DOCSLIB.ORG

Golden Lane Listed Building Management Guidelines Will Be a Material Consideration in Determining Listed Building Consent Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Golden Lane Listed Building Management Guidelines Updated Edition 2013 (Originally published May 2007) September 2013 Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Foreword These are the adopted listed building management guidelines for Golden Lane Estate produced by the City of London Corporation. Part of the original project brief included the establishment of a Working Party to offer guidance and advice on behalf of key interested parties. The group met regularly and included residents (both tenants and leaseholders), Members, representatives of English Heritage, the Twentieth Century Society, the Department of Community and Children’s Services and Department of Planning and Transportation. The Working Party, chaired by Deputy Mobsby, was vital to the development of the project, offering feedback on drafts of the guidelines and looking to the future of the Estate. We would like to thank its members for their contributions. Part 1 of this document was produced by the City Corporation’s Department of Planning and Transportation. Part 2 was produced by Avanti Architects Ltd, 361-373 City Road, London, EC1V 1AS The guidelines were approved by Community and Children’s Services Committee and Planning and Transportation Committee in June 2007. They have now been comprehensively reviewed, updated in the light of five years of operation on the estate and re-published as a Supplementary Planning Document. The Working Party was re-constituted for the purposes of carrying out the 2012/13 review, and has included several of the original members. , Avanti Architects have also been engaged to assist in the production of the updated edition of 2012/13. Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Contents Part 1: Introduction Plan of the Estate 1. Listed Building Management Guidelines: Background and Policy 11 2. Aims of Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines 14 3. Golden Lane Estate: Best Practice 15 4. History of Golden Lane Estate 16 5.’Special architectural and historic interest’ of Golden Lane Estate as a whole 20 6. Legislation, Listing and Listed Building Control 21 7. The Role of English Heritage 26 8. The Role of the National Amenity Societies 27 9. The Role of the City of London Corporation as Local Planning Authority 28 10. The Role of the City of London Corporation as Freeholder 29 11. How to apply for Listed Building Consent 31 12. How to apply for Planning Permission 33 13. Procedure for review of the management guidelines 34 Part 2: Detailed Guidance Illustrations and images 1. Introduction and Executive Summary 5 2. Special Interest of the Estate 15 3. Management Guidelines – Buildings 77 4. Best Practice 128 5. Conservation Strategy 148 6. Appendices 153 Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Part 1 1 Listed Building Management Guidelines: background and policy 2 Aims of the Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines 3 Golden Lane Estate: best practice 4 History of the Golden Lane Estate 5 ‘Special architectural and historic interest’ of the Golden Lane Estate as a whole 6 Legislation, Listing and Listed Building Control 7 The role of English Heritage 8 The role the National Amenity Societies 9 The role of City of London Corporation as Local Planning Authority 10 The role of the City of London Corporation as freeholder 11 How to apply to apply for Listed Building Consent 12 How to apply for Planning Permission 13 Procedure for review of the Management Guidelines Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines Map of the Golden Lane Estate and extent of listing This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright 2004. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Corporation of London 100023243 2004. INSERT ADDITIONAL PLAN SHOWING EXTERNAL TERRITORIES RELATED TO EACH BLOCK Part 1 10 UPDATE FOOTERS AS NECESSARY AT COMPLETION OF REVIEW Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines 1. Listed Building Management Guidelines: Background and Policy 1.1 Listed Building Management Guidelines are intended to be a tool for the positive, active management of historic buildings and to guide future change. They provide a structured framework from which informed decisions can be made. 1.2 Listed Building Management Guidelines aim to set out the agreements made between all parties including owners, residents, the local planning authority, English Heritage and amenity societies about the degree of change which may be acceptable within the listed buildings and their setting, although the extent to which this can be achieved is constrained by current legislation (see paragraph 1.5). 1.3 There are a number of different conservation policy instruments that may be used to assist in the management of change in listed buildings: • Conservation Plans aim to assess how the significance of a building should be retained in any future use, alteration or development. These are usually produced by specialist consultants who identify the key heritage values of the buildings and site, and then consider the various options. Conservation Plans are sometimes used to help justify or steer planning or grant applications for significant changes. • Management Agreements set out the informal position that has been agreed between individual owners and occupiers, the local planning authority, English Heritage and other relevant parties about the degree of acceptable change within a listed building, although the extent to which this can be achieved is constrained by the current legislation (see paragraph 1.5). These are usually reserved for buildings where there is a single owner of a building, such as a public or corporate owner. • Management Guidelines offer guidance on the special architectural or historic interest of a building or group of buildings, the types of changes that may or may not require listed building consent and where these may be acceptable. They may also contain advice on good practice in repair and maintenance. The ability of management guidelines to offer definitive guidance on change is constrained by current legislation (see paragraph 1.5). They are prepared in conjunction with owners, residents/occupiers, the local planning authority, English Heritage and amenity societies and are subject to formal stakeholder consultation. They are more suitable where there are a substantial number of individual stakeholders, such as housing estates, where it would be impractical to obtain the individual agreement of each owner or occupier and where it may be unrealistic to rely on enforcement as the initial instrument of change control. They may then be adopted as supplementary planning documents by the local planning authority and become a ‘material consideration’ in the consideration of individual applications. 1.4 The first listed building management guidelines were produced for the Willis Corroon Building in Ipswich in 1992. The guidelines produced since then have been predominately for post-war listed buildings or estates where there is constant pressure for change and where building owners have sought greater clarity on the extent of their freedom to make alterations without the need for formal consent. English Heritage published a guidance note in 1995 titled, ‘Developing guidelines for the management of listed buildings’ and in June 2003, with the Office of the then Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM), published the findings of a jointly commissioned study titled ‘Streamlining listed building consent: lessons from the use of management agreements’. In July 2003, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport published a consultation paper, ‘Protecting our historic environment: making the system work better’, which suggests 1 Listed Building Management Guidelines: background and policy Part 1 11 Golden Lane Estate Listed Building Management Guidelines that greater opportunity should be given to owners of listed buildings to enter into management agreements. The use of management agreements has a clear and increasing role to play in the listed building control system and in promoting constructive, on-going dialogue and mutual trust and understanding between building owners and the statutory authorities. 1.5 One of the key functions of Listed Building Management Guidelines is to provide clarification as to what types of change may or may not require listed building consent. Listed Building Management Guidelines can only be an informal consensus between all stakeholders on the acceptability of change within the building. Section 7 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 provides that listed building consent will be required where works affect the character of a listed building, irrespective of any agreements between parties regarding the acceptability of the proposals. Listed Building Management Guidelines therefore cannot remove the need to obtain listed building consent for works of alteration which affect the character of a building of special architectural and historic interest (see paragraphs 6.2-6.7). Currently it is not legally possible for local planning authorities or the Secretary of State to make a binding decision as to whether listed building consent is needed. However, guidelines can provide an assessment of the balance
Recommended publications
  • From Manufacturing Industries to a Services Economy: the Emergence of a 'New Manchester' in the Nineteen Sixties

