Chronology of the Falling Away 1St Century to The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chronology of the Falling Away 1st Century to the Council of Nicaea – Louis Garbi "For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. "Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves.” (Acts20:29-30) A.D. 49-100 The falling away from Christ can be identified with these characteristics: Religious systems associated with Jesus Christ mingling with Judaism, Gnosticism, philosophies of men, and false apostles. A love of power over others prevailed. 100-117 Ignatius, a bishop of Antioch, made a distinction between bishops and presbytery (elders). He upheld the idea that the bishop was the only one who had the right to baptize. He reminds one of Diotrophese (III John) when he wrote; “Do follow your bishop, as Jesus followed the Father.”1 Historically he would be described as a monarchical bishop (one who solely rules as an overseer). This marks a rejection of the scriptural example and command of multiple overseers being appointed in a given congregation. Also, its high handed tone does not exemplify the Spirit of Christ. 135-160 Gnosticism was at its height of influence among the churches, though it lingered long afterward. By the latter half of the first century, a concept of Christ was being taught which denied His fleshly existence, saying He came in an “appearance” of flesh. It is thought one reason for its acceptance was the difficulty some had in reconciling a member of the godhead possessing our earthly form. (This probably stems from a concept that the flesh is tainted with original sin.) Also because of Gnosticism's wide and varied background, it was able to be insinuated among the unwary throughout the wide range of locations in which the gospel was received. “It took unto itself many elements from many sources, and assumed many forms. It is therefore, impossible to speak of a single type of Gnosticism.”2 The word comes from the same word translated as 'knowledge' in II Peter 1:5. However, the Gnostics understood this word to mean a type of knowledge mystically transferred to a believer, thus enlightening him without the need for a written testimony. It was experiential in nature. It stood opposed to receiving knowledge through the scriptures. Gnosticism had its roots in Egypt, Babylonia, and Persia. 1. It taught that matter is evil and spirit is good. (Dualism) 2. Its reception was mystical, based on the adherent’s “experience”. Gnosticism distinguished between the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New Testament. 1. The God of the O.T. created matter, therefore was called inferior. 2. The God of the N.T. is the God of light. Gnosticism rejected that Christ had our flesh and blood. Rather they believed He had flesh of a different nature, or a phantom representation. (An idea that persists to this day.) Gnosticism taught a limited candidacy for salvation. 1. Some were 'spiritual' and could attain 'knowledge.' 2. Some were less 'spiritual' but could attain a degree of faith. 3. Some were strictly material in their existence, therefore hopeless. Maricon, a wealthy ship-owner, became a member of the church at Rome. He apparently considered the system's growing rigidness as a result of regarding the God of the OT the 1 Walker: A History of the Christian Church 1:9 p.47 2 Ibid. 2:1 p.54 same as the God of the NT. He considered the God of the NT a God of mercy, and the OT God an inferior being. He was excommunicated in the year 144. “Maricon's movement was probably the most dangerous of those associated with Gnosticism. He sundered Christianity form its historic background as completely as had the more speculative Gnostic theories. He denied a real incarnation, and condemned the OT and its God. All this was the more plausible because done in the name of a growing legalism. For such a protest there was much justification. His churches spread extensively, in the orient especially, and survived into the fifth century.”3 150-175 An early from of the so-called Apostles Creed was developed. It was deemed necessary to recite it in order to be baptized. 154 The prestige of the Roman bishop began to emerge. Partially due to its great wealth and size, as well as being located in Rome (the focal point in much of the world's mind), the Roman church had a domineering influence among other churches. In 154, its influence included the fact that it chose its first monarchical bishop, Anicetus. 154-155 The observance of the Passover (later called Easter) is noted because of a controversy over the date of the occasion. This controversy was between Polycarp , bishop of Smyrna, and Anicetus, bishop of Rome. Note: The word 'Easter' was coined later. It comes from Eastre, “a Teutonic godless to whom sacrifice was offered in April.”4 Apparently the custom of some Jewish Christians to observe the Passover gradually came to be followed by many other churches to the point it became an unquestioned practice. This is contrary to Gal.4:10-11. 