Planning for Waterside Bungalows/Chalets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning for Waterside Bungalows/Chalets Planning for waterside bungalows/chalets Bure at Hoveton Planning for waterside bungalows/chalets This guide outlines the history of Early tourists waterside bungalow/chalets and the contribution they make within the Waterside bungalow/chalets are part of Broads, discusses their similarities the unique Broads landscape. Most of and differences, and suggests ways to the bungalow/chalets we see today stem maintain and alter existing bungalow/ from holidaymaking in the Broads from chalets and insert new bungalow/chalets the 1880s to the 1960s. They are a distinct successfully within their particular group of buildings which significantly historic and landscape setting. For contribute to our understanding of the the purposes of this guide, the term history of the Broads. In the late 1800s, Bungalow/chalet relates to small/ if you had some disposable income, what low light-weight buildings which are better way to dispose of it than on a generally at the water’s edge. waterside bungalow/chalet in the Broads? Waterside bungalow/chalets were initially Part 1: Changing perceptions built for this expanding holiday market consisting mainly of affluent city dwellers Waterside bungalow/chalets undoubtedly who sought refuge within the wild and make an impact on the character of the undeveloped Broads in the late 19th and riverbank. Historically there was concern early 20th century. The growth of tourism that in some locations this was starting in the Broads was closely linked to the to become negative. For example back in establishment of railway stations within 1982 the Broads Authority was keen to the Victorian period and some of the most remove some of the bungalow/chalets on popular areas for waterside bungalow/ the River Thurne at Potter Heigham and chalets were around villages with links to Martham. Residents disagreed and the major towns and cities, and those which bungalow/chalets remained. Over time the offered existing recreational facilities. contribution that the bungalow/chalets make to the character of the area began Entrepreneurs to be more widely appreciated. When in 2015 the Authority, in consultation with Opportunity existed and an influential local residents, wished to add waterside group of Broads entrepreneurs, boat bungalow/chalets to its Local List, 58 builders and hirers, started providing waterside bungalow/chalets, including a tourist facilities that offered alternatives number on the River Thurne, were given to boating. People such as John Loynes the status and protection of local heritage of Wroxham and Herbert Woods of Potter assets. Heigham had captured early tourists with their boat offer and unsurprisingly other tourist facilities, including bungalow/ chalets, were erected in areas in close proximity to the popular boat hirers. Planning for waterside bungalows/chalets Belaugh Wartime use of Bungalow/chalets Many local people of the time were not comfortable with seeing the bungalow/ The two world wars brought new uses chalets being developed and what was for the bungalow/chalets. On occasion then considered the local distinctiveness of people from some of the larger towns in the area being eroded. Wider social issues the area, such as Great Yarmouth, used such as divisions between the early tourists the bungalow/chalets as permanent and the less affluent local people may residences when their main homes were have exacerbated this divide in opinion. under greater threat from bombing. There is also evidence of a bungalow/ Location, location, location chalet in Wroxham, Closeburn, being used as a Red Cross unit for recuperating The bungalow/chalets are unevenly soldiers. Within this period the bungalow/ distributed throughout the Broads, with chalets in some areas also started to high densities in some villages such as be used more generally as permanent Wroxham, Hoveton, Horning, Potter residences, resulting in the mix of use we Heigham and Brundall. They are also see today, as both holiday and permanent predominantly a feature of the northern accommodation. broads. Several factors contributed to this, such as the location of early railway Controversial assets stations and main boatyards, and the distance to larger centres of population. As with many forms of development, Another important factor was one of the bungalow/chalets were not without aesthetics. It was the undulating and controversy. The bungalow/chalets were wooded landscape in the upper reaches of some of the original second homes – the