DOCSLIB.ORG

Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery Food Certification International Ltd Findhorn House Dochfour Business Centre Dochgarroch Inverness, IV3 8GY United Kingdom T: +44(0)1463 223 039 F: +44(0)1463 246 380 www.foodcertint.com MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery Public Certification Report January 2015 Prepared For: Aker BioMarine Antarctic Prepared By: Food Certification International Ltd Food Certification International Public Certification Report Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery Public Certification Report November 2014 Authors: Geir Hønneland, Lucia Revenga and Andrew I. L. Payne Certification Body: Client: Food Certification International Ltd Aker BioMarine Antarctic Address: Address: Findhorn House Aker BioMarine Dochfour Business Centre Oslo Dochgarroch Norway Inverness IV3 8GY Scotland, UK Name: Fisheries Department Name: Sigve Nordrum Tel: +44(0) 1463 223 039 Tel: +47 916 30 188 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.foodcertint.com i version 2.0 (01/06/13) Food Certification International Public Certification Report Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................ iv 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Assessment Team .................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Peer Reviewers ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 RBF Training .......................................................................................................................... 8 3. Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Unit(s) of Certification and scope of certification sought ......................................................... 9 3.2 Overview of the fishery ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2.1 Aker BioMarine Antarctic........................................................................................................ 9 3.2.2 Species and Fishing Practice ............................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Administrative Framework.................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background .......................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Krill biology, life history, ecology and population dynamics ................................................. 12 3.3.2 Krill stock status ................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.3 The fishery ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................. 24 3.4.1 Retained catch ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Bycatch................................................................................................................................. 27 3.4.3 ETP Species ........................................................................................................................ 32 3.4.4 Habitats ................................................................................................................................ 34 3.4.5 Ecosystem ............................................................................................................................ 37 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background.............................................................. 43 3.5.1 Jurisdiction and management system .................................................................................. 43 3.5.2 Interest groups and consultation processes ........................................................................ 44 3.5.3 Objectives and regulation measures .................................................................................... 44 3.5.4 Monitoring, control and surveillance .................................................................................... 45 3.5.5 Research plan and reviews .................................................................................................. 45 4. Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................................. 47 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ......................................................................................... 47 4.1.1 Harmonisation Details .......................................................................................................... 47 4.2 Previous assessments .......................................................................................................... 47 4.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 47 4.3.1 Assessment Tree ................................................................................................................. 47 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ................................................................................. 47 4.4.1 Site Visits.............................................................................................................................. 47 4.4.2 Consultations ....................................................................................................................... 48 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ......................................................................................................... 49 ii version 2.0 (01/06/13) Food Certification International Public Certification Report Aker Biomarine Antarctic Krill Fishery 5. Traceability .................................................................................................................................. 51 5.1 Eligibility Date ........................................................................................................................ 51 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ............................................................................................... 