DOCSLIB.ORG

Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Cultivation, Production and Implications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Cultivation, Production and Implications Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Cultivation, Production and Implications Research In Southeast Asia, UNODC supports Member States to develop and implement evidence‐ based rule of law, drug control and related criminal justice responses through the Regional Programme 2014‐2018 and aligned country programmes including the Myanmar Country Programme 2014‐2018. This study is connected to the Mekong MOU on Drug Control which UNODC actively supports through the Regional Programme, including the commitment to develop data and evidence as the basis for countries of the Mekong region to respond to challenges of drug production, trafficking and use. UNODC’s Research and Trend Analysis Branch promotes and supports the development and implementation of surveys globally, including through its Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (ICMP). The implementation of Myanmar opium survey was made possible thanks to the financial support of the Governments of Japan, the United States of America and China. UNODC Regional Office for Southeast Asia and the Pacific Telephone: +6622882100 Fax: +6622812129 Email: unodc‐[email protected] Website: www.unodc.org/southeastasiaandpacific Twitter: @UNODC_SEAP The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNODC concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Front cover photos: Jeremy Douglas and Akara Umapornsakula, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. i Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... i Key findings ....................................................................................................................... iii Fact Sheet ...........................................................................................................................v 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2. Findings .................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Estimated area under opium poppy cultivation ...................................................... 11 2.2 Opium yield and production estimates ................................................................... 15 2.3 Opium farm‐gate price ............................................................................................ 18 2.4 Opium economy in Myanmar .................................................................................. 19 3. Eradication and Seizures ........................................................................................... 25 3.1 Eradication ............................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Seizures .................................................................................................................... 27 4. Methodology ........................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Area estimation ....................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Yield and potential opium production estimation .................................................. 42 4.3 Estimating the value of opium economy in Myanmar ............................................ 47 Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Acknowledgments Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control Pol. Lt. Gen. Aung Win Oo Chief of Myanmar Police Force, Secretary of CCDAC Pol. Brig. Gen. Win Naing Commander of Drug Enforcement Division, Joint Secretary of CCDAC Pol. Col. Oke Soe Tun Head of Project Management Department, CCDAC Forest Department Dr. Nyi Nyi Kyaw Director General, Forest Department U Saw Daniel Assistant Director, Forest Department UNODC Southeast Asia and the Pacific Jeremy Douglas Regional Representative, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Akara Umapornsakula Graphic Designer Katherine North UNAC International Development Programme Troels Vester Country Manager, Myanmar San Lwin Htwe GIS Specialist and Survey Coordinator Naing gLin Aun Data Analyst UNODC Headquarters Angela Me Chief, Research and Trend Analysis Branch (RAB) Anja Korenblik Chief, Programme and Development Unit (PDMU) Coen Bussink Programme Officer, Team Leader, PDMU Iban Ameztoy Aramendi Programme Officer, Remote Sensing and GIS, PDMU Lorenzo Vita Research Officer, PDMU Irmgard Zeiler Statistician, PDMU Abbreviations BGF Border Guard Force CCDAC Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control GOUM Government of the Republic of the Union on Myanmar HR High Resolution ICMP UNODC Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme KIA Kachin Independence Army KNLP Kayan New Land Party KNPLF Karenni National People’s Liberation Front KNPP Karenni National Progressive Party LCLU Land Cover Land Use MNDAA Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (Kokant) NDAA National Democratic Alliance Army (Mongla Special Region) PDMU Programme Management and Development Programme PMF People’s Militia Force (Local Militia Forces) PNLA Pa‐O National Liberation Army QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control RAB Research and Trend Analysis Branch RCSS Restoration Council of Shan State (Shan State Army‐South) SR Special Region SSPP Shan State Progress Party (Shan State Army‐North) SSS Shan State South (Homein) TNLA Ta’ang National Liberation Army UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime UWSA United Wa State Army (Wa Special Region) VHR Very High Resolution i Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 ii Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Key findings In 2018, the area under opium poppy cultivation in Myanmar was estimated at 37,300 hectares. In comparison to 2017, the area under opium cultivation decreased, continuing the downward trend that started in 2014. 