Grigorievna connected me with Victor Palamodov who now resides in Israel and, somewhat later, with Dimitri Leites in Germany. They took this project close to their hearts. Not only did they con- tribute original articles, they also offered plenty of advice and com- ments as to possible improvements. I managed to implement some of them. From day one I was in permanent contact with Dmitri Gitman. His story of a few encounters with Felix Berezin presents a clear picture of the atmosphere we lived in. It nicely matches and, in a sense, supplements Karpel’s memoir. This book consists of three parts. Part I contains two surveys eZapiski Nauchnyh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 331, Representation Theory, Dynamical Sys- tems, Combinatorial and Algorithmic Methods, Ed. A. Vershik, (St. Petersburg, 2006), pp. 1–235. January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword viii written by Andrei Losev and Robert Minlos summarizing the scien- tific contribution of Felix Berezin. They show Berezin’s discoveries and innovative ideas in mathematical physics in a proper perspective, that of today’s researcher. Part II presents recollections by Elena Karpel and Berezin’s col- leagues, friends and students. Finally, in Part III of this Volume I publish the English translation of two documents from Berezin’s archive: letters to the Rector of the Moscow State University and to the Governing Board of the Moscow Mathematical Society. Needless to say, currently they are only of historic interest. They acquaint the reader with the work environment to which Felix Berezin was confined. For the Western reader it will be hard to understand what he was fighting for. Ironically, the suggestions that Berezin made in his letters are standard procedure at Western universities. In the process of conducting this work, I shared my excitement with many friends. Some of them had the opportunity to read Karpel’s memoir either in its original form or at various stages of translation. One of the first readers was a well-known artist, Alexan- dra Rozenman, whose paintings are in high demand among the col- lectors and galleries. Captivated by the sad melody of this story she created the painting One-Way Ticket expressing this melody in a vi- sual form. The reader will find a small reproduction in the beginning of Part II. General acknowledgments I am grateful to Ashleigh Geib who was responsible for typesetting a part of this volume in LATEX. My deep gratitude goes to Anne Barthel for expert advice on English grammar. Her effort at improving the English translation of Karpel’s memoir is impossible to overestimate. I want to thank Iman Benmachiche for her assistance with French, and Anya Dashevsky, Joel Giedt and Stephen Gasiorowicz for proof- reading some parts of the manuscript. I am thankful to Roxanne Weymouth who handled all the financial aspects of this project. My friend and colleague Dimitry Leites kindly agreed to proofread Losev’s review and Part III of this book and made valuable remarks.
Recommended publications
  • Creative Discomfort: the Culture of the Gelfand Seminar at Moscow University Slava Gerovitch
    Creative Discomfort: The Culture of the Gelfand Seminar at Moscow University Slava Gerovitch 1 Memory Israel Gelfand’s weekly seminar at Moscow State University, which ran continu- ously from 1943 to 1989, has gained a legendary status in the Russian mathematics community. It has been praised as “maybe the greatest seminar in the history of the Mechanical-Mathematical Faculty of Moscow University,”1 “probably the best seminar in the history of mathematics,”2 and even “one of the most productive seminars in the history of science.”3 According to seminar participants, the seminar “ardently followed all that was new in mathematics anywhere in the world”4 and “made a decisive impact on mathematical life in Moscow.”5 Many outstanding mathematicians remember the seminar fondly as their crucial coming-of-age experience. Before we conjure up an idyllic image of a harmonic chorus of great mathe- maticians conversing magnificently on topics of utmost scholarly importance, let us read a bit more from the memoirs of the same seminar participants. The seminar has 1Tikhomirov (2008), p. 10. 2Interview with Aleksei Sosinskii, 20 October 2009 (http://polit.ru/article/2009/10/20/absossinsky_ about_imgelfand/). 3Tikhomirov (2008), p. 25. 4Landis (2007), p. 69. 5Arnold (2009), p. 40. S. Gerovitch (&) Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA e-mail: [email protected] © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 51 B. Larvor (ed.), Mathematical Cultures, Trends in the History of Science, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_4
    [Show full text]
  • From Russia with Math
