DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitigation Plan for City of Yucaipa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitigation Plan for City of Yucaipa Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Hazard Mitigation Plan Update FEMA Approval Date: 02-26-2021 Date of District Board Approval 03-09-2021 Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review Sturdivan 2021 Primary Contact During Development Sturdivan Emergency Management Consulting Gary Sturdivan 909-658-5974 [email protected] Agency Primary Contact: John Wrobel Yucaipa Valley Water District (909)-790-7597 [email protected] Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review Sturdivan 2021 Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1.0 Purpose of the Plan. .................................................................................................... 1.1 Community Profile. ..................................................................................................... 1.1.1 Physical Setting. .......................................................................................................... 1.1.2 History ........................................................................................................................ 1.1.3 Demographics.............................................................................................................. 1.1.4 Population. .................................................................................................................. 1.1.5 Existing Land Use ....................................................................................................... 1.1.6 Development Trends ................................................................................................... 1.1.7 Water Development Trends. ....................................................................................... SECTION 2. Plan Adoption ........................................................................................................... 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ........................................................................... 2.2 Promulgation Authority .............................................................................................. 2.3 Primary Point of Contact ............................................................................................. SECTION 3. Planning Process ................................................................................................... 3.1 Preparing for the Plan ................................................................................................. 3.1.1 Planning Team ............................................................................................................. 3.2 Coordination with Other Jurisdictions, Agencies, and Organizations ........................ 3.3 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................... 3.4 Assess the Hazards ...................................................................................................... 3.5 Set Goals ..................................................................................................................... 3.6 Review and Propose Possible Mitigation Measures.................................................... 3.7 Draft the Hazard Mitigation Plan ................................................................................ 3.8 Adopt the Plan............................................................................................................. SECTION 4. Risk Assessment ................................................................................................... 4.1 Hazard Identification ................................................................................................... 4.1.1. Hazard Screening Criteria ........................................................................................... 4.1.2. Hazard Assessment Matrix ......................................................................................... 4.1.3. Hazard Prioritization ................................................................................................... 4.2 Hazard Profile ............................................................................................................. 4.3 Hazard Definition for Earthquake ............................................................................... 4.3.1. Geologic Setting ......................................................................................................... 4.3.2. Previous Occurrences for Earthquake ......................................................................... 4.3.3. Hazard Summary for Earthquakes .............................................................................. 4.4 Hazard Definition for Wildfires .................................................................................. 4.4.1. Fire Hazard Severity ................................................................................................... 4.4.2. Previous Occurrences of Wildfires ............................................................................. 4.4.3. Hazard Summary for Wildfires ................................................................................... 4.5 Hazard Definition for Drought .................................................................................... 4.5.1. Previous Occurrences of Drought ............................................................................... Yucaipa Valley Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan for Review Sturdivan 2021 4.5.2. Hazard Summery of Drought ...................................................................................... 4.6 Flooding ........................................................................................................................... 4.6.1. Hazard Definition for Flooding .................................................................................. 4.6.2. Identification of Flood-Prone Areas............................................................................ 4.6.3. Hazard Summary for Flooding ................................................................................... 4.7 Inventory Assets.......................................................................................................... 4.7.1. Population ................................................................................................................... 4.7.2. Buildings ..................................................................................................................... 4.7.3. Critical Facility List .................................................................................................... 4.8 Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................................................... 4.8.1. Methodology .................................................................................................................... SECTION 5. Community Capability Assessment .................................................................... 5.1 Agencies and People .................................................................................................. 