DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 79 Thursday, No. 224 November 20, 2014 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Status for Gunnison Sage-Grouse; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:26 Nov 19, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\20NOR2.SGM 20NOR2 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 69192 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR species can only be completed by provide conservation benefit to the issuing a rule. In this case, we are species. The Candidate Conservation Fish and Wildlife Service required by a judicially approved Agreement with Assurances for settlement agreement to make a final Gunnison sage-grouse (CCAA), 50 CFR Part 17 determination regarding the Gunnison Gunnison Basin Candidate Conservation [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0108; sage-grouse by no later than November Agreement (CCA), conservation plans, 4500030114] 12, 2014. Elsewhere in today’s Federal multi-county commitments, habitat Register we finalize the designation of improvement projects, and similar non- RIN 1018–AZ20 critical habitat for the species. regulatory conservation actions that This rule will finalize the listing of the address habitat-related impacts and Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus issues are described and evaluated and Plants; Threatened Status for minimus) as a threatened species. under Factor A in this rule. Federal, Gunnison Sage-Grouse The basis for our action. Under the State, and local laws and regulations, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Act, we can conservation easements, and other Interior. determine that a species is an regulatory mechanisms are evaluated endangered or threatened species based ACTION: Final rule. under Factor D. Scientific research on any of five factors: (A) The present activities are described under Factor B SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and or threatened destruction, modification, and throughout this rule where Wildlife Service (Service), determine or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) applicable. Also, conservation efforts threatened species status under the Overutilization for commercial, are described and evaluated as Endangered Species Act of 1973, as recreational, scientific, or educational appropriate under relevant threat amended (Act), for the Gunnison sage- purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) sections throughout this rule. grouse (Centrocercus minimus), a bird The inadequacy of existing regulatory Peer review and public comment. We species from southwestern Colorado and mechanisms; or (E) Other natural or sought comments on the proposed rule southeastern Utah. The effect of this manmade factors affecting its continued from independent and qualified regulation will be to add the Gunnison existence. specialists to ensure that our sage-grouse to the List of Endangered As described in detail below, we have determination is based on scientifically and Threatened Wildlife. determined that the most substantial sound data, assumptions, and analyses. threats to Gunnison sage-grouse DATES: This rule is effective December We invited these peer reviewers to 22, 2014. currently and in the future include comment on our listing proposal. We habitat decline due to human also considered all comments and ADDRESSES: This final rule is available disturbance (Factor A), small population on the internet at http:// information received during each public size and structure (Factor E), drought comment period. www.regulations.gov and http:// (Factor E), climate change (Factor A), www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/ and disease (Factor C). Other threats Previous Federal Actions birds/gunnisonsagegrouse. Comments that are impacting Gunnison sage-grouse Please refer to the proposed listing and materials we received, as well as to a lesser degree or in localized areas rule for the Gunnison sage-grouse (78 supporting documentation we used in include grazing practices inconsistent FR 2486, January 11, 2013) for a detailed preparing this rule, are available for with local ecological conditions, fences, description of previous Federal actions public inspection at http:// invasive plants, fire, mineral concerning this species. Federal actions www.regulations.gov. All of the development, pin˜ on-juniper that have occurred since that comments, materials, and encroachment, large-scale water publication are described below. documentation that we considered in development (Factor A); predation On January 11, 2013, we published a this rulemaking are available by (Factor C), primarily in association with rule proposing to list the Gunnison sage- appointment, during normal business anthropogenic disturbance and habitat grouse as endangered throughout its hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, decline due to human disturbance range (78 FR 2486), and a proposed rule Western Colorado Field Office, 445 (Factor A); and recreation (Factor E). As to designate 1.7 million acres of critical West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 240, described in Factor D below, some habitat for the species (78 FR 2540). We Grand Junction, CO 81501–5720; existing regulatory mechanisms are in opened a public comment period until telephone 970–243–2778. place to conserve Gunnison sage-grouse, March 12, 2013, that was subsequently FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: but individually or collectively they do extended until April 2, 2013 (78 FR Susan Linner, Field Supervisor, U.S. not fully address the substantial threats 15925, March 13, 2013). Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado faced by the species, particularly habitat On July 19, 2013, we announced that Ecological Services Office, 134 Union decline, small population size and we were extending the final rule Blvd., Suite 670, P.O. Box 25486 DFC, structure, drought, climate change, and deadline by 6 months, from September Denver, CO 80225; telephone 303–236– disease. The threats listed above are also 30, 2013, to March 31, 2014; and 4774. Persons who use a acting cumulatively, contributing to the reopened the comment period until telecommunications device for the deaf challenges faced by Gunnison sage- September 3, 2013 (78 FR 43123). This (TDD) may call the Federal Information grouse now and into the future. extension served to solicit additional Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Multiple partners, including private scientific information due to scientific SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: citizens, nongovernmental disagreement regarding the sufficiency organizations, and Tribal, State, and and accuracy of the available data Executive Summary Federal agencies, are engaged in relevant to our listing determinations for Why we need to publish a rule. Under conservation efforts across the range of Gunnison sage-grouse. the Endangered Species Act a species Gunnison sage-grouse. Numerous On September 19, 2013, we may warrant protection through listing conservation actions have been announced the availability of a draft if it is endangered or threatened as those implemented or are planned for economic analysis and draft terms are defined in the Act. Listing a Gunnison sage-grouse, and these efforts environmental assessment for our species as an endangered or threatened have provided and will continue to proposal to designate critical habitat for VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:26 Nov 19, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20NOR2.SGM 20NOR2 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 69193 Gunnison sage-grouse, and reopened the Service with additional time to whenever the scientific data and public comment period on those complete a final listing determination information is relevant to both species. subjects and the proposed listing and for the Gunnison sage-grouse, and if Species Information critical habitat rules until October 19, listed, a final critical habitat 2013. We also announced two planned designation. In the event the Service A detailed summary of Gunnison public informational sessions and decided to list the species as threatened, sage-grouse taxonomy, the species public hearings for the proposed rules the court order also allowed for the description, historical distribution, (78 FR 57604). Service to publish a proposed rule habitat, and life-history characteristics On November 4, 2013, we reopened under section 4(d) of the Act (which are can be found in the 12-month finding the public comment period on the only available for threatened species) published September 28, 2010 (75 FR proposed rules until December 2, 2013, and finalize it with the final listing 59804). More recent scientific and announced the rescheduling of determination on November 12, if information relevant to the species and three public information sessions and appropriate. We decided not to propose our evaluation of the species is included public hearings that were postponed and finalize a 4(d) rule for the Gunnison throughout this final rule. due to the lapse in government sage-grouse at this time, but continue to appropriations in October 2013 (78 FR evaluate the potential for issuing a Current Distribution and Population 65936). section 4(d) rule in the future to tailor Estimates and Trends Public information sessions and the take prohibitions of the Act to those public hearings were held in Gunnison, Gunnison sage-grouse currently occur necessary and advisable to provide for in seven populations in Colorado and
Recommended publications

