Borderless, Boundless

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Borderless, Boundless Borderless, boundless. 2011 Greater China outbound M&A spotlight Chinese Services Group Contents 1 Foreword 2 Executive summary 4 Methodology 5 Greater China outbound M&A activity 12 Consumer Business & Transportation M&A activity 18 Energy & Resources M&A activity 25 Global Financial Services Industry M&A activity 30 Life Science & Health Care M&A activity 34 Manufacturing M&A activity 40 Technology, Media & Telecommunications M&A activity 46 Private equity M&A activity 54 A view from the other side - a target's perspective of a cross-border M&A deal 57 The impact of the 12th Five Year Plan on outbound M&A opportunities 60 The regulatory roundup 64 Introducing the Chinese Services Group 65 Expanding around the globe… 66 Deloitte's CSG network 67 Contacts 68 Notes Foreword Barclays, IBM, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger and Volvo - all renowned, market-leading champions in their particular fields - and all owned, or partly owned, by a business headquartered in Greater China. As the list goes on, individual names become unimportant. What is of importance is the irrefutable fact that cross-border acquisitions emanating from Greater China have grown of late, not only in stature, as the above can attest to, but also in scope and breadth. The stature of deal-making in this particular market has certainly increased over time. In 2005, less than one-out-of-five (19 percent) transactions were valued at more than US$250m. Over the first six months of 2011, this proportion rose to 27 percent, with the market's growing maturity also evident from a global standpoint. Over the same timeframes, outbound M&A activity went from accounting for roughly 0.5 percent of global M&A activity to comprising approximately 1.3 percent. And as Greater China outbound M&A deals have progressively become the norm - as opposed to the exception - so too have their breadth. Over 2005, more than half (52 percent) of total overseas investments by volume went to just five countries - a proportion which fell to 49 percent in the first half of 2011. In fact, over the first six months of the year, Greater China buyers snapped up assets in countries as diverse as Cambodia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and the Ukraine - in fact, in every single geographical region across the globe apart from Central America and South Asia. As Greater China businesses broaden and deepen their reach overseas, so too do the underlying factors governing their desire to buy abroad. The years of 2008 and 2009, when Energy & Resources firms from Greater China accounted for more than three-quarters of overseas transactions by value, are now a distant memory, as a potent tonic of economic development, as well as the guiding hand of the state, increasingly steers investment flows into other, more value-added industries. Interest in foreign Consumer Business & Transportation assets is one such area which is seeing growth. Over the first half of 2011, overseas purchases more than doubled year-over-year from a volume perspective, and rose by a factor of five, when looking at valuations. Indeed, razor-thin profit margins within immensely competitive markets at home have forced Chinese consumer product manufacturers to seek new customers abroad, and in some instances, the move overseas has also (inadvertently or otherwise) conferred them with an ability to remarket technologically-superior and/or higher-quality products at home. The same can also be said about the Technology, Media & Telecommunications industry, which has witnessed an explosion of outbound M&A of late, perhaps driven by Greater China businesses' collective need to stay one step ahead of their rivals and at the forefront of the technological curve. However, deal-making in this particular industry is continually dogged by foreign scrutiny, with regulators in developed, economies occasionally taking a negative view of the ultimate motives of some of these acquirers. In order to illuminate these market developments, as well as others, Deloitte's Global Chinese Services Group has produced Borderless, boundless: 2011 Greater China outbound M&A spotlight, which brings you a historical review of outbound M&A activity over recent years, as well as proprietary insights from Deloitte rainmakers into what is driving this change and where the market is headed over the next 18 months. We hope you enjoy reading it and welcome your feedback. Lawrence Chia Head of Deloitte China M&A Services & Global Chinese Services Group Co-Chairman Borderless, boundless 2011 Greater China outbound M&A spotlight 1 Executive summary Outbound M&A overview Sector focus • Greater China outbound M&A is increasingly • Energy & Resources deals contribute one becoming an important component of quarter of overall deal flows. Over H1 regional deal-making. As noted in the 2011, 25 percent of all acquisitions where foreword, outbound purchases in terms of in the Energy & Resources