EE Assessment of Outcomes Instructions

Outcome Yr Course # Electrical Engineering Program OUTCOME ASSESSMENT REPORT FORM

Faculty in charge ______Course title:

1. Please describe briefly the task that was designed to assess the outcome:

2. Fill in the following table to report numerical scores received by the students:

# of students # of students with Cutoff score to get "satisfactory" rating on task who did task satisfactory scores (suggested is 70%)

3. Report problems that you have identified in the students' abilities with respect to the given outcome.

4. Describe efforts that you have made to improve the student's abilities.

5. Collect and submit copies of student work (deleting information identifying the student). Include examples of low, average, and high performance.

6. Provide any comment that you feel would be useful for the assessment process.

5/8/18 EE EE Assessment of Outcomes Instructions (Report form on other side)

Program Outcomes: a An ability to apply mathematical, scientific, and engineering knowledge to solve electrical engineering problems. b An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. c An ability to design an electrical engineering system, component, or process to meet desired needs. d An ability to function on teams whose members have interdependent and complementary skills e An ability to identify, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems. f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. g An ability to communicate technical information effectively in oral and written form. h The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. i A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, lifelong learning. j An awareness of current events and trends affecting the electrical engineering profession. k An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

Course Assessment Matrix: Fall 2008 Spring 2009 a 3300 – Nagel & Sai 3500 –- Chen 2280 – Rasmussen 3700 – Kalla Question: final Question: final Final exam Question: Midterm b 3500 – Chen 2280 – Rasmussen 3510 – Arn Stolp Lab assignment Lab assignment Lab assignment c 3500 – Chen 4910 – Open House 3700 –- Kalla Lab assignment Judges rating - Design Lab assignment d 3710 – Brunvand 3940 – Cotter 4910 – Instructors Team self assess Team self assess Team self assess e LEAP 1101– 4910 – Open House Veeraghanta Judges rating - Identify etc. Ethics assignment f 4910 – Instructors Ethics classes – Staff Ethics essay Grades g 2260 – Cotter 3300 – Nagel & Sai 4910 – Instructors 4910 – Open House Lab 1 conclusion Final lab report Written report Judges rating – Oral h 3300 – Nagel & Sai 4910 – Instructors Gen Ed classes – Staff Impact essay Impact essay Grades i 4910 – Instructors IEEE – Staff Quality of refs # IEEE members j 3900 – Grow 3910 – Grow List speakers, attend. List speakers, attendance k 3110 – Charles 3700 – Kalla 1020 – Rasmussen Spice assignment CAD tools Matlab quiz Instructions: 1) Define a task that addresses the given outcome as precisely and as exclusively as possible. The task may be related to the course, but does not have to be. 2) Develop a rating scheme for assessing the performance of students. Suggested interpretation of scores: 0-59%: unsatisfactory 60-69%: barely acceptable 70-79%: standard 80-89%: good 90-100%: excellent However, the faculty report allows you to specify the level corresponding to a "satisfactory" score. 3) Collect examples of student work (collect 3 samples: low/average/high performance). 4) When the evaluation is completed, please fill out the faculty report (other side) and return it to Wilma.

5/8/18 EE