DOCSLIB.ORG

Paedophilia – the Radical Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Contents Note on using this e-book edition Preface New preface (1998) by Tom O'Carroll [NOTE: Missing from original .HTML files , so not included here] Chapter 1 The Seeds of Rebellion Chapter 2 Children's Sexuality: What Do We Mean? Chapter 3 The 'Molester' and His 'Victim' Chapter 4 Paedophilia in Action Chapter 5 Do Children NEED Sex? Chapter 6 Towards More Sensible Laws Chapter 7 The Philosophy of Children's Rights Chapter 8 'Consent' and 'Willingness' Chapter 9 Power and Equality Chapter 10 Children in Erotica and Pornography Chapter 11 The Beginnings of Radical Paedophilia in Britain Chapter 12 The Big Bang Chapter 13 A Wider Perspective Bibliography 1998: Further reading Websites of Interest Credits 1998 HTML edition 2013 .PDF e-book edition Note about using this special e-book edition Just think – if this book were e-mailed to all the politicians, lawmakers and journalists around the country (or even the world!) it would make a difference. Do you want to make a difference? Then you be the one to do it now! Paedophilia – The Radical Case by Tom O'Carroll by the Editor of this 2013 special .PDF e-book edition. For the reader's convenience, the table of contents contains “hyper-links” (links you can click) to each Chapter. Other hyper-links aid in navigation throughout the book. Each reference/footnote – indicated by a raised number in the text (i.e. 21) – now includes a hyper-link to the corresponding note. At the end of each reference/footnote is a ^ symbol, which upon “clicking”, will return the reader to the main text. (For an explanation of what op. cit. and ibid. mean, see below.) Please note also that the formatting and pagination in this e-book does not follow the original printed version. The legal situation in many countries has changed since this book was originally published. Therefore some legal information in the book may not be current. New laws tend to be harsher and more restrictive. Be sure to check local laws for current information. For those less familiar with footnotes, the following may be useful: Ibid. is an abbreviation of the Latin, ibidem, which means “in the same place”. A footnote that says ibid. just means you have to look at the footnote above it for the other information, usually the name of the book. So it is easy to know what it is about. Op. cit. comes from the Latin, opere citato, which in a footnote means “in another footnote where the book, etc. was already mentioned previously”. The problem is that the book or other work may have been mentioned in a footnote that you might not have read or may not remember. In this case, you can search backwards in the text for the name, book title, etc. mentioned in the footnote. Eventually, you will find the full reference. To return to the footnote with the op. cit. in it, you then have to search forwards (fortunately, using the same search term or terms) until you find the footnote you started from (the “search box” has an option to search forwards or backwards in the text.) Then you can click on the ^ symbol to return to where you were reading in the text. So, using op. cit.may make it fast and easy for the author while he writes his book, but it can make things difficult for the reader when he reads it. And this has been going on for hundreds and hundreds of years... By clicking the following hyper-link, you will be taken back to the Table of Contents: [Back to Contents] Or you may scroll down to continue reading the book. Preface Considering the passions the subject generates, there are surprisingly few books on paedophilia. It may be that some 'professionals' – psychiatrists, criminologists and the like – are reluctant to express too great an interest for fear of being thought prurient, or self-interested. Their contribution tends to be confined to articles in specialist journals, or the odd page or two in huge textbooks on 'abnormal' psychology. Except covertly, in novels and poems, there have been few contributions from paedophiles either, for the very good reason that being an 'out' paedophile in our society is a hazardous business. In any case the taboo against paedophilia has rendered it literally 'unspeakable' (hence 'unwriteable') except when referred to in the most denunciatory terms. I am a paedophile, and in the chapters that follow it will become apparent why I have felt it necessary to crash through the barriers of societal disapproval by speaking out. The fact that I have been able to do so owes much to the work, described in Part Three, of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a group with which I have been closely connected, which has been campaigning since its inception in 1974 for the open discussion of paedophilia, and for abolition of the laws against consensual sexual acts between children and adults. PIE's struggle has been a tough one. There have been threats, and violence, against us. Members' careers have been shattered following 'exposure' in the press, and now, thanks to charges of 'conspiracy to corrupt public morals' levelled against PIE's organisers (including myself), this struggle is about to see us into the dock at the Old Bailey. The writing of this book has been jeopardised on two occasions, in 1978 and 1979, when police raided my house, along with those of other PIE members, and seized a large quantity of research material. By the merest good fortune, the material seized on each occasion consisted largely of papers I had already studied and used in the draft of my book. Such pressures are the penalty to be paid for speaking the unspeakable. And yet it is arguable that the 'radical' case presented here is not so radical at all. There are elements of our case on which PIE and myself no longer stand alone, and cannot easily be dismissed as a libertarian 'lunatic fringe': the recent report of the National Council for One Parent Families, Pregnant at School, has called for the abolition of the age of consent, for reasons which are completely in line with those advanced in relation to sex education, contraception and pregnancy in this hook, and there are other, equally 'respectable', bodies that now support the abolition, or lowering, of the age of consent. In the Netherlands, as readers unfamiliar with developments in Europe will discover in the coming pages, even major church organisations and political parties are coming to the conclusion that the laws designed to 'protect' children from sexual experiences actually do them more harm than good. Nor is my aim 'radical' if what is meant by that term is an attempt to 'strike at the very roots of society' by undermining 'family life'. I would be the first to acknowledge that there is nothing warmer, more secure, or more valuable to a child than a stable, loving family, and I can see every reason for supporting the best in family life, not destroying it. At the same time, I see no reason to shrink from the conclusion – a 'radical' and I hope constructive one – that families which deny children their sexual life, including the possibility of sexual contact with adults, are profoundly limited, however good they may be in other respects. Such a view is not dependent upon scientifically speculative premises, Reichian or otherwise. It does not depend on the belief that sexual repression in childhood has a direct, biological impact leading to psychological and psychosomatic problems: what is much more plainly evident than this is that children learn, by being discouraged from sexual expression, that sex is 'bad' and 'dirty' – a belief that subtly dogs them all their lives. My qualifications for making what may appear to be an academic judgement on such a matter may he doubted. But this is not intended to be an academic work, pioneering scientific advances by means of original theory or controlled empirical studies. My contribution, rather, so far as academic considerations enter into it, is to present a paedophile's perspective on what is already known – an exercise aimed at the 'expert' and the open-minded layman alike. My approach has been personal, and committed, rather than spuriously 'scientific' and 'objective', but I have made every effort to use my sources honestly, at all times, and to treat opposing points of view with cool, calm deliberation, rather than impatient dismissal A publisher (not my present one) once told me that a radical book on paedophilia should be 'either a passionate tract or an icy rationale'. I believe that, paradoxically, this book is both. Inevitably, the personal nature of my approach has resulted in certain limitations. As a lover of boys, I find myself tending to write more about relationships between boys and men than other forms of paedophilic encounters, including the apparently far more numerous contacts between girls and men. I have made a determined effort, however, to write a book on 'paedophilia', rather than on 'boy-love. There are already a number of books about the latter which strike me as far too parochial. Some boy- lovers write as though girls did not exist – especially as they fail to address themselves to the all-important question of consent, which can only be fully answered by reference to the impact that adults of either sex can have on children of either sex in sexual encounters. Unfortunately, a book on general 'paedophilia' runs the risk of obscuring important psychological differences, at least so far as male paedophilia is concerned, between boy-love and girl-love – differences which have major implications, especially for feminist critiques of paedophilia, which are sometimes over-reliant on a unitary view of the male sexual psyche.
Recommended publications
  • Masturbation Practices of Males and Females

