DOCSLIB.ORG

(Irrs) Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Irrs) Mission IAEA-NS-IRRS-2011/01 ORIGINAL: English INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS) MISSION TO ROMANIA Bucharest 17 to 28 January 2011 DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY i INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS) REPORT TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA Bucharest, Romania 17 to 28 January 2011 ii INTEGRATED REGULATORY REVIEW SERVICE (IRRS) REPORT TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA Mission date: 17 to 28 January 2011 Regulatory body: CNCAN Location: Bucharest, Romania Regulated facilities and Nuclear power plants; research reactors; fuel cycle facilities; medical, industrial practices: and research facilities, radioactive waste facilities, decommissioning and remediation. Organized by: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) IRRS REVIEW TEAM Greg Rzentkowski Team Leader (Canada) Olga Makarovska Deputy Team Leader (Ukraine) Robbie Gray (UK) Maria Helena Marechal (Brazil) Jarlath Duffy (Ireland) Seung-Young Jeong (South Korea) Kai Möller (Germany) Marina Nizamska (Bulgaria) Ronald Bellamy (United States of America) Matjaž Podjavoršek (Slovenia) Adeline Clos (France) Jan Husarcek (Slovakia) Miguel Santini (Canada) David Graves Team Coordinator (IAEA) Hazem Suman Deputy Team Coordinator (IAEA) Martyn Ubani Administrative Assistant (IAEA) Jeannot Boogaard Observer (IAEA) IAEA-2011 iii The number of recommendations, suggestions and good practices is in no way a measure of the status of the regulatory body. Comparisons of such numbers between IRRS reports from different countries should not be attempted. iv CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................3 II. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE ..............................................................................................................4 III. BASIS FOR THE REVIEW .............................................................................................................5 1. RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT ..........................................7 1.1. NATIONAL POLICY AND STRATEGY .........................................................................................7 1.2. ESTABLISHMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR SAFETY ..............................................................8 1.3. ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGULATORY BODY .........................................................................9 1.4. INDEPENDENCE OF THE REGULATORY BODY .....................................................................12 1.5. PRIME RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY .....................................................................................13 1.6. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY .....................13 1.7. COORDINATION OF DIFFERENT AUTHORITIES WITH RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SAFETY WITHIN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................14 1.8. PROVISION FOR DECOMMISSIONING OF FACILITIES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND SPENT FUEL ..........................................................................................15 1.9. COMPETENCE FOR SAFETY .......................................................................................................18 1.10. PROVISION OF TECHNICAL SERVICES ................................................................................18 2. GLOBAL NUCLEAR SAFETY REGIME ......................................................................................20 2.1. INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR COOPERATION .............20 2.2. SHARING OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE AND REGULATORY EXPERIENCE...................21 3. RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE REGULATORY BODY ............................23 3.1. