Review & Evaluation of Groundwater Contamination & Proposed Remediation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review & Evaluation of Groundwater Contamination & Proposed Remediation -1 r r n CONFIDENTIAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION r OF GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION AND PROPOSED REMEDIATION AT THE REILLY TAR SITE, ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA r. c Prepared by L Dr. James W. Mercer GeoTrans, inc. 209 Elden Street Herndon, Virginia 22070 [ Report to L U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region V, Remedial Response Branch (5HR-13) Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 1984 L ieoT L GEOTRANS, INC. lrran« s P.O. Box 2550 Reston.Virginia 22090 USA (703)435-4400 EPA Region 5 Recorcte Ctr. i inn minium iflBiniiiiiiiw L 234542 r. CONFIDENTIAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION AND PROPOSED REMEDIATION AT THE REILLY TAR SITE, ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA Prepared By Dr. James W. Mercer GeoTrans, Inc. 209 El den Street Herndon, Virginia 22070 Report To U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region V, Remedial Response Branch (5HR-13) Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 1.2 SITE HISTORY 2 2.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 2.1 CONCLUSIONS 4 2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 3.0 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY 7 3.1 GEOLOGY 7 3.1.1 Stratigraphy 7 3.1.2 Geomorphic Features 14 3.2 GROUND-WATER HYDROLOGY 17 3.2.1 Flow Directions 17 3.2.1.1 Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer 17 3.2.1.2 Ironton-Galesville Aquifer 25 3.2.1.3 Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer 25 3.2.1.4 St. Peter Aquifer 29 3.2.1.5 Drift-Platteville Aquifers 33 3.2.1.6 Vertical Gradients 35 3.2.2 Flow Properties 35 3.3 CHEMISTRY 39 4.0 GROUND-WATER MODELING 42 4.1 CODE SELECTED 42 4.2 GEOMETRY 43 4.2.1 Layering 43 4.2.2 Boundary Conditions 47 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4.3 HISTORY MATCHING 47 4.3.1 Wells 48 4.3.2 Flow Parameters 49 4.3.3 Results 49 4.4 PREDICTIVE SIMULATION WITH REMEDIATION 57 5.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS 60 5.1 MULTIAQUIFER WELLS 60 5.1.1 Investigation 60 5.1.2 Remedy 61 5.2 NEAR-SURFACE CONTAMINATION 61 5.2.1 Deed Restrictions 61 5.2.2 Louisiana Avenue/Highway 7 61 Intersection Construction 5.3 DRIFT AQUIFER 62 5.3.1 Source Control 62 5.3.2 Gradient Control 62 5.3.3 Monitoring 62 5.3.4 Contingencies 63 5.3.5 Mitigated Impacts 63 5.4 PLATTEVILLE AQUIFER 63 5.4.1 Source Control 63 5.4.2 Gradient Control 63 5.4.3 Monitoring 64 5.4.4 Contingencies 64 5.4.5 Mitigated Impacts 64 5.5 ST. PETER AQUIFER 64 5.5.1 Source Control 64 5.5.2 Gradient Control 64 5.5.3 Monitoring 65 5.5.4 Contingencies 65 5.5.5 Mitigated Impacts 65 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.6 PRAIRIE DU CHIEN-JORDAN AQUIFER 65 5.6.1 Source Control 65 5.6.2 Gradient Control 66 5.6.3 Monitoring 66 5.6.4 Drinking Water 66 5.6.5 Contingencies 67 5.6.6 Mitigated Impacts 67 5.7 IRONTON-GALESVILLE AQUIFER 67 5.7.1 Source Control 67 5.7.2 Gradient Control 68 5.7.3 Monitoring 68 5.7.4 Contingencies 68 5.7.5 Mitigated Impacts 68 5.8 MOUNT SIMON-HINCKLEY AQUIFER 68 5.8.1 Source Control 68 5.8.2 Gradient Control 68 5.8.3 Monitoring 69 5.8.4 Contingencies 69 5.8.5 Mitigated Impacts 69 6.0 REFERENCES 70 7.0 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 72 LIST OF FIGURES Number Legend Page 1.1 Location of former plant, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 3 (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.1 Preliminary structural contours at the top of the 11 Mount Simon-Hinckley aquifer, where contour interval is 40 feet and datum is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.2 Preliminary structural contours at the top of the 12 Ironton-Galesville aquifer, where contour interval is 40 feet and datum is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.3 Preliminary structure contours at the top of the 13 Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer, where contour interval is 40 feet and datum is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.4 Preliminary structure contours at the top of bedrock, 15 where contour interval is 100 feet and datum is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.5 Preliminary bedrock geology, Minneapolis South and 16 Hopkin's quadrangles (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). 