    Masturbation Practices of Males and Females

    Journal of Sex Research ISSN: 0022-4499 (Print) 1559-8519 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hjsr20 Masturbation practices of males and females Ibtihaj S. Arafat & Wayne L. Cotton To cite this article: Ibtihaj S. Arafat & Wayne L. Cotton (1974) Masturbation practices of males and females, Journal of Sex Research, 10:4, 293-307, DOI: 10.1080/00224497409550863 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224497409550863 Published online: 11 Jan 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 549 View related articles Citing articles: 44 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hjsr20 The Journal of Sex Research Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 293—307 November, 1974 Masturbation Practices of Males and Females IBTIHAJ S. ARAFAT AND WAYNE L. COTTON Abstract In this study, the authors have examined the masturbation practices of both male and female college students, attempting to test some of the premises long held that men and women differ significantly in such prac- tices. The findings indicate that while there are differences in many of the variables examined, there are others which show striking similarities. Thus, they open to question a number of assumptions held regarding differences in sexual needs and responses of males and females. Introduction The theoretical framework for this study has its basis in the early studies of Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin (1948). These first studies sought to document factually and statistically masturbation practices in this country. Though innovative, these studies have become out- dated and limited in light of contemporary developments.
  • Aphrodisiacs in the Global History of Medical Thought

