DOCSLIB.ORG

Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (PBS-PQ100.1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (PBS-PQ100.1) CHAPTER 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (PBS-PQ100.1) Arrangement of Chapters Chapter 1: General Requirements Appendix 1.A: Life Cycle Cost Example Chapter 2: Site Planning and Landscape Design Chapter 3: Architectural and Interior Design Chapter 4: Structural Engineering (Includes Seismic Design) Chapter 5: Mechanical Engineering Chapter 6: Electrical Engineering Appendix 6.A: Energy Efficient Design of New Buildings Chapter 7: Fire Protection Engineering Chapter 8: Security Design Index PBS-PQ100.1 June 14, 1996 Page i FACILITIES STANDARDS FOR THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE CHAPTER 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Purpose of the Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service ......................................................................................................... 1 Arrangement of Chapters.................................................................................... 3 Applicability of the Facilities Standards ........................................................................ 4 GSA Building Types .......................................................................................... 4 Office Buildings...................................................................................... 4 Courts...................................................................................................... 4 Border Stations........................................................................................ 4 Child Care Centers.................................................................................. 4 Other Building Types.............................................................................. 5 Types of Facilities .............................................................................................. 5 New Construction of GSA Owned Facilities .......................................... 5 Repair and Alteration Projects ................................................................ 5 Historic Buildings ................................................................................... 5 General Design Philosophy............................................................................................ 6 Design Quality ........................................................................................ 6 Life Expectancy ...................................................................................... 6 Frequent Changes ................................................................................... 6 Cost Effectiveness................................................................................... 6 Building Maintenance............................................................................. 7 Art in Architecture .................................................................................. 7 Codes and Standards...................................................................................................... 9 Building Codes ................................................................................................... 9 Editions of National Codes ..................................................................... 9 Conflicts between Codes and GSA Requirements.................................. 9 Deviations from Building Code Provisions ............................................ 9 Local Building Codes............................................................................ 10 Code Requirements for Alterations....................................................... 10 Zoning Ordinances................................................................................ 10 Page ii PBS-PQ100.1 June 14, 1996 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Mandatory Design Standards ........................................................................... 11 Accessibility Standards......................................................................... 11 Conflicts with Historic Preservation ..................................................... 11 Energy Conservation Standards............................................................ 11 Compliance with National Environmental Policy Act....................................................................................................... 12 Environmental Policies ................................................................................................ 14 Building Materials ............................................................................................ 14 Prohibited Materials.............................................................................. 14 Lead-Based Paint in Alteration Projects................................................................................................ 14 Recycled Materials................................................................................ 14 Abatement of Asbestos in Existing Buildings .................................................. 15 Design ................................................................................................... 16 Construction.......................................................................................... 16 Inspections ............................................................................................ 16 Laboratories .......................................................................................... 16 Radon Mitigation.............................................................................................. 17 New Construction ................................................................................. 17 Alterations............................................................................................. 17 Design Considerations .......................................................................... 17 Submission Requirements............................................................................................ 18 Specifications Requirements ............................................................................ 18 Technical Requirements for Specifications........................................... 18 Life Cycle Costing ....................................................................................................... 20 Cost Elements................................................................................................... 20 Notation ................................................................................................ 20 Sunk Costs ............................................................................................ 21 First Costs ............................................................................................. 21 Non-recurring Future Costs .................................................................. 21 Combined Procedure............................................................................. 22 Uniform Annually Recurring Constant Dollar Costs ............................ 22 Annually Recurring Costs..................................................................... 22 Recurring Fuel Costs............................................................................. 23 PBS-PQ100.1 June 14, 1996 Page iii FACILITIES STANDARDS FOR THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE Procedures and Approach................................................................................. 24 Defining Alternates............................................................................... 24 Comparison of Design Alternates ......................................................... 24 Analysis Period ..................................................................................... 24 First Costs ............................................................................................. 25 Future Cost Projections......................................................................... 25 Changing Cost Relationships ................................................................ 26 Residual Service Worth ........................................................................ 27 Analysis Presentation............................................................................ 