DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Copy 2019 01 23 Gurun

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Copy 2019 01 23 Gurun This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Gurung, Sonam Title: Kainate Receptors in various forms of plasticity General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Kainate Receptors in various forms of plasticity Sonam Gurung August 2018 A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by advanced study in the School of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences. Word Count:46,182 Abstract Kainate receptors (KARs) are glutamate-gated ion channels that regulate neuronal excitability and network function in the brain. They can signal through both canonical ionotropic and a non-canonical metabotropic pathway. They regulate neuronal excitability by undergoing plasticity themselves while also regulating plasticity of other receptors. Most KARs contain the subunit GluK2 and the precise properties of these GluK2-containing KARs are determined by additional factors including ADAR2-mediated mRNA editing of a single codon that changes a genomically encoded glutamine (Q) to an arginine (R), which affects their assembly, trafficking and channel properties. I initially set out to study the role of KARs in various forms of plasticity including long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) of AMPA receptors (AMPAR) and homeostatic scaling of KARs themselves. I was unable to reliably replicate previous data showing transient KAR stimulation leads to their increased surface expression which in turn increases AMPAR surface expression. Interestingly however, I discovered that sustained KAR stimulation decreased AMPAR surface expression leading to AMPAR LTD. In addition, I identified that KARs undergo homeostatic plasticity whereby they upscale and downscale in response to changes in the network activity. My findings show that ADAR2-dependent Q/R editing of GluK2 is dynamically regulated during homeostatic plasticity elicited by the suppression of synaptic activity. This suppression of synaptic activity decreases ADAR2 levels by enhancing their proteasomal degradation, which selectively reduces the numbers of GluK2 subunits that are edited. This loss of editing results in increased KAR oligomerisation and ER exit to increase the surface expression of GluK2-containing KARs. Furthermore, I show that partial ADAR2 knockdown phenocopies and occludes TTX-induced scaling of KARs. These data indicate that activity-dependent regulation of ADAR2 levels and GluK2 Q/R editing provides a mechanism for KAR homeostatic plasticity. i Author’s Declaration I declare that the work in this dissertation was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University's Regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. Except where indicated by specific reference in the text, the work is the candidate's own work. Work done in collaboration with, or with the assistance of, others, is indicated as such. Any views expressed in the dissertation are those of the author. SIGNED: ………………………………………DATE: ………………. ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, thank you Jeremy for the ‘incredible’ supervision! You have been an amazing supervisor and thank you for believing in me more than I did. You have helped me build my confidence. I have learned a lot and enjoyed my PhD throughout. Thank you, Kev, for teaching me pretty much everything throughout my PhD. All my achievements and everything I learned was all due to your amazing supervision and patience and I am very grateful for it. Thank you, Ash, for all your help, especially my scaling project; a project I thoroughly enjoyed working with and for my new-found love for ADARs! Thank you, Suko, for everything, the lab would not have functioned without you and I have learned a lot from you. Thank you to Dan and Ruth for your advice and help throughout my PhD. To Laura, Alex, Vanilla, Jodie, Caroline and Zsombor, thank you for all the tea breaks and sharing our woes together and all the science advice! Vanilla and Luis, my dissection buddies. Those neurones would not have scaled, if it hadn’t been for the beautiful cells, we dissected every week! Alex again thank you so much for the macros that saved me so much time on analysing hundreds of nuclei! Thank you, Phil, for helping me settle in the lab when I first started as an undergrad and Chun for your supervision during my rotation months. Everybody in Henley and Hanley lab, past and present, thank you! Also thank you to my rotation supervisors: Ash Toye and Chrissy Hammond. I got an opportunity to be part of completely different and interesting projects with you both and I enjoyed being part of both of your labs. Thank you my Wellcome course mates: Rob, Lea, Mel and Amy for providing me with all the support, inspiration and fun times I will cherish very much. Finally, I want to thank my family. My sisters, Sophia and Sarina, for providing me with all the support throughout my life, not just my PhD that I always feel lucky to have and my parents for all the love, belief, support and the food! To end, I would say everything I have learned and achieved throughout my PhD was due to all the positive support I had around me, so thank you to everyone who helped me throughout my PhD! iii Table of Contents General Introduction ............................................................... 1 1.1 Synaptic transmission ....................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Synapses ................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Chemical synapses and transmission ........................................ 2 1.1.3 Excitatory and inhibitory transmission ........................................ 