NEPA--Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEPA--Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of Final Environmental Agriculture Assessment Forest Service January Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 2011 Gunnison Ranger District, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Cooperating Agency: Gunnison Field Office, Bureau of Land Management Gunnison County, Colorado Sections 9, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 33 and 34, T 49 N, R 4 E, NMPM The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 Environmental Assessment Gunnison County, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Cooperating Agencies: Bureau of Land Management Gunnison Field Office Gunnison County Forest Service Authorized Officer: Charles S. Richmond, Forest Supervisor 2250 HWY 50 Delta, CO 81416 For Information Contact: Niccole Mortenson, NEPA Specialist 2250 HWY 50 Delta, CO 81416 Email: [email protected] Phone: 970-874-6616 Environmental Assessment Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 (Intentionally left blank) v Environmental Assessment Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 SUMMARY The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest (GMUG) proposes to consent to the USDI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to lease the subject lands for geothermal resource recovery with stipulations for the protection of geologic resources; surface and ground water resources; wildlife including Canada lynx, Gunnison sage grouse, bald eagles, raptors and big game; cultural and paleontological resources; special uses; visual resources; and recreation opportunities. The lease nomination is for lands generally located in Sections 9, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 33 and 34, T 49 N, R 4 E, NMPM, in Gunnison County, Colorado about 22 miles southeast of the town of Gunnison. This action is needed to facilitate geothermal resource leasing in an environmentally responsible manner to help meet the increasing interest in geothermal development on Federal lands (Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 211) and to further respond to policy directives calling for clean and renewable energy to meet the nation’s increasing demand for energy. Public involvement included two joint BLM-FS public meetings with presentations, handouts and maps of the lease nomination areas on March 11, 2010 and September 2, 2010 at Western State College in Gunnison, Colorado. Approximately 95 people total attended the meetings. Approximately 125 scoping letters were sent out, published to the internet on the GMUG’s website and the project was listed on the GMUG’s Schedule of Proposed Actions. Fourteen environmental group consortia, individuals/corporations, and state, local and tribal agencies responded during scoping. Using internal and external comments, significant issues were identified for the following broad resources: geologic resources, water, wildlife, special/permitted uses, and visual resources. The leasing analysis was designed to include lease stipulations to protect these and other resources. Leasing in itself has no direct impacts on any resource except socio-economics. Subsequent post-leasing development may have impacts on resources; however, these impacts will be minimized or negated through the application of lease stipulations (restrictions) or through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) if or when future development is proposed. Any post-leasing development would be subject to additional required analysis. Based upon the effects of the alternatives, the Forest Supervisor must decide whether or not to consent to the BLM leasing NFS lands for geothermal resource development and prescribe the terms and conditions (through lease stipulations) with respect to the use and protection of surface resources. The Gunnison Field Office Manager will make recommendations to the BLM Colorado State Director concerning which parcels to offer for lease, which parcels to withdraw, and which additional stipulations should be placed on a lease to protect resources. vi Environmental Assessment Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 (Intentionally left blank) vii Environmental Assessment Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action ....................................................................... 1 1.0 Document Structure .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Geothermal Leasing Process ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Action .................................................................................. 3 1.4 Proposed Action Summary ........................................................................................ 4 1.5 Decision Framework ................................................................................................. 6 1.6 Authorities ............................................................................................................... 6 Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 ......................................................................................... 6 Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 ............................................................................ 6 Energy Policy Act of 2005 ............................................................................................... 6 Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 ............................................................. 6 Executive Order 13423 .................................................................................................... 6 Policy ............................................................................................................................ 7 GMUG Forest Plan ......................................................................................................... 7 Gunnison Field Office RMP ............................................................................................. 7 1.7 Public Involvement ................................................................................................... 8 1.8 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.9 Related Actions ...................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the proposed action .................................................... 