51 5.2.1 Description of Tracking, Tracing and Segregation Systems within the Fishery and Management systems in place relating to Traceability ................................................................. 51 5.2.2 Evaluation of the Risk of Vessels Fishing Outside of UoC .................................................. 51 5.2.3 Risk of Substitution of Mixing Certified / Non-Certified Catch prior to point of landing ........ 51 5.2.4 At-Sea Processing ............................................................................................................... 52 5.2.5 Transshipment ..................................................................................................................... 52 5.2.6 Robustness of management systems relating to traceability ............................................... 52 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................... 52 5.3.1 Eligible points of landing ...................................................................................................... 52 5.3.2 Parties eligible to use the fishery certificate ......................................................................... 52 6. Evaluation Results ...................................................................................................................... 53 6.1 Principle Level Scores ........................................................................................................... 53 6.2 Summary of Scores ............................................................................................................... 53 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 54 6.3.1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 54 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement .................................................................... 54 7. References ................................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix 1. Scoring & Rationale ...................................................................................................... 62 Appendix 1a – MSC Principles & Criteria .......................................................................................... 62 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................................. 65 Appendix 1.2 Conditions ................................................................................................................. 126 Appendix 2. Peer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Balaenoptera Bonaerensis – Antarctic Minke Whale
    Balaenoptera bonaerensis – Antarctic Minke Whale compared to B. bonaerensis. This smaller form, termed the “Dwarf” Minke Whale, may be genetically different from B. bonaerensis, and more closely related to the North Pacific Minke Whales, and thus has been classified B. acutorostrata (Wada et al. 1991; IWC 2001). This taxonomic position, although somewhat controversial, has been accepted by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). Assessment Rationale The current IWC global estimate of abundance of Antarctic Dr. Meike Scheidat Minke Whales is about 500,000 individuals. The abundance estimates declined from about 700,000 for the second circumpolar set of abundance survey cruises Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* (1985/86 to 1990/91) to about 500,000 for the third National Red List status (2004) Least Concern (1991/92 to 2003/04). Although this decline was not statistically significant, the IWC Scientific Committee does Reasons for change No change consider these results to reflect a change. However, Global Red List status (2008) Data Deficient whether this change is genuine or attributed to greater proportions of pack ice limiting the survey extent, has not TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None yet been determined. More detailed results from an CITES listing (1986) Appendix I assessment model are available for the mid-Indian to the mid-Pacific region, and suggest that the population Endemic No increased to a peak in 1970 and then declined, with it *Watch-list Data being unclear whether this decline has levelled off or is still continuing past 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Association Between Hotspots of Baleen Whales and Demographic Patterns of Antarctic Krill Euphausia Superba Suggests Size-Dependent Predation
    Vol. 405: 255–269, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 29 doi: 10.3354/meps08513 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Spatial association between hotspots of baleen whales and demographic patterns of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba suggests size-dependent predation Jarrod A. Santora1, 2,*, Christian S. Reiss2, Valerie J. Loeb3, Richard R. Veit4 1Farallon Institute for Advanced Ecosystem Research, PO Box 750756, Petaluma, California 94952, USA 2Antarctic Ecosystem Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 3333 Torrey Pines Ct., La Jolla, California 92037, USA 3Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, California 95039, USA 4Biology Department, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, 2800 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York 10314, USA ABSTRACT: We examined the spatial association between baleen whales and their principal prey, Antarctic krill Euphausia superba near the South Shetland Islands (Antarctic Peninsula) using data collected by the US Antarctic Marine Living Resources (AMLR) program during January surveys from 2003 through 2007. Whale distributions were determined using ship-based visual surveys, while data on krill distribution, abundance, and demographic characteristics were derived from net hauls. Approximately 25 000 km of transects and 500 net hauls were sampled over 5 yr. We defined hotspots based on statistical criteria to describe persistent areas of occurrence of both whales and krill. Hotspots were identified, and whales and krill length-maturity classes exhibited distinct spatial seg- regation in their distribution patterns. We found that baleen whales aggregated to krill hotspots that differed in size structure. Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae were associated with small (<35 mm) juvenile krill in Bransfield Strait, whereas fin whales Balaenoptera physalus were associ- ated with large (>45 mm) mature krill located offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Krill Divide: Understanding Cross-Sector Objectives for Krill Fishing and Conservation