Broads that was particularly attractive built not for local people, but for visitors. to tourists of the time. Planning for waterside bungalows/chalets Natural habitat included regular, well-proportioned features. The roof was usually the In some instances bungalow/chalets dominant feature with generously situated in a more natural habitat of reeds overhanging low eaves and overhanging and trees were surrounded by vegetation gables. The early bungalow/chalets were which allowed even quite large buildings generally were single storey and not to fit less conspicuously into the Broads raised off the land. As issues with flooding landscape. Individual or small groups became apparent (for example River of trees could be seen on the plots and levels at Potter Heigham have risen) the planting was typically natural, avoiding bungalow/chalets were raised on piles to regular spacing and formal borders. The avoid seasonal flooding. dominant surface on river frontage was grass. Bungalow/chalets were sometimes On the River Bure boathouses were set back from the water’s edge on their often integral to the design, sometimes plot allowing natural vegetation to develop with the boathouse below and the living at the waterside. This natural vegetation accommodation above. Treatment at the and untrimmed edges supported the waterside varied but often the banks were growth of wild flowers and contributed retained by timber quay heading or natural to a natural appearance which also had banks in the calmer reaches of the system. benefits for wildlife. Our Planning for Traditionally mooring was provided off- Biodiversity guide (available on our river, within the plot of each bungalow/ website) suggests ways in which new chalet. This offered more protection to developments can encourage wildlife. boats, with less potential for obstruction to navigation. Historically, many of the leased On the waterfront plots at Thurne had neither boat dock or The age and design of the bungalow/ bungalow/chalet on them. Our Mooring chalets varies across the Broad with the Design Guide (available on our website) more elaborate qualities of the bungalow/ will be helpful for new developments and chalets upstream at Wroxham and the modifications. smaller and simpler looking bungalow/ A sense of proportion chalets downstream at Potter Heigham. Bungalow/chalets siting right on the The scale and density of the bungalow/ waterfront, such as those on the River chalets varied significantly across the Thurne, were traditionally simple in shape; Broads, as did their design – they possess the size and shape of these properties certain characteristics across different was determined by the size and shape of areas. The bungalow/chalets at Wroxham, the rand (that piece of land between river Hoveton and to a certain extent Horning and soke dyke). Typical characteristics that were constructed with a thatched roof of bungalow/chalets across the Broads and false timber framing had a ‘romantic’ Planning for waterside bungalows/chalets character typical of the wider Arts and Simple and fun Crafts Movement. Larger, more elaborate examples were built at Wroxham, within The bungalow/chalets often had a lower densities, set in larger wooded plots, sense of fun, reflecting holiday use, and therefore exhibiting a more exclusive sympathy for the landscape and their feel. Simpler and smaller bungalow/ location close to the waterside. All of the chalets were built in settlements such as bungalow/chalets were lightweight in Potter Heigham, within higher densities construction and timber predominated and smaller plots. Simpler and smaller as a building material for many elements. bungalow/chalets which were cheap Some were constructed on piles driven to construct were built in settlements into the ground or conctrete pads to form such as Potter Heigham, within higher a foundation. Others were constructed densities and smaller plots. However they on timber rafts or concrete rafts e.g. were often still beautifully designed, Whiteselea lodge. Walls were often with hints of Arts and Crafts and Art constructed with a timber frame and were Nouveau detailing. A greater variety of clad with timber, painted white or stained design and styles can be seen at Potter dark. Planed tongue-and-groove boards Heigham and the bungalow/chalets in were used, or rougher timber featheredge this area are more individual; one is even or waney-edged boarding. On most early constructed from a helter-skelter from the examples the roofs were thatched in local Britannia Pier at Great Yarmouth. Horning, reed, but others had metal sheet roofs a settlement in the middle reaches, such as corrugated iron and later felt roofs displayed characteristics of both styles of were also used. Boundary fences were development. designed to blend with their surroundings and have a minimal impact. Traditional fencing materials included cleft chestnut fencing and hurdles made from close woven osiers, hazel wattle or reeds. Local sources Local manufacturers developed their own vernacular style of simple, lightweight timber buildings,
