Bulmer Hobson and the Nationalist Movement in Twentieth-Century Ireland by Marnie Hay Review By: Fergal Mccluskey Source: Irish Historical Studies, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bulmer Hobson and the Nationalist Movement in Twentieth-Century Ireland by Marnie Hay Review By: Fergal Mccluskey Source: Irish Historical Studies, Vol Review Reviewed Work(s): Bulmer Hobson and the nationalist movement in twentieth-century Ireland by Marnie Hay Review by: Fergal McCluskey Source: Irish Historical Studies, Vol. 37, No. 145 (May 2010), pp. 158-159 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20750083 Accessed: 31-12-2019 18:31 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Irish Historical Studies This content downloaded from 82.31.34.218 on Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:31:59 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 158 Irish Historical Studies BULMER HOBSON AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY IRELAND. By Mamie Hay. Pp 272, illus. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 2009. ?55 hardback; ?18.99 paperback. Bulmer Hobson's formative influence in numerous political and cultural organisations begs the question as to why, until now, his autobiographical Ireland: yesterday and tomorrow (1968) remained the only consequential account of his career. Dr Hay expresses little surprise, however, at this historiographical gap. In fact, Hobson's position as 'worsted in the political game' (p. 1) serves as this book's premise. Quaker origins aside, Hobson typified early twentieth-century Ulster's emerging republican avant-garde, sharing the petit-bourgeois background, Gaelic revivalism and boundless energy of his three main contemporaries, Denis McCullough, Sean Mac Diarmada and Patrick McCartan. Dr Hay's valuable political biography enriches the established narrative of prominence in the early Sinn Fein movement, Irish Republican Brotherhood (I.R.B.). takeover and involvement in the Irish Volunteers, and the events of the Easter Rising, while Hobson's early life and later years in the political wilderness also receive scholarly attention. The book opens with a rich account of Hobson's adolescence in Belfast, detailing the eclectic influences that formed his cultural and revolutionary mindset. This leads onto an interesting assessment of Hobson's early cultural activism, although whether repackaging and popularising the ideas of others should be regarded as 'genius' is debatable (p. 38). Similarly, just because Hobson claimed Keynes's general theory represented an affirmation of his plans to reforest an Ghaeltacht does not make it so (p. 224). The author employs a commendable breadth of sources, notably in chapters detailing Hobson's involvement in the Dungannon Clubs and Sinn Fein. However, this reader found the lack of a wider context frustrating here; for instance, who 'attacked and mobbed' (p. 51) early Dungannon Club meetings in west Belfast? Why does Joseph Devlin not intrude on the narrative until spring 1913 (p. 128)? Coverage of the early Sinn Fein period includes noteworthy analysis of Arthur Griffith's personal antipathy to Hobson. Yet, arguably, the Clan choice of Hobson over Griffith to tour America in 1907 relied more on the northerner's republicanism and Protestantism than the force of his oratory (p. 67). The author also gives an impressive treatment of Hobson's involvement in the I.R.B, coup when the 'younger generation ... trounced the old guard' (p. 101). The most important section of the book embodies a protracted narrative of the Irish Volunteer movement, Hobson's central role in its direction (before and after the co-option of Redmond's nominees), through to his attempts to subvert the Easter Rising (including a very entertaining segment on his kidnapping prior to the rebellion). The concluding chapters are largely successful in explaining Hobson's position as 'leader manque' of the Sinn Fein revolution (p. 207) and his later attempts to justify his past record. Hay relies on the later accounts of McCullough, McCartan and Hobson himself, but often leaves all three men's retrospective desire to recast their role in the Rising to the reader's intuition. This raises a wider point regarding critical distance between author and subject. A central argument is that, early on, Hobson synthesised the ideas of Fintan Lalor and Wolfe Tone into a programme for 'moral insurrection' (p. 18). This constituted the ideological bedrock for his subsequent actions, by extension justifying opposition to the Rising and support for guerrilla tactics on the grounds that it 'not only adhered to the constitutions of both the Irish Volunteers and the I.R.B., but was designed to maximise the chance of military success' (p. 177). The author supports this analysis through refer ence to Hobson's autobiography and interviews given to the B.B.C. and R.T.E., all dating from the 1960s (pp 188, 243-5). Similarly, the claim