3.6 Hydrogeologic section through Minneapolis and St. Paul 18 (from Horn, 1983). Section trace not shown, but lies in an approximate east-west direction. 3.7 Potentiometric surface for the Mount Simon-Hinckley 19 aquifer based on water levels measured during January- March 1971 (from Schoenberg, 1984). 3.8 Potentiometric surface for the Mount Simon-Hinckley 20 aquifer based on water levels measured during January- February 1980 (from Schoenberg, 1984). 3.9 Potentiometric surface for the Mount Simon-Hinckley 21 aquifer based on water levels measured during August 1980 (from Schoenberg, 1984). 3.10 Hydrograph showing water level changes in the 24 Mount Simon-Hinckley aquifer in well number 117N21W32DAD01 in Edina, MN (from Schoenberg, 1984). Well location shown in Figures 3.7 to 3.9. LIST OF FIGURES I \ ' Number Legend Page f 3.11 Potentiometric surface for the Prairie du Chien- 26 i Jordan aquifer based on water levels measured during January-March 1971 (from Schoenberg, 1984). , 3.12 Potentiometric surface for the Prairie du Chien- 27 ! Jordan aquifer based on water levels measured during January-February 1980 (from Schoenberg, 1984). 1 3.13 Potentiometric surface for the Prairie du Chien- 28 Jordan aquifer based on water levels measured during j August 1980 (from Schoenberg, 1984). 3.14 Hydrograph showing water level changes in the Prairie 31 , du Chien-Jordan aquifer in well number 117N21W16CCA01 in east-central Hennepin County, MN (from Schoenberg, ' 1984). Well location shown in Figures 3.11 to 3.13. 3.15 Potentiometric surface for the St. Peter aquifer based 32 ; on water levels measured during the winter of 1970-1971 (from Norvitch et al., 1974). 3.16 Generalized potentiometric surface for the drift 34 aquifer based on water levels measured on June 5, 1979 (from Ehrlich et al., 1982). Contours are in meters. 4.1 Map showing boundaries used by ERT and U.S.G.S. 44 (after ERT, 1983). i 4.2 Comparison of calibrated ERT model results with observed 54 data for the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer (from ERT, 1983). 4.3 Map showing the location of private and industrial wells 56 in the vicinity of the Reilly Tar site (from Hult and Schoenberg, 1984). VI LIST OF TABLES Number Legend Page 3.1 Stratigraphic Section Underlying Reilly Tar Site 8 (From Hult and Schoenberg, 1984) 3.2 Average Daily Pumpage From the Mount Simon-Hinckley 23 Aquifer, 1970-1979 (From Schoenberg, 1984) 3.3 Annual Daily Pumpage From the Prairie du Chien-Jordan 30 Aquifer, 1970-1979 (From Schoenberg, 1984) 3.4 Flow Properties of the Various Units Beneath the 36 Reilly Tar Site 4.1 Vertical Aquifer Geometry Used in the ERT Model 45 4.2 Vertical Aquifer Geometry Used in the U.S.G.S. Model 46 4.3 Values of U.S.G.S. Hydrologic Properties "50 (After Stark and Hult, 1984) 4.4 Values of ERT Model Hydrologic Properties 51 (After ERT, 1983) 4.5 Values Used by ERT to Compute Travel Times 52 4.6 Withdrawal Rates for Remedial Action Simulation 58 (From Stark and Hult, 1984) VII 1 REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION AND PROPOSED REMEDIATION AT THE REILLY'TAR SITE, I ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA ii | 1.0 INTRODUCTION r This section outlines the purpose and scope of work. In addition, ' for completeness and to help highlight the problem, a brief site history ! is provided. \!. 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE In November 1984, GeoTrans, Inc. began an investigation of the ' Reilly Tar site in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, for purposes of trial preparation. The work was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through a subcontract with PRC Engineering. The work was ) performed in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Justice, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Minnesota Attorney General's Office. The objectives of this investigation were, in part, to (1) review site « and basin-wide hydrogeologic data, (2) develop a conceptualization of site hydrology, (3) evaluate ground-water modeling performed at the site \ using the conceptualization of site hydrology as a basis, and (4) use all of the above to evaluate proposed site remediation. | The purpose of this report is to concisely summarize findings relevant to the objectives stated above. The report includes conclusions and recommendations, a review of site hydrogeology, and a i review of ground-water modeling, including proposed site remediation. L Where possible, conclusions have been summarized with supporting facts/ assumptions and data/reference sources. Comments have been restricted to those that concern hydrogeology. 