GM 55399 EXPLORATION REPORT, COULONGE RIVER PROPERTY EXPLORATION REPORT COULONGE RIVER PROPERTY PREPARED FOR BRYSON BURKE RESOURCES INC. NNE 1 TO DECEMBER 31,1994

MRN - GÉOINFORMATION 1997 GM 55399

Ron N. Little P.Eng. Consulting Engineer July 31,1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SUMMARY 2 2. INTRODUCTION 4 3. LOCATION AND ACCESS 4 3.1 PROPERTY LOCATION 4 3.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 4 3.3 ACCESS CLIMATE AND TERRAIN 6 4. EXPLORATION HISTORY 6 4.1 GENERAL 6 4.2 GEOPHYSICS 7 5. GEOLOGY 7 5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 7 5.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY 9 6. SUMMER / FALL 1994 EXPLORATION PROGRAM 9 6.1 OVERBURDEN SAMPLING 9 6.2 GROUND MAGNETICS 10 6.3 MAPPING 11 6.4 DIAMOND DRILLING 11 7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 12 8. DETAILED EXPENDITURES 14 8.1 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES 15 9. REFERENCES 17

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I GROUND MAGNETIC TARGETS 18 APPENDIX H TILL SAMPLES 21 APPENDIX III INVOICES OF EXPENDITURES 28

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1. PROPERTY LOCATION MAP 5 FIGURE 2. REGIONAL GEOLOGY 8 2

1. SUMMARY

The Coulonge River Property of Bryson Burke Resources Inc.. (referred to as BBR from here on) is located 75 km west of Maniwaki, Québec in Pontiac County. The property hosts a discovery of micro-diamonds found in the sediments of the Coulonge River as well as in some of the local streams in the Bryson Lake area. Glacial fluvial tills overlay the Grenville basement rocks or mainly granitic to mafic rich gneisses. The property is less than 200 km southeast of the Guigues kimberlite discovery.

The property is comprised of 4686 mining claims in 29 separate non-contiguous claim blocks with a total area of over 76,000 hectares.

Bryson-Burke Exploration Ltd.(BBE) carried out a regional grassroots exploration program during the period of June 1,1994 to December 31, 1995. The first phase consisted of completing orientation overburden trenches in the vicinity of the discovery of microdiamonds found in the sediments of the Coulonge River. With some understanding of the local till cover, comprised mainly of glacial/fluvial boulder outwash till overlying the Grenville Basement, a regional till sampling program was launched under the direction of Mousseau Tremblay and Ron Little. The till sampling program was to delineate any possible trains of kimberlite indicator minerals. Already there were possible targets outlined by ancient airborne geophysics with ground follow-up on 53 of the better targets. Any results from the till program were to assist in the prioritization for diamond drilling of these targets.

This approach to delineation of targets dictates that the samples be taken at greater distances from the perceived targets in a down-ice direction. For this reason many of the samples were not actually on the staked claims although a reference can be found for each claim in the appendix for each sample. For this reason, the total expenditures for this program include the costs for all samples including those that were taken south of the respective claims.

A total of 248 till samples which typically weighed 40 kg were processed to a concentrate using hand jigging and an INEX jig in the field. The concentrates were further reduced to a heavy concentrate using heavy liquids with a density of 3.33 g/ml. All samples were given a brief microscopic inspection and almost half were given a very detailed inspection including the microprobing of several grains. All results indicate that there were no true kimberlitic indicator minerals found in any of these inspections. Plans for more detailed till sampling were put on hold. - 4

2. INTRODUCTION

This report briefly describes the summer and fall 1994 exploration program and its results on the Coulonge River Property with respect to the work performed as per an Exploration grant given to Bryson Burke Resources Inc. in 1994. No follow-up exploration program is proposed in this report.

3. LOCATION AND ACCESS

3.1 PROPERTY LOCATION

The property is located in Pontiac County in the Lac Bryson Area of western . It is made up of 29 claim blocks lying between 46 and 47 north latitude and 7630' and 7730' west longitude (see Figure 1).

The nearest town is Deep River, Ontario, on the Ontario-Quebec border, about 55 km southwest of the sampling sites. The small village of Otter Lake is located 66 km southeast of the property.

3.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Ron Little has not independently verified title to any of the claims. The description of the claims has been derived from information provide by BBR. The property is owned 100 % by BBR.

The property consists of 29 claim blocks comprising unpatented mining claims which cover approximately 76,000 hectares. The claims were staked by BBR from January 1993 to February 1994. The majority of the property is located within a Main Block which extends for about 35 km along the Coulonge River. The claim blocks are shown on the compilation map in the appendix. The list of claims can be found in the appendices of reports filed previously this year. BBR \\_ PROPERTY AREA

Figure 1. Property location map. 6

3.3 ACCESS CLIMATE AND TERRAIN

Access to the property is gained from the south, through the Zone Environmental Controlee (Z.E.C.) Pontiac. The southern boundary of the property can be reached from Ottawa in about three hours. The best route into the property is though Renfrew on Highway 17 West and across the . After crossing the river, Highway 301 North leads into the village of Otter Lake where the Picanoc Road is taken north, eventually turning into a moderately maintained logging road, that leads to the south end of the Z.E.C.

Permission is necessary to use the logging roads in the Z.E.C. that access the property. From the control gate, a dirt logging road is followed north until a logging camp is reached on the east side of the river. A bridge spans the river at this point below a bend in the river known as the "Big D". The main sampling sites are in this area and to the north of the bridge. Access to most of the property is gained by the logging road. Many smaller hunting roads and trails allow good access to the rest of the property as well as the lakes and rivers.