    Aphrodisiacs in the Global History of Medical Thought

    Journal of Global History (2021), 16: 1, 24–43 doi:10.1017/S1740022820000108 ARTICLE Aphrodisiacs in the global history of medical thought Alison M. Downham Moore1,2,* and Rashmi Pithavadian3 1School of Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia, 2Freiburg Institute for Advanced Study, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Albertstraße 19, Freiburg im Breisgau 79100, Germany and 3School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The study of aphrodisiacs is an overlooked area of global history which this article seeks to remedy by considering how such substances were commercially traded and how medical knowledge of them was exchanged globally between 1600 and 1920. We show that the concept of ‘aphrodisiacs’ as a new nominal category of pharmacological substances came to be valued and defined in early modern Latin, English, Dutch, Swiss, and French medical sources in relation to concepts transformed from their origin in both the ancient Mediterranean world and in medieval Islamicate medicine. We then consider how the general idea of aphrodisiacs became widely discredited in mid-nineteenth-century scientific medicine until after the First World War in France and in the US, alongside their commercial proliferation in the context of new colonial trade exchanges between Europe, the US, Southeast Asia, Africa, India, and South America. In both examples, we propose that global entanglements played a significant role in both the cohesion and the discreditation of the medical category of aphrodisiacs.
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
  • AMERICAN MASCULINITIES, 1960-1989 by Brad

    AMERICAN MASCULINITIES, 1960-1989 by Brad

    “HOW TO BE A MAN” AMERICAN MASCULINITIES, 1960-1989 by Brad Congdon Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia March 2015 © Copyright by Brad Congdon, 2015 . To Krista, for everything. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................vi ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................1 1.1 “MEN” AS THE SUBJECT OF MASCULINITIES...................................5 1.2 “LEADING WITH THE CHIN”: ESQUIRE MAGAZINE AS HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY PROJECT.............................................16 1.3 CHAPTER BREAKDOWN......................................................................25 CHAPTER 2: AN AMERICAN DREAM: MAILER’S GENDER NIGHTMARE............32 2.1 CRISIS! THE ORGANIZATION MAN AND THE WHITE NEGRO....35 2.2 AN AMERICAN DREAM AND HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY ...........43 2.3 AN AMERICAN DREAM AND ESQUIRE MAGAZINE.....……….........54 2.4 CONCLUSION: REVISION AND HOMOPHOBIA...............................74 CHAPTER 3: COOLING IT WITH JAMES BALDWIN............................................... 76 3.1 BALDWIN’S CRITIQUE OF HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY..............80
  • The Dagger of Islam

    The Dagger of Islam

    The Dagger of Islam JOHN LAFFIN John Laffin is one of the best-known writers on the Middle East and has traveled widely in the Islamic world. His books, which number eighty, include Middle East Journey, (The Arab-Israeli Dilemma), The Arab Mind and The Israeli Mind. He is also a regular contributor to the international press and to world encyclopedias. United Copts of Great Britain www.unitedcopts.org 1 First published by Sphere Books Ltd 1979 Contents Copyright © 1979 by John Laffin Reprinted 1981 1 Warnings 1 2 A Great Anguish, an Arc of Crisis 5 3 ‘History Surrendered to Our Will’ 8 4 ‘Distress, Misfortunes and Weakness’ 12 Contents 5 ‘No Compassion for Weakness’ 17 6 ‘Make War on Unbelievers’ 22 7 Purity and Punishment 25 8 al-Azhar – Islamic Policy Centre 31 9 Islam and Christianity 35 TRADE 10 Islam v the West’s ‘Intellectual Havoc’ 40 MARK 11 Islam and Economics 45 12 Islam Judged by its Minorities 48 13 Islam Judged by its Women 56 14 A Taste of Literature 62 This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, 15 Key Countries – Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without Iran, Turkey, Algeria, Lebanon, Tunisia 66 the publisher's prior consent in any form of 16 Africa – Drive for Converts 86 binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition 17 Uneasy Courtship – Soviet and Islam 88 including this condition being imposed on the 18 Out With the Dagger 92 subsequent purchaser.
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997

    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997

    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
  • An Enquiry Into the Abolition of the Inner London Education Authority (1964 to 1988), with Particular Reference to Politics and Policy Making

    An Enquiry Into the Abolition of the Inner London Education Authority (1964 to 1988), with Particular Reference to Politics and Policy Making

    University of Bath PHD An enquiry into the abolition of the Inner London Education Authority (1964-1988): with particular reference to politics and policy making Radford, Alan Award date: 2009 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 An Enquiry into the Abolition of the Inner London Education Authority (1964 to 1988), with Particular Reference To Politics and Policy Making Alan Radford A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD University of Bath Department of Education June 2009 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author.
  • The New Right Think Tanks and Policy Change in the Uk