1.2 SITE HISTORY Between 1917 and 1972, a coal-tar distillation and wood-preserving plant was operated by Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (RT&CC) on an | 80-acre site in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as shown in Figure 1.1. Note the location of the former plant site, as it will be used for reference ir 1 in later figures. Coal-tar derivatives from this operation have j contaminated glacial drift and bedrock aquifers in this area (Hult and Schoenberg, 1984).
Recommended publications
  • A Hydrogeologic and Mapping Investigation of the St. Lawrence Formation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Executive Summary T
    Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) Open File Report 06-04 (Open File Reports are not subjected to conventional MGS editorial standards) A HYDROGEOLOGIC AND MAPPING INVESTIGATION OF THE ST. LAWRENCE FORMATION IN THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Runkel, A.C., Mossler, J.H., Tipping, R.G., and Bauer, E.J. Minnesota Geological Survey 2642 University Ave W., St. Paul, Minnesota 55114-1057 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the results of a two year project conducted by the Minnesota Geological Survey to map the Upper Cambrian St. Lawrence Formation and investigate its hydrologic properties in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area (TCMA). Funding was provided by the Minnesota Department of Health. Final products are a map delivered in electronic format that can be used with Arcview 3.2 GIS software, and this informal report. Our hydrogeologic study indicates that the St. Lawrence Formation commonly has a moderate to high horizontal hydraulic conductivity across all of the study area. In conditions of shallow burial beneath younger bedrock it is most similar in the development of secondary pores and measured hydraulic properties to fractured carbonate rock aquifers. Discrete intervals with secondary pores have a high horizontal hydraulic conductivity whereas rock between these intervals are orders of magnitude lower in conductivity. The properties of the St. Lawrence Formation in a vertical direction are not as well- understood, but available data are consistent with the traditional classification of the formation as an aquitard. However, the integrity of the formation as an aquitard in a vertical direction, particularly under conditions of shallow burial such as where it is uppermost bedrock, has not been rigorously tested, and may be markedly variable across the TCMA.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Atlas of Blue Earth County, Minnesota
    Prepared and Published with the Support of COUNTY ATLAS SERIES THE BLUE EARTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND ATLAS C-26, PART A MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY the Minnesota ENVironment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Blue Earth County Harvey Thorleifson, Director as recommended by the LEGislatiVE-CitiZen Commission on Minnesota Resources Plate 2—Bedrock Geology NIC OLL ET COU NTY 7 Minnesota B BEDROCK GEOLOGY Ka 44°15' N. 285 300 R. 29 W. Kd m STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN River 285 By 240 s 94° W. e i Lithostratigraphic r Composite natural gamma log 255 NICOLLET LE SUEUR COUNTY R. 26 W. COUNTY R. 25 W. e unit S 270 - e 315 Increasing count 330 Era m Lithology Kd e T. 109 N. sl Os 315 Julia R. Steenberg t Group, 0 100 s 24 Map symbol 19 y 300 300 24 24 Formation 270 lr 19 S API-G units Oo Thickness (in feet) 300 River 285 LIME JAMESTOWN 345 94°15' W. 255 Kd Wita Kd Creek 315 2012 315 )68 j Kd Lake j Dakota Kd 5-90 m.y.) Upper Formation Os Y 300 (99.6-93.5 T Duck Cretaceous 300 lr Morgan Os Lake N T. 109 N. CAMBRIA U 315 O 300 Minnesota 240 Ballantyne C LOCATION DIAGRAM Oo 300 Lake R 270 Madison MESOZOIC R. 28 W. U 31 Kd 300 31 Oo Unnamed Ka Os E Kd 30-90 36 31 Eagle Lake lr lr 36 315 36 U 36 S Cretaceous 300 ) 31 300 22 (112-93.5 m.y.) (112-93.5 Gilfillin 315 E Lower to Upper Lake L Judson Lake 315 300 lr 240 1 6 Y 6 240 Os Platteville Formation 255 315 T Opg 6 Madison 5-20 1 1 N 6 Glenwood Formation Ph 1 255 U sl 255 1 CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS O )60 Upper 315 315 C Lake A j (450 m.y.) 315 C ? E Kd Upper Cretaceous 285 14 Kd S Lithology Key 315 A St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology and Stratigraphy of the Dakota Formation in Northwest Iowa