The area is roughly 350 m above sea level consisting of numerous rolling hills, abundant lakes and active drainage systems. The hills with an average relief of 75 m exhibit open deciduous to often dense boreal forests. Steep hills, tight bush and swampy areas are common and can create slow working conditions.

4. EXPLORATION HISTORY

4.1 GENERAL

The area was not known to have been explored for diamonds until Bryson-Burke Resources discovered indicator minerals in panned concentrates around Lac Bryson in 1992. Regional radiometric, gravity and aeromagnetic data from the Geophysics Division of the GSC were used in conjunction with aerial photography to define targets for claim staking.

This area has been previously explored for base metals such as copper, zinc and nickel. There has been some interest in gold and silver and there are several current operations producing industrial minerals such as marble, mica and quartz.

The historical geological maps are at to large of a scale to be of much use. 7

4.2 GEOPHYSICS

The airborne magnetic survey with resultant total field and vertical components as calculated and published in false colour by the GSC were useful in identifying positive circular anomalies that are as large in diameter as the line spacing (800 m or greater). Smaller anomalies appear only if a the flight line passed exactly over the target.

Despite its limited application, the survey was useful for recognizing regional structures and faults. In an attempt to gain additional information, the magnetic data was processed by BBE to enhance potentially significant anomalies. Having first been reduced-to-pole, a high pass filter was applied to enhance the smaller/tighter elliptical anomalies, that may indicate kimberlite pipes, from the larger anomalous lows generated by the gneissic host rock. Euler deconvolutions were computed, and all vertical pipe-like structures were filtered out as potential targets to be compared with other data information.

5. GEOLOGY

5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The property lies within the Saint Patrice Lake area and is underlain by Precambrian rocks of the Grenville Group. These rocks consist of quartz-feldspar gneisses, amphibolites, hornblende gneisses, biotite gneisses, garnet gneisses and metasedimentary formations with a characteristic marble member.

The quartz-feldspar gneisses occur in association with all the gneisses in the area and make up a large region around Lynch Lake, where they form the core of an antiform structure that plunges southeast. Biotite gneisses are the most common, and in places contain abundant hypersthene, characteristic of charnockitic affinities (usually indicating a granulite facies terrain). Garnet gneisses are found in the biotite and hornblende gneiss terrains and serve as marker beds to outline the antiform structure. Marble is found mainly in close proximity to the Coulonge River.

Two types (and ages) of intrusions into the Grenville Group exist in the region, namely Precambrian pre- and post-tectonic intrusions. The pre-tectonic intrusions are of gabbroic, pyroxenitic or basaltic composition. These make up an insignificant portion of the rocks exposed in the area, but merit attention. The post-tectonic intrusions consist of small massive granite and syenite bodies, pegmatites and aplites. Younger diabase dykes and associated gabbro bodies are also found throughout the region (Katz 1976). Microfilm

PAGE DE DIMENSION HORS STANDARD

MICROFILMÉE SUR 35 MM ET

POSITIONNÉE À LA SUITE DES

PRÉSENTES PAGES STANDARDS

Numérki ue

PAGE DE DIMENSION HORS STANDARD

NUMÉRISÉE ET POSITIONNÉE À LA

SUITE DES PRÉSENTES PAGES STANDARDS 9

In the surrounding area, Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of Ordovician age are mostly exposed along islands in the Ottawa River to the south of the property. These rocks are predominantly dolomites, marbles, shales and sandstones.

Perhaps the most significant item of geological interest is the situation of the property on the boundary zone between the Grenville Front and the Temiscaming Sub-Province. It is a zone charaterised by a zone of deformation and igneous intrusions, which suggested thrust faulting (Dresser and Denis 1994). As part of this zone the Rift structure is linked to potential and known kimberlite intrusions on a trend from Kirkland Lake, Ontario to Ithaca in New York State.

5.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The property is known from the Deep River Sheet 31K, at 1:250,000 scale (Avramtchev and Lebel Drolet 1979) and remains poorly mapped in great detail by BBR. The claim blocks are underlain by the Precambrian Grenville Group of gneisses and metasediments, cut by faults. These faults received special attention in BBR's analysis of the geology prior to staking and during the till sampling program.

The property is underlain predominantly by biotite-rich gneiss, however, outcrops of garnet-, hornblende-, quartz-feldspar- and amphibole-rich gneiss are known to exist. Metasediments are know to include various mica-rich marbles. Locally there are occurrences of diabase and gabbroic dykes. The data set did not include any locations of ultramafics, however, several outcrops exist along the Jim's Lake road to the west boundary of the property. The ultramafics were not sampled for diamonds.

The schistosity observed in the gneisses exhibits a predominant NW-SE direction with local variations. Structures such as folding, faulting and schistosity are indicative of more than one phase of deformation. This is common in the Grenville. Local faults and foliation exhibit striking controls over drainage.

6. SUMMER / FALL 1994 EXPLORATION PROGRAM

6.1 OVERBURDEN SAMPLING

In June of 1994 Mousseau Tremblay visited the property with the field crew in order to study the morphology of the tills and thereby outline an overburden sampling technique. He commented that the overburden did led itself to sampling techniques similar to those used by Monopros Ltd. It was suggested to sample both the upper fluvial/glacial boulder layer as well as the lower basal tills. Each horizon can be useful for delineating heavy 10 mineral trends in reference to their distances from source. Even the basal unit exhibits a high rounded boulder component that certainly has resulted from some fluvial action. There was very little compacted basil till.

