No C 283/52 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING OF THURSDAY, 9 OCTOBER 1986 (86/C 283/04)

PART I

Proceedings of the sitting

IN THE CHAIR: MR PLIMLIN

President

(The sitting was opened at 10 a.m.)

Mr d'Ormesson protested against the refusal of the Mr Boutos, on behalf of the ERDA Group, on a propo­ Socialist and Communist Groups to allow Mrs Lehi- sal for a Council decision on special Community aid deux to be a co-signatory, on behalf of the ER Group, for the reconstruction of the areas damaged by earth­ of the compromise amendment tabled on drug abuse in quakes in Greece in September 1986 (Doc. B 2-903/ the Community. 86);

1. Approval of minutes — amendment by Mrs Pantazi, on behalf of the Socialist Group, Mr Christodoulou, on behalf of the Mr Cryer referred to the personal statement by EPP Group, Mr Ephremidis and Mr Filinis, on behalf Mr McMahon (part I, end of item 9 of the previous day's of the Communist Group and Mr Boutos, on behalf of minutes) and complained that the minutes were not the ERDA Group, seeking to replace these four more explicit; he asked that the enlarged Bureau motions for resolutions with a new text: adopted. should look into the matter. Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. item 1 (b)).

TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE — motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Ephremidis and Mr Filinis, on behalf of the Communist Group, on the recent devastation caused by storms and floods in 2. Natural disasters (vote) Crete (Doc. B 2-932/86): The next item was the vote on nine motions for resolu­ tions. Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item 1 (c)). (As the Commission had sent a communication to members on special Community aid to the disaster- — motion for a resolution tabled by Mrs Garcia Arias stricken areas in Greece, its representative chose not to and others, on behalf of the Socialist Group, on the speak.) serious losses sustained by cattle breeders and farmers — motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Langes and in certain regions of Spain (Doc. B 2-927/86): others, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the disastrous whirlwind in the Bitburg/Prum region (Federal Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item Republic of Germany) (Doc. B 2-900/86): 1 (d))- Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item — motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Lataillade 1(a)) and others, on behalf of the ERDA Group, and — motions for resolutions tabled by: Mrs Pery, on the disastrous floods in the Bordeaux Mr Christodoulou and others, on the earthquakes region (Doc. B 2-935/86): which devastated the south-west Peloponnese and the town of Kalamata in particular, from 13 to 15 Septem­ Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item ber 1986 (Doc. B 2-901/86), 1(e)). Mrs Pantazi and others, on behalf of the Socialist — motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Pitt and Group, on the earthquake in Kalamata (Doc. B 2-926/ others, on the effects of Typhoon Wayne (Doc. B 2- 86/rev.), 944/86): Mr Ephremidis and Mr Filinis, on behalf of the Com­ munist Group, on the earthquake in the region of Kala­ Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item mata (Doc. B 2-931/86), 1 (/))• 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/53 Thursday, 9 October 1986

3. International summits (debate and vote) Against: 0. Abstentions: 3. The next item was the joint debate on four motions for resolutions. (the other amendments fell) Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, Mr Poettering introduced the motion for a resolution item 2 (a)). which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the EPP Group, on the CCBMDE closing document from Stockholm, the forthcoming summit meeting in Reykja­ vik and the CSCE follow-up conference in Vienna — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-915/86): (Doc. B 2-913/86). Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution. Mr Pordea introduced the motion for a resolution which he, Mr Romualdi and Mr Dimitriadis had tabled, on behalf of the ER Group, on the forthcoming — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-938/86): meeting in Reykjavik between Mr Gorbachov and Mr Reagan (Doc. B 2-915/86). A request had been made by the EPP and ED Groups for a split vote on paragraph 5:

Mr Cervetti introduced the motion for a resolution Recitals and paragraphs 1 to 4: adopted. which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Com­ munist Group, on the Reykjavik Summit (Doc. B 2- Paragraph 5: introductory phrase and subparagraph 1: 938/86). adopted.

Mrs Scrivener introduced the motion for a resolution Subparagraphs 2 to 6: adopted by electronic vote. which she and Mrs Veil had tabled, on behalf of the Liberal Group, on the absence of Europe from summit Paragraphs 6 to 8: adopted by electronic vote. meetings (Doe. B 2-942/86). Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item

The following spoke: Mr Hansen, on behalf of the 2(b)). Socialist Group, Mr Penders, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Prag, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bail- — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-942/86): lot, on behalf of the Communist Group, Mr Medeiros Ferreira, on behalf of the ERDA Group, Mr Ulburghs, Recitals and paragraph 1: adopted. non-attached member, Mr Habsburg and Mr Miranda da Silva. Paragraph 2: — amendment 1 by Mrs Veil, on behalf of the Liberal The President declared the joint debate closed. Group: adopted. The Socialist Group requested a separate vote on para­ graphs 3 to 5: Paragraphs 3 to 5: rejected. VOTE: Paragraph 6: adopted.

Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-913/86): 2(c)).

— amendment 1 by Mr Poettering, Mr Habsburg and Mr Penders, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Hansch, 4. Human rights (debate and vote) on behalf of the Socialist Group, Sir Henry Plumb and Mr Prag, on behalf of the ED Group: adopted by RCV The next item was the joint debate on nine motions for (EPP): resolutions. MrToksvig introduced the motion for a resolution Members voting: 123 ('). tabled by Lord Bethell, himself and others, on behalf of the ED Group> on hostages in the Lebanon (Doc. B 2- For: 120. 918/86)J

Mr Beumer introduced the motion for a resolution (') See Annex. which he had tabled, on behalf of the EPP Group, on No C 283/54 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

the death sentences carried out recently in Indonesia — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-912/86): (Doc. B 2-912/86). Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item Mrs van den Heuvel introduced the motion for a reso­ 3(b)). lution which she and Mr Woltjer had tabled, on behalf of the Socialist Group, on the execution of three politi­ cal prisoners in Indonesia (Doc. B 2-925/86). — Motions for resolutions (Docs B 2-925, B 2-937 and B 2-939/86):

— amendment 1 by Mr Verbeek, on behalf of the IN THE CHAIR: MRS CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI Rainbow Group, Mr Wurtz, on behalf of the Commun­ ist Group and Mrs van den Heuvel, on behalf of the Socialist Group, seeking to replace these three motions Vice-President for resolutions with a new text: adopted by RCV (SOC and COM): Mr Verbeek introduced the motion for a resolution which he and Mr Schwalba-Hoth had tabled, on behalf Members voting: 124 (•). of the Rainbow Group, on the execution of political prisoners in Indonesia (Doc. B 2-937/86). For: 85. Against: 39. Mr Wurtz introduced the motion for a resolution which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Communist Abstentions: 0. Group, on the execution of political and trade union leaders in Indonesia (Doc. B 2-939/86). Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, item 3 (c)). Mr Barros Moura introduced the motion for a resolu­ tion which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Communist Group, on the situation in Chile (Doc. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-921/86): B 2-921/86). Parliament adopted the resolution by electronic vote Mr Verbeek introduced the motion for a resolution (see part II, item 3 (d)). which Mr Staes had tabled, on behalf of the Rainbow Group, on the increase in human rights violations in Guatemala (Doc. B 2-922/86). — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-922/86):

Mr Arbeloa Muru introduced the motion for a resolu­ Recital A: tion which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Socialist Group, on human rights in certain countries in — amendment 2 (2) : adopted. Central and South America (Doc. B 2-924/86). Recital A: adopted as amended. Mrs Oppenheim introduced the motion for a resolution Recital B: which she and others had tabled, on behalf of the ED Group, on an initiative concerning negotiations within — amendments 3 and 4: adopted by successive votes. the Council on the drawing up of a common European policy on refugees (Doc. B 2-920/86/rev.). Recital B: adopted as amended.

The following spoke: Mr Boesmans, on behalf of the Recital C: Socialist Group, Mrs Lenz, on behalf of the EPP — amendment 5: adopted by electronic vote. Group, Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the ED Group, Mrs Nielsen, on behalf of the Liberal Group, Mr Mich- Recital C: adopted as amended. elini, and Mr Mosar, Member of the Commission. After recital C: The President declared the joint debate closed. — amendment 1 by Mr Boesmans: rejected. Recital E: VOTE: — amendment 6: adopted. Recital E: adopted as amended. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-918/86): (') See Annex. Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item (2) Except where otherwise indicated, all the amendments 3(a)). were tabled by Mr Glinne. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/55 Thursday, 9 October 1986

Recitals F to H: adopted. Recital C: adopted.

Recital I: Recital D and paragraph 1: adopted. — amendment 7: adopted. Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item Recital I: adopted as amended. 3(f)). Recital J:

— amendment 8: adopted. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-920/86/rev.): Recital J: adopted as amended. Recitals A and B: adopted. After recital J: After recital B: — amendments 9 and 10: adopted by successive votes. — amendment 1 by Mr Croux, on behalf of the EPP Group: adopted. Paragraph 1: Recitals C to E and paragraphs 1 to 4: adopted. — amendment 11: adopted. Paragraph 1: adopted as amended. After paragraph 4: Paragraph 2: adopted. — amendment 2 by Mr Michelin: adopted.

Paragraph 3: Paragraph 5: adopted. — amendment 12: adopted. Parliament adopted "the resolution (see part II, item Paragraph 4: 3 (g))-

— amendment 13: adopted. Mr Prag spoke on a technical point.

Paragraph 5:

— amendment 14: adopted. 5. Border controls (debate and vote) Paragraph 5: adopted as amended. The next item was the joint debate on three motions for Paragraph 6: resolutions.

— amendments 15 to 17: adopted by successive Mr von Wogau introduced the motion for a resolution votes. which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the EPP Paragraph 6: adopted as amended. Group, on the use of border controls to combat terror­ ism (Doc. B 2-907/86). Paragraph 7: Mr Mallet introduced the motion for a resolution ^ — amendments 18 and 19: adopted by successive which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the EPP votes. Group, on the wave of terrorist attacks in Paris (Doc. B 2-911/86). Paragraph 7: adopted as amended.

Mr Prout spoke on the conduct of the vote. Mr Christiansen introduced the motion for a resolution which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Paragraph 8: adopted. Socialist Group, on the introduction of a visa require­ ment in France (Doc. B 2-930/86). Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item 3(e)). The following spoke: Mr Romeos, on behalf of the Socialist Group, Mr McMillan-Scott, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Barzanti, on behalf of the Communist — Mot ion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-924/86): and Allies Group, Mr Wolff, on behalf of the Liberal Group, Mr Coste-Floret, on behalf of the ERDA A separate vote was requested by the: EPP Group on Group, Mr Gaucher, on behalf of the ER Group, recital C: Mr Schwalba-Hoth, Rainbow Group, Mr Rogalla, Mr Pannella, non-attached member, and Mr Mosar, Recitals A and B: adopted. Member of the Commission. No C 283/56 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

IN THE CHAIR: MRS PERY Paragraphs 5 and 6: adopted.

Vice-President Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item 4(b)). Mr McMillan-Scott addressed a question to the Com­ mission, to which Mr Mosar replied. The President declared the joint debate closed. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-930/86):

VOTE: Roll-call vote requested by the EPP Group:

2 — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-907/86): Members voting: 135 ( ). Recitals A to C: adopted. For: 64.

Paragraph 1 (') : adopted. Against: 63. Paragraph 1: adopted as amended. Abstentions: 8. Paragraph 2: — amendment 2: adopted. Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, item 4 (c)). Paragraph 2: adopted as amended. Paragraph 3: adopted.

Paragraph 4: 6. Nuclear safety (debate and vote) — amendments 3 and 4: adopted by successive votes. The next item was the joint debate on three motions for (Amendment 5: withdrawn.) resolutions. Paragraph 4: adopted as amended. Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti introduced the motion for Paragraph 5: adopted. a resolution which she and others had tabled, on behalf Paragraph 6: of the EPP Group, on a European conference on nuclear safety (Doc. B 2-914/86). — amendment 6: adopted. Paragraph 6: adopted as amended. Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz introduced the motion for a resolution which she had tabled, on behalf of the Rain­ Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item bow Group, on the outcome of the IAEA special con­ 4(a)). ference on nuclear safety in Vienna (Doc. B 2-916/86).

— Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-911/86): Mr Coste-Floret introduced the motion for a resolution which he and others had tabled, on behalf of the Recitals and paragraph 1: adopted. ERDA Group, on the next CSCE meeting (Doc. B 2- 936/86). Paragraph 2: — amendment 1 by Mr Gaucher, on behalf of the ER The following spoke: Mrs Viehoff, on behalf of the Group: rejected. Socialist Group, and Mr Pannella. Paragraph 2: adopted. Paragraph 3: adopted. IN THE CHAIR: MRS CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI Paragraph 4: — amendments by the same: rejected by electronic Vice-President vote. Paragraph 4: adopted. Mr Mosar, Member of the Commission, spoke.

(>) All the amendments were tabled by Mr Rogalia, on behalf of the Socialist Group. (2) See Annex. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/57 Thursday, 9 October 1986

The President declared the joint debate closed. 8. Commission statement on the IMF

Mr Matutes, Member of the Commission, made a state­ VOTE: ment on the annual meeting of the International Mone­ tary Fund. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-914/86): The following asked questions, pursuant to Rule 40 (2): Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item Mrs Van Hemeldonck, on behalf of the Socialist 5(a)). Group, Mr Christodoulou, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Alvarez de Eulate, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bonaccini, Communist Group, Mr Four- — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-916/86): cans, on behalf of the Liberal Group, Mr Pegado Liz, on behalf of the ERDA Group, Mr Cohen, Mr Romera Roll-call vote requested by the Rainbow Group: y Alcazar, Mr P. Beazley and Mr Kilby. Members voting: 128 (')• Mr Matutes answered the questions. For: 44.

Against: 83. Mr P. Beazley and Mr Matutes spoke again. Abstentions: 1.