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK MINK PROJECT Annual Newsletter 7, January – December 2019 *** Website ***
    NORFOLK MINK PROJECT Annual Newsletter 7, January – December 2019 *** Website https://thenorfolkminkproject.org.uk/ *** 2019 STATISTICS Total Mink Caught 78 Rafts Deployed 465 Traps on Loan 449 * Our website is now regularly used by the public to report Volunteers Involved sightings * 305 It has been another busy year for the project and, although the number of mink caught has gone back up again compared to last year (50), we still have far fewer mink in the county than when the project started. However, an increase always leaves me wondering if we missed a number last year or are we improving our control? The answer is likely to be, a bit of both! Some of the increase is due to the project now having more resource in the far west of the county, with new areas being trapped, and also an improvement in efficiency through the increased use of automated trap monitoring devices. Also, at our current level of control, we miss some mink each year that will go on to breed and there is a degree of immigration. To protect our wildlife from mink we have two options, either continue with control indefinite- ly or, if it is feasible, to try and eradicate them. Eradication completely removes the threat to native species and will be much less costly in the long term, but is it possible? For a num- ber of reasons we believe that the time is now right to go for eradication and this is set out in more detail later. But first we should look at what we achieved together in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Canoe and Kayak Licence Requirements
    Canoe and Kayak Licence Requirements Waterways & Environment Briefing Note On many waterways across the country a licence, day pass or similar is required. It is important all waterways users ensure they stay within the licensing requirements for the waters the use. Waterways licences are a legal requirement, but the funds raised enable navigation authorities to maintain the waterways, improve facilities for paddlers and secure the water environment. We have compiled this guide to give you as much information as possible regarding licensing arrangements around the country. We will endeavour to keep this as up to date as possible, but we always recommend you check the current situation on the waters you paddle. Which waters are covered under the British Canoeing licence agreements? The following waterways are included under British Canoeing’s licensing arrangements with navigation authorities: All Canal & River Trust Waterways - See www.canalrivertrust.org.uk for a list of all waterways managed by Canal & River Trust All Environment Agency managed waterways - Black Sluice Navigation; - River Ancholme; - River Cam (below Bottisham Lock); - River Glen; - River Great Ouse (below Kempston and the flood relief channel between the head sluice lock at Denver and the Tail sluice at Saddlebrow); - River Lark; - River Little Ouse (below Brandon Staunch); - River Medway – below Tonbridge; - River Nene – below Northampton; - River Stour (Suffolk) – below Brundon Mill, Sudbury; - River Thames – Cricklade Bridge to Teddington (including the Jubilee
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • History-Of-The-BSC-For-Golden-Jubilee-By-Philip-Page.Pdf
    ‘In the beginning’… by Philip Page, Founder Member Blakeney Sailing Club is 50 years old, but its roots go back many years before 1939. Annual Regattas have been held since 1863, apart from the War years, but in the early days most of the boats were ships’ boats. By early 1900’s many local families, and a few annual visitors, had sailing boats of their own, but these were usually sailed by professionals – mostly fishermen – who were employed by a family in a similar way to a gardener or groom. By 1910 or thereabouts, members of some of the regular visitors –families who bought houses in Blakeney and spent their holidays here – decided to form their own club and the Blakeney Amateur Sailing Club was founded by the Evans, Cookes, Agnews, Scotts, Murdochs and