5.2 Existing Plans ............................................................................................................ 5.3 Regulations, Codes, Policies, and Ordinances ........................................................... 5.4 Mitigation Programs .................................................................................................. 5.5 Fiscal Resources ........................................................................................................ SECTION 6. Mitigation Strategies .......................................................................................... 6.1 Overview .................................................................................................................... 6.2 Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Projects ................................................................ 6.2.1. Earthquake ................................................................................................................. 6.2.2. Wildfire ...................................................................................................................... 6.2.3. Drought ...................................................................................................................... 6.2.4. Flood ............................................................................................................................... 6.3 Mitigation Priorities ................................................................................................... 6.4 Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................ SECTION 7. - Plan Maintenance.................................................................................. 7.1 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan .......................................................... 7.2 Implementation through Existing Programs............................................................... 7.3 Continued Public Involvement ................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Yucaipa Valley Water District County Map. ................................................................ Figure 2 - Flow chart for developing a Hazard Mitigation Plan. ................................................... Figure 3 – Risk Assessment Process. ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission Springs Water District Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Mission Springs Water District Local Hazard Mitigation Plan CalOES Approval Date: XX-XX-XXXX FEMA Approval Date: XX-XX-XXXX Date of District Board Approval XX-XX-XXXX Mission Springs Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Primary Contact During Development Sturdivan Emergency Management Consulting Gary Sturdivan Mobile: (909)658-5974 Email: [email protected] Agency Primary Contact: Bassam Alzammar Mission Springs Water District Phone: (760)660-4943 Email: [email protected] Mission Springs Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………... 1.0 Purpose of the Plan………………………………………………………………… 1.1 Authority…………………………………………………………………………… 1.2 Community Profile…………………………………………………………………. 1.3 Physical Setting……………………………………………………………………. 1.4 Demographics……………………………………………………………………… 1.5 Existing Land Use…………………………………………………………………. 1.6 Development Trends………………………………………………………………. SECTION 2. Plan Adoption…………………………………………………………………... 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body ........................................................................... 2.2 Promulgation Authority .............................................................................................. 2.3 Primary Point of Contact ............................................................................................. SECTION 3. Planning Process……………………………………………………………...... 3.1 Preparing for the Plan ................................................................................................. 3.2 Planning Team ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR
    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA START TIME Duration min:sec Public Affairs Issue 1 Public Affairs Issue 2 Show & Narrative 1/2/2017 TAKE TWO: The Binge– 2016 was a terrible year - except for all the awesome new content that was Entertainment Industry available to stream. Mark Jordan Legan goes through the best that 2016 had to 9:42 8:30 offer with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: The Ride 2017– 2017 is here and our motor critic, Sue Carpenter, Transportation puts on her prognosticator hat to predict some of the automotive stories we'll be talking about in the new year 9:51 6:00 with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Presidents and the Press– Presidential historian Barbara Perry says contention between a President Politics Media and the news media is nothing new. She talks with Alex Cohen about her advice for journalists covering the 10:07 10:30 Trump White House. TAKE TWO: The Wall– Political scientist Peter Andreas says building Trump's Immigration Politics wall might be easier than one thinks because hundreds of miles of the border are already lined with barriers. 10:18 12:30 He joins Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Prison Podcast– A podcast Law & is being produced out of San Quentin Media Order/Courts/Police State Prison called Ear Hustle. We hear some excerpts and A Martinez talks to 10:22 9:30 one of the producers, Nigel Poor. TAKE TWO: The Distance Between Us– Reyna Grande grew up in poverty in Books/ Literature/ Iguala, Mexico, left behind by her Immigration Authors parents who had gone north looking for a better life and she's written a memoir for young readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandatory Moratorium on Non-Renewals After Recent Wildfire Activity
    RICARDO LARA CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER BULLETIN PURSUANT TO INSURANCE CODE SECTION 675.1(b) AMENDED* TO: All Admitted and Non-Admitted1 Insurers Writing Residential Property Insurance in California FROM: Commissioner Ricardo Lara DATE: December 18, 2019 RE: Mandatory Moratorium on Non-Renewals After Recent Wildfire Activity *This bulletin supplements the bulletin of the same title issued on December 5, 2019 to provide additional information regarding ZIP Codes within or adjacent to the fire perimeters for the fires identified in the Governor’s various Emergency Declarations discussed herein. Recent insurer actions in California have created considerable disruption for California’s residents; particularly those who live in or near regions of the state potentially threatened by wildfires. The Commissioner continues to receive information from Californians who have struggled to obtain residential property insurance coverage in the voluntary market. In August of this year, the Department of Insurance published data, which shows an increasing trend of non-renewals for people at risk of wildfires.2 California’s property insurers are retreating from areas they identify as having higher wildfire risk. In many communities across the state, finding affordable comprehensive fire insurance has become difficult. So difficult that real estate transactions have stalled or been cancelled. If this trend is allowed to continue, it could further disrupt local real estate markets and cause property values to decline, reducing tax revenue available for vital services to residents such as fire protection, community fire mitigation, law enforcement, road repairs, and hospitals in these communities. Commissioner Lara has met with many of these affected communities and policyholders over the last year who are facing non-renewals and rising premiums.