27 Computer Programs .............................................................................. 27 Sensitivity Analysis............................................................................... 28 Interpretations ....................................................................................... 28 Systems Selection ................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX 1.A Life Cycle Cost Example Life Cycle Cost Example ........................................................................................1.A-1 Life Cycle Cost Summary ...........................................................................1.A-1 References ...................................................................................................1.A-1 The Sample Building...................................................................................1.A-2 Mechanical and Architectural Systems Alternates ......................................1.A-3 Alternate #1: (Base System).............................................................1.A-3 Alternate #2......................................................................................1.A-4 Alternate #3......................................................................................1.A-4 Alternate #4......................................................................................1.A-4 Energy Analysis...........................................................................................1.A-5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Complying with All Laws” During Design and Construction by Eric Pempus, AIA
    Submitted August 9, 2016 “Complying with all laws” during design and construction By Eric Pempus, AIA Consider this situation: You have been awarded a commission to design a building for a new client. You propose using the AIA’s Standard Form of Agreement B101 as your owner-architect contract, but the client insists you sign a version of the B101 “with just a few minor changes.” You notice that one of those changes requires you to “comply with all laws, rules, and regulations," rather than, as the B101 states, to “review laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the Architect’s services.” That changed language should be setting off alarm bells for you. One of the most overlooked yet dangerous pitfalls for an architect is a provision in a legal document requiring a design professional to “comply with all laws, rules, and regulations" or similar language. However, such a provision can create a trap for an unsuspecting architect. The problems with “complying with all codes” A large number of laws apply to the design and construction of buildings. These laws govern: life safety (national model building codes as well as local variations) fire protection accessibility (ADA as well as local requirements) zoning occupant safety (e.g., OSHA) sustainable design wetlands preservation public health historic preservation and employment (federal, state, and local). It may in fact be impossible to comply with all laws that apply to a particular project because those laws may have contradictory provisions. To illustrate this point, the Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Why Homeowners Should Not Obtain the Building Permit for Construction Projects
    MASSACHUSETTS FEDERATION OF BUILDING OFFICIALS, Inc. .. .. ,~> . A.:t' ··.·• President - Dan Walsh Past Presidents Vice President - Curtis Meskus David Moore, Steve Frederickson Treasure - David Jensen Paul Tacy, Robert Camacho Secretary - Michael Mendoza Why homeowners should not obtain the building permit for construction projects. Massachusetts homeowners are allowed to obtain their own building permit for renovations and improvements to their homes. Obtaining your own building permit comes with significant responsibility and risk. Professionals recommend that only homeowners with significant experience and skill renovating homes and up to date knowledge of building codes pull their own permits. Before you decide to apply for your own building permit be sure you know what will be required to comply with the new Massachusetts building code and all related state and local requirements. Not knowing can cause significant project delays and inconvenience and potentially cost you thousands of dollars to rectify mistakes. For example, if work on a project is halfway done and it is not compliant with structural or energy code you may have to remove the work and replace it to meet the new code. The Risks of Homeowner - Obtained Permits Excluded from the Guaranty Fund: When the homeowner obtains a building permit they are not eligible to access the Guaranty Fund established by the Home Improvement Law, M.G.L. c142A. This fund was created to protect homeowners from losses incurred as a result of contractor or sub-contractor work performed in a poor or un-workmanlike manner, or work that is in violation of common law or code. For example if a homeowner obtains the building permit and hires a contractor who abandons the job because he priced it too low, the money lost cannot be recovered from the Guaranty Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Airflow Simulations Around OA Intake Louver with Electronic Velocity
    Airflow Simulations around OA Intake Louver with Electronic Velocity Sensors Hwataik Han*1, Douglas P. Sullivan2 and William J. Fisk3 1 Professor, Kookmin University, Korea 2 Research Associate, Indoor Environment Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA 3 Director, Indoor Environment Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA Abstract It is important to control outdoor airflow rates into HVAC systems in terms of energy conservation and healthy indoor environment. Technologies are being developed to measure outdoor air (OA) flow rates through OA intake louvers on a real time basis. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the airflow characteristics through an OA intake louver numerically in order to provide suggestions for sensor installations. Airflow patterns are simulated with and without electronic air velocity sensors within cylindrical probes installed between louver blades or at the downstream face of the louver. Numerical results show quite good agreements with experimental data, and provide insights regarding measurement system design. The simulations indicate that velocity profiles are more spatially uniform at the louver outlet relative to between louver blades, that pressure drops imposed by the sensor bars are smaller with sensor bars at the louver outlet, and that placement of the sensor bars between louver blades substantially increases air velocities inside the louver. These findings suggest there is an advantage to placing the sensor bars at the louver outlet face. Keywords: ventilation; outdoor
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRICAL CODE* ______*Editor’S Note: Ordinance No
    ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE Chapter 7 ELECTRICAL CODE* __________ *Editor’s note: Ordinance No. 09-11, adopted April 28, 2009, amended Chapter 7, in its entirety, to read as herein set out. __________ § 7-1. Title and Scope. § 7-2. Definitions. § 7-3. Availability of Codes. § 7-4. Administration and Enforcement. § 7-5. Reserved. § 7-6. Permits and Fees. § 7-7. General Provisions. § 7-1. Title and Scope. A. Title. This chapter shall be known as the "Arlington County Electrical Code" and may be so cited. B. Scope--New electrical systems. This Code shall apply to electrical systems and to parts thereto which are hereafter installed in buildings of the occupancy classifications enumerated in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. (Ord. No. 89-25, 9-23-89); Ord. No. 07-13, 9-18-07, effective 10-1-07; Ord. No. 08-08, 4-19-08, effective 7-1-08; Ord. No. 09-11, 4-28-09) § 7-2. Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: “Building Official” means the Inspection Services Division Chief of Arlington County or his designee. “Construction Code Inspector” means a qualified person charged with the inspections of all electrical systems and electrical work performed in the County. (Ord. No. 89-25, 9-23-89; Ord. No. 95-14, 8-8-95; Ord. No. 97-7, 4-12-97; Ord. No. 07-13, 9-18-07, effective 10-1- 07; Ord. No. 08-08, 4-19-08, effective 7-1-08; Ord. No.