13 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Alternatives Considered in Detail ............................................................................. 13 Alternative 1- No Action (Consent to Lease Not Given) .....................................................13 Alternative 2- Proposed Action (Consent to Lease with Stipulations) ...................................13 2.2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ....................................... 27 Consent to lease without stipulations to protect surface resources, (i.e. consent to lease with standard lease terms) ......................................................................................................27 Wait to lease until range-wide protections are in place for Gunnison Sage Grouse .................28 No leasing in occupied Gunnison Sage Grouse habitat ........................................................28 No leasing in occupied Gunnison Sage Grouse habitat until RMP revisions are complete .......28 Consider leasing alternative locations rather than the Tomichi Dome ...................................28 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives ..................................................................................... 29 viii Environmental Assessment Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................... 35 3.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Existing Activities in Proposed Lease & Cumulative Effects Areas............................... 35 Range Allotments ..........................................................................................................35 Outfitter Guides .............................................................................................................36 Recreation
Recommended publications
  • Personal Recollections of Early Denver
    Personal Recollections of Early Denver .J OSEPII EMERSOX S11nTn* Recollections, like everything else, must have a beginning, and my first memory of early Denver has to do with a Fourth of .July Christmas. It has remained vivid, unforgettable, undoubtedly because of th<:' successive shocks to the sensitive ear drums of a small child. Tt was prior to the Chinese riot of 1880 and the large Chinatown of the city, extending from Sixteenth along vVazee and Vlynkoop streets and directly in the rear of the American House for seYeral blocks, was a busy mart, a growth of the steady immi­ gration of the "Celestials" to Colorado, where thousands had been, and still were, employed in placer mining around Central City, at Fairplay, Tarryall, California Gulch, and other gold camps. Chinatmn1 was their suppl~' source. Here \Yere silk and clothing shops, stores of exotic atmosphere with shelves crowded with im­ ports, fine tea, spices, drugs, and foods from China, tapestries, fans, laces, and there were many laundries. Underground floors were tunnels leading to burrows and the larger rooms where Nepen- 1heized sleepers lay in bunks, the air sticky and sweet with the fumes of opium. 'l'he steam laundry hadn't come, and the Chinese had a monop­ oly on laundering. 'l'o homes all over the city trotted the tireless, affable, pig-tailed little yellow men in their blue-black tunics, flap­ ping trousers and felt white-soled slippers, delivering newspaper­ wrapped bundles. We " ·ere living at Coffield 's ''family boarding house,'' a spacious two-story verandahed frame residence where the Colorado National Bank now stands at Seventeenth and Champa streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails
    Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails Canyons of the Ancients National Monument © Kim Gerhardt CANYONS OF THE ANCIENTS NATIONAL MONUMENT Ernest Vallo, Sr. Canyons of the CANYONS Eagle Clan, Pueblo of Acoma: Ancients National OF THE Monument ANCIENTS MAPS & INFORMATION When we come to and the Anasazi a place like Sand Heritage Center Anasazi Heritage Canyon, we pray Center to the ancestral 27501 Highway 184, Hovenweep people. As Indian Dolores, CO 81323 National Monument Canyons people we believe Tel: (970) 882-5600 of the 491 the spirits are Hours: Ancients still here. National Monument 9–5 Summer Mar.- Oct. We ask them Road G for our strength 10–4 Winter Nov.- Feb. and continued https://www.blm.gov/ 160 Mesa Verde survival, and programs/national- 491 National Park thank them conservation-lands/ colorado/canyons-of-the- for sharing their home place. In the Acoma ancients language I say, “Good morning. I’ve brought A public land administered my friends. If we approached in the wrong way, by the Bureau of Land please excuse our ignorance.” Management. 2 Please Stay on Designated Trails Welcome to the Sand Canyon & Rock Creek Trails 3 anyons of the Ancients National Monument was created to protect cultural and Cnatural resources on a landscape scale. It is part of the Bureau of Land Management’s National Landscape Conservation System and includes almost 171,000 acres of public land. The Sand Canyon and Rock Creek Trails are open for hiking, mountain biking, or horseback riding on designated routes only. Most of the Monument is backcountry. Visitors to Canyons of the Ancients are encouraged to start at the Anasazi Heritage Center near Dolores, Mountain Biking Tips David Sanders Colorado, where they can get current information from local rider Dani Gregory: Park Ranger, Canyons of the Ancients: about the Monument and experience the museum’s • Hikers and bikers are supposed to stop for • All it takes is for exhibits, films, and hands-on discovery area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 – 2005 Colorado Directory American Indian Resources