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Safety Element 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 Other General Plan Elements .................................................................................................................... 3 Area Plans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................... 3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ....................................................................... 4 HAZARD REDUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ISSUES AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................................ 6 CODE CONFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Authors: Regan Galinato, Eric Green, Hazen O'malley, Parmida Behmardi
    Authors: Regan Galinato, Eric Green, Hazen O’Malley, Parmida Behmardi1 ANTHRO 25A: Environmental Injustice Instructor: Prof. Dr. Kim Fortun Department of Cultural Anthropology Graduate Teaching Associates: Kaitlyn Rabach Tim Schütz Undergraduate Teaching Associates Nina Parshekofteh Lafayette Pierre White University of California Irvine, Fall 2019 1 A total of eight students contributed to this case study, some of whom chose to be anonymous. TABLE OF CONTENTS What is the setting of this case? [Collective Response] 3 How does climate change produce environmental vulnerabilities and harms in this setting? [Regan Galinato] 6 What factors -- social, cultural, political, technological, ecological -- contribute to environmental health vulnerability and injustice in this setting? [Collective Response] 10 Who are the stakeholders, what are their characteristics, and what are their perceptions of the problems? [Collective Response] 15 What have different stakeholder groups done (or not done) in response to the problems in this case? 17 How have big media outlets and environmental organizations covered environmental problems related to worse case scenarios in this setting? 19 What local actions would reduce environmental vulnerability and injustice related to fast disaster in this setting? [Parmida Behmardi] 21 What extra-local actions (at state, national or international levels) would reduce environmental vulnerability and injustice related to fast disaster in this setting and similar settings? [Hazen O’Malley] 25 What kinds of data and research would be useful in efforts to characterize and address environmental threats (related to fast disaster, pollution and climate change) in this setting and similar settings? 29 What, in your view, is ethically wrong or unjust in this case? [Eric Green] 31 BIBLIOGRAPHY (GENERATE WITH ZOTERO) 34 FIGURES 38 APPENDIX 40 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 SAR Monitoring Annual Report
    • SECTION 11 Santa Ana Region 2019-2020 Monitoring Annual Report P8/235139 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SANTA ANA REGION 2019-2020 Monitoring Annual Report Executive Summary Strawberry Creek SMC Bioassessment Trend Site Monitoring was conducted by the Riverside County Watershed Protection Program during the 2019-2020 monitoring year to address the objectives of the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) of the 2010 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. This report presents the results of this ninth year of monitoring under the MRP of the 2010 MS4 Permit. The MRP is limited to the area of Riverside County under Permittee jurisdiction within the Santa Ana River Watershed, referred to throughout this report as the Santa Ana Region or SAR. The climate of the SAR is SAR Boundary and Monitoring Sites Mediterranean, characterized by warm, dry summers and cool, rainy winters. Annual precipitation ranges from less than 10 inches in the alluvial valleys to over 36 inches in the mountains. In general, shading from the coastal western boundary of the Santa Ana Mountains translates to very little precipitation throughout valley areas of the inland SAR. Under natural conditions, the majority of streams in the SAR are ephemeral, meaning they are dry and only flowing during and immediately after rain. PERMITTEES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - SANTA ANA REGION MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 YEAR 1 MONITORING ANNUAL REPORT Monitoring and Assessment Requirements During the 2019-2020 monitoring year, the SAR Monitoring Program was implemented in accordance with the requirements of the 2010 MS4 Permit. All wet and dry weather monitoring components of the MS4 outfall monitoring program, receiving water monitoring program, and bioassessment monitoring (through participation in the Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition [SMC] regional monitoring program) were completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 2020-1 Mandatory Moratorium on Residential Non-Renewals
    RICARDO LARA CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER BULLETIN PURSUANT TO INSURANCE CODE SECTION 675.1(b) 2nd AMENDED* TO: All Admitted and Non-Admitted1 Insurers Writing Residential Property Insurance in California FROM: Commissioner Ricardo Lara DATE: February 3 , 2020 RE: Mandatory Moratorium on Non-Renewals After Recent Wildfire Activity *This bulletin supplements the bulletins of the same title issued on December 5, 2019 and December 18, 2019 to provide additional information regarding ZIP Codes within or adjacent to the fire perimeters for the fires identified in the Governor’s various Emergency Declarations discussed herein. Recent insurer actions in California have created considerable disruption for California’s residents; particularly those who live in or near regions of the state potentially threatened by wildfires. The Commissioner continues to receive information from Californians who have struggled to obtain residential property insurance coverage in the voluntary market. In August of this year, the Department of Insurance published data, which shows an increasing trend of non-renewals for people at risk of wildfires.2 California’s property insurers are retreating from areas they identify as having higher wildfire risk. In many communities across the state, finding affordable comprehensive fire insurance has become difficult. So difficult that real estate transactions have stalled or been cancelled. If this trend is allowed to continue, it could further disrupt local real estate markets and cause property values to decline, reducing tax revenue available for vital services to residents such as fire protection, community fire mitigation, law enforcement, road repairs, and hospitals in these communities. Commissioner Lara has met with many of these affected communities and policyholders over the last year who are facing non-renewals and rising premiums.