    The New Right Think Tanks and Policy Change in the Uk

    THE NEW RIGHT THINK TANKS AND POLICY CHANGE IN THE UK Andrew James Tesseyman DPhil Thesis University of York Politics Department Submitted, February 1999 Abstract It has often been claimed that, during the 1980s and early 1990s, the new right think tanks — namely the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), and Adam Smith Institute (ASI) — had a major impact on policy-making and policy change. This thesis addresses such claims by examining three reforms in which the new right think tanks have been attributed an influence — bus deregulation, education reform, and prison privatisation. It seeks not only to empirically assess their impact, but also to relate these findings to the policy-making literature, in particular the Rhodes Model which emphasises policy continuity and the Advocacy Coalition Framework which seeks to explain policy change. It is argued that the new right think tanks had an impact on all three policy changes, as members of "advocacy coalitions", although the nature and extent of this impact varied. In some cases, the TEA, CPS, and ASI were able to have a direct impact on policy change, obtaining access to policy-makers through coalition allies. In other cases their impact was indirect, in shaping the broader "climate of ideas". The new right think tanks also contributed to new patterns of policy formulation, although there is limited evidence of any long-term structural impact on policy-making in these areas. It is also argued that the case studies raise a number of issues for the Rhodes Model and the Advocacy Coalition Framework, although these could be addressed by integrating the two to develop an approach to account for both policy continuity and policy change.
  • Bestiality and Religion

    Bestiality and Religion

    Bestiality and Religion Richard L. Matteoli Those who lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. Blackfoot proverb. (Monterey, Calif.) – Bestiality, one aspect of Zoophilia, causes cancer of the penis documented in a Brazilian interdisciplinary study.[1] Zoophilia, is categorized in the DSM-IV as a paraphilia not otherwise specified. Zoophilia is an erotic fixation on animals that may result in sexual excitement through real or fancied contact. Man having intercourse with a horse, exterior of temple in Khaguraho. Book illustration: Isfahan, Iran, 15th Century Kinsey reported 8% males and 3% females had sex with animals.[2-10] Incidence is higher with people living in a pastoral setting. The Brazilian study showed those living in a pastoral setting had a 35% participatory rate among men. Ancient Greek sodomizing a goat, plate XVII from ‘De Figuris Veneria’ The Brazilian penile cancer from bestiality study involved 492 where 118, 24%, presented with cancer of the penis from which there is a direct correlation with the 1 pastoral setting.[11-12] This may give credence to male circumcision’s origin in Africa and the Middle East millennia before any current thought. Feminine reproductive organ pathology is not evident compared penile to lesions. Female Genital Mutilation, according to Dr. Pia Gallo of the University of Padua, states its reason is feminine jealousy in genetic difference where Northern desert tribes invaded southern portions of Africa and African women have larger genitalia. From a punishment it then became a social phenomenon because of genetic traits being passed through intermarriage. The taboo of zoophilia has led to Art by Franz von Bayros stigmatized groups being accused depicting oral sex between of it, including blood libel.
  • Members 1979-2010

    Members 1979-2010

    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
  • The Religiosity of the Book of Song of Songs in Context

    The Religiosity of the Book of Song of Songs in Context

    THE RELIGIOSITY OF THE BOOK OF SONG OF SONGS IN CONTEXT by PIETER VAN DER ZWAN submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject OLD TESTAMENT at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF E H SCHEFFLER MARCH 2012 in loving memory of YVONNE VAN JAARSVELD (22 July 1957 – 11 August 1999) who taught me ִּכי- ַע ָּזה ַכ ָּמוֶת ַא ֲה ָּבה ABSTRACT Despite its chequered interpretational history, the book of Shîr ha-Shîrîm (Song of Songs) in the Hebrew Bible and Christian Old Testament has still not come to its fullest religious potential. The reason is that it has mainly served relatively closed religious traditions defined by the exclusion of those that have reacted against it. As the text of Song of Songs itself does not explicitly testify to any religiosity, these communities have understood it religiously by projecting their own predetermined needs and beliefs onto it. The text does, however, suggest several layers in the history of its formation, representing different levels of consciousness and stages of religiosity. In the postmodern globalising context where the importance of interfaith understanding is increasingly realised and the nature of human religiosity is constantly redefined in terms of ever-broadening horizons, the religiosity of the book has been stretched as wide as possible by also taking into consideration the ancient contextual influences which could have left their traces on the unconscious mind of its author(s) and redactor(s). To this end, the transpersonal psychological theory of Kenneth Wilber as interpreted by Michael Washburn has been used.
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1

    MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1

    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign