The New Mexico Volunteers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Mexico Volunteers THE NEW MEXICO VOLUNTEERS In the American Civil War 1861-1862 By David Poulin Index Introduction page 2 Chapter One – Texan Invasions page 5 Chapter Two – The Stage page 21 Chapter Three – The First Regiment page 42 Chapter Four – Recruitment Continues page 64 Chapter Five – Five Percent! page 88 Chapter Six – The Battle of Valverde page 113 Appendix – Unit Listings page 136 Index – List of Biographical Sketches page 143 Cover drawing by _________. _______ depicts the First New Mexico guarding the left flank of the army on the morning of the Battle of Valverde. They are observing the progress of the battle from their position. Colonel Kit Carson is standing in front with Captain Louis Felsenthal on the left. 2 INTRODUCTION It’s possible that history students and Civil War buffs will not understand the American Civil War in New Mexico if they are not familiar with New Mexico itself - it’s history and cultural heritage, in short – what kind of people lived here. If we read only the popular histories available on the Civil War period we get the impression that the New Mexicans had never volunteered for military duty before….that they were untrustworthy, untried, and their very enlistment was a great experiment of sorts, almost amounting to the controversial use of black troops in the eastern states. This is not quite how it was. We cannot look at the situation in the southwest with the same political, religious and cultural points of view that existed in the ‘mainstream’ United States. People here did not have any real experience with the issues of Negro slavery, State’s Rights, and economics as they existed east of the Mississippi. This was truly a foreign land – a world apart, so to speak. This failure to take into account a population’s unique demographics is not a new phenomenon. Most Americans, who entered New Mexico in the period after its conquest, did not understand the native New Mexicans, and early historians who recorded and recounted those American experiences followed through with many of the same biases. Therefore, this historical stereotype has passed down to today when modern historians take the Territory itself almost completely out of historical context. Part of the reason for this is that we have very few accounts that were written from a native point of view, Hispanic or Native American. But if we discount their point of view we are ignoring the vast majority of the people who lived here at the time. During the Texan invasion the Union troops were a conglomeration of United States Regular Army troops, NM Volunteer regiments, independent short-term volunteer companies, and NM Militia troops that were raised by the State of New Mexico. The generally accepted version of the Battle of Valverde is that everything went well for the Union until the Confederates made a massed charge on McRae’s artillery battery. The failure of the Union troops that day was attributed to the NM Volunteers who ran away in great numbers, and the reserve regiment of 2nd NM Volunteers that refused to cross the river and come to the aid of the beleaguered Union Regulars. Official reports give us the understanding that the US Regulars fought the battle virtually alone without any aid from the New Mexico Volunteers and Militia, which, it turns out, is not true. After the short campaign was over, and as if to consolidate the lie, most of the NM troops were summarily dismissed in disgrace. After the battle, the Connelly/Chaves family and many other influential families were completely outraged, a public outcry commenced, and Governor Connelly’s voice was among the loudest advocating restitution of the facts. However, the New Mexican Volunteers were never exonerated from the lies that prevailed and the damage to the people of the fledgling NM Territory was incalculable. They were stigmatized for generations as inferior citizens (they had been called that before, but now it was proven). Consequently most New Mexicans today do not even know there was a Civil War here, or that their ancestors may have taken part in it. Or, if they do know about it, they’ve only heard the official version of the story; nothing to be proud of. Another subsequent ‘collateral casualty’ is the fact that the State of New Mexico has had very little interest in commemorating or preserving the battlefields and related historical sites of this time period. It has been a difficult endeavor even to place monuments on the battlefields. What interest there was has been is due to private citizens and organizations, and some Federal agencies. Another consequence is the lack of historical works written from the point