    [Show full text]
  • Calaveras Big Trees State Park 1170 East Highway 4, Arnold, CA 95223 (209) 795-2334
    Our Mission Calaveras The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and t is unlikely that education of the people of California by helping I Big Trees to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological anyone could look upon diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities State Park for high-quality outdoor recreation. the Sequoiadendron giganteum and not feel a sense of awe California State Parks supports equal access. and reverence. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (209) 795-2334. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov SaveTheRedwoods.org/csp Calaveras Big Trees State Park 1170 East Highway 4, Arnold, CA 95223 (209) 795-2334 www.parks.ca.gov/calaverasbigtrees © 2004 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) T hree miles north of Arnold off and hunters built their seasonal villages Highway 4, the colossal trees of Calaveras alongside the flourishing rivers of the Sierra Big Trees State Park stand in quiet Nevada foothills. The acorns and other seeds testimony to prehistoric times. These the Miwok harvested in the fall were a vital massive relics, which can reach a height part of their diet. Their way of life was rich of 325 feet and a diameter of 33 feet, are in ceremony and social activity, including descended from trees that were standing the important harvesting and grinding of when dinosaurs roamed Earth and birds, the fall acorn crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama's Legacy
    MAIN STORIES CONTROVERSY TALKING POINTS GRILLING How Putin Hollywood’s SESSIONS got everything contempt ON RACE he wanted for Trump p.4 Pages 6, 11 p.17 Meryl Streep THE BEST OF THE U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL MEDIA Obama’s legacy Did he deliver on his promises—and will any of it last? Pages 5, 16 JANUARY 20, 2017 VOLUME 17 ISSUE 805 ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EVERYTHING THAT MATTERS WWW.THEWEEK.COM WELCOME TO OUR WORLD Breitling reinvents the connected watch firmly geared towards performance. Every inch an instrument of the future, the Exospace B55 multifunction electronic chronograph pushes the boundaries of comfort, ergonomics and efficiency. The titanium case of this compendium of innovations houses an exclusive SuperQuartzTM caliber chronometer-certified by the COSC and featuring a range of original functions tailor-made for pilots and men of action. Welcome to the world of precision, feats and high-tech sophistication. Welcome to the vanguard of instruments for professionals. Contents 3 Editor’s letter When I recently mentioned in this space that I was reading J.D. Nonetheless, our nation’s warring tribes are locked in a peren- Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy, a peeved reader wrote me to say that I nial argument over which is “The Real America.” (See Best U.S. wouldn’t understand it, “because you very likely have never met columns.) After Barack Obama’s victories in 2008 and 2012, any of the types of people he writes about.” His assumption urban progressives were confident their America— multicultural, was that some fancy-pants editor based in New York City could socially liberal, youthful—was ascendant.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip and Marly Spurgeon: Shall We Dance?