    WATER SUPPLY HYDROGEOLOGY AND J.A. MUNTER BULLETIN G.A. LUDVIGSON NUMBER 13 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE B.J. BUNKER 1983 DAKOTA FORMATION IN NORTHWEST IOWA Iowa Geological Survey Donald L. Koch State Geologist and Director 123 North Capitol Street Iowa City, Iowa 52242 IOWA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY BULLETIN NO. 13 1983 HYDROGEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE DAKOTA FORMATION IN NORTHWEST IOWA J. A. Munter G. A. Ludvigson B. J. Bunker Iowa Geological Survey Iowa Geological Survey Donald L. Koch Director and State Geologist 123 North Capitol Street Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Foreword An assessment of the quantity and quality of water available from the Dakota (Sandstone) Formation 1n northwest Iowa is presented in this report. The as sessment was undertaken to provide quantitative information on the hydrology of the Dakota aquifer system to the Iowa Natural Resources Council for alloca tion of water for irrigation, largely as a consequence of the 1976-77 drought. Most area wells for domestic, livestock, and irrigation purposes only partial ly penetrated the Dakota Formation. Consequently, the long-term effects of significant increases in water withdrawals could not be assessed on the basis of existing wells. Acquisition of new data was based upon a drilling program designed to penetrate the entire sequence of Dakota sediments at key loca tions, after a thorough inventory and analysis of existing data. Definition of the distribution, thickness, and lateral and vertical changes in composition of the Dakota Formation has permitted the recognition of two mem bers. Additionally, Identification of the rock units that underlie the Dakota Formation has contributed greatly to our knowledge of the regional geology of northwest Iowa and the upper midwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Properties of St. Peter Sandstone a Comparison of Field and Laboratory Results a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of T
    MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ST. PETER SANDSTONE A COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY RESULTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY MICHAEL EUGENE DITTES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DECEMBER, 2015 This thesis contains previously published material (Appendix E) in the “Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering” © 2002 ASCE. All other material © 2015 Michael E. Dittes All Rights Reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my thanks to those, who without their help I would not have been able to bring this project to completion. First and foremost, I thank Professor Joseph Labuz who took a chance on me, by offering me a TA-ship. Through my time in school, Joe helped me stay focused when I started to move off on tangents, offered timely advice, and over the years has become much more than my advisor. I am proud to think of him as a friend. Professors Andrew Drescher and Peter Huddleston also deserve special thanks for providing critical review of my work, and agreeing to sit on my thesis committee. To Ms. Tiffany Ralston who had an uncanny way of knowing what I needed to do, and how, before I knew myself. To Charles Nelson who helped me streamline my thesis project and helped me gain access to the Minnesota Library Archives construction site. To my fellow graduate students with whom I debated, joked and laughed, you helped me see things that I was missing. Your input was invaluable and you have my deep appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Condition of Minnesota's Groundwater, 2007-2011
