DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Strategy for the Danube Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Strategy for the Danube Region EU Strategy for the Danube Region Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries for the Revision of the EUSDR Action Plan FINAL VERSION 11th July 2019 (V1) endorsed by EUSDR NCs handed over to the European Commission / DG Regio on 11th July 2019 1/103 Table of Contents PRELUDE ....................................................................................................................................... 3 PART A: Strategic and operational framework ........................................................................... 4 1. Scope of the Revision Process of the EUSDR Action Plan ...................................................... 4 1.1. EUSDR History ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. The Reasons for revising the Action Plan ............................................................................ 5 1.3. The scope of the revision ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Description of the Revision Process of the EUSDR Action Plan ............................................. 8 3. Results and recommendations from the evaluation ........................................................... 10 4. Proposals for drafting a Narrative for the Danube Region .................................................. 14 5. Strategic Objectives for increasing the Quality of Living in the Danube Region ................ 15 5.1. Spatial Trends in the Danube Region ................................................................................ 15 5.2. Acknowledgment of superior goals and objectives .......................................................... 18 5.3. Strategic Objectives of EUSDR ........................................................................................... 20 6. Priorities and Pillars, Specific Objectives and Targets ......................................................... 23 6.1. Priorities and Pillars of EUSDR ........................................................................................... 23 6.2. Specific Objectives of EUSDR: ............................................................................................ 24 6.3. Cross-cutting Issues ............................................................................................................ 26 7. EUSDR Governance ................................................................................................................ 27 7.1. Internal governance – core EUSDR actors ........................................................................ 28 7.2. External governance ........................................................................................................... 33 7.3. Cooperation with other MRS and sea-basin strategies .................................................... 35 8. Interplay of EUSDR with European funding facilities ........................................................... 35 PART B: Revised targets, actions and projects for the EUSDR ................................................... 39 PA 1A - WATERWAYS MOBILITY ................................................................................................ 40 PA 1B - RAIL-ROAD-AIR MOBILITY ............................................................................................. 44 PA 02 - SUSTAINABLE ENERGY .................................................................................................. 52 PA 03 - CULTURE & TOURISM ................................................................................................... 57 PA 04 - WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................................ 63 PA 05 - ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS ............................................................................................... 69 PA 6 – BIODIVERSITY, LANDSCAPES, AIR AND SOILS ................................................................ 75 PA 07 - KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY .................................................................................................. 82 PA 08 - COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISES ........................................................................... 87 PA 09 - PEOPLE & SKILLS ........................................................................................................... 92 PA 10 - INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & COOPERATION ............................................................... 96 PA 11 - SECURITY ....................................................................................................................... 