DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Resources Inventory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Resources Inventory Report National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Tumacácori National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2011/439 ON THE COVER A rainbow over Mission San José de Tumacácori, one of three missions within Tumacácori National Historical Park. National Park Service photograph by Ed Wittenberg. THIS PAGE Tumacacori Peak looms over Mission San José de Tumacácori in this view to the west. National Park Service photograph. Photographs courtesy Jeremy Moss (Tumacácori NHP) Tumacácori National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2011/439 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 August 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. Printed copies of this report are produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is available from the Geologic Resources Inventory website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/inventory/ gre_publications.cfm) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). Please cite this publication as: Graham, J. 2011. Tumacácori National Historical Park: geologic resources inventory report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2011/439. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 311/109539, August 2011 ii NPS Geologic Resources Division Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... vi Credits ........................................................................................................................................................................ vi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Geologic Resources Inventory ............................................................................................................... 1 Regional Information ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Regional Geologic Setting ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Cultural History ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Geologic Issues .............................................................................................................. 9 Hazardous Waste Issues ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Surface Water Quality and Quantity ............................................................................................................................. 9 Flooding and Debris Flows ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Expansive Clays .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Seismic Activity (Earthquakes) .................................................................................................................................... 11 Groundwater Depletion, Subsidence, and Earth Fissures ............................................................................................. 12 Geologic Features and Processes ................................................................................ 17 Fluvial Features .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Sedimentary Rock Features ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Igneous Rock Features ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Basin and Range Faults .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Basin-and-Range Landscape Features ......................................................................................................................... 18 Paleontological Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Cultural Features and Geologic Connections ............................................................................................................... 19 Geologic History .......................................................................................................... 21 Precambrian (prior to 542 million years ago) ............................................................................................................... 21 Paleozoic Era (542 to 251 million years ago) ............................................................................................................... 21 Mesozoic Era (251 to 65.5 million years ago) .............................................................................................................. 21 Cenozoic Era (the past 65.5 million years) ................................................................................................................... 23 Geologic Map Data ...................................................................................................... 31 Geologic Maps .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Source Maps .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 Geologic GIS Data...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Geologic Map Overview Graphic ................................................................................................................................ 32 Map Unit Properties Table .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Use Constraints .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Geologic Map Overview Graphic ................................................................................ 33 Map Unit Properties Table .......................................................................................... 36 Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 41 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................ 47 Additional References ................................................................................................. 51 Appendix: Scoping Session Participants .................................................................... 52 Attachment 1: Geologic Resources Inventory Products CD TUMA Geologic Resources Inventory Report iii List of Figures Figure 1. Map showing the missions and presidios of the Pimería Alta .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DGM-13 Report(PDF)
    Surficial Geology and Geologic Hazards of the Amado-Tubac area, Santa Cruz and Pima Counties, Arizona Amado and Tubac 7.5’ Quadrangles by Ann Youberg and Walter R. Helmick Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map 13 November, 2001 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 17 pages of text and two 1:24,000 scale geologic maps Research supported by the Arizona Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, under USGS award number #00HQAG0149. INTRODUCTION This report and accompanying maps describe the surficial geology, geomorphology, and geologic hazards of the rapidly developing Amado-Tubac area, south of the Green Valley area. The mapping covers the Amado and Tubac 7 1/2’ quadrangles (Figure 1). The map area is in unincorporated Santa Cruz and southern Pima Counties. It includes much of the southern part of the upper Santa Cruz Valley, between the Santa Rita Mountains on the east and the Tumacacori Mountains on the west. There are several potentially conflicting land use issues in the area covered by these maps. The Santa Rita and Tumacacori mountain ranges are public lands owned by the U.S. Forest Service. Several large ranches are located within the mapping area and are interspersed with state trust lands. Urbanization has occurred, and continues to occur, along the Santa Cruz River and around the communities of Arivaca Junction, Tubac, and Rio Rico, just south of the map area. Many areas of the Santa Rita piedmont have been subdivided and prepared for development, although development remains sparse. This report is intended to enhance our understanding of the surficial geology of the Amado-Tubac area and to aid in assessing and understanding geologic hazards in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001]
    Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Evaluation Report Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation [PW-05-03-D2-001] Area Overview Size and Location: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area (PWA) encompasses 37,330 acres. This area is located in the Tumacacori and Atacosa Mountains, which are part of the Nogales Ranger District of the Coronado National Forest in southeastern Arizona (see Map 4 at the end of this document). The Tumacacori PWA is overlapped by 30,305 acres of the Tumacacori Inventoried Roadless Area, comprising 81 percent of the PWA. Vicinity, Surroundings and Access: The Tumacacori Potential Wilderness Area is approximately 50 miles southeast of Tucson, Arizona. The Tumacacori PWA is centrally located within the mountain range and encompasses an area from Sardina and Tumacacori Peaks at the northern end to Ruby Road at the southern end and from the El Paso Natural Gas Line on the eastern side to Arivaca Lake on its western side. The PWA is adjacent to the Pajarita Wilderness Area, Arivaca Lake and Peña Blanca Lake. Both Pena Blanca and Arivaca Lakes are managed by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. Interstate 19 (I-19) connects the Tucson metropolitan area to the City of Nogales and the incorporated community of Sahuarita. The unincorporated communities of Green Valley, Arivaca Junction-Amado, Tubac, Tumacacori-Carmen and Rio Rico, Arizona and Sonora, Mexico are within close proximity to the eastern side of the Tumacacori Mountains and the PWA. State Highway 289 provides access from I-19 across private and National Forest System lands into the Tumacacori Ecosystem Management Area to Peña Blanca Lake and Ruby Road (NFS Road 39).