    The Condition of Minnesota’s Groundwater, 2007 - 2011 August 2013 Authors Sharon Kroening Mark Ferrey The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by Acknowledgements using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our website for The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency thanks the more information. following individuals for their reviews of this report. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Byron Adams, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Dr. Melinda Erickson, US Geological Survey John Hines, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Brennon Schaefer, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Andrew Streitz, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Bill VanRyswyk, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Dave Wall, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency also thanks the following for the long hours of sampling required for this study: David Duffey, Gerald Flom, Mark Lunda, Meghan McGinn, and Sophia Vaughan Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-am1-06 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the New Richmond Sandstone, Prairie Du Chien Group, Southeastern Minnesota
    The Geology of the New Richmond Sandstone, Prairie du Chien Group, Southeastern Minnesota Cristina Robins Senior Integrative Exercise March 9, 2005 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree, Carleton College, Northfield, MN, USA i The Geology of the New Richmond Sandstone, Prairie du Chien Group, Southeastern Minnesota Cristina Robins Carleton College Senior Integrative Exercise March 9, 2004 Advisor: Dr. Clint Cowan, Carleton College Abstract: This study examines the New Richmond Sandstone, a relatively unknown heterolithic assemblage of sandstone, carbonate, and shale that is commonly considered part of the Shakopee formation of the Prairie du Chien group. Stratigraphic columns constructed from seven outcrops of the New Richmond in southeastern Minnesota and northeastern Iowa show that it varies between 7 m and 20 m in thickness within the study area and consists of two facies: the Prairie Island and the Root Valley. Previous studies found that the New Richmond was deposited in part through eolian action. SEM studies of individual grains did not confirm this. Keywords: New Richmond, sandstone, Shakopee, Prairie du Chien, Ordovician, stratigraphy, SEM data, Minnesota ii Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 1 The Prairie du Chien Group .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History of Pikes Peak State Park, Clayton County, Iowa ______
    THE NATURAL HISTORY OF PIKES PEAK STATE PARK, CLAYTON COUNTY, IOWA ___________________________________________________ edited by Raymond R. Anderson Geological Society of Iowa ______________________________________ November 4, 2000 Guidebook 70 Cover photograph: Photograph of a portion of the boardwalk trail near Bridal Veil Falls in Pikes Peak State Park. The water falls over a ledge of dolomite in the McGregor Member of the Platteville Formation that casts the dark shadow in the center of the photo. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF PIKES PEAK STATE PARK CLAYTON COUNTY, IOWA Edited by: Raymond R. Anderson and Bill J. Bunker Iowa Department Natural Resources Geological Survey Bureau Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1319 with contributions by: Kim Bogenschutz William Green John Pearson Iowa Dept. Natural Resources Office of the State Archaeologist Parks, Rec. & Preserves Division Wildlife Research Station 700 Clinton Street Building Iowa Dept. Natural Resources 1436 255th Street Iowa City IA 52242-1030 Des Moines, IA 50319 Boone, IA 50036 Richard Langel Chris Schneider Scott Carpenter Iowa Dept. Natural Resources Dept. of Geological Sciences Department of Geoscience Geological Survey Bureau Univ. of Texas at Austin The University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242-1319 Austin, TX 78712 Iowa City, IA 52242-1379 John Lindell Elizabeth Smith Norlene Emerson U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Department of Geosciences Dept. of Geology & Geophysics Upper Mississippi Refuge University of Massachusetts University of Wisconsin- Madison McGregor District Office Amherst, MA 01003 Madison WI 53706 McGregor, IA 52157 Stephanie Tassier-Surine Jim Farnsworth Greg A. Ludvigson Iowa Dept. Natural Resources Parks, Rec. & Preserves Division Iowa Dept. Natural Resources Geological Survey Bureau Iowa Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Stratigraphic Nomenclature for Wisconsin (Wisconsin
