DOCSLIB.ORG

The Patagonia Area Mining Districts, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1530

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Patagonia Area Mining Districts, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1530 Chapter 3 THE PATAGONIA AREA MINING DISTRICTS, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1539-1930 © 1998 Robert Lenon The Patagonia Mining Districts, for purposes of this worked by Indians because of the number of worn­ article are defined as the area lying within 20 miles out or broken stone hammers found at the site. of the Town of Patagonia and within what is now Similar evidence exists in the Salero-Alto vicinity Santa Cruz County, Arizona. Local custom and in the Tyndall District. The author has also observed usage has divided this region into eight mining dis­ an irregular shallow pit in the extreme southeast tricts: The Santa Rita Mountains and its foothills comer of Pima County, excavating a narrow veinlet are included within the Greaterville, Tyndall, Aztec of azurite-chrysocolla that appeared to have been and Wrightson Mining Districts, and then, begin­ explored by primitive means. This inference was ning with the Nogales District encompassing the strengthened, although not necessarily confirmed, area around Mt. Benedict northeast of Nogales, by the presence of a lone flint arrowhead found in a Arizona, and proceeding east, one then finds the dump alongside the pit. Patagonia, Harshaw and Red Rock Mining Districts. All but the Nogales District have been for­ The earliest European traveler was probably the mally organized (mostly during the 1870s) follow­ Franciscan monk, Marcos de Niza, who traversed ing the procedures permitted under the federal min­ the San Pedro Valley twice in 1539 and then guided ing laws. the party of Francisco Vasquez de Coronado north­ ward along the San Pedro, which they called the The Town of Patagonia lies barely inside the "Nexpa," in search of the fabled Seven Cities of northerly limits of the Harshaw District, some Clbola in the spring of 1540. During this entrada seven miles from the mining district from which the the first mineral values were noted when small town took its name. The mine actually called the amounts of placer gold were found at a place the "Patagonia" has also borne the name "Mowry members of the expedition were told was called Silver Mine" since the late 1850s and was probably "Suya," probably near the junction of Babocomari called the "Plomosa" (for plomo, "lead" in Spanish) Creek with the San Pedro River northeast of present in missionary times. The mine was known as the Fairbank, Arizona, and named Santa Cruz de "Patagonia" as early as 1854 and gave the name to Gaybanipitea. the Patagonia Mountains about the same time. A post office was established at the mine during 1866- The Jesuit Period: 1691 to 1767 67 using "Patagonia" about the time the mining dis­ The so-called Jesuit Period began in 1691 when two trict acquired its name. missionaries of the Society of Jesus, Juan Marfa de Earliest Times: Prior to 1640 Salvatierra and Eusebio Francisco Kino, while vis­ iting the small mission community of Saric, 35 Because the Patagonia district is flanked on the miles southwest of present-day Nogales, Arizona, west and east by natural north-south "water-level were invited by a delegation of Indians from the routes," the valleys of the San Miguel, Sonora and Tumacacori settlement to establish a mission or Santa Cruz Rivers were the home to many genera­ visita in their neighborhood. The fathers accepted tions of different aboriginal tribes. These peoples the invitation and were so pleased with what they would have been the first prospectors and miners of saw they decided to formally establish the the region to meet the needs for tools and weapons Tumacacori visita. On their return, Salvatierra and (flint), pottery (clay), dyeing and body paint Kino traveled to Dolores Mission (some 60 miles (ocher), and personal adornment (turquoise, mala­ south and east of modem Nogales) by way of San chite, chrysocolla and jasper). The old-timers Antonio Pass and a nearby village they called reported that portions of the iron-red outcroppings "Santa Maria de Suamca" near the source of a of the Trench Mine, lying about a mile to the north­ stream which thus became known as the Rio Santa west of what is now Harshaw, must have been Maria. By custom, streams in northern Sonora bear 53 54 Robert Lenon the names of the principal settlements nearest their The troops at Tubac, like those in all of the pre­ source, and therefore, when this settlement's name sidios, were woefully underpaid and were also was changed to "Santa Cruz," the name of the river poorly armed and mounted. They were therefore flowing northward through Tucson was "automati­ unable to respond to the guerrilla warfare being cally" also changed to "Santa Cruz." waged by the Apache. Only the communities of Tucson (the troops at Tubac had been transferred Father Kino's interests, unfortunately for mmmg there in 1777), Tumacacori and Guevavi were rela­ historians, did not include mineral development and tively safe although livestock was frequently stam­ therefore his diaries are limited to brief mentions of peded away and fields burned in raids. The small rumors of a quicksilver (mercury) deposit said to lie farming and mining community of Aribac (Arivaca) some "five days west" of the Cas a Grande ruins and seemed to have been far enough off the raiding a silver deposit that had been found "several days trails of the time and the value of the silver ores at travel" west of San Xavier del Bac. Other Jesuits its Longorena mine high enough to justify the risk following Kino seemed more interested in minerals. to life and limb to engage in mining efforts during Fr. Joseph Och, at the village of San Jose de lmuris periods of apparent calm. wrote of mines and smelting in the 1750s and of a deposit of native copper "a day and a half journey Very little has been reported on activities in the dis­ toward the northwest from my Mission of San trict during this time although a somewhat suspect Ignacio [de Caborica]." This would probably place account was published in the (Yuma) Arizona the site near Cobre (Copper) Ridge, adjacent to pre­ Sentinel on Aprill3, 1878, purporting to be a trans­ sent-day Ruby, Arizona. Fr. Ignaz Pfefferkorn, of lation of a petition written by Francisco Castro and San Francisco de Atf, wrote of 11 active gold and Antonio Romero to Don Manuel Baragua (the silver mines during his service there. This would reporter misread this as "Barragan") dated have included only two mines within the Patagonia November 21 , 1777, requesting the restoration of District, at Buena Vista and San Antonio, both fortifications at Tubac. This letter reported the pres­ located only a few miles to the north of the present ence of many mines at Aribac that yielded international border and 10 and 14 miles, respec­ sopotable (tolerable) grades of silver and that a fine tively, to the east of Nogales. Fr. Juan Nentvig, at gold placer in the Bavoquivari Valley existed. Silver Guasavas in 1762, found time to write of dozens of mines in the Santa Ritas were also noted, but that mines and ranches in Northern Sonora, the majori­ they couldn't be worked because of the Apaches at ty of which were abandoned at the time because of Agua Caliente (which site still bears this name incursions of the Seri and Apache Indians. In fact, today). the main attention at the time was to the south of the district, in and around Arizona, where a purported The land in the VICinity of Agua Caliente was native silver deposit called the planchas de plata known to be well mineralized and several indepen­ was discovered in 1736 and resulted in a minor rush dent sources dating from the 1770s report a silver of the miners into the area.' deposit that picked up the name of "Salero" some­ time in the 1830s, when the area was under The prospecting activities during the time were Mexican colonial occupation. doubtless given a boost during this time by the establishment of military presidios a day or two's In 1781, Teodoro de Croix (1730-1791 ), the com­ ride apart roughly following the present Arizona­ mander of the presidio at Fronteras, reported on the Sonora border. This protection, modest as it was, conditions in the area and suggested the creation of a new presidio at "Ia Estancia de Buenavista." This did not offer much help for those to the north of the present international border in Santa Cruz County, was to be a mile or two south of the present inter­ Arizona. These garrisons included Fronteras national border, about seven miles east of Nogales (1701), Terrenate (1741), Tubac (1752), and Altar "on a large mesa, along the base of which flows the (1752). Rio de Santa Maria." He noted that "four [leagues] to the northwest is the Sierra de Ia Chihuahuilla, The Franciscan Period: 1768 to second in riches and known minerals," and also 1820 mentions the "pass of Ia Plomosa." "Chihuahuilla" would likely be Mount Benedict and Plomosa, as The expulsion of the Jesuit Order by the King of noted previously, would be the Mowry Mine. Spain in 1767 created a spiritual vacuum in the Patagonia Districts for more then a year until their The real colonialization of the Patagonia Districts Franciscan replacements began to arrive to take over. began in the later stages of the Spanish colonial era The Patagonia Area Mining Districts 55 with the issuance of land grants by the Spanish ing less-desirable cuts of meat when butchering and crown. The first grants of the district included the "overlooking" the killing of occasional livestock. Nogales de Elias Grant, initiated in 1741, which The Spanish presidio system had finally taken hold extended into the United States for three miles;2 the in the late 1790s and groups of Indians who were San Jose de Sonoita Grant, initiated in 1754, some not at peace with the settlers were targeted for mil­ nine miles long and a mile wide along the Sonoita itary action; once peace was sued for, these groups Creek, and the Otero Grants at Tubac initiated in were relocated to settlements near the established 1789.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network
    Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network Kim Vacariu Wildlands Project, Tucson, AZ Abstract—One of the greatest challenges facing conservationists in the Sky Islands region is finding a realistic means to maintain historic travel routes for wide-ranging species crossing the United States-Mexico border. This challenge is made difficult due to the ongoing efforts by the Federal government to install additional security infrastructure to stem the flood of undocumented immigrants now entering southern Arizona. Existing and proposed fencing, solid steel walls, all- night stadium lighting, vehicle barriers, an immense network of roads, a 24-hour flow of patrol vehicles, and low-level aircraft overflights are creating an impenetrable barrier to trans-border wildlife movement. Creative solutions are needed now. northern Mexico, and the Sky Islands of southeastern Arizona Introduction were maintained. In 2000, the Wildlands Project and regional partner groups, The SIWN CP identified numerous threats to a healthy including the Sky Island Alliance, published a conservation landscape in the Sky Islands, including fragmentation of plan covering more than 10 million acres of valuable wildlife habitat by roads, fences, and subdivisions; loss or extirpation habitat in the Sky Islands ecoregion of southeast Arizona and of numerous species; loss of natural disturbance regimes such southwest New Mexico. The document, known as the Sky as fire; loss of riparian areas, streams, and watersheds; inva- Islands Wildlands Network Conservation Plan (SIWN CP), is sion by exotic species; and loss of native forests to logging based on the basic tenets of conservation biology, and a sci- and other development.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By FRANK S. SIMONS MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Descriptive stratigraphy of Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous rocks that are mainly rhyolites but that include some sedimentary rocks and intermediate volcanic rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1205 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract El Cretaceous rocks . E13 Introduction 1 Bisbee Formation . .. 13 Triassic and Jurassic rocks... ... ... ... 2 Fossils and age. _....... 16 Canelo Hills Volcanics. ... ... 2 Volcanic rocks of lower Alum Gulch 16 Triassic or Jurassic rocks ._- . 3 Volcanic rocks of Dove Canyon.. 17 Volcanic rocks in the southern Patagonia Trachyandesite of Meadow Valley 18 Mountains ... __ __ . .... 3 Tuff and shale.... ... ..... 18 UX Ranch block . 3 Thin lava flows 19 Duquesne block.........._ ..... .. ...... 3 Thick lava flows 20 Corral Canyon block..... _ . .. 6 Chemical composition 20 Volcaniclastic sequence . .._ . 6 Alteration of trachyandesitic lavas. ... 20 Volcanic sequence.. .._. 7 Age .. - - 21 American Mine block. .._ 8 Cretaceous or Tertiary rocks ... ......... 21 Thunder Mine block _ 9 Volcanic rocks of the Humboldt Chemical composition... ....... ....... 9 mine-Trench Camp area ... ... 21 Age and correlation.. 10 Volcanic rocks of Red Mountain 22 Volcanic and sedimentary rocks References cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By Frederick T. Graybeal, Lorre A. Moyer, Peter G. Vikre, Pamela Dunlap, and John C. Wallis Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747) For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Graybeal, F.T., Moyer, L.A., Vikre, P.G., Dunlap, P., and Wallis, J.C., 2015, Geologic map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015– 1023, 10 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:48,000, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151023. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Mountain Islands and Desert Seas
    The Forgotten Flora of la Frontera Thomas R. Van Devender and Ana Lilia Reina Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ Abstract—About 1,500 collections from within 100 kilometers of the Arizona border in Sonora yielded noteworthy records for 164 plants including 44 new species (12 non-native) for Sonora and 12 (six non-native) for Mexico, conservation species, and regional endemics. Many com- mon widespread species were poorly collected. Southern range extensions (120 species) were more numerous than northern extensions (20), although nine potentially occur in Arizona. Non-native species dispersed along highways and escaped from cultivation. The Turkish poppy (Glaucium corniculatum), established near Agua Prieta, may reach Arizona. African buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) and