DOCSLIB.ORG

OCHA - CDEMA Joint Interoperability Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OCHA - CDEMA Joint Interoperability Manual OCHA - CDEMA Joint Interoperability Manual Interoperability in Action Lessons Learned What you Need to Know Case Studies Gender Matters Remember Disclaimer: This is a first version of the OCHA-CDEMA Joint Interoperability Manual. It is a working draft which is to be finalized after the After Action Review from Hurricane Dorian as well as the Review of the Regional Response Mechanism (RRM) have been completed, and following the approval of the document by both CDEMA and OCHA. A second version of the manual will be produced after the 2020 hurricane season. The information in this Manual has been sourced from existing CDEMA, OCHA and IASC documents. All external sources used have been appropriately cited. This document covers humanitarian aid activities implemented through the project “Strengthen integrated and cohesive preparedness capacity at a regional, national and community level in the Caribbean”. This project is a joint initiative with the Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the United Nations Develop- ment Programme (UNDP), the Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA) and the Interna- tional Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). Financial assistance was provided by the European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO). This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union (EU). The views expressed herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of any of the partners involved in this project, nor the EU. Neither the partners, nor the EU are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................5 SECTION 2: CDEMA AND OCHA: WORKING TOGETHER ...........................................................................................9 SECTION 3: CARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CDEMA) ......................................13 a. CDEMA’s mandate ...................................................................................................................................13 b. CDEMA governance mechanism ............................................................................................................13 i. The Council ...............................................................................................................................................13 ii. The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) ..............................................................................................14 iii. Coordinating Unit (CU) .............................................................................................................................14 c. Basic principles of the Regional Disaster Response Support Doctrine (RDRSD) .....................................14 d. Comprehensive Disaster Management (CDM) ..........................................................................................15 SECTION 4: OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) .......................................16 a. OCHA’s mandate ..........................................................................................................................................16 b. The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) ...........................................................................................17 c. Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) ..........................................................................................................17 d. Humanitarian principles ..............................................................................................................................18 e. OCHA Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean (OCHA ROLAC) ..........................................19 SECTION 5: KEY REGIONAL FORUMS AND PARTNERS ..........................................................................................20 a. National Disaster Management Organizations (NDMOs) .........................................................................20 b. United Nations agencies .............................................................................................................................20 c. International Red Cross and Red Crescent (RCRC) Movement .................................................................21 d. The Regional Group for Risk, Emergencies and Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean (REDLAC) ............................................................................................................................................21 e. The Eastern Caribbean Development Partner Group (ECDPG) ..................................................................22 i. ECDPG for Disaster Management (ECDPG/DM) ....................................................................................23 SECTION 6: CDEMA’s REGIONAL COORDINATION ARCHITECTURE AND MECHANISMS ...................................24 a. CDEMA Participating States (PSs) .............................................................................................................24 b. CDEMA Sub-Regional Focal Points (SRFPs) ..............................................................................................24 c. The Damage Assessment and Needs Analysis (DANA) Continuum .........................................................25 d. The Regional Response Mechanism (RRM) ...............................................................................................26 i. Regional Coordination Centre (RCC) .......................................................................................................26 ii. Regional Coordination Plan (RCP) ..........................................................................................................27 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................5 SECTION 2: CDEMA AND OCHA: WORKING TOGETHER ...........................................................................................9 SECTION 3: CARIBBEAN DISASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (CDEMA) ......................................13 a. CDEMA’s mandate ...................................................................................................................................13 b. CDEMA governance mechanism ............................................................................................................13 i. The Council ...............................................................................................................................................13 ii. The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) ..............................................................................................14 iii. Coordinating Unit (CU) .............................................................................................................................14 c. Basic principles of the Regional Disaster Response Support Doctrine (RDRSD) .....................................14 d. Comprehensive Disaster Management (CDM) ..........................................................................................15 SECTION 4: OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) .......................................16 a. OCHA’s mandate ..........................................................................................................................................16 b. The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) ...........................................................................................17 c. Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) ..........................................................................................................17 d. Humanitarian principles ..............................................................................................................................18 e. OCHA Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean (OCHA ROLAC) ..........................................19 SECTION 5: KEY REGIONAL FORUMS AND PARTNERS ..........................................................................................20 a. National Disaster Management Organizations (NDMOs) .........................................................................20 b. United Nations agencies .............................................................................................................................20 c. International Red Cross and Red Crescent (RCRC) Movement .................................................................21 d. The Regional Group for Risk, Emergencies and Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean (REDLAC) ............................................................................................................................................21 e. The Eastern Caribbean Development Partner Group (ECDPG) ..................................................................22 i. ECDPG for Disaster Management (ECDPG/DM) ....................................................................................23 SECTION 6: CDEMA’s REGIONAL COORDINATION ARCHITECTURE AND
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Employing Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Improve Situational Awareness and Operational Physical Routines
    Proposal Title: Employing Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Improve Situational Awareness and Operational Physical Routines Used to Predict Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensity A Proposal Submitted to NOAA Funding Opportunity: NOAA-OAR-WPO-2021-2006592 Competition Area: Observations Principal Investigator: Dr. Jun A. Zhang University of Miami 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149 (305) 361-4557 [email protected] Co-Principal Investigator Dr. Joseph J. Cione Hurricane Research Division, AOML/NOAA 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149 (305) 213-0886 [email protected] Institutional Representative Eva Leach Sponsored Programs Specialist, Research Administration Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149 (305) 421-4635 [email protected] Proposed period: 2 years (August 1, 2021 – July 31, 2023) Requested budget: 1st Year: $299,182; 2nd Year: $299,173; Total budget: $598,355 Year 1 Year 2 Total U. Miami $288,415 $288,176 $576,591 (including the (including the (including the indirect cost indirect cost of indirect cost of of $59,514) $59,465) $118,979) HRD/AOML/NOAA $10,767 $10,997 $21,764 (field travel) (field travel) (field travel) Total Project Cost $299,182 $299,173 $598,355 1 Proposal Title: Employing Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Improve Situational Awareness and Operational Physical Routines Used to Predict Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensity A Proposal Submitted to NOAA Funding Opportunity: NOAA-OAR-WPO-2021-2006592 Competition Area: Observations Principal Investigator: Dr. Jun A. Zhang, University of Miami Co-Principal Investigator: Dr. Joseph J. Cione, HRD/AOML/NOAA NOAA Collaborators: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of National Hurricane Center Forecasts of Extratropical Transition
    10C.2 Verification of National Hurricane Center Forecasts of Extratropical Transition John L. Beven II NOAA/NWS/NCEP/National Hurricane Center I. Introduction become TCs in a process known as tropical transition (Davis and Bosart 2004). More A great variety of cyclonic circulations commonly, TCs leaving the tropical environment exist in the atmosphere, each with its characteristic interact with baroclinic systems in the westerlies. structure and driving energy (Beven 1997, Figure This causes the TCs to become frontal or 1). Of particular interest is the tropical cyclone extratropical cyclones with the driving energy (TC), which has a warm-core non-frontal thermal derived from air mass contrast and the strongest structure generated by diabatic heat release from winds typically more than 100 km from the center, convective activity near the center. The strongest accompanied by significantly changed winds and heaviest rains in a tropical cyclone are precipitation patterns. This process is known as typically within 100 km of the center with extratropical transition (ET). maximum sustained winds sometimes as high as 90 ms-1. There are several studies of ET which highlight the many ways a TC can interact with a baroclinic environment and the variety of resulting structures. These include the Thorncroft and Jones (2000) study of Hurricane Iris which became a powerful baroclinic cyclone with a warm-core structure, the Abraham et al. (2004) study of Hurricane Michael, and the Beven (2002) study of interrupted and failed transitions. These studies show the complexity of the process, which can pose a significant challenge to TC forecasters trying to predict ET.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/01/21 04:51 PM UTC JULY 2003 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1455