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 Hectares 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Best estimate Upper and lower limits In the two main producer states, Shan and Kachin, the area under opium poppy cultivation decreased by 12 per cent or 4,900 hectares from 41,000 hectares in 2017 to 36,100 hectares in 2018.1 In addition, in Chin and Kayah States together, an estimated 1,200 hectares of opium poppy were cultivated. Reductions have taken place in practically all regions, including North, East and South Shan with decreases of 7%, 8% and 17% respectively, and Kachin State with 15%. Chin and Kayah States twere no surveyed in 2017. Compared to the latest year available, 2015, total opium poppy cultivation in these two states increased by 26% or by 250 hectares in 2018. The average opium yield remained rather stable at 13.9 kilograms per hectare, with a 4% increase compared to 2017. Potential opium production was estimated at 520 metric tons in 2018. Shan State, which supplied nearly 90% of the total, remained the main producing region with 461 mt which is a decrease of 8% compared to last year. Eradication ‐as reported by the Government‐ showed a similar trend to opium poppy cultivation over the last nine years, with increases from 2010 to 2012‐2014 and a decrease since 2015. The eradication numbers for the 2018 growing season (from September 2017 to March 2018) were 26% lower than for the same period in 2017. Opiate seizures have increased since 2015. Fore th period January to June 2018, almost 3,000 kilograms of seized opiates were reported, already surpassing the total reported seizures for 2017. With an estimated gross value ranging from 1.1 to 2.3 billion USD, the illegal opiate market in Myanmar represented a notable share of the country’s economy in 2018 (1.5 – 3.3 % of 2017 GDP). Of this total, about 5%, corresponding to an estimated amount of 62 to 103 million USD, or 0.4 % of the agricultural sector’s value, was earned by farmers cultivating opium. 1 The exact percentage change from 2017 to 2018 cannot be estimated at the national level, because Chin and Kayah states were not assessed in 2017. iii Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 The largest share of the 2018 opiate market value was income generated by heroin manufacturing and trafficking. Domestic heroin consumption of 7.6 tons was valued at 238 ‐ 401 million USD, whereas the export of heroin (20 ‐ 45 tons) was worth between 782 and 1,798 million USD Between 2015 and 2018, farm‐gate prices2 of fresh and dry opium decreased by 34 and 45 %, respectively. Decreasing prices together with a reduced supply of opium can be an indication of a decreased demand for opiates from Myanmar in the country and the region. 2Average farm‐gate prices. Average is weighted based on production. Prices are inflation adjusted for the analysis of trends. iv Myanmar Opium Survey 2018 Fact Sheet Change Year 2017 Year 2018 2017‐2018 Total opium poppy cultivation (ha)3, 4 41,000 37,300 NA5 (30,200 to 51,900) (29,700 to 47,200) Opium poppy cultivation 37,100 32,700 ‐12% in Shan State (ha) (26,500 to 47,600) (25,300 to 42,400) Opium poppy cultivation 3,900 3,400 ‐13% in Kachin State (ha) (1,500 to 6,400) (1,800 to 5,800) Opium poppy cultivation 630 NA NA6 in Chin State (ha) (573 to 677) Opium poppy cultivation 570 NA NA7 in Kayah State (ha) (434 to 706) Total
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KACHIN STATE, BHAMO DISTRICT Bhamo Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census KACHIN STATE, BHAMO DISTRICT Bhamo Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Kachin State, Bhamo District Bhamo Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1: Map of Kachin State, showing the townships Bhamo Township Figures at a Glance 1 Total Population 135,877 2 Population males 66,718 (49.1%) Population females 69,159 (50.9%) Percentage of urban population 43.2% Area (Km2) 1,965.8 3 Population density (per Km2) 69.1 persons Median age 25.2 years Number of wards 13 Number of village tracts 45 Number of private households 24,161 Percentage of female headed households 29.7% Mean household size 4.9 persons 4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 30.5% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 64.8% Elderly population (65+ years) 4.7% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 54.2 Child dependency ratio 46.9 Old dependency ratio 7.3 Ageing index 15.5 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 97 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 94.7% Male 96.8% Female 93.0% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 7,448 5.5 Walking 2,977 2.2 Seeing 4,114 3.0 Hearing 2,262 1.7 Remembering 2,380 1.8 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship Scrutiny 81,655 74.7 Associate Scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • The Union Report the Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Census Report Volume 2
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report The Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Volume Report : Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Figure 1: Map of Myanmar by State, Region and District Census Report Volume 2 (Union) i Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014 and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is my hope that the main census results will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and Offices at all administrative levels and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census.