that Hobson avoided a split by nobly accepting his expulsion/resignation from the I.R.B, supreme council in July 1914 allows Hobson options contemporaneous evidence suggests he did not have (p. 138). On 25 June Tom Clarke informed John Devoy of the intention to expel Hobson (Clarke to Devoy, 25 June 1914 (N.L.I., MS 31696)). Devoy's subsequent treatment of Hobson only confirmed this (p. 140). This content downloaded from 82.31.34.218 on Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:31:59 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Reviews and short notices 159 As indicated in the book's title, the author adheres to the label 'nationalist', with a central question being 'Why and how did Bulmer Hobson become a leader of the Irish nationalist movement prior to 1916?' (p. 4). Hobson and his cohorts were and viewed themselves pri marily as republicans. John Redmond's Irish Party represented the 'nationalist movement' until after the Rising, by which time Hobson had disappeared from political life. The author argues that Hobson's eclipse robbed the Sinn Fein movement of a great talent (p. 207), and that his subsequent obscurity signified 'the conscious forgetting of individuals who do not fit the dominant historical paradigm' (p. 4). This view underplays the fact, acknowledged by Hay, that Hobson was the only leading Fenian who actively opposed the Rising. Moreover, having avoided arrest he could not point to atonement through incarceration, unlike Eoin MacNeill, Griffith and many others - none of whom had Hobson's knowledge of I.R.B, plans by January 1916 (p. 183). Dr Hay's biography rightly pays tribute and adds signifi cantly to our understanding of Hobson's role in the genesis of the Irish revolution, whilst recognising that her book represents 'only one' of a variety of interpretations (p. 252). Fergal McCluskey Department of History, National University of Ireland, Galway Belfast boys: how unionists and nationalists fought and died together in the First World War. By Richard S. Grayson. Pp 272. London: Continuum. 2009. ?25. The thoughts, attitudes and reactions of ordinary British soldiers to the Great War have received a good deal of attention over the last thirty years or so. Denis Winter's Death's men (1978) provided a neat overview, despite a handful of strange, and occasionally downright dubious, assertions. Others have worked on more specific aspects. Peter Simkins did an excellent job on those who joined up in the great volunteering rush of 1914 in Kitcheners army (1988), while Gary Sheffield concentrated on the relationship between leaders and led in Leadership in the trenches (2000), and Tony Ash worth explored the complex attitudes towards violence in Trench warfare, 1914-1918 (1980). Alongside these works ranging over large numbers of units are those that focus on specific regiments, battalions or men from certain districts. Amateur military historians have made a significant impact in this particular field, having devoted much time and energy to uncovering information stashed in local librar ies, records offices and regimental museums. Particular attention has been lavished on the so-called 'pals battalions', those units formed by men from certain districts or occupations who joined up together in the autumn of 1914; examples of these works abound, including volumes on the Barnsley, Birmingham, Carmarthen, Durham, Hull, Leeds, Manchester and Swansea Pals, to name but a few. However, it is only comparatively recently that British university-based academics have begun to recognise the importance of closely researched local and regional studies of units in order to test and nuance the wider historiography. The phenomenon is much further advanced in other parts of the anglophone world, particularly Australia, where works such as Dale Blair's Dinkum diggers: an Australian battalion at war (2001) provide an excellent model for similar studies. At the same time, local studies have become a staple part of investigations into post-war memorialisation, commemorative practices and rituals. Peter Donaldson's Ritual and remembrance: the memorialisation of the Great War in east Kent (2006) and Nuala Johnson's Ireland, the Great War and the geography of remembrance (2003) are two excellent examples of this approach. In terms of the fusion between military and social history, Ireland has already been well served. Keith Jeffery's Ireland and the Great War (2000) provided a comprehensive overview, and Timothy Bowman's Irish regiments in the Great War: discipline and morale (2003) has focused on the impact of war on Irish units. Into this field comes Richard Grayson's highly readable book exploring the experiences of west-Belfast men. Much very fine detective work has been lavished on the volume, as Grayson has pored over many This content downloaded from 82.31.34.218 on Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:31:59 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms.