3 1.1.4 Measuring synaptic transmission ............................................... 4 1.2 Ionotropic glutamate receptors ......................................................... 5 1.2.1 AMPARs ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Kainate Receptors .................................................................... 10 1.3 Synaptic plasticity ........................................................................... 25 1.3.1 Hebbian plasticity ..................................................................... 25 1.3.2 Homeostatic plasticity ............................................................... 30 1.4 Adenosine to Inosine RNA editing by ADARs ................................. 42 1.4.1 Adenosine Deaminase Acting on RNA (ADAR) ....................... 42 1.4.2 ADAR structure ........................................................................ 43 1.4.3 ADAR isoforms ......................................................................... 45 1.4.4 ADAR tissue expression and cellular localisation ..................... 46 1.4.5 ADAR substrate preference and specificity .............................. 47 1.4.6 Potential co-factor involvement in the deamination .................. 48 1.4.7 ADAR3 lacks catalytic activity .................................................. 48 1.5 Q/R editing of glutamate receptor by ADARs .................................. 49 1.5.1 ADAR2 in Q/R editing of KARs and AMPARs .......................... 50 1.5.2 Effects of Q/R editing on glutamate receptor properties ........... 52 1.5.3 Q/R editing of GluA2 is important for survival ........................... 54 iv 1.5.4 Developmental and plasticity role of Q/R editing in AMPARs ... 55 1.5.5 Developmental and plasticity role of Q/R editing in KARs ........ 56 1.5.6 GluK2 Q/R editing and seizures ............................................... 57 1.6 Other forms of Glutamate receptor RNA editing ............................. 58 1.7 Glutamate receptor RNA editing in diseases .................................. 60 1.8 Objectives ....................................................................................... 61 Materials and methods .......................................................... 65 2.1 Materials ......................................................................................... 66 2.1.1 Chemicals ................................................................................ 66 2.1.2 Bacterial reagents ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Glutamate Receptors
    A guide to glutamate receptors 1 Contents Glutamate receptors . 4 Ionotropic glutamate receptors . 4 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 4 - Function ............................................................................................................ 5 - AMPA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - NMDA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - Kainate receptors ............................................................................................... 6 Metabotropic glutamate receptors . 8 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 - Function ............................................................................................................ 9 - Group I: mGlu1 and mGlu5. .9 - Group II: mGlu2 and mGlu3 ................................................................................. 10 - Group III: mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8 ............................................................ 10 Protocols and webinars . 11 - Protocols ......................................................................................................... 11 - Webinars ......................................................................................................... 12 References and further reading . 13 Excitatory synapse pathway
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between Neurons and Glia in Synapse Development And
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The interplay between neurons and glia in synapse development and plasticity Jeff A Stogsdill and Cagla Eroglu In the brain, the formation of complex neuronal networks and regulate distinct aspects of synaptic development and amenable to experience-dependent remodeling is complicated circuit connectivity. by the diversity of neurons and synapse types. The establishment of a functional brain depends not only on The intricate communication between neurons and glia neurons, but also non-neuronal glial cells. Glia are in and their cooperative roles in synapse formation are now continuous bi-directional communication with neurons to direct coming to light due in large part to advances in genetic the formation and refinement of synaptic connectivity. This and imaging tools. This article will examine the progress article reviews important findings, which uncovered cellular made in our understanding of the role of mammalian and molecular aspects of the neuron–glia cross-talk that perisynaptic glia (astrocytes and microglia) in synapse govern the formation and remodeling of synapses and circuits. development, maturation, and plasticity since the previ- In vivo evidence demonstrating the critical interplay between ous Current Opinion article [1]. An integration of past and neurons and glia will be the major focus. Additional attention new findings of glial control of synapse development and will be given to how aberrant communication between neurons plasticity is tabulated in Box 1. and glia may contribute to neural pathologies. Address Glia control the formation of synaptic circuits Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, In the CNS, glial cells are in tight association with NC 27710, USA synapses in all brain regions [2].
