Bishop Rotary Valve Engine

Advanced Engine Technology The Bishop Rotary Valve by Tony Wallis, Bishop Innovation To demonstrate the credibility of Bishop Innovation’s new rotary valve technology it joined forces with Mercedes-Ilmor to develop the technology for use on their V10 Formula One engine only to have its strategy destroyed by a change in engine regulations. 10% power By the early 1990s Bishop Inno- offered by the rotary valve. Fur- ney Australia. Bishop was respon- advantage vation had completed the initial ther, a successful public demon- sible for the cylinder head design, and improved development of its promising new stration of this technology in the development and demonstration durability rotary valve concept for IC en- extreme operating conditions of of the required durability and per- gines and was looking for a way F1 provided a mechanism to ad- formance. By late 2000 back to to further develop the technology. dress the industry’s prejudice. back testing with the poppet valve The automotive industry, having In 1997 Bishop started work- single cylinder engine demon- observed a succession of failed at- ing with Ilmor Engineering (later strated a 10% power advantage tempts spanning the last century, Mercedes-Ilmor) to develop their and improved durability. In 2002 no longer believed the rotary rotary valve technology for F1 the first V10 engines using this valve concept was mechanically engines. The initial development technology were built and tested viable. It chose Formula One (F1), was carried out on 300cc single exhaustively. A completely new as the criteria for success was well cylinder bottom ends supplied by V10 engine was designed and matched to inherent advantages Ilmor at Bishop’s premises in Syd- manufactured in 2003. Testing of these engines was prematurely terminated when the FIA an- nounced changes to Article 5.1.5 Figure 1: of the engine regulations late in Valve drive train 2004 with the specific purpose of and inlet tract banning this rotary valve tech- arrangement on nology. V10 engine. The Technology The F1 rotary valve assembly is shown in Figure 2. The Bishop Rotary Valve (BRV) is an axial flow rotating valve incorporating both the inlet and exhaust port in the same valve. There is one valve per cylinder positioned with its axis perpendicular to that of the crankshaft. The steel valve is sup- ported in two shell type needle roller bearings that ensure the valve’s stepped centre portion al- ways runs with a small radial clearance to the housing. The outside diameter of the valve’s centre portion and the bearings are similar, allowing the valve assembly to be housed in a stepless bore. Face seals located at each end of the valve’s centre portion prevent cooling and lubrication oil enter- ing the centre portion and the cylinder. At the exhaust end a carbon face seal keeps the oil and 2 Motorsport Technology Advanced Engine Technology Figure 2: F1 rotary to accommodate local distortion, valve assembly. resulted in high friction and seizure. In the BRV arrangement the small radial clearance between the valve’s periphery and its housing is designed to ensure that any thermal or mechanically in- exhaust gas sep- duced distortion of the valve is arate while at the in- accommodated without the let end a lip seal separates valve’s periphery ever touching the inlet air and oil. The valve is its housing. Provided the radial driven by a gear at the inlet end. exposed to the clearance is kept small it provides The outside diameter of the combustion process sufficient flow resistance to pre- valve generally lies in the range it is inevitable that thermal and vent significant flow of gases be- 0.67 - 0.74 that of the cylinder mechanical distortion of the valve tween the exhaust and inlet port. bore diameter allowing it to be will occur. Bishop focused on In applications where fitted to engines with convention- finding a solution that would this is not the case al cylinder bore spacings. allow this small but inevitable The valve rotates at half en- distortion to be accommo- gine speed and eliminates the in- dated. In arrangements Figure 3: ertia induced forces that have where both the inlet and Gas sealing plagued the development of re- exhaust port are in the arrangement. ciprocating poppet valve mecha- same valve, a satisfacto- nisms since the invention of the ry solution is complicat- IC engine. It is this feature that ed by the requirement has inspired numerous inventors to prevent leakage be- over the last century to chance tween these ports. A their hand at developing rotary typical previous ap- valve engines. These develop- proach was to use a ments have generally failed due stationary split sleeve locat- to a combination of problems in- ed around