The roads and trails offer great sample sites with cuts into the overburden revealing complete cross-sections of the horizons. The basal tills are generally concentrated in the higher topographic regions and similarly the fluvial/glacial boulder layers are in the low relief areas.

Samples average 40 kg in size and are processed at the base camp using screens and panning. By hand a reasonable heavy mineral concentrate can be achieved especially in the fluvial/glacial material. The basal tills required further jigging which was performed at the lab in Ottawa using an INEX jig. The concentrates were processed through a heavy liquid with a specific gravity of 3.33 g/cc before they are picked under a microscope. The picking and the microprobing of the heavy mineral concentrates were performed by labs in Ottawa and Montreal.

To date 75 samples were picked in detail at Geon Laboratories in Montreal. These samples did not exhibit and classic kimberlite indicator minerals. Of interest low chromium diopsides were found to be fairly common but not significant in origin. Most interesting garnets inevitably were almandine and grossular. Admittedly, the ilmenites, chromites and spinels where not intensely observed or probed due to the lack of more classic indicators.

All of the 248 samples were screened, jigged by hand and further concentrated using the mechanical INEX jig to a heavy mineral concentrate. Only 59 of the samples did not pass through the heavy liquid. The majority of the samples did receive some visual picking and inspection during processing. Certainly the most obvious grains were continually inspected and commonly probed. None of these grains were of kimberlitic origin.

All of the sample sites are marked on the sample location maps, and their coordinates are summarized in Appendix II. ,.ï~Y"v. 7311.-0, ~ I

6.2 GROUND MAGNETICS

During the winter of 1994 53 targets were ground walked with a cut or flagged grid. These targets were included in the previous filed report which also includes all of the profiles for these targets in the appendices. During the summer program one target was redone and two others in the vicinity of Bryson Lake were walked using mostly flagged grid and cut where the bush was very difficult to pass. 11

The majority of the profiles indicate very high spiked profiles with values well over 1000 gammas. It has been concluded that the high magnetite content of the mafic -rich gneisses is responsible for most of these signatures. As a result the focus for the 1994 filed program was to hope that the till sampling program would reveal a sound technique that assist in the delineation of the many magnetic targets. Of course this was not the case.

The three targets walked in the summer program are also included in the previous report and thereby the profiles are not included in this report. Appendix I included a summary of all of the targets according to their priority and the enclosed map exhibits all of these targets. Only the costs for these three targets were included as part of the requirements for this report.

6.3 MAPPING

In the vicinity of each overburden sample and each magnetic target the area was mapped at 1:20,000 scale. It was no surprise that over 95% of the outcrops were gneisses or granitized metasediments. Several mafic dykes were noted in the vicinity of Five Mile Bay of Lac Bryson as well as marble units in close proximity to the Coulonge River. Unfortunately, all of the mapping remains in rough form at the offices of Bryson Burke Explorations Ltd and were not available to be included in this report.

Numerous glacial striations were also noted during mapping which exhibit a strong north- south trend of movement. The striations range in azimuth from 146 to 195 degrees.

6.4 DIAMOND DRILLING

One drill hole was drilled into the "Big D" in April 1994. This area is the bend in the Coulonge River just south of Lac Bryson. The log for the hole is also included in the previously filed report. Penetrating the basement rocks of the river bed, the core exhibits magnetic mafic-rich gneisses with intercalated marble units. A line of gravity was performed over this target which indicated a very classic low signature typical of a kimberlite. However the low was found to be related to an abundance of well sorted sands and gravel overlying the basement rocks. The cost of this hole were not included as part of this report for the grant. 12

7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on the review of the information one can conclude the following.

• The property is located on the eastern edge of the Ottawa Valley rift zone.

• Strong structural breaks are characteristic of the rift zone and perhaps those found on the property may be of enough significance to allow for the movement of deep seated intrusives. Certainly the proximity to the rift is of interest as related to the occurrence of kimberlite in the Kirkland Lake, Le Tac, Montreal, and Ithaca, New York areas. However, the lack of conclusive

• No Kimberlite or lamproites are known to be present on the property, nor were any related indicator minerals found in the till samples taken by BBE in 1994. Not all of the 248 samples were completely processed by BBE or other labs, however, some evidence should have been revealed in those processed if the area was containing a classical Kimberlite pipe of interest.

• The source of the microdiamonds in the Coulonge River remains a mystery. A qualification report was performed by Watts Griffis McQuat which confirmed the presence of the microdiamonds in the river was revoked on March 1, 1995 due to the with holding of results from a survey carried out by Monopros Ltd. in 1993. Monopros could not conclude a reason for the existence of microdiamonds nor did they obtain any microdiamonds in their samples. For this reason they withdrew any interest in the property. Monopros did obtain what they referred to as low to moderate interest indicators minerals in some of their samples.

• The area reveals great complexities for diamond exploration. Firstly, Due to the many folding events in the area, gneissic units tend to be lens shaped, as part of synformal and antiformal structures. This morphology leads to a sea of circular to elliptical positive and negative magnetic anomalies. Secondly, the overburden has been reworked by glacial fluvial action. This coupled with the low amount of kimberlitic indicator minerals in the overburden allows one to conclude that further till sampling is uneconomical and not a practical means of prioritizing the many magnetic targets. Certainly a large airborne multifrequency survey would be interesting, however, it obvious that there would be too many look-alike targets generated from such a survey. With out a confident means of prioritizing the targets such a costly survey would be a waste.

