Line 744 (12/15/19) -- Metro Rapid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Commuter Rail System Study
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light -
Copy of the Changing Face of the San Fernando Valley Rev 2…
The Changing Face of the San Fernando Valley By Joel Kotkin Erika Ozuna 2002 A Project of: Pepperdine University-School of Public Policy and the Economic Alliance of the San Fernando Valley PRELIMINARY DRAFT - PREVIEW EDITION Tablle of Contents “In tackling these challenges, the Valley’s leadership must work not only to address 1. Introduction 3 these issues but do so in a way that 2. Historical Evolution: From stresses the common challenges an increasingly diverse population faces. the Chumash and Ranchland There is no Latino housing crisis, or to ‘America’s Suburb’ 5 Armenian crime problem, or Vietnamese 3. The Mestizo Valley 10 education deficit. These are common 4. Are We on the Road to problems faced by all Valleyites; they can Ghettoization? 13 only be solved by this community acting 5. Rethinking the Valley as a as one.” ‘Melting Pot Suburb’ 16 6. Looking Forward: Prospects for the Mestizo Valley 19 7. The Challenge to Leadership 22 Special Thanks To: Jennifer Seuss, Karen Speicher, Val Aslanyan, Luci Stephens, Talar Aslanian, Gregory Ponds (Master of Public Policy Candidates – School of Public Policy) James Wilburn, dean, School of Public Policy, as well as Jon Kemp, Tami McKelvy, Sheryl Kelo and Marie-Ann Thaler, all of Pepperdine University; David W. Fleming, Robert L. Scott and Bruce D. Ackerman of the Economic Alliance of the San Fernando Valley © Copyright 2002, Economic Alliance of the San Fernando Valley, 5121 Van Nuys Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA - 818-379-7000 – [email protected] - All Rights Reserved San Fernando Valley 2 The Changing Face of the San Fernando Valley INTRODUCTION Few places in America over the past quarter century have undergone as profound a change in its ethnic character than the San Fernando Valley. -
BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT) -
[Title Over Two Lines (Shift+Enter to Break Line)]
BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT White Paper #2: Strategic Considerations October 2018 DRAFT: For discussion purposes 1 1 I• Purpose of White Paper II• Vision & goals for bus as voiced by stakeholders III• Key definitions IV• Strategic considerations Table of V• Deep-dive chapters to support each strategic consideration Contents 1. What is the role of Buses in the region? 2. Level of regional commitment to speeding up Buses? 3. Regional governance / delivery model for bus? 4. What business should Metrobus be in? 5. What services should Metrobus operate? 6. How should Metrobus operate? VI• Appendix: Elasticity of demand for bus 2 DRAFT: For discussion purposes I. Purpose of White Paper 3 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Purpose of White Paper 1. Present a set of strategic 2. Provide supporting analyses 3. Enable the Executive considerations for regional relevant to each consideration Steering Committee (ESC) to bus transformation in a neutral manner set a strategic direction for bus in the region 4 DRAFT: For discussion purposes This paper is a thought piece; it is intended to serve as a starting point for discussion and a means to frame the ensuing debate 1. Present a The strategic considerations in this paper are not an set of strategic exhaustive list of all decisions to be made during this considerations process; they are a set of high-level choices for the Bus Transformation Project to consider at this phase of for regional strategy development bus transformation Decisions on each of these considerations will require trade-offs to be continually assessed throughout this effort 5 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Each strategic consideration in the paper is 2. -
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness. -
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?