    1454 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 131 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2001 JOHN L. BEVEN II, STACY R. STEWART,MILES B. LAWRENCE,LIXION A. AVILA,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, AND RICHARD J. PASCH NOAA/NWS/Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 19 July 2002, in ®nal form 9 December 2002) ABSTRACT Activity during the 2001 hurricane season was similar to that of the 2000 season. Fifteen tropical storms developed, with nine becoming hurricanes and four major hurricanes. Two tropical depressions failed to become tropical storms. Similarities to the 2000 season include overall activity much above climatological levels and most of the cyclones occurring over the open Atlantic north of 258N. The overall ``lateness'' of the season was notable, with 11 named storms, including all the hurricanes, forming after 1 September. There were no hurricane landfalls in the United States for the second year in a row. However, the season's tropical cyclones were responsible for 93 deaths, including 41 from Tropical Storm Allison in the United States, and 48 from Hurricanes Iris and Michelle in the Caribbean. 1. Overview of the 2001 season cycleÐsimultaneously exhibiting characteristics of both tropical and extratropical cyclones (Hebert 1973). The National Hurricane Center (NHC) tracked 15 No hurricanes struck the United States during 2001. tropical cyclones (TCs) that achieved tropical storm or The season thus joins the 2000, 1990, and 1951 seasons hurricane strength in the Atlantic basin during 2001 as years in which eight or more hurricanes occurred (Table 1). Nine of these became hurricanes and four without a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa and Noaa Flew Unmanned Aircraft Into Hurricane Noel
    NASA News National Aeronautics and Space Administration Wallops Flight Facility Wallops Island, VA 23337-5099 _______________________________________________________________________________________ For Release: November 5, 2007 Rebecca Powell/Elizabeth Flowers NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Va. (Phone: 757-824-1139/1584) Erica Rule/Jana Goldman NOAA, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Fla. (Phone: 305-361-4541/301-734-1123)) RELEASE NO: 07 - 09 NASA AND NOAA FLEW UNMANNED AIRCRAFT INTO HURRICANE NOEL NASA and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) opened a new chapter in the world of hurricane observation in making the first unmanned flight into Hurricane Noel. An unmanned aerial system, or UAS, flew into the eye wall of the hurricane at altitudes as low as 300 feet. Using the small, remotely piloted aircraft, scientists were able to make detailed observations of areas of hurricanes that are too dangerous for manned aircraft closing an important gap in obtaining real-time near-surface meteorological and oceanographic data. “NASA is pleased to partner with NOAA in achieving this long-time goal of boundary layer observations into an active hurricane.” said Randy Albertson, deputy manager of the Suborbital Science Program for the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters, Washington. “The Aerosonde Hurricane Boundary Layer Mission, combined with data from recent NASA and NOAA field missions using conventional aircraft and satellites, will provide a valuable new set of observations for air-sea interaction and tropical cyclone research.” The UAS was launched from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Va., at 2:08 p.m.(EDT), Friday, November 2. Detailed observations of the near-surface hurricane environment have been elusive because of the severe safety risks associated with low level manned flight missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Caricom and Security Governance: Probing the Limits Of
    CARICOM AND SECURITY GOVERNANCE: PROBING THE LIMITS OF REGIONAL COOPERATION BY JESSICA BYRON Abstract Regional integration in the Caribbean has always had an implicit security dimension. It has been driven by small state perceptions of their political and economic vulnerability vis-à-vis the external environment and the need for collective responses. Since 1973, a number of institutions have evolved to provide responses in the form of regular consultations and declaratory diplomacy, harmonized approaches to national security, dispute settlement and conflict management initiatives, often undertaken in collaboration with other multilateral organizations like the Organization of American States (OAS). Nonetheless, from the Grenadian Revolution (1979 – 1983) to the Haitian Crisis of 2006, CARICOM has struggled to reach consensus positions, undertake effective joint action and maintain its credibility in the face of certain regional security issues. This paper will draw on Kirchner’s conceptual framework of security governance to discuss and assess CARICOM’s role in this area of regional cooperation. Introduction This paper examines the concept of security governance and discusses its applicability to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). It explores whether CARICOM fits the profile of a “security provider”, given the very different geopolitical circumstances of the Caribbean region and the capabilities of the organization itself compared with those of the European Union. Specifically, this comparison is made in the context of Emil Kirchner’s suggestion that the EU’s form of security governance may offer a model that can be transferred to other regions (Kirchner, 2006). The paper begins by discussing the concept of governance in a security context and matching this notion against our understanding of the origins, structure and functions of CARICOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Caricom Crime and Security Strategy 2013