of view of the Volunteers. The NM Volunteers and militia were not perfect. They had many faults and problems. They had not all willingly become US citizens 14 years before, and the authorities in Washington still considered them a ‘captured’ and ‘imperfectly loyal’ people. In all the haste and confusion of recruitment, some had not even properly ‘volunteered’, and others were not exactly clear what they were fighting for, especially with their families at home endangered by constant Indian attacks. Some also had equipment and clothing problems as well as a lack of familiarity with 3 their arms. But incredibly, despite the hardships, prejudice, suspicion, and ill-treatment, the New Mexicans still served their new country when it counted. Did the NM Volunteers perform any worse than the US Regulars present at the Battle of Valverde? No. Truthfully, they performed with the same mixture of bravery and caution as the Regulars. Did the NM Volunteers perform any worse than Eastern US Volunteers in their first battle? If we have any doubts, we can consider the Union performance at the First Battle of Manassas (Bull Run). Again, we would have to say, “No.” In this book, we’ll try to examine the opening of the Civil War in New Mexico, and the first major battle, from a slightly broader perspective. Strictly speaking, this is not a Union story, nor a Confederate one. It is a New Mexico story. 4 Chapter One Texan Invasions The problems between New Mexico and Texas did not begin during the American Civil War. They began during the Texas revolution for independence in 1836. When General Sam Houston’s troops captured Santa Anna himself, Houston judiciously tried to cinch his success and avoid further bloodshed by making a deal with him. In return for sparing his life, the Mexican leader agreed to pull his troops out of Texas. It was a good move because Santa Anna had 4,000 fresh troops not twenty miles away. The Texan army followed the retreating Mexicans to the banks of the Rio Grande. Once there, Sam Houston and his officers inspected their newly won Territory and tried to decide where the western boundaries of their new country lay. Sam Houston General Houston stopped his forces on the banks of the Rio Grande where he believed the border between Texas and Mexico should be. All of his senior officers wanted the border to be a hundred miles west at a certain mountain range. They wanted complete control of the river valley. But Houston prevailed, insisting that the Rio Grande from the mouth of the river, north to 39 degrees latitude, and then eastward along northern New Mexico all the way to the Arkansas River, then at 100 degrees longitude south to the Red River, following the river to the border of Louisiana, and down to the Gulf of Mexico.1 Thus began the troubles between New Mexico and Texas as they claimed all of New Mexico’s land east of the Rio Grande. Even though the New Mexicans were completely unaware of this claim, the Texans thought it was a ‘done deal.’ As far as they were concerned the Mexican army was gone and they were free, and all that land was theirs. However, the Mexicans felt that Santa Anna’s agreement was a defeat they could not accept. To them, it had not won anyone’s independence yet. Therefore, Texas and Mexico were found themselves to be still at war in a continuing series of border fights. Whenever Mexico backed off the Texans would anger them with some belligerent event. For example, in September of 1836 they voted to be annexed to the United States but that wouldn’t happen for another nine years. Three months later they voted to include parts of four Mexican states into their Republic. Then they urged their sea captains to commit piracy on Mexican vessels. Meanwhile they heaped ethnic insults of all sorts upon the Mexicans in their newspapers, even calling them “an “imbecile nation” and an “abject race,” that was easier to kill than tolerate.2 Although the United States delayed the request to annex Texas as a state, they did recognize it as an independent republic early in 1837. The Texans, however, were not content to rule only their own domain. They quickly set about taking steps to exploit the weaknesses of 1 Frank S. Edwards, A Campaign in New Mexico with Colonel Doniphan (University of New Mexico Press, 1996), 3. 2 Time Life Books, The Old West Series, The Spanish West (Time Inc., 1976), 114. 5 Mexico by interfering in several of the revolutions that were going on in several states. They allied themselves with Mexican Rebels in the Yucatan and sent their small navy to blockade its port cities. By 1841 Mexican General Arial Arista was urging Mexicans everywhere to reconcile their differences in order to concentrate on the real enemy, Texas.
