Seminar in Ethnology Kimber Haddix Mckay, Professor

46763 Social Anthropology Kimber Haddix McKay

Anthropology 430 213 Social Sciences

T/R 11:10-12:30 Office hours: Tues 8:30am- 11am

Spring 2015 [email protected]

Course Description:

Anthropology 430 is a course for advanced students of socio-cultural anthropology. The class is designed to give students the opportunity to read and carefully analyze some first-rate written and visual ethnographies presented from differing theoretical, methodological and pedagogical points of view. Each of these ethnographies has a distinct purpose and set of goals. Students will choose some of these ethnographies to closely examine, and will write papers and present their analyses in class. We will also compare and contrast written and film ethnography to examine the merits of each.

Texts:

Nancy Scheper Hughes Saints, Scholars and Schizophrenics U Cal Press 2001 Paul Rabinow Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco U Cal Press 1978 Lee Cronk From Mukogodo to Maasai Westview 2004 Geoff Childs Tibetan Diary: From Birth to Death and Beyond U Cal Press 2004 Jennifer Johnson-Hanks Uncertain Honor: Modern Motherhood in an African U Chicago Press 2006 Crisis

Papers posted on Moodle.

Grading:

Regular, active and enthusiastic participation in-class discussions of ethnographies (50%) 3 papers analyzing ethnographic works (50%) Grad increment: Scholarly paper, edited post-writing center treatment, analyzing one of the ethnographies; due April 21.

Outcomes:

Students completing this course will achieve the following  Read five important classic and recent ethnographies and watch 6 short ethnographic films  Analyze the ethnographies on the basis of their theoretical approach, methodology, and chief strengths and weaknesses  Present analysis in both oral and written formats  Work on papers with the assistance of the UM Writing Center Participation:

Generally speaking:

You will arrive prepared for a discussion of the day’s readings with notes that define core arguments, themes, concepts and terminologies central to the assigned readings. On Thursday night by midnight, you will upload one carefully constructed question to the Moodle discussion site for the class, in preparation for the week’s discussion. You will be graded on these questions (they will constitute part of your ‘participation’ score).

Class facilitation:

Each week, one team of you will lead the class (discussion “leaders”), while another (discussion “enrichers”) will present the class with information from an extra (your choice) paper germane to the themes for the week. Plan to use Powerpoint. Discussion leaders and enrichers will coordinate before class. The leaders will incorporate what they consider to be the richest/most provocative questions posed by the other members of the seminar on the Moodle discussion board. The discussion of the readings should be oriented around some of the following points:

. Who is the author? What is their academic background and what is their current position? What are their other scholarly interests and/or achievements? . What is the central argument in the section of the ethnography we read this week? From what position of authority does the author address this problem? . What seminal works are cited? In what ways is the author or film editor in dialogue with their critics/colleagues, or is the matter of differing interpretation/analysis/evidence absent or avoided? What questions are left unanswered? . Finally, how does this work articulate with, clarify, or challenge works we have read (or films we have seen) in earlier weeks?

Plagiarism and misconduct: Honesty is required. Students found cheating, plagiarizing, “patch writing” (writing by taking phrases or sections copied from a variety of sources, linked together with your words), or giving false excuses will be dealt with strictly. If you are unfamiliar with college expectations, please start with this webpage. Academic misconduct in this class will be subject to an academic penalty (up to receiving a failing grade in this class) and/or a disciplinary sanction by the University. All students need to be familiar with the Student Conduct Code.

Disabilities Services: Students with disabilities will receive reasonable accommodations in this online course. To request course modifications, please contact me as soon as possible. I will work with you and Disability Services in the accommodation process. For more information, visit the Disability Services website at http://www.umt.edu/dss/ or call 406.243.2243 (Voice/Text).