    [Show full text]
  • Grave Diggers a Report on Mining in Burma
    GRAVE DIGGERS A REPORT ON MINING IN BURMA BY ROGER MOODY CONTENTS Abbreviations........................................................................................... 2 Map of Southeast Asia............................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ................................................................................... 4 Author’s foreword ................................................................................... 5 Chapter One: Burma’s Mining at the Crossroads ................................... 7 Chapter Two: Summary Evaluation of Mining Companies in Burma .... 23 Chapter Three: Index of Mining Corporations ....................................... 29 Chapter Four: The Man with the Golden Arm ....................................... 43 Appendix I: The Problems with Copper.................................................. 53 Appendix II: Stripping Rubyland ............................................................. 59 Appendix III: HIV/AIDS, Heroin and Mining in Burma ........................... 61 Appendix IV: Interview with a former mining engineer ........................ 63 Appendix V: Observations from discussions with Burmese miners ....... 67 Endnotes .................................................................................................. 68 Cover: Workers at Hpakant Gem Mine, Kachin State (Photo: Burma Centrum Nederland) A Report on Mining in Burma — 1 Abbreviations ASE – Alberta Stock Exchange DGSE - Department of Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration (Burma)
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS in KACHIN Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN Photo credits Mike Adair Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research A photo record of the UNDP Governance Mapping Trip for Kachin State. Travel to Tanai, Putao, Momauk and Myitkyina townships from Jan 6 to Jan 23, 2015 is available here: http://tinyurl.com/Kachin-Trip-2015 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Kachin State 7 2.1 Kachin geography 9 2.2 Population distribution 10 2.3 Socio-economic dimensions 11 2.4 Some historical perspectives 13 2.5 Current security situation 18 2.6 State institutions 18 3. Methodology 24 3.1 Objectives of mapping 25 3.2 Mapping tools 25 3.3 Selected townships in Kachin 26 4. Governance at the front line – Findings on participation, responsiveness and accountability for service provision 27 4.1 Introduction to the townships 28 4.1.1 Overarching development priorities 33 4.1.2 Safety and security perceptions 34 4.1.3 Citizens’ views on overall improvements 36 4.1.4 Service Provider’s and people’s views on improvements and challenges in selected basic services 37 4.1.5 Issues pertaining to access services 54 4.2 Development planning and participation 57 4.2.1 Development committees 58 4.2.2 Planning and use of development funds 61 4.2.3 Challenges to township planning and participatory development 65 4.3 Information, transparency and accountability 67 4.3.1 Information at township level 67 4.3.2 TDSCs and TMACs as accountability mechanisms 69 4.3.3 WA/VTAs and W/VTSDCs 70 4.3.4 Grievances and disputes 75 4.3.5 Citizens’ awareness and freedom to express 78 4.3.6 Role of civil society organisations 81 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Kahrl Navigating the Border Final
    CHINA AND FOREST TRADE IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION: IMPLICATIONS FOR FORESTS AND LIVELIHOODS NAVIGATING THE BORDER: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CHINA- MYANMAR TIMBER TRADE Fredrich Kahrl Horst Weyerhaeuser Su Yufang FO RE ST FO RE ST TR E ND S TR E ND S COLLABORATING INSTITUTIONS Forest Trends (http://www.forest-trends.org): Forest Trends is a non-profit organization that advances sustainable forestry and forestry’s contribution to community livelihoods worldwide. It aims to expand the focus of forestry beyond timber and promotes markets for ecosystem services provided by forests such as watershed protection, biodiversity and carbon