    HERBHigher Education in Russia and Beyond From Russia with Math ISSUE 4(6) WINTER 2015 Dear colleagues, We are happy to present the sixth issue of Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, a journal that is aimed at bringing current Russian, Central Asian and Eastern European educational trends to the attention of the international higher education research community. The new issue unfolds the post-Soviet story of Russian mathematics — one of the most prominent academic fields. We invited the authors who could not only present the post-Soviet story of Russian math but also those who have made a contribution to its glory. The issue is structured into three parts. The first part gives a picture of mathematical education in the Soviet Union and modern Russia with reflections on the paths and reasons for its success. Two papers in the second section are devoted to the impact of mathematics in terms of scientific metrics and career prospects. They describe where Russian mathematicians find employment, both within and outside the academia. The last section presents various academic initiatives which highlight the specificity of mathematical education in contemporary Russia: international study programs, competitions, elective courses and other examples of the development of Russian mathematical school at leading universities. ‘Higher Education in Russia and Beyond’ editorial team Guest editor for this issue – Vladlen Timorin, professor and dean of the Faculty of Mathematics at National Research University Higher School of Economics. HSE National Research University Higher School of Economics Higher School of Economics incorporates 49 research is the largest center of socio-economic studies and one of centers and 14 international laboratories, which are the top-ranked higher education institutions in Eastern involved in fundamental and applied research.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Statistical Physics
    Felix Berezin Lectures on Statistical Physics Translated from the Russian and edited by D. Leites Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences Lahore, Pakistan Summary. The book is an edited and updated transcript of the lectures on Sta- tistical Physics by the founder of supersymmetry theory | Felix Berezin. The lectures read at the Department of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University in 1966{67 contain inimitable Berezin's uniform approach to the Bose and Fermi particles, and his unique approach to quantization. These approaches were used with incredible success in the study of solid state physics, disorder and chaos (K. Efetov), and in a recent (and not yet generally accepted claim of) solution of one of Clay's Millennium problems (A. Dynin). The book is addressed to mathematicians (from sophomore level up) and physi- cists of any level. ISBN 978-969-9236-02-0 °c Dimitry Leites, translation into English and editing, 2009. °c Felix Berezin; his heirs, 2009. Contents Author's Preface . v Editor's preface . vi Part I The Classical Statistical Physics 1 Background from Classical Mechanics . 3 1 The Ensemble of Microscopic Subsystems ::::::::::::::::: 9 2 Physical assumptions. Ergodic Hypothesis. Gibbs's distribution. 9 3 An heuristic deduction of the Gibbs distribution . 14 4 A complete deduction of the Gibbs distribution . 17 5 Relation to thermodynamics . 24 6 Properties of the entropy . 33 7 Analytical appendix to Chapter 1 . 39 2 Real gases ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 43 8 Physical assumptions . 43 9 The Gibbs Distribution in the Small Canonical Ensemble . 46 10 The correlation functions in the small ensemble . 50 11 The Bogolyubov equations .
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Berezin
    FELIX BEREZIN This book is about Felix Berezin, an outstanding Soviet mathematician who in the 1960s and 70s was the driving force behind the emergence of the branch of mathematics now known as supermathematics. PART The integral over the anticoommuting Grassmann variables he introduced in the 1960s laid the ONE foundation for the path integral formulation of quantum field theory with fermions, the heart of modern supersymmetric field theories and superstrings. The Berezin integral is named for him, as is the closely related construction of the Berezinian which may be regarded as the superanalog of the determinant. PART In a masterfully written memoir Berezin’s widow, Elena Karpel, narrates a remarkable story of TWO Berezin’s life and his struggle for survival in the totalitarian Soviet regime. This story is supple- mented by recollections of Berezin’s close friends and colleagues. Berezin’s acccomplishments of Supermathematics Life and death of the mastermind in mathematics, his novel ideas and breakthrough works, are reviewed in two articles written by Andrei Losev and Robert Minlos. ABOUT M. Shifman is the Ida Cohen Fine Professor of Physics at the University of Minnesota. After receiv- THE EDITOR ing his PhD (1976) from the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics in Moscow he went through all stages of the academic career there. In 1990 he moved to the USA to assume his present position as a member of the William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute at the University of Minnesota. In 1997 he was elected as a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He has had the honor of receiving the 1999 Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics and the 2006 Julius Edgar Lilienfeld Prize for outstanding contributions to physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis on Superspace: an Overview
