Hindsight in Marine Protected Area Selection: a Comparison of Ecological Representation Arising from Opportunistic and Systematic Approaches ⇑ Gretchen J.A
Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 1866–1875 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Hindsight in marine protected area selection: A comparison of ecological representation arising from opportunistic and systematic approaches ⇑ Gretchen J.A. Hansen a, , Natalie C. Ban b,c, Michael L. Jones a, Les Kaufman d, Hazel M. Panes e, Maï Yasué b,f, Amanda C.J. Vincent b a Michigan State University, Quantitative Fisheries Center and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 4882, USA b Project Seahorse, Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 c Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia d Boston University Marine Program, Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02445, USA e Project Seahorse Foundation for Marine Conservation, Gaviola Cmpd, Ma. Theresa Village II. Guadalupe, Cebu 6000, Philippines f Quest University Canada, 3200 University Blvd., Squamish, BC, Canada V8B 0N8 article info abstract Article history: Systematic approaches to site selection for marine protected areas (MPAs) are often favored over oppor- Received 2 June 2010 tunistic approaches as a means to meet conservation objectives efficiently. In this study, we compared Received in revised form 28 December 2010 analytically the conservation value of these two approaches. We locate this study in Danajon Bank, cen- Accepted 1 April 2011 tral Philippines, where many MPAs were established opportunistically based on community preference, Available online 29 April 2011 with few if any contributions from biophysical data.
[Show full text]