National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Bus/BRT Applications Introduction • I am Steve Andrle from TRB standing in for Randy McCourt, DKS Associates and 2019 ITE International Vice President • I co-manage with Claire Randall15 TRB public transit standing committees. • I want to bring you up to date on planned bus- oriented improvements to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What is the MUTCD? • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Standards for roadway signs, signals, and markings • Authorized in 23 CFR, Part 655: It is an FHWA document. • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) develops content • Sponsored by 19 organizations including ITE, AASHTO, APTA and ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) Background • Bus rapid transit, busways, and other bus applications have expanded greatly since the last edition of the MUTCD in 2009 • The bus-related sections need to be updated • Much of the available research speaks to proposed systems, not actual experience • The NCUTCD felt it was a good time to survey actual systems to see what has worked, what didn’t work, and to identify gaps. National Survey • The NCUTCD established a task force with APTA and FTA • Working together they issued a survey in April of 2018. I am sure some of you received it. • The results will be released to the NCUTCD on June 20 – effectively now • I cannot give you any details until the NCUTCD releases the findings Survey Questions • Have you participated in design and/or operations of -
Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No. -
Powerpoint Template
The Challenges of Planning and Executing Major Underground Transit Programs in Los Angeles Bryan Pennington, Senior Executive Officer, Program Management • Nation’s third largest transportation system • FY2018 Budget of $6.1 billion • Over 9,000 employees • Nation’s largest clean-air fleet (over 2,200 CNG buses) • 450 miles of Metro Rapid Bus System • 131.7 miles of Metro Rail (113 stations) • Average Weekday Boardings (Bus & Rail) – 1.2 million • 513 miles of freeway HOV lanes 2 • New rail and bus rapid transit projects • New highway projects • Enhanced bus and rail service • Local street, signal, bike/pedestrian improvements • Affordable fares for seniors, students and persons with disabilities • Maintenance/replacement of aging system • Bike and pedestrian connections to transit facilities 3 4 5 6 7 • New rail and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) capital projects • Rail yards, rail cars, and start-up buses for new BRT lines • Includes 2% for system-wide connectivity projects such as airports, countywide BRT, regional rail and Union Station 8 Directions Walk to Blue Line and travel to Union Station Southwest Chief to Los Angeles Union Station 9 • Rail transit projects • Crenshaw LAX Transit Project • Regional Connector Transit Project • Westside Purple Line Extension Project • Critical success factors • Financial considerations/risk management • Contract strategy • Lessons learned • Future underground construction • Concluding remarks • Questions and answers 10 11 •Los Angeles Basin •Faults •Hydrocarbons •Groundwater •Seismicity •Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide 12 •Crenshaw LAX Transit Project •Regional Connector Transit Project •Westside Purple Line Extension Project • Section 1 • Section 2 • Section 3 13 • 13.7 km Light Rail • 8 Stations • Aerial Grade Separations, Below Grade, At-Grade Construction • Maintenance Facility Yard • $1.3 Billion Construction Contract Awarded to Walsh / Shea J.V. -
Orange Line Transit Neighborhood Plan Project
DEPARTMENT OF EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING City of Los Angeles 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 525 - LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-4801 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CALIFORNIA VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT (213) 978-1271 RENEE DAKE WILSON KEVIN J. KELLER, AICP VICE-PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER CAROLINE CHOE (213) 978-1272 VAHID KHORSAND KAREN MACK LISA M. WEBBER, AICP SAMANTHA MILLMAN DEPUTY DIRECTOR MARC MITCHELL VERONICA PADILLA-CAMPOS (213) 978-1274 DANA M. PERLMAN ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR http://planning.lacity.org ROCKY WILES COMMISSION OFFICE MANAGER (213) 978-1300 NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, AND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT NEW ZONES AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR PORTIONS OF THE VAN NUYS-NORTH SHERMAN OAKS AND NORTH HOLLYWOOD-VALLEY VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties DATE: July 11, 2018 The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (DCP), as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to evaluate the Orange Line Transit Neighborhood Plan Project or “Project.” The Project will include: (1) Changes to land-use and zoning regulations in areas proximate to the Metro Orange Line (“Orange Line Transit Neighborhood Plan” or “TNP”); (2) Amendments to the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to adopt new zoning regulations as part of the re:code LA program (“Zoning Code Update”); (3) All necessary amendments to the Van Nuys-North Sherman Oaks and North Hollywood-Valley Village Community Plans, the General Plan Framework Element, the Mobility Plan, and other General Plan elements; and (4) Ordinances to effectuate changes to overlay zones, the Los Angeles Municipal Code, and other land-use ordinances and regulations, as may be necessary, to implement the above. -