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE REGULATORY BODY AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES ...............................................................................................................................................23 3.2. EFFECTIVE INDEPENDENCE DURING CONDUCT OF REGULATORY ACTIVITIES ........25 3.3. STAFFING AND COMPETENCE OF THE REGULATORY BODY ...........................................25 3.4. LIAISON WITH ADVISORY BODIES AND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS ............................27 3.5. LIAISON BETWEEN THE REGULATORY BODY AND AUTHORIZED PARTIES ................27 3.6. STABILITY AND CONSISTENCY OF REGULATORY CONTROL ..........................................27 3.7. SAFETY RELATED RECORDS .....................................................................................................28 3.8. COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION WITH INTERESTED PARTIES ........................29 4. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE REGULATORY BODY ....................................................30 5. AUTHORIZATION............................................................................................................................33 5.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................33 5.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS .........................................................................................................36 5.3. RESEARCH REACTORS ................................................................................................................37 5.4. FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES ............................................................................................................38 5.5. INDUSTRIAL, MEDICAL AND RESEARCH FACILITIES .........................................................39 5.6. WASTE FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................42 6. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT .........................................................................................................47 6.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................47 6.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND RESEARCH REACTORS ...................................................48 6.3. FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES ............................................................................................................51 6.4. INDUSTRIAL, MEDICAL AND RESEARCH FACILITIES .........................................................52 6.5. WASTE FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................53 v 7. INSPECTION......................................................................................................................................55 7.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................55 7.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS .........................................................................................................58 7.3. RESEARCH REACTORS ................................................................................................................60 7.4. FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES ............................................................................................................61 7.5. INDUSTRIAL, MEDICAL AND RESEARCH FACILITIES .........................................................62 7.6. WASTE FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................64 8. ENFORCEMENT ...............................................................................................................................65 8.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................65 8.2. INDUSTRIAL, MEDICAL AND RESEARCH FACILITIES .........................................................66 9. REGULATIONS AND GUIDES .......................................................................................................68 9.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................68 9.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS .........................................................................................................70 9.3. RESEARCH REACTORS ................................................................................................................70 9.4. FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES ............................................................................................................70 9.5. INDUSTRIAL, MEDICAL AND RESEARCH FACILITIES .........................................................70 9.6 WASTE FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................71 10. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE ................................................................73 10.1. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE ................................................................73 10.2. SYSTEM FOR PROTECTIVE ACTIONS TO REDUCE EXISTING OR UNREGULATED RADIATION RISK .....................................................................................................................................86 11. TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL .......................................................................88 11.1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................88