space, which also both volumes and valuations went from comprised 32 percent of the total amount comprising 0.5 percent of global M&A activity invested overseas. However, from both a in 2005 to 1.3 percent in H1 2011. In addition, deal volume and value perspective, these foreign acquisitions are also accounting for a percentages represent a drop in activity larger share of overall M&A flows in Greater compared with 2010 and 2009 metrics. China - over 2005, they comprised just more • Consumer Business & Transportation and than one-in-ten (11 percent) of domestic and Technology, Media & Telecommunications inbound M&A transactions by volume, as well as (TMT) transactions also account for making up 21 percent of total deal valuations. a significant proportion of activity. In By H1 2011, these percentages had risen to 21 combination, these industries make up a further percent and 27 percent respectively. 29 percent of all deals by volume, yet account • H2 2010 saw a record-breaking number for only 8 percent of total deal value. However, of outbound acquisitions take place. while TMT trends have remained broadly flat Outbound M&A activity hit a record-breaking 51 over the 2005 - H1 2011 period, Consumer transactions, valued at a cumulative US$30bn, Business & Transportation activity increased in Q4 2010, ending the busiest year for overseas from an 11 percent share of the overall number acquisitions since records began. Over 2010 of deals in 2009, to 17 percent in H1 2011. as a whole, 150 purchases, valued at a total of US$62bn, were undertaken, a 21 percent rise in year-over-year figures in terms of volumes, and Private equity deal-making a 157 percent increase in terms of values. • Outbound private equity activity softened • While H1 2011 deal flow was decidedly over H1 2011 after a strong performance softer in comparison. Nonetheless, the last in 2010. Outbound acquisitions of foreign quarter of 2010 signaled a market high, with targets by local private equity investors slowed quarterly metrics broadly declining from that over the first half of 2011, presumably due to peak over the subsequent two quarters. Overall the uncertain macroeconomic climate as well however, the market still saw two more deals as the fact that many GPs were busy raising being announced in H1 2011 than in the same RMB-denominated funds. Only five acquisitions, period a year before, with 75 acquisitions, valued at a total of US$546m, were closed in worth total of US$17bn. H1 2011, compared with nine deals valued at US$1.7bn in the same period the previous year. • Deal sizes continue to range higher than normal. In 2010, nearly 30 percent of all • Local GPs prefer to acquire Manufacturing transactions exceeded US$250m in value, sector assets. Unsurprisingly, it was acquisitions the highest proportion in this range since of Manufacturing sector assets that drove the 2005. Figures in H1 2011 were only slightly bulk of private equity M&A abroad, with such less robust, with more than one-quarter (27 deals amounting to one-quarter of all private percent) reaching these levels of value. These equity purchases between 2005 and H1 2011. figures show acquisitions strengthening over the preceding years, as just under one-quarter (24 percent) of all transactions over the whole Outbound M&A activity hit six-and-a-half year (2009 - H1 2011) period were valued at more than US$250m. a record-breaking 51 transactions, valued at a cumulative US$30bn, in Q4 2010, ending the busiest year for overseas acquisitions since records began 2 Deal rationales Obstacles While each and every deal is the product of While outbound M&A activity is moving from particular factors, some hidden from view, here strength to strength, there are still issues that are four overarching drivers of outbound M&A prospective bidders have to face. Here are the activity in general. three main factors: • Securing raw inputs. The single-largest factor • Regulatory processes. Greater China driving overseas acquisitions continues to be acquisitions abroad have often encountered a robust economy and as a result, continuing the scrutiny of foreign regulators, a pattern strong domestic demand for commodities. repeated over H2 2010 and H1 2011, with Furthermore, demand for the energy inputs Huawei, the Chinese TMT player, having felt the required to convert these commodities into full arm of the US regulators of late. In addition, end products will also rise, compelling regional regulatory opacity could be further muddied by state-backed Energy & Resources players to hunt the deteriorating macroeconomic climate, which for increasingly scarce mineral inputs scattered tends to raise protectionist sentiment in target across the globe countries. • Lending a helping hand. As the recent tie-up • Macroeconomic volatility. Recent fluctuations between ICBC and Standard Bank Argentina can in global financial markets will undoubtedly attest to, a number of outbound acquisitions affect prospective bidders' perceptions of have actually been repositioning plays.