Parliament thus rejected the resolution.

— Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-936/86): 9. Position of Parliament in the context of actions for annulment brought before the Court of Justice Parliament adopted the resolution by electronic vote (debate) (see part II, item 5 (b)). Mrs Vayssade introduced her report, drawn up on 7. Famine behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizen's Rights, on the position of the European Parliament in The next item was the joint debate on five motions for the context of actions for annulment brought before the resolutions. Court of Justice under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. A2-71/86/rev.). In view of the time, the President proposed that mem­ bers on the list of speakers should waive their right to speak, in order to allow time for the vote on these The following spoke: Mr Rothley, on behalf of the motions for resolutions. Socialist Group, MrTzounis, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Prbut, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Arndt, on behalf of the Socialist Group, objected to Mr Pegado Liz, on behalf of the ERDA Group, Mr Por- this procedure being applied to motion for resolution dea, on behalf of the ER Group, Mr Hoon, and (Doc. B 2-904/86). Mr Ripa di Meana, Member of the Commission.

In these circumstances, the President decided to close The President declared the debate closed. the topical and urgent debate.

He announced that the vote would be taken at the next voting time (see part I, item 14 of these minutes). THE TOPICAL AND URGENT DEBATE WAS CLOSED

(The sitting was suspended at 1 p.m. and resumed at 3.05 p.m.) 10. Cooperation between the institutions in the exami­ nation of petitions (debate)

IN THE CHAIR: MR MEDINA ORTEGA Mrs Dury, deputizing for the rapporteur, introduced the report drawn up by Mr Amadei, on behalf of the Com­ Vice-President mittee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions, on ini­ tiatives to strengthen cooperation between the institu­ tions in the examination of petitions submitted to the (') See Annex. European Parliament (Doc. A 2-74/86). No C 283/58 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

Mrs Vayssade spoke on behalf of the Socialist Group. Socialist Group, Mr P. Beazley, Mr Pannella, who raised a point of order and then gave an explanation of vote, Mr Roelants du Vivier, Mrs Crawley, Mr Pearce, IN THE CHAIR: MR LUCAS PIRES Mrs Squarcialupi, on behalf of the Communist Group, Mr Ford, Sir Jack Stewart-Clark, both as rapporteur and on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Pegado Liz, Vice-President Ms Tongue and Mr Beyer de Ryke. The following spoke: MrChanterie, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mrs Oppenheim, on behalf of the ED — Vote on the compromise amendment tabled by six Group, Mr Pegado Liz, on behalf of the ERDA Group, political groups, seeking to replace motions for a reso­ Mrs Boot, Mr Lafuente, Mr Prout and Mr Ripa di lution (Docs B 2-875, 884 and 887/86) by a new text Meana, Member of the Commission. (see part I, item 11 of the minutes of 8 October 1986):

The President declared the debate closed. A split vote had been requested:

He announced that the vote would take place at the (a) on the Parliament resolution: adopted by RCV next voting time (see part I, item 15 of these minutes). (EPP):

Members voting: 270 ('). 11. Directive imposing a standstill on VAT and excise duties (debate) For: 261:

Mrs Oppenheim introduced her report, drawn up on Against: 3. behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the proposal from the Abstentions: 6. Commission of the European Communities to the Council (Doc. C 2-137/85 — COM(85) 606 final) for a (b) on the draft Council resolution (the Rainbow Directive imposing a standstill on value added tax and Group had requested a separate vote on paragraph 2): excise duties (Doc. A 2-90/86). Preamble and paragraph 1: adopted. The following spoke: MrVisser, on behalf of the Socialist Group, Mr Herman, on behalf of the EPP Paragraph 2: adopted. Group, Mr Patterson, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Bonaccini, Communist Group, Mr Maher, on Paragraphs 3 to 16: adopted. behalf of the Liberal Group, Mr Christensen, Rainbow Group, Mr Bueno Vicente, Mr Muhlen, Mrs Jepsen, Mr Parliament thus adopted the abovementioned texts (see Brito Apolonia, Mr Christiansen, Mrs Boserup and Mr part II, item 6). Ripa di Meana, Member of the Commission.

Following Mr Christiansen's statement, Mr Patterson drew attention to Rule 100 (1). — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-886/86):

Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution. IN THE CHAIR: MR PFLIMLIN

President 13. Immigration policy (vote) The President declared the debate closed. The next item was the vote on four motions for resolu­ He announced that the vote would take place at the tions. next voting time (see part I, item 16 of these minutes).

12. Drug abuse in the Community (vote) — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-881/86):

The next item was the vote on four motions for resolu­ Preamble and recitals A to E: adopted. tions: After recital E:

Explanations of vote: — amendment 1 by Mr Pearce: rejected. The following spoke: Mrs Heinrich, on behalf of the Rainbow Group, Mrs d'Ancona, on behalf of the (') See Annex. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/59 Thursday, 9 October 1986

Paragraph 1: a split vote had been requested by the Members voting: 250 (l). • Liberal Group: For: 211. Point (a): adopted. Against: 37. Point (b): adopted. Points (c) and (d): adopted. Abstentions: 2. Paragraphs 2 to 4: adopted. Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, item 7'.(c)):

Explanations of vote:

Mr Pearce, Mrs Dury and Mr Ford spoke. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-885/86):

A roll-call vote had been requested by the EPP Group Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution. on the motion for a resolution as a whole: Members voting: 246 ('). 14. Position of Parliament in the context of actions for For: 237. annulment brought before the Court of Justice (vote) Against: 6. Abstentions: 3. The next item was the vote on the motion for a resolu­ tion contained in the Vayssade report (Doc. A 2-71/ Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, 86/rev.) (2). item 7(a)). Preamble, recitals and paragraphs 1 to 3: adopted.

— Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-882/86) : Paragraph 4:

Preamble and paragraphs 1 and 2: adopted. — amendment 2 by Mr De Gucht, on behalf of the Liberal Group: rejected; Paragraph 3: — amendment 1 by Mr Ford: adopted. — amendment 1 by Mr Pordea: rejected. Paragraph 3: adopted as amended. Paragraph 4: adopted.

Paragraphs 4 to 6: adopted. Paragraph 5: adopted.

Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item A roll-call vote had been requested by the EPP Group 7 (b)). on the motion for a resolution as a whole: Mr Bombard spoke on the conduct of the votes. Members voting: 242X1).

For: 241. — Motion for a resolution (Doc. B 2-883/86): Against:!. The EPP Group had requested a separate vote on para­ graph 7: Abstentions: 0.

Preamble and paragraphs 1 to 6: adopted. Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, item 8): Paragraph 7; First part up to 'migrant workers': adopted. Remainder: adopted by electronic vote. 15. Cooperation between the institutions in the exami­ nation of petitions (vote) Paragraph 8: adopted. The next item was the vote on the motion for a resolu­ A roll-call vote had been requested by the EPP and ED tion contained in the Amadei report (Doc. A 2-74/86). Groups on the motion for a resolution as a whole:

(2) The rapporteur had communicated his opinion on (') See Annex. amendments to the President in writing. No C 283/60 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

Preamble and recitals: adopted. Mr Patterson spoke on the conduct of the vote.

Paragraph 1: — amendment 16/rev. by Mr De Gucht: rejected.

— amendment 1 by Mr Chanterie: adopted after Mrs Article 1, paragraph 4: Dury, deputizing for the rapporteur, had spoken. — amendment 3 by the Committee on Economic Paragraph 1: adopted as amended. Affairs: adopted. Paragraphs 2 to 4: adopted. Article 2, paragraph 3:

— amendment6 by MrVisser: rejected by electronic Explanations of vote: vote.

Mrs Dury spoke. Article 3:

Parliament adopted the resolution (see part II, item 9). — amendment 7 by the same: rejected.

Parliament approved the Commission proposal as 16. Directive imposing a standstill on VAT and excise amended by electronic vote (see part II, item 10). duties (vote)

The next item was the vote on the Oppenheim report — Motion for a resolution : (Doc. A 2-90/86) ('). Preamble, recitals and paragraphs 1 to 3: adopted.

— Proposal for a Directive (COM(85) 606 final — Doc. Paragraph 4: C 2-137/85): — amendment 17 by Mr De Gucht: rejected. Article 1, paragraph 2: Paragraph 4: adopted. — amendment 1 by the Committee on Economic Affairs: adopted. Paragraph 5: Article 1, paragraph 3: — amendment 18 by the same: rejected; — amendment 2 by the same: a split vote had been requested by Mr De Gucht and the Socialist Group: — amendment 8 by Mr Visser: rejected.

Introductory phrase: adopted by electronic vote. Paragraph 5: adopted. Paragraph 6:

IN THE CHAIR: MRS PERY — amendment 19 by Mr De Gucht: rejected;

— amendment9 by MrVisser: rejected by electronic Vice-President vote.

Point (a): rejected by electronic vote. Paragraph 6: adopted. Point (b): rejected. Paragraphs 7 and 8: adopted. Points (c) and (d) (of the Commission text): adopted. Paragraph 9: The rapporteur spoke. — amendment 20 by Mr De Gucht: rejected. — amendment 4: fell; Paragraph 9: adopted. amendment5 by MrVisser: rejected by electronic vote. Paragraphs 10 to 12: adopted.

(') The rapporteur had communicated his opinion on the Mr Herman asked the Commission to state its position amendments other than those tabled by the Committee on the amendments adopted by Parliament to the pro­ on Economic Affairs to the President in writing. posal. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/61 Thursday, ^October 1986

Mr Ripa di Meana, Member of the Commission, spoke. The following spoke: Mr Rossetti, Draftsman of the opi­ nion of the Committee on External Economic Relations, Mrs Seibel-Emmerling, on behalf of the Socialist Explanations of vote: Group and as the chairman of the Delegation for Rela­ tions with Yugoslavia, Mrs Braun-Moser, on behalf of The following spoke: Mrs Oppenheim, Mr Cryer, Mr the EPP Group, Mr Romero y Alcazar, on behalf of the Patterson, on behalf of the ED Group, and Mrs Craw­ ED Group, Mr Wijsenbeek, on behalf of the Liberal ley, the latter on the representation of the Commission. Group, Mr Staes, Rainbow Group, Mr Cornelissen, A roll-call vote had been requested by the EPP and Mr Anastassopoulos, Chairman of the Committee on Transport, and Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Com­ Rainbow Groups on the motion for a resolution as a mission. whole: Members voting: 217 (*). The President declared that the debate was closed. For: 120. He announced that the vote on the motion for a resolu­ Against: 92. tion would take place the following morning (see part I, Abstentions: 5. item 5 of the minutes of 10 October 1986). Parliament thus adopted the resolution (see part II, item 10). 19. Directive on the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (debate) 17. EEC marine research institute (debate) Mrs Lienemann introduced her report, drawn up on Mr Vittinghoff introduced his report, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Energy, Research and behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Technology, on the establishment of an EEC marine Health and Consumer Protection, on the proposal from research institute (Doc. A 2-93/86). the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (COM(85) 377 final — Doc. C 2-73/85) for a The following spoke: Mr Duarte Cendan, on behalf of Directive amending Directive 75/716/EEC on the the Socialist Group, Mr Mallet, on behalf of the EPP approximation of the laws of the Member States relat­ Group, Mr Robles Piquer, on behalf of the ED Group, ing to the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels (Doc. Mr Ippolito, on behalf of the Communist and Allies A 2-99/86). Group, Mr Barrett, on behalf of the ERDA Group, Mr Roelants du Vivier, Rainbow Group, Mr Christian­ The following spoke: Mr Gautier, Draftsman of the opi­ sen, Mr Brito Apolonia, Mr Guermeur, Mrs Van nion of the Committee on Economic Affairs, Mr Duarte Hemeldonck, Mr Fernandes Gomes and Mr Ripa di Cendan, on behalf of the Socialist'Group, Mrs Lentz- Meana, Member of the Commission. Cornette, on behalf of the EPP Group, Mr Gautier, The President declared the debate closed. who put a question to the speaker, Mr Sherlock, on behalf of the ED Group, Mr Maher, on behalf of the She announced that the vote would take place the fol­ Liberal Group, Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Com­ lowing morning (see part I, item 4 of the minutes of mission, Mr Gautier, who put a question to the Com­ 10 October 1986). mission which Mr Clinton Davis answered, Mr Gautier and Mr Clinton Davis. (The sitting was suspended at 8.10p.m. and resumed at The President declared the debate closed. 9.10p.m.) He stated that the vote on the motion for a resolution IN THE CHAIR: MR LALOR would take place the following morning (see part I, item 6 of the minutes of 10 October 1986). Vice-President

18. Community's relations with certain third countries 20. Woodland rabies (debate) in the transport sector (debate) Mrs Squarcialupi introduced her report, drawn up on MrTopmann introduced his report, on behalf of the behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Committee on Transport, on the Community's relations Health and Consumer Protection, on woodland rabies with certain third countries in the transport sector (Doc. (Doc. A 2-92/86). A 2-69/86.) The following spoke: Mr Raftery, on behalf of the EPP (') See Annex. Group, Mr Pearce, who put a question to Mr Raftery, No C 283/62 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86 Thursday, 9 October 1986 to which Mr Raftery replied, Mr Sherlock, on behalf of 21. Agenda for next sitting the ED Group, Mr Roelants du Vivier, on behalf of the Rainbow Group, Mrs Lienemann, Mr Maher, who put The President announced the following agenda for the a question to Mrs Lienemann which she answered, and sitting on Friday, 10 October: Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Commission. 9 a.m.: — procedure without report; The President declared the debate closed. — Aigner interim report on appropriations for Euro­ pean Schools (without debate); — vote on motions for resolutions on which the He stated that the vote would be held the following debate has closed; morning (see part I, item 7 of the minutes of 10 October — SEAL report on duty-free admission of fuel 1986). (debate and vote).