    From Manufacturing Industries to a Services Economy: the Emergence of a 'New Manchester' in the Nineteen Sixties

    Introductory essay, Making Post-war Manchester: Visions of an Unmade City, May 2016 From Manufacturing Industries to a Services Economy: The Emergence of a ‘New Manchester’ in the Nineteen Sixties Martin Dodge, Department of Geography, University of Manchester Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture ‘Manchester is primarily an industrial city; it relies for its prosperity - more perhaps than any other town in the country - on full employment in local industries manufacturing for national and international markets.’ (Rowland Nicholas, 1945, City of Manchester Plan, p.97) ‘Between 1966 and 1972, one in three manual jobs in manufacturing were lost and one quarter of all factories and workshops closed. … Losses in manufacturing employment, however, were accompanied (although not replaced in the same numbers) by a growth in service occupations.’ (Alan Kidd, 2006, Manchester: A History, p.192) Economic Decline, Social Change, Demographic Shifts During the post-war decades Manchester went through the socially painful process of economic restructuring, switching from a labour market based primarily on manufacturing and engineering to one in which services sector employment dominated. While parts of Manchester’s economy were thriving from the late 1950s, having recovered from the deep austerity period after the War, with shipping trade into the docks at Salford buoyant and Trafford Park still a hive of activity, the ineluctable contraction of the cotton industry was a serious threat to the Manchester and regional textile economy. Despite efforts to stem the tide, the textile mills in 1 Manchester and especially in the surrounding satellite towns were closing with knock on effects on associated warehousing and distribution functions.
  • “How Do We Live?” Housing Workshop / London 2019 11Th April — 18Th April 2019 Jocelyn Froimovich, Johanna Muszbek University of Liverpool in London