  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia

    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
  • Stratigraphy and Correlation of Glacial Deposits of the Rocky Mountains, the Colorado Plateau and the Ranges of the Great Basin

    Stratigraphy and Correlation of Glacial Deposits of the Rocky Mountains, the Colorado Plateau and the Ranges of the Great Basin

    STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF GLACIAL DEPOSITS OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, THE COLORADO PLATEAU AND THE RANGES OF THE GREAT BASIN Gerald M. Richmond u.s. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Federal Center, MS 913, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A. INTRODUCTION glaciations (Charts lA, 1B) see Fullerton and Rich- mond, Comparison of the marine oxygen isotope The Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau, and Basin record, the eustatic sea level record, and the chronology and Range Provinces (Fig. 1) together occupy much of of glaciation in the United States of America (this the western interior United States. These regions volume). include approximately 140 mountain ranges that were glaciated during the Pleistocene. Most of the glaciers Historical Perspective were valley glaciers, but ice caps formed on uplands Following early recognition of deposits of two alpine locally. Discussion of the deposits of all of these ranges glaciations (Gilbert, 1890; Ball, 1908; Capps, 1909; would require monographic analysis. To avoid this, Atwood, 1909), deposits of three glaciations gradually representative ranges in each province are reviewed. became widely recognized (Alden, 1912, 1932, 1953; Atwood and Mather, 1912, 1932; Alden and Stebinger, Purpose and Scope 1913; Blackwelder, 1915; Atwood, 1915; Fryxell, 1930; This report summarizes the evidence for correlation Bradley, 1936). Subsequently drift of the intermediate of the Quaternary glacial deposits in 26 broadly glaciation was shown to represent two glacial advances distributed mountain ranges selected on the basis of (Fryxell, 1930; Horberg, 1938; Richmond, 1948, 1962a; availability of detailed information and length of glacial Moss, 1951a; Nelson, 1954; Holmes and Moss, 1955), record. and the older drift was shown to include deposits of Because the glacial deposits rarely are traceable from three glaciations (Richmond, 1957, 1962a, 1964a).
  • Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), Western Colorado: Effects of Stream Capture and Anomalously Rapid Pleistocene River Incision

    Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), Western Colorado: Effects of Stream Capture and Anomalously Rapid Pleistocene River Incision

    CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II themed issue Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), western Colorado: Effects of stream capture and anomalously rapid Pleistocene river incision Andres Aslan1,*, William C. Hood2,*, Karl E. Karlstrom3,*, Eric Kirby4, Darryl E. Granger5,*, Shari Kelley6, Ryan Crow3,*, Magdalena S. Donahue3,*, Victor Polyak3,*, and Yemane Asmerom3,* 1Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 2Grand Junction Geological Society, 515 Dove Court, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Northrop Hall 141, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 202D Wilkinson Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA 5Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA 6New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT opment of signifi cant relief between adjacent through resistant Precambrian bedrock (Fig. 2). stream segments, which led to stream piracy. It has no major river at its base, and is currently Cosmogenic-burial and U-series dating, The response of rivers to the abandonment drained by two underfi t streams, East and West identifi cation of fl uvial terraces and lacus- of Unaweep Canyon illustrates how the Creeks, which drain the northeast and southwest trine deposits, and river profi le reconstruc- mode and tempo of long-term fl uvial incision ends of the canyon, respectively. Starting with tions show that capture of the Gunnison are punctuated by short-term geomorphic the Hayden Survey (Peale, 1877), geologists River by the Colorado River and abandon- events such as stream piracy.
  • Personal Recollections of Early Denver

    Personal Recollections of Early Denver

    Personal Recollections of Early Denver .J OSEPII EMERSOX S11nTn* Recollections, like everything else, must have a beginning, and my first memory of early Denver has to do with a Fourth of .July Christmas. It has remained vivid, unforgettable, undoubtedly because of th<:' successive shocks to the sensitive ear drums of a small child. Tt was prior to the Chinese riot of 1880 and the large Chinatown of the city, extending from Sixteenth along vVazee and Vlynkoop streets and directly in the rear of the American House for seYeral blocks, was a busy mart, a growth of the steady immi­ gration of the "Celestials" to Colorado, where thousands had been, and still were, employed in placer mining around Central City, at Fairplay, Tarryall, California Gulch, and other gold camps. Chinatmn1 was their suppl~' source. Here \Yere silk and clothing shops, stores of exotic atmosphere with shelves crowded with im­ ports, fine tea, spices, drugs, and foods from China, tapestries, fans, laces, and there were many laundries. Underground floors were tunnels leading to burrows and the larger rooms where Nepen- 1heized sleepers lay in bunks, the air sticky and sweet with the fumes of opium. 'l'he steam laundry hadn't come, and the Chinese had a monop­ oly on laundering. 'l'o homes all over the city trotted the tireless, affable, pig-tailed little yellow men in their blue-black tunics, flap­ ping trousers and felt white-soled slippers, delivering newspaper­ wrapped bundles. We " ·ere living at Coffield 's ''family boarding house,'' a spacious two-story verandahed frame residence where the Colorado National Bank now stands at Seventeenth and Champa streets.
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region

    US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
  • Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado

    Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado

    •••••a••• ••••a••••aa•a COLORADO Historical Background Study By BENJAMIN LEVY DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Areheology and Historic Preservation October 15, 1968 National Park Service B&WScans U.S. Department of the Interior ..S·fb·~~ FOREIDRD The object of th.is study is to provide the historical data necessary :fOJ: the proper development of a Master Plan for Curecanti Rec:ceation Area, Colorado. This study, authorized by Resource Study Proposal (RSP) CURE-H-1, seeks to identi:fy historical resources and historic sites lo­ cated within or closely associated with the recreation area. Such an undertaking will enable master planning teams to consider the use o:f historical data in interpre­ tive and development programs and provide £or the protection 0£ historic sites and structures. Ideally, thE! background study ought to precede the master plan team's field investigation. The urgency 0£ the Curecanti plan r1equired this investigation to be undertaken immediately at the beginning of the current :fiscal year and compelled it to be done while the team was in the field. Hopefully, this report will have found its way into the team's hands prior to their completion report. This report does not pretend to be a detailed or de­ £ini tive study of the history 0£ the Curecanti area. The urgency of the c:all of this document and the limited time assigned for its preparation permit little more than the examination of secondary sources, although little i published mateI'ial exists on the history ox that stretch of the Gunnison River from Montrose to Gunnison city.
  • Gunnison Sage Grouse Biological Opinion