(The sitting was closed at 11.15 p.m.)

Enrico VINCI Nicole PERY

Secretary General Vice-President 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/63

Thursday, 9 October 1986

PART II

Texts adopted by the European Parliament

1. Natural disasters

(a) Doc. B2-900/86

RESOLUTION

on the disastrous whirlwind in the Bitburg/Priim region (Federal Republic of Germany)

The European Parliament,

A. whereas on 15 September 1986 in the region of Bitburg/Priim (Federal Republic of Germany) a sudden whirlwind in a matter of seconds damaged hundreds of houses, blew off roofs, destroyed outbuildings and laid waste agricultural land with the result that many people were left practically destitute;

B. whereas the means of livelihood of these people has been destroyed and efforts to contain the damage have been hampered by persistent rainfall;

1. Requests accordingly that emergency aid of 500 000 ECU should be made available from Chapter 96 of the Disaster Fund and be allocated — as a basis for making good the damage — without red-tape to those people who have practically lost their means of livelihood as a result of the storm; assumes in this context that the Regional Government of Rhinland-Pfalz will officially submit this request via the Federal Government to the Commission of the European Commu­ nities;

2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission and to the Regional Government of Rheinland-Pfalz.

(b) amendment replacing Docs. B2-901, 903, 926 and 931/86

RESOLUTION on the earthquake in the region of Kalamata in the prefecture of Messinia

The European Parliament,

A. deeply shocked at the widespread devastation caused by successive earthquakes on 13 Sep­ tember 1986 throughout the prefecture of Messinia and particularly in the town of Kalama­ ta,

B. whereas 68 % of the buildings in Kalamata have suffered serious damage and, in particular, of 3 678 buildings examined so far, 573 have been condemned as uninhabitable while another 590 have suffered serious damage,

C. whereas these earthquakes claimed scores of lives and left hundreds injured, and a large proportion of the population of Kalamata is now living under canvas facing hygiene and nutrition problems and the immediate risk of disease, No C 283/64 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

1. Calls on the Commission to submit immediately to the Council a proposal for special Community assistance to reconstruct the areas affected by the earthquake in Greece in September 1986;

2. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures as soon as possible to ensure that a subsidized interest loan is provided through the European Investment Bank and the NCIs;

3. Asks that the Community's structural funds should give absolute priority to financing work in the region of Kalamata on the most favourable terms possible;

4. Calls on the Commission to utilize immediately the appropriations of line 550 in the budget to enable the Mediterranean Programmes to be implemented smoothly;

5. Believes that these appropriations should be made available immediately and specifically allocated to reconstruction work and measures to revive economic activity which is being paralyzed throughout the region;

6. Requests that the Community provide financial assistance from specific budget headings (Article 670 in the budget) as a contribution to the maintenance of historical places and monu­ ments, projects to restore and preserve churches, historical monuments and traditional buildings in the prefecture of Messinia;

7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

(c) Doc. B2-932/86

RESOLUTION

on the recent devastation caused by storms and floods in Crete

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the widespread devastation caused by violent storms and floods on 23 and 24 September 1986 in the prefectures of Lasithi and Chania in Crete,

B. whereas in the general region of Hierapetra one-third of the area devoted to the hothouse production of early crops was completely devastated, while in the remaining area all the preparatory work (spraying, tilling etc.) was invalidated which will considerably delay future production; having regard also to the damage to large areas of olive trees,

C. whereas the cultivation of early crops constitutes the major source of income for producers in these regions of Crete, which places them and their families in a difficult economic posi­ tion,

D. having regard to the damage caused to the entire road network throughout the region of Hierapetra and the region's irrigation and drainage systems,

1. Calls on the Commission to assist in compensating producers in the devastated areas;

2. Calls for financial support to carry out land improvement, drainage and anti-flood projects to protect these regions from similar catastrophes in the future;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council. 10. 11. 86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/65

Thursday, 9 October 1986

(d) Doc. B2-927/86

RESOLUTION on the serious losses sustained by cattle breeders and farmers in certain regions of Spain

The European Parliament, A. having regard to the drought which has seriously affected certain regions of Spain, B. whereas the fodder crop has been very poor and cattle breeders have had to start using stocks intended for the forthcoming winter, C. whereas, as an immediate consequence, there has been a substantial increase in the price of fodder, D. whereas this grave situation has coincided with the market adjustments arising from the application of the principle of Community preference, which has forced up the traditional market price of fodder, E. whereas dairy production is the most important source of income for farmers in the areas in question, F. whereas the EEC has granted aid to France in the form of 400 000 tonnes of cereals to assist the cattle breeders affected,

1. Calls for a new quota to be set for the Spanish cattle breeders concerned, at a reduced price which includes transport costs, so that the needs of the affected areas can be met; 2. Also calls for emergency financial aid, based on an accurate evaluation of the consequences, to supplement the national measures taken to assist the farmers concerned; 3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council.

(e) Doc. B2-935/86

RESOLUTION on the disastrous floods in the Bordeaux region

The European Parliament, A. having regard to the violent storms and heavy rain which fell on the city of Bordeaux and neighbouring areas on the night of 23/24 September 1986, B. having regard to the serious flooding which within a few hours had devastated the city and forced 15 000 people to evacuate their homes,

1. Is seriously concerned at the results of the flooding which have caused damage not only to homes but also to a number of roads; 2. Calls, therefore, for urgent financial aid from the European Community for the immediate relief of the 15 000 victims and also for repairs to the damaged road links; 3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council. No C 283/66 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

(f) Doc. B2-944/86

RESOLUTION

on the effects of Typhoon Wayne

The European Parliament,

A. deeply concerned by the catastrophic effects of Typhoon Wayne, which ravaged five coastal provinces of Vietnam on 6 September 1986 and the days following, leaving 400 people dead and several thousands injured, and destroying 650 000 houses and numerous hospitals and schools, electrical supply lines, telecommunications installations, fishing boats and so on,

B. noting, in particular, the urgent appeals made by the Vietnamese authorities to the interna­ tional community for medical supplies, food and clothing,

1. Calls on the Commission to make available to the Vietnamese authorities emergency help in the form of food aid and medical supplies for the affected coastal areas; 2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission.

2. International'summits

(a) Amendment 1 to Doc. B2-913/86

RESOLUTION on the CCBMDE closing document from Stockholm, the forthcoming summit meeting in Reyk­ javik and the CSCE follow-up conference in Vienna

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the positive outcome of the Stockholm Conference on Confidence-Building Measures and Disarmament in Europe (CCBMDE),

B. convinced that a favourable climate has thereby been created for the success of all aspects of the CSCE follow-up conference in Vienna,

C. aware of the need to establish a peaceful community in Europe based on equal rights for all, and in particular the need jointly to promote fundamental rights and economic and social progress on the basis of a common history and certain common traditions,

1. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation (EPC): (a) to use the climate that has now been created to reach significant, binding and verifiable agreements in other fora where matters relating to security in Europe are discussed, (b) to examine the proceedings of the forthcoming summit to see to what extent European views on the political and economic aspects of security, as expressed in the Single European Act, are taken into account by the superpowers (including tangible progress towards the renunciation of force and respect for the territorial integrity of all States), to press these views vigorously in order to demonstrate where the European Community's interests lie, and to press the issue of verification, including the reduction of short and medium-range missiles, in all its contacts with the United States and the Soviet Union at every level, 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/67

Thursday, 9 October 1986

(c) resolutely to develop European consultation mechanisms on the political and economic aspects of European security, and to call on the Soviet Union to demonstrate its desire to achieve a security balance in Europe by discussing the question of equal priority for conven­ tional, and nuclear disarmament in Europe, (d) following the successful conclusion of the Stockholm Conference, to place increased emphasis on inalienable human rights at the CSCE follow-up conference in Vienna, apply and make vigorous use of the right of self-determination of peoples, which was confirmed in international law at Helsinki in 1975, in relation to the safeguarding of peace, and to extend the demand for verification expressed at Stockholm in principle to all areas of military security and cooperation;

2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation.

(b) Doc. B2-938/86

RESOLUTION

on the Reykjavik Summit

The European Parliament, \

A. having regard to the forthcoming meeting between the General Secretary of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev, and the President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, to be held in Reykjavik, Iceland, on 11 and 12 October 1986,

B. whereas this meeting was decided on a short time after the end of the Stockholm Conference, the outcome of which marked the first positive sign of a reversal in the trend in international relations currently characterized by severe tensions and intrasigence,

C. whereas the Stockholm agreement has proven that it really is possible to formulate construc­ tive regulations designed to strengthen collective security that can be effectively improved by the implementation of the confidence-building measures already decided,

D. whereas the US—USSR summit may provide an opportunity for reducing differences and improving mutual comprehension and trust, which are necessary conditions for reaching broad agreements on security and disarmament acceptable to both parties,

E. having regard to the importance of the USSR—US Geneva summit noted by the European Parliament and the need to respect the letter and the spirit of the agreements reached there,

F. stressing the fundamental role that the European Community should play to achieve these objectives by actively contributing to the positive development of the international situation and the maintenance of world peace,

G. having regard to its resolutions on the matter,

1. Welcomes the forthcoming meeting between the United States and the Soviet Union that may represent an important turning point in the current state of international relations; No C 283/68 Official Journal of the European Gommunities 10. 11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

2. Welcomes the agreements reached in Stockholm and calls on the 35 signatory countries to the Helsinki Final Act to pursue this route with courage in the third CSCE which is to commence in Vienna on 4 November 1986;

3. Is convinced that only through detente, dialogue and peaceful negotiations between the parties can the problems and crises confronting the international community be resolved and hopes that a real political will to achieve these goals emerges from the Reykjavik summit;

4. Confirms the urgent need to halt the intractable arms race, based on increasingly sophisti­ cated and uncontrollable defence systems, with a view to stepping up moves connected with peace, international solidarity and the implementation of new models of economic develop­ ment;

5. Requests, in this context, that the dialogue between the heads of government embrace the definition of concrete agreements that sanction: 1. the gradual and balanced reduction of all kinds of nuclear and conventional arsenals, 2. the removal, as a first stage, of medium-range missiles by the US and the USSR, 3. an embargo on nuclear experiments, 4. the refusal to militarize space, 5. arms controls, 6. the creation of nuclear and chemical-free zones, particularly in northern and central Europe;

6. Calls on the Foreign Ministers and the governments of the Member States to monitor closely, at all stages, in permanent consultation with the allies, developments in the negotiations once under way;

7. Considers that the European Community should be at hand with its own constructive proposals in the East-West dialogue to establish detente on a permanent basis and contribute towards overcoming the system of opposing blocks and to the peaceful solution of major problems within the international community;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation, the governments of the Member States of the Community, of the Soviet Union and of the United States, and the UN.

(c) Doc. B2-942/86

RESOLUTION

on the absence of Europe from summit meetings

The European Parliament,

A. noting the agreement reached in Stockholm on the introduction of control and security measures and on disarmament in relation to conventional weapons,

B. noting that, at the forthcoming meeting in Reykjavik between President Reagan and Mr Gorbachev, subjects which are of fundamental interest to the Member States will be discussed without their participation, 10.-11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No G 283/69 Thursday, 9 October 1986

1. Regrets the fact that the European Community is not in a position to take part in an international conference which will give priority to discussing matters relating to its own secur­ ity; 2. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation to convene an emergency meeting to adopt a common position on the subjects which will be on the agenda of the proposed summit to follow the Reykjavik meeting and to communicate this to the participants;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation, the Commission, the Council and the governments of the United States and the Soviet Union.

3. Human rights

(a) Doc. B2-918/86

RESOLUTION

on hostages in the Lebanon

The European Parliament, A. deeply shocked by the kidnapping in Beirut on 30 September of Jean-Mare Sroussi, a French TV cameraman, and by the attempted kidnapping of British writer David Hirst,

B. disturbed to note that there are presently 12 Community citizens held hostage by armed groups in the Lebanon,

C. recalling that eight of the hostages are French — Marcel Carton (embassy attache), Marcel Fontaine (vice-consul), Jean-Paul Kauffman (journalist), Michel Seurat (research scientist), Aurel Cornea (TV journalist), Jean-Louis Normandin (TV journalist), Camille Sontag (re­ tired) and Marcel Khodari (retired); that two are British, John McCarthy (TV journalist) and Alex Collett (UNWRA official); that one is Irish, Brian Keened (university lecturer) and one Italian, Alberto Colinari (businessman),

D. distressed by the fact that some of these have been held hostage for more than a year and that, in some cases, their families do not know whether they are alive or dead,

1." Urges the Twelve to work together within the Trevi Group and elsewhere for a solution to the problem of hostages held by extremist groups;

2. Believes that the Twelve, having formed a joint political view on how to act when their citizens are taken hostage, should approach those governments which have influence with the armed groups in the Lebanon including Libya, Syria and Iran, as well as the Lebanese govern­ ment, to remind them of their responsibilities in the protection of innocent life and to seek ways of securing the hostages' release;

3. Invites the Twelve to discuss the problem with the United States government, six of whose citizens are also held hostage in the Lebanon;

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation, the government of the Lebanon, and also the governments of Libya, Syria and Iran. No C 283/70 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

(b) Doc. B2-912/86

RESOLUTION on the death sentences carried out recently in Indonesia

The European Parliament,

A." taking note of the death sentences recently carried out in Indonesia, B. taking the view that it is inhumane to carry out death sentences after 20 years' imprison­ ment,

C. perturbed that executions have again taken place despite the concern voiced by the Commu­ nity after the executions in May 1985, D. concerned that other prisoners are likely to share the same fate.

1. Condemns this manner of proceeding;

2. Appeals again to the Indonesian authorities henceforth to observe the fundamental princi­ ples of humanity;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation and the government of the Indonesian Republic.

