Lepidoptera, Ochsenheimeriidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lepidoptera, Ochsenheimeriidae) Stængelmøllenes udbredelse i Danmark (Lepidoptera, Ochsenheimeriidae) OLE KARSHOL T Karsholt, O.: Distribution of Stem Moths in Denmark (Lepidoptera, Ochsenheimerii­ dae). En t. Meddr 51: 93-96. Copenhagen, Denmark 1984. ISSN 0013-8851. A survey of the distribution of Stem Moths (Ochsenheimeria) occuring in Denmark is given, based on specimens examined by the author. Distribution maps are presented for the four species. Until recently all have been sparsely represented in collections, but according to present knowledge only O. Iaurelia is a rare species here. Records from literature are given in the text, and the occasional occurrence of O. vacculella and taure/la as pest species is discussed. O. Karsholt, Zoologisk Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 København Ø. Stængelmøllene er en lille familie af som­ ne og dels at placere flere navne i synonymi merfugle med kun en slægt, Ochsenheime­ til de fire nedenfor omtalte arter. Disse for­ ria. Der kendes fire arter i Nordeuropa, og skelle er nærmere beskrevet af Karsholt & disse er alle fundet i Danmark. Arterne har Nielsen (i trykken), og heri omtales også den tidligere været meget sammenblandede i bå• specielle indsamlingsteknik for Ochsenhei­ de den danske og udenlandske litteratur. meriidae. Hensigten med denne artikel er at Dette skyldes især, at de som regel kun fan­ redegøre for de specielle forhold vedrørende ges sjældent og enkeltvis, samt den omstæn• Ochsenheimeria arterne i Danmark, som er dighed, at nogle arter udviser betydelige for­ fremkommet ved udarbejdelsen af oven­ skelle mellem kønnene, mens han og hun nævnte artikel. hos andre er næsten ens. I den første danske sommerfuglefortegnel- I de senere år har ikke mindst danske le­ Fig. l. Ochsenheimeria vacculella FR. 13 mm. pidopterologer fanget flere Ochsenheimeria­ arter i antal, hvorved det har været muligt dels at påpege sikre kendetegn mellem arter- 93 se (Haas, 18 74-7 5) omtales kun en art, tau­ forår. Arten er et alvorligt skadedyr på hve­ rella Den. & Schiff. De eksemplarer, Haas de i Sovjetunionen og i USA, hvortil den er nævner, omfatter dog også mediopectinellus indslæbt og først blev fundet i 1964. (Davis, Hw. I tillægget til Haas' liste omtaler Hede­ 1975). Herhjemme er der i 1983 indberettet mann (1894) også kun taurella: »To skader på Rajgræs (Lolium) ved Odense (P. Exempl. paa Murene af et Hus ved Ringe­ Esbjerg, personlig meddelelse). dal, Juli 1893«. Disse har desværre ikke kunnet findes og kontrolbestemmes. Larsen Ochsenheimeria vacculella FR. (1916) opfører foruden taurella for første gang vacculella FR. I tillægget (1927) tilføjes yderligere 2 arter, bisantel/a Zell. og birdel/a Curt. Alle de i tillægget nævnte eksemplarer tilhører dog sidstnævnte art. Desuden omtaler Larsen (1927) under vacculella atter »2 stkr. Ringedal Bornholm (Gudmann)«. Han henviser ikke til eksem­ plarerne fra samme lokalitet, som han anfør­ te under taurella (1916: 138), hvad han gør for eksemplaret fra Maribo ( 1927: 68). På Zoologisk Museum i København findes to eksemplarer af vacculella etiketteret »Ringe­ Fig. 2. Danske findesteder for Ochsenheimeria dal, 7-1895, Gudmann« i C. S. Larsens vacculella FR. håndskrift. Jeg mener imidlertid ikke, at dis­ se eksemplarer er de samme, som Hede­ O. urella