• Mapping remains insufficient and has been overlooked as one of the best tools for the delineation of targets. It should be the focus of any new exploration program. Certainly in lieu of recent discoveries the area should be considered for possible ultramafic units. Could it be possible to have floating ultramafic units that are deep seated slices of diamond host rocks that have been pushed to surface as a 13

result of the Grenville Orogeny. For this to be a possible source rock for the microdiamonds, it would go against many of the theories for pressures and temperatures of both the Orogeny and those related to the stability of diamonds to survive such an event. Perhaps to explain the unusual one has to consider the unusual.

• The majority of samples containing microdiamonds and indicator minerals were found during the early exploration efforts of BBE in 1993. The samples were processed in Russia and many of the results contained discrepancies between the sample numbers and the total indicator minerals in the results. The author cannot put much confidence into the data that was generated during this period. The author recommends another qualification of results in the area. CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION

This is to certify that:

I reside at 34 King George Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

I am a graduate of Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario in 1985 with a B. Sc. Eng. in Geological Engineering.

I am practicing and a registered member of the Professional Engineering Association of Ontario since 1994.

I am a member of the Canadian Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada.

This report is based on my professional experience, on a study of the available data and on my personal observations and notes while acting as the Exploration Manager for Bryson Burke Explorations Inc. for the same period as the report in 1994.

I was a Director of Bryson Burke Resources Inc. from September 1994 to February 1995. However, I did not hold nor do I hold any direct interest in Bryson Burke Resources Inc. nor in Bryson Burke Explorations Ltd. I remain as a creditor to both companies for outstanding salaries and expenses incurred during this exploration program. I do expect to be paid for my services for the completion of this report, however, I expect to be treated equally with respect to all other creditors, as an employee of Bryson Burke Resources Inc. for my debts outstanding.

This report is with out prejudice and I testify that the content of this report is true and is to the best of my knowledge. Furthermore I hereby give my consent to the use of my name for the report.

Signed in Ottawa on this 31 st day of July, 1995

Ronald N. Little, P.Eng.. 17

9. REFERENCES

Avramtchev, L. and Lebel-Drolet S. 1979 Deep River Sheet 31K, Gouvernement du Québec, M-314 Ministère de l'Énergie des Ressources du Québec.

Avramtchev, L. and Lebel-Drolet S. 1981 Cartes des gîtes miéraaux du Québec, région de 1'Abitibi. DPV-744 Ministère de l'Énergie des Ressources du Québec.

Dresser, J.A.and Denis, T.C. 1944. Geology of Québec, Volume II: Descriptive Geology. Geological Report 20, Department of Mines , Province of Québec.

Katz, M.B. 1976 Géologie des régions du lac Saint-Patrice et de Portage-du-Fort. Carte 1693. RP 578, Ministère des Richesses naturelles du Quebec. Relevés Géophysique inc. 1979. Interprétation des données aéromagnétiques dans la partie sud du Québec, DP 709, Ministère des Richesses naturelles du Québec. 18

APPENDIX I

GROUND MAGNETIC TARGETS Mag. data

UTM Priority Main daim Ajacent daims Block NTS 303 495 A 5110 975 5110 974 6-1 31k6 555715 A 5116360 5116354 10-14 31k10 739 372 A 5110 034 7-10 31k7 346 753 A 5122 803 5122 802 / 5122 805 / 5122 804 GRD 31k11 563 378 A 5107 239 5107 250 7-1 31k7 560 371 A 5107 202 7-1 31k7 541 409 A 5107 126 5107 127 7-1 31k7 522 387 A 5107 181 7-1 31k7 540 397 A 5107 683 5107 878 7-1 31k7 546 392 A 5107 676 5107 679 7-1 31k7 522 353 B 5107 772 5108 308 / 5109 854 / 5108 307 7-1 31k7 753 358 B 5110 076 5110 069 7-10 31k7 659 739 B 5112 169 5112 171 10-2 31k10 615 700 B 5108 394 5108 403 10-3 31k10 549 719 B 5116 352 10-14 31k10 502 624 B 5008 524 5008 523 10-12 31k10 458 621 B 5109 937 5109 936 7-1 31k11 454 443 B 5031 685 5031 684 6-2 31k6 287 497 B 5110 941 5110 940 6-1 31 k6 312 259 B 5031 737 5031 740 6-6 31k6 312 486 B 5110 982 5110 983 6-1 31 k6 442 621 C 5109 932 7-1 31k11 428 523 C 5116 499 5116 500 / 5116 492 / 5116 491 7-1 31k11 405 670 C 5109 959 5109 958 11-10 31k11 353 613 C 5112 868 5112 869 7-1 31k11 119 341 C 5108 329 5108 330 6-5 31k6 260 665 C 5008 565 5008 562 / 5008 564 GRD 31k11 286 695 C 5118 165 5118 166 GRD 31 k11 290 583 C 5112 772 5112 773 11-3 31k11 308 699 C 5112 705 5112 704 GRD 31k11 322 748 C 5122 815 5122 814 GRD 31 k11 336 735 C 5008 436 5122 821 GRD 31 k11 338 493 C 5118 270 5118 269 6-1 31 k6 342 622 C 5112 833 5112 836 7-1 31k11 400 535 C 5110 267 5116 467 7-1 31k11 495 336 C 5031 625 7-1 31 k7 560 365 C 5107 209 7-1 31k7 540 397 C 5107 683 5107 678 7-1 31k7 546 392 C 5107 676 5107 679 7-1 31k7 546 393 C 5107 676 5107 679 7-1 31k7 423 528 C 5116 480 5116 490 7-1 31k11 438 438 C 5031 652 5031 653 6-2 31k6 424 443 C 5031 643 5031 642 6-2 31k6 449 532 C 5107 529 5107 530 7-1 31k11 483 450 C 5113 584 5113 585 7-1 31k7 551 725 C 5116 347 5116 346 10-14 31k10 555 709 C 5116 369 5116 365 / 5116 364 10-14 31k10 555 730 C 5116 539 5116 338 10-14 31k10 600 760 C 5122 664 5112665/5112661/5112660 10-9 31k10 607 740 C 5122 654 10-9 31k10 652 740 C 5112 167 5112 168 10-2 31k10 691424 C 5110 438 5110 448 10-1 31k10 731 747 C 5112 153 5112152/5112159/5112158 10-1 31k10 704 643 C 5108 500 5108 501 / 5108 508 / 5108 509 10-4 31k11 334 735 C 5122 814 5122 815 GRD 31k7 773 345 C 5110 001 5109 991 7-10 31k7 783 521 C 5112 274 5112 275 10-5 31k10 786519 C 5112282 5112281/5112275/5112276 10-5 31k10 19