storage. Forest Trends analyzes strategic market and policy issues, catalyzes connections between forward-looking producers, communities, and investors and develops new financial tools to help markets work for conservation and people. It was created in 1999 by an international group of leaders from forest industry, environmental NGOs and investment institutions. Center for International Forestry Research (http://www.cifor.cgiar.org): The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), based in Bogor, Indonesia, was established in 1993 as a part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) in response to global concerns about the social, environmental, and economic consequences of forest loss and degradation. CIFOR research produces knowledge and methods needed to improve the wellbeing of forest-dependent people and to help tropical countries manage their forests wisely for sustained benefits. This research is conducted in more than two dozen countries, in partnership with numerous partners. Since it was founded, CIFOR has also played a central role in influencing global and national forestry policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Kachin State Development Prospects and Priorities
    79 John F. Kennedy Street, Box 74 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617-495-1134 www.ash.harvard.edu/myanmar-program Kachin State Development Prospects and Priorities Prepared for Proximity Designs | Myanmar May 2016 This research paper was written by David Dapice ([email protected]) following a trip to the region in January 2016. The views expressed herein are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect those of Proximity, the Government of the Union of Myanmar, or Harvard University. This study, along with other recent Ash-Proximity reports on Myanmar, is posted at http://ash.harvard.edu/journal-articles Rakhine State Policies for the New State Government Page 2 of 14 Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Resource Curse and the Political Economy of Kachin Development ............................................................ 4 Kachin in a National Perspective ................................................................................................................... 5 Issues Specific to Kachin State ...................................................................................................................... 7 Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Convergence of NLD and Kachin Administrations .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KACHIN STATE Myanmar
    Myanmar Information Management Unit KACHIN STATE Myanmar 95°30'E 96°0'E 96°30'E 97°0'E 97°30'E 98°0'E 98°30'E 99°0'E 28°30'N Ü 28°30'N 28°0'N 28°0'N Nawngmun INDIA Puta-O Pannandin !( Nawngmun 27°30'N 27°30'N Putao oAirport Machanbaw Puta-O Pansaung !( Khaunglanhpu Machanbaw Khaunglanhpu Nanyun 27°0'N 27°0'N Don Hee !( !( Shin Bway Yang Sumprabum Sumprabum Tanai 26°30'N 26°30'N KACHIN Tsawlaw Tanai Lahe Tsawlaw Injangyang Htan Par Hkamti Kway 26°0'N o Khamti 26°0'N Airport Chipwi Injangyang Chipwi Myitkyina Hpakan Pang War Hpakan !( Kamaing !( 25°30'N 25°30'N Myitkyina Kan Mogaung Airport o Paik Ti Nampong Sadung !( oAir Base .!Myitkyina !( Mogaung Waingmaw Waingmaw SAGAING LAKE INDAWNGYI !( 25°0'N Hopin CHINA 25°0'N Mohnyin !( Mohnyin Sinbo Momauk Dawthponeyan !( Myo Hla 24°30'N !( 24°30'N Banmauk Bhamo Shwegu Bamaw SAGAING oAirport Momauk Shwegu Bhamo Indaw Katha !( Lwegel Mansi Pinlebu !( Maw !( !( Monekoe Hteik Pang Hseng (Kyu Koke) Manhlyoe 24°0'N (Manhero) Muse 24°0'N Mansi !( Wuntho Konkyan Namhkan Kilometers Kawlin Tigyaing 0 15 30 60 90 SHAN Laukkaing 95°30'E 96°0'E 96°30'E 97°0'E 97°30'E 98°0'E 98°30'E 99°0'E Tarmoenye !( Legend Elevation (Meter) Map ID: MIMU940v01 Takaung < 50 1,250 - 1,500 3,000 - 3,250 Data Sources : Myanmar Information Management Unit (MIMU) is a !( o Major Road Township Boundary River/Water Body Creation Date: 4 December 2012.A1 Airports Mabein 50 - 100 1,500 - 1,750 3,250 - 3,500 Base Map - MIMU ChinshwehawcommonNamtit resource of the Humanitarian Country Team Other Road District Boundary Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Non-Perennial 100 - 250 1,750 - 2,000 3,500 - 3,750 Boundaries - WFP/MIMU (HCT) providing information management services, ^(!