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network
    Threats to Cross-Border Wildlife Linkages in the Sky Islands Wildlands Network Kim Vacariu Wildlands Project, Tucson, AZ Abstract—One of the greatest challenges facing conservationists in the Sky Islands region is finding a realistic means to maintain historic travel routes for wide-ranging species crossing the United States-Mexico border. This challenge is made difficult due to the ongoing efforts by the Federal government to install additional security infrastructure to stem the flood of undocumented immigrants now entering southern Arizona. Existing and proposed fencing, solid steel walls, all- night stadium lighting, vehicle barriers, an immense network of roads, a 24-hour flow of patrol vehicles, and low-level aircraft overflights are creating an impenetrable barrier to trans-border wildlife movement. Creative solutions are needed now. northern Mexico, and the Sky Islands of southeastern Arizona Introduction were maintained. In 2000, the Wildlands Project and regional partner groups, The SIWN CP identified numerous threats to a healthy including the Sky Island Alliance, published a conservation landscape in the Sky Islands, including fragmentation of plan covering more than 10 million acres of valuable wildlife habitat by roads, fences, and subdivisions; loss or extirpation habitat in the Sky Islands ecoregion of southeast Arizona and of numerous species; loss of natural disturbance regimes such southwest New Mexico. The document, known as the Sky as fire; loss of riparian areas, streams, and watersheds; inva- Islands Wildlands Network Conservation Plan (SIWN CP), is sion by exotic species; and loss of native forests to logging based on the basic tenets of conservation biology, and a sci- and other development.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By FRANK S. SIMONS MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Descriptive stratigraphy of Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous rocks that are mainly rhyolites but that include some sedimentary rocks and intermediate volcanic rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1205 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract El Cretaceous rocks . E13 Introduction 1 Bisbee Formation . .. 13 Triassic and Jurassic rocks... ... ... ... 2 Fossils and age. _....... 16 Canelo Hills Volcanics. ... ... 2 Volcanic rocks of lower Alum Gulch 16 Triassic or Jurassic rocks ._- . 3 Volcanic rocks of Dove Canyon.. 17 Volcanic rocks in the southern Patagonia Trachyandesite of Meadow Valley 18 Mountains ... __ __ . .... 3 Tuff and shale.... ... ..... 18 UX Ranch block . 3 Thin lava flows 19 Duquesne block.........._ ..... .. ...... 3 Thick lava flows 20 Corral Canyon block..... _ . .. 6 Chemical composition 20 Volcaniclastic sequence . .._ . 6 Alteration of trachyandesitic lavas. ... 20 Volcanic sequence.. .._. 7 Age .. - - 21 American Mine block. .._ 8 Cretaceous or Tertiary rocks ... ......... 21 Thunder Mine block _ 9 Volcanic rocks of the Humboldt Chemical composition... ....... ....... 9 mine-Trench Camp area ... ... 21 Age and correlation.. 10 Volcanic rocks of Red Mountain 22 Volcanic and sedimentary rocks References cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By Frederick T. Graybeal, Lorre A. Moyer, Peter G. Vikre, Pamela Dunlap, and John C. Wallis Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2015–1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747) For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Graybeal, F.T., Moyer, L.A., Vikre, P.G., Dunlap, P., and Wallis, J.C., 2015, Geologic map of the Patagonia Mountains, Santa Cruz County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015– 1023, 10 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:48,000, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151023. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest
    CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Keystone Peak Prescribed Burn Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-AZ-G020-2015-0009-EA 1 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Decision to be Made .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Conformance with Land Use Plan .......................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Scoping and Issues ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.1 Internal Scoping ................................................................................................................................ 12 1.5.2 External Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.5.3 Issues Identified ................................................................................................................................ 12 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat Proposal