(c) amendment replacing Docs. B2-925, 937 and 939/86

RESOLUTION on the execution of political prisoners in Indonesia

The European Parliament,

A. disturbed by the report that, on 26 September 1986, the Indonesian Government executed a further nine people, including the former PKI members Bono Waluyo, sentenced to death on 9 October 1968, Supono, sentenced to death on 11 March 1972 and Syam, sentenced to death on 10 March 1968; Alihamy, Hanafiah, Kamil, Wiroatmojo, Hidayat and Sudiono were also executed,

B. whereas dozens of others have been detained under the same circumstances, i.e. after being sentenced to death because of their political opposition to the military regime in 1965, C. having regard to its previous statements in which it strongly condemned the five executions in

1. Considers it a flagrant violation of human rights to execute a person almost 20 years after the death sentence was passed;

2. Calls on the Foreign Ministers meeting m Political Cooperation to condemn these, execu­ tions and to call upon the Indonesia Government to treat the other prisoners in accordance with international conventions relating to basic human rights;

3. Calls on the Commission to draw up a comprehensive report on relations between the Community and Indonesia and to review those relations in the light of the report and the recent executions by the Indonesian Government; 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/71

Thursday, 9 October 1986

4. Calls on the Commission to raise Ihe question of the executions and the situation of the other political prisoners in its contacts with the Indonesian authorities and in the framework of its contacts with the ASEAN countries in Djakarta on 20 and 21 October 1986; 5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the President of Indonesia.

(d) Doc. B2-921/86

RESOLUTION on the situation in Chile

The European Parliament, A. whereas 11 September last week was the 13th anniversary of the fascist coup which brutally ended the constitutional democratic government in Chile, under President Salvador Allende, B. whereas over this long period, Pinochet's fascist regime has subjected the people of Chile to cruel repression, through the abolition of the most elementary democratic freedoms, the assassination and 'disappearance' of many thousands of people and the brutal worsening of the people's living conditions, C. whereas in the difficult conditions created by the fascist dictatorship, the people, democrats and antifascists, have heroically resisted, intensifying their struggle everyday and thus expressing the Chilean people's firm determination to put an end to the dictatorship and regain democratic freedoms, D. whereas, feeling itself isolated and seriously threatened by the popular movement, Pinochet's regime has established martial law, starting another wave of repression with mass imprison­ ments, military occupation of many poor areas, the assassination of democrats, etc.,

1. Reaffirms its thorough condemnation of the fascist regime established in Chile; 2. Condemns the recent establishment of martial law and the resulting criminal increase in repression, and demands an immediate end to these measures and the immediate release of all political prisioners; 3. Declares its solidarity with the people of Chile and the forces of democracy in their struggle to regain freedom; 4. Calls on all democratic countries and in particular the members of the EEC to adopt effective measures for the political, diplomatic, economic and military isolation of the fascist dictatorship in Chile; 5. Calls for an immediate return to democracy in Chile in accordance with the free choice of the Chilean people; 6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation, the UN and to all democratic movements in Chile. No C 283/72 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

(e) Doc. B2-922/86

RESOLUTION

on the increase in human rights violations in Guatemala

The European Parliament,

A. whereas in Guatemala in January 1986 there was a partial change from a military dictatorship to a democratically elected government,

B. whereas since 1982 alone more than 40 000 civilians have been murdered by the army, the security forces and the death squads, as part of a new strategy to quell insurgency and political opposition,

C. whereas the murder and disappearance of individuals through the action of Guatemalan security forces has persisted ever since the restoration of democracy in January this year; in the first six months of the Cerezo government official figures show that 107 people were murdered and 38 disappeared,

D. alarmed at the report published in Guatemala by the Socialist Party of Guatemala (PSD) of a massacre perpetrated by the military in mid-August this year on the population of the village of Aldea Semuy/Alta Verapaz, in which 89 civilians are said to have lost their lives,

E. whereas in particular committed trade unionists, student leaders, left-wing opposition politi­ cians, witnesses to military crimes and members of the only human rights organization operating inside the country, GAM (Grupo de Apuyo Mutuo), are being repressed, threatened and murdered,

F. deeply concerned at the news that the life of the President of GAM, Nineth Garcia, who visited Europe in April 1986 and passed through Brussels, has been repeatedly threatened by people in civilian dress and recently also by the uniformed military,

G. appalled by the announcement by the military in the Guatemalan newspaper 'Prensa Libre' on 18 September, accusing the GAM of'wicked conspiracy against the honour, safety and prestige of the military forces' as well as 'provocative malignment',

H. concerned at the statement by President Vinicio Gerezo that 'after a certain time' he will no longer be able to guarantee the safety of Nineth Garcia,

I. deploring the fact that to date President Vinicio Cerezo has failed to honour, and has even denied his repeated statements to GAM with regard to the creation of an international commission to investigate past crimes,

J. whereas President Vinicio Cerezo is at present in Europe and on 10 October will be in Brussels to negotiate with the Commission of the European Community on his country's situation and the possibilities for Community support,

K. whereas, after taking his oath of office, President Vinicio Gerezo dissolved the DIT, a security force rightly suspected of numerous infringements of the fundamental rights of habeas corpus; whereas, however, members of this force have resumed their functions in another official security body known as G2,

L. whereas'the efforts being made by President Vinicio Cerezo, himself a victim of the repression during General Rios Montt's regime, should be encouraged; whereas, however, the parlia­ mentary committee on human rights established in the new congress must be given access to the files on violations of human rights, which are covered at present by the decree of amnesty that the outgoing military government adopted on its own behalf immediately before Presi­ dent Vinicio Cerezo took his oath of office, 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/73 Thursday, 9 October 1986

1., Expresses its deep concern that Guatemala's civilian government clearly does not have the situation under control with regard to human rights violations and the confrontation between the army and the civilian population and that power therefore is still in the hands of the military forces;

2. Calls on the President of Guatemala specifically to repeal Decree 8-86 forthwith and to take the necessary legal steps without delay to ensure that the amnesty for the military forces, granted by themselves, which is contained in that decree, is repealed;

3. Calls on President Vinicio Cerezo to respond favourably to the demands drawn up by GAM and the parliamentary committee on human rights;

4. Calls on the civilian government to affirm its authority and to demonstrate more clearly its concern for human rights, by allowing the Guatemalan parliamentary committee on human rights to fulfil its task and by authorizing fact-finding missions in the country by independent organi­ zations such as Amnesty International and America's Watch;

5. Calls on President Vinicio Cerezo to ensure the protection of Nineth Garcia and the other members of GAM after her return from Europe, so that she can continue her work unhin­ dered;

6. Calls on Commissioner Cheysson in his negotiations with President Vinicio Cerezo on 10 October in Brussels, — to promise support only if it has no direct or indirect bearing on the anti-insurgency programme developed by the military dictatorships and continued under the civilian govern­ ment, — to promote projects and schemes only if they are aimed at real improvement in the living conditions of the people and — to speak out against any compulsory repatriation of Guatemalan refugees;

7. Calls on the Community Member States to work resolutely to ensure that human rights violations and violence in Guatemala is considered during the 41st UN General Assembly this year and that a permanent UN observer is sent to Guatemala;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States and the Guatemalan President.

(f) Doc. B2-924/86

RESOLUTION

on human rights in certain countries in Central and South America

The European Parliament,

A. aware from Amnesty International reports that many human rights activists in various countries in Central and South America have disappeared or been executed without trial, detained or tortured in recent months by members of the security forces or by unidentified armed attackers, in what appears to be an attempt to impede the work of defending human rights,

B. whereas in the majority of cases the persons involved were members of groups and organi­ zations which had previously been subjected to human rights violations by the authorities: human rights organizations, associations of the families of those who have disappeared or died, church bodies, etc., No C 283/74 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

C. whereas these groups are the only channel through which information may be obtained on the victims of human rights violations in Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, El Salvador and Peru,

D. whereas the cases of the following specific individuals are among those which have been denounced: Maria Teresa Tula de Canals, from El Salvador, abducted on several occasions, tortured and raped, and her compatriots Rafael Antonio Terezon Ramos, Miguel Angel Rosel Montenegro and Herbert Ernesto Amaya Sanabria, who were all tortured and intimidated; in Guatemala, Nineth Montenegro de Garcia, harassed and intimidated; in Chile, Gustavo Villalobos, Ramiro Olivares, Ramon Rojas, Julia Bascunan, Alvaro Reyes and Juan Macaya, all of whom were imprisoned; in Colombia, Antonio Emiliano Hernandez Nino, who was murdered, and Guillermo Marin, tortured and left half-dead; in Peru, Guadalupe Callocunto Olano, who was twice detained and imprisioned and has recently been released,

1. Requests the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation to ask the governments of the countries mentioned to investigate and clear up the case of each person referred to, and to take whatever further steps may be necessary;

2. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation.

(g) Doc, B2-920/86/rev.

RESOLUTION

on an initiative concerning negotiations within the Council on the drawing up of a common European policy on refugees

The European Parliament,

A. recognizing the 1951 United Nations Convention on the status of refugees (Geneva Conven­ tion) which lays down the basic principles for granting the right of asylum and for the protection of refugees,

B. stressing the provisions of the 1965 convention on racism which prohibit any discrimination on the basis of race, colour, origin or any other reason,

C. aware of the particular responsibility incumbent on the Community institutions in this area and having regard especially to the joint declaration, which was the outcome of the Evrigenis report, recently signed by them,

D. having regard to the own-initiative report by Mr Vetter on the problems of the right of asylum which is being drawn up by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights,

E. having regard to its oral questions to the Commission (0-141/85) and the Council (0-142/85) on efforts to establish a common European policy on refugees,

F. recognizing, however, that the situation at present in all the Member States of the Community with regard to the right of asylum and the problems of refugees calls for immediate initia­ tives.

1. Calls on the Council to start negotiations as soon as possible with the Member States with a view to drawing up agreements and joint provisions on a European policy on refugees;

2. Considers that a common policy must be based on the human rights policy advocated by the European Parliament; 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/75

Thursday, 9 October 1986

3. Considers that it is both natural and desirable to seek a common solution to the serious problems facing the Member States experiencing difficulties in accommodating the relatively high number of refugees applying to them in order to avoid 'exporting' the problems from one Member State to another, since such a 'pass the parcel' situation is humiliating both for the refugees and for our free and democratic societies;

4. Proposes that a common solution should involve common definitions of'political refugees', common standards with regard to a reasonable and acceptable distribution of the refugees who arrive at the Community's frontiers requesting asylum and common provisions with regard to the treatment meted out to these people; 5. Proposes that, to maximize the implementation of the measures referred to in the previous paragraph, the Community's relevant bodies initiate a study on the possibility and advisability of the Community acceding to the UN Convention on refugees; 6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States.

4. Border controls

(a) Doc. B2-907/86

RESOLUTION on the use of border controls to combat terrorism

The European Parliament, A. having regard to the decisions taken by the Ministers of the Interior at the London conference on security, B. having regard to the decisions taken by the Heads of State and Government in on 3 December 1985, C. having regard to its previous resolutions calling for a plan to combat terrorism, and especially its resolution of 11 September 1986 ('),

1. Welcomes the determination of the Ministers of the Interior to step up the fight against terrorism in the European Community by taking joint action and recommends including the competent Ministers of Justice in the joint action; 2. Points out that controls at intra-Community borders are an inappropriate means of com­ bating terrorism and merely divert from the need for closer cooperation across national bord­ ers; 3. Considers that coordination of investigations, joint patrols in border areas, closer cooper­ ation between the authorities concerned, improved judicial assistance arrangements and simpler rules for 'hot pursuit' across the Community's internal borders are more appropriate means of ensuring that frontiers no longer spell safety for terrorists on the run; 4. Calls on the governments of the Member States, in the context of European Political Cooperation, to work towards the harmonization of their laws on asylum, firearms and foreigners (issue of visas, etc.) in stages over four years (i.e. by the end of 1990) and in connection with drug smuggling, in particular, to step up controls at the Community's external frontiers (including ports and airports).

(') See minutes of that day's sitting (11.9. 1986). » No C 283/76 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

5. Repeats its call for more effective cooperation between the security services and forces within the Community and, to this end, the establishment of a European anti-terrorism centre;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Ministers of the Interior and the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation and parlia­ ments of the Member States.

(b) Doc. B2-911/86

RESOLUTION on the wave of terrorist attacks in Paris

The European Parliament,

A. recalling its previous resolutions condemning acts of terrorism, particularly the resolution adopted in September 1986 following the attacks in Istanbul and Karachi, B. noting with dismay the new wave of attacks in Paris, of a kind which has not been seen since the war in Algeria, and which led to 10 people being killed and more than 160 being injured between 12 and 17 September 1986, C. noting the new threats towards France which have been made by terrorist groups,

1. Expresses its sympathy with the families of the victims; 2. Reiterates the need to demonstrate firmness and not to give in to blackmail; 3. Welcomes the closer cooperation between police forces and anti-terrorist intelligences agencies which was agreed by the Interior Ministers of the Twelve at the meeting of the Trevi Group in London on 25 September 1986;

4. Considers that if third countries are proved to be involved in the preparation and perpetra­ tion of these acts of terrorism, the Member States must draw the appropriate conclusions; 5. Calls for the early ratification, by those Member States which have not yet done so of the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism, which was signed in the context of the Council of Europe;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the governments of the Member States.

(c) Doc. B2-930/86

RESOLUTION on the introduction of a visa requirement in France

The European Parliament,

A. having regard to the French Government's decision to require citizens of non-EEC countries (except Switzerland) to hold a visa, B. having regard to the Council of Europe's criticism of this measure. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/77 Thursday, 9 October 1986

1. Considers that the visa requirement is a discrimination against citizens in non-EEC coun­ tries which are allied to or have other direct links with the French people;

2. Takes the view that terrorism should be combated by international cooperation and not just by unilateral national measures;

3. Considers that the causes of terrorism may be found in internal as well as external political conditions, and accordingly that the fight against terrorism should not be based only on police intervention;

4. Calls on the French Government to abolish the visa requirement;

5. Calls on the Commission to investigate the legality of the visa requirement, in particular in respect of European countries with association agreements and other forms of cooperation with the Community; 6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the French Govern­ ment, the Council of Europe and the European Human Rights Commission.