99 ANNEX 1 ....................................................................................................................................... 102 Corrigendum V1: DE, HU and PA 6 comments received immediately after 5th July 2019 are included in V1. 2/103 Revision of the EUSDR Action Plan: Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries (5th June 2019) PRELUDE This “Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries” was elaborated by the Danube Strategy Point (DSP) in its role as process facilitator, jointly agreed and approved by the EUSDR National Coordinators and handed over to the European Commission / DG Regio, on 5th July 2019. This document compiles and contextualizes the outcomes of multifaceted consultations. As it stems from the actors directly concerned with steering and implementing the EUSDR, it constitutes the primary basis for the revised Action Plan, which is to be elaborated by the European Commission / DG Regio until autumn 2019. The document consists of two parts: Part A of this document describes the envisaged strategic and operational framework for of the revised Action Plan (scope and description of the revision process, results and recommendations of the Operational Evaluation, thematic orientation of the EUSDR, governance and interplay with funding facilities). Part B then transfers “words into action” and demonstrates envisaged future foci at Priority Area level (targets, actions, strategic projects / activities). 3/103 Revision of the EUSDR Action Plan: Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries (5th June 2019) PART A: Strategic and operational framework 1. Scope of the Revision Process of the EUSDR Action Plan 1.1. EUSDR History In 2008, the Prime Ministers of Austria and Romania introduced the idea of creating a strategy for the Danube Region in a letter to the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. The actual start of EUSDR is 19th June 2009, when the European Council requested the European Commission to prepare a European Union Strategy for the Danube Region before the end of 2010 (Scoping Paper for the public consultation 2010). On 8th December 2010, the European Commission adopted two main documents: the Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM(2010) 715), and an accompanying Action Plan (SEC(2010)1489/3), a Commission Staff Working Document which complements the Communication. The Communication (COM(2010) 715) describes the challenges and opportunities of the Danube Region, recommends an integrated approach, proposes the Action Plan (AP) (SEC(2010) 1489/3) and asks for a strong commitment from the participating countries and stakeholders. In the Communication, 4 Pillars and 12 Priority Areas (PAs) are listed. The Action Plan facilitates the transfer from ‘words to actions’ by identifying concrete actions for each of the 12 Priority Areas. On 13th April 2011, the European Council endorsed the Council Conclusions on EUSDR (3083rd GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting) thanks to the efforts of Hungary during its EU Presidency. The Action Plan states that each Priority Area allocates the coordination to a Priority Area Coordinator (PAC). The Danube Region countries established for each of the 12 Priority Areas 2 Priority Area Coordinators from different countries. A Steering Group as board consisting of representatives of the Danube Region countries accompanies each of the Priority Areas. In 2012, each Priority Area specifies actions to tasks and summarizes them to their Priority Areas’ Targets and Actions adopted by their Steering Groups. In May 2016 a new/updated set of targets per Priority Areas was validated by the National Coordinators (NCs) and Priority Area Coordinators at a joint meeting held in Bratislava (Slovakia). For enhancing the coordinative capacity, the Danube Strategy Point (DSP) was established in 2015. The DSP implemented communication tools and helped to harmonize activities and reporting of PACs. The work of DSP stopped in 2017 and was re-established and re-organized in autumn 2018 as supportive body for all actors of EUSDR. Both acting bodies, the PACs and DSP are funded by the Danube Transnational Programme (DTP), which facilitates the necessary organizational structure for EUSDR activities, thus acting in the framework of transnational projects. Another tool for enhancing cooperation, which also offers the opportunity for exchanging important thematic issues are the Annual Fora (AF), organized by the respective year’s Presidency of EUSDR. Usually the Annual Fora are a market place for ideas and important events e.g. for political conferences. 4/103 Revision of the EUSDR Action Plan: Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries (5th June 2019) 1.2. The Reasons for revising the Action Plan The EUSDR Action Plan was designed to remain stable for a certain period. However, over
