<p> Outcome Yr Course # Electrical Engineering Program OUTCOME ASSESSMENT REPORT FORM</p><p>Faculty in charge ______Course title: </p><p>1. Please describe briefly the task that was designed to assess the outcome:</p><p>2. Fill in the following table to report numerical scores received by the students:</p><p># of students # of students with Cutoff score to get "satisfactory" rating on task who did task satisfactory scores (suggested is 70%)</p><p>3. Report problems that you have identified in the students' abilities with respect to the given outcome.</p><p>4. Describe efforts that you have made to improve the student's abilities.</p><p>5. Collect and submit copies of student work (deleting information identifying the student). Include examples of low, average, and high performance.</p><p>6. Provide any comment that you feel would be useful for the assessment process.</p><p>5/8/18 EE EE Assessment of Outcomes Instructions (Report form on other side)</p><p>Program Outcomes: a An ability to apply mathematical, scientific, and engineering knowledge to solve electrical engineering problems. b An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. c An ability to design an electrical engineering system, component, or process to meet desired needs. d An ability to function on teams whose members have interdependent and complementary skills e An ability to identify, formulate, and solve electrical engineering problems. f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. g An ability to communicate technical information effectively in oral and written form. h The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. i A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, lifelong learning. j An awareness of current events and trends affecting the electrical engineering profession. k An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.</p><p>Course Assessment Matrix: Fall 2008 Spring 2009 a 3300 – Nagel & Sai 3500 –- Chen 2280 – Rasmussen 3700 – Kalla Question: final Question: final Final exam Question: Midterm b 3500 – Chen 2280 – Rasmussen 3510 – Arn Stolp Lab assignment Lab assignment Lab assignment c 3500 – Chen 4910 – Open House 3700 –- Kalla Lab assignment Judges rating - Design Lab assignment d 3710 – Brunvand 3940 – Cotter 4910 – Instructors Team self assess Team self assess Team self assess e LEAP 1101– 4910 – Open House Veeraghanta Judges rating - Identify etc. Ethics assignment f 4910 – Instructors Ethics classes – Staff Ethics essay Grades g 2260 – Cotter 3300 – Nagel & Sai 4910 – Instructors 4910 – Open House Lab 1 conclusion Final lab report Written report Judges rating – Oral h 3300 – Nagel & Sai 4910 – Instructors Gen Ed classes – Staff Impact essay Impact essay Grades i 4910 – Instructors IEEE – Staff Quality of refs # IEEE members j 3900 – Grow 3910 – Grow List speakers, attend. List speakers, attendance k 3110 – Charles 3700 – Kalla 1020 – Rasmussen Spice assignment CAD tools Matlab quiz Instructions: 1) Define a task that addresses the given outcome as precisely and as exclusively as possible. The task may be related to the course, but does not have to be. 2) Develop a rating scheme for assessing the performance of students. Suggested interpretation of scores: 0-59%: unsatisfactory 60-69%: barely acceptable 70-79%: standard 80-89%: good 90-100%: excellent However, the faculty report allows you to specify the level corresponding to a "satisfactory" score. 3) Collect examples of student work (collect 3 samples: low/average/high performance). 4) When the evaluation is completed, please fill out the faculty report (other side) and return it to Wilma.</p><p>5/8/18 EE</p>