Recommended publications
  • Clean Energy Investing: Global Comparison of Investment Returns
    Clean Energy Investing: Global Comparison of Investment Returns March 2021 A Joint Report by the International Energy Agency and the Centre for Climate Finance & Investment Table of Contents 03 Executive Summary 05 Introduction 08 Analytical Methods 11 Key Investment Characteristics 14 Results 14 Global Markets 18 Advanced Economies 19 Emerging Market and Developing Economies 20 China 21 Transition Companies 22 The Covid Market Shock 24 Irrational Exuberance? 26 Conclusions 29 Acknowledgments 30 Annex A – Definition of Key Terms 32 Annex B – IEA Scenarios 33 Annex C – Fama-French Five-Factor Model 34 Annex D – Fossil Fuel Portfolio 48 Annex E – Renewable Power Portfolio 2 Executive Summary To shed light on the long-term prospects for clean energy, we investigate the historical financial performance of energy companies around the world in search of broad structural trends. This is the second in a series of joint reports by the International Energy Agency and Imperial College Business School examining the risk and return proposition in energy transitions. In this paper, we extend our coverage of publicly-traded renewable power and fossil fuel companies to the following: 1) global markets, 2) advanced economies, 3) emerging market and developing economies, and 4) China. We calculate the total return and annualized volatility of these portfolios over 5 and 10-year periods. Table 1 shows the 5 and 10-year results, up to December 31, 2020. Table 1 – Summary of Key Findings Global Markets Portfolios Advanced Economies Portfolios Fossil Fuel Renewable
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Publications
    2 FTSE Russell Publications FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex 19 August 2021 Japan ex Controversies ex CW Index Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) a2 Milk 0.1 NEW CJ Cheiljedang 0.1 KOREA GPT Group 0.22 AUSTRALIA ZEALAND CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.01 KOREA Green Cross 0.05 KOREA AAC Technologies Holdings 0.16 HONG KONG CJ Corp 0.04 KOREA GS Engineering & Construction 0.07 KOREA ADBRI 0.04 AUSTRALIA CJ ENM 0.05 KOREA GS Holdings 0.06 KOREA Afterpay Touch Group 0.61 AUSTRALIA CJ Logistics 0.04 KOREA GS Retail 0.04 KOREA AGL Energy 0.12 AUSTRALIA CK Asset Holdings 0.5 HONG KONG Guotai Junan International Holdings 0.01 HONG KONG AIA Group Ltd. 4.6 HONG KONG CK Hutchison Holdings 0.64 HONG KONG Haitong International Securities Group 0.02 HONG KONG Air New Zealand 0.02 NEW CK Infrastructure Holdings 0.11 HONG KONG Hana Financial Group 0.36 KOREA ZEALAND Cleanaway Waste Management 0.08 AUSTRALIA Hang Lung Group 0.07 HONG KONG ALS 0.14 AUSTRALIA CLP Holdings 0.5 HONG KONG Hang Lung Properties 0.15 HONG KONG Alteogen 0.06 KOREA Cochlear 0.37 AUSTRALIA Hang Seng Bank 0.44 HONG KONG Altium 0.09 AUSTRALIA Coles Group 0.5 AUSTRALIA Hanjin KAL 0.04 KOREA Alumina 0.1 AUSTRALIA ComfortDelGro 0.08 SINGAPORE Hankook Technology Group 0.1 KOREA Amcor CDI 0.54 AUSTRALIA Commonwealth Bank of Australia 4.07 AUSTRALIA Hanmi Pharmaceutical 0.06 KOREA AmoreG 0.05 KOREA Computershare 0.21 AUSTRALIA Hanmi Science 0.03 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.21 KOREA Contact Energy 0.14 NEW Hanon Systems 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Oil Field Is Window Into China's Corruption Crackdown
    CHINA An $85 million deal involving three blocks in southern Sumatra and a Chinese oil giant is under investigation. Depleted oil field is window into China’s corruption crackdown BY CHARLIE ZHU, DAVID LAGUE AND FERGUS JENSEN SPECIAL REPORT 1 CHINA CORRUPTION CRACKDOWN LIMAU, INDONESIA, DECEMBER 19, 2014 n a muddy clearing in southern Sumatra, a portable diesel power plant hammers Iaway alongside a wellhead, struggling to extract crude from a depleted reservoir that lies below farmland and rubber plantations. It was much easier to extract cash from a state-owned Chinese oil giant. A subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), PetroChina Daqing Oilfield, paid $85 million to pump from three blocks in the ageing Limau field un- der a 2013 contract with Indonesia’s state- owned oil company, Pertamina, according to senior Chinese oil industry officials with knowledge of the transaction. Today, the three Limau blocks squeeze PETRO PURGE: At least a dozen former top managers at China National Petroleum Corporation have out less than three percent of the oil been arrested as part of President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive. Zhou Yongkang (below), a former pumped when output peaked in the 1960s. CNPC boss and rival to Xi, faces charges of corruption and leaking state secrets. A wellhead atop the When PetroChina Daqing announced the depleted Limau field in Indonesia (cover). REUTERS/BOGDAN CRISTEL/JASON LEE/FERGUS JENSEN deal, it didn’t disclose the seller, the price or any other financial details. “We all know it is a ridiculous invest- ment, but I have no idea where the mon- ey has actually ended up,” says a senior billion Chinese oil industry official who has seen $25 The amount that CNPC spent on budget figures for the Limau wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater China Oil & Gas M&A and Greenfield FDI Investment Spotlight
    Greater China Oil & Gas M&A and greenfield FDI investment spotlight 2013 edition M&A Services 1 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Global Oil & Gas M&A and greenfield investment activity .................................................................................. 5 Greenfield Oil & Gas investment increasingly giving way to M&A activity across the globe ................................... 6 Where is this investment going? .............................................................................................................................. 6 The Greater China angle .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Foreign investments into China's Oil & Gas sector ................................................................................................. 9 Domestic investment activity in China's Oil & Gas sector ..................................................................................... 11 Greater China's Oil & Gas investments overseas ................................................................................................. 13 Looking forward – Potential deal opportunities and investment themes .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Infrastructure, Energy and Natural Resources (IEN)
    Asia Infrastructure, Energy and Natural Resources (IEN) Slaughter and May is a leading international firm with a worldwide corporate, commercial and financing practice. We provide clients with a professional service of the highest quality combining technical excellence and commercial awareness and a practical, constructive approach to legal services. We advise on the full range of matters for infrastructure, energy and natural resources clients in Asia, including projects, mergers and acquisitions, all forms of financing, competition and regulatory, tax, commercial, trading, construction, operation and maintenance contracts as well as general commercial and corporate advice. Our practice is divided into three key practice areas: – Infrastructure – rail and road; ports and airports; logistics; water and waste management. – Energy – power and renewables; oil and gas. – Mining and Minerals – coal, metals and minerals. For each regional project we draw on long‑standing relationships with leading independent law firms in Asia. This brings together individuals from the relevant countries to provide the optimum legal expertise for that particular transaction. This allows us to deliver a first class pan‑Asian and global seamless legal service of the highest quality. Recommended by clients for project agreements and ‘interfacing with government bodies’, Slaughter and May’s team is best-known for its longstanding advice to MTR on some of Hong Kong’s key infrastructure mandates. Projects and Energy – Legal 500 Asia Pacific Infrastructure – rail MTR Corporation Limited – we have advised the • Tseung Kwan O Line: The 11.9‑kilometre MTR Corporation Limited (MTR), a long‑standing Tseung Kwan O Line has 8 stations and links client of the firm and one of the Hong Kong office’s the eastern part of Hong Kong Island with the first clients, on many of its infrastructure and eastern part of Kowloon other projects, some of which are considered to be amongst the most significant projects to be • Disney Resort Line: The 3.3‑kilometre Disney undertaken in Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • STOXX Hong Kong All Shares 180 Last Updated: 03.04.2018