Fischer von Roslerstamm, 1842 mann (1894) omtalte som fundet i 1893. (bisontella Lierrig & Zeller, 1846). Fig. 3. Derimod er det overvejende sandsynligt, at Undersøgt 93 dd, 14 99 fra Danmark. Arten de befandt sig i et materiale, som C. S. Lar­ blev først konstateret i Danmark i I 972 i sen anvendte under udarbejdelsen af sit til­ NEJ: Hammer Bakker (E. Traugott-Olsen læg (192 7), og som han regnede med stam­ leg.) og er nu fundet på fire lokaliteter i mede fra Ringedal på Bornholm, juli 1895, NEJ, samt i WJ ved Vind (P. L. Holst leg.) men som vi i dag må anse som fejletiketteret og NEZ: Teglstrup Hegn (K. Schnack leg.). (sml. Karsbolt & Larsen, under udarbej­ Efter at udbredelseskortene var trykt, har jeg delse), og disse dyr kan derfor ikke anvendes set 5 stk. urella fra NEZ: Kongelunden, til faunistiske arbejder. 8. viii. I 983 (K. Schnack leg.). Den er knyttet til tørre steder med Hundegræs (Dactylis Bemærkninger til de enkelte arter glomerata) og andre græsser og kan findes ved først på eftermiddagen at stryge med O. vacculella Fischer von Roslerstamm, nettet disse. Det er vanskeligt at 1842. Fig. 1-2. Undersøgte danske eksem­ plarer: 62 dd, 72 99 samt 76 stk., som ikke Ochsenheimeria kønsbestemtes. Arten synes at have bredt sig urel\a FR. i Danmark i dette århundrede. Det ældste sikre eksemplar er fra NEZ: Grib Skov ved Fredensborg, 1915 (B. G. Rye leg.). Nu er vacculella den almindeligste Ochsenheime­ ria-art i Danmark. Specielt i distrikterne F, LFM og SZ kan den optræde i stort antal. Den synes at være mere fatallig i de nordlige og vestlige distrikter, og den er som omtalt ovenfor ikke med sikkerhed fundet på Born­ holm. Møllene sidder ofte på hvide vægge el­ ler søger ind i lader og udhuse, hvor de op­ holder sig til langt hen på efteråret, og døde Fig. 3. Danske findesteder for Ochsenheimeria eksemplarer kan desuden stadig findes næste urella FR. 94 afgøre, om arten er indvandret til Danmark grebet og er ofte iagttaget her i Landet«. Den for nylig, eller om den blot har været over­ omstændighed, at de danske fund af taurella set. Et eksemplar fra 1929 fra NEJ: Allerup er af ældre dato, og at arten i vore omgivel­ Bakker, hvor de fleste danske urel/a er fan­ ser synes at være blevet sjældnere betyder, at get, tilhører mediopectinellus Hw. det ikke er helt usandsynligt, at det virkelig var taurella, der optrådte som skadedyr i O. mediopectinellus (Haworth, 1828) Danmark i forrige århundrede. Rostrup (birdella Curtis, 1831 ). Fig. 4. U n dersøgt 32 (1907) skriver videre: »l de senere Aar synes M, 15 'i?'i? fra Danmark. Først fundet på F: dette Angreb at være blevet mindre alminde­ Ølstedgård før 1875 (V. Strøm leg.). Arten ligt, ...«. Om denne tilbagegang skyldes er fundet spredt i alle distrikter med undta­ klimaændring eller ændrede dyrkningsfor­ gelse af Bornholm. Den synes dog at være mer, er uvist. De ovennævnte tre danske hyppigst mod vest og syd, hvilket er i over­ taurella er alle fundet af samlere, og der er ensstemmelse med artens samlede udbredel­ ikke bevaret et eneste eksemplar, der kan se. De fleste fund er enkeltfund, men arten dokumentere, at det virkelig var larven af ZOOLOGISK MUSEUM, KØBENHAVN Fig. 4. Danske findesteder for Ochsenheimeria Fig. 5. Danske findesteder for Ochsenheimeria mediopectinellus Hw. taurella Den. & Schiff. er dog enkelte gange fanget i lidt større antal. taurella, som Sofie Rostrup ofte