The Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 1 THE INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS OF CANADA PART 1 Collecting, Preparing and Preserving Insec Mites, and pide Agriculture Canada THE INSECTS AND ARACHNIDS OF CANADA PART 1 Collecting, Preparing, and Preserving Insects, Mites, and Spiders Compiled by J. E. H. Martin Biosystcmatics Research Institute Ottawa, Ontario Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture Publication 1643 1977 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1978 Available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada Hull, Quebec, Canada KIA OS9 or through your bookseller. Catalogue No. A42-421l977-1 Canada: $3.50 ISBN 0-660-01650-8 Other countries: $4.20 Price subject to change without notice. Printed by Kromar Printing Ltd. 02KT.OIA05-7-38911 The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 2. The Bark Beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), by Donald E. Bright, Jr., Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, was published in 1976. Part 3. The Aradidae of Canada (Hemiptera: Aradidae), by Ryuichi Matsuda, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, was published in 1977. Part 4. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), by Leonard A. Kelton, Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, is in press. Contents Foreword 9 Introduction 11 Equipment and methods for collecting 11 General-purpose nets 11 Nets for flying insects 14 Lights and light traps 15 Baits and bait traps 20 Other traps for flying insects 23 Malaise traps 23 Window traps 28 Tent-window traps 28 Visual-attraction traps 30 Pan traps 30 Baits 31 Sweeping 33 Beating 34 Emergence cages and separators 40 Searching 42 Barking 42 Mammal nests 43 Aspirator 43 Collecting leafmining insects 46 Collecting and extracting arthropods from debris 47 Berlese funnel 47 Sifter and photoeclector 54 Collecting and extracting burrowing and boring arthropods 56 Collecting aquatic insects and mites 57 Aquatic traps 63 Lentic environment traps ,.......................................................... 63 Surface emergence traps 64 Tow traps 65 Benthonic samplers 65 Lotic environments 66 Collecting ectoparasites of vertebrates 67 Collecting mites associated with invertebrates 69 Rearing 70 Killing agents and killing bottles 73 Equipment and methods for preserving and mounting 79 Relaxing 79 Cleaning 81 Temporary storage in papers 82 Temporary storage by refrigeration 84 Temporary storage by layering 85 Direct pinning 85 Double mounting 90 Spreading .. 90 Adhesives and pointing 94 Preservation in liquids 98 Dry preservation of soft-bodied insects 101 Microscopical preparations 102 Insects 102 5 Mites 107 Data labels 109 Storage and care of collections 113 Storage and care of pinned insects 113 Storage of a collection preserved in liquid 116 Storage of microscope slides 116 Packing insects and arachnids for shipment 118 Studying the collection 122 Applying the methods 124 Thysanura 124 Diplura 125 Collembola and Protura 125 Orthoptera and Dermaptera 125 Plecoptera 128 Isoptera 128 Corrodentia 128 Mallophaga 128 Anoplura 129 Ephemeroptera 130 Odonata 131 Thysanoptera 132 Hemiptera (including Heteroptera and Homoptera) 133 Preserving and mounting Hemiptera 134 Preserving and mounting Aphidoidea, Coccoidea, and Aleyrodoidea : 135 Megaloptera 136 Neuroptera 137 Mecoptera 137 Trichoptera 137 Lepidoptera 138 Coleoptera 142 Strepsiptera 145 Hymenoptera 146 Symphyta 146 Ichneumonoidea 147 Microhymenoptera 148 Apoidea, Sphecoidea, Vespoidea, Scolioidea 151 Formicidae 151 Diptera 152 Collecting adults 152 Assembly sites 153 Artificial light 153 Sunlight 153 Traps 153 Chemicals 154 Unbaited traps 154 Pan traps 155 Preserving and mounting 155 Pinning 155 Freeze-drying 156 Double mounts 156 Pinning from alcohol 156 Dissected genitalia 157 Microscopic mounts 157 Collecting and rearing immature stages 157 6 Aquatic larvae 158 Leafminers 158 Soil-dwelling larvae 158 Larvae in decaying vegetation 159 Carrion and dung feeders : 0 159 Parasites 159 Aphid predators 159 Larval and pupal exuviae 159 Siphonaptera 161 Acari (mites) 162 Ixodides 167 Araneae 167 Formulas 169 References 172 Index 175 7 Foreword This publication replaces Collecting, Preparing and Preserving Insects. Canada Department of Agriculture Publication 932, compiled by Bryan P. Beirne and published in ]955. This text was prepared by members of the zoology staff of the Biosystematics Research Institute, except for a contribu­ tion on the order Orthoptera by Dr. V. R. Vickery of Macdonald College, McGill University, Montreal, Que. This