Recommended publications
  • Two New Mexican Lives Through the Nineteenth Century
    Hannigan 1 “Overrun All This Country…” Two New Mexican Lives Through the Nineteenth Century “José Francisco Chavez.” Library of Congress website, “General Nicolás Pino.” Photograph published in Ralph Emerson Twitchell, The History of the Military July 15 2010, https://www.loc.gov/rr/hispanic/congress/chaves.html Occupation of the Territory of New Mexico, 1909. accessed March 16, 2018. Isabel Hannigan Candidate for Honors in History at Oberlin College Advisor: Professor Tamika Nunley April 20, 2018 Hannigan 2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 I. “A populace of soldiers”, 1819 - 1848. ............................................................................................... 10 II. “May the old laws remain in force”, 1848-1860. ............................................................................... 22 III. “[New Mexico] desires to be left alone,” 1860-1862. ...................................................................... 31 IV. “Fighting with the ancient enemy,” 1862-1865. ............................................................................... 53 V. “The utmost efforts…[to] stamp me as anti-American,” 1865 - 1904. ............................................. 59 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 72 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manhunt Freezes Placitas Village As Hummer Burns, Ammo Explodes
    SANDOVAL PLACITAS PRSRT-STD U.S. Postage Paid BERNALILLO Placitas, NM Permit #3 CORRALES SANDOVAL Postal Customer or Current Resident COUNTY ECRWSS NEW MEXICO SignA N INDEPENDENT PLOCALO NEWSPAPERSt S INCE 1988 • VOL. 31 / NO .7 • JULY 2020 • FREE IVEN Branding campaign aids D ILL B BY businesses stung by PHOTOS U.S. 550 construction ~SIGNPOST STAFF TORY The double hit of a major highway project and a worldwide —S pandemic hit Bernalillo business owners Jose Morales and Tony Griffin differently. Both may benefit, however, from a marketing effort launched to create a regional brand and draw customers to the town and nearby businesses. Dubbed “Crossroads @ 550,” the program by the Town of Bernalillo and the Santa Ana Pueblo business subsidiary Tamaya Enterprises, with backing from the New Mexico Department of Transporta- tion, began in June with a website, Facebook page, and mer- chant discount coupons. Morales opened his Fresh for Less produce and Mexican- import market at 240 Highway 550 in June, 2019. By late October, a five-hundred-day project to widen the highway to Two days after two criminal suspects fleeing the law were pursued into Placitas village, the Hummer six lanes was underway, focused first on the new southside they torched and abandoned remained among scorched cottonwoods and trails of melted aluminum. lane before shifting last month to the north just outside Residents reported hearing an explosion believed to be ammunition left in the vehicle. Morales’s front door. “We had a good couple of months before construction started, especially when chile season started,” Morales told the Signpost.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Craig's 150Th Anniversary Commemoration, 2004
    1854-1885 Craig Fort Bureau of Land Management Land of Bureau Interior the of Department U.S. The New Buffalo Soldiers, from Shadow Hills, California, reenactment at Fort Craig's 150th Anniversary commemoration, 2004. Bureau of Land Management Socorro Field Office 901 S. Highway 85 Socorro, NM 87801 575/835-0412 or www.blm.gov/new-mexico BLM/NM/GI-06-16-1330 TIMELINE including the San Miguel Mission at Pilabó, present day Socorro. After 1540 Coronado expedition; Area inhabited by Piro and Apache 1598 Spanish colonial era begins the 1680 Pueblo Revolt, many of the Piro moved south to the El Paso, 1821 Mexico wins independence from Spain Before Texas area with the Spanish, probably against their will. Others scattered 1845 Texas annexed by the United States and joined other Pueblos, leaving the Apache in control of the region. 1846 New Mexico invaded by U.S. General Stephen Watts Kearney; Territorial period begins The Spanish returned in 1692 but did not resettle the central Rio Grande 1849 Garrison established in Socorro 1849 –1851 hoto courtesyhoto of the National Archives Fort Craig P valley for a century. 1851 Fort Conrad activated 1851–1854 Fort Craig lies in south central New Mexico on the Rio Grande, 1854 Fort Craig activated El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, or The Royal Road of the Interior, was with the rugged San Mateo Mountains to the west and a brooding the lifeline that connected Mexico City with Ohkay Owingeh, (just north volcanic mesa punctuating the desolate Jornada del Muerto to the east. of Santa Fe).