    Bridging the Krill Divide: Understanding Cross-Sector Objectives for Krill Fishing and Conservation Report of an ICED-BAS-WWF workshop on UNDERSTANDING THE OBJECTIVES FOR KRILL FISHING AND CONSERVATION IN THE SCOTIA SEA AND ANTARCTIC PENINSULA REGION held at WWF’s Living Planet Centre, Woking, UK on 9th & 10th June 2014 Report compiled and edited by: Simeon Hill, Rachel Cavanagh, Cheryl Knowland, Susie Grant and Rod Downie Integrating Climate and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Southern Ocean Bridging the Krill Divide: Understanding Cross-Sector Objectives for Krill Fishing and Conservation SUMMARY In June 2014, the ICED programme, the British need to increase catch limits. Participants also agreed Antarctic Survey and WWF co-hosted a two day that the objectives of management must include a workshop entitled “Understanding the objectives for healthy krill stock and a healthy ecosystem. However, krill fishing and conservation in the Scotia Sea and they were not able to define ecosystem states that Antarctic Peninsula region” which involved participants are desirable or healthy. This reflects the gaps in the from the science, conservation, and fishing industry currently available information and the indirect nature sectors. The workshop used structured dialogue, led of the links between the krill-based ecosystem and by an independent facilitator, to explore each sector’s human well being. The workshop produced a range of objectives and information requirements for the krill- recommendations including the need to articulate a based ecosystem and to identify constructive ways for clear research and development strategy to support the three sectors to work together. The issue of krill progress in the management of the krill fishery, and fishing has previously provoked passionate debate but to improve communication between the Commission participants in this workshop showed broad cross- for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living sector accord.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding and Energy Budgets of Larval Antarctic Krill Euphausia Superba in Summer
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 257: 167–177, 2003 Published August 7 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Feeding and energy budgets of larval Antarctic krill Euphausia superba in summer Bettina Meyer1,*, Angus Atkinson2, Bodo Blume1, Ulrich V. Bathmann1 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Pelagic Ecosystems, Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom ABSTRACT: The physiological condition and feeding activity of the dominant larval stages of Eu- phausia superba (calyptopis stage III, furcilia stages I and II) were investigated from February to March 2000 at the Rothera Time Series monitoring station (67° 34’ S, 68° 07’ W, Adelaide Island, West- ern Antarctic Peninsula). A dense phytoplankton bloom (5 to 25 µg chl a l–1) occupied the mixed layer throughout the study period. The feeding of larvae was measured by incubating the animals in natural seawater. Food concentrations ranged from 102 to 518 µg C l–1 across experiments, and the mean daily C rations were 28% body C for calyptosis stage III (CIII), 25% for furcilia stage I (FI) and 15% for FII. The phytoplankton, dominated by diatoms and motile prey taxa, ranged from 8 to 79 µm in size. Across this size spectrum of diatoms, CIII cleared small cells most efficiently, as did FI to a lesser degree. FII, however, showed no clear tendency for a specific cell size. Across the measured size spectrum of the motile taxa, all larvae stages showed a clear preference towards the larger cells. Estimated C assimi- lation efficiencies were high, from 70 to 92% (mean 84%).
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Feeding Aggregations of Fin Whales Off Elephant Island (Antarctica)
    SC/64/SH9 Fall feeding aggregations of fin whales off Elephant Island (Antarctica) BURKHARDT, ELKE* AND LANFREDI, CATERINA ** * Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 256678 Bremerhaven, Germany ** Politecnico di Milano, University of Technology, DIIAR Environmental Engineering Division Pza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy Abstract From 13 March to 09 April 2012 Germany conducted a fisheries survey on board RV Polarstern in the Scotia Sea (Elephant Island - South Shetland Island - Joinville Island area) under the auspices of CCAMLR. During this expedition, ANT-XXVIII/4, an opportunistic marine mammal survey was carried out. Data were collected for 26 days along the externally preset cruise track, resulting in 295 hrs on effort. Within the study area 248 sightings were collected, including three different species of baleen whales, fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), humpback whale ( Megaptera novaeangliae ), and Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis ) and one toothed whale species, killer whale ( Orcinus orca ). More than 62% of the sightings recorded were fin whales (155 sightings) which were mainly related to the Elephant Island area (116 sightings). Usual group sizes of the total fin whale sightings ranged from one to five individuals, also including young animals associated with adults during some encounters. Larger groups of more than 20 whales, and on two occasions more than 100 individuals, were observed as well. These large pods of fin whales were observed feeding in shallow waters (< 300 m) on the north-western shelf off Elephant Island, concordant with large aggregations of Antarctic krill ( Euphausia superba ). This observation suggests that Elephant Island constitutes an important feeding area for fin whales in early austral fall, with possible implications regarding the regulation of (krill) fisheries in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs
    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Monitoring and Control of the Krill Fishery
    CCAMLR-XXV/BG xx October 2006 Original: English Agenda Item 4, 7 & 10 IMPROVING MONITORING AND CONTROL OF THE KRILL FISHERY THE ANTARCTIC AND SOUTHERN OCEAN COALITION (ASOC) _______________ This paper is presented for consideration by CCAMLR and may contain unpublished data, analyses, and/or conclusions subject to change. Data contained in this paper should not be cited or used for purposes other than the work of the CCAMLR Commission, Scientific Committee, or their subsidiary bodies without the permission of the originators/owners of the data. IMPROVING MONITORING AND CONTROL OF THE KRILL FISHERY I. Introduction – CCAMLR and krill Ecosystem management of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) is a central task for CCAMLR. The Scientific Committee, through its Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring and Management (WG- EMM), is developing management procedures on krill aimed at ensuring that ecological relationships between harvested, dependent and related populations are maintained, according to Article II 3 (b) of the Convention. In addition, CCAMLR’s Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP) provides information on the status of the different components of the ecosystem to be incorporated into these management procedures. Regrettably, the quality and magnitude of CCAMLR’s scientific work on krill is rarely matched by action at the Commission level to provide the necessary tools to allow adequate monitoring and control of the fishery. A review of the reports of the Scientific Committee and the Commission from the past thirteen years has been recently conducted in order to assess the profile of krill-related discussions in their respective agendas. Discussions of krill and toothfish (Dissostichus spp.), currently the highest profile species under CCAMLR management, were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNOUNCEMENTS Breaking News – Postponement of ICWL 2020
    VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE ANNOUNCEMENTS Breaking News – Postponement of ICWL 2020 12th International Conference and Workshop on Lobster Biology and Management (ICWL) 18-23 October 2020 in Fremantle, Western Australia The Organising Committee of the 12th ICWL workshop met on the 31 March 2020 and decided to postpone the workshop to next year due to the Covid-19 outbreak around the world. Please check the website (https://icwl2020.com.au/) for updates as we determine the timing of the next conference. The World Fisheries Congress which was planned for 11-15 October 2020 in Adelaide, South Australia (wfc2020.com.au) has also been postponed to 2021. The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the Western Rock Lobster (WRL) council were looking forward to hosting scientists, managers and industry participants in Western Australia in 2020. However we are committed to having the conference in September / October 2021. Don’t hesitate to contact us or the conference organisers, Arinex, if you have any questions. Please stay safe and we look forward to seeing you in 2021. Co-hosts of the workshop Nick Caputi Nic Sofoulis DPIRD ([email protected]) WRL ([email protected]) The Lobster Newsletter Volume 33, Number 1: March 2020 1 VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE The Lobster Newsletter Volume 33, Number 1: March 2020 2 VOLUME THIRTY THREE MARCH 2020 NUMBER ONE The Natural History of the Crustacea 9: Fisheries and Aquaculture Edited by Gustavo Lovrich and Martin Thiel This is the ninth volume of the ten-volume series on The Natural History of the Crustacea published by Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Distribution and Demography of Antarctic Krill Euphausia Superba Dana, 1852 (Euphausiacea) at the South Orkney Islands, 2011–2015
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 23, 2019 Summer distribution and demography of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, 1852 (Euphausiacea) at the South Orkney Islands, 2011–2015 Krafft, Bjørn A.; Krag, Ludvig Ahm; Knutsen, Tor; Skaret, Georg; Jensen, Knut H. M.; Krakstad, Jens O.; Larsen, Stuart H.; Melle, Webjørn; Iversen, Svein A.; Godø, Olav R. Published in: Journal of Crustacean Biology Link to article, DOI: 10.1093/jcbiol/ruy061 Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Krafft, B. A., Krag, L. A., Knutsen, T., Skaret, G., Jensen, K. H. M., Krakstad, J. O., ... Godø, O. R. (2018). Summer distribution and demography of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, 1852 (Euphausiacea) at the South Orkney Islands, 2011–2015. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 38(6), 682-688. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/ruy061 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Antarctic Krill (PDF)