guide to collecting and preserving has a dual objective: to acquaint amateur entomologists or potential amateurs with the basic methods of obtaining insect and arthropod material and preparing a collection; and to serve as a guide to both amateur and professional entomologists on how to prepare material before submitting it to the National Identification Service of the Biosystematics Research Institute. Address your inquiries regarding the identification of insects to: Officer-in-Charge National Identification Service Biosystematics Research Institute Agriculture Canada Ottawa, Ontario KIA OC6 This publication is Part 1 of the Canadian faunaI series, The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. The series will treat various groups of arthropods occurring in Canada. Difficulty with the preparation of suitable illustrations delayed the publication of this volume, and therefore it has been preceded by Part 2 in the series, The Bark Beetles of Canada and Alaska, which was published in 1976. Several additional manuscripts have been completed and will soon be published as further parts of the Canadian faunal series. Contributions by the following people to the preparation of this book are acknowledged. John E. H. Martin assumed the task of compiling the various submissions and of preparing several of the chapters. Dr. E. E. Lindquist and G. E. Shewell made extensive contributions to the text. Susan Rigby and Bernard Baker prepared the illustrations. Drs. G. P. Holland, E. C. Becker, and W. R. Richards reviewed the manuscript in its early stages, and the Editorial Committee of the Canadian faunal series, Drs. D. E. Bright, C. D. Dondale, and D. R. Oliver, reviewed the final typescript. D. M. Archibald of the Research Program Service made a material contribution to this volume by her constructive editing of the manuscript. D. F. Hardwick Director Biosystematics Research Institute 9 Introduction In entomology the main reason for using various collecting methods and equipment is to obtain specimens of all kinds of insects, mites, and spiders in the easiest and most effective way. The chief aim of using various methods and equipment for preparing and preserving insects is to preserve the specimens in a natural, undamaged, and undistorted condition. The methods and equipment described in this publication have been found satis­ factory. However, because none accomplishes its objective completely, each one may be improved or adapted to new conditions. Moreover, new methods and equipment are continually being developed. To assist in improving and developing new techniques, the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of the best-known methods and equipment are described here. Equipment and methods for collecting Various methods of collecting may be used to collect insects from each of the 10 environmental situations in which insects occur. Insects are found in the air; in fresh or brackish water; on the foliage or stems of trees and shrubs; on low-growing plants; on the ground or near the roots of low­ growing plants; internally in plants, plant products, seeds, and fruit; among debris; in the nests or habitations of animals and man; in the soil; and on or in other insects or animals. Because certain collecting methods and situations or environments at times may produce insects in large numbers, they are preferred to the methods, situations, and times that are less productive quan­ titatively but that may produce species that otherwise are rarely captured. The latter methods must be used, however, in order to complete a survey of the insect fauna of a region, locality, habitat, or plant, or a collection of a particular insect group. Collecting may be merely a matter of picking up the insects with your fingers after you have watched their habits and discovered their habitats. However, obtaining specimens quickly and in large numbers often requires extensive field observations and special collecting equipment. Some kinds of equipment operate on the principle of extracting the insects manually or mechanically from the situations in which they occur; others concentrate or trap the insects by taking advantage of their normal movements or of their reactions to light, gravity, heat, moisture, and odors. General-purpose nets Nets are useful for catching flying and aquatic insects and for sweeping up insects from vegetation. If you intend to collect by only one of these methods, then use a net designed for that specific method. These specially designed nets are described under their appropriate headings: "Nets for Flying Insects" on p. 