Recommended publications
  • A Seed Is Sown 1884-1900 (1) Before the GAA from the Earliest Times, The
    A Seed is Sown 1884-1900 (1) Before the GAA From the earliest times, the people of Ireland, as of other countries throughout the known world, played ball games'. Games played with a ball and stick can be traced back to pre-Christian times in Greece, Egypt and other countries. In Irish legend, there is a reference to a hurling game as early as the second century B.C., while the Brehon laws of the preChristian era contained a number of provisions relating to hurling. In the Tales of the Red Branch, which cover the period around the time of the birth of Christ, one of the best-known stories is that of the young Setanta, who on his way from his home in Cooley in County Louth to the palace of his uncle, King Conor Mac Nessa, at Eamhain Macha in Armagh, practised with a bronze hurley and a silver ball. On arrival at the palace, he joined the one hundred and fifty boys of noble blood who were being trained there and outhurled them all single-handed. He got his name, Cuchulainn, when he killed the great hound of Culann, which guarded the palace, by driving his hurling ball through the hound's open mouth. From the time of Cuchulainn right up to the end of the eighteenth century hurling flourished throughout the country in spite of attempts made through the Statutes of Kilkenny (1367), the Statute of Galway (1527) and the Sunday Observance Act (1695) to suppress it. Particularly in Munster and some counties of Leinster, it remained strong in the first half of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • National University of Ireland Maynooth the ANCIENT ORDER
    National University of Ireland Maynooth THE ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS IN COUNTY MONAGHAN WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PARISH OF AGHABOG FROM 1900 TO 1933 by SEAMUS McPHILLIPS IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF M.A. DEPARTMENT OF MODERN HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH HEAD OF DEPARTMENT: Professor R. V. Comerford Supervisor of Research: Dr. J. Hill July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgement--------------------------------------------------------------------- iv Abbreviations---------------------------------------------------------------------------- vi Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Chapter I The A.O.H. and the U.I.L. 1900 - 0 7 ------------------------------------43 Chapter II Death and destruction as home rule is denied 1908 - 21-------------81 Chapter III The A.O.H. in County Monaghan after partition 1922- 33 -------120 Conclusion-------------------------------------------------------------------------------143 ii FIGURES Figure 1 Lewis’s Map of 1837 showing Aghabog’s location in relation to County Monaghan------------------------------------------ 12 Figure 2 P. J. Duffy’s map of Aghabog parish showing the 68 townlands--------------------------------------------------13 Figure 3 P. J. Duffy’s map of the civil parishes of Clogher showing Aghabog in relation to the surrounding parishes-----------14 TABLES Table 1 Population and houses of Aghabog 1841 to 1911-------------------- 19 Illustrations------------------------------------------------------------------------------152
    [Show full text]
  • THE BELFAST GAZETTE, 23Rd DECEMBER, 1955
    388 THE BELFAST GAZETTE, 23rd DECEMBER, 1955. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN demands of which particulars shall have been given NORTHERN IRELAND as above required. QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION—IN BANKRUPTCY Dated this 20th day of December, 1955. J. D. DEVLIN, Solicitor for said Adminis- Thomas Adger and Frank Adger, trading as Adger trator, Cookstown. Bros, of West Drive, Portstewart, Co. London- derry, Builders, were on the 9th day of December, 1955, adjudged Bankrupts. STATUTORY NOTICE TO CREDITORS PUBLIC SITTINGS will be held before the In the Estate of James Austin, late of 15 Grand Court at the Royal Courts of Justice (Ulster), Parade, Belfast, Builder, deceased. Belfast, on Friday, the 13th day of January, 1956, NOTICE is hereby given, pursuant to the Statute and on Friday, the 20th day of January, 1956, at 22 and 23 Vic. Cap. 35, that all persons having the hour of Eleven o'clock in the forenoon, whereat any claims or demands against the Estate of the the Bankrupts are to attend, and to make a full above deceased, who died on the 24th day of disclosure and discovery of their Estate and Effects. January, 1955, are hereby required to furnish par- Creditors may prove their Debs, and at the First ticulars of such claims or demands (in writing) on Sitting choose a Creditors' Assignee. At the last or before the 1st day of March, 1956, to the under- Sitting the Bankrupts are required to finish their signed, Solicitors for the Administratrix, to whom Examination. Letters of Administration were on the 18th day of All persons having in their possession any May, 1955, granted forth of the Principal Registry Property of the Banrupts should deliver it and all of the Queen's Bench Division (Probate) of the Debts due to the Bankrupts should be paid to William High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Against the Flow: Sinn Féin´S Unusual Hungarian `Roots´