APPENDIX II

TILL SAMPLES OVERBURDEN 3000 SUMMARY SHEET

Sample # UTM (E/N) NTS Description Claim Number Block Inex M.I. 1-2mm .5-1 mm .25-.5mm 4.25mm Probe 3000 A 536 395 31 k7 Grab 5107159 7-1 Y Y 3000 B 454 514 31 k6 Grab 5117 069 7-1 Y Y 3000 C 451 495 31 k6 Rxs 5117 076 7-1 Y Y 3000 D 455 401 31 k6 Till 5031 670 6-3 Y Y C C C S 3000 E 665 330 31 k7 G.F. 5110 803 7-11 Y Y C C C S 3000 F 649 332 31 k7 G.F. sand 5110 744 7-1 Y Y C C C S 3000 G 626 335 31 k7 G.F. sand 5110 760 7-1 Y Y C C C S 3000 H 599 330 31 k7 G.F. 5110113 7-1 Y Y C C C S 30001 582325 31 k7 G.F. sand 5110123 7-1 Y Y C C C S 3000 J 524 443 31 k7 Till 5107 110 7-1 Y Y C C C S 3000 L 461 462 31 k7 G.F. 5117 082 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3000 M 448 468 31 k7 G.F. sand 5117 069 7-1 Y Y G G G 3000 N 426 548 31 k7 G.F. 5116 449 7-1 Y Y S 3000 O 425 532 31 k7 G.F. sand 5116 473 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3000 P 457 512 31 k11 G.F. 5109 358 7-1 Y Y S 3000 Q 477 593 31 k7 G.F. sand 5109 333 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3000 R 491 574 31 k7 G.F. sand 5109 311 7-1 Y Y S 3000 S 501 558 31 k7 G.F. sand 5109 286 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3000 T 512 543 31 k7 G.F. sand 5109 276 7-1 Y Y 3000 U 532 513 31 K7 G.F. 5109 655 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3000 V 539 655 31 k10 G.F. 5116 387 10-14 Y Y G G G S P.J. 3000 W 556 614 31 k7 Weathered Rxs 5110 931 10-7 Y Y G G G S 3000 X 566 583 31 ki 0 G.F. 5008 551 10-13 Y Y G G G 3000 Y 577 571 31 k10 G.F. sand 5008 552 10-13 Y Y S 3000 Z 595 517 31 k10 G.F. sand 5008 398 10-6 Y Y 3001 A 434 478 31 k7 G.F. 5117 069 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3001 B 575 481 31 k7 G.F. 5097 699 7-3 Y Y G G G S 3001 C 589 462 31 k7 G.F. sand 5031 824 7-3 Y Y G G G S 3001 D 740 364 31 k7 G.F. sand 5110 054 7-10 Y Y G G G S 3001 E 736 356 31 k7 G.F. sand 5110 073 7-10 Y Y G G G S 3001 F 329 746 31 k11 G.F 5008 571 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 G 312 716 31 ki 1 G.F. 5118104 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 H 309 709 31 k11 Grab 5118111 GRD 3001 I 309 709 31 k11 Grab 5118 109 GRD 3001 J 299698 31 k11 G.F. 5118147 GRD Y Y S 3001 K 283 688 31 k11 G.F 5122 692 GRD Y Y S 3001 L 283 688 31 k11 float 5118 169 GRD 3001 M 278 686 31 k11 G.F. 5122 691' GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 N 278 686 31 k11 G.F. 5118 168 GRD Y Y S 3001 0 337 730 31 k11 G.F. 5008 435 GRD Y Y S 3001 P 321 726 31 k11 G.F. sand 5118 090 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 Q 324 704 31101 G.F. 5118117 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 R 258 678 31 k11 G.F. 5112 690 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 S 259 659 31 k11 G.F. 5008 563 GRD Y Y S 3001 T 264 652 31 k11 Basal Till 5008 558 GRD Y Y S 3001 U 285 650 31 k11 G.F. 5122 766 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 V 270 654 31 k11 G.F. 5008 555 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 W 281 650 31 k11 G.F. 5008 553 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 X 303 654 31 k11 B.T. 5122 767 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 Y 307 654 31 k11 B.T. 5122 721 GRD Y Y G G G S 3001 Z 324 657 31 k11 B.T. 5122 748 GRD Y Y G G G S 3002 A 374 603 31 k7 Reworked 5122 884 7-1 Y Y G G G 3002B 362 602 31 k7 G.F. 5122 876 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 C 353 593 31 k7 G.F. 5122 878 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 0 346 599 31 k11 G.F. 5122 846 11-4 Y Y S 3002 E 336 606 31 