    STOXX Hong Kong All Shares 180 Last Updated: 03.04.2018 Rank Rank (PREVIOU ISIN Sedol RIC Int.Key Company Name Country Currency Component FF Mcap (BEUR) (FINAL) S) HK0000069689 B4TX8S1 1299.HK HK1013 AIA GROUP HK HKD Y 83.1 1 1 CNE1000002H1 B0LMTQ3 0939.HK CN0010 CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H CN HKD Y 71.5 2 2 CNE1000003G1 B1G1QD8 1398.HK CN0021 ICBC H CN HKD Y 49.4 3 3 CNE1000003X6 B01FLR7 2318.HK CN0076 PING AN INSUR GP CO. OF CN 'H' CN HKD Y 42.9 4 4 HK0941009539 6073556 0941.HK 607355 China Mobile Ltd. CN HKD Y 41.6 5 5 CNE1000001Z5 B154564 3988.HK CN0032 BANK OF CHINA 'H' CN HKD Y 33.3 6 7 HK0388045442 6267359 0388.HK 626735 Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing HK HKD Y 31.0 7 6 KYG217651051 BW9P816 0001.HK 619027 CK HUTCHISON HOLDINGS HK HKD Y 27.1 8 8 HK0016000132 6859927 0016.HK 685992 Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. HK HKD Y 20.2 9 10 HK0027032686 6465874 0027.HK 646587 GALAXY ENTERTAINMENT GP. HK HKD Y 20.1 10 11 HK0883013259 B00G0S5 0883.HK 617994 CNOOC Ltd. CN HKD Y 19.0 11 12 KYG2177B1014 BYZQ077 1113.HK HK50CI CK Asset Holdings Ltd HK HKD Y 18.8 12 9 HK0002007356 6097017 0002.HK 619091 CLP Holdings Ltd. HK HKD Y 18.3 13 13 CNE1000002Q2 6291819 0386.HK CN0098 China Petroleum & Chemical 'H' CN HKD Y 18.2 14 15 CNE1000002L3 6718976 2628.HK CN0043 China Life Insurance Co 'H' CN HKD Y 16.7 15 14 HK0823032773 B0PB4M7 0823.HK B0PB4M Link Real Estate Investment Tr HK HKD Y 15.1 16 16 HK2388011192 6536112 2388.HK 653611 BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • SPDR® FTSE® Greater China ETF a Sub-Fund of the SPDR® Etfs Stock Code: 3073 Website
    SPDR® FTSE® Greater China ETF A Sub-Fund of the SPDR® ETFs Stock Code: 3073 Website: www.spdrs.com.hk/etf/fund/fund_detail_3073_EN.html Interim Report 2021 1st October 2020 to 31st March 2021 SPDR® FTSE® Greater China ETF A Sub-Fund of the SPDR® ETFs Stock Code: 3073 Website: www.spdrs.com.hk/etf/fund/fund_detail_3073_EN.html Interim Report 2021 Contents Page Condensed Statement of Financial Position (Unaudited) 2 Condensed Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) 3 Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) 4 Condensed Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) 5 Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements 6 Investment Portfolio (Unaudited) 10 Statement of Movements in Portfolio Holdings (Unaudited) 41 Derivative Financial Instruments (Unaudited) 42 Performance Record (Unaudited) 42 Administration and Management 43 1 SPDR® FTSE® Greater China ETF a Sub-Fund of the SPDR® ETFs Interim Report 2021 CONDENSED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (UNAUDITED) As at 31st March 2021 31.03.2021 30.09.2020 Notes HK$ HK$ Assets Current assets Investments 1,385,908,557 969,438,426 Derivative financial instruments 54,331 47,229 Amounts due from brokers – 1,529,953 Dividends receivable 994,452 1,771,941 Other receivables 6(i) 122,017 347,255 Margin deposits 104,721 1,032,223 Cash at bank 6(f) 3,100,556 2,423,717 Total Assets 1,390,284,634 976,590,744 Liabilities Current liabilities Derivative financial instruments – 14 Amounts due to brokers – 1,500,560 Audit fee payable 154,612 309,225 Trustee fee payable 6(e) 382,474 270,773 Management fee payable 6(d) 684,377 481,283 Tax provision 156,265 214,282 Total Liabilities 1,377,728 2,776,137 Equity Net assets attributable to unitholders 4 1,388,906,906 973,814,607 The notes on pages 6 to 9 form part of these financial statements.