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hotararea Nr. 3 Din 27.02.2014
    Anexa 1 la Hotărârea nr. 3/27.02.2014 TERRAMARA INVESTMENT CONSULTANCY SRL Volumul I Raportul Studiului de Fezabilitate CONTINUT 1 Sumar Executiv 4 1.1 Sumar Executiv Proiect 4 2 Informatii Generale 4 2.1 Introducere in Studiul de Fezabilitate 4 2.2 Contextul Zonei de Proiect 5 3 Cadrul General al Poiectului 7 3.1 Documente Relevante pentru Proiect 7 Rezultate Master Plan, Studiu de Fezabilitate si Implementare 3.2 8 Aplicatie POS Mediu 2007 - 2013 3.3 Cadrul Natural in Zona Proiectului 12 Cadrul Natural 12 Relieful 12 Clima 13 Vegetatie, Flora, Fauna 13 Geologie si Hidrogeologie 14 Resurse Naturale 15 3.4 Evaluarea Socio - Economica 18 3.5 Cadrul Legal si Institutuional 20 Cadrul Legal 20 Cadrul Institutional 22 4 Analiza Situatiei Curente si Prognoze 24 4.1 Informatii Generale in Zona Proiectului 24 4.1.1 Infrastructura de Apa 24 4.1.1.1 – Sistemul Zonal de Alimentare cu Apa Calafat – Poiana Mare – 25 Ciupercenii Vechi 4.1.1.2 - Sistemul Zonal de Alimentare cu Apa Bailesti 29 4.1.1.3 - Sistemul Zonal de Alimentare cu Apa Filiasi 32 4.1.1.4 - Sistemul Zonal de Alimentare cu Apa Segarcea 34 4.1.2 Infrastructura de Apa Uzata 37 4.1.2.1 – Clusterul de Apa Uzata Calafat 39 4.1.2.2 – Clusterul de Apa Uzata Bailesti – Poiana Mare 42 4.1.2.3 – Clusterul de Apa Uzata Dabuleni – Calarasi - Bechet 46 4.1.2.4 – Clusterul de Apa Uzata Filiasi 52 4.1.2.5 – Clusterul de Apa Uzata Segarcea 55 5 Deversare Apa Uzata Industriala 59 5.1 Contextul Deversarilor de Ape Uzate Industriale 59 6 Managementul Namolului 59 6.1 Contextul Managementului Namolurilor
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Heavy Metals Existing in the Danube Wa- Ters in Turnu Severin – Bechet Section
    South Western Journal of Vol.2, No.1, 2011 Horticulture, Biology and Environment pp.47-55 P-Issn: 2067- 9874, E-Issn: 2068-7958 STUDY OF HEAVY METALS EXISTING IN THE DANUBE WA- TERS IN TURNU SEVERIN – BECHET SECTION Elena GAVRILESCU University of Craiova, Horticulture Faculty, A.I.Cuza Street, no. 13, Craiova, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Danube River Protection Convention and the Environment Programme of the Danube River Basin aim to the complex assessment of water quality at the national level and of its development trends in order to substantiate the measures and policies to reduce pollution, plus other pri- ority objectives as the quantification of the heavy metals content (Lack 1997). The monitored sections in the study, respectively Turnu Severin - Calafat - Bechet were part of the TNMN network for tracking the Danube water quality (Harmancioglu et al. 1997).The heavy metals are from both the upstream of Turnu Severin and from the Jiu River. After the study conducted in 2007-2009 there were found in some metals significant amounts of nickel, copper, chromium, arsenic and lead in particular. Key words: monitoring, heavy metals, aquatic ecosystem, water pollution, the Danube INTRODUCTION Danube represents the biggest water resource for Romania being more than double (85x109 cm/year) in comparison with the inland water (river and lakes), which represents about 40x109 cm/year, but the possibilities of their use in natural regime are limited because of different technical reasons (Botterweg & Rodda 1999). Even so the importance of the Danube health is of major concern for Romania as well as for other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tendances Hydroclimatiques Dans Le Sud-Ouest De La Roumanie Entre 1961 Et 2009