14, "Collecting Aquatic Insects and Mites" on p. 57, and II "Sweeping" on p. 33. The differences in design consist of modifications of some or all of the three main parts of the net: the ring, the bag, and the handle. General-purpose nets can be used for various kinds of collecting by merely changing the bag. Use a net with a ring that detaches from the handle so that the bag can be replaced easily when it wears out, gets wet, torn, dirty, or has to be changed for one of another material. A folding ring (Fig. 1) is easy to carry when you are traveling. A simple net (Fig. 2) has a 38 cm (15 in.) ring of about 3 mm (1/8 in.) iron or steel wire. The ends of the wire are straight and fit into grooves in the handle; their tips are bent inward to fit into holes in the handle. The ends may be held in place by binding them firmly with insulating or adhesive tape or by using a sliding metal sleeve. The use of a sliding metal sleeve makes the ring easier to remove from the handle. Perhaps the best net for general purposes is the kind that is used as a fisherman's landing net (Fig. 3), though you may find it heavy to carry.
Recommended publications
  • Examining Possible Foraging Differences in Urban and Rural Cave Cricket Populations: Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Ratios (Δ13c, Δ15n) As Indicators of Trophic Level
    Examining possible foraging differences in urban and rural cave cricket populations: Carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N) as indicators of trophic level Steven J. Taylor1, Jean K. Krejca2, and Keith C. Hackley3 1Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-649-0240 ) 2Zara Environmental, LLC, Buda, TX 78610 ( [email protected] phone: 512-295-5333 ) 3Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory, Illinois State Geological Survey, 615 E Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL 61820 ( [email protected] phone: 217-244-2396 ) 30 November 2007 Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2007 (59) prepared for: Attn: Dr. C. Craig Farquhar Section 6 Grant Program Coordinator, Wildlife Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 USA Cover: Cicurina varians (Araneae) in web in Surprise Sink, Bexar County, Texas. Note Pseudosinella violenta (Collembola) in lower left and fresh fecal pellets of Ceuthophilus sp. to left of center. Photo by Jean K. Krejca. Abstract The energy regime in small Texas caves differs significantly from many caves of the better studied eastern United States in that surface-foraging cave crickets (Ceuthophilus secretus and Ceuthophilus “species B”) are major contributors to these systems. The federally listed endangered cave invertebrates of Travis, Williamson, and Bexar counties, Texas, are dependent on these crickets to transport energy from the surface to the cave environment. Using stable isotope analysis in combination with in- cave counts of animal life we examined foraging differences between S. invicata and cave cricket populations in nine caves chosen based on their low, medium, and high levels of human impact.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES in LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 10, No 4, 2021, 105 – 115 2277-663X (P) SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES IN LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D. Rech1*, Brianda Alirez2 and Lauren Paulk2 1Western New Mexico University, Deming, New Mexico 2Early College High School, Deming, New Mexico E-mail: [email protected] (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: The Chihuahua Desert is the largest hot desert (BWh) in North America. Orthopterans are an integral part of desert ecosystems. They include grasshoppers, katydids and crickets. A large section of the Northern Chihuahua Desert is in Luna County, New Mexico. There is a dearth of information on the Orthopterans in this area. Between May and October of 2020, sixty adult grasshoppers, two katydids and one camel cricket were captured from a 5-hectare (ha) area at base of the Florida Mountains, which is the extreme southern portion of Luna County. Luna County was in a severe drought during 2020. The insects were identified using several taxonomic keys (Cigliano, Braun, Eades & Otte, 2018; Guala & Doring, 2019; Triplehorn & Johnson, 2005; Richman, Lightfoot, Sutherland & Fergurson, 1993, Otte, 1984, 1981; Tinkham, 1944). A previous New Mexico State University (NMSU) survey from 1993 had only documented grasshoppers in the Acrididae and Romaleidae families. The objective of this continuing study is to identify and document all species of Orthopterans found in Luna County, and correlate the populations with changing weather patterns. In this portion of the study, the majority of Orthopterans captured were Leprus wheeleri (Thomas), a previously documented specie. However, seven undocumented species were also captured.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Breathing: the Mechanics of Plastron Respiration