_ Capital including GIS mapping and analysis, to the humanitarian Railway State/Region Boundary Perennial 250 - 500 2,000 - 2,250 3,750 - 4,000 River and Stream - DCW Elevation : SRTM 90m and development actors both inside and outside of .! State Capital River and Stream International Boundary 500 - 750 2,250 - 2,500 4,000 - 7,007 Place names - Ministry of Home Affair Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • ACLED – Myanmar Conflict Update – Table 1
    Actor Name Ideology Status Areas of Operation Affiliations Modus Operandi & Adversaries - Armed wing of ULA: United - Chin State League of Arakan - Battles and Remote violence against Active - Kachin State - Member of FPNCC Myanmar Security Forces Arakan Ethnic combatant; not - Rakhine State (Northern Alliance) - Battles against Bangladeshi Security AA: Arakan Army Nationalism party to 2015 - Shan State - NCCT, , , Forces ceasefire - Myanmar-Bangladesh - Allied with KIA - Battles against ALA Border - Formerly allied with ABSDF (pre-ceasefire) - Myanmar-Thailand ABSDF: All Burma Liberal Party to 2015 Border - Battled against Myanmar Security - Allied with KIA, AA, KNLA Students’ Democratic Front democracy ceasefire - Myanmar-India Border Forces - Myanmar-China Border Active AA: Arakan Army (Kayin): Arakan Ethnic combatant; not - Member of NCCT, ANC - Kayin State - Battles against Myanmar Security Forces Arakan State Army Nationalism party to 2015 - Allied with DKBA-5 ceasefire - Armed wing of the ALP: ALA: Arakan Liberation Arakan Liberation Party - Battled against Myanmar Security Army Arakan Ethnic Party to 2015 - Rakhine State - Member of NCCT, ANC Forces Nationalism ceasefire - Kayin State - Allied with AA: Arakan (Also known as RSLP: Rakhine - Battled against AA State Liberation Party) Army (Kayin), KNLA, SSA-S WWW.ACLEDDATA.COM | Conflict Update – Myanmar – Table 1 Rohingya Ethnic Active ARSA: Arakan Rohingya - Rakhine State Nationalism; combatant; not Salvation Army - Myanmar-Bangladesh UNKNOWN - Battles against Myanmar Security
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Northern Shan State and Prospects for Peace
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE PEACEBRIEF234 United States Institute of Peace • www.usip.org • Tel. 202.457.1700 • @usip September 2017 DAVID SCOTT MATHIESON Burma’s Northern Shan State Email: [email protected] and Prospects for Peace Summary • Increased armed conflict between the Burmese Army and several ethnic armed organizations in northern Shan State threaten the nationwide peace process. • Thousands of civilians have been displaced, human rights violations have been perpetrated by all parties, and humanitarian assistance is being increasingly blocked by Burmese security forces. • Illicit economic activity—including extensive opium and heroin production as well as transport of amphetamine stimulants to China and to other parts of Burma—has helped fuel the conflict. • The role of China as interlocutor between the government, the military, and armed actors in the north has increased markedly in recent months. • Reconciliation will require diverse advocacy approaches on the part of international actors toward the civilian government, the Tatmadaw, ethnic armed groups, and civil society. To facili- tate a genuinely inclusive peace process, all parties need to be encouraged to expand dialogue and approach talks without precondition. Even as Burma has “transitioned from decades Introduction of civil war and military rule Even as Burma has transitioned—beginning in late 2010—from decades of civil war and military to greater democracy, long- rule to greater democracy, long-standing and widespread armed conflict has resumed between several ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and the Burmese armed forces (Tatmadaw). Early in standing and widespread 2011, a 1994 ceasefire agreement broke down as relations deterioriated in the wake of the National armed conflict has resumed.” League for Democracy government’s refusal to permit Kachin political parties to participate in the elections that ended the era of military rule in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • They Block Everything