    BULL. AUSTRAL. MATH. SOC. 58C50, 15A75, 17B70, 46S20, 81Q60 VOL. 50 (1994) [135-165] ANALYSIS ON SUPERSPACE: AN OVERVIEW VLADIMIR G. PESTOV The concept of superspace is fundamental for some recent physical theories, notably supersymmetry, and a mathematical feedback for it is provided by superanalysis and supergeometry. We survey the state of affairs in superanalysis, shifting our attention from supermanifold theory to "plain" superspaces. The two principal existing approaches to superspaces are sketched and links between them discussed. We examine a problem by Manin of representing even geometry (analysis) as a collective effect in infinite-dimensional purely odd geometry (analysis), by applying the technique of nonstandard (infinitesimal) analysis. FOREWORD "Superspace is the greatest invention since the wheel" (see [59]). I don't know how many of us would agree with this radical statement, and it was only intended to be a jocular epigraph, of course. However, the concept of superspace is thriving indeed in theoretical physics of our days. Under superspace physicists understand our space-time labeled not only with usual coordinates (x11), but also with anticommuting coordinates (0a), and endowed with a representation of a certain group or, better still, supergroup, whatever it means. The anticommuting coordinates represent certain internal degrees of freedom of the physical system. This concept was actually known in physics since the early 60s or late 50s [138, 138, 91, 28], but what made it so important was the discovery of supersymmetry [144, 131, 145], which is an essentially new form of symmetry unifying fermions (particles of matter) with bosons (particles carrying interaction between bosons).
    [Show full text]
  • Bagger-CH1 29..41
    Advisory Board Stephen Adler (IAS) Vladimir Akulov (New York) Aiyalam Balachandran (Syracuse) Eric Bergshoeff (Groningen) Ugo Bruzzo (SISSA) Roberto Casalbuoni (Firenze) Christopher Hull (London) JuurgenFuchs€ (Karlstad) Jim Gates (College Park) Bernard Julia (ENS) Anatoli Klimyk (Kiev) Dmitri Leites (Stockholm) Jerzy Lukierski (Wroclaw) Folkert Muuller-Hoissen€ (Goottingen)€ Peter Van Nieuwenhuizen (Stony Brook) Antoine Van Proeyen (Leuven) Alice Rogers (King’s College) Daniel Hernandez Ruiperez (Salamanca) Martin Schlichenmaier (Mannheim) Albert Schwarz (Davis) Ergin Sezgin (Texas A&M) Mikhail Shifman (Minneapolis) Kellogg Stelle (Imperial) Idea, organizing and compiling by Steven Duplij CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SUPERSYMMETRY And noncommutative structures in mathematics and physics Edited by Steven Duplij Kharkov State University Warren Siegel State University of NY-SUNY and Jonathan Bagger Johns Hopkins University Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data ISBN-10 1-4020-1338-8 (HB) ISBN-13 978-1-4020-1338-6 (HB) Published by Springer, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. www.springeronline.com Printed on acid-free paper Reprinted with corrections, 2005 All Rights Reserved # 2005 Springer No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any forms or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. Printed in the Netherlands. Acknowledgements It is with great pleasure that I express my deep thanks to: high-level programming language expert Vladimir Kalashnikov (Forth, Perl, C) for his extensive help; to programmers Melchior Franz (LaTeX); Robert Schlicht (WinEdit), George Shepelev (Assem- bler), Eugene Slavutsky (Java), for their kindness in programming, especially for this volume; to Dmitry Kadnikov and Sergey Tolchenov for valuable help and information; and to Tatyana Kudryashova for checking my English.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis on Superspace: an Overview
    BULL. AUSTRAL. MATH. SOC. 58C50, 15A75, 17B70, 46S20, 81Q60 VOL. 50 (1994) [135-165] ANALYSIS ON SUPERSPACE: AN OVERVIEW VLADIMIR G. PESTOV The concept of superspace is fundamental for some recent physical theories, notably supersymmetry, and a mathematical feedback for it is provided by superanalysis and supergeometry. We survey the state of affairs in superanalysis, shifting our attention from supermanifold theory to "plain" superspaces. The two principal existing approaches to superspaces are sketched and links between them discussed. We examine a problem by Manin of representing even geometry (analysis) as a collective effect in infinite-dimensional purely odd geometry (analysis), by applying the technique of nonstandard (infinitesimal) analysis. FOREWORD "Superspace is the greatest invention since the wheel" (see [59]). I don't know how many of us would agree with this radical statement, and it was only intended to be a jocular epigraph, of course. However, the concept of superspace is thriving indeed in theoretical physics of our days. Under superspace physicists understand our space-time labeled not only with usual coordinates (x11), but also with anticommuting coordinates (0a), and endowed with a representation of a certain group or, better still, supergroup, whatever it means. The anticommuting coordinates represent certain internal degrees of freedom of the physical system. This concept was actually known in physics since the early 60s or late 50s [138, 138, 91, 28], but what made it so important was the discovery of supersymmetry [144, 131, 145], which is an essentially new form of symmetry unifying fermions (particles of matter) with bosons (particles carrying interaction between bosons).