106 G.F. 5122 840 7-1 Y Y S 3002 F 336 616 31 k7 G.F. 5122 839 7-1 Y Y S 3002 G 332 617 31 k7 G.F. 5122 838 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 H 324 558 31 k11 G.F. 5122 794 11-4 Y Y S 30021 315 561 31 k11 G.F. 5122 903 11-4 Y Y G G G S 3002 J 336 502 31 k6 G.F. 5118 267 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 K 320 496 31 k6 Reworked 5110 957 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 L 314 495 31 k6 B.T. 5110 971 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 N 295 448 31 k6 G.F. 5118 229 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 0 294 470 31 k8 G.F. sand 5118 230 6-1 Y Y S 3002 P 296 469 31 k6 G.F. 5118 231 6-1 Y Y S 30020 299 467 31k6 B.T. 5118 232 6-1 Y Y S 3002 R 314 457 31 k6 B.T. 5118 236 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 S 311 460 31 k6 B.T. 5118 235 6-1 Y Y G G G S P.J. 3002 T 311 472 31 k6 B.T. 5118 234 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 U 301 459 31 k6 G.F. 5118 231 6-1 Y Y S 3002 V 305 455 31 k6 G.F. 5118 233 6-1 Y Y S 3002 W 286 458 31 k6 G.F. 5118 229 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 X 574 307 31 k6 Reworked 5110167 7-1 Y Y G G G S 3002 Y 291 576 31 k11 G.F. 5122 775 11-3 Y Y S 3002 Z 264 565 31 k11 B.T. 5118 201 11-2 Y Y S 3003 A 268 561 31 k11 G.F. 5118 201 11-2 Y Y S 3003 B 251 577 31 k11 G.F. 5118 180 11-2 Y Y G G G S 3003 C 232 590 31 k11 G.F. 5118 580 11-2 Y Y G G G S 3003 D 237 618 31 k11 G.F. 5008 564 GRD Y Y S 3003 E 516 272 31 k7 G.F. 5109 800 7-1 Y Y S 3003 F 478 265 31 k7 G.F. 5109 803 7-1 Y Y S 3003 G 456 260 31 k6 G.F. 5031 656 6-3 Y Y S 3003 H 439 275 31 k6 G.F. 5031 657 6-3 Y Y G G G S 30031 435 280 31 k6 B.T. 5031 657 6-2 Y Y S 3003J 427 289 31 k6 G.F. 5031 656 6-3 Y Y S 3003 K 416 307 31 k6 G.F. 5031 640 6-4 Y Y S 30031 407 326 31 k6 B.T. 5013 641 6-4 Y Y S 3003 M 387 335 31 k6 Reworked 5118 275 6-2 Y Y G G G S 3003 N 368 338 31 k6 G.F. 5118 274 6-1 Y Y S 3003 0 358 353 31 k6 G.F. 5118 274 6-1 Y Y S 3003 P 336 357 31 k6 Reworked 5118 239 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3003 Q 318 370 31 k6 Reworked 5118 236 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3003 R 315 376 31 k6 Reworked 5118 235 6-1 Y Y S 3003S 139 537 31 k11 G.F. 5111 053 11-1 Y Y S 3003 T 151 541 31 k11 G.F. 5111 052 11-1 Y Y S 3003 U 162 544 31 k11 G.F. 5111 051 11-1 Y Y S 3003 V 174 551 31k11 G.F. 5111 049 11-1 Y Y S 3003 W 204 596 31k11 G.F. 5111 010 11-1 Y Y S 3003 X 312 497 31 k6 Stream 5110 972 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3003 Y 313 497 31 k6 Stream 5110 971 6-1 Y Y G G G S 3004 583 311 31 k7 beach con. 5110 212 7-1 Y Y 3005 652 240 31 k7 B.T. 5116 524 7-13 Y Y G G G S 3006 662 248 31 k7 G.F. 5116 326 7-13 Y Y 3007 683 257 31 k7 G.F. 5110 800 7-11 Y Y G G G 4000 414 568 31 k11 B.T. 5116 240 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4001 398 570 31 k11 B.T. 5108 665 7-1 Y Y S 4002 389 564 31 k11 G.F. 5109 668 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4003 386 561 31 Id 1 TIN 5109 671 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4004 387 548 31 k11 G.F. 5110 247 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4005 380 538 31 k11 G.F. 5110 245 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4006 372 538 31 k11 G.F. 5110 244 7-1 Y Y G G G S 4007 369 526 31 k11 B.T. 5110 901 7-1 Y Y S 4008 361 520 31 k11 G.F. 5110 891 7-1 Y Y S 4009 346 508 31 k6 G.F. 364 508 6-1 Y Y S OVERBURDEN SAMPLING SUMMARY 1904

Sample #1 UTM (E/N) NTS DMcripiion Claim Number Block Inox M.1. 1-2mm .5-1 mm .25-.5mm <.25mm Probe