    “How Do We Live?” Housing Workshop / London 2019 11Th April — 18Th April 2019 Jocelyn Froimovich, Johanna Muszbek University of Liverpool in London

    “How Do We Live?” Housing Workshop / London 2019 11th April — 18th April 2019 Jocelyn Froimovich, Johanna Muszbek University of Liverpool in London Housing design never starts afresh; housing design operates through variation, iteration, and/or mutation of prior examples. The series of workshops “How do we live?” venture into a typological investigation, with the expectation that types can provide a framework to deal with complex urban variables. By understanding the particulars in the production of a housing type, the architect can manipulate and reorganise—invent. This workshop will discuss housing types, exemplary of a particular city in its making. By looking at past exemplary projects ant today’s market offer, the goal is to observe, analyse, participate and hopefully interfere in the production system of the urban. Rather than dismissing examples of the current housing offer as “bastard” architecture, it is assumed that these housing types portray specific subjects, their living and urban conditions; the politics, policies, and socio economic factors that lead into developing a particular urban setting. Thus, the goal of the studio is to design new housing types that expand the existing housing repertoire. These new types will respond to current and future lifestyles and contribute to resolve specific urban demands. The question for this workshop is: what defines the housing crisis of London today? By forcing the notion of crisis as a methodology, each student will question a specific London housing type and propose alternative designs for each of them. For this workshop, the notion of “crisis” will be used as an operative term. “Crisis” is understood as a turning point, a time when a difficult or important decision must be made.
  • Beauty and the Brutalists: Why the Most Maligned Style in History Should Be Preserved | Financial Times

    Beauty and the Brutalists: Why the Most Maligned Style in History Should Be Preserved | Financial Times

    19-3-2021 Beauty and the Brutalists: why the most maligned style in history should be preserved | Financial Times Architecture Beauty and the Brutalists: why the most maligned style in history should be preserved Brutalist buildings around the world are endangered or lie derelict — even Donald Trump dislikes them Edwin Heathcote JANUARY 15 2021 Donald Trump might now forever be associated with classical architecture, just not necessarily in the way he would have wanted. The image of rioters storming the Capitol building in Washington, DC, this month, snapping selfies and stealing souvenirs, will be the indelible final memory of his tempestuous presidency. But one of his last acts in office was to issue an executive order that new federal buildings must be built in a classical style. What they should not be, it specified, is Brutalist. This is how it was defined: “Brutalist means the style of architecture that grew out of the early 20th-century Modernist movement that is characterised by a massive and block-like appearance with a rigid geometric style and large-scale use of exposed poured concrete.” For a big builder, Trump seems to have misunderstood the moment. Brutalism has been over as a way of building for about 40 years. No new US government buildings are in danger of being Brutalist. Perhaps he was thinking of the J Edgar Hoover Building, the FBI HQ a block away from the Trump International Hotel. The chunky concrete building has always been unpopular. https://www.ft.com/content/56088f69-cb96-4344-86c2-23d383274013 1/13 19-3-2021 Beauty and the Brutalists: why the most maligned style in history should be preserved | Financial Times The Brutalist FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, has always been unpopular © Alamy Stock Photo Not only is Brutalism no longer an applicable style, but hundreds of its best buildings are in danger of being lost forever through neglect, ignorance and laziness.
  • Design and Access Statement

    Design and Access Statement

    City of London Primary Academy Islington Design and Access Statement July 2017 Hawkins\Brown © | July 2017 | HB1677 | Design and Access Statement 2 City of London Corporation Islington Town Hall North Wing 222 Upper Street Guildhall London EC2P 2EJ N1 1XR [email protected] +44 (0) 20 7606 3030 +44 (0 20 7527 2000 Architect MEP/Structural Consultants Project Manager Planning Consultant Cost Consultant 159 St John Street 33 Bowling Green Lane Arcadis House 5 Bolton Street One New Change London London 34 York Way London London EC1V 4QJ EC1R 0BJ London W1J 8BA EC4M 9AF [email protected] [email protected] N1 9AB +44 (0) 20 7336 8030 +44 (0) 20 3824 6600 [email protected] +44 (0) 20 7493 4002 +44 (0) 20 7544 4000 +44 (0) 7812 2000 Hawkins\Brown © | July 2017 | HB1677 | Design and Access Statement 3 Design and Access Statement Document control and issue sheet Authorisation Reviewed by Name Project role Signature Date Hawkins\Brown © | July 2017 | HB1677 | Design and Access Statement 4 Contents Executive Summary Incorporating Comments 5.5 Development of residential 7.0 Landscape Proposals (B|D Landscape) 1.0 Introduction 5.6 Residential massing development: DRP03 5.7 Residential typology 7.1 Landscape Report 1.1 Project Background 5.8 Urban realm design development 1.2 The Applicant 5.9 Model development 8.0 Inclusive Design and Access 2.0 Brief 6.0 Design Proposals 8.1 Pedestrian access and movement 8.2 Vehicular access, movement and deliveries 2.1 Project Objectives 6.0 8.3 Vehicle parking/Bicycle Storage 2.2 Residential Brief 8.4
  • Robin Hood Yard Kindle