    XXVIIIe Colloque de l’Association Internationale de Climatologie, Liège 2015 TENDANCES HYDROCLIMATIQUES DANS LE SUD-OUEST DE LA ROUMANIE ENTRE 1961 ET 2009 PR ĂVĂLIE R. (1) , MITOF I. (1) , ZAHARIA L. (1) , BANDOC G. (1) (1) Université de Bucarest, Faculté de Géographie, 1 rue Nicolae B ălcescu, 010041, Bucarest, Roumanie [[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]] Résumé - Cette étude a pour but d’identifier les tendances hydroclimatiques durant la période 1961-2009 et la relation entre la variation de certains paramètres climatiques et hydrologiques, dans le sud-ouest de la Roumanie. Pour l’analyse des tendances, nous avons utilisé les tests statistiques Mann-Kendall/Sen’s slope, et pour l’évaluation des correlations, les tests Spearman et Student. Les résultats montrent une augmentation générale des valeurs annuelles du déficit climatique d’humidité, responsable d’une diminution générale des écoulements. À l’échelle saisonnière, la même situation se retrouve au printemps, en hiver et en été, tandis qu’en automne, la situation est généralement opposée. Les corrélations statistiques ont indiqué, en général, une liaison relativement étroite entre les paramètres hydroclimatiques ; les situations avec des corrélations faibles peuvent être expliquées par l’action d’autres facteurs (particulièrement anthropiques) qui ont influencé les écoulements dans les dernières décennies. Mots-clés : tendances, paramètres hydroclimatiques, Mann-Kendall, Sen’s slope, corrélations, le sud-ouest de la Roumanie. Abstract - Hydroclimatic trends in south-western Romania between 1961 and 2009. This paper aims to identify hydroclimatic trends between 1961 and 2009, and the relationship between the variation of certain climatic and hydrological parameters in south-western Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind Deflation from Sand Areas Affected by Atmosferic Dryness: Leu-Rotunda and Dăbuleni Fields (Oltenia Plain)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals THE WIND DEFLATION FROM SAND AREAS AFFECTED BY ATMOSFERIC DRYNESS: LEU-ROTUNDA AND DĂBULENI FIELDS (OLTENIA PLAIN) ROȘCA FLORINA CRISTINA 1, PETREA D.2 ABSTRACT. The wind deflation from sand areas affected by atmospheric dryness: Leu-Rotonda and Dăbuleni Fields (Oltenia Plain). Leu-Rotunda and Dăbuleni Fields are characterized by substantial extension of sandy soils. The sands on the left of Jiu are poli-stratificated fluvial deposits eolian shaped as dunes and interdunes. During the reported period 1980-2007, it was found that the most exposed time of the year to the wind was during the spring, the months of March, April and May as in speed and frequency. According to the analyzed data, the dominant wind direction during spring season on the sandy soils from Dăbuleni is the western, with negative effects on crops who then begin their vegetation cycle. The shelterbelts have decreased, although lately there have been numerous programs which aimed afforestation of affected areas. Keywords: The Leu-Rotunda and Dăbuleni Fields, wind deflation, CLC, shelterbelts. 1. INTRODUCTION The studies regarding to the south-eastern Oltenia Plain highlight in general negative aspects especially when in discussion are present risk climatic phenomena such as wind deflation. The two subunits, Leu-Rotunda Field and Dăbuleni Field are integral parts of Oltenia Plain (Fig. 1). In their turn also they are divided such as the natural subunits for the northern according to Coteţ (1957) we have the Jiu Plain with the plain flood Moor Green-Rojiştea, famous for its rich vegetation and abandoned meanders and Malu-Mare–Tâmbureşti Plain, a terraces plain drowned by dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Concentrations and Chemical Considerations
    Supporting Information for Radioactive Ruthenium from an Undeclared Major Nuclear Release in 2017, Part 1: Airborne Concentrations and Chemical Considerations Table of contents Table S1: Airborne 106Ru activity concentrations (mBq·m-3) 2 Table S2: Airborne 103Ru activity concentrations (mBq·m-3) and 103Ru/106Ru isotopic ratio 30 Table S3: Dry + wet fallout/deposition of 106Ru (Bq·m-2) and 106Ru activity concentrations in rainwater (Bq·L-1) 31 Table S4: 106Ru deposition on plant and soil (Bq·m-2 or Bq·kg-1 fresh) 34 Datasets used 36 Radioactive properties and use of 106Ru 36 Discussion of a possible satellite re-entry 36 Sequence of airborne 106Ru detections in Ukraine 37 Correction for plume duration 37 Chemistry of ruthenium and solubility experiments 38 Volatilization experiments 40 Imaging plate (IP) autoradiography 41 Scanning electron microscopic imaging of the filter surface 42 Gamma-ray spectrum 43 References 44 1 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907571116 Table S1: Airborne 106Ru activity concentrations (mBq·m-3). Results are usually given with 2. Uncertainty in %. Country Location Latitude Longitude Start Start End End 106Ru ± (decimal) (decimal) date hour date hour (mBq·m-3) (%) Austria Alt Prerau 48.7964 16.4753 25/09/17 04:03 02/10/17 04:09 11.1 8 Austria Alt Prerau 48.7964 16.4753 25/09/17 04:03 02/10/17 04:09 0.003 43 Austria Bregenz 47.5048 9.7264 25/09/17 04:40 02/10/17 07:00 <0.1 Austria Bregenz 47.5048 9.7264 26/09/17 04:40 03/10/17 07:00 <0.017 Austria Graz 47.0755 15.4505 25/09/17 09:53 02/10/17 06:20 9.1 6 Austria