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EU Strategy for the Danube Region
    EU Strategy for the Danube Region Consolidated Input Document of the Danube Countries for the Revision of the EUSDR Action Plan FINAL VERSION 5th July 2019, handed over to the European Commission / DG Regio on 5th July 2019 1/103 Table of Contents PRELUDE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 PART A: ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Scope of the Revision Process of the EUSDR Action Plan ...................................................... 4 1.1. EUSDR History ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. The Reasons for revising the Action Plan ........................................................................ 5 1.3. The scope of the revision ................................................................................................. 8 2. Description of the Revision Process of the EUSDR Action Plan ............................................. 8 3. Results and recommendations from the evaluation ........................................................... 10 4. Proposals for drafting a Narrative for the Danube Region .................................................. 14 5. Strategic Objectives for increasing the Quality of Living in the Danube Region ................ 15 5.1. Spatial Trends in the Danube Region ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Developments and Their Impact on Runoff in the Upper Tisa Catchment
    Water developments and their impact on runoff in the Upper Tisa catchment Károly Konecsny The 157 200 km2 large catchment of the River Tisa1 is situated in the eastern part of the Carpathian Basin, also known as the Central Danube Basin. The upper catchment down to the village Záhony is 32 782, that down to Tokaj 49 449 km2 large. The origin of the name Tisa is still unclear, some linguists trace it back to an Indo European root supposed to mean muddy, or silty. In Roman documents the river is mentioned under the names Parsiou, Pthirus, Tigas and Tisianus, while in the mediaeval Latin chronicles in the forms Tisia and Tysia. Keywords: hydrology, Upper Tisa, Carpathian Basin The Upper Tisa and her tributaries in the Ukraine The headwaters of the Tisa are in the Maramuresh Alpine Mountains, the name Tisa is used downstream of the confluence of the Chorna Tisa and Bila Tisa. Of her 962 km total length, the mountain section is only 200 km long. From the confluence of the Chorna Tisa and the Bila Tisa down to the mouth of the Vi§eu the average slope of the valley floor is very steep, 6.33 m/km, between the Vi§eu and the Tereblja 2.28 m/km, flattening down to Tiszabecs to less than l m/km. Over the mountain section the valley is narrow, the river having carved her up to 50 m wide bed between steep banks. The normal depth is a few decimetres. Beyond her emergence into the plains at Hust the Tisa becomes a typically lowland river meandering in a spreading valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials and Methods
    1 Phylogeography and population genetics of the European mudminnow 2 (Umbra krameri) with a time-calibrated phylogeny for the family Umbridae 3 4 Saša Marić1, David Stanković2,3, Josef Wanzenböck4, Radek Šanda5, Tibor Erős6, Péter 5 Takács6, András Specziár6, Nenad Sekulić7, Doru Bănăduc8, Marko Ćaleta9, Ilya Trombitsky10, 6 Laslo Galambos11, Sandor Sipos12, Aleš Snoj2* 7 8 1 Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11001 9 Belgrade, Serbia 10 2 Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Groblje 3, SI- 11 1230 Domžale, Slovenia 12 3 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via Licio Giorgieri 5, 34127 Trieste, Italy 13 4 Research Institute for Limnology, University of Innsbruck, Mondseestraße 9, 5310 Mondsee, 14 Austria 15 5 National Museum, Department of Zoology, Václavské náměstí 68, 115 79 Prague 1, Czech 16 Republic; 17 6 Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Klebelsberg Kuno u. 18 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary 19 7 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia 20 8 Faculty of Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Dr. Ion Raţiu 5-7, RO-550012, Sibiu, 21 Romania 22 9 Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Savska cesta 77, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 1 23 10 Eco-TIRAS International Association of Dniester River Keepers, Teatrala 11A, Chisinau 24 2012, Moldova 25 11 Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina, Radnička 20a, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 26 12 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg D. 27 Obradovića 2, Novi Sad, Serbia 28 29 30 * Corresponding author: Aleš Snoj 31 Telephone number: 00 386 1 3203 912 32 Fax number: 00 386 1 3203 888 33 E-mail: [email protected] 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Abstract 2 44 The genetic structure of European mudminnow populations throughout the species range was examined using 45 mitochondrial DNA and seven microsatellite loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Paginae Historiae