TR1 485 405 31 k7 fluvial / glacial 5107 385 7-1 Y Y C C C C TR2 477 398 31 k7 basal / fluvial 5110 203 7-1 Y Y C C C C TR3 540 385 31 k7 glacial fkmial,3m depth 5107 673 7-1 Y Y C C C C 4010 344 752 31 k11 abeam sample 5122 809 GARDE Y Y S 4011 341 749 31 k11 reworked till 5122 812 GARDE Y Y S 4012 346 753 31 k11 fkrviaUglacial 5122 805 GARDE Y Y S 4013 349 759 31 k11 fluvial/glacial 5122 803 GARDE Y Y S 4014 350 764 31 k11 fluvial/glacial 5122 783 GARDE Y Y S 4015 364 761 31 k11 fluvial/glacial 5122 784 11-0 Y Y S 4016 381 754 31 kit scrape /basal 5122 785 11-8 Y Y S 4017 396 753 31 k11 scrapelbasal 5122 780 11-8 Y Y S 4018 407 776 31 k11 scrape/basal 5112 215 15-1 Y Y S 4019 415 790 31 k11 fluvial/glacial 5112 216 15-1 Y Y S 4020 433 793 31 k14 scrape/till 5112 213 15-1 Y Y S 4021 450 790 31 k11 scrape/tiM 5112 212 15-1 Y Y S 4022 461 797 31k 14 scrapeRiW 5112 211 15-1 Y Y S 4023 479 796 31 k15 scrape/till 5112 217 15-1 Y Y G G G S 4024 495 786 31 k10 scrape/basal 5112 218 15-1 Y Y S 4025 511 783 31 k10 scrape/fluvial 5112 210 15-1 Y Y S 4026 527 781 31 k10 scape/fluvial 5112 209 15-1 Y Y S 4027 534 771 31 k10 till basal 5122 679 15-1 Y Y S 4028 546 756 31 k10 fluviaUglacial 5122 679 10-8 Y Y S 4029 563 749 31 k10 thin till fluvial comp 5122 680 10-8 Y Y S 4030 573 747 31 k10 basal till 5122 681 10-8 Y Y S 4031 585 737 31 k10 basal till 5122 670 1049 Y Y S 4032 592 732 31 k10 scape/fluvial 5112 669 10-9 Y Y S 4033 601 738 31 k10 scape/fluvial 5112 654 10-9 Y Y S 4034 601 739 31 kt 0 fluvial 5112 647 10-9 Y Y S 4035 609 733 31 k10 fluvial 5112 652 10-9 Y Y S 4036 826 665 31 k10 scrape/fluvial 5112 165 10-1 Y Y S 4037 808 665 31 k10 fluvial 5112165 10-1 Y Y S 4038 786 666 31k10 basal 5112 156 10-1 Y Y S 4039 765 675 31 k10 fluvial 5112157 10-1 Y Y S 4040 690 760 31 k10 fluvial 5112 163 10-1 Y Y S 4041 753 704 31 k10 fluvial 5112158 10-1 Y Y S 4042 736 713 31 k10 fluvial 5112162 10-1 Y Y S 4043 730 720 31k1 0 fluvial 5112 159 10-1 Y Y S 4044 720 728 31k10 basal 5112 161 10-1 Y Y S 4045 707 734 31 k10 fluvial 5112160 15-2 Y Y S 4046 681 741 31 k10 basal 5112170 15-2 Y Y S 4047 673 749 31 k10 fluvial 5112 169 15-2 Y Y S 4048 654 748 31 k10 fluvial 5112168 15-2 Y Y S 4049 645 744 31 MO scrape/fluvial 5112166 15-2 Y Y S 4050 635 728 31 k10 scrape/fluvial 5112 175 15-2 Y Y S 4051 618 731 31 k10 scrape/basal 5112 650 10-9 Y Y S 4052 338 753 31 k11 fluvial 5122 817 GARDE Y Y S 4053 343 748 31 k11 fluvial 5122 810 GARDE Y Y S 4054 481 796 31 k15 basal/fluvial 5112 215 15-1 Y Y G G G S 4055 500 008 31 k2 fluvial 5031 585 2-3 Y Y S 4056 503 025 31 k2 fluvial 5031 561 2-3 Y Y S 4057 467 053 31 k2 ablation 5031 715 3-2 Y Y S 4058 463 093 31 k2 fluvial 5031 716 3-2 Y Y S 4059 754 494 31 k7 fluvial ? 5112 284 10-5 Y Y S 4060 746 489 31 k7 fluvial ? 5112 283 10-5 Y Y S 4061 724 487 31 k7 basal 5112 545 7-4 Y Y S 4062 645 467 31 k7 off esker 5112 558 7-4 Y Y S 4063 644 463 31 k7 reworked till - basal 5112135 7-6 Y Y S 4064 655 472 31 k7 ablatioin 5112126 7-6 Y Y S 4065 679 475 31 k7 basal / ablation 5112125 7-4 Y Y S 4066 775 506 31 k7 basal 5112 287 10-5 Y Y G G G S 4067 712 572 31 k10 basal 5112 188 10-4 Y Y S 4068 728 581 31 k10 basal / ablation 5112190 10-4 Y Y S 4069 761 567 31 k10 ablation 5112192 10-4 Y Y S 4070 746 577 31 k10 ablation 5112 191 10-4 Y Y S 4071 681 619 31 k10 ablation 5108 580 10-4 Y Y S 4072 704 604 31 k10 basal 5109 549 10-4 Y Y S 4073 727 604 31k10 basal 5112 189 10-4 Y Y S 4074 715 639 31 k10 basal 5108 531 10-4 Y Y S 4075 731 614 31k10 basal 5112185 10-4 Y Y S 4076 838 572 31 k10 basal / ablation comp. 5112194 Y Y S 4077 840 555 31 k10 fluvial 5112193 Y Y S 4078 777 555 31 k10 ablation 5112192 10-5 Y Y S 4079 800 547 31 k10 ablation 5112192 10-5 Y Y S 4080 815 546 31 k10 basal 5112 193 10-5 Y Y S 4081 847 541 31 k10 ablation w/ basal comp. Y Y S 4082 