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of the Microfilm Edition of the Mexican Archives of New Mexico 1821-1846 Myra Ellen Jenkins
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository CSWR Reference Tools Center for Southwest Research 1970 Calendar of the Microfilm Edition of the Mexican Archives of New Mexico 1821-1846 Myra Ellen Jenkins Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cswr_reference Part of the Latin American History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Jenkins, Myra Ellen. "Calendar of the Microfilm Edition of the Mexican Archives of New Mexico 1821-1846." (1970). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cswr_reference/8 This Learning Object is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Southwest Research at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in CSWR Reference Tools by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALENDAR OF THE MICROFILM EDITION OF THE MEXICAN ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO 1821-1846 A Microfilm Project Sponsored by the NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS COMMISSION State of New Mexico Records Center Santa Fe, New Mexico 1970 CALENDAR OF THE MEXICAN ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO 1821-1846 by Myra Ellen Jenkins A Microfilm Project Sponsored by the NATIONAL HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS COMMISSION State of New Mexico Records Center Santa Fe, New Mexico 1970 CONTENTS Roll Number Year Page, 1 1821-1822 1 2 1823 8 3 1823-1824 9 4 1824-1825 12 5 1826 16 6 1826-1827 19 7 1827-1828 21 8 1828 26 9 1829 29 10 1829-1830 32 11 1830 35 12 1830 38 13 1831 40 14 1831-1832 43 15 1832 47 16 1833 50 17 1833 54 18 1834 56 19 1834-1835 59 20 1835 63 21 1835-1836 66 22 1836 70 23 1837 73 24 1837 77 25 1838 81 26 1839 86 27 1839-1840 89 28 1840-1841 93 29 1841 99 30 1841-1842 102 31 1842 106 32 1842 107 33 1843 113 34 1843 117 35 1844 120 36 1844 122 37 1844 127 38 1845 129 39 1845 132 40 1845 136 41 1846, undated 138 42 1821-1846 Legislative 144 Records 1 MEXICAN ARCHIVES OF NEW MEXICO Roll 1 1821-1822 Date Description Frame 1821 Many items in this year were also microfilmed in Roll 20 of The Spanish Archives of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's New Mexico Patronage: Saving the Far Southwest for the Union
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 75 Number 4 Article 3 10-1-2000 Lincoln's New Mexico Patronage: Saving the Far Southwest for the Union Deren Earl Kellogg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Kellogg, Deren Earl. "Lincoln's New Mexico Patronage: Saving the Far Southwest for the Union." New Mexico Historical Review 75, 4 (2000). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol75/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. President Abraham Lincoln, ca. 1861. (Photograph by Matthew Brady, neg. no. 0-60, courtesy The Lincoln Museum, Ft. Wayne, Ind.) Lincoln's New Mexico Patronage: Saving the Far Southwest for the Union DEREN EARL KELLOGG New Mexico Territory receives scant mention in connection with the administration of President Abraham Lincoln. Historians have generally concluded that Lincoln and other federal officials attached no great value to the territory and mostly neglected it. It is true that Lincoln could devote little attention to the administration of the western territories during the Civil War, which threatened the very future ofthe country. However, evi­ I, dence suggests that Lincoln did care about saving New Mexico:for the Union and should be given some credit for achieving this goal. Aithough Lincoln's western patronage record was generally undistinguished, his appointments to the New Mexico Territory were popular men who had' experience in the Southwest and who often did not identify themselves with the Republican Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmon Bloodgood Is the Only Civil War Veteran Buried in the Historic Cemetery at St
    By David Osborn Site Manager, St. Paul’s Church National Historic Site October 2014 Civil War Soldier Buried at St. Paul’s served with the Third Cavalry of the United States Army Harmon Bloodgood is the only Civil War veteran buried in the historic cemetery at St. Paul’s who served in the regular United States Army, distinct from the state volunteer regiments created to meet the crisis of the Union. Ten months before Southern batteries pummeled Fort Sumter in South Carolina signaling the onset of the Civil War, Bloodgood joined the cavalry. He enlisted in June 1860 for a five year tour in the First Mounted Rifles, which had been founded in 1846. The regiment was posted on the broad stretch of the southwest, New Mexico and Texas, fighting the Comanche and other Indian nations. Policing the western frontier of American settlement was the principal responsibility of the regular