5. Nuclear safety

(a) Doc. B2-914/86

RESOLUTION

on a European conference on nuclear safety

The European Parliament,

— - having regard to its resolutions of 15 May 19860) and 11 September 1986 (2) on the problems of nuclear safety, — having regard to the Treaties establishing the European Community,

A. whereas in particular the EAEC Treaty obliges the European Community to coordinate national research and development in the field of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,

B. whereas in signing the EAEC Treaty the Member States have undertaken to 'foster progress in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy' (Title 1, Article 2(h),

C. whereas Chapter III, on health and safety, and Chapter VII, on safeguards, of the EAEC Treaty commit the Community to drawing up basic common regulations,

D. whereas the Chernobyl accident highlighted the need to embark on detailed discussion to determine the effectiveness of the means available to the Community to fulfil the undertak­ ings of the EAEC Treaty,

E. having regard to the initiatives put forward by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) following the Soviet nuclear accident,

F. having regard to the reactions of the Member States following the Chernobyl accident and their intention to encourage detailed reflection,

(') OJ No C 148, 16. 6. 1986, pp. 88/89. (2) See minutes of proceedings for that date. No C 283/78 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

1. Repeats its request to arrange at an early date a European conference on safety and the coordination of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to determine the role of the European Community in the world context;

2. Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of making amendments to the EAEC Treaty and the means it offers to effectively increase the Community's coordinating and controll­ ing role in the field of nuclear energy;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and Council.

(b) Doc. B2-936/86

RESOLUTION

on the next CSCE meeting =

The European Parliament,

A. whereas on 1 August 1975 in the Helsinki Final Act the representatives of the 35 co-signatory states of Europe and North America laid down the basic principles for their relations in their efforts to achieve peace, security, justice and respect for human rights in Europe,

B. whereas application of these principles is of fundamental importance in fulfilling European hopes for the 'unification of the European continent', expressed by the European Parliament in its resolution adopted on 14 February 1985 ('),

C. whereas, however, the repeated violations of the Final Act by the totalitarian regimes of the USSR and other Central and Eastern European countries have jeopardized these hopes and the prospects of greater security and cooperation in Europe,

D. whereas the deteriorating living conditions in these countries increase the disparities between the different regions of the continent and hamper the progress of all,

E. having regard to the political tensions which have followed and the increasing numbers of arms, which endanger the peace of the continent,

F. having regard to the resolutions of the European Parliament on certain specific problems such as security, trade between the Community and the states of Central and Eastern Europe, including the USSR, and the resolution of 22 October 1985 on human rights in the world in 1984 and Community policy on human rights (2),

G. whereas a plenary meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) is to be held in Vienna, Austria, in November 1986,

1. Considers that a comprehensive policy must be drawn up in respect of each state in Central and Eastern Europe, including the USSR, and that activities must be coordinated in the various areas referred to in the Helsinki Final Act (security, trade, cultural exchanges, human rights, rights of peoples, etc.) and as regards the Community's policies in respect of each of these states;

2. Calls for this policy to satisfy the aspirations of all Europeans for freedom, justice and prosperity;

(') OJ No C 72, 18. 3. 1985, p. 66. (2) OJNoC343, 31. 12. 1985, p. 29. 10. 11. 86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/79

Thursday, 9 October 1986

3. Calls on the governments of the Member States of the Community to demand specific measures from the governments of Central and Eastern Europe (including the USSR) with regard to respect for human rights, the right of peoples to self-determination, freedom of religion, together with political, economic and cultural guarantees;

4. Proposes that economic, cultural, political or other measures should be considered and implemented to enable the divisions in Europe to be broken down; 5. Considers that unification of the continent in respect for the freedoms of the people, political pluralism, trade union rights and the freedom of economic initiative is the common aspiration of all the people of Europe; 6. Affirms the European Community's willingness to assist peoples in their efforts to achieve these objectives; 7. Invites the governments of the Member States of the European Community to establish a common position to this effect for the next meeting of the CSCE in Vienna on 4 November 1986; 8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

6. Drug abuse in the Community

- Amendment replacing Docs. B2-875, 884 and 887/86

RESOLUTION

on the drug problem

The European Parliament, A. having regard to the report and recommendations of its Committee of Inquiry on the drugs problem (Doc. A2-114/86), B. having regard to the declaration at the Hague Summit, indicating the willingness of Member States to take concerted action against the drug problem, C. appalled by Member States' reluctance to acknowledge the extent of the problem, D. whereas the policies pursued so far by Member States have not prevented the further exten­ sion of the problem which has now reached alarming proportions, E. alarmed at the worrying increase in the drug problem, F. whereas the illegal drug traffic is carried on by criminal organizations with immense resources and capital at their disposal, G. whereas the activities of these organizations extend far beyond drug trafficking, even influenc­ ing the political and economic system in many cases and many countries, H. whereas furthermore the policies pursued to date by Member States have been of little avail with regard to: (i) suppression, with an average of 5 % of illegal substances actually seized, (ii) prevention, with too little and often inappropriate action, (iii)rehabilitation and reintegration into society, owing to a lack of resources and the unwill­ ingness of society as a whole to offer proper solutions, especially for young people, No C 283/80 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

I. pointing out to all the institutions of the Community their duty to improve living and working conditions which is the basis of the EEC Treaty,

1. Submits the attached draft resolution to the Council of Ministers;

2. Urges the Council formally to adopt this resolution without delay;

3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution, together with the report and recommen­ dations of the Committee of Inquiry into the drugs problem in the Member States of the Community, to the Council and Commission;

COUNCIL RESOLUTION

on concerted action to tackle the drugs problem

The Council of the European Communities,

— having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

— recalling the declaration of the European Council at The Hague which recognized the need for action at Community level to tackle the drugs problem,

— having regard to the report and recommendations of the European Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the drugs problem in the Member States of the Community (Doc. A2- 114/86);

Undertakes to:

1. Develop joint Community policies to alleviate the alarming rise and rapidly changing nature of the drugs problem by tackling all links in the international chain from production and supply to demand and final consumption, while confirming the illegality of those drugs as laid down in the United Nations Conventions;

2. Asks the Commission to organize a European conference to study all the effects and implications of drug use in order to assess inter alia the activities of criminal organizations and in particular the health and social consequences of drugs;

3. Provide increased funds for drug crop substitution programmes and to bring greater political and economic pressure to bear on producer countries to ensure their full cooperation in these programmes and in the elimination of clandestine processing laboratories;

4. Tackle the problem of crop conversion in the spirit of solidarity of the Lome Convention and in the framework of comprehensive help for the producer countries which are usually poor, backward and under despotic rule;

5. Establish strict controls on Community exports and imports of known chemicals and precursors used in manufacturing illegal drugs;

6. Take concerted action at the forthcoming meeting of the Ministers of Justice on 20 October 1986 to establish practical guidelines for the sentencing of drug traffickers, procedures for their extradition and the freezing and confiscation of their assets;

7. Spare no effort to combat those criminal organizations which exercise control over the institutions of the state in many producer countries and are furthermore engaged in arms trafficking and terrorism;

8. Introduce effective measures for dealing with money laundering by drug traffickers and their accomplices, inter alia by the introduction of a Community directive on currency transaction reporting; 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/81

Thursday, 9 October 1986

9. Amend existing customs regulations providing for the seizure of goods to the extent neces­ sary to cover the seizure of all illegal drugs traded within the Community on a common basis, and to ensure a common approach to inter alia controlled deliveries;

10. Provide support for the establishment of new mechanisms for closer cooperation between the customs authorities of the 12 Member States with respect to the detection of drugs;

11. Ensure that every Member State of the Community has a central drugs intelligence agency and that mechanisms are established to coordinate their activities. In order to facilitate exchanges of information and research, resources will be provided when necessary so that action can be taken to ensure that the police and customs computer information systems in the various ' Member States are compatible;

12. Improve as a matter of extreme urgency the facilities and provide adequate resources for: (a) preventive education at all levels of society, which is the most important strategy in tackling drug abuse in our society, (b) rehabilitation and treatment of addicts;

13. Calls on the Commission to ensure the early implementation of a decision to place consumer education on the school curriculum; indeed only a conscious attitude towards consum­ er goods, drugs in general and medicines, can save people, especially the young from the pleasure of imitation and following the fashion of their peers;

14. Draw up a set of guidelines to be used by local authorities in planning for the reintegration of treated addicts into society, using, where possible, the European Social Fund;

15. Draw up proposals for the establishment of a Community research and information centre on drugs problems in its next preliminary draft budget;

16. Participate fully in and contribute to the activities of international organizations involved in the fight against drug trafficking and drug abuse, prevention and treatment.

7. Immigration policy

(a) Doc. B2-881/86

RESOLUTION

on Community policy on migration

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the guidelines on migration policy contained in the Commission's proposal of 1 March 1985 0),

— having regard to the European Parliament's resolution of 9 May 1985 (2),

— having regard to the Council resolution of 16 July 1985 <3),

(') COM(85)48. (-) OJ No C 141, 10. &. 1985, p. 462. (') OJ No C 186, 26. 7. 1985. p. 3. No C 283/82 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

— having regard to the Joint Declaration by the three institutions against racism and xenopho­ bia ('),

— having regard to the European Parliament's resolution of 16 November 1977 on the granting of special rights to the citizens of the European Community in implementation of the Paris Summit of December 1974 (point 11 of the Final Communique) (2) and its resolution of 7 June 1983 on the right to vote in local elections (3),

— having regard to the final report of the ad hoc Committee on a People's Europe (4) and the European Parliament's resolution of 13 November 1985 (5),

A. having regard to the need to establish fully Community citizens' right to freedom of move­ ment,

B. having regard to the Commission's recent communication on recognition of the right of citizens of the Member States of the European Community to vote in local elections (6),

C. whereas recognition of the right to vote in local elections for Community citizens residing in another Member State is an essential factor in the creation of a People's Europe,

D. whereas recognition of this right also implies extending to citizens of Member States other rights connected with taking part in community life, especially the right to freedom of association, the right to participate in meetings and to belong to political parties,

E. having regard moreover to the urgent need for concerted action by the Member States to lay down appropriate guidelines with regard to migrant workers in the Community,

1. Calls on the Commission: (a) to implement the Council's conclusions concerning: — the application and wider publicizing of the current regulations on migration, — an analysis of the rights of Community workers and the details regarding their acceptance and participation in the life of the country where they live, — the adaptation of Community rules on social security; (b) to submit, in accordance with the line of thought already being pursued, precise proposals on the exercise of the right to vote in local elections for Community citizens and on the recognition of the right to freedom of expression and association under the conditions provided for in Parliament's abovementioned resolution of 9 May 1985 (paragraph 4(b)); (c) to submit a proposal to guarantee Community citizens access to employment in the public administration of other Member States where they are residing, in accordance with the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Communities; (d) to open up ongoing dialogue with migrant workers' organizations, making provision for adequate financial support;

2. Calls on the Council and the Commission to set in motion cooperation between the Member States on questions of migration policy affecting workers from third countries;

3. Calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to take prompt action on all the other requests made in the European Parliament's resolution of 9 May 1985;

(') OJ No C 176, 14. 7. 1986, p. 62, (2) OJ No C 299, 12. 12. 1977, p: 26. (3) OJ No C 184, 11. 7. 1983, p. 28. (4) SN/2536/3/85. (5) OJ No C 345, 31.12. 1985, p. 27. (6) COM(86) 487. 10. 11. 86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/83

Thursday, 9 October 1986

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the competent authorities in the Member States.

(b) Doc. B2-882/86

RESOLUTION

on Community policy on migration

The European Parliament, — having regard to its resolution of 8 May 1985 closing the procedure for consultation of the European Parliament on the communication from the Commission of the European Com­ munities to the Council on guidelines for a Community policy on migration together with a draft Council resolution (') and the Evrigenis report on the findings of the Committee of Inquiry into the Rise of Facism and Racism in Europe (Doc. A2-160/85), — having regard to the Joint Declaration against racism and xenophobia (2),

1. Calls on the Commission to draw up a report on the implementation of the proposals made in the abovementioned resolution and report, particularly as regards: — more effective action against the resurgence of racism and xenophobia, — civil and political rights, particularly the granting of the right to vote in local elections for migrant workers, — development of employment policy and increase in vocational training, — school and culture, — social security and social welfare, — taking account of the problems faced by migrant women, — repatriation policy, — special problems of non-Community immigrants; 2. Calls for the creation of a migrant workers'forum; 3. Calls on the Commission to exert stricter controls over the Member States to ensure that they apply Community directives and regulations and do not adopt provisions contrary to the Treaties, or to the Joint Declaration against racism and xenophobia; 4. Instructs its Committee on Social Affairs strongly to urge the Commission to implement rapidly the tangible provisions contained in the abovementioned resolution and report; 5. Requests the Commission to publish the findings of the study it has has carried out concerning the laws on racial discrimination in the Member States; 6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission.