    [Show full text]
  • Rata De Incidență Pe Localități (Actualizare: 31 Martie), Comunicată De CNCCI (Centrul Național De Conducere Și Coordonare a Intervenției) Nr.Crt
    Rata de incidență pe localități (actualizare: 31 martie), comunicată de CNCCI (Centrul Național de Conducere și Coordonare a Intervenției) Nr.Crt. Județ Localitate Incidenta 1 ALBA RIMETEA 21,00 2 ALBA SĂLCIUA 6,98 3 ALBA ŞONA 6,42 4 ALBA ORAŞ OCNA MUREŞ 6,37 5 ALBA MUNICIPIUL AIUD 6,18 6 ALBA MUNICIPIUL ALBA IULIA 6,1 7 ALBA NOŞLAC 6,05 8 ALBA LIVEZILE 5,8 9 ALBA STREMŢ 5,74 10 ALBA GALDA DE JOS 5,58 11 ALBA UNIREA 5,07 12 ALBA MIRĂSLĂU 5,05 13 ALBA DOŞTAT 4,91 14 ALBA CIUGUD 4,9 15 ALBA GÂRBOVA 4,64 16 ALBA BLANDIANA 4,39 17 ALBA LOPADEA NOUĂ 4,24 18 ALBA PIANU 4,19 19 ALBA METEŞ 3,95 20 ALBA MUNICIPIUL BLAJ 3,61 21 ALBA ŞUGAG 3,47 22 ALBA IGHIU 3,13 23 ALBA LUNCA MUREŞULUI 3,1 24 ALBA CRICĂU 3 25 ALBA ORAŞ CUGIR 2,88 26 ALBA ORAŞ CÂMPENI 2,87 27 ALBA CIURULEASA 2,62 28 ALBA MUNICIPIUL SEBEŞ 2,61 29 ALBA ALMAŞU MARE 2,44 30 ALBA RĂDEŞTI 2,32 31 ALBA ŞPRING 2,29 32 ALBA ORAŞ ABRUD 2,28 33 ALBA BUCERDEA GRÂNOASĂ 2,2 34 ALBA SĂSCIORI 2,15 35 ALBA BUCIUM 2,11 36 ALBA BERGHIN 2,08 37 ALBA ŞIBOT 2,07 38 ALBA VINŢU DE JOS 2 39 ALBA SÂNTIMBRU 1,98 40 ALBA DAIA ROMÂNĂ 1,92 41 ALBA SÂNCEL 1,92 42 ALBA ÎNTREGALDE 1,76 43 ALBA ORAŞ TEIUŞ 1,52 44 ALBA PONOR 1,5 45 ALBA CÂLNIC 1,49 46 ALBA LUPŞA 1,36 47 ALBA FĂRĂU 1,34 48 ALBA ORAŞ BAIA DE ARIEŞ 1,31 49 ALBA SĂLIŞTEA 1,27 50 ALBA VALEA LUNGĂ 1,27 51 ALBA MIHALŢ 1,23 52 ALBA ALBAC 1,01 53 ALBA JIDVEI 0,94 54 ALBA HOPÂRTA 0,87 55 ALBA VADU MOŢILOR 0,75 56 ALBA ROŞIA MONTANĂ 0,73 57 ALBA SCĂRIŞOARA 0,64 58 ALBA ORAŞ ZLATNA 0,63 59 ALBA ROŞIA DE SECAŞ 0,62 60 ALBA ARIEŞENI 0,61 61 ALBA CERGĂU 0,61 62
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal on Humanistic Ideology
    THE INFLUENCE OF MEDITERRANEAN CYCLONES ON THE WEATHER IN OLTENIA DURING THE FIRST MONTH OF SUMMER SFÎRLEAZĂ FANIA 1, BĂCESCU M.1, BURADA CRISTINA1, BRÂNCUȘ MIHAELA1, IORDĂCHESCU Ş.1 ABSTRACT. The influence of Mediterranean cyclones on the weather in Oltenia during the first month of summer. Defining the Mediterranean cyclones as “semi-permanent centers” active only in the cold half of the year would suggest that they are not active in summer, and their influence on the weather of southern Europe and Romania is insignificant during this season. The statistical- climatological study presented in this paper shows that the daily frequency of occurrence of the Mediterranean cyclones during the month of June in the period 1981-2010, which influenced the weather in Oltenia, is 8%. Thus, they can be active all year round and can cause episodes of severe weather, depending on the position of other baric centers (the Azores High, The Icelandic Depression). Climatological aspects were investigated using meteorological data for June in the period 1981-2010, available from the quality check database of National Meteorological Administration, Bucharest. For describing the general context, climatological data was used to provide a global overview. Reanalysis data of sea- level pressure and geopotential height at 500 hPa, available from NOOA- NCEP/NCAR, were also used. Keywords: Mediterranean cyclones, cyclonic trajectories, severe weather, Oltenia 1. INTRODUCTION The Mediterranean cyclones play a very important role in the geographical space of Southern and South-Eastern Europe, not only in the appearance and evolution of the weather and but also in determining the climatic features. The Mediterranean region is one of the most important cyclogenetic regions for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bechet, Dolj County)