    PAGINAE HISTORIAE SBORNÍK NÁRODNÍHO ARCHIVU 23/2 PodkarpaTská RUS Redaktor svazku: Mgr. David Hubený Recenzovali: prom. hist. Ivan Šťovíček, CSc. PhDr. Bohdan Zilynskyj, Ph.D. © Národní archiv, 2015 ISSN 1211 ‑9768 OBSAH STUDIE Školství na Podkarpatské Rusi ve 20. letech 20. století .................... 7 (Julia Delibaltová) KSČ na Podkarpatské Rusi v roce 1938 ................................. 21 (David Hubený) Čeští úředníci na Podkarpatské Rusi za druhé republiky z pohledu centrální vlády v Praze .................................... 39 (David Hubený) Vlajka Podkarpatské Rusi – národní vlajka karpatských Rusínů............ 63 (Roman Klimeš) Velkostatky uherských magnátů na Podkarpatské Rusi ................... 78 (Pavel Koblasa) Politika a fungovanie Národnej rady Zakarpatskej Ukrajiny ............... 91 (Stanislav Konečný) Definitivní stanovení hranice Československa a Rumunska na Podkarpatské Rusi po roce 1918 . 110 (Jan Krlín) Rusíni v československých vojenských jednotkách ve Francii 1939–1940 .... 141 (Zdenko Maršálek) Malý pohraniční styk na Podkarpatské Rusi v letech 1919–1945 ............ 165 (Jan Rychlík) Přehled dopisovatelů Lidových novin z Podkarpatské Rusi . 179 (Daniel Řehák) Sociální demokrat Jaromír Nečas a Podkarpatská Rus .................... 185 (Michael Švec) Podkarpatská Rus a Slovensko v medzivojnovom Československu – hľadanie novej koexistencie (1918–1930) ............................. 202 (Peter Švorc) Ukrajinští emigranti na Podkarpatské Rusi a státní služba (1919–1929). Těžké hledání uplatnění na východě republiky
    [Show full text]
  • Some Biological Data on Cactus Roach, Rutilus Virgo (Heckel), in Rivers of the Transcarpathian Region of Ukraine
    Arch. Pol. Fish. (2015) 23: 67-77 DOI 10.1515/aopf-2015-0008 RESEARCH PAPER Some biological data on cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), in rivers of the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine Evgeniy Talabishka, Alexander Didenko, Igor Velykopolskiy Received – 03 March 2015/Accepted – 11 June 2015. Published online: 30 June 2015; ©Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Poland Citation: Talabishka E., Didenko A., Velykopolskiy I. 2015 – Some biological data on cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), in rivers of the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine – Arch. Pol. Fish. 23: 67-77. Abstract. The occurrence of Rutilus virgo (Heckel) has been Introduction confirmed in the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine, where it was caught in the lower stretches of the Latorica and Borzhava Species of the genus Rutilus (roach) in Ukraine are rivers. The comparison of selected morphometric features of R. rutilus and R. virgo showed that 26 of 40 of them were represented by R. rutilus (L.), R. frisii (Nordmann), significantly different and the largest differences were and the introduced R. kutum (Kamensky) (Movchan observed for features such as head length, maximum body 2011). However, the latter species is considered to be depth, pectoral fin length, pectoral fin thickness, pelvic fin a subspecies of R. frisii (Bogutskaya and Naseka length, head depth at eye level, maximum head depth, and 2004). Cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), is not preorbital length. The comparison of R. virgo of two size listed in the fish fauna of Ukraine; however, the pos- groups showed a number of changes in fish body proportions during fish growth, where 29 of 38 features were different.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Genocide in Transcarpathia