(') OJ No C 141, 10.6. 1985, p. 462.- (2) OJ No C 176, 14. 7. 1986, p. 62. No C 283/84 Official Journal of the European Communities 10.11. 86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

(c) Doc. B2-883/86

RESOLUTION

on Community policy on migration

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council on guidelines for a Community policy on migration (COM(85) 48 final),

- having regard to the Council resolution of 16 July 1985 on guidelines for a Community policy on migration ('),

- having regard to the Joint Declaration by the three institutions against racism and xenopho­ bia, which was signed on 11 June 1986 (2),

1. Welcomes the sensitivity shown by the Community institutions in signing the Joint Decla­ ration against racism and xenophobia;

2. Deplores, however, that nothing has been done to take the measures necessary to implement the actions provided for in the abovementioned Council resolution of 16 July 1985;

3. Points out that the deadline of 1986 (the year by the end of which the Council undertook to make use of all instruments for the application of the measures contained in paragraph 44 of the communication) will certainly not be met; stresses, however, that this does not mean that the submission of tangible proposals should be further delayed;

4. Calls on the Council to implement the measures proposed by the Commission in paragraph 44 of its communication, which are to some extent in line with the concept of the people's Europe;

5. Points to the urgent need to take steps within the Council to adopt the proposal for a directive on the right of residence of citizens of the Member States in the territory of another Member State, to ensure that the principle of the free movement of workers is accepted and applied in its fullest sense;

6. Calls on the institutions to enter a new item in the 1987 draft budget to cover the campaign to make 'all citizens aware of the dangers of racism and xenophobia' (paragraph 5 of the Joint Declaration);

7. Draws attention to the measures recently adopted by some Member States of the Commu­ nity following the wave of terrorism, pledging their agreement to closer Community and inter­ national cooperation to combat terrorism; however, points to the need to ensure that these measures do not threaten the rights of migrant workers and to reject any attempt to link the question of migration to that of combatting terrorism, inner city tension and criminality;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.

(') OJNoC186,26. 7. 1985, p. 3. (2) OJ No C 176, 14. 7. 1986, p. 62. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/85 Thursday, 9 October 1986

8. Position of Parliament in the context of actions for annulment brought before the Court of Justice

- Doc. A2-71/86/rev.

RESOLUTION on the position of the European Parliament in the context of actions for annulment brought before the Court of Justice under Article 173 of the EEC Treaty

The European Parliament, — having regard to the Treaties establishing the European Economic Community, the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Coal and Steel Community, in particular Article 164 of the EEC Treaty, Article 136 of the EAEC Treaty, Article 31 of the ECSC Treaty, Article 173 of the EEC Treaty, Article 146 of the EAEC Treaty and Article 33 of the ECSC Treaty as well as Article 175 of the EEC Treaty, Article 148 of the EAEC Treaty and the first and third paragraphs of Article 35 of the ECSC Treaty, — having regard to the Treaties of 21 April 1970 and 22 July 1975 amending certain budgetary provisions, — having regard to the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage, — having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of 23 April 1986 in Case 294/83 {Parti Ecologiste 'Les Verts'v. European Parliament) and the opinion of the Advocate General of 4 December 1985, — having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A2-71/86),

A. whereas the Community's institutional system is subject to the requirements of a legal system within the Court of Justice which is responsible for reviewing the legality of the acts of the Institutions, B. whereas the Court of Justice has ruled that an interpretation of Article 173 of the Treaty according to which the acts of the European Parliament were excluded from those which might be contested would lead to a result contrary both the spirit of the Treaty as expressed in Article 164 and to its overall scheme (')," C. whereas the Court of Justice has ruled that actions for annulment are 'to ensure, as required by Article 164, observance of the law in the interpretation and application of the Treaty' and that 'it would be inconsistent with this objective to interpret the conditions under which the action is admissible ... restrictively' (2),

1. Welcomes the Court's statement that the European Economic Community is a Community governed by the rule of law so that neither its Member States nor its institutions can avoid a review of whether or not their acts are in conformity with its basic constitutional document, the Treaty; 2. Notes that, by means of an interpretation of Article 173 of the EEC Treaty, the Court of Justice declared admissible an action for annulment brought against acts of the European Parliament intended to have legal force with regard to third parties; 3. Observes that the finding by the Court that the EEC Treaty 'established a complete system of legal remedies' implies that the European Parliament also has the right to bring actions under Article 173 and so has created the necessary balance in relations between the institutions; 4. Stresses the fact that acts which it has adopted in connection with its own internal organi­ zation, which have legal effects only within Parliament and which can be reviewed under procedures laid down in its Rules of Procedure must be exempted from a review of their legality by the Court of Justice;

(') Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 23 April 1986 in Case 294/83, Les Verts v. European Parliament, paragraph 25 of the decision. (2) Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 31 March 1971 in Case 22/70, Commission v. Council, [1971] ECR 277, paragraphs 40 and 41 of the decision. No C 283/86 Official Journal of the European Communities 10.11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of its committee to the governments of the Member States, the Council and the Commission.

9. Cooperation between the institutions in the examination of petitions

- Doc. A2-74/86

RESOLUTION

on initiatives to strengthen cooperation between the institutions in the examination of petitions submitted to the European Parliament

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Treaties establishing the European Communities,

— having regard to Rules 108-110 of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the Joint Declaration of 5 April 1977 (') in which the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission stress the prime importance they attach to the protection of fudamental rights,

— having regard to the Solemn Declaration of the European Council meeting in Stuttgart on 19 June 1983, and in particular Item 2.3 concerning the European Parliament,

— having regard to its resolution of 14 February 1984 laying down the draft of a Treaty of European Union (2), Article 18 of which provides for the establishment of the right of citizens to address petitions to the European Parliament,

— having regard to the conclusions of the European Council meeting in Milan on 28 and 29 June 1985 approving the proposals of the Ad Hoc Committee on a People's Europe for greater transparency in administration in the Community, and notably the proposal concerning the conclusion of an inter-institutional agreement to strengthen the citizens' right of petition, — having regard to Parliament's resolution of 14 June 1985 (3) in which it affirmed its will to strengthen the Citizen's right to petition the European Parliament and instructed the Com­ mittee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions to submit the necessary proposals,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (Doc. A2-74/86),

A. whereas, by providing for the right of petition in Rules 108-110 of its Rules of Procedure Parliament has established direct contact with individual citizens as well as public and private bodies active within the Community, thus strengthening its ties with civil society,

B. noting that the experience of past years shows that petitions are aimed particularly at: — redress of injustices suffered as a result of contravention of Community law or of Com­ munity interest, — obtaining, through Parliament's political action, the promotion, amendment or annul­ ment of initiatives and measures by the Community or the Member States within the sphere of Community interest,

(') OJ No C 103, 27. 4. 1977; Treaties 1978 edition p. 214. (2) OJ NoC77, 19.3. 1984, p. 27. (3) OJ No CI 75. 15. 7. 1985, p. 273. 10. 11. 86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/87

Thursday, 9 October 1986

C. whereas the steadily growing number of petitions addressed to the European Parliament is a measure of both its growing stature in the eyes of the public and of the effectiveness of this procedure in solving administrative and other problems with which Community citizens may be faced,

D. pointing out that the Community's legal acts are increasingly affecting the daily life of its citizens and that one of the fundamental rights of Community citizens is to contest the implementation of Community legal and administrative acts, both at Community and national level,

E. recognizing the Community's, and especially Parliament's direct interest in achieving trans­ parency of the Community system and in establishing in the Community a flexible and effective system for complaints against injustices and for investigation of any inefficiencies or limitations in Community activity,

F. stressing that the existing Treaties and the Single European Act already confer on the Com­ munity institutions extensive powers of investigation for the purpose of ascertaining whether Community objectives are being met, and that greater cooperation could usefully enhance the effectiveness of the existing petitions procedure,

G. convinced that such cooperation in this field can be achieved by means of more effective and rapid exchange of information between the European Parliament and the Commission as well as the public authorities of the Member States, not least through the intermediary of the Council,

1. Calls on the Commission to draw up by 1 June 1987 a proposal for effective and binding Community legislation to implement the decisions of the European Council referred to above and the suggestions contained in the European Parliament's resolutions concerning: — strengthening the right of citizens and other public and private bodies active in the Commu­ nity's territory to address petitions to Community institutions through the European Parlia­ ment; — the establishment of an appropriate information system allowing the European Parliament to obtain from other Community institutions as well as from the authorities of the Member States the information necessary for the examination of initiatives or measures which fall within its sphere of competence;

2. Declares its readiness to conclude an inter-institutional agreement which, while respecting the specific spheres of competence, will enable Parliament to investigate more effectively the petitions addressed to it;

3. Calls on the Council to guarantee the European Parliament cooperation from the authorities of the Member States, particularly as regards the exchange of information necessary for the examination of petitions, subject to any reservations of confidentiality which these administra­ tions may explicitly make;

4. Instructs its President to take the necessary steps to give effect to this resolution, which should be forwarded to the Commission, the Council, the Foreign Ministers meeting in Political Cooperation, and to the Presidents of the Parliaments of the Member States. No C 283/88 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11.86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

10. Directive imposing a standstill on VAT and excise duties

— Commission proposal COM(85) 606 final

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION TEXT AMENDED OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (*) BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Council directive imposing a standstill on VAT and excise duties

Preamble and recitals unchanged

Article 1 Article 1 Paragraph 1 unchanged 2. Without prejudice to the eventual decision to be 2.. Without prejudice to the eventual decision to be taken on the number of rates that may ultimately be taken on the number of rates that may ultimately be applied within the Community, applied within the Community, (a) Member States which apply more than three rates (a) Member States which apply more than three rates may reduce that number to three, may reduce that number; (b) Member States which apply a single rate may increase (b) Member States may change either to two or to three that number to two; rates;

Paragraph 3 unchanged 4. For the purposes of this directive the standard rate 4. Deleted. shall be either, (a) the single rate, in the case of Member States which apply one rate; or (b) the rate from which most value added tax revenue is obtained, in the case of Member States which apply several rates.

Articles 2 and 3 unchanged

(*) For full text see OJ No C 313, 4. 12. 1985, p. 5.

- Doc. A2-90/86

RESOLUTION closing the procedure for consultation of the European Parliament on the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council for a directive imposing a standstill on VAT and excise duties

The European Parliament, — having regard to the proposal from the Commission to the Council ('-), - having been consulted by the Council pursuant to Articles 99 and 100 of the EEC Treaty (Doc. C2-137/85),

(') OJ No C 313, 4. 12. 1985, p. 5. 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No G 283/89

Thursday, 9 October 1986

—having regard to its resolution of 17 November 1983 on the harmonization of taxation in the Community ('), — having regard to its resolution of 9 April 1984 on the need to implement the internal European market (2),

— having regard to its resolution of 13 June 1985 on consolidating the internal market (3),

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy (Doc. A2-90/86),

— having regard to the result of the votes on the Commission's proposal.

A. having regard to the conclusions of the meeting of the European Council on 28/29 June 1985 in Milan in which the Heads of State or Government, 'as regards the approximation of VAT and excise duties,... invited the Council of Ministers for Financial Affairs to examine on the basis of the White Paper any measures which might be necessary for the achievement of the objective of a single market and the possible timetable for the application of those meas­ ures',

B. endorsing the Commission's observations in Part III of the White Paper on completing the internal market (COM(85) 310 final), in which it is stated that fiscal checks feature promi­ nently among the functions carried out at the frontiers between the Community Member States and that, consequently, the removal of frontier controls is bound to have inescapable implications for the Member States as far as indirect taxes are concerned,

C. supporting fully and wholeheartedly the Commission in its efforts to implement by the end of 1992 the measures which — by virtue of the decisions taken at the meeting of the European Council on 2/3 December 1985 in Luxembourg that were followed up by the Member States' subsequent signing of the reform of the Treaties establishing the Community (the European Single Act) as agreed upon by the intergovernmental conference of Foreign Ministers — are designed to ensure the gradual establishment of the internal market — an area without internal frontiers and with freedom of movement for goods, individuals, services and capital in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty,

D. noting that abolition of fiscal frontiers will be a natural consequence of the other efforts being made to promote the development of the internal market, for example, through the removal of technical barriers to trade and national subsidies, but that the Community's endeavours to eliminate such barriers must in the first place be directed towards those areas that ensure optimum use and distribution of resources,

1. Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that the efforts so far to implement tax harmonization do not give grounds for optimism as far as the achievement of rapid results is concerned; calls therefore on the Commission, in accordance with the conclusions of the Milan summit, to give priority to the drawing up and continuing revision of the overall timetable for the implementation of measures with a view to the approximation of VAT rates and excise dutjes;

2. Emphasizes — see Parliament's aforementioned resolution of 17 November 1983 on the harmonization of taxation in the Community — that harmonization of taxes and excise duties must take place in accordance with an ordered programme of successive stages that takes into account the positive or negative financial, economic and social consequences for each Member State;

3. Agrees with the Commission that VAT and excise duties must be seen in the same context and that proposals must therefore cover both areas; believes therefore that in subsequent sub­ missions the Commission should avoid provisions that entail the exclusion of certain kinds of taxes, for example, excise duties on manufactured tobacco, alcoholic beverages and mineral oils — see Article 2(3) of the proposal which exempts these categories — from the current harmon­ ization measures, as the interrelationship between the various forms of taxation and the weighting by product areas is crucial in determining the consequences of harmonization;

(') OJ No C 342, 19. 12. 1983, p. 73. (2) OJ No C 127, 14. 5. 1984, p. 9. (3) OJ No C 175, 15. 7. 1985, p. 229. No C 283/90 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86 Thursday, 9 October 1986

4. Affirms that the effects of implementing the Commission's present proposal will vary decisively between the Member States and that the technical aspects (standard rate, mid-point, etc.) do not provide unambiguous and objective targets seen in relation to the systems of VAT and excise duty currently prevailing in the Member States;

5. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to present information on the consequences for Mem­ ber States of the different ways of calculating averages between the standard rates of VAT as well as on the possibilities of establishing convergence between the rates in Member States; recom­ mends that the Commission considers using the average which is applied to a particular supply of goods or services in the EC instead of the mid-point between the lowest and the highest standard rates;

6. Emphasizes that it would be unfortunate if harmonization were not to apply throughout the Community Member States; considers, therefore, any ideas about granting special status to Member States where the level of taxation differs markedly from that of the other States to be unacceptable;