    FEBRUARY 2017 Your Community News Source — Serving Sun City Lincoln Hills — ONLINE AT: SUNSENIORNEWS.COM BRAT LE IN E G Philip and Marly Spurgeon: Shall We Dance? C BY LINDA LUCCHETTI Composer Irving Berlin may “He is a very patient 15 have been on to something. His instructor,” Marly said. She should song, “The Best Things Happen know. Philip was assisting at a local YEARS! While You’re Dancing,” from dance studio in Roseville when he the movie, White Christmas, met Marly who came in for lessons. seems to say it all. This may be Their fi rst dance together was the IN THIS ISSUE especially true for Philip and Fox Trot, but per Marly, she fell Marly Spurgeon, who met when in love with him while dancing From the Editors ...........................................................3 they danced together for the fi rst the Rumba. Letters to the Editors ................................................... 3 time -- an event that changed their Marly was born in Goiania, Placer County Supervisor .........................................4 lives forever. Brazil to an Italian and Portuguese 2017 Tax Season is Here! ........................................4 Philip started taking ballroom family, and was raised among fi ve The Music Man Comes to Lincoln .........................5 dance lessons some 20 years ago, siblings. She worked for 20 years Players, Community Chorus, Vaudeville ...............7 after moving to Smartsville, Calif., at a bank in Brazil, fi rst part-time Favorite Restaurants ...............................................8 near Yuba City. At the time, he for 10 years, and then in a full- Ballroom, Country Couples ........................................9 was semi-retired and working on Philip and Marly Spurgeon time management position. She Annual Fine Arts Show ..............................................10 a ranch, breaking horses.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Trafficking
    W E D N E S D A Y 162nd YEAR • No. 218 JANUARY 11, 2017 CLEVELAND, TN 24 PAGES • 50¢ BCPEF credits board for ‘investment’ in education By CHRISTY ARMSTRONG “Our children have truly benefited The foundation also assisted schools teachers can use to quiz their students, and a single board policy change. Banner Staff Writer because of your support,” Bentley said. as they wrote thousands of dollars in to 486 local classrooms. The consent agenda included things Bentley shared many of the founda- grants and held community fundraising “This was not just a budget line item; like field trip approvals, while the policy The Bradley Cleveland Public tion’s efforts over the past year, stress- efforts. Results of these included Taylor it was an investment,” said Bentley. change had to do with how high school Education Foundation is grateful for the ing none of it would have been possible Elementary School receiving a nearly Bradley County Schools’ budget for students’ end of course testing affects “investment” local school boards are without help from local school boards $50,000 Leonore Annenberg School the 2016-17 year included a $25,000 their final grades. making. and community members. Fund for Children grant and Bradley donation to the BCPEF for its operating Up until Thursday night, board Policy That was the assessment of Matt Teachers received thousands of dol- Central High School raising funds to expenses. This was a jump from 4.700 stated high school students’ end Bentley, the BCPEF’s executive commit- lars in grants for their classrooms. build a new athletic weight room facili- $15,000 in the 2015-16 year.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Divisions of Boating and Waterways, Historic Preservation and Off-Highway Vehicles News Release For Immediate Release Contacts: Jan. 31, 2018 Adeline Yee Ashley Boarman California State Parks Save the Redwoods League (916) 651-8725 (415) 359-2312 California State Parks Begins Study of Fallen, Iconic ‘Tunnel Tree’ in Calaveras Big Trees State Park ARNOLD, Calif. – Marking one year since the famous Pioneer Cabin Tunnel Tree toppled, California State Parks, Save the Redwoods League and Humboldt State University today announced plans to use the fallen sequoia to study the tree’s life history and gather historic climate-related information for the surrounding area. The information will help California State Parks better manage the existing groves of redwood trees. The giant sequoia is the largest tree species in the world, with some trees reaching a diameter of 36 feet. Located within Calaveras Big Trees State Park within a relatively large sequoia grove containing more than 150 specimens estimated to be 2,000 years old, the Pioneer Cabin Tree was one of California’s oldest tourist attractions and a beloved specimen of a rare California native species. A combination of trunk and root decay and storm water runoff appears to have brought the giant sequoia down at its base on January 8, 2017, shattering it and a nearby cedar tree. The Pioneer Cabin Tree stood approximately 205 feet tall and was more than 19 feet in diameter (measured six feet from the ground). “California’s state parks are endowed with globally, nationally and regionally significant natural resources,” said Heather Reith, Senior Environmental Scientist at Calaveras Big Trees State Park.
    [Show full text]