    Gunnison Sage Grouse Biological Opinion

    United States Department of Agriculture December 22, 2014 Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 Programmatic Consultation for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse Attached is the regionally developed Biological Opinion for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus) in the States of Colorado and Utah. This Opinion takes effect concurrent with the effective date of the grouse’s listing as a threatened species on December 22nd, 2014. This Opinion replaces the 2010 SGI Conference Report for the Gunnison sage-grouse. Continue to use the 2010 SGI Conference Report for the Greater sage-grouse. Section 1.2 describes the Conversion of the Conference Report to a Biological Opinion. Document expires on 07/30/2040. Citation: DOI, 2014. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Biological Opinion for the Natural Resources Conservation Services’ USDA Farm Bill programs, including the Sage Grouse Initiative, and associated procedures, conservation practices, and conservation measures for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). Denver, Colorado. Contact Chanda Pettie, State Biologist, at 720-544-2804 or [email protected] for information regarding the content of this notice. FOTG, Section II NRCS, CO SEC, T&E December 2014 BIOLOGICAL OPINION 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. [ESA],), and the Interagency Cooperation Regulations (50 CFR 402), this document transmits the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Biological Opinion (Opinion) for the Natural Resources Conservation Services’ (NRCS) USDA Farm Bill programs, including the Sage Grouse Initiative (SGI), and associated procedures, conservation practices, and conservation measures for the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus).
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F

    Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants

    IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants

    Ex-Situ Conservation at Scott Arboretum Public gardens and arboreta are more than just pretty places. They serve as an insurance policy for the future through their well managed ex situ collections. Ex situ conservation focuses on safeguarding species by keeping them in places such as seed banks or living collections. In situ means "on site", so in situ conservation is the conservation of species diversity within normal and natural habitats and ecosystems. The Scott Arboretum is a member of Botanical Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), which works with botanic gardens around the world and other conservation partners to secure plant diversity for the benefit of people and the planet. The aim of BGCI is to ensure that threatened species are secure in botanic garden collections as an insurance policy against loss in the wild. Their work encompasses supporting botanic garden development where this is needed and addressing capacity building needs. They support ex situ conservation for priority species, with a focus on linking ex situ conservation with species conservation in natural habitats and they work with botanic gardens on the development and implementation of habitat restoration and education projects. BGCI uses the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to identify the level of threat to plants. In-depth analyses of the data contained in the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List are published periodically (usually at least once every four years). The results from the analysis of the data contained in the 2008 update of the IUCN Red List are published in The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; see www.iucn.org/redlist for further details.
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
  • Natural Heritage Assessment of the Uncompahgre River Basin

    Natural Heritage Assessment of the Uncompahgre River Basin

    The Uncompahgre River Basin A Natural Heritage Assessment Volume I Prepared for Valley Land Conservancy Montrose, Colorado March, 1999 By Peggy Lyon, Tom Stephens, Jeremy Siemers, Denise Culver, Phyllis Pineda, and Jennifer Zoerner Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523 User’s Guide The Uncompahgre Basin Biological Assessment conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Volume I presents all potential conservation sites that have been identified in the Uncompahgre Basin that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas. Volume II focuses exclusively on wetland and riparian areas. Volume II also presents “locally significant areas.” These are sites that are among the most important wetlands in the Uncompahgre Basin, but they are not unique from a national or statewide perspective, and therefore these sites did not receive a Biodiversity Rank. Additionally, Volume II presents an assessment of the wetland functions performed by each site that was surveyed. These functional assessments are intended to provide the user with a more complete picture of the value wetlands and riparian areas provide to Uncompahgre Basin residents. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage Methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s List of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity.
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy

    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy

    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and