    [Show full text]
  • PRESYNAPTIC Α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS of GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/826016; this version posted October 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. PRESYNAPTIC α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS OF GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L. Schöpf1, Stefanie Geisler1, Ruslan I. Stanika1, Marta Campiglio1, Walter A. Kaufmann3, Benedikt Nimmervoll1, Bettina Schlick1, Ryuichi Shigemoto3, and Gerald J. Obermair1,2* From Division of Physiology, Medical University Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck1, Division Physiology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3500 Krems2, and Institute of Science and Technology Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg3, Austria. Running head: Presynaptic α2δ subunits organize synapses Address correspondence to: *Gerald J. Obermair, Univ.-Prof. Dr., Phone: +43-2732-72090490, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] In nerve cells the genes encoding for α2δ the auxiliary β and α2δ subunits. α2δ subunits, the subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels targets of the widely prescribed anti-epileptic and (VGCCs) have been linked to synaptic functions anti-allodynic drugs gabapentin and pregabalin, are and neurological disease. Here we show that α2δ membrane-anchored extracellular glycoproteins, subunits are essential for the formation and which modulate VGCC trafficking and calcium organization of glutamatergic synapses. Using a currents (Arikkath and Campbell, 2003; Dolphin, cellular α2δ subunit triple loss-of-function model, 2013; Geisler et al., 2015; Obermair et al., 2008; we demonstrate a failure in presynaptic Zamponi et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Control and Neuromodulationof Lower Urinary
    Neural Control and Neuromodulation of Lower Urinary Tract Function William C. de Groat University of Pittsburgh Topics • Anatomy and functions of the lower urinary tract • Peripheral innervation (efferent and afferent nerves) • Central neural control of the lower urinary tract • Lower urinary tract dysfunction • Treatment of dysfunction (neuromodulation) • Research opportunities Anatomy and Functions of the Lower Urinary Tract Functions Two Types of Voiding 1. Urine storage - Reservoir: Bladder INVOLUNTARY (Reflex) (infant & fetus) Defect in 2. Urine release Maturation Maturation - Outlet: Urethra INVOLUNTARY THERAPY VOLUNTARY (Reflex) (adult) (adult) Bladder Parkinson’s, MS, stroke, brain tumors, spinal cord injury, Urethra aging, cystitis Lower Urinary Tract Innervation Two Types of Visceral Afferent Neurons: Bladder & Bowel Aδ-fibers responsible for normal bladder sensations C-fibers contribute to urgency, frequency and incontinence Afferent Sensitivity may be Influenced by Substances Released from the Urothelium Aδ fiber C fiber X CNS Urothelium The Bladder U rothelium Glycosaminoglycan Layer Uroplakin Plaques and Discoidal Vesicles r=_zo_"_"l_a_o_cc-lu---.dens } Umbrella Cell Stratum Intermediate Cell Stratum } Basal Cell Stratum Afferent Nerve fiber Urothelial-Afferent Interactions ( I ( I ( I ( ' ( I ( I ( I Urothelium ( I ( 0 I I I AChR ATP, NO, NKA, ACh, NGF ~erves ' Efferent ' nerves nerves Interaction of Sensory Pathways of Multiple Pelvic Organs Convergent Dichotomizing Branch Bladder point Colon Somatic and Visceral Afferent
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Synapses and Their Functional Interactions with Chemical Synapses
    REVIEWS Electrical synapses and their functional interactions with chemical synapses Alberto E. Pereda Abstract | Brain function relies on the ability of neurons to communicate with each other. Interneuronal communication primarily takes place at synapses, where information from one neuron is rapidly conveyed to a second neuron. There are two main modalities of synaptic transmission: chemical and electrical. Far from functioning independently and serving unrelated functions, mounting evidence indicates that these two modalities of synaptic transmission closely interact, both during development and in the adult brain. Rather than conceiving synaptic transmission as either chemical or electrical, this article emphasizes the notion that synaptic transmission is both chemical and electrical, and that interactions between these two forms of interneuronal communication might be required for normal