American army, a small force of about 16,000 soldiers. Recruits were primarily recent immigrants, mostly from Ireland and Germany. Bloodgood, 21, reflects another channel to the regular army: young men born in America, struggling with difficult circumstances, seeking consistent livelihood and adventure. He was one of five children of a laborer living in Monmouth County, New Jersey. Bloodgood’s enlistment reports an occupation of mason. The recession and reduction in employment in the Northern states caused by the panic 1857 may have contributed to his decision to join the army. He enrolled in New York City under an Masons preparing to set bricks in the 19th century. alias, Harry Black, perhaps an indication of a strategic decision to conceal identity, a feasible practice in the 19th century before a national classification system.
    [Show full text]
  • Burned the Crucifixes and Other Religious Objects That Had Been Scattered in and Around the Pueblo. Otermin's Army Repeated This
    burned the crucifixes and other religious objects not successful in reestablishing Spanish rule of that had been scattered in and around the the Pueblos, the interviews and explorations pueblo. Otermin's army repeated this ritual at Otermin and Mendoza conducted give the most Alamillo and Sevilleta. A short distance from complete picture of the effects of the revolt Sevilleta the army found deep pits where the among the pueblos. The Spanish presidio at El Indians had cached corn and protected it with a Paso sent two more punitive expeditions to New shrine of herbs. feathers and a clay vessel Mexico in 1688 and 1689 but it was not until the modeled with a human face and the body of a toad term of Governor Don Diego de Vargas (1690-1696) (Hackett and Shelby 1942:I:cxxix). On the march that New Mexico was reclaimed by Spain. from Socorro to Isleta. the army passed through the burned remains of four estancias. The The Aftermath of the Revolt estancia of Las Barrancas, located 23 leagues beyond Senecu and ten leagues downstream from Documentation of the 12-year period following the Isleta, was the only estancia that had not been Pueblo Revolt is scarce but speculation and greatly vandalized and burned (Hackett and Shelby conjecture abound. The more dramatic recon­ 1942:cxxx). structions of life among the Pueblos after the revolt show the Pueblos having destroyed every Otermin staged a surprise attack, taking Isleta vestige of Hispanic culture, including household Pueblo on December 6, 1681. About 500 Isleta and and religious objects, domesticated animals and Piro Indians were living in the village at the cereal crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War in New Mexico: Tall Tales and True Spencer Wilson and Robert A
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/34 The Civil War in New Mexico: Tall tales and true Spencer Wilson and Robert A. Bieberman, 1983, pp. 85-88 in: Socorro Region II, Chapin, C. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 34th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 344 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1983 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confederate Territory of Arizona, from Official Sources
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 17 Number 2 Article 4 4-1-1942 The Confederate Territory of Arizona, from Official Sources F. S. Donnell Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Donnell, F. S.. "The Confederate Territory of Arizona, from Official Sources." New Mexico Historical Review 17, 2 (). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol17/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. THE CONFEDERATE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, AS COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES, By F. S. DONNELL HE TERRITORY of New Mexico was formed under an act T · of congress passed September 9th, 1850, and included· in its boundaries part of the lands transferred by Mexico to the United States after the Mexican War and part of the territory ceded by Texas in 1850. Its northern boundary was described as running west from the 103rd degree of longitude and the 38th degree of latitude to the summit of the Sierra Madre, thence south with the crest of said mountains to the 37th parallel, thence west to the boundary line of California. Its southern boundary followeg the boundary line of the Republic of Mexico east to the Rio Grande, thence along the 32nd parallel to the 103rd degree of longitude. This territory was enlarged on August 4th, 1854, by ' the addition of the Gadsden purchase; and it was reduced by the formation .of Colorado Territory in 1861, which took away all lands north of the 37th parallel, and of Arizona Territory in 1863 which took all west of the 109th degree r \ of longitude, leaving the boundaries as they exist today.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Garrisoning of the Southwest