    The International History Review, 2015 Vol. 37, No. 1, 41–58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2013.879913 Going Against the Flow: Sinn Fein’s Unusual Hungarian ‘Roots’ David G. Haglund* and Umut Korkut Can states as well as non-state political ‘actors’ learn from the history of cognate entities elsewhere in time and space, and if so how and when does this policy knowledge get ‘transferred’ across international borders? This article deals with this question, addressing a short-lived Hungarian ‘tutorial’ that, during the early twentieth century, certain policy elites in Ireland imagined might have great applicability to the political transformation of the Emerald Isle, in effect ushering in an era of political autonomy from the United Kingdom, and doing so via a ‘third way’ that skirted both the Scylla of parliamentary formulations aimed at securing ‘home rule’ for Ireland and the Charybdis of revolutionary violence. In the political agenda of Sinn Fein during its first decade of existence, Hungary loomed as a desirable political model for Ireland, with the party’s leading intellectual, Arthur Griffith, insisting that the means by which Hungary had achieved autonomy within the Hapsburg Empire in 1867 could also serve as the means for securing Ireland’s own autonomy in the first decades of the twentieth century. This article explores what policy initiatives Arthur Griffith thought he saw in the Hungarian experience that were worthy of being ‘transferred’ to the Irish situation. Keywords: Ireland; Hungary; Sinn Fein; home rule; Ausgleich of 1867; policy transfer; Arthur Griffith I. Introduction: the Hungarian tutorial To those who have followed the fortunes and misfortunes of Sinn Fein in recent dec- ades, it must seem the strangest of all pairings, our linking of a party associated now- adays mainly, if not exclusively, with the Northern Ireland question to a small country in the centre of Europe, Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Societies and the Easter Rising
    Dominican Scholar Senior Theses Student Scholarship 5-2016 The Power of a Secret: Secret Societies and the Easter Rising Sierra M. Harlan Dominican University of California https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2016.HIST.ST.01 Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Harlan, Sierra M., "The Power of a Secret: Secret Societies and the Easter Rising" (2016). Senior Theses. 49. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2016.HIST.ST.01 This Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POWER OF A SECRET: SECRET SOCIETIES AND THE EASTER RISING A senior thesis submitted to the History Faculty of Dominican University of California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts in History by Sierra Harlan San Rafael, California May 2016 Harlan ii © 2016 Sierra Harlan All Rights Reserved. Harlan iii Acknowledgments This paper would not have been possible without the amazing support and at times prodding of my family and friends. I specifically would like to thank my father, without him it would not have been possible for me to attend this school or accomplish this paper. He is an amazing man and an entire page could be written about the ways he has helped me, not only this year but my entire life. As a historian I am indebted to a number of librarians and researchers, first and foremost is Michael Pujals, who helped me expedite many problems and was consistently reachable to answer my questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer Women: Militarized Femininity in the 1916 Easter Rising
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons War and Society (MA) Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-20-2019 Volunteer Women: Militarized Femininity in the 1916 Easter Rising Sasha Conaway Chapman University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/war_and_society_theses Part of the Women's History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Conaway, Sasha. Volunteer Women: Militarized Femininity in the 1916 Easter Rising. 2019. Chapman University, MA Thesis. Chapman University Digital Commons, https://doi.org/10.36837/chapman.000079 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in War and Society (MA) Theses by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volunteer Women: Militarized Femininity in the 1916 Easter Rising A Thesis by Sasha Conaway Chapman University Orange, CA Wilkinson College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in War and Society May 2019 Committee in Charge Jennifer Keene, Ph.D., Chair Charissa Threat, Ph.D. John Emery, Ph. D. May 2019 Volunteer Women: Militarized Femininity in the 1916 Easter Rising Copyright © 2019 by Sasha Conaway iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my parents, Elda and Adam Conaway, for supporting me in pursuit of my master’s degree. They provided useful advice when tackling such a large project and I am forever grateful. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Roinn Cosanta