    2004 – 2005 Colorado Directory of American Indian Resources Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs Lieutenant Governor Jane E. Norton, Chair State of Colorado Colorado State Capitol Building 200 East Colfax Avenue, Room 130 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-3027 FAX: 303-866-5469 Website: http://www.colorado.gov/ltgovernor/initiatives/indianaffairs.html Dear Citizens of Colorado: Cultures, societies and individuals are all a product of their histories. Legacies shape us; they define our identity. The American Indians in Colorado are a fundamental part of our heritage and, more importantly, their influence is crucial to Colorado’s character today. With this in mind, I am both proud and honored to have a key role in bettering the lives of Colorado’s American Indian community. The Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs is pleased to present the fifth edition of the Colorado Directory of American Indian Resources. The Commission is dedicated to serving with the Ute Mountain Ute and Southern Ute Tribes, as well as the Native American community throughout Colorado. Through educational, occupational, economic, and health–based efforts, the commission aspires to improve the overall quality of life for Colorado’s American Indians while preserving the culture and traditions that are so important to our history. Government–to–government communication has been and will continue to be imperative in achieving this objective. The Commission, in association with the Colorado Legislature and the Rocky Mountain Indian Chamber of Commerce, has already procured funding for the American Indian Scholarship Fund. Native American specialty license plates, the first of their kind in Colorado, finance the fund with the proceeds from their sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Desert Stone
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2010 Exploring Desert Stone Steven K. Madsen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Folklore Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Madsen, S. K. (2010). Exploring desert stone: John N. Macomb's 1859 expedition to the canyonlands of the Colorado. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exploring Desert Stone Exploring Desert Stone John N. Macomb’s 1859 Expedition to the Canyonlands of the Colorado Steven K. Madsen Logan, Utah Utah State University Press Copyright © 2010 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84319-7800 USUPress.org 978-0-87421-707-0 (cloth) 978-0-87421-708-7 (e-book) The National Trails-Intermountain Region of the National Park Service funded devel- opment of the facsimile of the 1864 Map of Explorations and Surveys in New Mexico and Utah made under the direction of the Secretary of War by Capt. J. N. Macomb, Topographical Engineers, assisted by C. H. Dimmock, C. Engineer, by Frederick W. von Egloffstein. Manufactured in China Printed on acid-free, recycled paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Madsen, Steven K. Exploring desert stone : John N. Macomb’s 1859 expedition to the canyonlands of the Colorado / Steven K.
    [Show full text]
  • Crested Butte Mountain Resort Ski Area Projects Environmental Impact Environmental Statement
    SKI AREA PROJECTS FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FEBRUARY 2019 USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Gunnison Ranger District In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www. ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Topographic Maps, Scale 1:24,000 This List Contains The
    Colorado Topographic Maps, scale 1:24,000 This list contains the quadrangle names and publication dates of all Colorado topographic maps published at the scale of 1:24,000 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). One, non-circulating copy of each map is held in the Map Room Office. The Library does not own maps labeled "lacking." The maps are sorted alphabetically by sheet name. Colorado 1:24,000 Topos -- A Abarr 1974 printed 1977 Abarr SE 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Abeyta 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Adams Lake 1974 printed 1978 (dark), 1978 (light) 1974 (without color) printed 1978 1987 printed 1988 Adena 1963 printed 1965, 1975 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1984 printed 1984 1984 (without color) printed 1984 Adler Creek 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Adobe Downs Ranch, New Mexico-Colorado 1963 printed 1965 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1979 printed 1980 (dark), 1980 (light) Adobe Springs 1969 printed 1972, 1992 1969 (without color) printed 1972 Agate 1970 printed 1973 (dark), 1973 (light) 1970 (without color) printed 1973 Agate Mountain 1983 printed 1983 1994 printed 1998 Aguilar 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Akron 1973 printed 1976 1973 (without color) printed 1976 Akron SE 1973 printed 1976 Akron SW 1973 printed 1976 Alamosa East 1966 printed 1968, 1975 1966 (without color) printed 1968 Alamosa West 1966 printed 1969, 1971 1966 (without color) printed 1969 Aldrich Gulch 1957 printed 1958, 1964, 1975 (dark), 1975 (light) 1957 (without color)
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Jennings' Key to Phlox
    KEY TO PHLOX OF COLORADO PREPARED BY BILL JENNINGS APRIL 29, 1999 The similarity of Phlox flowers from species to species does not offer much upon which to construct a key, except plant stature and habitat, the tack taken in most floras. However, taken together, the dimensions of the plant, leaves, and flowers; characteristics of the calyx; pubescence; habitat; blooming season; and elevation seem to separate the species of Phlox. Considering the similarity of the flowers, most species of Phlox are probably pollinated by the same or similar pollinators. It is probable that only by temporal, ecological, and elevational differences do the taxa maintain their distinctiveness as species. Where species share the same range and habitat, one should expect difficulty in separating species of Phlox. 1. Plants east of Continental Divide...2 1. Plants west of Continental Divide...11 2. Plants of the eastern plains (generally east of I-25)...3 2. Plants of the foothills, mountains, and tundra...6 3. cushionlike, densely caespitose plants, less than about 5 cm tall; leaves densely woolly, closely overlapping, scale-like, less than 5 mm long; flowers white to bluish, tube 5-10 mm, lobes 3-5 mm, style 2-5 mm; blooming mid-May to mid-June, peaking June 9; often in cracks in rock outcrops or on rocky sites, usually on calcareous substrates, in Logan, Weld, and Larimer Counties within about 30 miles of the Wyoming state line...Phlox muscoides (Phlox bryoides) (This can be difficult to distinguish from somewhat caespitose plants of Phlox hoodii, but Phlox muscoides is copiously woolly pubescent, is usually restricted to very rocky sites, and blooms later; see lead 5B for more characteristics of Phlox hoodii).