    CARICOM CRIME AND SECURITY STRATEGY 2013 SECURING THE REGION ADOPTED AT THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTER-SESSIONAL MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF HEADS OF GOVERNMENT OF CARICOM, 18-19 FEBRUARY 2013, PORT-AU-PRINCE, REPUBLIC OF HAITI 0 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACHCPS Association of Caribbean Heads of Corrections and Prisons Services ACIS Advance Cargo Information System APIS Advance Passenger Information System APSO Association of Private Security Organisations AROs Asset Recovery Offices ATT Arms Trade Treaty CAFIS CARICOM Automated Fingerprint Integrated System CARIBSEC CARICOM Integrated Border Security System CARIBSIS CARICOM Border Surveillance System CARICAD Caribbean Centre for Development Administration CARICOM Caribbean Community CARIPASS CARICOM Travel Card CASA CARICOM Secure App CAWT CARICOM Arrest Warrant Treaty CBSI Caribbean Basin Security Initiative CCSS CARICOM Crime and Security Strategy CDEMA Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency CIBIN Canadian Integrated Ballistics Identification Network CIP Critical Infrastructure Protection CONSLE Council of Ministers Responsible for National Security and Law Enforcement CSME CARICOM Single Market and Economy DNA Deoxyribonucleic Euro-IBIS European Integrated Ballistics Identification System FATF Financial Action Task Force JOC Joint Operational Centres JRCC Joint Regional Communications Centre MINUSTAH UN Stabilisation Mission in Haiti MDG Millennium Development Goal NIBIN United States National Integrated Ballistics Identification Network NPCs National Points of Contact RIBIN Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean
    NATURAL DISASTERS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 2000 - 2019 1 Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is the second most disaster-prone region in the world 152 million affected by 1,205 disasters (2000-2019)* Floods are the most common disaster in the region. Brazil ranks among the 15 548 On 12 occasions since 2000, floods in the region have caused more than FLOODS S1 in total damages. An average of 17 23 C 5 (2000-2019). The 2017 hurricane season is the thir ecord in terms of number of disasters and countries affected as well as the magnitude of damage. 330 In 2019, Hurricane Dorian became the str A on STORMS record to directly impact a landmass. 25 per cent of earthquakes magnitude 8.0 or higher hav S America Since 2000, there have been 20 -70 thquakes 75 in the region The 2010 Haiti earthquake ranks among the top 10 EARTHQUAKES earthquak ory. Drought is the disaster which affects the highest number of people in the region. Crop yield reductions of 50-75 per cent in central and eastern Guatemala, southern Honduras, eastern El Salvador and parts of Nicaragua. 74 In these countries (known as the Dry Corridor), 8 10 in the DROUGHTS communities most affected by drought resort to crisis coping mechanisms. 66 50 38 24 EXTREME VOLCANIC LANDSLIDES TEMPERATURE EVENTS WILDFIRES * All data on number of occurrences of natural disasters, people affected, injuries and total damages are from CRED ME-DAT, unless otherwise specified. 2 Cyclical Nature of Disasters Although many hazards are cyclical in nature, the hazards most likely to trigger a major humanitarian response in the region are sudden onset hazards such as earthquakes, hurricanes and flash floods.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Noel 4
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Noel 4-6 November 2001 James L. Franklin National Hurricane Center 14 November 2001 Hurricane Noel was a short-lived hurricane of subtropical origin. a. Synoptic History Noel developed from a non-tropical occluded low that gradually lost its frontal structure. The first appearance of the frontal low in surface synoptic maps was at 0000 UTC 2 November, when a 1002-mb low was analyzed near 32°N, 42°W. The low deepened and occluded while it moved slowly west-northwestward over the next 48 h. The official “best track” of Noel begins at 0000 UTC 4 November when the system, then 775 n mi south of Cape Race, Newfoundland, was being classified as a subtropical cyclone by both the Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch (TAFB) and the Satellite Analysis Branch (SAB). The best track chart of the tropical cyclone’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The best track positions and intensities are listed in Table 1. The subtropical cyclone drifted northward initially, its speed increasing to about 10 kt by late on 4 November. Convection, which had been limited to the northern semicircle, became more symmetric as it formed a ring around the center with a radius of about 60 n mi. The system developed a weak mid-level warm core early on 5 November, strengthened and became a hurricane with 65 kt winds at 1200 UTC that day, about 535 n mi south-southeast of Cape Race. By 0000 UTC 6 November, westerly wind shear began to displace and limit convection near the center, and Noel weakened to a tropical storm.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Annex 2. SUMMARY of PLEDGES and SUPPORT -TROPICAL STORM ERIKA
    Resilience Way, Lower Estate, St. Michael Tel: (246) 434‐4880 Fax: (246) 271‐3660 Email: [email protected] Visit our website: www.cdema.org Annex 2. SUMMARY OF PLEDGES AND SUPPORT ‐TROPICAL STORM ERIKA ‐ AS OF AUGUST 31, 2015 Regional Institutions The Regional Security System: The Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica has requested support from the Regional Security System (RSS) for the provision of fifty (50) police and military to support on the ground relief operations. In addition, sea assets to support relief operations to affected coastal communities on the east of the island have also been requested. o CDEMA's Regional Coordination Centre has coordinated the deployment of operational and other technical personnel. o Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) was formally contacted by the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth Dominica to access the Emergency Relief Grant. This grant of US$200,000 is to be administered through CDEMA. CDB is in discussion with the Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica on other medium term assistance. o CARICOM Development Fund has stated that a US$20,000 grant is available for support and could be mobilised based on needs identified. o Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH) in response to a request from the Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica deployed meteorological equipment and two technical personnel to facilitate the re‐ operationalisation of both airports. o Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA) has offered its support in the areas of environmental health, epidemiology, surveillance, vector control, and laboratory services. Participating States: 8 Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, St.