iagttog (det­ Biotoperne er såvel tørre, græsklædte bakker te er venligst undersøgt af prof. Jørgen Jør­ som tørre partier af strandenge. gensen). O. taure/la (Denis & Schiffermiiller, Som nævnt ovenfor har bestemmelsen af 1775). Fig. 5. Undersøgt 3 deJ fra Danmark, vore Ochsenheimeria arter tidligere voldt så alle fra LFM: Nykøbing, 18.viii.1873, leg. store problemer, at vi i dag ikke kan forlade E. Benzon; Maribo ex la. 13.vii.1912, Tjørn os på oplysninger i litteraturen, der ikke kan (?), leg. H. P. S. Sønderup; Hannenov, verificeres ved belægseksemplarer. Dette er 28.vii.l948, leg. J. Lundqvist. Oplysningen mig derfor en kærkommen lejlighed til at om, at eksemplaret fra Maribo muligvis er opfordre alle entomologer, der publicerer klækket fra Tjørn, skyldes utvivlsomt en fejl. deres fund eller iagttagelser, til at sørge for Arten lever i stænglen af Rug (Secale) og at gemme dokumentationsmateriale og med­ måske andre græsser (Gallus, 1865). virke til, at dette bliver opbevaret for efterti­ På trods af, at der kun kendes tre danske den - helst i en offentlig tilgængelig samling. eksemplarer af taurella, har den ry af at være Udarbejdelsen af denne artikel har kun et skadedyr. Rostrup (1907) skriver om været mulig, fordi en række danske lepidop­ Stængelmøllet eller hvidaksmøllet: »Om terologer med sædvanlig velvilje har stillet Foraaret tager de atter fat paa deres Ødelæg• deres materiale til rådighed. Det er derfor gelsesværk, idet de vandrer fra den ene Plan­ med fornøjelse, at jeg takker: E. M. Ander­ te til den anden. Dette Foraarsangreb giver sen, Mesinge; O. Buhl, Odense; K. Greger­ sig tydeligere til Kende end Efteraarsan- sen, København; H. Hendriksen, Allerød; 95 P. L. Holst, Mariager; H. K. Jensen, Hyllin­ Gallus, [?], 1865: Zur Naturgeschichte der ge; K. Jensen, Mørkøv; B. Jørgensen, Få• Ochsenheimeria taurella Wien. Verz., eines der borg; G. Jørgensen, Sorø; J. Lundqvist, Hil­ Landwirthschaft schadlichen lnsects. - Stett. lerød; G. Pallesen, Beder; E. Palm, Føllens­ en t. Ztg. 26: 352-354. lev; E. Raid, København; U. Seneca, Ka­ Hedemann, W. v., 1894: Bidrag til Fortegnelsen over de i Danmark levende Microlepidoptera. - lundborg; K. Schnack, København; og P. Ent. Meddr (1. rk.) 4: 254-289. Skou, Svendborg. Endvidere ønsker jeg at Haas, A. B., 1874-75: Fortegnelse over de i Dan­ takke P. Esbjerg, Institut for Plantepatologi, mark levende Lepidoptera. - Naturhist Tidskr. Lyngby; J. Jørgensen, Den Kongelige Vete­ (3. rk.) 9: 377-567; IO: 1-56. rinær- og Landbohøjskole, København; N. Karsholt, O. & Larsen, K., 1984: Aterpia cortica­ P. Kristensen, Zoologisk Museum, Køben­ na (Den. & Schiff.) og andre sommerfugle meldt havn; E. S. Nielsen, CSIRO, Canberra, fra Ringedal på Bornholm (Lepidoptera). - Ent. Australien og Eivind Palm, Føllenslev for Meddr 52 (under udarbejdelse). oplysninger og anden hjælp i forbindelse Karsholt, O. & Nielsen, E. S., 1984: A taxonomic review of the Stem Moths, Ochsenheimeria med dette arbejde. Hiibner, of Northem Europe (Lepidoptera, Ochsenheimeriidae). - En t. Scand. I 5 (i tryk­ ken). Larsen, C. S., 1916: Fortegnelse over Danmark Litteratur [si c !] Microlepidoptera. - En t. Meddr 17: Davis, D. R., 1975: ReviewofOchsenheimeriidae 28-319. and the introduetion of the Cereal Stem Moth - 1927: Tillæg til Fortegnelse over Danmarks Ochsenheimeria vacculella into the United Sta­ Microlepidoptera.- En t.