and lightly preloaded volving gas sealing, oil sealing, against the valve’s periphery. In excessive friction and seizure such arrangements it was very caused by thermal and mechani- difficult to create an even distri- Bishop has developed additional cal distortion of the valve. bution of oil between the valve technology to control these flows. As a portion of the rotary surface and the sleeve. This, com- This approach was immediately valve’s periphery is periodically bined with the sleeves poor ability successful and allowed the early development to proceed without seizure, friction or lubrication problems. The gas sealing arrangement is shown in Figure 3. It consists of 2 axial seals and 2 circumferential seals located adjacent the window, housed in slots in the cylinder head and preloaded against the periphery of the valve. These seals function in a similar manner to piston rings. Unlike the piston ring they are subjected to a con- stant sliding velocity with no re- versal of direction throughout the cycle. This arrangement allows the use of very long windows, an essential requirement if the breathing potential of this concept is to be achieved. Window length determines the opening and closing rate of the valve and the fully open flow area. The opening and closing rates on modern F1 engines are very high Figure 4: CFD of production valve showing oblique flow through window and the and can only be matched by ro- start of tumble flow. tary valves which have window Special AutoTechnology 3 Advanced Engine Technology peak flow capacity of these valves increases linearly with valve diameter. By selecting a suitable valve diameter, peak VE can be achieved at what ever speed is required. CFD simulations suggest that valves could be produced that enable peak VE to be main- tained at speeds up to 25,000 rpm. Further increases are unlikely as it is difficult to make the inlet tract short enough to achieve the cor- rect wave action. Whilst the rotary valve engine has demonstrated breathing capacity that is at least equivalent to the best F1 poppet valve engines, it has the huge advantage that it does this without the dra- matic reduction in life that occurs with F1 poppet valve heads. As inertia induced loads in the valve Figure 5: Single Cylinder BRV engine on Bishop’s 18,500 rpm dynamometer. train are absent in the rotary valve, the forces that destroy the poppet valve heads are also ab- In axial flow ro- lengths greater than 0.77 that of tumble flow. The tumble ratio on sent. Further the mechanical and tary valves the air the cylinder bore diameter. engines with near square gas loads seen by the valve are flow through most In axial flow rotary valves the bore/stroke ratios is typically essentially independent of speed. of the inlet tract is air flow through most of the inlet twice that reported for similar 4 The only issue affecting durabili- parallel to the tract is parallel to the window and valve engines. Unlike the poppet ty that changes with engine speed window and per- perpendicular to the cylinder axis. valve this high tumble flow is is the peripheral speed of the seal- pendicular to the This is quite unlike poppet valve generated without any loss of vol- ing elements and the bearings. As cylinder axis arrangements and often leads their umetric efficiency (VE) and is re- the peripheral speed of the valve designers to incorrectly conclude sponsible for very fast burn rates over the sealing elements is ap- that the rotary valve cannot observed. Production based en- proximately 80% that of the max- breathe as well as the poppet valve. gines built in the early 1990’s had imum F1 piston ring velocity, this In the Bishop design much of ignition timing of 15°, or less than is of little concern. In production the air passes obliquely through half that of the best four valve en- poppet valve engines, engine life the window. This is well illustrated gines. considerations require changes in the CFD image shown in Figure that greatly curtail their breathing 4. The air flow adjacent the port The Testing capacity from the level achieved floor is turned through approxi- in F1. This is clearly not the case mately 35° before it passes Extensive back to back testing with the rotary valve and Bishop’s through the window while the air demonstrated that the peak volu- research suggests a production adjacent the port roof is turned metric efficiency was the same for rotary valve has a breathing ca- through approximately 90°. As all both poppet and rotary valve en- pacity up to 45% greater than the flow must at some stage be gines. The difference, if any, oc- that observed on current 4 valve turned parallel to the cylinder ax- curs in the engine speed at which production engines.

Load more