    [Show full text]
  • STOXX Hong Kong All Shares 180 Last Updated: 01.08.2017
    STOXX Hong Kong All Shares 180 Last Updated: 01.08.2017 Rank Rank (PREVIOU ISIN Sedol RIC Int.Key Company Name Country Currency Component FF Mcap (BEUR) (FINAL) S) HK0000069689 B4TX8S1 1299.HK HK1013 AIA GROUP HK HKD Y 80.6 1 1 CNE1000002H1 B0LMTQ3 0939.HK CN0010 CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H CN HKD Y 60.5 2 2 HK0941009539 6073556 0941.HK 607355 China Mobile Ltd. CN HKD Y 50.8 3 3 CNE1000003G1 B1G1QD8 1398.HK CN0021 ICBC H CN HKD Y 41.3 4 4 CNE1000003X6 B01FLR7 2318.HK CN0076 PING AN INSUR GP CO. OF CN 'H' CN HKD Y 32.0 5 7 CNE1000001Z5 B154564 3988.HK CN0032 BANK OF CHINA 'H' CN HKD Y 31.8 6 5 KYG217651051 BW9P816 0001.HK 619027 CK HUTCHISON HOLDINGS HK HKD Y 31.1 7 6 HK0388045442 6267359 0388.HK 626735 Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing HK HKD Y 28.0 8 8 HK0016000132 6859927 0016.HK 685992 Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. HK HKD Y 20.6 9 10 HK0002007356 6097017 0002.HK 619091 CLP Holdings Ltd. HK HKD Y 20.0 10 9 CNE1000002L3 6718976 2628.HK CN0043 China Life Insurance Co 'H' CN HKD Y 20.0 11 11 KYG2103F1019 BWX52N2 1113.HK HK50CI CK Property Holdings HK HKD Y 18.3 12 12 CNE1000002Q2 6291819 0386.HK CN0098 China Petroleum & Chemical 'H' CN HKD Y 16.4 13 13 HK0823032773 B0PB4M7 0823.HK B0PB4M Link Real Estate Investment Tr HK HKD Y 15.4 14 16 HK0883013259 B00G0S5 0883.HK 617994 CNOOC Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoxx® Hong Kong 210 Index
    BROAD INDICES 1 STOXX® HONG KONG 210 INDEX Stated objective Key facts STOXX global benchmark indices provide a broad yet liquid »Broad and liquid benchmarks for market regions and countries representation of different regions and countries. worldwide The indices are derived from their respective Total Market Index (TMI). They are weighted according to free-float market cap and » Broad number of components cover about 95% of the free-float market cap of the relevant region or country. » Serve as benchmarks for their respective regions/actively managed funds » Serve as an underlying for a variety of financial products, are used for academic research and receive wide media coverage Descriptive statistics Index Market cap (EUR bn.) Components (EUR bn.) Component weight (%) Turnover (%) Full Free-float Mean Median Largest Smallest Largest Smallest Last 12 months STOXX Hong Kong 210 Index 781.3 392.1 1.9 0.5 49.9 0.2 12.7 0.0 7.7 STOXX Hong Kong Total Market Index 816.2 405.0 1.4 0.4 49.9 0.1 12.3 0.0 N/A Supersector weighting (top 10) Country weighting Risk and return figures1 Index returns Return (%) Annualized return (%) Last month YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y Last month YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y STOXX Hong Kong 210 Index 0.6 12.5 19.0 57.5 93.5 7.6 18.9 18.6 15.9 13.7 STOXX Hong Kong Total Market Index 0.7 12.2 18.6 51.6 83.5 8.1 18.4 18.2 14.5 12.6 Index volatility and risk Annualized volatility (%) Annualized Sharpe ratio2 STOXX Hong Kong 210 Index 11.4 12.6 11.9 16.9 17.6 0.9 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.7 STOXX Hong Kong Total Market Index 11.2 12.5 11.8 16.9 18.6 1.0 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.6 Index to benchmark Correlation Tracking error (%) STOXX Hong Kong 210 Index 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.1 7.0 Index to benchmark Beta Annualized information ratio STOXX Hong Kong 210 Index 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 -1.8 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.1 1 For information on data calculation, please refer to STOXX calculation reference guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Financial Buffers Seen Aiding Mega Qatar Infrastructure Projects
    IMF LOAN | Page 2 MASALA ISSUE | Page 4 It’s cheap Brics bank to food or ‘hell’ sell $500mn in Egypt rupee bond Sunday, October 16, 2016 Muharram 15, 1438 AH GLOBAL VALUE: Page 20 Kia Motors rises to GULF TIMES 69th in Interbrand’s 2016 Best Global BUSINESS Brands report Large fi nancial buff ers seen aiding mega Qatar infrastructure projects By Pratap John fi cation in Qatar and will continue to ing cuts, tightening liquidity conditions, expansion. BMI Research also expects Chief Business Reporter drive the country’s GDP growth over the and widespread investor uncertainty, the GCC countries to increasingly turn next decade. BMI said. to the external bond markets for fi nanc- That said, Auberty felt that growth From 2017, it expects a notable diver- ing, in order to rebalance defi