Medical Tower Encino
A 48,590 SF MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING WITH SIGNIFICANT RENTAL ENCINO UPSIDE IDEALLY LOCATED IN THE AFFLUENT LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUB-MARKET OF ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 17835MEDICAL VENTURA BOULEVARD TOWERENCINO, CA 91316 ENCINO 17835MEDICAL VENTURA BOULEVARD TOWERENCINO, CA 91316 INVESTMENT ADVISORS: BRANDON MICHAELS TEAM MEMBERS Senior Managing Director of Investments Sean Brandt Senior Director, National Retail Group Ben Brownstein Tel: (818) 212-2794 Nicole Cottrell Fax: (818) 212-2710 Dana Liu [email protected] Steven Schechter License: CA #01434685 Austin Sreden www.BrandonMichaelsGroup.com CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written con- sent of Marcus & Millichap. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective pur- chasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the com- pliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. -
Van Nuys Neighborhood Watch News
VAN NUYS NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH NEWS Officer inSenior Charge, Lead Sergeant Officers Mike Unit Padilla February 2020 6240 Sylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, CA 91401 facebook.com/LAPDVanNuysDivision twitter.com/lapdVanNuysDiv @lapdvannuysdiv Please come out and help shape the future of your community. Van Nuys Neighborhood Council: General Board Meeting is the 2nd Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., Location: Marvin Braude Constituents Service Center, 6262 Van Nuys Boulevard., Van Nuys, CA. Greater Valley Glen Neighborhood Council: General meeting is the 1st Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m., Location: Valley College, 5800 Fulton Avenue, Van Nuys, CA. Valley Glen Neighborhood Association: General meeting is the 3rd Tuesday of every even numbered month at 7:00 p.m., Location: Valley College, 5800 Fulton Avenue, Van Nuys, CA. Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council: General meeting is the 2nd Monday of each month at 6:30 p.m., Location: Milikan Middle School, 5041 Sunnyslope Avenue, Sherman Oaks, CA. Sherman Oaks Homeowners’ Association: General meeting is the 3rd Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m., Location: Notre Dame High School located at 13645 Riverside Drive, Sherman Oaks, CA. Van Nuys Clergy Council Meeting: General meeting is the last Thursday of each month at 9:00 a.m., Location: Bernardi Senior Center, 6514 Sylmar Ave., Van Nuys, CA. If you are interested in becoming a Block Captain and starting a Neighborhood Watch Program in your neighborhood, please call your Senior Lead Officer at the numbers listed below for further details. Please sign up on Nextdoor.com to receive current updates about crime trends and events in your community Who to Contact For crimes in progress and medical emergencies dial: 911. -
Streetscape Plan and Design Guidelines
SHERMAN OAKS Streetscape Plan and Design Guidelines Approved by the City Planning Commission on May 23, 2002. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Introduction Section 2. Sherman Oaks Streetscape Plan Section 3. Streetscape Elements & Improvements Section 4. Document Submittal Guidelines Section 5. Maintenance Section 6. On-Site Improvement Standards/Design Guidelines Section 7. Document Submittal Guidelines For On-Site Projects Section 8. Review Section 9. Acknowledgements A Part of the General Plan - City of Los Angeles www.lacity.org/pln (General Plan - Other Plans/Guidelines) San Diego Frwy San Diego Frwy PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AREA PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED PEDESTRIAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Langdon Ave Ventura Blvd Ventura Sepulveda Blvd SUBAREA A Peach Ave Saugus Ave Sepulveda Blvd Morrison St Camarillo St Greenleaf St Greenleaf Valley Vista Blvd Vista Valley Sutton St Sutton Halbrent Ave Dickens St Dickens Ventura Frwy Ventura La MaidaSt Moorpark St Moorpark Columbus Ave Noble Ave Burnent Ave Noble Ave Norwich Ave Lemona Ave Saloma Ave Sherman OaksStreetscapePlanBoundaries Kester Blvd Moorpark St Moorpark Kester Blvd Dickens St Dickens Greenleaf St Greenleaf Hortense St Hortense Willis Ave SUBAREA B Nation Ave Ventura Frwy Ventura Cedros Ave Cedros Ave Tobias Ave Hortense St Vesper AveH o r t e n V s a e l l S e Van Nuys Blvd Vista Del Monte Ave t y H e a r t D r Greenleaf St Greenleaf Van Nuys Blvd Kling St Moorpark St Moorpark SUBAREA C Ventura Blvd Ventura Benefit St Benefit Milbank St Dickens St Dickens Tilden Ave Beverly Glen Blvd Sylmar Ave