others. Only the Cookes remain and a member of the fourth generation, Arthur, paddles his own canoe now.) The Amateur Sailing Club consisted only of its own Committee and never had any ordinary members; its only function was to put on three races on succeeding days each August for Seniors and Juniors – (these terms referred to Boat Lengths and not the ages of helmsmen!) Handicaps were fixed by the committee on a personal basis. Hardly any two boats were the same before classes came into being in the Thirties. It was widely believed by most participants that the handicaps favoured the committee members! The course was extended to go round the Regatta Course twice in effect i.e. 4,3,1,4,3,1,4 Simms posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Broads Water Quality Report: River Thurne 2015
    East Anglia Area (Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk) Broads water quality report: River Thurne 2015 Map showing the location of water quality sampling sites in the River Thurne and Broads. Broads water quality report: River Thurne 2015 Page 1 of 6 Status River: Water quality is good for dissolved oxygen, ammonia and nitrate. Broads: Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen – including ammonia and nitrate) are not all meeting the national and international standards High nutrient concentrations have a negative effect on the ecology of the broads. Nutrient sources include internal release from sediments, diffuse sources and tidal mixing of water from downstream. It is estimated that 97% of phosphorus in the Upper Thurne Broads and marshes comes from diffuse sources such as agriculture, minor point sources and septic tanks. Ammonia levels fail the water quality standards in Horsey Mere where concentrations are noticeably higher than the other broads in the Thurne. This is because there is an input of ammonia to the broad from the surface drains via Brograve drainage pump. The water in the Thurne river and broads is brackish. This is caused by sea water percolating through the ground close to the coast which is then drawn through drainage pumps into the broads and rivers. Actions The water catchment around the Thurne is designated as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone. In this zone limits are set on when and how much nitrogen can be applied to agricultural land to reduce the amount of nitrate reaching the rivers and broads. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nutrient-management-nitrate-vulnerable-zones Following studies done in 2014, the dominant source of ammonia in the Brograve drain is believed to be from agricultural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    : ; TRANSACTIONS OF THE IlutTnlk anti BntTtfick SOCIETY Presented to the Members for - 1882 83 . A OL. III. —Part iv. Itorbidi PRINTED BY FLETCHER AND SON. 1383 . OFFICERS FOR 1882-83. resilient. MR. H. D. GELDART. fEr^rrstornt. MR. J. II. GURNEY, Jun., F.Z.S. Ficc^Jrrsiticnts. THE RIGHT IION. THE EARL OF LEICESTER, K.G. 'FHE RIGHT IION. THE EARL OF KIMBERLEY LORD WALSINGHAM IIENRY STEVENSON, F.L.S. SIR F. G. M. BOILEAU, Bart. MICHAEL BEVERLEY, M.D. SIR WILLOUGHBY JONES, Bart. HERBERT D. GELDART SIR HENRY STRACEY, Bart. JOHN B. BRIDGMAN, F.L.S. W. A. TYSSEN AMHERST, M.P. T. G. BAYFIELD Treasurer. MR. II. D. GELD ART. li>nn. jSrcrrtaru. MR. W. H. BIDWELL. Committer. MR. T. R. PINDER DR. S. T. TAYLOR MR. F. SUTTON MR. C. CLOWES W. MR. S. CORDER MR. 0. CORDER MR. J. ORFEUR MR. A. W. PRESTON MR. T. SOUTHWELL Journal Committee. PROFESSOR NEWTON MR. M. P. SQUIRRELL MR. JAMES REEVE MR, T. SOUTHWELL MR. B. E. FLETCHER 3itbifor. MR. S. W. UTTING. LIST OF MEMBERS, 1882—83. A Brown Rev. J. L., M.A. Brown William, Ilaynford Hall Amherst W. A. T., M.P., F.Z.S., Y.P., Brownfield J. Didlington Hall Bulwer W. D. E., Quebec House, East Amyot T. E., F.R.C.S., Diss Dereham Asker G. H., Ingworth Burcham R. P. Burlingham D. Catlin, Lynn B Burton S. IL, M.B. Butcher H. F. Babington Rev. Churchill, D.D., Buxton C. Louis, Bolwick Hall Cockfield Rectory Buxton Geoffrey F., Thorpe Bailey Rev. J., M.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK. • Witton & Worstead