    J. Fluid Mech. (2008), vol. 608, pp. 275–296. c 2008 Cambridge University Press 275 doi:10.1017/S0022112008002048 Printed in the United Kingdom Underwater breathing: the mechanics of plastron respiration M. R. FLYNN† AND J O H N W. M. B U S H Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA (Received 11 July 2007 and in revised form 10 April 2008) The rough, hairy surfaces of many insects and spiders serve to render them water-repellent; consequently, when submerged, many are able to survive by virtue of a thin air layer trapped along their exteriors. The diffusion of dissolved oxygen from the ambient water may allow this layer to function as a respiratory bubble or ‘plastron’, and so enable certain species to remain underwater indefinitely. Main- tenance of the plastron requires that the curvature pressure balance the pressure difference between the plastron and ambient. Moreover, viable plastrons must be of sufficient area to accommodate the interfacial exchange of O2 and CO2 necessary to meet metabolic demands. By coupling the bubble mechanics, surface and gas-phase chemistry, we enumerate criteria for plastron viability and thereby deduce the range of environmental conditions and dive depths over which plastron breathers can survive. The influence of an external flow on plastron breathing is also examined. Dynamic pressure may become significant for respiration in fast-flowing, shallow and well-aerated streams. Moreover, flow effects are generally significant because they sharpen chemical gradients and so enhance mass transfer across the plastron interface. Modelling this process provides a rationale for the ventilation movements documented in the biology literature, whereby arthropods enhance plastron respiration by flapping their limbs or antennae.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae: Ceuthophilus Spp.) Jason D
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Comparative phylogeography of two ARTICLE codistributed subgenera of cave crickets (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae: Ceuthophilus spp.) Jason D. Weckstein1,2, Kevin P. Johnson1, John D. Murdoch1,3, Jean K. Krejca4, Daniela M. Takiya1,5, George Veni6, James R. Reddell7 and Steven J. Taylor1* 1Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie ABSTRACT Research Institute, University of Illinois at Aim We compare the phylogeographical structure among caves for co-occur- Urbana-Champaign, 1816 South Oak Street, 2 ring cave dwelling crickets (Ceuthophilus) in two subgenera Ceuthophilus Champaign, IL 61820, USA, Department of Ornithology, Academy of Natural Sciences, (Ceuthophilus) (hereafter, called Ceuthophilus) and Ceuthophilus (Geotettix) and Department of Biodiversity, Earth, and (hereafter, called Geotettix). In our study area (central Texas), cave-inhabiting Environmental Sciences, Drexel University, members of the subgenus Ceuthophilus are trogloxenes, roosting in the caves 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, but foraging above ground and occasionally moving between caves, whereas Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA, 3European members of the subgenus Geotettix are near-obligate cave dwellers, which for- Neuroscience Institute, Grisebachstraße 5, age inside the caves, and only rarely are found above ground. Differences in G€ottingen 37077, Germany, 4Zara potential dispersal ability and ecology provide a framework for understanding Environmental LLC, 1707 West FM 1626, their effects on the phylogeographical
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Flat Bug Genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Denisia Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 0019 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lariviere Marie C., Larochelle Andre Artikel/Article: An overview of flat bug genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae) from New Zealand, with considerations on faunal diversification and affinities 181-214 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at An overview of flat bug genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae) from New Zealand, with considerations on faunal diversification and affinities1 M .