    Robin Hood Yard Kindle

    ROBIN HOOD YARD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Mark Sanderson | 288 pages | 23 Mar 2015 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780007296842 | English | London, United Kingdom Robin Hood Yard PDF Book A ginger-haired man was being dragged to his feet by two policemen. They were on parade, not on duty. Greater London Barking and Dagenham Becontree. The maisonettes were designed with the bedrooms facing inwards shielding the residents from the traffic noise. Seller Inventory B Community Reviews. A well near the road between Threshfield and Kilnsey in Wharfedale. I don't have much more to say. The northern angle tower of the city wall, recorded in and A fishing village on the north side of the bay of the same name. Watling Estate. A tumulus in Talbot Woods to the north of Meyrick Park. The Liberty of the Rolls comprised the precincts of this house and chapel, and the privileges claimed may have originated in the privileges accorded to the House of Converts by charter of Henry III. The "streets in the sky" concept often did not work in practice. Throsby, , II, About the Author : Mark Sanderson is a journalist. Cover design by Mavrodesign. A hamlet at a crossroads one mile S. There is a Loxley in W. Occurs, within Helsington chapelry, on the Ordnance Survey Map. Seller Inventory AWC The absence from Lockie is especially suggestive due to its coverage and the fact that John Lockie had long and detailed first-hand experience of his chosen topic: he was a building inspector for a fire insurance company who meticulously noted down the number of "doors" one must pass before arriving at a given side street this was before proper numbering was introduced.
  • C20 CA Project Short Reports on Potential Conservation Areas

    C20 CA Project Short Reports on Potential Conservation Areas

    Conservation Areas Project Potential Conservation Areas Short Reports December 2017 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction Section 10.3.2 of the Brief for the Twentieth Century Society Conservation Areas Project requires the research consultants ‘to prepare summaries of around 50 areas that have potential for future conservation area status, providing information on their location, the architect, date of construction, borough, one or two images and a short paragraph about the site’. These short reports are listed in Section 2.0 below, and the full reports follow, in numerical order. All the short reports follow a standard format which was agreed by the Steering Group for the Project (see appendix 3 of the Scoping Report). The reports are intended principally as identifiers not as full descriptions. In line with the research strategy, they are the result of a desk-based assessment. The historic information is derived mainly from secondary sources and the pictures are taken largely from the Web (and no copyright clearance for future publication has been obtained). No specific boundaries are suggested for the potential conservation areas because any more formal proposals clearly need to be based on thorough research and site inspection. 2.0 List of Potential Conservation Areas Historic County Area Name Local Planning Record Authority Number Berkshire Blossom Avenue, Theale West Berkshire 01 Buckinghamshire Energy World Milton Keynes 02 Buckinghamshire Woolstone Milton Keynes 03 Cheshire The Brow, Runcorn Halton 04 Devon Sladnor Park Torquay 05 Dorset
  • Golden Lane Estate