brain development and function. Communication between neurons is required for Electrical and chemical synapses are now known to brain function, and the quality of such communica- coexist in most organisms and brain structures, but details tion enables hardwired neural networks to act in a of the properties and distribution of these two modalities of dynamic fashion. Functional interactions between transmission are still emerging. Most research efforts neurons occur at anatomically identifiable cellular have focused on exploring the mechanisms of chemi- regions called synapses. Although the nature of synaptic cal transmission, and considerably less is known transmission has been an area of enormous controversy about those underlying electrical transmission. It was (BOX 1), two main modalities of synaptic transmission — thought that electrical synapses were more abundant namely, chemical and electrical — are now recognized. At in invertebrates and cold-blooded vertebrates than chemical synapses, information is transferred through in mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 2000, 20(1):59–65 Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission Shinichi Iwasaki,1 Akiko Momiyama,2 Osvaldo D. Uchitel,3 and Tomoyuki Takahashi1 1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, 2Laboratory of Cerebral Structure, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan, and 3Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Laboratorio de Fisiologia y Biologia, Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina Multiple types of high-voltage-activated Ca 21 channels trigger fact, Ca 21 currents directly recorded from the auditory calyceal neurotransmitter release at the mammalian central synapse. presynaptic terminal were identified as N-, P/Q-, and R-types at Among them, the v-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive N-type channels postnatal day 7 (P7) to P10 but became predominantly P/Q- and the v-Aga-IVA-sensitive P/Q-type channels mediate fast type at P13. In contrast to thalamic and cerebellar IPSCs and synaptic transmission. However, at most central synapses, it is brainstem auditory EPSCs, N-type Ca 21 channels persistently not known whether the contributions of different Ca 21 channel contribute to cerebral cortical EPSCs and spinal IPSCs types to synaptic transmission remain stable throughout post- throughout postnatal months. Thus, in adult animals, synaptic natal development. We have addressed this question by testing transmission is predominantly mediated by P/Q-type channels type-specific Ca 21 channel blockers at developing central syn- at a subset of synapses and mediated synergistically by multi- apses.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2001, 21(16):5935–5943 GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse Scott Gutovitz, John T. Birmingham, Jason A. Luther, David J. Simon, and Eve Marder Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110 GABA mediates both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition at ␤-(Aminomethyl)-4-chlorobenzenepropanoic acid (baclofen) many synapses. In contrast, we show that GABA enhances was an effective agonist for the GABA-evoked enhancement transmission at excitatory synapses between the lateral gastric but did not increase the postjunctional conductance. Muscimol and medial gastric motor neurons and the gastric mill 6a and 9 activated a rapid postsynaptic conductance but did not en- (gm6a, gm9) muscles and between the lateral pyloric motor hance the amplitude of the nerve-evoked EJPs. GABA had no neuron and pyloric 1 (p1) muscles in the stomach of the lobster effect on iontophoretic responses to glutamate and decreased Homarus americanus. Two-electrode current-clamp or voltage- the coefficient of variation of nerve-evoked EJPs. In the pres- clamp techniques were used to record from muscle fibers. The ence or absence of tetrodotoxin, GABA increased the fre- innervating nerves were stimulated to evoke excitatory junc- quency but not the amplitude of miniature endplate potentials. tional potentials (EJPs) or excitatory junctional currents. Bath These data suggest that GABA acts presynaptically via a application of GABA first decreased the amplitude of evoked GABAB-like receptor to increase the release of EJPs in gm6a and gm9 muscles, but not the p1 muscle, by neurotransmitter. activating a postjunctional conductance increase that was blocked by picrotoxin.