Natal grass (Melinis repens) are rapidly expanding into new, higher elevation areas. Beginning with Howard Gentry, Forrest Shreve, and Ira Introduction Wiggins in the 1930s, botanists from the United States rushed In northeastern Sonora, grassland and Chihuahuan southward to the tantalizing tropical deciduous forests of the desertscrub extend across the border from Arizona and Río Mayo region of southeastern Sonora, the treasures of the New Mexico. Isolated “sky island” mountains support oak Sierra Madre Occidental in eastern Sonora (Gentry 1942; woodlands and pine-oak forests in the Apachean Highlands Martin et al. 1998), or the scenic Sonoran Desert (Shreve and Ecoregion, the northwestern Madrean Archipelago extend- Wiggins 1964). Botanists from Mexico City 2,200 km to the ing northeast of the “mainland” Sierra Madre Occidental. southeast only occasionally visited Sonora. Solis G. (1993) and Finger-like northern extensions of foothills thornscrub lie in Fishbein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Volcanic Rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    87 CORRELATION OF VOLCANIC ROCKS IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA By Otner J. Taylor A study of the volcanic rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, has been tnade through cotnpilation of previous work together with new investigations. These cotnpilations indicate that there are tnany sitnilarities of sequence and structure in the volcanic rocks of the Atascosa Mountains, Tutnacacori Mountains, Santa Rita Mountains, Patagonia Mountains, and Mustang Mountains of Santa Cruz County. The volcanic rocks of the Tucson Mountains to the north of Pitna County also show sitnilarities to the volcanic rocks in the ranges of Santa Cruz County. Previous studies were tnade in the Atascosa and Tutnacacori Mountains by Webb and Coryell (1954). The regional geology of the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains was tnapped by Schraeder (1915) although tnany localized studies have since been tnade by various authors. The geology of the Mustang Mountains was tnapped by Bryant (1951). The Tucson Mountains have been studied principally by Brown (1939) and Kinnison (1958). A stratigraphic colutnn of the volcanic rocks of each range has been construc­ ted. These colutnns are shown on Plate 1. The generalized sequence in each case is: Cretaceous (?) andesite and rhyolite; Tertiary andesite, rhyolite, tuff, rhyolite-latite, and andesite; and Quaternary (?) basalt. The rocks were dated by using the principle of superposition as well as the following hypotheses: the rocks thought to be Cretaceous also are badly faulted and tilted and a pre-Laratnide age is suggested; the rocks thought to be Tertiary are thick and only gently tilted so that a post-Laratnide age is suggested; the upper andesites of this Tertiary sequence are not tilted, and they are probably post-Lower Miocene since they have structural and sequential sitnilarities with the andesites associated with the Lower Miocene Minetta beds and their probable equivalent, the Pantano fortnation; the rocks thought to be Quaternary are rela­ tively undisturbed and they overlie gravels and lake beds thought to be late Pliocene and Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Noteworthy Distributions and Additions in Southwestern Convolvulaceae
    NOTEWORTHY DISTRIBUTIONS AND ADDITIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN CONVOLVULACEAE Daniel F. Austin Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Tucson, AZ 85734 [email protected] ABSTRACT Since 1998 when the Convolvulaceae was published for the Vascular Plants of Arizona, Calystegia sepium ssp. angulata Brummitt and Convolvulus simuans L. M. Perry have been added to the flora and another species, Jacquemontia agrestis (Choisy) Meisner, has been located that had not been found since 1945. Descriptions, keys, and discussions of these are given to place them in the flora. Additionally, these and Dichondra argentea Willdenow, D. brachypoda Wooton & Standley, D. sericea Swartz, Ipomoea aristolochiifolia (Kunth) G. Don, I. cardiophylla A. Gray, I. ×leucantha Jacquin, and I. thurberi A. Gray, with new noteworthy distributions records in the region, are discussed and mapped. All taxa documented by recent collections are illustrated to facilitate identification. DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS AND ADDITIONS TO THE ARIZONA FLORA Three notable disjunct records have been discovered within Arizona since the treatment of the Convolvulaceae was published for the state (Austin 1998a), Calystegia sepium ssp. angulata Brummitt, Convolvulus simulans L.M. Perry and Jacquemontia agrestis (Choisy) Meisner. Additionally, Ipomoea aristolochiifolia (Kunth) G. Don has been found just south of the border in Mexico. All of these are significant disjunctions in the family, but there are others that have been documented