867 538 31 k9 basal Y Y S 4083 897 515 31 k9 outwash w/ basal Y Y S 4084 924 514 31 k9 ablation Y Y S 4085 863 517 31 k9 fluvial Y Y S 4086 844 513 31 k10 ablation Y Y S 4087 820 504 31 k10 ablation 5112 278 10-5 Y Y S 4088 799 507 31 k10 ablation 5112279 10-5 Y Y G G G S 4089 788 509 31 k10 ablation 5112 286 10-5 Y Y G G G S 4090 784 507 31 k7 basal 5112 286 10-5 Y Y G G G S 4100 315 493 31 k6 recent stream 5110 980 6-1 Y 4101 316 493 31 k6 stream 5110 980 6-1 Y 4102 319 491 31 k6 stream 5110 958 6-1 Y 4103 306 483 31 k6 ablation 5110 968 6-1 Y 4104 315 463 31 k6 basal 5118 235 6-1 Y 4105 325 467 31 k6 basal 5118 237 6-1 Y 4106 336 471 31 k6 ablation 5118 274 6-1 Y 4107 312 477 31 k6 basal 5118 234 6-1 Y 4108 309 474 31 k6 basaal 5118 233 6-1 Y 4109 314 477 31 k6 basal 5118 234 6-1 Y 4110 321 476 31 k6 basal 5118 236 6-1 Y 4111 329 481 31 k6 basal / reworked 5118 215 6-1 Y 4112 336 482 31 k6 basal / oxidized 5118 272 6-1 Y 4113 310 480 31 k6 basal 5118 220 6-1 Y 4114 341 494 31 k6 ablation 5118 279 6-1 Y 4115 333 502 31 k6 basal / reworked 5110 953 6-1 Y 4116 324 488 31 k6 stream 5110 964 6-1 Y 4117 320 490 31 k6 stream 5110 965 6-1 Y 4118 320 491 31 k6 eskerene / fluvial 5110 965 6-1 Y 4119 320 491 31 k6 stream 5110 958 6-1 Y 4120 325 495 31 k6 ablation 5110 156 6-1 Y 4121 305 495 31 k6 pionjar sample 5110 974 6-1 Y 4122 305 493 31 k6 pionjar sample 5110 974 6-1 Y 4123 305 490 31 k6 pionjar sample 5110 977 6-1 Y 4124 316 495 31 k6 ablation / basal 5110 971 6-1 Y 4125 306 487 31 k6 basal 5110 983 6-1 Y 4126 503 457 31 k7 ablation 4097 588 7-1 Y 4127 499 454 31 k7 ablation / basal 4097 587 7-1 Y 4128 497 447 31 k7 basal 5113 589 7-1 Y 4129 495 441 31 k7 basal 5113 600 7-1 Y 4130 494 440 31 k7 stream 5110 354 7-1 Y 4131 505 440 31 k7 ablation 5107 086 7-1 Y 4132 504 433 31 k7 ablation 5107 087 7-1 Y 4133 513 433 31 k7 basal / ablation 5107 089 7-1 Y 4134 515 434 31 k7 ablation 5107 099 7-1 Y 4135 486 404 31 k7 ablation 5107 382 7-1 Y 4136 493 407 31 k7 ablation 5107 377 7-1 Y 4137 497 394 31 k7 stream sad. 5107 373 7-1 Y 4138 496 394 31 k7 stream 5107 374 7-1 Y 4139 495 392 31 k7 basal 5110 212 7-1 Y 4140 491 387 31 k7 basal 5110 219 7-1 Y 4141 505 381 31 k7 basal 5104 893 7-1 Y 4142 500 406 31 k7 ablation 5107 074 7-1 Y 4143 525 384 31 k7 stream 5107 173 7-1 Y 4144 522 382 31 k7 stream 5107 464 7-1 Y 4145 520 379 31 k7 basal 5107 465 7-1 Y 4146 549 380 31 k7 ablation 5107 196 7-1 Y 4147 544 380 31 k7 ablation / basal 5107 194 7-1 Y 4148 530 383 31 k7 till? 5107 172 7-1 Y 4149 564 375 31 k7 fluvial 5107 251 7-1 Y 4151 563 351 31 k7 coarse sands 5107 454 7-1 Y 4152 563 351 31 k7 coarse sands 5107 458 7-1 Y 4153 563 351 31 k7 coarse sans high distrib 5107 458 7-1 Y 4154 563 351 31 k7 coarse sands 5107 455 7-1 Y 4155 563 351 31 k7 flat placer 5107 455 7-1 Y 4156 563 351 31 k7 reworked basal 5107 456 7-1 Y 4157 561 385 31 k7 basal 5107 241 7-1 Y 4158 564 381 31 k7 stream 5107 249 7-1 Y T-1 484 404 31 k7 fluvial 5107 381 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-2 500 398 31 k7 fluvial 5107 373 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-3 500 396 31 k7 fluvial 5107 370 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-4 507 395 31 k7 fluvial 5107 364 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-5 514 391 31 k7 fluvial 5107 183 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-6 558 364 31 k7 fluvial 5107 210 7-1 Y Y C C C C T-7 522 392 31 k7 fluvial 5107 180 7-1 Y Y C C C C

Ministère dds ressources naturelles MRN - GÉOINFORMATION 1997 GM 55399

Programme « Prospection et exploration minière »

de l'Entente auxiliaire Canada-Québec

RE U Volet 3B 1 6 JAN. 1998

Rapport d'exploration

Pour : I3 Y 50A) % 00. Kc. E sO Ukcv ~ S /A»

Projet : Cau cr 1-1 .r vEr.?

9/ 3B- /6)1

SN RC : 3 I It

Canton : ANVaO ~'~~ 4 S c~>

Date : b~ ~