    [Show full text]
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Declaration I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. I agree with the placing of this thesis in the library of the Faculty of Education at the Masaryk University and with the access for academic purposes. Brno, 30th March 2018 …………………………………………. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. for his kind help and constant guidance throughout my work. Bc. Lukáš Opavský OPAVSKÝ, Lukáš. Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis; Diploma Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, English Language and Literature Department, 2018. XX p. Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Annotation The purpose of this thesis is an analysis of a corpus comprising of opening sentences of articles collected from the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia. Four different quality categories from Wikipedia were chosen, from the total amount of eight, to ensure gathering of a representative sample, for each category there are fifty sentences, the total amount of the sentences altogether is, therefore, two hundred. The sentences will be analysed according to the Firabsian theory of functional sentence perspective in order to discriminate differences both between the quality categories and also within the categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 the Caribbean
    SPECIAL SECTION C hapter 8: Special Section The Caribbean 81 DEFENCE THE CARIBBEANAND SECURITY Creation of Defence and Security Forces 1750-1800 1801-1850 1851-1900 1901-1950 1951 onwards 1792 Trinidad and Tobago 1832 Jamaica Constabulary 1853 Royal Grenada Police 1940 Dominica Police Force. 1960 Royal Saint Kitts and Police Force Service. Force. Force. Nevis Police Force. 1834 Royal Saint Lucia Police 1896 Royal Saint Kitts and 1962 Jamaica Defence Force. (1) Force. Nevis Defence Force . 1962 Trinidad and Tobago Defence Force. 1835 Royal Barbados Police Force. 1965 Guyana Defence Force. 1839 Guyana Police Force. 1967 Royal Antigua and Barbuda Police Force. 11840840 Royaly Bahamas Police 1973 Belize Police Department. Forceorce.. 1975 National Army of Suriname(2). West Indies Regiment 1978 Belize Defence Force. Created in 1795, the West India Regiment was an innfantry unit of the BBritish Army recruiteedd and generally stationed in the Britit sh colonies of the Caribbbean. Thehe Regiment ddiffered from similar forcces 1979 Royal Saint Vincent and recruited in other parts of the British Empire in that itt formed an integral part of the regular Britiish The Grenadines Police Army. As countries became independent, they started ccreating their own deefence forces, whichh weere Force. no longer part of the West Indies Regiment. 1979 Barbados Defence Force. 1980 Royal Bahamas Defence (1) Initiallyy, a defence force was created as a result of a strike that security forces were unable to control. The regular forcce was Force. created in 1967 . 1981 Royal Antigua and (2) In 1975, the Republic of Suriname, became independent from the Netherlands and established its own national armed forces Surinaamse Krijgsmachi.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on 2007 HURRICANE SEASON to the ANNUAL DMS MEETING Kingstown, St
    REPORT ON 2007 HURRICANE SEASON TO THE ANNUAL DMS MEETING Kingstown, St. Vincent – November 2007-11-28 Introduction Coming out of the phenomenally active Hurricane Season of 2005 and the anti-climax of unfulfilled forecasts for the ensuing 2006, the Jamaican public entered the 2007 Hurricane Season with some degree of trepidation. Based on prediction from the U.S> National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other meteorological researchers, activity for the Hurricane Season was expected to be near 150% of normal, in terms of the number of tropical cyclones forecast to develop. Dean Twenty-three (23) Bulletins were issued by the Meteorological Service on Hurricane Dean as it traced a path through the Caribbean threatening life in Jamaica. Ironically, the first was issued on August 17, exactly 56 years since the island was devastated by Hurricane Charlie. Dean was then a Category 2 hurricane, about 1500 kilometres east- southeast of Jamaica, and its centre was being forecast to move over or very close to the islands in about 48 hours. At the time, the Service also ordered the evacuation of its cays and banks, the source of livelihood of hundreds of fisher folk. With Dean consistently gaining strength and maintaining its course towards the country, a Hurricane Watch was issued later that evening and was upgraded to a hurricane Warning before midday on August 18. At that time, the Meteorological Service advised small craft operators to remain in safe harbour, and residents were warned that the system had the potential to produce flash flooding, landslides, hurricane-force winds and storm surges.
    [Show full text]