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers, Prospectors and Trout a Historic Context for La Plata County, Colorado
    Pioneers, Prospectors and Trout A Historic Context For La Plata County, Colorado By Jill Seyfarth And Ruth Lambert, Ph.D. January, 2010 Pioneers, Prospectors and Trout A Historic Context For La Plata County, Colorado Prepared for the La Plata County Planning Department State Historical Fund Project Number 2008-01-012 Deliverable No. 7 Prepared by: Jill Seyfarth Cultural Resource Planning PO Box 295 Durango, Colorado 81302 (970) 247-5893 And Ruth Lambert, PhD. San Juan Mountains Association PO Box 2261 Durango, Colorado 81302 January, 2010 This context document is sponsored by La Plata County and is partially funded by a grant from the Colorado State Historical Fund (Project Number 2008-01-012). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the staff of the Colorado State Historical Fund. Cover photographs: Top-Pine River Stage Station. Photo Source: La Plata County Historical Society-Animas Museum Photo Archives. Left side-Gold King Mill in La Plata Canyon taken in about1936. Photo Source Plate 21, in U.S.Geological Survey Professional paper 219. 1949 Right side-Local Fred Klatt’s big catch. Photo Source La Plata County Historical Society- Animas Museum Photo Archives. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 New Frontiers................................................................................................................ 3 Initial Exploration ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of United States Landslide Maps and Reports Christopher S. Alger and Earl E. Brabb1 Open-File Report 85-585 This Re
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bibliography of United States landslide maps and reports Christopher S. Alger and Earl E. Brabb 1 Open-File Report 85-585 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Menlo Park, California Contents Page Introductlon......................................... 1 Text References...................................... 8 Bibliographies With Landslide References............. 8 Multi State-United States Landslide Maps and Reports. 8 Alabama.............................................. 9 Alaska............................................... 9 American Samoa....................................... 14 Arizona.............................................. 14 Arkansas............................................. 16 California........................................... 16 Colorado............................................. 41 Connecticut.......................................... 51 Delaware............................................. 51 District of Columbia................................. 51 Florida.............................................. 51 Georgi a.............................................. 51 Guam................................................. 51 Hawa i i............................................... 51 Idaho................................................ 52 II1i noi s............................................. 54 Indiana.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation
    Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation Cortez R18W Karle Key Xu R17W T General Setting Mine Xu Xcu 36 yon Can N Xcu McElmo WIND RIVER 32 INDIAN MABEL The Ute Mountain Ute Reservation is located in the northwest RESERVATION MOUNTAIN FT HALL AIN IND RES Little Moude Mine Xcu T N ern portion of New Mexico and the southwestern corner of Colorado UTE PEAK 35 N R16W BLACK 666 (Fig. UM-1). The reservation consists of 553,008 acres in Montezu W Y O M I N G T MOUNTAIN 35 R20W SLEEPING UTE MOUNT N ma and La Plata Counties, Colorado, and San Juan County, New R19W Coche T Mexico. All of these lands belong to the tribe but are held in trust by NORTHWESTERN 34 SHOSHONI HERMANO the U.S. Government. Individually owned lands, or allotments, are IND RES Desert Canyon PEAK N MESA VERDE R14W NATIONAL GREA W Marble located at Allen Canyon and White Mesa, San Juan County, Utah, T SAL SENTINEL Towaoc PARK Wash T LAKE PEAK T and cover 8,499 acres. Tribal lands held in trust within this area cov Towaoc er M E S A 33 1/2 N er 3,597 acres. An additional forty acres are defined as U.S. Govern THE MOUND R15W SKULL VALLEY ment lands in San Juan County, Utah, and are utilized for school pur TEXAS P IND RES ajo Riv UNITAH AND OURAY v INDIAN RESERVATION Na poses. A W CIFIC 6-INCH OIL PIPELINE Ramona GOSHUTE 789 The Allen Canyon allotments are located twelve miles west of IND RES T AH UT 33 Blanding, Utah, and adjacent to the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
    [Show full text]