    Contents “Manifest Destiny” ........................................................................................................ 4 Outpost in Apacheria .................................................................................................. 10 The Apache as W arrior ................................................................................................ 12 Dragoons: Garrisoning the Gadsden Purchase ...................................................... 18 Outposts: Tactics in the Apache Campaigns ........................................................... 20 Outposts: Col. Bonneville and the ............................................................................ 33 1857 Battle of the Gila River ....................................................................................... 33 Outposts: The U.S. Army in the Pimeria Alta ........................................................... 36 Voices: Bald y Ewell at For t Buchanan...................................................................... 43 Outposts: The Navaho Campaigns of 1858-60 ......................................................... 44 Roll Call: Sarah Bowman—The Great W estern ........................................................ 49 Outposts: The Anglo Settlers .................................................................................... 51 The Rancher ................................................................................................................. 51 The Miner ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hispanics in the American Civil War 1 Hispanics in the American Civil War
    Hispanics in the American Civil War 1 Hispanics in the American Civil War Hispanics in the American Civil War First row David Farragut • Santos Benavides • Augusto Rodriguez Second row Federico Fernández Cavada • Julius Peter Garesché • Luis F. Emilio Third row Loreta Janeta Velazquez as herself (right) and disguised as "Lieutenant Harry Buford" (left) Hispanics in the American Civil War fought on both the Union and Confederate sides of the conflict. Not all the Hispanics who fought in the American Civil War were "Hispanic-Americans", in other words citizens of the United States. Many of them were Spanish subjects or nationales from countries in the Caribbean, Central and South America. Some were born in a US Territory and therefore did not have the right to US Citizenship. It is estimated that approximately 3,500 Hispanics, mostly Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans and Cubans (Puerto Rico and Cuba were Spanish colonies) living in the United States joined the war: 2,500 for the Confederacy and 1,000 for the Union. This number increased to 10,000 by the end of the war. Hispanic is an ethnic term employed to categorize any citizen or resident of the United States, of any racial background, of any country, and of any religion, who has at least one ancestor from the people of Spain or is of non-Hispanic origin, but has an ancestor from Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Central or South America, or some other Hispanic origin. The three largest Hispanic groups in the United States are the Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans.[1] The Union Army was the land force that fought for the Union during the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Brave Christian Soldiers: the New Mexico Territorial Militia in the Civil War
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 89 Number 3 Article 2 7-1-2014 Brave Christian Soldiers: The New Mexico Territorial Militia in the Civil War Jerry D. Thompson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Thompson, Jerry D.. "Brave Christian Soldiers: The New Mexico Territorial Militia in the Civil War." New Mexico Historical Review 89, 3 (2014). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol89/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. • Brave Christian Soldiers • The New Mexico Territorial Militia in the Civil War JERRY D. THOMPSON he mood in the capital was one of confusion and great anxiety on the cold wintry morning of 1 February 1862. New York–born Surveyor Gen. TJohn Anderson Clark watched the arrival of several militia companies, all scurrying south to meet a large Confederate Army that was reported to be moving out of the Mesilla Valley. “Today was the arrival in the town of two or three small companies of yeomanry on their way to war,” Clark recorded. “They leave tomorrow for the South—of course these undisciplined troops will not be taken to meet the enemy in the open field, but will be used as guerrillas and to garrison posts.”1 The next day, after the militia marched to St. Francis Church and lined up in formation, Bishop Jean-Baptiste Lamy appeared in full regalia on the steps of the adobe edifice.
    [Show full text]