    This book is dedicated to the memory of all Hungarian men and women, victims of Stalinist tyranny in Transcarpathia. G E N O C I D E THE TRAGEDY OF THE HUNGARIANS OF TRANSCARPATHIA They were born Hunqarian: that vas their only crime! A BOOK OF RECOLLECTION OF THE VICTIMS OF STALINISM IN TRANSCARPATHIA (1944 - 1946) Edited by Dupka Gyorgy Published by PATENT - INTERMIX UNGVAR - BUDAPEST HUNGARIAN BOOKS ON TRANS-CARPATHIA Editors of the series: Dupka Gyorgy, Fejes Janos, Tirkanics Gabriella Artistic Director: Ivaskovics Jozsef The Ministry of Culture and Education supported publication of this volume. Edited and annotated by Dupka Gyorgy Cover by Jankovics Maria Copyright: Dupka Gyorgy, 1993 Published by INTERMIX EDITIONS Managing editor: Dupka Gyorgy ISBN 963 8129 08 5 Printed 1993 in Ungvar by the PATENT Printing and Publishing Company Managing Director: Kovacs Dezso Technical director: Negre Viktor # 2368 CONTENTS: FOREWORD TO THE ENGLISH EDITION RESOLUTION #036 THE TRAGEDY: BEREGSZASZ DISTRICT UPPER TISZA REGION THE DISTRICT OF MUNKACS DISTRICT OF NAGYSZOLOS DISTRICT OF UNGVAR THE LIST OF THE DEAD A P P E N D I X CHRONICLE OF EVENTS: E P I L O G U E FOREWORD TO THE ENGLISH VERSION: It seems, there was an open season on the Hungarians, behind the front lines during the last year of W.W. II, and for years afterwards: The Yugoslav partizans of Tito murdered in cold blood approximately 40,000 Hungarian boys and men (see the Cseres book on this Home Page). Eduard Benes of Czechoslovakia expelled, forcibly relocated, exchanged, and stripped of their citizenship hundreds of thousands (see the Janics book also on this Home Page).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Report Flood Issues and Climate Changes
    Flood issues and climate changes Integrated Report for Tisza River Basin Deliverable 5.1.2 May, 2018 Flood issues and climate changes - Integrated Report for Tisza River Basin Acknowledgements Lead author Daniela Rădulescu, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Sorin Rindașu, National Administration Romanian Water, Romania Daniel Kindernay, Slovak Water Management Interprise, state enterprise, Slovakia László Balatonyi dr., General Directorate of Water Management, Hungary Marina Babić Mladenović, The Jaroslav Černi Institute for the Development of Water Resources, Serbia Ratko Bajčetić, Public Water Management Company “Vode Vojvodine”, Serbia Contributing authors Andreea Cristina Gălie, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Ramona Dumitrache, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Bogdan Mirel Ion, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Ionela Florescu, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Elena Godeanu, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Elena Daniela Ghiță, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Daniela Sârbu, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Silvia Năstase, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Diana Achim, National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Romania Răzvan Bogzianu, National Administration Romanian Romanian Water Anca Gorduza, National Administration Romanian Romanian Water Zuzana Hiklová, Slovak
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DANUBE RESEARCH 39 th IAD Conference Living Danube 21-24 August, 2012 Szentendre, Hungary Book of Abstracts The Conference was organized by: Danube Research Institute Centre for Ecological Research Hungarian Academy of Sciences, General Secretary of International Association for Danube Research, supported by: Hungarian Academy of Sciences , International Association for Danube Research (IAD), Danube Research Institute Centre for Ecological Research Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Göd/Vácrátót 2012 39 th IAD Conference 2012. Szentendre, Hungary The publication was supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Editor Mária Dinka Technical assistents Gábor Horváth Éva Mészáros-Kuska Reviews were made by the Members of the Scientific Committee ISBN 978-963-8391-52-0 A kiadásért felel ős az MTA Ökológiai Kutatóközpont DKI (Dr. Berczik Árpád) A kézirat nyomdába érkezett: 2012. augusztus Megjelent: 2012. augusztus Nyomdai kivitelezés: Amulett ’98 Kft . 39 th IAD Conference 2012. Szentendre, Hungary The conference was organized under the auspices of Prof. József Pálinkás president of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Patronated by HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES , BUDAPEST INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DANUBE RESEARCH COUNCIL OF SZENTENDRE , SZENTENDRE HUNGARIAN HYDROLOGICAL SOCIETY , BUDAPEST DANUBE MUSEUM , ESZTERGOM WATERWORKS OF BUDAPEST , BUDAPEST PANNON -VÍZ LTD ., GYŐR DMRV CO., VÁC HAWLE GROUP , SZENTENDRE HUNGARIAN WATER UTILITY ASSOCIATION , BUDAPEST 39 th IAD Conference 2012. Szentendre, Hungary We would like to thank our cordially IAD 2012 committees: Organizing Committee PROF . DR ÁRPÁD BERCZIK , Hungary PROF . DR THOMAS HEIN , Austria, IAD President PROF . DR IVANA TEODOROVI Ć, Serbia, IAD Vice - President DR HARALD KUTZENBERGER , Austria, IAD General Secretary DR MÁRIA DINKA , Hungary DR KÁROLY SCHÖLL , Hungary DR ATTILA ENGLONER , Hungary DR ANITA KISS , Hungary DR EDIT ÁGOSTON -SZABÓ , Hungary Scientific Committee DR FRITZ KOHMANN , Germany DIPL .