    LAND USE RECONVERSION IN THE DROUGHT – AND ARIDITY –AFFECTED AREAS IN SW ROMANIA (BECHET, DOLJ COUNTY) IULIANA VIJULIE 1, ELENA MATEI, GABRIELA MANEA, LAURA TÎRL Ă, ROXANA CUCULICI Abstract In the terms of current climate change, reconversion of land use in the drought-and aridity- affected south-western Romania, is an issue of utmost priority. Thus, the present study aim represents a diachronic analysis of the land use within the Bechet town area and proposes viable solutions for soil drought and aridity mitigation. Since 1989, uncontrolled and abusive logging affected the black locust forest areas, enabling the sand dunes expansion and causing ecological disturbance. The main research methods were: field observation, statistical-mathematical methods and GIS mapping. The analysis of topographic maps and orthophotographs in 1970 to 2008 revealed a very low spatial distribution of both the forest shelterbelts and shelterwoods. We proposed a reconstruction of these forest areas, which today can no longer perform their fundamental function of land protection, because of intensive degradation. The positive consequences on long term would be the mitigation of climate change impact and prevention of further land degradation. Key-words: land use, dune, aridity, land degradation, shelterbelt, restoration. Introduction Romania is one of the countries having a number of regions prone to edaphic drought and aridity (south and south-east of the Wallachian Plain, south of Moldavian Plateau and Dobrudja). These phenomena were caused by the summer droughts triggered both by some climatic disturbances, and the decrease of forested areas and forest belts in the lowlands (Cost ăchescu et al ., 2010; Achim et al ., 2012; Vijulie et al ., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • S I T U a Ţ I a Drumurilor Judetene in Administrare
    S.C. P.L.D.P. DOLJ S.A. S I T U A Ţ I A DRUMURILOR JUDETENE IN ADMINISTRARE Poziţiile kilometrice Lungimea sectorului pe tipuri de Categoria şi nr. Drumului, localitatea de Inceput şi de Sfârşit, Nr. ale sectorului de îmbrăcăminţi Localităţi între care este localităţile principale pe traseu, lungimea totală pe traseu, crt. drum (de la km … la Îmbrăcăminţi cuprins sectorul de drum lungimea totală în km - ÎN ADMINISTRARE - Pietruit Pământ km… ) asfaltice DJ 542 16+000 – 45+170 29,170 Zvorsca – Dăbuleni Lim. Jud. Olt – Zvorsca – Amărăştii de Sus – Amărăştii de Jos – 1 Dăbuleni (DN 54) L = 27,450 KM TOTAL = 16+000 – 45+170 29,170 DJ 551 0+000 – 1+500 1,500 Sadova (DN 55) - 2 Sadova (DN55) – Mânăstirea Sadova Mânăstirea Sadova L = 1,500 KM TOTAL = 0+000 – 1+500 1,500 DJ 551A 0+000 – 9+500 9,500 Bratovoişti-Puţuri 3. Bratovoieşti-Gioroc-Puţuri L = 9,500 KM TOTAL = 0+000 – 9+500 9,500 DJ 551B 0+000-2,850 2,850 Listeava-Ostroveni 4. Listeava(DN55)-Ostroveni(DN55A) L=2,850 km TOTAL= 0+000-2,850 2,850 DJ 551C 0+000-1+200 1,200 DN55-Preajba DN55-Preajba-Carcea 1+200-7+000 5,800 Preajba-Carcea 5. 7+000-8+120 1,120 Carcea L=8,120 km TOTAL 0+000-8+120 1,200 1.120 5,800 DJ 552 0+000 – 71+606 71,606 Craiova-Cetate Craiova – Mofleni - Bucovăţ – Italieni – Terpeziţa – Sălcuţa – 6. Plopşor - Vârtop – Caraula - Cetate L = 67,106 KM TOTAL = 0+000 – 71+606 71,606 DJ 552A 0+000 - 17+000- 17,000 Criva –Dragoia DJ 552 – Criva – Vârvoru de Jos – Ciutura – Dragoia– 17+000 - 26+600- 9,600 Dragoia-Mărăcine Tencănău - Mârza – Mărăcinele – Perişor – Cetăţuia – Cioroiaşi 26+600 - 52+000- 25,400 Perişor – Covei 7.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDEŢUL DOLJ Cu Reşedinţa În Municipiul Craiova
    JUDEŢUL DOLJ cu reşedinţa în municipiul Craiova Municipii............................ 3 Oraşe ............................... 4 Localități componente ale municipiilor și ale orașelor......... 12 Comune .............................. 104 Sate ................................ 378 - din care, aparțin de municipii și orașe ...................... 14 A. MUNICIPII ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nr. Denumirea Localităţi componente Sate ce aparţin crt. municipiului ale municipiului municipiului ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CRAIOVA 1. CRAIOVA 1. Cernele 2. Făcăi 2. Cernele de Sus 3. Mofleni 3. Izvorul Rece 4. Popoveni 4. Rovine 5. Şimnicu de Jos 2. BĂILEŞTI 1. BĂILEŞTI - 2. Balasan - 3. CALAFAT 1. CALAFAT 1. Basarabi 2. Ciupercenii Vechi 3. Golenţi B. ORAŞE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nr. Denumirea Localităţi componente Sate ce aparţin crt. oraşului ale oraşului oraşului ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BECHET 1. BECHET - 2. DĂBULENI 1. DĂBULENI 1. Chiaşu 3. FILIAŞI 1. FILIAŞI 1. Almăjel 2. Bîlta 3. Branişte 4. Fratoştiţa 5. Răcarii de Sus 6. Uscăci 4. ȘEGARCEA 1. ȘEGARCEA - 1 C. COMUNE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nr. Denumirea Satele crt. comunei componente ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Afumaţi 1. Afumaţi 2. Boureni 3. Covei 2. Almăj 1. Almăj 2. Bogea 3. Moşneni