    UNIVERSITY EXTENSION The University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Information Circular Number 8 Paleozoic Stratigraphic Nomenclature For Wisconsin By Meredith E. Ostrom"'" INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic stratigraphic nomenclature shown in the Oronto a Precambrian age and selected the basal contact column is a part of a broad program of the Wisconsin at the top of the uppermost volcanic bed. It is now known Geological and Natural History Survey to re-examine the that the Oronto is unconformable with older rocks in some Paleozoic rocks of Wisconsin and is a response to the needs areas as for example at Fond du Lac, Minnesota, where of geologists, hydrologists and the mineral industry. The the Outer Conglomerate and Nonesuch Shale are missing column was preceded by studies of pre-Cincinnatian cyclical and the younger Freda Sandstone rests on the Thompson sedimentation in the upper Mississippi valley area (Ostrom, Slate (Raasch, 1950; Goldich et ai, 1961). An unconformity 1964), Cambro-Ordovician stratigraphy of southwestern at the upper contact in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan Wisconsin (Ostrom, 1965) and Cambrian stratigraphy in has been postulated by Hamblin (1961) and in northwestern western Wisconsin (Ostrom, 1966). Wisconsin wlle're Atwater and Clement (1935) describe un­ A major problem of correlation is the tracing of outcrop conformities between flat-lying quartz sandstone (either formations into the subsurface. Outcrop definitions of Mt. Simon, Bayfield, or Hinckley) and older westward formations based chiefly on paleontology can rarely, if dipping Keweenawan volcanics and arkosic sandstone. ever, be extended into the subsurface of Wisconsin because From the above data it would appear that arkosic fossils are usually scarce or absent and their fragments cari rocks of the Oronto Group are unconformable with both seldom be recognized in drill cuttings.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Pennsylvanian Stratigraphy of Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of 12-1934 PRE-PENNSYLVANIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF NEBRASKA Alvin Leonard Lugn University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Lugn, Alvin Leonard, "PRE-PENNSYLVANIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF NEBRASKA" (1934). Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 360. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/360 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS VOL. 18. NO 12 'DECEMBER, 1934). PP 1597-1631, 9 FIGS PRE-PENNSYLVANIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF NEBRASKA1 A. L. LUGN2 liincoln, Nebraska ABSTRACT Sioux quartzite, granite, and schistose metamorphic rocks have been recognized in the pre-Cambrian. The present irregularities, the "basins and highs," on the pre- Cambrian surface are the result of erosion and a long structural history. In general succeedingly younger rocks rest unconformably by overlap against the pre-Cambrian "highs." The principal erosional and structural "highs" are: the "Nemaha moun­ tains," the Cambridge anticline, the Chadron dome, and the Sioux Falls area. "Basins," or saddle-like depressions, occur on the pre-Cambrian surface between the "highs." The largest of these trends from southeast to northwest across the central part of Nebraska. The history of each ridge or "high" is more or less individualistic, but it seems certain that the structural framework of Nebraska came into existence in late pre-Cambrian time and has dominated the structural and depositional history of the state ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Winneshiek County
    GEOLOGY OF WINNESHIEK COUNTY. BY SAMUEL CALVIN. • GEOLOGY OF WINNESHIEK COUNTY. BY SAMUEL CALVIN. CONTENTS. PA.GE . Introduction . .. " .. ... .. ..... ....... ....... .. .. , ...... ... .. .. ... ... 43 Geographic and Geologic Rt:lations . .. .. ...... ...... .. 43 Area.. .............. .. .. .. ........... ..... .... ... .. ....... .. 43 Boundaries . ... .. ... ......... .. .... .... ... ..... ..... 43 Relations to topographic areas . .. ..... .. ... .... .. ... 43 Relations to dist~ibution of geological formations .... .. ... 44 Previous geological work . .... .. ..... ... .. ......... 45 PhYliography .... .. ........ ....• , . .. .... ... ....... 47 Topography. .. .. .. ... 47 Preglacial topography. ... .... ..... .... .. .. .. ... ... 47 Topographic effects of the several rock formations.... ... 48 Topography controlled by Pleistocene deposits......... .. ..... 53 The area of Kansas drift. .. ... ... .. .. ... ... ..... 53 The Iowan-Kansas border. .. 54 The area of Iowan drift . , ....... .. .. .. .. .... .... ... 54 Topography due to recent shifting of mantle rocks. ....... 55 The larger topographic features. .. .......... .. ... .. ... ... 56 The Cresco-Calmar ridge. .. ... .. .... ......... .... 56 Drainage ba&in of the Ox.Eota, or Upper Iowa river..... .. 56 Drainage basin of the Yellow river.... •. .... .. ..... .. .... 56 Drainage basin of the Turkey river. .. ... .. .. ....... 56 Elevations.... .......... .. .... .. .. .... .. .. .... .. ... 56 Drainage ..... ... .... .. ... .................. ........ '" 57 The Oneota, or