156 The Beginning of Montanism. About this time there was a growing expectancy for the 2nd coming of Christ. The miracles of the early church were fading out. There were those who wondered if there would be a renewed flourishing of this type of power. The setting was intensified by a growing burden of human authority in the churches. Montanus, a former priest of the idol Cybele, came on the scene as a self proclaimed instrument of the Holy Spirit, with prophetic utterances, and heralding the imminent return of Christ. There were two women associated with him, Priscilla and Maximilla. There were many attracted to this doctrine which was salted with rigorous asceticism; fasting, abstinence from meat, communal living, and celibacy. They gathered their disciples to an area in Phrygia, where they expected the New Jerusalem to be established. Though their prophecies were unfulfilled, there were many who were not discouraged and embraced this teaching. The movement continued for some time. 160 Monarchical Bishops were practically universal by this time. (Monarchical Bishop – a single overseer of many congregations in one city.) 3 Ibid 2:2 p.57 4 The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, “Easter” p.889 160-169 The “Catholic” orthodoxy began to appear. The word 'catholic' had been a loose description to the many assemblies professing Christ. Catholic means universal. However, around this period, it began to be used to denote a particular group of churches who battled the Gnostic and Montanist movements. They shared some notable features: Strengthened authority of the monarchical bishop, metropolitan churches5, the use of councils to initiate homogeneous policy, a common creed, a set body of scriptures. 185 A 'Christian' school of theology started at Alexandria. Alexandria had long been an important city in the Empire. It was a center of trade. It had a library of the highest reputation. It was also the crossroads for Eastern and Western thought. It had long mingled Judaism with Greek philosophy, so it was no surprise that the same was done with the message of Christ. At this time a philosopher, Pantaenus, did this very thing. It is not certain whether he originated the school of Christian thought, but Pantaenus is the one of note. The school was a private endeavor at this time and not yet officially incorporated into the churches. 186 Further advancement of the Roman church was indicated. Irenaeus, a bishop of Lyons, wrote; “Every church should agree with this church.”6 This in reference to the Roman church. He also upheld the idea of church councils; the only way of preventing Christianity from disintegrating into a thousand sects is for all Christians to accept humbly one doctrinal authority – the decrees of the episcopal councils of the church.”7 190 The continued controversy over scheduling the date of Passover resulted in more councils held to resolve the matter. 189-198 Victor, bishop of Rome, excommunicated congregations who refused to conform to the council. 200-260 Characteristics of church hierarchy were enhanced. “. between 200-260, the church as an organization took on most of the constitutional features that were to characterize if throughout the period of the dominance of the Graeco-Roman culture.”8 Here are some features of that institutionalization: 1. By this time the clergy – laity distinction was drawn and fixed. The word 'clergy' – kleros – is translated variously in the NT as: inheritance, lot, part, or heritage. Its literal meaning is a piece broken off or bits. It came to mean a portion or an acquisition. In I Pet.5:3, there is a warning for the elders not to consider the church as an acquisition. They were not to be lords. However, in the process of time the opposite attitude and practice became accepted. The warning in Acts 20:29 went unheeded by many. 2. Just as monarchical bishops presided over the local congregations in a city, the bishops in city churches extended authority over rural churches in the region of 5 (City churches which dominated other churches. The metropolitan churches visited by the apostles of Christ had special regard as keepers of the faith. In our time, this term has an entirely different connotation.) 6 Walker: . History. 2:5 p.63 7 Durant: Caesar and Christ 28:4 p.612-613 8 Walker: . .History. 2:77 p.87 the city. Likewise, this pattern was carried even further as the bishops in major cities (Rome, Antioch, Ephesus, Alexandria, Jerusalem, Carthage) exerted influence over bishops in smaller cities.