    [Show full text]
  • Preserved in the Patrimony of the Oltenia Museum Craiova (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Juin Vol. LIV (1) pp. 105–114 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0008-0 NEW DATA ON CETONIIDAE SPECIES (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEOIDEA) PRESERVED IN THE PATRIMONY OF THE OLTENIA MUSEUM CRAIOVA (ROMANIA) CORNELIA CHIMIªLIU, GIMA MOGOªEANU Abstract. The paper includes new data concerning the species Cetoniidae family preserved in the patrimony of the Oltenia Museum Craiova. The examined material (1029 specs) was collected between 1951-2009 from 55 sites, mostly from Oltenia and two sites from Constanþa county. 17 of the 19 species and subspecies previously known in this area have been identified. The Protaetia (Netocia) cuprea metallica (Herbst, 1782) subspecies is mentioned for the first time in the fauna of Oltenia. The identification of the Oxythyrea cinctella (Schaum, 1841) reconfirms the presence of this species in the Romanian fauna. The only mention of this species belongs to Panin (1957). The following species have not been found again: Protaetia (Netocia) fieberi (Kraatz, 1880) and P. (Netocia) ungarica (Herbst, 1790) which were previously mentioned in the museum patrimony (Chimiºliu, 1999). At present, in the fauna of Oltenia 20 species and subspecies are confirmed, out of which 19 are preserved in the patrimony of the Oltenia Museum of Craiova. Résumé. Le travail comprend de nouvelles données concernant les espèces de la famille des Cetoniidae conservées dans le patrimoine du Musée de l’Olténie. Le matériel analysé (1029 exemplaires) a été prélevé entre les années 1951-2009 en 55 sites des départements de l’Olténie et en deux sites du département Constanþa. On a identifié 17 des 19 espèces déjà connues de ces zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Soil Erosion Susceptibility Using Gis Techniques Within the Danube Floodplain, the Calafat - Turnu Măgurele Sector (Romania)
    THEORY AND METHODS OF NATURAL HAZARDS RESEARCH UDC: 912:551.053:007(498) DOI: 10.2298/IJGI1303073I MAPPING SOIL EROSION SUSCEPTIBILITY USING GIS TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE DANUBE FLOODPLAIN, THE CALAFAT - TURNU MĂGURELE SECTOR (ROMANIA) Oana Ionuş*, Sandu Boengiu1*, Mihaela Licurici*, Liliana Popescu*, Daniel Simulescu* *University of Craiova, Romania – Geography Department Received 02 August 2013; reviewed 20 September 2013; accepted 01 October 2013 Abstract: The Danube floodplain, the Calafat – Turnu Măgurele sector, through its main features (topographic and climatic characteristics, land use and soil type) and human activities, constitutes an area exposed to soil erosion. The main objective of the present research is to map soil erosion susceptibility using the GIS techniques for the computation and representation of areas, which are exposed to soil erosion correlated with the field data for the validation. Analyzing the entire model, the relatively simple methodology, the database consistence, the comparability of the results with the existent soil erosion values at national and local scale, we can say that the model was applied with success in the studied area (areas and classes of water erosion susceptibility: very low, low, moderate, high - Ciupercenii Noi, Desa, Măceşu de Jos, Grojdibodu, Orlea, very high - Rast, Negoi, Catane, Bistreţ, Goicea; areas and classes of wind erosion susceptibility: very low, low, moderate - Ciupercenii Noi, Dăbuleni, Ianca, high - Calafat, Poiana Mare, Desa, Goicea, Piscu Vechi, very high - Poiana Mare, Rast, Negoi, Bistreţ, Gighera, Orlea. The soil erosion susceptibility map can be useful for planning erosion control measures and for selecting suitable sites for runoff plot experiments. Keywords: the Danube floodplain, soil, water erosion, wind erosion, database, GIS analysis, susceptibility Introduction In the context of environmental protection, most concerns about erosion are related to accelerated erosion, where the natural rate has been significantly increased mostly by human activity.
    [Show full text]