Recommended publications
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Any Reader Who Knew the British Butterflies in The
    VOLUME 50, NUMBER 2 ]53 Any reade r who knew the British butterflies in the 1950s and before will have memories of rich localities, of pastures, woods and downland from which once common species have long vanished, even if the land seems superficially to have survved. This book misses no opportunity for optimism, however: a few expanding ranges, of the Essex Skipper (Thymelicl1s lineola), the Speckled Wood (Pararge aegeria), and perhaps the White Admiral (Ladoga camilla), are recorded, together with current conservation efforts to keep now highly restricted and threatened species on the British l.'st. To read this book in conjunction with South or Frohawk reveals the general and rapid decline of a fauna, for long relatively stable, for which the blame lies almost entirely with habitat change and degradation, in their richly varied aspects. The illustrations, by Richard Lewington, have neve r, ill my vi.cw, been surpassed. Each butterfly is shown by an upperside (of both sexes where appreciably dimorphic) in "set" position, and by an underside in "perching" pose. British lepidopterists have for long paid much attention to aberrations, and many very remarkable examples of these variants are shown. Other figures, illustrating the butterflies at rest or nectaring are particularly striking through Lewington's use of black and white pencil for the plart or other perching site, against which the beauty of the painted butterflies is seen to best advantage. The effect achieved, for example, by a mating pair of Black Hairstreaks (Strymonidia pruni) on a penciled blackthorn twig, of a male Purple Hairstreak (Ql1ercl1sia quercus) basking on a an oak twig, or the once widespread but now endange red High Brown Fritillary (Argyrmis adippe) perching on a bramble, selected for the title page, is brilliant.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
    FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • New Lithuanian Records of Moths Captured in Beetle Traps
    EKOLOGIJA. 2010. Vol. 56. No. 3–4. P. 105–109 DOI: 10.2478/v10055-010-0015-7 © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2010 © Lietuvos mokslų akademijos leidykla, 2010 New Lithuanian records of moths captured in beetle traps Henrikas Ostrauskas1, 2*, Moths were captured in multiple funnel traps used to survey xylophagous beetles in nine localities of Lithuania in 2002–2004. A total of 176 moths were caught, representing Povilas Ivinskis2 117 species. Loxostege virescalis (Guenée 1854) was collected at e tokai and is a new record for the Lithuanian fauna. Two very rare Lithuanian moth species, Ochsenheimeria vacculel- 1 State Service of Plant-growing, la Fisher von Röslerstamm 1842 and Spargania luctuata (Denis, Schiff ermüller, 1775), were under the Ministry of Agriculture, trapped at two and one new localities, respectively. In addition, new distribution records Ozo 4A, LT-08200 Vilnius, Lithuania are presented for 10 moth species that are considered to be rare in Lithuania. 2 Nature Research Centre, Key words: traps, Lepidoptera, species distribution, Lithuania Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania INTRODUCTION tre, Lithuania, Table 1) to maximise beetle trap catch. A sur- vey for xylophagous beetles was conducted in nine localities Th e last catalogue of Lithuanian moths was issued six years (Figure). During 2002, one attractant-baited trap per locality ago, and it comprised 2 455 species found in Lithuania (Ivins- was installed. In 2003–2004, the attractant-baited traps were kis, 2004). Moth fauna in Lithuania was studied thoroughly, supplemented with an additional control trap (no attractant) but the following investigations (Kazlauskas, 2006b; Kaz- in each locality. Th e traps were placed 1.5 m above the ground lauskas, Šlėnys, 2007; Paukštė, 2009) provided new impor- on stakes adjacent to stored timber or in truck control posts tant results.