    [Show full text]
  • Presynaptic Establishment of the Synaptic Cleft Extracellular Matrix Is Required for Post-Synaptic Differentiation
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Presynaptic establishment of the synaptic cleft extracellular matrix is required for post-synaptic differentiation Jeffrey Rohrbough, Emma Rushton, Elvin Woodruff III, Tim Fergestad, Krishanthan Vigneswaran, and Kendal Broadie1 Department of Biological Sciences, Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA Formation and regulation of excitatory glutamatergic synapses is essential for shaping neural circuits throughout development. In a Drosophila genetic screen for synaptogenesis mutants, we identified mind the gap (mtg), which encodes a secreted, extracellular N-glycosaminoglycan-binding protein. MTG is expressed neuronally and detected in the synaptic cleft, and is required to form the specialized transsynaptic matrix that links the presynaptic active zone with the post-synaptic glutamate receptor (GluR) domain. Null mtg embryonic mutant synapses exhibit greatly reduced GluR function, and a corresponding loss of localized GluR domains. All known post-synaptic signaling/scaffold proteins functioning upstream of GluR localization are also grossly reduced or mislocalized in mtg mutants, including the dPix–dPak–Dock cascade and the Dlg/PSD-95 scaffold. Ubiquitous or neuronally targeted mtg RNA interference (RNAi) similarly reduce post-synaptic assembly, whereas post-synaptically targeted RNAi has no effect, indicating that presynaptic MTG induces and maintains the post-synaptic pathways driving GluR domain formation. These findings suggest that MTG is secreted from the presynaptic terminal to shape the extracellular synaptic cleft domain, and that the cleft domain functions to mediate transsynaptic signals required for post-synaptic development. [Keywords: Glutamatergic synaptogenesis; post-synaptic density; glutamate receptor; secretion; Drosophila; neuromuscular junction] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
    [Show full text]
  • WWP2 Promotes Degradation of Transcription Factor OCT4 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
    Cell Research (2009) 19:561-573. © 2009 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/09 $ 30.00 npg ORIGINAL ARTICLE www.nature.com/cr WWP2 promotes degradation of transcription factor OCT4 in human embryonic stem cells Huiming Xu1, 2, Weicheng Wang1, 2, Chunliang Li2, Hongyao Yu2, Acong Yang1, 2, Beibei Wang2, Ying Jin1, 2, 3 1Shanghai Stem Cell Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 225 South Chongqing Road, Shanghai 200025, China; 2Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200031, China; 3Key Laboratory of Cell Differ- entiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China POU transcription factor OCT4 not only plays an essential role in maintaining the pluripotent and self-renewing state of embryonic stem (ES) cells but also acts as a cell fate determinant through a gene dosage effect. However, the molecular mechanisms that control the intracellular OCT4 protein level remain elusive. Here, we report that human WWP2, an E3 ubiquitin (Ub)-protein ligase, interacts with OCT4 specifically through its WW domain and enhances Ub modification of OCT4 both in vitro and in vivo. We first demonstrated that endogenous OCT4 in hu- man ES cells can be post-translationally modified by Ub. Furthermore, we found that WWP2 promoted degradation of OCT4 through the 26S proteasome in a dosage-dependent manner, and the active site cysteine residue of WWP2 was required for both its enzymatic activity and proteolytic effect on OCT4.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrk2 Controls Excitatory Synapse Development Via PDZ-Mediated
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Slitrk2 controls excitatory synapse development via PDZ-mediated protein interactions Kyung Ah Han 1,2, Jinhu Kim1,2, Hyeonho Kim1,2, Dongwook Kim1, Dongseok Lim1, Jaewon Ko 1 & Ji Won Um 1* Members of the Slitrk (Slit- and Trk-like protein) family of synaptic cell-adhesion molecules control excitatory and inhibitory synapse development through isoform-dependent extracellular interactions with leukocyte common antigen-related receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (LAR-RPTPs). However, how Slitrks participate in activation of intracellular signaling pathways in postsynaptic neurons remains largely unknown. Here we report that, among the six members of the Slitrk family, only Slitrk2 directly interacts with the PDZ domain-containing excitatory scafolds, PSD-95 and Shank3. The interaction of Slitrk2 with PDZ proteins is mediated by the cytoplasmic COOH-terminal PDZ domain-binding motif (Ile-Ser-Glu-Leu), which is not found in other Slitrks. Mapping analyses further revealed that a single PDZ domain of Shank3 is responsible for binding to Slitrk2. Slitrk2 forms in vivo complexes with membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family proteins in addition to PSD-95 and Shank3. Intriguingly, in addition to its role in synaptic targeting in cultured hippocampal neurons, the PDZ domain-binding motif of Slitrk2 is required for Slitrk2 promotion of excitatory synapse formation, transmission, and spine development in the CA1 hippocampal region. Collectively, our data suggest a new molecular mechanism for conferring isoform-specifc regulatory actions of the Slitrk family in orchestrating intracellular signal transduction pathways in postsynaptic neurons. Synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that permit transmission of signals from presynaptic to postsyn- aptic neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Glial Contribution to Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Loss in Neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara
    University of Dundee Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara Published in: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 Publication date: 2019 Licence: CC BY Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Henstridge, C., Tzioras, M., & Paolicelli, R. C. (2019). Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 13, [63]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 REVIEW published: 26 February 2019 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063
    [Show full text]