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIES and EUROREGIONS for CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION in BALKAN and DANUBE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES an Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats
    C M C M PREPS PREPS Y K Y K N STRATEGIES AND EUROREGIONS O I T A FOR CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION IN BALKAN R E P AND DANUBE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES O The ISIG (Institute of International Sociology of Gorizia), a non-profit-making cultural insti- - O An analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, tution, was founded in 1968 and has been recognized as a legal personality since 1985. C R The statutory aims of the Institute are: to carry out studies and researches and organize E Opportunities and Threats D S conferences on the problems of the relations between states, nations, and ethnic groups R E I O R and on the cultural, economic and social development of the populations; to furnish the B T - Alberto Gasparini, Daniele Del Bianco S authorities and the competent bodies with information tending to promote the cultural, eco- N S U nomic and social development of the populations; to carry on seminars and specialization O O R C courses for graduates and scholars engaged in work on the subjects that form the object C N of the Institute’s research. The scientific and cultural activity of the Institute is at present car- R A O E F ried out in six departments, which in their turn are subdivided into research programmes, P S O publications, the organization of exhibitions and conferences, and teaching. The depart- N R O U ments are: International sociology (international relations, interethnic relations), I E G E Technology and the future, Sociology of space (territory, town, community and home, envi- E B R ronment, rural sociology), Mass emergencies, Sociosystemics, Social policies, social grou- U O N R ps and altruism.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Biological Data on Cactus Roach, Rutilus Virgo (Heckel), in Rivers of the Transcarpathian Region of Ukraine
    Arch. Pol. Fish. (2015) 23: 67-77 DOI 10.1515/aopf-2015-0008 RESEARCH PAPER Some biological data on cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), in rivers of the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine Evgeniy Talabishka, Alexander Didenko, Igor Velykopolskiy Received – 03 March 2015/Accepted – 11 June 2015. Published online: 30 June 2015; ©Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn, Poland Citation: Talabishka E., Didenko A., Velykopolskiy I. 2015 – Some biological data on cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), in rivers of the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine – Arch. Pol. Fish. 23: 67-77. Abstract. The occurrence of Rutilus virgo (Heckel) has been Introduction confirmed in the Transcarpathian region of Ukraine, where it was caught in the lower stretches of the Latorica and Borzhava Species of the genus Rutilus (roach) in Ukraine are rivers. The comparison of selected morphometric features of R. rutilus and R. virgo showed that 26 of 40 of them were represented by R. rutilus (L.), R. frisii (Nordmann), significantly different and the largest differences were and the introduced R. kutum (Kamensky) (Movchan observed for features such as head length, maximum body 2011). However, the latter species is considered to be depth, pectoral fin length, pectoral fin thickness, pelvic fin a subspecies of R. frisii (Bogutskaya and Naseka length, head depth at eye level, maximum head depth, and 2004). Cactus roach, Rutilus virgo (Heckel), is not preorbital length. The comparison of R. virgo of two size listed in the fish fauna of Ukraine; however, the pos- groups showed a number of changes in fish body proportions during fish growth, where 29 of 38 features were different.
    [Show full text]
  • GEF Danube River Basin Hydromorphology and River Restoration Project (DYNA)
    GEF Danube River Basin Hydromorphology And River Restoration project (DYNA) Component 3. Demonstration Pilots – Restoration of the Botar River Morphology and Its Hydrological Regime Environmental and Social Management Framework 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 The DYNA Project ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 The Botar River Pilot .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Objective of the ESMF ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 ESMF Preparation Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Pilot objectives ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Proposed pilot activities ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary-Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020
    European Neighbourhood Instrument Hungary-Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 As amended on 23 November 2016 JOINT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Approved by the participating countries on 25 June 2015, revised on 14 October 2015 and on 13 November 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Definition of the programme area ........................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Participating countries and the Programme area ................................................................................. 8 2.2 Core regions ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Adjoining regions ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Major social, economic or cultural centres .......................................................................................... 12 2.5 Map of the programme area ............................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Intention to make use of Article 10(5) of Regulation (EU) No
    [Show full text]