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Berezin
    Мaquette de livre FELIX BEREZIN This book is about Felix Berezin, an outstanding Soviet mathematician who in the 1960s and 70s was the driving force behind the emergence of the branch of mathematics now known as supermathematics. The integral over the anticoomuting Grassman variables he introduced in the 1960’s laid the foundation for the path integral formulation of quantum field theory with fermions, the heart of modern supersymmetric field theories and superstrings. The Berezin integral is named for him as is the closely related construction of the Berezinian which may be regarded as the superanalog of the determinant. In a masterfully written memoir, Berezin’s widow, Elena Karpel, narrates a remarkable story of Berezin’s life and his struggle for survival in the totalitarian Soviet regime. This story is supple- Life and death of the mastermind mented by recollections of Berezin’s close friends and colleagues. Berezin’s accomplishments of Supermathematics in mathematics, his novel ideas and breakthrough works, are reviews in two articles written by Andrei Losev and Robert Minlos. edited by M. Shifman January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword iii FELIX BEREZIN LIFE AND DEATH OF THE MASTERMIND OF SUPERMATHEMATICS Edited by M. Shifman January 29, 2007 11:38 WSPC/Trim Size: 9in x 6in for Proceedings Foreword iv Copyright page The Editor and Publisher would like to thank the American Math- ematical Society for their kind permission to reprint the articles of V. Maslov, R. Minlos, M. Shubin, N. Vvedenskaya and the first article of A. Vershik from the American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, Advances in the Mathematical Sciences, Volume 175, 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • On Integration and Volumes of Supermanifolds
    ON INTEGRATION AND VOLUMES OF SUPERMANIFOLDS A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2021 Thomas M. Honey Department of Mathematics Contents Abstract 6 Declaration 7 Copyright Statement 8 Acknowledgements 9 1 Introduction and Review 10 1.1 The Usual Case . 11 1.1.1 The Grassmannian Manifolds . 11 1.1.2 The Grassmannian as a Homogeneous space . 13 1.1.3 The Unitary Group . 15 1.1.4 The Stiefel Manifolds and the Grassmannian . 16 1.1.5 Other Homogeneous Spaces . 17 1.1.6 Principal Bundle Structures . 18 1.1.7 Volumes of Homogeneous Spaces . 20 1.1.8 Volume of the Unitary Group . 21 1.1.9 Volume of the Flag Manifolds . 23 1.2 The Super Case: A Summary . 23 2 Supermanifolds 27 2.1 Smooth Supermanifolds . 28 2.1.1 Superdomains and Supermanifolds . 30 2.1.2 Integration on Supermanifolds . 36 2.2 The Grassmannian Supermanifold . 39 2.2.1 Complex Supermanifolds . 39 2 2.2.2 The Grassmannian supermanifolds . 41 3 Hermitian Forms and the Kronecker Product 44 3.1 Hermitian Forms . 45 3.1.1 Bilinear forms . 45 3.1.2 Superinvolutions . 48 3.1.3 Sesquilinear forms . 54 3.1.4 Hermitian forms over supercommutative rings . 56 3.1.5 Hermitian Form on hom(U; V )................... 59 3.1.6 Coordinates . 60 3.2 Linear Superalgebra . 69 3.2.1 Vectorisation and the Kronecker Product . 69 3.2.2 Vectorisation . 70 3.2.3 The Kronecker Product . 71 3.3 The Super Case .