    A fact sheet from Oct 2014 Protecting Antarctic Krill The key to a healthy Southern Ocean Overview Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) are 2½-inch-long zooplankton that form huge swarms in the waters surrounding Antarctica. Although they are tiny, krill play a vital role in supporting the Southern Ocean ecosystem by forming the base of the food web. Krill are plentiful. In fact, scientists believe the total weight of all Antarctic krill is greater than the cumulative weight of any other animal species on the planet. However, the combined effect of concentrated fishing and climate change on krill—especially near the coast of the Antarctic Peninsula—is reducing the availability of krill in the foraging area of species such as chinstrap and Adélie penguins,1 and creating a ripple effect throughout the Antarctic food web.2 Krill are caught by industrial fishing vessels, the most advanced of which vacuum up and process them on board, allowing for a large catch in a short period of time. Krill are used as an ingredient in animal feed for industrial farming and aquaculture, bait for fishing and omega-3 diet supplements for human consumption. Temperatures around the Antarctic Peninsula are rising faster than anywhere on Earth. That is causing a massive reduction in the sea ice that krill cling to and the sea ice algae they feed on. Krill abundance correlates closely with the extent of sea ice coverage from the previous year. The availability of krill during the Antarctic summer is critical to the reproductive success of a wide range of species, including several species of penguins, whales, seals, and other seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability in the Condition of Juvenile Antarctic Krill, Euphausia Superba, at the Western
    Variability in the condition of juvenile Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, at the Western Antarctic Peninsula by Radhika Shah A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Science in Environmental Science (Honors Scholar) March 8, 2019 Commencement June 2019 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Radhika Shah for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Science in Environmental Science presented on March 8, 2019. Title: Variability in the condition of juvenile Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, at the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Abstract approved:_____________________________________________________ Kim Bernard Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, are a highly abundant zooplankton species found in the Southern Ocean. They are a key food choice for higher trophic levels and are important consumers near the base of the food web. Changes to the environment of the Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP), as a result of warming, are altering the marine pelagic ecosystem there. The size of the krill population in the region has decreased significantly over the past 90 years. Krill preferentially select diatoms over other phytoplankton species; however, diatoms are becoming less abundant and are being replaced by cryptophytes and primnesiophytes. Diatoms are an important source of polyunsaturated fatty acids that krill use for growth and development. I investigated whether changes in the abundance of diatoms (using the algal pigment, fucoxanthin, as a proxy) or in sea ice conditions (timing of advance and retreat) were related to the size (dry weight) and condition (caloric content standardized by weight) of juvenile krill. I found that there was a significant positive relationship between caloric content of juvenile krill and their dry weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Win for Wildlife As Krill Fishing Restricted in Antarctica 10 July 2018
    Win for wildlife as krill fishing restricted in Antarctica 10 July 2018 places where they currently operate. "Our members agree that the industry must develop sustainably to ensure long-term viability of the krill stocks and the predators that depend on it," ARK said in a statement. "Today, we are moving forward with a pioneer initiative, implementing voluntary restricted zones for the krill fishery in the Antarctic Peninsula." The shrimp-like crustacean, which is rich in protein, is primarily used in the aquaculture industry although its oil is a popular nutritional supplement. ARK represent 85 percent of the Antarctic krill Antarctica is home to penguins, seals, whales and other fishing industry and conservationists said it was a marine life with krill a staple food for many species significant move. "This is a bold and progressive response from these krill fishing companies, and we hope to see Five major krill fishing firms Tuesday agreed to halt the remainder of the krill industry follow suit," said operations across huge swathes of the Antarctic to Greenpeace spokesman Phil Vine. help protect wildlife in a move hailed as "bold and progressive" by conservationists. "The momentum for protection of the Antarctic's waters and wildlife is snowballing." The vast frozen continent is home to penguins, seals, whales and other marine life with krill a Plans were set out in 2009 to establish a series of staple food for many species. MPAs in the Southern Ocean allowing marine life to migrate between areas for breeding and foraging. But a combination of climate change and industrial- scale fishing has been hitting populations of the But progress has been slow by members of the small crustacean, with potentially disastrous Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources impacts on larger predators.
    [Show full text]