    [Show full text]
  • 20171 Minimum Design and Construction Requirements
    Virginia Housing Development Authority 20171 Minimum Design and Construction Requirements Requirements for All Developments The following requirements were created to address issues related to the design, construction, maintenance, marketing, life cycle costs and aesthetic concerns for developments utilizing low income housing tax credits (LIHTC), and/or developments financed by the Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA). Submission requirements for VHDA loan applications are listed on the Architectural & Engineering Review sheet which can be found at the conclusion of the Minimum Design and Construction Requirements (MDCR). Submission requirements for the LIHTC program are contained in the tax credit application. Drawings, specifications and scope of work are to comply with the latest applicable issue of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC)2, International Building Code (IBC)3, other applicable Virginia and national codes, requirements of localities, prevailing design and construction practices and the Minimum Design and Construction Requirements of VHDA. Installation of materials, equipment, products, and building systems are to be per the manufacturers’ requirements, specifications, and recommendations. All developments are to comply with accessibility requirements of USBC. Requirements for New Construction SITE WORK 1. Finished floor elevations of buildings are to be a minimum of 8 inches higher than the adjoining finished grade. When achieving an 8 inch height separation is not feasible, due to accessibility requirements or other conditions, provide an alternate solution acceptable to VHDA. 2. Areas around buildings are to be graded to have a minimum 5% slope away from foundation walls for a minimum distance of 10 feet, per IBC. Install yard drains, storm inlets, or drainage pipes under concrete walks to drain properly if the space between foundation walls and concrete walks is less than 10 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Codes and Housing
    Building Codes and Housing Building Codes and Housing David Listokin Rutgers University David B. Hattis Building Technology Inc. Abstract This article examines whether and to what extent building codes affect housing costs. It first describes these technical provisions, then considers how building codes could theoretically affect housing costs, and finally analyzes empirical studies on the subject. While the latter are dated and suffer from other limitations, the more rigorous quan­ titative analyses indicate that codes increase housing costs by 5 percent or less. Further, building codes are in a state of flux and we need to examine how the current generation of regulations affects housing. Thus, building codes merit contemporary investigation; however, these regulations have much less impact on housing costs compared to other regulations such as zoning and subdivisions requirements. Introduction and Summary This article considers the regulation of housing construction (single-family and multifamily, new construction and rehabilitation of existing buildings), focusing on the building code (a broad term specifically defined in this article). It first describes the building code and then traces its history. The history of the building code is important because numerous events and disparate parties have shaped the code, which currently is in a state of evolution. The code is moving toward two national model templates that influence local building code regulations, and away from the three regional-oriented model codes that have been influencing local regulations. In theory, the building code could adversely affect housing production and could increase housing costs through both substantive (technical) and administrative impediments. Examples of the former include restrictions of cost-saving materials and technologies and barriers to mass production; the latter encompasses such barriers as administrative conflicts among different administering parties (for example, building and fire departments) and inadequately trained inspectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Measurements of a Unique Louver