Some additional themes that might help you structure your consideration of the texts and films, as well as your preparation for seminar:

Who gives this person authority? Does the author convince you that their perception and record of the situation is reliable? How did they do this? More generally speaking, how are you planning to craft yourself as an expert? Bearing in mind there is nothing wrong with owning this label… Own it! “Us” versus “the other.” Humans seem to gravitate toward thinking/ideas that allow them to construct a social reality that includes a dichotomy between their own group (“us”), and other groups (“the other”). Is this juxtaposition implicitly or explicitly defined in this work? And how does the anthropologist/ethnographer go about setting up a disciplinary/academic “us” vs. “other”? Is this useful? Is the theory useful to address ethnographic realities? In this work, how has anthropological theory shaped our discipline’s understanding of particular social problems? In what ways do you think this is useful, or has it clouded the exercise? Who influenced this ethnographer? What genealogy of anthropological concepts, methods, and analytical frameworks can you see at play here? How did the author add to existing scholarship?

And finally, some guidelines for analyzing the books and films:

1. Identify and analyze the theoretical framework utilized in the ethnography. What is the context of this framework within anthropology, as presented by the author? How is the theoretical framework utilized in the ethnography? 2. What is the main argument presented in the ethnography? Describe in detail, using examples from the text. 3. How does the author organize the ethnography? What literary devices are employed? Are statistics and/or quantitative data used? How? What do they convey? 4. Choose 3 distinguished writing samples from the ethnography to share during your in-class presentation. Include this in a section in your paper. 5. Choose 3 examples the author uses to present data to share during your in-class presentation. Include this in a section in your paper. 6. Describe what reading this ethnography has taught you as you contemplate authoring a book or paper based on your own fieldwork. In the oral presentation this can be brief but in your paper it should be thoughtful and lengthy. Use examples.

Schedule: Week/Date Topic/Reading: Have ready: 1

Jan 27/29 Description of class, review of syllabus, start to chart Your ears and mind out the presentation schedule

The influence of theory on ethnography and the KHM will do presentation and importance of training and theoretical background discussion leadership

Feb 3/5 Rabinow, 1st ½ Come prepared to discuss Rabinow, first 1/2

Leaders: Enrichers:

3 Come prepared to discuss Feb 10/12 Rabinow, 2nd ½ Rabinow, second 1/2

Leaders: Enrichers:

4 Scheper-Hughes, 1st ½ Come prepared to discuss Feb 17/19 Scheper-Hughes first 1/2. Visit from Jacob Hansen, UM Writing Center Leaders: Enrichers: 5 Come prepared to discuss Feb 24/26 Scheper-Hughes, 2nd ½ Scheper-Hughes second 1/2.

Tuesday: Paper #1 due for peer review (on Rabinow Leaders: or Scheper-Hughes) Enrichers: Thursday: Paper #1 due to KHM

6 Films #1 and #2: Himalaya and Learning from Ladakh Moodle: Shohat and Stam 2002, March 3/5 Damai 2007, Bauer 2004 Childs, 1st ½

7 Come prepared to discuss Childs March 10/12 Childs 2nd ½ Leaders: Enrichers:

8 Cronk 1st ½ Cronk 1st ½ March 17/19 Leaders: Enrichers:

9 No Class – KHM at conferences – students to meet with March 24/26 instructors at the Writing Ctr on campus about Paper #2

Tuesday: Paper #2 due for peer review (on Himalaya and Learning from Ladakh) Thursday: Paper #2 due to KHM

March 31 Spring Break

10 Films #3, #4 and #5: Kenya, Where Women Rule, A Cronk 2nd ½ Wife Among Wives, and Womanhood and Circumcision April 7/9 Cronk 2nd ½ Moodle: Martinez 1995

12 Come prepared to discuss Johnson April 14/16 Johnson Hanks 1st ½ Hanks 1st ½

Leaders: Enrichers:

13 Johnson Hanks 2nd ½ Come prepared to discuss Johnson April 21 Hanks 2nd ½

Leaders: Enrichers: 14

April 28/30 Film #6: Monday’s Girls Moodle: Heider 2006

Tuesday: Paper #3 due for peer review (on Martinez and Kenya, Where Women Rule, A Leaders: Wife Among Wives, and Womanhood and Enrichers: Circumcision) Thursday: Paper #3 due to KHM

May 5/7 Discussion of class themes, review paper #3, class evaluations

May 14 Final Exam Period: 8:30am Thursday May 14 Topic: Monday’s Girls and Heider (2006)