7. Believes it is necessary in the case of excise duties to pursue structural harmonization in order thereby to obtain the transparency necessary to remove the risk of distortion; notes in this connection that, time and again, it has been felt appropriate - in response to the pressure of realities in individual sectors - to extend or postpone the time limits for moving on to a new stage simply because it has not been possible to reach agreement on the actual implementation of agreed fundamental decisions on the road towards harmonization;

8. Believes that the efforts to harmonize the rates of both value added tax and excise duties, including decisions on the number and level of such rates, may be pursued simultaneously with the coordination of the structure of excise duties that is in progress and the continuation of the ongoing harmonization of the basis of assessment;

9. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of the consequences for each individual country - see Parliament's resolution of 17 November 1983 - as account must necessarily be taken of the fact that the various elements in a country's economic policy, not least financial policy, in large measure exert varying influence on the distribution of income and wealth between an individual country's own citizens; draws attention to the fact that there are different traditions m the various Member States with regard to the distribution of the burden of taxation between direct and indirect taxation and other kinds of levels and that the level of taxation also differs to a certain extent, particularly for individual types of tax but also when taken as a whole;

10. Recommends to the national governments that they take the greatest possible account of the agreed objectives and scope for fiscal harmonization when adopting measures relating to tax matters, see Parliament's resolution of 15 April 1983 ('•) on the establishment of a prior informa­ tion and consultation procedure for tax matters; reiterates its support for the Commission's proposal establishing such a procedure, which would give the Member States an opportunity to draw attention to the adverse effects of measures adopted on the agreed objectives and the future propects for harmonization; urges the Council to proceed to adoption of the proposal without further delay;

11. Draws attention also to its resolution of 9 April 1984 on the need to implement the internal European market, paragraph 20 of which states that the purpose of the mutual information and consultation procedure is to ensure that the differences between the various Community coun­ tries, particularly neighbouring countries, do not become even greater;

12. Instructs its President to forward to the Council and Commission, as Parliament's opinion, the Commission's proposal as voted by Parliament and the corresponding resolution.

(') OJ No C 128, 16. 5. 1983, p. 103. 10. 11. 86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/91

Thursday, 9 October 1986

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

9 October 1986 ABENS, ADAMOU, VAN AERSSEN, AIGNER, ALBER, ALMEIDA MENDES, ALMI- RANTE, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTAS- SOPOULOS, D'ANCONA, ANDRE, ANDREWS, ANGLADE, ANTONIOZZI, ANTONY, ARBELOA MURU, ARIAS CANETE, ARNDT, AVGERINOS, BAGET BOZZO, BALFE, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARDONG, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BAR­ RETT, BARROS MOURA, BARZANTI, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BENCOMO MENDOZA, BERSANI, BESSE, BEUMER, BEYER DE RYKE, VON BIS­ MARCK, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOCKLET, BOESMANS, BOMBARD, BONACCINI, BONDE, BONINO, BOOT, BORGO, BOSERUP, BOUTOS, BRAUN-MOSER, BRITO APOL0- NIA, BROK, BROOKES, BUCHAN, BUENO VICENTE, BUTTAFUOCO, CAAMANO BER- NAL, CABANILLAS, GALLAS, CABRERA BAZAN, DE CAMARET, CANO PINTO, CANTA- RERO DEL CASTILLO, CAROSSINO, CASSABEL, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASTELLINA, CASTLE, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHI- NAUD, CHIUSANO, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, CHRISTODOULOU, CIANCA- GLINI, CICCIOMESSERE, CINCIARI RODANQ, CLINTON, COHEN, COIMBRA MAR­ TINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINOT, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COLUMBU, CONDESSO, CORNELISSEN, COSTANZO, COSTE-FLORET, COT, DE COURCY LING, CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CROUX, CRYER, DALY, DANKERT, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DELOROZOY, DE WINTER, DEBATISSE, DEPREZ, DEVEZE, DUARTE CENDAN, DUPUY, DURAN CORSANEGO, DURY, EBEL, ELLES J., ELLIOTT, EPHREMIDIS, ERCINI, ESTGEN, EWING, EYRAUD, FAITH, FAJARDIE, FANTI, FANTON A., FERNAN- DES, FICH, FITZGERALD, FITZSIMONS, FOCKE, FORD, FORMIGONI, FOURCANS, FRIEDRICH I., FRUH, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GALLUZZI, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GARCIA RAYA, GATTI, GAUCHER, GAUTHIER, GAUTIER, GAWRONSKI, GAZIS, GERONTOPOULOS, GIANNAKOU-KOUTSIKOU, GIAVAZZI, GIUM- MARRA, GLINNE, GOMES, GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF, GRAZIANI, GRIFFITHS, GRI- MALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUARRACI, GUERMEUR, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HABS- BURG, HACKEL, HANSCH, HARLIN, HAHN, HEINRICH, HERMAN, GARCIA ARIAS, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH, HOFFMANN K.-H., HOON, HUGHES, HUTTON, IODICE, IPPOLITO, IVERSEN, JACKSON F., JACKSON M., JEPSEN, KILBY, KLEPSCH, KLINKENBORG, KLOCKNER, KOLOKOTRONIS, KUIJPERS, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LALOR, LANGES, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LATAILLADE, LE CHEVALLIER, LEHIDEUX, LEMASS, LEMMER, LENTZ-CORNETTE, LENZ, LIENEMANN, LIGIOS, LIMA, LINKOHR, LIZIN, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LOMAS, LOO, LOUWES, LUCAS PIRES, LUIS PAZ, LUSTER, MAC SHARRY, MAFFRE-BAUGE, MAHER, MAIJ-WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MALAUD, DE LA MALENE, MALLET, MARCK, MARINARO, MARLEIX, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MARTIN S., MAVROS, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDEIROS FERREIRA, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MICHELINI, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MIZZAU, MONFORTE ARREGUI, MORRIS, MOTCHANE, MOUCHEL, MUHLEN, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSSO, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIEL­ SEN J. B., NIELSEN T., NORD, NORDMANN, NORMANTON, O'DONNELL, OLIVA GAR­ CIA, O'MALLEY, OPPENHEIM, D'ORMESSON, PAISLEY, PANNELLA, PAPAKYRIAZIS, PAPAPIETRO, PARODI, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PEGADO LIZ, PELIKAN, PEN- DERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERINAT ELIO, PERY, PETERS, PETRONIO, PEUS, PIERMONT, PIQUET, PISONI F., PISONI N., PLASKOVITIS, POETSCHKI, POETTERING, PONIATOWSKI, PONS GRAU, PORDEA, PRAG, PRANCHERE, PRICE, PROUT, PROVAN, QUIN, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RAGGIO, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, REMACLE, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROMEO, ROMEOS, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROMUALDI, ROSA, ROSSETTI, ROSSI T., ROTHE, ROTHLEY, ROUX, RUBERT DE VENTOS, SALZER, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHLEICHER, SCHMID, SCHON, SCHREIBER, SCHWALBA-HOTH, SEAL, SEEFELD, SEIBEL-EMMERLING, SELVA, SHER­ LOCK, SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMMONDS, SIMONS, SMITH, SPATH, SQUARCIALUPI, STAES, STARITA, STAVROU, STEVENSON, STEWART, STEWART- CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, SUTRA DE GERMA, TAYLOR, THAREAU, TOKSVIG, TOL- MAN, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TOUSSAINT, TRIPODI, TRIVELLI, TRUPIA, TURNER, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYS- SADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERGEER, VERGES, VERNIER, VERNIMMEN, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, VAN DER WAAL, WAGNER, WALTER, WAWRZIK, WEBER, WEDEKIND, WELSH, WEST, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, WOLFF, WOLTJER, WURTZ, ZAHORKA, ZARGES. No C 283/92 Official Journal of the European Communities 10,11.86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

ANNEX

Result of roll-call votes

( + ) - For ( —) = Against (O) = Abstention

Total and urgent debate

International summits — Amendment 1 replacing Doc. B 2-913/86

( + ) ABENS, D'ANCONA, ANDRE, ARNDT, BAGET BOZZO, BAILLOT, BANDRES MOLET, BARZANTI, BEAZLEY P. BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOESMANS, BOMBARD, BOOT, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CANO PINTO, CANTARERO DEL CASTILLO, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CASTELLINA, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHANTERIE, CHRISTODOULOU, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLLINOT, COSTANZO, COSTE-FLORET, COT, DE COURCY LING, CRESPO, CROUX, DALY, DUARTE CENDAN, DURAN CORSANEGO, ESTGEN, FOCKE, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, GATTI, GAUCHER, GRAZIANI, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, HABSBURG, HANSCH, HER­ MAN, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HOON, HUTTON, IPPOLITO, JACKSON M., JEP- SEN, KILBY, KOLOKOTRONIS, LATAILLADE, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LOUWES, LUIS PAZ, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, MAHER, MALLET, MARTIN D., MCMILLAN- SCOTT, MEDEIROS FERREIRA, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NEWENS, NIELSEN T., NORD, OLIVA GARCIA, PARODI, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PELI- KAN, PENDERS, PEREIRA M., PETERS, PISONI N., POETSCHKI, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PROUT, RABBETHGE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROSSETTI, ROSSI T., ROTHLEY, SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMONS, SMITH, SQUARCIALUPI, STEWART, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAYLOR, TOKSVIG, TONGUE, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYSSADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERBEEK, VERGEER, VIEHOFF, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WEDEKIND, WEST, VON WOGAU, WOLFF, ZAHORKA, ZARGES.

(O)

BARROS MOURA, BRITO APOLONIA, MIRANDA DA SILVA.

Human rights

Compromise amendment replacing Docs B 2-925,, 937, 939/86

( + )•

D'ANCONA, ARNDT, BANDRES MOLET, BARON CRESPO, BARROS MOURA, BAR­ ZANTI, BEAZLEY P. BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOESMANS, BOMBARD, BONACCINI, BRITO APOLONIA, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CANO PINTO, CASTEL­ LINA, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHRISTIANSEN, CINCIARI RODANO, DE COURCY LING, CRYER, DUARTE CENDAN, FERNANDES, FORD, GATTI, GLINNE, GRIFFITHS, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUARRACI, HANSCH, HEINRICH, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HIT- ZIGRATH, HOON, HUGHES, HUTTON, JACKSON M., JEPSEN, KLINKENBORG, KUIJ- PERS, LUIS PAZ, MARINARO, MARTIN D., MCGOWAN, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DA SILVA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, NEWENS, OLIVA GARCIA, OPPENHEIM, PEARCE, PELIKAN, PIERMONT, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PROUT, QUIN, RAMIREZ HERE- DIA, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROSSETTI, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SAN- CHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHINZEL, SCHWALBA- HOTH, SEIBEL-EMMERLING, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SMITH, TOKSVIG, TONGUE, 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/93

Thursday, 9 October 1986

TRUPIA, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VIE- HOFF, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAGNER, WURTZ.

(-) ALMEIDA MENDES, ANDRE, ANGLADE, BARDONG, BEAZLEY C. BEUMER, BROK, CABANILLAS, GALLAS, CLINTON, COLLINOT, CORNELISSEN, COSTE-FLORET, DALY, ESTGEN, GAUCHER, GAUTHIER, HAHN, HERMAN, LE PEN, LENTZ-CORNETTE, LENZ, MAHER, MALAUD, MALLET, MICHELINI, MUSSO, NIELSEN T., NORD, RAB- BETHGE, RAFTERY, SHERLOCK, SPATH, TZOUNIS, VERGEER, WEDEKIND, WIJSEN- BEEK, VON WOGAU, WOLFF, ZARGES.

Border controls

Resolution B 2-930/86

( + ) ALVAREZ DE PAZ, D'ANCONA, ARBELOA MURU, ARNDT, BAILLOT, BANDRES MOLET, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BARZANTI, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BONACCINI, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CAMPINOS, CANO PINTO, CASTLE, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHRISTIANSEN, COLOM I NAVAL, CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CRYER, DUARTE CENDAN, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HIT- ZIGRATH, HOON, JEPSEN, LUIS PAZ, MARINARO, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MORRIS, OLIVA GARCIA, PIERMONT, PONS GRAU, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROMEOS, ROTHLEY, SANCHEZ- CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHWALBA-HOTH, SEIBEL- EMMERLING, SIMONS, SMITH, SQUARCIALUPI, STEVENSON, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TRUPIA, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERDE I ALDEA, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VON DER VRING, WAGNER, WEBER.

(") ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANDRE, ANGLADE, BAT- TERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BEUMER, BOSERUP, BROK, CASSANMA- GNAGO CERRETTI, CHANTERIE, CLINTON, COLLINOT, CORNELISSEN, COSTE-FLO­ RET, DE COURCY LING, DALY, DE WINTER, DEVEZE, ELLES J., ESTGEN, FRUH, GAUCHER, GAUTHIER, GERONTOPOULOS, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HABSBURG, HACKEL, HAHN, HUTTON, JACKSON M., KILBY, LANGES, LE PEN, LENZ, MALLET, MARCK, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MUSSO, NORMANTON, D'ORMESSON, PASTY, PATTER­ SON, PEARCE, PEUS, PISONI F., POETTERING, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RAFTERY, ROUX, SCHON, SHERLOCK, SPATH, STEWART-CLARK, TAYLOR, TZOUNIS, WELSH, VON WOGAU, WOLFF.

(O)

BESSE, BOMBARD, BUENO VICENTE, COIMBRA MARTINS, COT, GADIOUX, MEDINA ORTEGA, PEGADO LIZ.