    Golden Lane Estate

    )XWXUH&LWLHV Schiano-Phan, R, et al. 2018. Spatial Delight and Environmental Performance of Modernist Architecture in London – Golden Lane Estate. Future Cities and DQG(QYLURQPHQW Environment, 4(1): 16, 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.47 TECHNICAL ARTICLE Spatial Delight and Environmental Performance of Modernist Architecture in London – Golden Lane Estate Rosa Schiano-Phan*, Benson Lau*, Deependra Pourel† and Sharmeen Khan-Phatan* This paper investigated the spatial delight and environmental performance of the open spaces and two selected apartments in the modernist buildings at Golden Lane Estate built after the 2nd World War, between 1952 and 1961. This estate is a Grade II listed, high density, low cost housing complex designed by three young architects: Peter Chamberlin, Geoffrey Powell and Christof Bon. It was built over a bombed site and well embraced the post-war modern architecture ethos, environmental considerations and inclusion of social facilities and landscaped communal spaces. Selected communal open spaces and two apartments in different building blocks with similar attributes were chosen for this study. However, one apartment has been refurbished with internal insulation and secondary glazing for improving the comfort conditions. Through fieldwork, which included subjective observation of the spatial quality of both out- door and indoor spaces, on-site monitoring and interview of the building occupants, first-hand information on the environmental and comfort conditions inside the apartments were obtained. Through performance based theoretical analysis, archival research and observations, the spatial quality and comfort conditions in the apartments and their energy demand were critically assessed. The research findings indicate that the design of the communal outdoor spaces in the Golden Lane Estate were well thought through and the spacing between the building blocks responded well to the requirements of spatial delight, solar and daylight access and outdoor environmental comfort.
  • South Bank Arts Centre

    South Bank Arts Centre

    PUBLIC SPACE AND THE ROLE OF THE ARCHITECT London Modernist Case Study Briefing (c. 2016 FABE Research Team, University of Westminster) SOUTH BANK ARTS CENTRE CONTENTS 1. CHRONOLOGY 3 2. POLICY AND IDEOLOGY 4 3. AGENTS 6 4. BRIEF 8 5. DESIGN 10 6. MATERIALS/ CONSTRUCTION 14 7. RECEPTION 16 BIBLIOGRAPHY 19 PROJECT INFORMATION Case Study: The South Bank Arts Centre (Hayward Gallery, Queen Elizabeth Hall, and the Purcell Room), Belvedere Road, London SE1 8XX Dates: 1960 - 1968 (Queen Elizabeth Hall and Purcell Room opened March 1967; Hayward Gallery opened October 1968) Architects: Norman Engleback (lead architect), E.J. Blyth, J.A. Roberts, W.J. Sutherland, Ron Herron, Warren Chalk, Dennis Crompton, John Attenborough, Bryn Jones (Hubert Bennett was the Architect to the GLC at the time.) Client: The London County Council and the Arts Council Contractors: Higgs and Hill Ltd., with Ove Arup & Partners as structural engineers and over 100 sub-contractors. Financing: London County Council (public funding) Site area: 21 acre site (Hayward Gallery ~ 20,000 sq ft. QEH ~ 13,000 sq ft) Tender price: Quoted £3.7 million (including the refurbishment of the Royal Festival Hall), actual approximately £7 million, of which £800,000 for the Hayward Gallery. 2 1. CHRONOLOGY 1943 Patrick Abercrombie and J.H. Forshaw identified the South Bank as a comprehensive development area in the County of London Plan (1943). 1948 Labour Government’s Clement Attlee announced Festival of Britain as ‘tonic to the nation’. 1949 Construction began on the Royal Festival Hall and the Queen’s Walk, a public boulevard and embankment extending from the County Hall to Waterloo Bridge.
  • Making Post-War Manchester: Visions of an Unmade City

    Making Post-War Manchester: Visions of an Unmade City

    Making post-war Manchester: visions of an unmade city Making post-war Manchester: visions of an unmade city 03 June - 24 June 2016 Manchester Technology Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester Exhibition Catalogue Acknowledgements The workshop and exhibition could not have been achieved without Finally, I should thank Martin Dodge for his dedication to this subject area the help and generosity of a number of individuals. First, we should and the rigour he has brought to my academic practice as well as the thank Dr. Kevin Tan of Manchester Metropolitan University, who gave fun we have had along the way uncovering some of these architectural up considerable amounts of his own time to both teach and tutor the gems. Of course, none of this could have been achieved without the students through the game environments. He went above and beyond intelligent, articulate and talented students of our School: anything expected of him when I asked him to act as consultant and gained the status of ‘legend’ amongst the students! Eddy Rhead and Shahrukh Ahmed Jack Hale of the Modernist Society were project partners and came Adam Brennan in to provide feedback to the students during the development of their Polys Christofi designs. They have also organised and marketed the exhibition. Scott Polly Clements Miller and Jim Backhouse have ably directed the production of the Florence Cooke-Steed ‘mega-plinth’ for the computers and its funding was kindly signed off by Bruna Da Silva Dr. Ray Lucas of the Manchester School of Architecture. Paul Aldcroft, Chris Doherty Technical Team Leader in the Faculty of Science and Engineering at Richard Durber MMU has been vital in the provision of advice and support for the digital Arron El-Ammar components of the exhibition.
  • Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive Storytelling, Heritage-Led Stakeholder Engagement, and Community Fatigue

    Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive Storytelling, Heritage-Led Stakeholder Engagement, and Community Fatigue

    Stories in the Sky VR: Immersive storytelling, heritage-led stakeholder engagement, and community fatigue Joseph Thomas Empsall Masters by Research University of York Archaeology September 2020 Abstract Stories in the Sky VR was a prototype immersive storytelling experience focusing on Park Hill, Sheffield. The project explored the way that immersive technologies can be used as part of heritage-led community engagement, as a means to articulate intangible heritage. Park Hill represents one of the most divisive buildings in the country; it was regarded as a success in the 1960s, saw a period of dramatic decline in the 1980s and 1990s, and is currently being regenerated by Urban Splash, following the estate’s Grade II* listing in 1998. Through its redevelopment, Park Hill has not only seen an overhaul in its design, but also in the community that now calls the estate home, having transitioned from council estate to gentrified flats. Park Hill represented an ideal testing ground to investigate the potential of immersive technologies, with storytelling embedded in these “flats of the future” since their inception. While the listing details the estate’s value derives from its innovative design, Park Hill also has strong roots in the intangible, through its sense of enduring community, identities, and experiences. Stories in the Sky VR attempted to implement a “bottom-up” approach, giving the stakeholders more control over the narrative and nature of the immersive experience. Ultimately, this proved difficult to achieve, with the fatigue of interviews and tourism having soured large-scale interest in these types of projects. In place of new interviews, previously recorded oral testimonies were utilised to shape the focus of the immersive experience.
  • Imaginative Place in Literary Research and Teaching Jason Finch

    Imaginative Place in Literary Research and Teaching Jason Finch

    Deep Locational Criticism: Imaginative Place in Literary Research and Teaching Jason Finch 1 Table of Contents Series Editor’s Preface Acknowledgements List of Images and Maps Chapter 1. Introduction A Distinctive Activity Organization of the Work Preliminaries Place versus Space? Casey and Certeau Contextualism and Meta-Contextualism Fascism and the Problem of Place Working Principles Inside and Outside Texts Interactivity, Interdependence and the Lived Body Scale, Limits, Technologies Topographic not Synoptic Place First Not Two but Three Terminology The Landscape Alternative 2 The Case for Location Imaginative Place Experience Methodology A Triad Zooming Scholarly, Creative and Cartographic Resources Summing Up Chapter 2. Applications in Research and Pedagogy Locating Two Poets Gwendolyn Brooks in “Bronzeville” and Chicago Christina Rossetti in London (95) The Intratextual Landscape of a Single Work of Literature: Bleak House Hillis Miller and Dickens: A Study in Topographic Criticism Mapping Novels in the Head A Line Running Down through England Interim Conclusion Two Pedagogic Forays into the Decayed Inner City A Fulham Novel: Photographs and Cultural Difference 39.289372°N, 76.646848°W: The Imaginative Place Project 3 Conclusion: Better Mental Mapping Chapter 3. The Heideggerian Fourfold and a Shakespeare Play Reclaiming Heidegger for Literary Studies Mysticism, Fascism and Deconstruction Literature, Art and Interaction The Fourfold of Henry IV, Part Two Conclusion: Multiple Temporalities, Multiple Fourfolds Chapter 4. The Precise Spot Occupied by a Renaissance Playhouse Theatre and Thing Afterlives and Repeated Returns The Roaring Girl on London’s Peripheries A Guide for the Provincial Gallant Liberties, Fields, Suburbs and Beyond The Intermediate Fortune Time Travel Conclusion: Context and Space Revisited Chapter 5.
  • Download (410Kb)

    Download (410Kb)

    Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/129413 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected]. warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Paper title: «Planning the New Model Society: London's post-War urban and architectural evolution 1945-1980» Event: “Transferts, espaces et rayonnement culturels dans les capitales européennes depuis 1945: Berlin, Londres, Madrid, Paris” (2017-2019), Ministère de la Culture et des Communications, Paris, France, 9th June 2017.