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Education in Universities in the Soviet Union And
    sities and research centers or even in other Russian cities Mathematical Education in would regularly come to the seminars too. Seminar par- Universities in the Soviet ticipants would either present their own research or ex- plore the most recent results from abroad considered to be Union and Modern Russia important by seminar leaders. Soviet mathematicians, as well as the rest of the Soviet people, were typically not al- lowed to leave the country; Western mathematicians came Sergei Lando to Russia very rarely, and only a part of Western journals Professor of the Faculty of Mathematics, was available even in the best libraries, often after a serious National Research University time gap. Nevertheless, most of the important research re- Higher School of Economics, sults and theories reached the target audience. Practically Russian Federation all quickly developing domains of mathematics were well [email protected] represented at Mechmat in those years. During that period several Soviet mathematical journals Traditions of mathematical education in Russia on both that published quality papers were widely read all around school and university level, research done by Russian sci- the world, and many Western mathematicians decided to entists and its impact on the development of mathematics is study Russian in order to be able to read the Russian ver- considered by many a unique and valuable part of the world sions of the papers before their translations appear (which cultural heritage. In the present paper, we describe the de- could take some time). Publications in these journals were velopment of mathematical education in Russian universi- considered to be very honorable, and it was not an easy ties after 1955 — a period that proved to be most fruitful.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Dmitry Maximovitch Gitman August 31, 2010
    Curriculum Vitae Dmitry Maximovitch Gitman August 31, 2010 Contents 1 Personal information 1 2 Education and academic titles 2 3 Academic Positions 2 4 Didactic Activities 3 5 Orientation of students and post-docs 3 6 Books published and in progress 5 7 Selected articles 6 8 Number of publications and international citations 10 9 Coordination of projects and research group 10 10 Summary of the main scientific results obtained 11 10.1 Quantum field theory with external backgrounds . ............... 11 10.2 General theory of constrained systems and their quantization ............... 15 10.3 Exact solutions of the relativistic wave equations and theory of self-adjoint extensions . 18 10.4 Path integrals; group theory in relativistic quantum mechanics and field theory; semi- classical methods and coherent states . ........... 22 10.5 Classical and pseudoclassical relativistic particle models and their quantization . 25 10.6 Theoryofhigherspins . ......... 27 10.7 Theory of two and four levels systems and applications to the quantum computation . 28 10.8 Quantum mechanics and field theory in non-commutative spaces ............. 29 10.9 QuantumStatistics. ......... 30 10.10Othersubjects ................................. 31 1 Personal information Born on July 2, 1944, Tashkent, Uzbekistan - USSR Brazilian Citizenship Languages: Russian, English, Portuguese and German Address: Instituto de Física da USP, Departamento de Física Nuclear, Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P. 66318, CEP 05315-970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil Telephone: 55-11-3091-6948. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Homepage: http://www.dfn.if.usp.br/pesq/tqr/pt/gitman 1 2 Education and academic titles 1961-1966: Graduation and Master’s degree — Department of Physics of Tomsk State University • — Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Marinov Michael Marinov, the Theorist Who, with Felix Berezin
    Site Index Michael Marinov Michael Marinov, the theorist who, with Felix Berezin, introduced the classical description of spin by anticommuting Grassmann variables, died of cancer on 17 January in Haifa, Israel. Born on 4 July 1939 in Moscow, Marinov studied at Moscow University and received his PhD in 1966 from the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP). His PhD study was devoted to spinning particles--the subject various aspects of which he continued to investigate throughout his life. During his 14 years at ITEP, Marinov went through all the stages of an academic career, from junior to senior researcher. Marinov achieved worldwide recognition in the area of quantum field theory and related problems in mathematical physics. He had a deep understanding of the path integral method and used it extensively in his studies. Most theorists in the 1970s viewed this approach as rather symbolic compared to the operator method. Marinov analyzed the relation of the method to canonical quantization in his review on path integrals published in Physics Reports in 1980. With the path integral method, the transition from classical to quantum physics can be understood as integration over paths near classical trajectories. A uniform treatment of bosons and fermions in the path integrals is another advantage of this method, which is based on the representation of fermions through anticommuting Grassmann variables. Berezin was largely responsible for advancing the calculus, including integration, on these variables. In 1975, Berezin and Marinov introduced a novel extension of that concept--namely, a classical description of spin by Grassmann 1 variables. This idea sounds strange for spin- /2 particles: We are used to viewing their spin properties as quantum phenomena.
    [Show full text]