    ROINN COSANTA. BUREAU. OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21. STATEMENT BY WITNESS DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 766 Witness Dr. Patrick McCartan, Karnak, The Burnaby, Greystones, Co. Wicklow. Identity. Member of Supreme Council of I.R.B.; O/C. Tyrone Volunteers, 1916; Envoy of Dail Eireann to U.S.A. and Rudsia. Subject. (a) National events, 1900-1917; - (b) Clan na Gael, U.S.A. 1901 ; (C) I.R.B. Dublin, pre-1916. Conditions, it any, Stipulated by Witness. Nil File No. S.63 Form B.S.M.2 STATEMENT OF DR. PATRICK McCARTAN, KARNAK. GREYSTONES, CO. WICKLOW. CONTENTS. Pages details and schooldays 1 - 5 Personal Departure for U.S.A. 5 Working for my living and sontinuing studies U.S.A. 5 - 7 in Return to Ireland in 1905 8 My initiation into the Hibernians and, later, the Clan-na-Gael in the U.S.A 8 Clan-na-Gael meeting addressed by Major McBride and Maud Gonne and other Clan-na-Gael activities 9 - 11 of the "Gaelic American". 12 Launching My transfer from the Clan-na-Gael to the I.R.E. in Dublin. Introduced to P.T. Daly by letter from John Devoy. 12 - 13 Some recollections of the Dublin I.R.B. and its members 13 - 15 Circle Fist Convention of Sinn Fein, 1905. 15 - 16 Incident concerning U.I.L. Convention 1905. 17 First steps towards founding of the Fianna by Countess Markievicz 1908. 18 My election to the Dublin Corporation. First publication of "Irish Freedom". 19 Commemoration Concert - Emmet 20 21. action by I.R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Banshee's Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and The
    The Banshee’s Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and the All for Ireland League. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Patrick Joseph Murphy. August 2019 1 The Banshee’s Kiss: Conciliation, Class and Conflict in Cork and the All for Ireland League. ABSTRACT Historians have frequently portrayed constitutional nationalism as being homogeneous - ‘the Home Rule movement’- after the reunification of the Irish parliamentary party in 1900. Yet there were elements of nationalist heterodoxy all over the country, but it was only in Cork where dissent took an organised form in the only formal breakaway from the Irish party when the All for Ireland League (A.F.I.L.) was launched in 1910. The AFIL took eight of the nine parliamentary seats in Cork and gained control of local government in the city and county the following year. Existing historical accounts do not adequately explain why support for the Home Rule movement collapsed in Cork, but also why the AFIL flourished there but failed, despite the aspiration of its name, to expand beyond its regional base. The AFIL is chiefly remembered for its visionary policy of conciliation with unionists following the Damascene conversion of its leader William O’Brien, transformed from the enemy of the landed classes to an apostle of a new kind of bi- confessional politics. This would, he claimed, end the ‘Banshee’s Kiss’, a cycle of conflict in which each new generation attempts to achieve Irish freedom. However, conciliation was a policy which was unpopular with both nationalists and unionists and O’Brien therefore needed to develop an electoral base by other means with more popular policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925
    WITHOUT A "DOG'S CHANCE:" THE DEVLINITE IRISH NEWS, NORTHERN IRELAND'S "TRAPPED" NATIONALIST MINORITY, AND THE IRISH BOUNDARY QUESTION, 1921-1925 by James A. Cousins Master ofArts, Acadia University 2000 Bachelor ofArts, Acadia University 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Department ofHistory © James A. Cousins 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL Name: James A. Cousins Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title ofProject: Without a "Dog's Chance:" The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925 Examining Committee: Chair Dr. Alexander Dawson, Associate Professor Department ofHistory Dr. John Stubbs, Professor Senior Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Wil1een Keough, Assistant Professor Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Leith Davis, Professor Supervisor Department ofEnglish Dr. John Craig, Professor Internal Examiner Department ofHistory Dr. Peter Hart, Professor External Examiner Department ofHistory, Memorial University of Newfoundland Date Approved: 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • Roinn Cosanta
    ROINN COSANTA. BUREAU OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21. STATEMENT BY WITNESS. DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 1,765. Witness His Excellency, Seán T. O'Kelly, Árus an Uachtaráin, Phoenix Park, Dublin. Identity. Speaker, Dáil Éireann, 1920; Irish Representative, Paris & Rome, 1920-21; Minister for Local Government & Finance, 1932-45; President of Ireland, 1945-59. Subject. National activities, 1898-1921. Conditions, if any, Stipulated by Witness. Nil. File No S.9. Form B.S.M.2 DREACHT/4 A very considerable revival of national feeling and sentiment was caused as a result of the many meetings and demonstrations held in Dublin and in many parts of the co in celebration of the Centenary of the Insurrection of 17 Dublin, I think, was particularly affected. There were nationalist organisations established during the year 189 a year or two following, '98 Clubs became a fairly common of national political life in all parts of the City, and of the country. For a number of years after the '98 Ce demonstations took place in the counties where there had considerable activity in 1798, and monuments were erect connection with the unveiling of the monuments, demonstrd were held to which large numbers of people travelled, and these meetings speeches urging a revival of national sent and national activity of various kinds were made by peop prominently associated with the national movement. As far as I remember, all sections of the, what wo the called Gaelic movement, were associated with Centenary celebrations. The Parliamentary Party of the d took a prominent part in it, and the various sections of the deman tatiam associated but these meetings and demonstration themselves4, were utilised by a small but effective group of people who the 2.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT by MR. BULMER HOBSON on I. R. B. and IRISH FREEDOM a Copy of This Statement Was Sent. at Mr. Hobson's Request to Each
    STATEMENT BY MR. BULMER HOBSON ON I. R. B. AND IRISH FREEDOM A copy of this statement was sent. at Mr. Hobson's request to each of the following, and any comments received in the Bureau as a result are registered and filed, as. indicated hereunder: Relevant Name Rogister NO. Dr. P McCartan S.63 P.S, O'Hogarty S.49 D, McCuliough S,62 P. O'Rinin S,32 S. 0'Connor S.53 S. Fitzgihbon S.54 Captain R. Montcith S.50 PÁDRAIG PEARSE. After The formation of the Irish Volunteers in October, 1913, Pádraig Pearse was sworn in by me as a member of the I.R.B. in December of that year. I cannot recollect which Circle. The circumstances leading to this were as follows: Being in financial difficulties with his school, St. Enda's, Rathfarnham, and being afraid of bankruptcy, Pearse came to me in December 1913 with his problem. He had started his school on a promise of £500 which had never materialised. I arranged a lecture tour for him in the United States after correspondence with John Devoy, of the stare of NewYork Joe McGarrity, Judge Keogh of the Supreme Court, and, I think, John Quinn. When these arrangements were made, and in view of the fact that pearse would almost certainly have been brought in to the I.R.B. at a very early date, I swore him in before his departure for the States. Pearse went to the United States. I followed a fortnight later. Pearse was quite unaware of my intention to go there and was surprised when I turned up.
    [Show full text]
  • Easter Rising of 1916 Chairs: Abby Nicholson ’19 and Lex Keegan Jiganti ’19 Rapporteur: Samantha Davidson ’19
    Historical Crisis: Easter Rising of 1916 Chairs: Abby Nicholson ’19 and Lex Keegan Jiganti ’19 Rapporteur: Samantha Davidson ’19 CAMUN 2018: Easter Rising of 1916 Page 1 of 6 Dear Delegates, Welcome to CAMUN 2018! Our names are Abby Nicholson and Lex Keegan Jiganti and we are very excited to be chairing this committee. We are both juniors at Concord Academy and have done Model UN since our freshman year. After much debate over which topic we should discuss, we decided to run a historical crisis committee based on the Easter Rising of 1916. While not a commonly known historical event, the Easter Rising of 1916 was a significant turning point in the relations between Ireland and Great Britain. With recent issues such as Brexit and the Scottish Referendum, it is more crucial than ever to examine the effects of British imperialism and we hope that this committee will offer a lens with which to do so. The committee will start on September 5th, 1914, as this was when the Irish Republican Brotherhood first met to discuss planning an uprising before the war ended. While the outcome of the Rising is detailed in this background guide, we are intentionally beginning debate two years prior in order to encourage more creative and effective plans and solutions than what the rebels actually accomplished. This is a crisis committee, meaning that delegates will be working to pass directives and working with spontaneous events as they unfold as opposed to simply writing resolutions. We hope this background guide provides an adequate summary of the event, but we encourage further research on both the topic and each delegate’s assigned person.
    [Show full text]