    Cover: Border Post 6 camp for displaced “ civilians near the China border in Myanmar’s Kachin State. Myanmar government restrictions on humanitarian aid have resulted in shortages of blankets, clothing, THEY bedding, and other essential items, making harsh winters unnecessarily difficult for displaced civilians. ©James Higgins / Partners Relief and BLOCK Development, February 2016 EVERYTHING“ Avoidable Deprivations in Humanitarian Aid to Ethnic Civilians Displaced by War in Kachin State, Myanmar Fortify Rights works to ensure human rights for all. We investigate human rights violations, engage people with power on solutions, and strengthen the work of human rights defenders, affected communities, and civil society. We believe in the influence of evidence-based research, the power of strategic truth- telling, and the importance of working closely with individuals, communities, and movements pushing for change. We are an independent, nonprofit organization based in Southeast Asia and registered in the United States and Switzerland. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8 METHODOLOGY � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17 BACKGROUND �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 19 I. RESTRICTIONS ON HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 25 II� IMPACTS OF AID RESTRICTIONS ON DISPLACED POPULATIONS IN KACHIN STATE� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Finding an Endgame in Kachin State the KIO’S Strategies for Finding a Resolution to the Conflict
    EBO Background Paper - No .3 | 2018 September 2018 AUTHOR | Paul Keenan Finding an Endgame in Kachin State The KIO’s strategies for finding a resolution to the conflict Since 9 June 2011, Kachin State has seen open (CEFU). The Committee’s purpose was to conflict between the Kachin Independence Army consolidate a political front at a time when the and the Tatmadaw (Myanmar military). The Kachin ceasefire groups faced perceived imminent attacks Independence Organisation had signed a ceasefire by the Tatmadaw. However, in November 2010 agreement with the regime in 1994 and since then shortly after the Myanmar elections, the political had lived in relative peace until the ceasefire was grouping was transformed into a military united broken by the Tatmadaw in June 2011. front. At a conference held from the 12-16 February 2011, CEFU declared its dissolution and the The increased territorial infractions by the formation of the United Nationalities Federal Tatmadaw combined with economic exploitation Council (UNFC). The UNFC, which was at that time by China in Kachin territory, especially the comprised of 12 ethnic organisations1, stated that: construction of the Myitsone Hydropower Dam, left the Kachin Independence Organisation with very The goal of the UNFC is to establish the little alternative but to return to armed resistance future Federal Union (of Myanmar) and to prevent further abuses of its people and their the Federal Union Army is formed for territory’s natural resources. Despite this, however, giving protection to the people of the the political situation since the beginning of country.2 hostilities has changed significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Kachin State WATCH
    H U M A N R I G H T S “UNTOLD MISERIES” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Kachin State WATCH “Untold Miseries” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Burma’s Kachin State Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-874-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MARCH 2012 1-56432-874-0 “Untold Miseries” Wartime Abuses and Forced Displacement in Burma’s Kachin State Map of Burma ...................................................................................................................... i Detailed Map of Kachin State .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]