cit cover- iven Qatar’s large fi nancial buff - rates would remain well below aver- gence in growth between these states, age away from foreign exchange reserves ers, main infrastructure projects age annual growth of 13% seen between with the UAE and Qatar outperforming, while easing the pressure on domestic Gin the country will carry on, a 2005 and 2014. while Saudi Arabia will be the laggard. banks. senior analyst has said. For Qatar, huge fi nancial reserves and Nearly two years after the start of the Saudi Arabia is reportedly seeking to “As such, we do not expect Qatar to still-strong revenues from the country’s collapse in global energy prices, the eco- borrow up to $8bn from international signifi cantly draw down on its reserves gas sector will ensure continued public nomic outlook for the six GCC econo- banks before the end of the year, and we or assets,” said Raphaele Auberty, Mena sector spending ahead of the FIFA World mies has clearly deteriorated.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 3
    6 CONTENTS 2 Corporate Information 3 Key Financial and Operation Summary 4 Chairman’s Statement 12 Management Discussion and Analysis 26 Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and Production Activities 28 Corporate Governance Report 36 Report of the Directors 45 Biography of Directors and Senior Management 47 Independent Auditor’s Report 52 Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss 53 Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 54 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 56 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 57 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 59 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 140 Financial Summary 2 UNITED ENERGY GROUP LIMITED CORPORATE INFORMATION Directors Legal Advisers in Hong Kong Executive Directors Baker Botts LLP Zhang Hong Wei (Chairman) Simmons & Simmons Zhu Jun Michael Li & Co. Zhang Meiying Angela Ho & Associates in association with Lang Michener LLP Independent Non-Executive Directors Chau Siu Wai Auditors San Fung RSM Hong Kong Zhu Chengwu 29th Floor, Lee Garden Two, 28 Yun Ping Road, Company Secretary Causeway Bay, Hung Lap Kay Hong Kong Principal Place of Business Bermuda Principal Share Suite 2505, 25th Floor, Registrar and Transfer Office Two Pacific Place, Codan Services Limited 88 Queensway, Clarendon House, Hong Kong 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM11, Registered Office Bermuda Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hong Kong Branch Share Hamilton HM11, Registrar and Transfer Office Bermuda Tricor Secretaries Limited Level 22, Hopewell Centre, Principal Bankers 183 Queen’s Road East, China Development Bank, Hong Kong Branch Hong Kong Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd. Bank of Communications Company Limited, Website Hong Kong Branch http://www.uegl.com.hk Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Investing: Globla Comparison of Investment Returns
    Clean Energy Investing: Global Comparison of Investment Returns March 2021 A Joint Report by the International Energy Agency and the Centre for Climate Finance & Investment Table of Contents 03 Executive Summary 05 Introduction 08 Analytical Methods 11 Key Investment Characteristics 14 Results 14 Global Markets 18 Advanced Economies 19 Emerging Market and Developing Economies 20 China 21 Transition Companies 22 The Covid Market Shock 24 Irrational Exuberance? 26 Conclusions 29 Acknowledgments 30 Annex A – Definition of Key Terms 32 Annex B – IEA Scenarios 33 Annex C – Fama-French Five-Factor Model 34 Annex D – Fossil Fuel Portfolio 48 Annex E – Renewable Power Portfolio 2 Executive Summary To shed light on the long-term prospects for clean energy, we investigate the historical financial performance of energy companies around the world in search of broad structural trends. This is the second in a series of joint reports by the International Energy Agency and Imperial College Business School examining the risk and return proposition in energy transitions. In this paper, we extend our coverage of publicly-traded renewable power and fossil fuel companies to the following: 1) global markets, 2) advanced economies, 3) emerging market and developing economies, and 4) China. We calculate the total return and annualized volatility of these portfolios over 5 and 10-year periods. Table 1 shows the 5 and 10-year results, up to December 31, 2020. Table 1 – Summary of Key Findings Global Markets Portfolios Advanced Economies Portfolios Fossil Fuel Renewable
    [Show full text]