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Lithostratigraphic Nomenclature for Minnesota
    MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRISCILLA C. GREW, Director PALEOZOIC LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MINNESOTA John H. Mossier Report of Investigations 36 ISSN 0076-9177 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Saint Paul - 1987 PALEOZOIC LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FOR MINNESOTA CONTENTS Abstract. Structural and sedimentological framework • Cambrian System • 2 Mt. Simon Sandstone. 2 Eau Claire Formation • 6 Galesville Sandstone • 8 Ironton Sandstone. 9 Franconia Formation. 9 St. Lawrence Formation. 11 Jordan Standstone. 12 Ordovician System. 13 Prairie du Chien Group. 14 Oneota Dolomite. 14 Shakopee Formation. 15 St. Peter Sandstone. 17 Glenwood Formation. 17 Platteville Formation. 18 Decorah Shale. 19 Galena Group • 22 Cummings ville Formation. 22 Prosser Limestone. 23 Stewartville Formation • 24 Dubuque Formation. 24 Maquoketa Formation. 25 Devonian System • 25 Spillville Formation • 26 Wapsipinicon Formation 26 Cedar Valley Formation • 26 Northwestern Minnesota. 28 Winnipeg Formation • 28 Red River Formation. 29 Acknowledgments • 30 References cited. 30 Appendix--Principal gamma logs used to construct the composite gamma log illustrated on Plate 1. 36 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 • Paleozoic lithostratigraphic nomenclature for Minnesota • .in pocket Figure 1. Paleogeographic maps of southeastern Minnesota • 3 2. Map showing locations of outcrops, type sections, and cores, southeastern t1innesota • 4 3. Upper Cambrian stratigraphic nomenclature 7 iii Figure 4. Lower Ordovician stratigraphic nomenclature • • • • 14 5. Upper Ordovician stratigraphic nomenclature 20 6. Middle Devonian stratigraphic nomenclature. • • . • • 27 7. Map showing locations of cores and cuttings in northwestern Minnesota • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 29 TABLE Table 1. Representative cores in Upper Cambrian formations •••••• 5 The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, national orgin, handicap, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Dubuque North Quadrangle Iowa-Wisconsin-Illinois
    <N rH Geology of the Dubuque North Quadrangle Iowa-Wisconsin-Illinois "Si GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1123-C Prepared in cooperation with the Iowa Geological Survey and the 25 Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey W 4 sI wI w iw CQ 1 ** Geology of the Dubuque North Quadrangle lowa-Wisconsin-Illinois By JESSE W. WHITLOW and C. ERVIN BROWN GEOLOGY OF PARTS OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ZINC-LEAD DISTRICT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1123-C Prepared in cooperation with the Iowa Geological Survey and the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B, Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. * CONTENTS Page Abstract_'....................................................... 139 Introduction... __ . _ __-_._____...___ 140 General geology __-._ _____________________ _ __ 143 Precambrian rocks_______-_ .__-__.._-_ _ ____ 144 Upper Cambrian Series____- _______ _______ _______ 144 Lower Ordovician Series_ ..................................... 144 Prairie du Chien Group___ ___________________________ 144 Middle Ordovician Series..________ ______________________ 145 St. Peter Sandstone.. _ 145 Platteville Formation_____________-_________-_-_ ___. 145 Glenwood Shale Member...________________________ 145 Pecatonica Dolomite Member. _____ ________ 146 McGregor Limestone Member________ _.__ __ 146 Quimbys Mill Member.._ _______________ ____ 147 Decorah Formation____ __ ____________________ 147 Spechts Ferry Shale Member.... .. _ 148 Guttenberg Limestone Member_________________________ 149 Ion Dolomite Member..____________________. 150 ||| Galena Dolomite._______________________________ ___ 151 Cherty unit_ 151 Noncherty unit___ .............................. 152 Upper Ordovician Series____ ................................. 153 Maquoketa Shale_______.___________________ 153 Brown shaly unit..
    [Show full text]