    518 NORTH W ALSHAM, NORFOLK. • Witton & Worstead. Rapping division-Brunstead, Medical Officer & Public Vaccinator, North Walsham Catfield, East Ruston, Happisburgh, Hempstead-cum­ District, Smallburgh Union, Sidney Hope Harrison Eccles, Hiclding, Horsey, Ingham, Lessingham, Lud­ M.R.C.S.Eng., L.R.C.P.Lond. Aylsham road ham, Palling, Potter Heigham, Stalham, Sutton, Wal­ Medical Officer & Public Vaccinator, Southrepps District, cott & W a:xham Erpingham Union, John Shepheard B.A.,M.R.C.S.Eng., L.R.C.P.Lond. Cromer road 1 NORTH WALSHAM SUB-COMMITTEE OF NORFOLK Registrar of Marriages & Deputy for Births & Deaths LOCAL PENSION COMMITTEE. for the Smallburgh District, Ernest W. Gregory, ' The following places are included in the Sub-District:­ Excelsior house, -King's Arms street Alby, Aldborough, Antingham, Bacton, Banningham, Relieving & Vaccination Officer, Tunstead District & ,Barton Turf, Beeston St. Lawrence, Bradfield, Brum­ Registrar of Births & Deaths, North Walsham District;, stead, Burgh, Calthorpe, Catfield, Colby, Crostwight, "Smallburgh Union, George Boult Hewitt, Yarmouth rd Dilham, Ea~t Ruston, Edingthorpe, Erpingham, Fel­ Superintendent Registrar of Smallburgh Union, Fairfax mingham, Gimingham, Gunton, Happisburgh, Hemp­ Davies. Grammar School road stead-cum-Eccles, Hickling, Honing, Ingham, Ingworth, PLACES OF WORSHIP, with times of Services. Irstead, Knapton, Lessingham, Mundesley, Neatishead, _N orthrepps, North Walsham, Overstrand, Oxnead, St. Nicholas Church, Rev. Robert Aubrey Aitken M.A. Paston, Ridlington, Sidestrand, Skeyton, Sea Palling, vicar & rural dean; Rev. Tom Harry Cromwell Nash Smallburgh, Southrepps, Suffield, Sutton, Swafield, Th.A.K.C. curate; 8 & II a.m. & 3 & 6.30 p.m. ; Stalham, Swanton Abbott, Thorpe Market, Thwaite, mon. wed. & fri. li a.m. ; tues. thurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Martham Boats Vehicles
    services About us DAY BOAT HIRE BEDDING All of our boats come with clean and laundered bedding ready to make regattas your stay as comfortable as possible. MARTHAM GARAGE ARRANGEMENTS At owner’s risk, cars may be garaged under cover at our works or parked outdoors for the period of your holiday. A charge is made for this. We strongly recommend customers to take advantage of the Why not hire one of our sailing boats undercover parking facility. BOATS TRANSPORT On arrival at either the train or coach station, telephone 01493 CLASSIC MOTOR & SAILING HOLIDAYS ON for the following events: 740249 and we shall be pleased to collect your party with one of the company Founded in 1946 and set in the very heart of the Norfolk Broads, Martham Boats vehicles. This extends to the return of your party on the day of departure. A is a traditional boat yard that hires traditional wooden cruisers, sailing yachts, THE NORFOLK BROADS small charge is made to cover the cost of fuel. half-deckers, bungalows, motor cruisers, canoes and day launches on the River Thurne. Horsey Mere REGATTA LUGGAGE Luggage forwarded in advance is accepted and stored until your motor • paddle • SAIL In 2013 Horsey Mere Regatta returned for the first time in over a century , arrival. Empty cases may be stored at the boatyard whilst you are on your cruise. Set in idyllic Norfolk Broads countryside,we offer a wide range of self catering attracting half deckers, production cruisers, hire yachts and dingies who take accommodation from cosy riverside bungalows to the hire of traditional hand part in several races over the weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of Parish
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Aldborough and Thurgarton Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* BAILLIE The Bays, Chapel Murat Anne M Tony Road, Thurgarton, Norwich, NR11 7NP ELLIOTT Sunholme, The Elliott Ruth Paul Martin Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA GALLANT Spring Cottage, The Elliott Paul M David Peter Green, Aldborough, NR11 7AA WHEELER 4 Pipits Meadow, Grieves John B Jean Elizabeth Aldborough, NR11 7NW WORDINGHAM Two Oaks, Freeman James H J Peter Thurgarton Road, Aldborough, NR11 7NY *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Dated: Friday 10 April 2015 Sheila Oxtoby Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9EN STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED North Norfolk Election of Parish Councillors The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Councillor for Antingham Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* EVERSON Margra, Southrepps Long Trevor F Graham Fredrick Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP JONES The Old Coach Independent Bacon Robert H Graham House, Antingham Hall, Cromer Road, Antingham, N. Walsham, NR28 0NJ LONG The Old Forge, Everson Graham F Trevor Francis Elderton Lane, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NR LOVE Holly Cottage, McLeod Lynn W Steven Paul Antingham Hill, North Walsham, Norfolk, NR28 0NH PARAMOR Field View, Long Trevor F Stuart John Southrepps Road, Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated.
    [Show full text]