-C . L ARIVIÈRE & A. L AROCHELLE Abstract: Nineteen genera and thirty-nine species of Aradidae have been described from New Zealand, most of which are endemic (12 genera, 38 species). An overview of all genera and an identification key to subfamilies, tribes, and genera are presented for the first time. Species included in each genus are list- ed for New Zealand. Concise generic descriptions, illustrations emphasizing key diagnostic features, colour photographs representing each genus, an overview of the most relevant literature, and notes on distribution are also given. The biology and diversification of New Zealand aradids, and their affinities with neighbouring faunas are briefly discussed. Key words: Aradidae, biogeography, Hemiptera, New Zealand, taxonomy. Introduction forests, and using their stylets to extract liq- uids from fungal hyphae associated with de- The Aradidae, also commonly referred caying wood. Many ground-dwelling species to as flat bugs or bark bugs, form a large fam- of rainforest environments are wingless – a ily of Heteroptera containing over 1,800 condition thought to have evolved several species and 210 genera worldwide (SCHUH times in the phylogeographic history of the & SLATER 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V
    The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V. Bennett Edwin F. Cook Technical Bulletin 332-1981 Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ...................................3 Key to Adults of Nearctic Families of Semiaquatic Hemiptera ................... 6 Family Saldidae-Shore Bugs ............... 7 Family Mesoveliidae-Water Treaders .......18 Family Hebridae-Velvet Water Bugs .......20 Family Hydrometridae-Marsh Treaders, Water Measurers ...22 Family Veliidae-Small Water striders, Rime bugs ................24 Family Gerridae-Water striders, Pond skaters, Wherry men .....29 Family Ochteridae-Velvety Shore Bugs ....35 Family Gelastocoridae-Toad Bugs ..........36 Literature Cited ..............................37 Figures ......................................44 Maps .........................................55 Index to Scientific Names ....................59 Acknowledgement Sincere appreciation is expressed to the following individuals: R. T. Schuh, for being extremely helpful in reviewing the section on Saldidae, lending specimens, and allowing use of his illustrations of Saldidae; C. L. Smith for reading the section on Veliidae, checking identifications, and advising on problems in the taxon­ omy ofthe Veliidae; D. M. Calabrese, for reviewing the section on the Gerridae and making helpful sugges­ tions; J. T. Polhemus, for advising on taxonomic prob­ lems and checking identifications for several families; C. W. Schaefer, for providing advice and editorial com­ ment; Y. A. Popov, for sending a copy ofhis book on the Nepomorpha; and M. C. Parsons, for supplying its English translation. The University of Minnesota, including the Agricultural Experi­ ment Station, is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, or handicap. The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Classification Standards 2020
    RECOMMENDED INSECT CLASSIFICATION FOR UGA ENTOMOLOGY CLASSES (2020) In an effort to standardize the hexapod classification systems being taught to our students by our faculty in multiple courses across three UGA campuses, I recommend that the Entomology Department adopts the basic system presented in the following textbook: Triplehorn, C.A. and N.F. Johnson. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont CA, 864 pp. This book was chosen for a variety of reasons. It is widely used in the U.S. as the textbook for Insect Taxonomy classes, including our class at UGA. It focuses on North American taxa. The authors were cautious, presenting changes only after they have been widely accepted by the taxonomic community. Below is an annotated summary of the T&J (2005) classification. Some of the more familiar taxa above the ordinal level are given in caps. Some of the more important and familiar suborders and families are indented and listed beneath each order. Note that this is neither an exhaustive nor representative list of suborders and families. It was provided simply to clarify which taxa are impacted by some of more important classification changes. Please consult T&J (2005) for information about taxa that are not listed below. Unfortunately, T&J (2005) is now badly outdated with respect to some significant classification changes. Therefore, in the classification standard provided below, some well corroborated and broadly accepted updates have been made to their classification scheme. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests1