    [Show full text]
  • Microlepidoptera.Hu Redigit: Fazekas Imre
    Microlepidoptera.hu Redigit: Fazekas Imre 5 2012 Microlepidoptera.hu A magyar Microlepidoptera kutatások hírei Hungarian Microlepidoptera News A journal focussed on Hungarian Microlepidopterology Kiadó—Publisher: Regiograf Intézet – Regiograf Institute Szerkesztő – Editor: Fazekas Imre, e‐mail: [email protected] Társszerkesztők – Co‐editors: Pastorális Gábor, e‐mail: [email protected]; Szeőke Kálmán, e‐mail: [email protected] HU ISSN 2062–6738 Microlepidoptera.hu 5: 1–146. http://www.microlepidoptera.hu 2012.12.20. Tartalom – Contents Elterjedés, biológia, Magyarország – Distribution, biology, Hungary Buschmann F.: Kiegészítő adatok Magyarország Zygaenidae faunájához – Additional data Zygaenidae fauna of Hungary (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae) ............................... 3–7 Buschmann F.: Két új Tineidae faj Magyarországról – Two new Tineidae from Hungary (Lepidoptera: Tineidae) ......................................................... 9–12 Buschmann F.: Új adatok az Asalebria geminella (Eversmann, 1844) magyarországi előfordulásához – New data Asalebria geminella (Eversmann, 1844) the occurrence of Hungary (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phycitinae) .................................................................................................. 13–18 Fazekas I.: Adatok Magyarország Pterophoridae faunájának ismeretéhez (12.) Capperia, Gillmeria és Stenoptila fajok új adatai – Data to knowledge of Hungary Pterophoridae Fauna, No. 12. New occurrence of Capperia, Gillmeria and Stenoptilia species (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) ……………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Pests of Cultivated Plants in Finland
    ANNALES AGRICULTURAE FE,NNIAE Maatalouden tutkimuskeskuksen aikakauskirja Vol. 1 1962 Supplementum 1 (English edition) Seria ANIMALIA NOCENTIA N. 5 — Sarja TUHOELÄIMET n:o 5 Reprinted from Acta Entomologica Fennica 19 PESTS OF CULTIVATED PLANTS IN FINLAND NIILO A.VAPPULA Agricultural Research Centre, Department of Pest Investigation, Tikkurila, Finland HELSINKI 1965 ANNALES AGRICULTURAE FENNIAE Maatalouden tutkimuskeskuksen aikakauskirja journal of the Agricultural Researeh Centre TOIMITUSNEUVOSTO JA TOIMITUS EDITORIAL BOARD AND STAFF E. A. jamalainen V. Kanervo K. Multamäki 0. Ring M. Salonen M. Sillanpää J. Säkö V.Vainikainen 0. Valle V. U. Mustonen Päätoimittaja Toimitussihteeri Editor-in-chief Managing editor Ilmestyy 4-6 numeroa vuodessa; ajoittain lisänidoksia Issued as 4-6 numbers yearly and occasional supplements SARJAT— SERIES Agrogeologia, -chimica et -physica — Maaperä, lannoitus ja muokkaus Agricultura — Kasvinviljely Horticultura — Puutarhanviljely Phytopathologia — Kasvitaudit Animalia domestica — Kotieläimet Animalia nocentia — Tuhoeläimet JAKELU JA VAIHTOTI LAUKS ET DISTRIBUTION AND EXCHANGE Maatalouden tutkimuskeskus, kirjasto, Tikkurila Agricultural Research Centre, Library, Tikkurila, Finland ANNALES AGRICULTURAE FENNIAE Maatalouden tutkimuskeskuksen aikakauskirja 1962 Supplementum 1 (English edition) Vol. 1 Seria ANIMALIA NOCENTIA N. 5 — Sarja TUHOELÄIMET n:o 5 Reprinted from Acta Entomologica Fennica 19 PESTS OF CULTIVATED PLANTS IN FINLAND NIILO A. VAPPULA Agricultural Research Centre, Department of Pest Investigation,
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta Britannica
    The date shows when this volume we To renew thisi book couvcopy the call Nc\'o. and g. the librarian. HOME I Cornell University Library QL 561.T7S78 Insecta britannica. 3 1924 018 312 029 INSECTA BRITANNIC A. LEPIDOPTERA: TINEINA. H. T. STAINTON. LONDON: LOVELT, REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1854. Q L-irL( T7S7Z 1*1 IE *f 5" A . 3 V- X 3 WELL [UNlV£tiSJTYI \jJBRArtV^ JOHN EDWARD TAYLOll, PKINTBR, LITTLB QUPIIN STltKKT, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. PREFACE. The object of this volume is to furnish descriptions of all the species of Tineina (a group of Lepidopteua) at present known to inhabit Great Britain, and at the same time to give as much information concerning their habits and transformations as the limited space would allow. Each species is carefully described from actual specimens, and each genus is founded on the micro- scopical investigation of all (or nearly all) the species comprised in it. In some few instances, to avoid a premature multiplication of genera, species are placed in a genus though not quite agreeing with its essential characters; in such cases care has been taken to point out wherein these differences consist, so that, should the further progress of the science require the creation of new genera, this will be facilitated by the details here given. The habits noticed are in most instances the result of personal research, al- though advantage has been taken of the observations of others where there was no doubt to what species they were intended to apply. The transformations of the species, from their great va- riety, offer an endless field of amusement ; and my object being to give full but concise details, general observations thereon are placed at the commencement of each genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management in Relation to Environmental Sustainability