for years and little discussed. Although these are not the only disjunctions within the Convolvulaceae in the region, they are representative of floristic patterns in this and other families. The following discussion updates the known status of the Convolvulaceae in Arizona and compares several species to the floras from which they were derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages: Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design Paul Beier, Emily Garding, Daniel Majka 2008 PATAGONIA – SANTA RITA LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, Michael Robinson, Mitch Sternberg, Dr. Robert Harrison, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, Shaula Hedwall, Bill Broyles, Dale Turner, Natasha Kline, Thomas Skinner, David Brown, Jeff Servoss, Janice Pryzbyl, Tim Snow, Lisa Haynes, Don Swann, Trevor Hare, and Martin Lawrence helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark, and Elissa Ostergaard provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., E. Garding, and D. Majka. 2008. Arizona Missing Linkages: Patagonia – Santa Rita Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13, Whetstone Ecosystem Management
    Sierra Vista RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 13- 1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 13-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 13 Whetstone Ecosystem Management Area The Whetstone Mountains are a small, isolated exploration.1 Access to the mountains is limited due to range centrally located in the Coronado National locked gates on private lands that border the Forest. Forest. The Whetstone Ecosystem Management Area The eastern slopes of the Whetstones drain into the (EMA) encompasses 45,023 acres. Elevations range San Pedro River valley just north of the San Pedro from approximately 4,788 feet to 7,711 feet at the Riparian National Conservation Area. The western summit of Apache Peak. The range is located slopes feed the upper Cienega Creek Basin, an approximately seven miles southwest of Benson, important regional source of groundwater recharge Arizona and 13 miles north of Sierra Vista, Arizona. and flood prevention for the community of Tucson. The Whetstone EMA lies closest to the Santa Rita and Cienega Creek also forms an essential part of the Las Huachuca EMAs. The Santa Rita Mountains lie Cienegas National Riparian Conservation Area which southwest of the Whetstones with the Las Cienega harbors the rare vegetative communities of cienegas, Creek National Conservation Area located in the cottonwood-willow riparian forests and sacaton intervening valley. The National Conservation Area is grasslands. The riparian corridors of the San Pedro home to a number of Endangered species including River and Cienega Creek contain stretches of lesser long-nosed bat, southwest willow flycatcher and perennial water that support endangered fish and Gila chub.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Ar Geochronology and Geologic History of Southwestern Arizona and Adjacent Areas
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 201 K-Ar Geochronology and Geologic History of Southwestern Arizona and Adjacent Areas by 2 3 M. Shafiqullah , P.E. Damonl , D.J. Lynch l, S.J. Reynolds , WA. Rehrig , 4 and R.N. Raymond A bstract This paper presents K-Ar ages of 174 samples from 154 localities in southwestern Ari- zona and adjacent areas with a summary of the geologic history. Ages are given for many rock units that had been "dated" previously only by lithologic correlations. These ages establish the timing of the magmatic and tectonic events that created and deformed the rocks. We interpret the older Precambrian history of Arizona as the result of a long-enduring and evolving convergent continental margin with accretion to the southeast at the rate of 2 km/m.y. This process was terminated 1.4 b.y. ago by the intrusion of vast batholiths ex- tending in a northeasterly direction far beyond Arizona. Younger Precambrian rocks ac- cumulated in an epicontinental sea along the trend of the Cordilleran geosyncline. These rocks were intruded by extensive diabase sills that are best preserved in the central moun- tain region. There is no further record of Precambrian magmatism or sedimentation after intrusion of the diabase sills. Some Precambrian K-Ar dates have been reset by the thermal disturbance that accompanied these intrusions. K-Ar ages that fall within the Paleozoic are reset ages and there is no evidence for any Paleozoic magmatism in the region. K-Ar ages of most of the pre-Laramide Mesozoic igneous rocks in the region have been reset by Laramide magmatism but evidence has been found for Early to Late Jurassic magmatism.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico Forest Service Southwestern Region MB-R3-05-15 April 2018 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (such as Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]