    DA United States US Department of Proceedings --z:;;-;;; Agriculture Forest Service Integrating Cultural Tactics into Northeastern Forest Experiment Station the Management of Bark Beetle General Technical Report NE-236 and Reforestation Pests Edited by: Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team J.C. Gregoire A.M. Liebhold F.M. Stephen K.R. Day S.M.Salom Vallombrosa, Italy September 1-3, 1996 Most of the papers in this publication were submitted electronically and were edited to achieve a uniform format and type face. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. Some participants did not submit papers so they have not been included. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Remarks about pesticides appear in some technical papers contained in these proceedings. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by State and Federal Law. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife - if they are not handled and applied properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Flat Bug Family Aradidae from Baltic Amber IX
    Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 61 (1) 2014, 27–29 | DOI 10.3897/dez.61.7155 museum für naturkunde Revision of the flat bug family Aradidae from Baltic Amber IX. Aradus macrosomus sp. n. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Ernst Heiss1 1 Tiroler Landesmuseum, Josef Schraffl Strasse 2a, A 6020 Innsbruck, Austria † http://zoobank.org/A4B5783D-568C-4928-86CB-3315714AC586 http://zoobank.org/F349411B-C7AA-4802-96A2-6E2836D20B1A Corresponding author: Ernst Heiss ([email protected]) Abstract Received 28 January 2014 The present paper is a continuation of previous contributions describing fossil Aradus spe- Accepted 24 April 2014 cies from Baltic Amber inclusions (Heiss 1998, 2002, 2013). Aradus macrosomus sp. n. Published 30 May 2014 is a well- preserved large new species which is described and illustrated herein. It differs by a combination of characters from the known Eocene and extant Aradus taxa, docu- Academic editor: menting again the unexpected richness of species diversity preserved in Baltic Amber. Sonja Wedmann Key Words Hemiptera Heteroptera Aradidae Aradus new species Baltic Amber 2000, 2002a), Mezirinae (1 sp.: Usinger 1941) and Aradi- Introduction nae (only genus Aradus). To date 14 species of the genus Aradus have been de- Baltic Amber, a fossilized tree resin found on or near the scribed from Baltic amber inclusions, sharing all essen- shores of the eastern Baltic Sea, represents the largest depos- tial characters (e.g., habitus, structure of body, hemelytra it of amber in the world. It is exceptionally rich in well-pre- and antennae) of this widely distributed extant genus (A. served inclusions of botanical and zoological objects, par- assimilis; A. superstes; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Homonymy in the Aradidae (Hemiptera)
    328 Pacific Insects Vol. 22, no. 3-4 1916. Rhynchota, Homoptera: Appendix. Fauna Br. India 6: 1-248. 1917. Rhynchota. Part 2: Suborder Homoptera. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905 under the leadership of Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner, M.A. Trans. Linn. Soc. Zool. 17: 273- 322. Fennah, R. G. 1950. Fulgoroidea of Fiji. Bishop Mus. Bull. 202: 1-122. 1956. Homoptera: Fulgoroidea. Insects Micronesia 6(3): 39-211. 1978. Fulgoroidea (Homoptera) from Viet-nam. Ann. Zool. 34(9): 208-79. Kirkaldy, G. W. 1907a. Leafhoppers supplement (Hemiptera). Bull. Hawaii. Sugar Plant. Assoc. Entomol. 3: 1-186. 1907b. Descriptions et remarques sur quelques Homopteres de Ia famille des Fulgoroideae vivant sur Ia canne a sucre. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 51: 123-27. Muir, F. 1925. On the genera of Cixiidae, Meenoplidae and Kinnaridae (Fulgoroidea, Homoptera). Pan- Pac. Entomol. 1: 156-63. Stal, C. 1859. Novae quaedam Fulgorinorum formae speciesque insigniores. Berl. Entomol. Z. 3: 313-27. Walker, F. 1857. Catalogue of the Homopterous insects collected at Sarawak, Borneo, by Mr. A. R. Wallace, with descriptions of new species. J. Proc. Linn. Soc. Zool. 1: 141-75. 1870. Catalogue of the Homopterous insects collected in the Indian archipelago by Mr. A. R. Wallace, with descriptions of new species./. Linn. Soc. Zool. 10: 82-193. Pacific Insects Vol. 22, no. 3-4: 328 17 December 1980 © 1980 by the Bishop Museum HOMONYMY IN THE ARADIDAE (HEMIPTERA) I am grateful to Professor Richard Cowen, University of California, Davis, for drawing my attention to the fact that the following names are preoccupied and require replacement names.