    Integrated pest management in relation to environmental sustainability. Part II. Wheat pest management under the dynamics of agroecological changes in Transylvania Dana Malschi Bioflux Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca 2018 ISBN 978-606-8887-36-4 Dana Malschi * Integrated pest management in relation to environmental sustainability. Part II. Wheat pest management under the dynamics of agroecological changes in Transylvania 1 Integrated pest management in relation to environmental sustainability. Part II. Wheat pest management under the dynamics of agroecological changes in Transylvania Associated Prof. Dr. Dana Malschi with the cooperation of Dr. Eng. Adina Daniela Tărău (Ivaș) Drd. Eng. Ana Maria Vălean (Păcurar) Dr. Eng. Laura Șopterean (Țicudean) Drd. Eng. Ionel Dragoș Dărab Dr. Eng. Rozalia Kadar Dr. Eng. Felicia Chețan Prof. Dr. Eng. Felicia Mureșanu Dr. Eng. Cornel Chețan Dr. Eng. Nicolae Tritean 27 tables, 30 figures, graphics, diagrams, 6 color plats with photos and drawings Agricultural Research and Development Station Turda of the Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Engineering of the Babeş-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca 2018 Bioflux Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca ISBN 978-606-8887-36-4 2 Dana Malschi, 2018 Dr. biologist Dana Malschi, associate professor, researcher 1st degree, Associate member of the Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences Author’s institutional address: Agricultural Research and Development Station Turda, 27 Agriculturii Street, 401100, Turda, Cluj County, România Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, 30 Fântânele Street, 400294, Cluj-Napoca, România Home adress: Vlahuţă Alexander Street, Block Lama A, scale 1, 4th floor, 19 ap., 400 310, Cluj-Napoca,. Cluj County, România Tel.: 0040745 367373, e-mail:[email protected] Book editing: This online manual is the second part of the book “Integrated pest management in relation to environmental sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Avian Biology JAV-02474 Mills, L
    Journal of Avian Biology JAV-02474 Mills, L. J., Wilson, J. D., Lange, A., Moore, K., Henwood, B., Knipe, H., Chaput, D. L. and Tyler, C. R. 2020. Using molecular and crowd-sourcing methods to assess breeding ground diet of a migratory brood parasite of conservation concern. – J. Avian Biol. 2020: e02474 Supplementary material Supplementary materials DNA extraction Ethanol was removed from the samples by freeze-drying to prevent loss of DNA from the vials, and dried samples were stored at -80 °C until DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using a precipitation and re-suspension method adapted from Bramwell et al. (1995), with modifications recommended by Lever et al. (2015). Lysis buffer (30 mM Tris, 30 mM EDTA, pH 8) was added at room temperature and mixed by vortex. Samples were Quickly re-frozen in liQuid nitrogen to lyse cells and then briefly thawed in a 37 °C water bath. A mixture of two different beads (0.2 g ceramic beads 1.4 mm and 0.3 g garnet beads 0.7 mm) was added and samples were shaken at 30 Hz for 3 x 40 s using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden Germany). To 19-parts sample solution, 1 part SDS solution (10% w/v) and 0.1 parts proteinase K (20 mg/ml) were added, and samples incubated for 4 h in a shaking incubator at 55 °C to continue lysis and protein digestion. Sample temperature was raised to 65 °C and to each 5 part sample solution, 1 part of 5 M NaCl solution was added and mixed by inversion, then 0.8 parts warm CTAB solution (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 10% w/v) added and mixed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition
    The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 1 The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition By D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford Copyright © D.W. Emley, 2014 ISBN (online version): 978-1-910434-00-0 Available from : http://www.staffs-ecology.org.uk Front cover : Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla, Dave Emley Introduction to the up-dated and revised edition ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MICROPTERIGIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 ERIOCRANIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 NEPTICULIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 4 OPOSTEGIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 6 HELIOZELIDAE .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]