    Performance Measurements Grant O. Musgrove Southwest Research Institute, of a Unique Louver Particle San Antonio, TX 78238 e-mail: [email protected] Separator for Gas Turbine Engines Karen A. Thole Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Department, Solid particles, such as sand, ingested into gas turbine engines, reduce the coolant flow The Pennsylvania State University, in the turbine by blocking cooling channels in the secondary flow path. One method to University Park, PA 16802 remove solid particles from the secondary flow path is to use an inertial particle separa- tor because of its ability to incur minimal pressure losses in high flow rate applications. In this paper, an inertial separator is presented that is made up of an array of louvers Eric Grover followed by a static collector. The performance of two inertial separator configurations was measured in a unique test facility. Performance measurements included pressure Joseph Barker loss and collection efficiency for a range of Reynolds numbers and sand sizes. To comple- ment the measurements, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional computational United Technologies Corporation – results are presented for comparison. Computational predictions of pressure loss agreed Pratt & Whitney, with measurements at high Reynolds numbers, whereas predictions of sand collection East Hartford, CT 06108 efficiency for a sand size range 0–200lm agreed within 10% of experimental measure- ments over the range of Reynolds numbers. Collection efficiency values were measured to be as high as 35%, and pressure loss measurements were equivalent to less than 1% pres- sure loss in an engine application. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4007568] Introduction operating principle of inertial separators is to cause the particle- laden flow to abruptly change trajectory, whereby the particles do Aircraft gas turbines ingest solid particles during takeoff, land- not react to the change in flow direction due to their larger inertia ing, and while flying in dusty environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Code Compliance: Managing the Risks
    Fall 2016 Building code compliance: managing the risks To many architects and engineers (A/E’s), the words Gail S. Kelley, P.E., J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC “building code” have a distinctly negative connotation. This is not entirely surprising— the words often come up in the context of an obscure requirement that no one understands. Or even worse, two obscure requirements that appear to contradict each other. Being able to design to the applicable building code is a non-negotiable In agreeing to comply with applicable codes, Rather than developing an entire building element of an A/E’s work. however, the A/E should be careful to code, states generally base their codes on a Even if a contract does not understand exactly what they are agreeing to. model code developed by a standards require compliance with In addition, if there are aspects of the design organization. For most of the 20th century, that the A/E is not familiar with, or the there were three commonly-used model applicable codes, courts will project is in a jurisdiction in which the A/E codes in the U.S.: the Uniform Building Code generally find that failure to does not typically work, the A/E might want (UBC), the Building Officials Code comply with the building to consider using a code consultant. Administrators National Building Code (BOCA/NBC) and the Standard Building Code code is negligence. Model codes (SBC). The UBC was primarily used in the Building codes and standards are the midwestern and western states, the BOCA/ rules and guidelines that specify the minimum NBC was used in the northeastern states and acceptable level of safety for buildings and the SBC was used in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • General Q. How Can I File a Building Code Or Zoning Complaint?
    Inspectors Schedule Q. What are the inspectors’ office hours? A. The Building Inspector’s hours are 8:00-10:00am and 12:00-2:00pm M thru F. The Wiring Inspector’s hours are 8:00-9:00am and 2:30-4:00pm M thru F. The Plumbing and Gas Inspector’s hours are 8:00-9:00am and 3:00-4:00pm M thru F. Q. What are the inspection times? A. The building inspections are conducted from 10:00am-12:00pm and 2:00-3:30pm M thru F. The wiring inspections are conducted from 9:00am-2:30pm M thru F. General Q. How can I file a Building Code or Zoning Complaint? A. In order to file a complaint, click on the Request for Enforcement Link. Form must be filled out completely. Permits Information Q. Does a contractor need to register with Town of Wellesley before he/she can apply for a permit? A. All Contractors and Designees need to register with the Town before they can do work in the town. They must come to the Town Hall Building Department with the licenses they are registering. No photo copies will be excepted and contractor must appear in person. Q. When is a building, gas, plumbing, or electrical permit required? A. All work that is regulated by the Mass State Building Code 780 CMR 110.0 requires a permit. With very few exceptions, a permit is required for most building, gas, plumbing, or electrical work. Please error on the side of caution and contact the Building Department to verify if work to be performed requires a permit.