    Billing Code 4310-55-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0042] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AX13 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Jaguar AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to designate 1 2 critical habitat for the jaguar (Panthera onca) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, we propose to designate as critical habitat approximately 339,220 hectares (838,232 acres) in Pima, Santa Cruz, and Cochise Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search field, enter Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012– 0042, which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then click on the Search button. You may submit a comment by clicking on “Comment Now!” (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–ES–2012–0042; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Mountain Islands and Desert Seas
    The Forgotten Flora of la Frontera Thomas R. Van Devender and Ana Lilia Reina Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ Abstract—About 1,500 collections from within 100 kilometers of the Arizona border in Sonora yielded noteworthy records for 164 plants including 44 new species (12 non-native) for Sonora and 12 (six non-native) for Mexico, conservation species, and regional endemics. Many com- mon widespread species were poorly collected. Southern range extensions (120 species) were more numerous than northern extensions (20), although nine potentially occur in Arizona. Non-native species dispersed along highways and escaped from cultivation. The Turkish poppy (Glaucium corniculatum), established near Agua Prieta, may reach Arizona. African buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare) and Natal grass (Melinis repens) are rapidly expanding into new, higher elevation areas. Beginning with Howard Gentry, Forrest Shreve, and Ira Introduction Wiggins in the 1930s, botanists from the United States rushed In northeastern Sonora, grassland and Chihuahuan southward to the tantalizing tropical deciduous forests of the desertscrub extend across the border from Arizona and Río Mayo region of southeastern Sonora, the treasures of the New Mexico. Isolated “sky island” mountains support oak Sierra Madre Occidental in eastern Sonora (Gentry 1942; woodlands and pine-oak forests in the Apachean Highlands Martin et al. 1998), or the scenic Sonoran Desert (Shreve and Ecoregion, the northwestern Madrean Archipelago extend- Wiggins 1964). Botanists from Mexico City 2,200 km to the ing northeast of the “mainland” Sierra Madre Occidental. southeast only occasionally visited Sonora. Solis G. (1993) and Finger-like northern extensions of foothills thornscrub lie in Fishbein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19760011108 2020-03-22T16:23:33+00:00Z General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) ^ t ^ SITE EVALUATION FOR LASER N SATELLITE-TRACKING STATIONS N. H. MAO and R. A. MOHR (NASA-CR-146427) SITE EVALUATION FOR LASER N76-18196 SATELLITE - TRACKING STATIONS ( Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) 131 p HC $6.00 CSCL 14B Unclas G3/14 20043 v .............. ...:..:..:..:.... MAR 1978 rt' c7j` RECEIVED r - NASA STI FACILITY j INPUT BRANCH \ ,r r. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory SPECIAL REPORT 371 I Research in Space Science SAO Special Report No. 371 SITE EVALUATION FOR LASER SATELLITE-TRACKING STATIONS N. K. Mao and P. A. Mohr February 6, 1976 Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page It ABSTRACT ........................................................ vii I 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Patagonia Area Mining Districts, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1530
    Chapter 3 THE PATAGONIA AREA MINING DISTRICTS, Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1539-1930 © 1998 Robert Lenon The Patagonia Mining Districts, for purposes of this worked by Indians because of the number of worn­ article are defined as the area lying within 20 miles out or broken stone hammers found at the site. of the Town of Patagonia and within what is now Similar evidence exists in the Salero-Alto vicinity Santa Cruz County, Arizona. Local custom and in the Tyndall District. The author has also observed usage has divided this region into eight mining dis­ an irregular shallow pit in the extreme southeast tricts: The Santa Rita Mountains and its foothills comer of Pima County, excavating a narrow veinlet are included within the Greaterville, Tyndall, Aztec of azurite-chrysocolla that appeared to have been and Wrightson Mining Districts, and then, begin­ explored by primitive means. This inference was ning with the Nogales District encompassing the strengthened, although not necessarily confirmed, area around Mt. Benedict northeast of Nogales, by the presence of a lone flint arrowhead found in a Arizona, and proceeding east, one then finds the dump alongside the pit. Patagonia, Harshaw and Red Rock Mining Districts. All but the Nogales District have been for­ The earliest European traveler was probably the mally organized (mostly during the 1870s) follow­ Franciscan monk, Marcos de Niza, who traversed ing the procedures permitted under the federal min­ the San Pedro Valley twice in 1539 and then guided ing laws. the party of Francisco Vasquez de Coronado north­ ward along the San Pedro, which they called the The Town of Patagonia lies barely inside the "Nexpa," in search of the fabled Seven Cities of northerly limits of the Harshaw District, some Clbola in the spring of 1540.
    [Show full text]