    [Show full text]
  • Cull of the Wild a Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States
    Cull of the Wild A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States Animal Protection Institute Sacramento, California Edited by Camilla H. Fox and Christopher M. Papouchis, MS With special thanks for their contributions to Barbara Lawrie, Dena Jones, MS, Karen Hirsch, Gil Lamont, Nicole Paquette, Esq., Jim Bringle, Monica Engebretson, Debbie Giles, Jean C. Hofve, DVM, Elizabeth Colleran, DVM, and Martin Ring. Funded in part by Edith J. Goode Residuary Trust The William H. & Mattie Wattis Harris Foundation The Norcross Wildlife Foundation Founded in 1968, the Animal Protection Institute is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for the protection of animals from cruelty and exploitation. Copyright © 2004 Animal Protection Institute Cover and interior design © TLC Graphics, www.TLCGraphics.com Indexing Services: Carolyn Acheson Cover photo: © Jeremy Woodhouse/Photodisc Green All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. For further information about the Animal Protection Institute and its programs, contact: Animal Protection Institute P.O. Box 22505 Sacramento, CA 95822 Phone: (916) 447-3085 Fax: (916) 447-3070 Email: [email protected] Web: www.api4animals.org Printed by Bang Publishing, Brainerd, Minnesota, USA ISBN 0-9709322-0-0 Library of Congress ©2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Introduction . ix CHAPTERS 1. Trapping in North America: A Historical Overview . 1 2. Refuting the Myths . 23 3. Trapping Devices, Methods, and Research . 31 Primary Types of Traps Used by Fur Trappers in the United States .
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Role of Cave Crickets (Rhaphidophoridae) in Central Texas Cave Ecosystems: Isotope Ratios (Δ13c, Δ15n) and Radio Tracking
    Final Report Examining the Role of Cave Crickets (Rhaphidophoridae) in Central Texas Cave Ecosystems: Isotope Ratios (δ13C, δ15N) and Radio Tracking Steven J. Taylor1, Keith Hackley2, Jean K. Krejca3, Michael J. Dreslik 1, Sallie E. Greenberg2, and Erin L. Raboin1 1Center for Biodiversity Illinois Natural History Survey 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217) 333-5702 [email protected] 2 Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory Illinois State Geological Survey 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 3Zara Environmental LLC 118 West Goforth Road Buda, Texas 78610 Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 2004 (9) Prepared for: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center ERDC-CTC, ATTN: Michael L. Denight 2902 Newmark Drive Champaign, IL 61822-1076 27 September 2004 Cover: A cave cricket (Ceuthophilus The Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis secretus) shedding its exuvium on a shrub (False Indigo, Amorpha fruticosa L.) outside invicta Buren, RIFA) has been shown to enter and of Big Red Cave. Photo by Jean K. Krejca. forage in caves in central Texas (Elliott 1992, 1994; Reddell 2001; Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001b). Many of these caves are home to federally endangered invertebrates (USFWS 1988, 1993, 2000) or closely related, often rare taxa (Reddell 2001, Reddell and Cokendolpher 2001a). The majority of these caves are small – at Fort Hood (Bell and Coryell counties), the mean length1 of the caves is 51.7 m (range 2.1 - 2571.6 m, n=105 caves). Few of the caves harbor large numbers of bats, perhaps because low ceiling heights increase their vulnerability to depredation by other vertebrate predators (e.g., raccoons, Procyon lotor).
    [Show full text]