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance House Best Practices Guide
    New York State Energy Research & Development Authority High Performance House Best Practices Guide Design Intelligence for Energy Performance in Single Family Homes TABLE OF CON T EN T S High Performance House 1.1 Initial Work................................... 3 1.2 Process.......................................... 4 1.3 Testing........................................... 4 1.3.1 Building Construction.............................. 4 1.3.2 Building Form and Siting......................... 5 1.3.3 Passive Sustainable Strategies................ 6 1.3.4 Active Sustainable Strategies................... 14 1.4 Conclusions................................... 14 1.4.1 Additional Recommendations.................. 15 2 1.1 INitiAL WORK 1.1 Initial Work ON cti Preliminary analysis looked purely at geometric implications on energy use. This theoretical investigation tested a variety of building forms and found two general guidelines that govern performance. Across all building manipulations, results showed that forms minimizing volume and RODU T maximizing southern exposure perform best. This lines with rational thought; increased volume N increases the volume of required conditioned space, while maximizing southern exposure allows I for greatest winter solar gains and daylighting. Following this study, energy analysis was given for three, previously conceived housing designs – “Slope House”, “Underground House” and “X House”. In all cases, formal design (siting, building form, orientation) were given, fixed parameters. This proved a challenge to the energy optimization of the house. For the “Slope House”, building volume opens to the west without the benefit of southern expo- sure on the open face. Passive solar gains were minimal, with excessive shading on south facing windows. The majority of glazing is to the north, which effectively cuts the building’s thermal resistance/storage without the offsetting solar gains received on southern exposures.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Building Code International Building
    WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 51-50 WAC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2018 Edition Includes adoption of and amendments to the 2018 International Existing Building Code and ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 Washington State Building Code Council Effective July 1, 2020 Copies of the State Building Codes and complete copies of the 2018 International Building Code as published by the International Code Council may be obtained from: Washington Association of Building Officials Post Office Box 7310 Olympia, Washington 98507-7310 (360) 628-8669 www.wabobookstore.org or toll free in Washington State at (888) 664-9515 The 2018 International Building Code, as published by the International Code Council, may be viewed at the following website: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2018P4 First Edition Titled International Building Code Chapter 51-50 WAC Effective July 1, 2020 Preface Authority: The International Building Code (Chapter 51-50 WAC) is adopted by the Washington State Building Code Council pursuant to Chapters 19.27 and 70.92 RCW. These codes were first adopted by reference by the Washington State Legislature in 1974. In 1985, the Legislature delegated the responsibility of adoption and amendment of these codes to the State Building Code Council. Code Precedence: The State Building Code Act, Chapter 19.27 RCW, establishes the following order of precedence among the documents adopted as parts of the State Building Code: International Building Code, Standards and amendments -WAC 51-50; International Residential Code, Standards and amendments – WAC 51-51; International Mechanical Code, Standards and amendments - WAC 51-52; International Fire Code, Standards and amendments - WAC 51-54A; Uniform Plumbing Code, Standards and amendments - WAC 51-56 Where there is a conflict between codes, an earlier named code takes precedence over a later named code.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Building Delivery Process
    An Overview of the Building Delivery CHAPTER Process 1 (How Buildings Come into Being) CHAPTER OUTLINE 1.1 PROJECT DELIVERY PHASES 1.11 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 1.2 PREDESIGN PHASE 1.12 POSTCONSTRUCTION PHASE: 1.3 DESIGN PHASE PROJECT CLOSEOUT 1.4 THREE SEQUENTIAL STAGES IN DESIGN PHASE 1.13 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN- BID-BUILD METHOD 1.5 CSI MASTERFORMAT AND SPECIFICATIONS 1.14 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: 1.6 THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM DESIGN-­NEGOTIATE-BUILD METHOD 1.7 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE BIDDING 1.15 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS MANAGEMENT-RELATED METHODS 1.8 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: THE SURETY BONDS 1.16 PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD: DESIGN-BUILD METHOD 1.9 PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE: SELECTING THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND PROJECT 1.17 INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD DELIVERY 1.18 FAST-TRACK PROJECT SCHEDULING 1.10 CONSTRUCTION PHASE: SUBMITTALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION Building construction is a complex, significant, and rewarding process. It begins with an idea and culminates in a structure that may serve its occupants for several decades, even centuries. Like the manufacturing of products, building construction requires an ordered and planned assembly of materials. It is, however, far more complicated than product manufacturing. Buildings are assembled outdoors by a large number of diverse constructors and artisans on all types of sites and are subject to all kinds of weather conditions. Additionally, even a modest-sized building must satisfy many performance criteria and legal constraints, requires an immense variety of materials, and involves a large network of design and production firms. Building construction is further complicated by the fact that no two buildings are identical; each one must be custom built to serve a unique function and respond to its specific context and the preferences of its owner, user, and occupant.
    [Show full text]