Nuclear safety

Resolution B 2-916/86

( + ) D'ANCONA, ARNDT, BANDRES MOLET, BARZANTI, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, CAMPI­ NOS, COIMBRA MARTINS, CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CRYER, DANKERT, DUARTE CEN­ DAN, FORD, GARCIA ARIAS, GRAZIANI, HARLIN, HEINRICH, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, MARINARO, MARTIN D., MCGOWAN, MORRIS, NEWENS, NEWMAN, PAN- NELLA, PETERS, PIERMONT, PONS GRAU, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROTHLEY, SCHWALBA-HOTH, SIMONS, SMITH, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, VAN HEMELDONCK, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WAGNER, WEBER, WOLTJER. No C 283/94 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

('-)•••

AIGNER, ALMIRANTE, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBE- LOA MURU, ARIAS CANETE, BARRAL AGESTA, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZ- LEY P. BEIROCO, BOMBARD, BORGO, BROK, BUENO VICENTE, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CANO PINTO, CANTARERO DEL CASTILLO, CLINTON, COSTE-FLO- RET, DE COURCY LING, DALY, DE WINTER, DEVEZE, DURAN CORSANEGO, EBEL, ELLES J., EYRAUD, FRUH, GARCIA AMIGO, GAUTHIER, GIANNAKOU-KOUTSIKOU, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HABSBURG, HUTTON, IPPOLITO, JACKSON F., JACKSON M., KILBY, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LATAILLADE, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, MAHER, MALLET, MARCK, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MIRANDA DE LAGE, MONFORTE ARREGUI, MUSSO, NAVARRO VELASCO, NEWTON DUNN, NORMANTON, PASTY, PATTERSON, PERINAT ELIO, PERY, PEUS, PISONI F., POETTERING, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHON, SHERLOCK, SPATH, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TAYLOR, TZOUNIS, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERDE I ALDEA, WELSH, VON WOGAU.

(O) WEDEKIND.

Drug abuse

Compromise amendment

( + ) ABENS, AIGNER, ALBER, ALMEIDA MENDES, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, D'ANCONA, ANTONIOZZI, ARBE- LOA MURU, ARNDT, AVGERINOS, BAILLOT, BALFE, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI BARDONG, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BARRETT, BARROS MOURA, BAR- ZANTI, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BENCOMO MENDOZA BEU- MER, BEYER DE RYKE, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOCKLET, BOESMANS, BOMBARD BONACCINI, BOOT, BORGO, BRAUN-MOSER, BRITO APOLONIA, BROK, BROOKES BUENO VICENTE, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CANO PINTO, CANTA­ RERO DEL CASTILLO, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTIANSEN, CHRISTODOULOU, CIANCAGLINI, CIN- CIARI RODANO, CLINTON, COHEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COL­ LINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COLUMBU, CONDESSO, CORNELISSEN, COSTANZO, COT, DE COURCY LING, CRESPO, CROUX, CRYER, DALY, DANKERT, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DE GUCHT, DE WINTER, DEBATISSE, DELOROZOY, DUARTE CENDAN DURAN CORSANEGO, EBEL, ELLIOTT, ERCINI, ESTGEN, EWING, EYRAUD, FAJAR- DIE, FITZGERALD, FOCKE, FORD, FORMIGONI, FOURCANS, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GATTI, GAUTIER, GAZIS, GERONTOPOU- LOS, GIANNAKOU-KOUTSIKOU, GIUMMARRA, GRAZIANI, GRIFFITHS, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, HABSBURG, HACKEL, HAHN, HEINRICH, HERMAN, VAN DEN HEU- VEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH, HOFF, HOFFMANN K.-H., HOON, HUTTON, IODICE JACKSON F., JACKSON M., JEPSEN, KILBY, KLEPSCH, KLINKENBORG, KOLOKOTRO- NIS, KUIJPERS, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LALOR, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LATAILLADE LEMASS, LEMMER, LENTZ-CORNETTE, LENZ, LIENEMANN, LIZIN, LLORCA VILA­ PLANA, LOMAS, LUCAS PIRES, LUIS PAZ, LUSTER, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, MAIJ- WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MALLET, MARINARO, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MAV- ROS, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY MIRANDA DA SILVA, MONFORTE ARREGUI, MOTCHANE, MUHLEN, MUNCH, MUN- TINGH, MUSSO, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., NORD, NORD- MANN, NORMANTON, O'DONNELL, O'MALLEY, OLIVA GARCIA, OPPENHEIM, PAIS­ LEY, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PELIKAN, PENDERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERINAT ELIO, PERY, PEUS, PISONI F., PLASKOVITIS, POETSCHKI, POETTERING PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, QUIN, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RAMIREZ HERE­ DIA, REMACLE, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSA, ROSSETTI, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHLEICHER, SCHON, SCHREIBER, SEAL, SEIBEL-EMMERLING, SHERLOCK, SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMONS, SMITH, SPATH, SQUARCIALUPI, STAES, STARITA, STE­ VENSON, STEWART, STEWART-CLARK, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, SUTRA DE GERMA, TAY- 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/95

Thursday, 9 October 1986

LOR, THAREAU, TOKSVIG, TOLMAN, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TOUSSAINT, TRUPIA, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAYS- SADE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERDE I ALDEA, VERGEER, VERGES, VERNIMMEN, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VON DER VRING, WALTER, WAWRZIK, WEBER, WELSH, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, WURTZ, ZARGES.

(-) FERNANDES, PANNELLA, PEGADO LIZ.

(O)

ALMIRANTE, BONDE, CRAWLEY, DURY, IPPOLITO, VERBEEK.

Immigration policy

Resolution B 2-881/86

( + ) AIGNER, ALBER, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, D'ANCONA, ANTONIOZZI, ARBELOA MURU, ARNDT, AVGERI- NOS, BALFE, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARDONG, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BARRETT, BARZANTI, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BEN- COMO MENDOZA, BEUMER, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOOKLET, BOESMANS, BOM­ BARD, BONACCINI, BOOT, BORGO, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, BUENO VICENTE, CAA- MANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CAMPINOS, CANO PINTO, CANTARERO DEL CASTILLO, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTIANSEN, CHRISTODOULOU, CIANCAGLINI, CINCIARI RODANO, CLINTON, COHEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLLINS, COLOM I NAVAL, COLUMBU, CONDESSO, CORNELISSEN, COSTANZO, DE COURCY LING, CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CROUX, CRYER, DANKERT, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DE GUCHT, DEBA- TISSE, DELOROZOY, DUARTE CENDAN, DUPUY, DURAN CORSANEGO, DURY, EBEL, ELLIOTT, ERCINI, ESTGEN, EWING, FAJARDIE, FERNANDES, FOCKE, FORD, FORMI- GONI, FOURCANS, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GATTI, GAUTIER, GAZIS, GERONTOPOULOS, GIUMMARRA, GOMES, GRAZIANI, GRIFFITHS, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HABSBURG, HACKEL, HAHN, HEINRICH, HERMAN, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH, HOFF, HOFFMANN K.-H., HOON, HUTTON, IODICE, JACKSON F., JEPSEN, KILBY, KLEPSCH, KLINKENBORG, KOLOKOTRONIS, KUIJPERS, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LALOR, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LEMMER, LENZ, LIENEMANN, LIZIN, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LOMAS, LUCAS PIRES, LUIS PAZ, LUSTER, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, MAHER, MAIJ- WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MALLET, MARINARO, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MAV- ROS, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MON- FORTE ARREGUI, MOTCHANE, MUHLEN, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, NEWENS, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., NORD, NORMANTON, O'DONNELL, O'MALLEY, OLIVA GARCIA, OPPENHEIM, PATTERSON, PEGADO LIZ, PENDERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERINAT ELIO, PERY, PEUS, PISONI F., POETSCHKI, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, QUIN, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, REMACLE, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSA, ROSSETTI, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SALZER, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ- CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHLEICHER, SCHON, SCHREI- BER, SEAL, SEIBEL-EMMERLING, SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMONS, SMITH, STAES, STARITA, STEVENSON, STEWART, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, SUTRA DE GERMA, THAREAU, TOKSVIG, TOLMAN, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TOUSSAINT, TRUPIA, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERGEER, VERNIMMEN, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WALTER, WAWRZIK, WEBER, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU, ZARGES.

(-) BROOKES, GUERMEUR, LATAILLADE, MUSSO, PASTY, PEARCE. No C 283/96 Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 11. 86

Thursday, 9 October 1986

(O) ALMIRANTE, BAILLOT, TAYLOR.

Resolution B 2-883/86

( + ) ADAMOU, AIGNER, ALBER, ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, D'ANCONA, ANTONIOZZI, ARBELOA MURU, ARNDT, AVGERINOS, BAILLOT, BALFE BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARDONG, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BAR.'- RETT, BARROS MOURA, BARZANTI, BEIROGO, BENCOMO MENDOZA, BEUMER BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOGKLET, BOESMANS, BOMBARD, BONACCINI BOOT BORGO, BOSERUP, BRAUN-MOSER, BRITO APOLONIA, BROK, BUENO VICENTE CAA- MANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CANO PINTO, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI CERVETTI, CHAMBEIRON, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTODOULOU, CIANCA- GLINI, CINCIARI RODANO, CLINTON, COHEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLLINS COLOM I NAVAL, CONDESSO, CORNELISSEN, COSTANZO, COSTE-FLORET COT CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CROUX, CRYER, DANKERT, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DUARTE CENDAN, DURY, EBEL, ELLIOTT, ERCINI, ESTGEN, EWING, EYRAUD, FAJARDIE FERNANDES, FOCKE, FORD, FORMIGONI, FOURCANS, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GARCIA' GARCIA ARIAS, GATTI, GAUTIER, GAZIS, GERONTOPOULOS, GIANNAKOU-KOUTSI- KOU, GIUMMARRA, GOMES, GRAZIANI, GRIFFITHS, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUI- MON UGARTECHEA, HACKEL, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH HOFF HOFFMANN K.-H,, HOON, IODICE, KLEPSCH, KLINKENBORG, KOLOKOTRONIS KUIJ- PERS, LALOR, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LEMASS, LEMMER, LIENEMANN, LIZIN LOMAS, LUCAS PIRES, LUIS PAZ, LUSTER, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, MAHER, MAIJ- WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MARINARO, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MAVROS MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MIRANDA DA SILVA MON- FORTE ARREGUI, MOTCHANE, MUHLEN, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, NEWENS, NEWMAN NIELSEN T., NORD, O'DONNELL, O'MALLEY, OLIVA GARCIA, PEGADO LIZ PEN- DERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERY, PEUS, PISONI F., PLASKOVITIS, POETSCHKI POETTERING, PONS GRAU, QUIN, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RAMIREZ HEREDIA REMACLE, RINSCHE, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROSA, ROSSETTI, ROTHE' ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNANDEZ SAPENA GRANELL, SCHLEICHER, SCHON, SCHREIBER, SEAL, SEIBEL-EMMERLING SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMONS, SMITH, STAES, STARITA, STEVENSON STEWART, SUTRA DE GERM A, THAREAU, TOLMAN, TOMLINSON, TONGUE TOP- MANN, TOUSSAINT, TRUPIA, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK VANDE- MEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERBEEK VERDE I ALDEA, VERGEER, VERGES, VERNIMMEN, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF VON DER VRING, WALTER, WAWRZIK, WEBER, WETTIG, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU WURTZ, ZARGES.

ALMEIDA MENDES, ALMIRANTE, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA BATTERSBY BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BROOKES, CANTARERO DEL CASTILLO DE COURCV LING, DALY, DEBATISSE, DURAN CORSANEGO, GARCIA AMIGO, HABSBURG HUT- TON, JACKSON F., JEPSEN, KILBY, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LATAILLADE, LLORCA VILA- PLANA, MALLET, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MUSSO, NEWTON DUNN NORMANTON OPPENHEIM, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PERINAT ELIO, PRAG, PROUT ROBLES PIQUER, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TOKSVIG.

(O) HAHN, HERMAN.

Vayssade report Doc. A 2-71/86—Position of Parliament in the context of action for annulment brought before the Court of Justice

Resolution as a whole

( + ) AIGNER, ALBER, ALMEIDA MENDES, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA ALVAREZ DE PAZ, AMARAL, ANASTASSOPOULOS, ANTONIOZZI, ARBELOA MURU, ARNDT, 10. 11.86 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 283/97

Thursday, 9 October 1986

AVGERINOS, BALFE, BANDRES MOLET, BANOTTI, BARDONG, BARON CRESPO, BAR- RAL AGESTA, BARRETT, BARZANTI, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY C. BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BENCOMO MENDOZA, BEUMER, BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ, BOCKLET, BOMBARD, BONACCINI, BOOT, BORGO, BOSERUP, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, BROOKES, BUENO VICENTE, CAAMANO BERNAL, CABRERA BAZAN, CAMPINOS, CANO PINTO, CANTA- RERO DEL CASTILLO, CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, CERVETTI, CHANTERIE, CHIAB- RANDO, CHRISTODOULOU, CIANCAGLINI, CINCIARI RODANO, CLINTON, COHEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLOM I NAVAL, CONDESSO, CORNE- LISSEN, COSTANZO, COT, DE COURCY LING, CRAWLEY, CRESPO, CROUX, CRYER, DALY, DANKERT, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DE GUCHT, DE WINTER, DEBATISSE, DELOROZOY, DUARTE CENDAN, DURAN CORSANEGO, DURY, EBEL, ELLIOTT, ERCINI, ESTGEN, EWING, EYRAUD, FAJARDIE, FERNANDES, FOCKE, FORD, FORMI- GONI, FOURCANS, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GARCIA, GARCIA AMIGO, GARCIA ARIAS, GATTI, GAUTIER, GAZIS, GERONTOPOULOS, GIANNAKOU-KOUTSIKOU, GIUM- MARRA, GOMES, GRAZIANI, GRIFFITHS, GRIMALDOS GRIMALDOS, GUERMEUR, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HACKEL, HAHN, HERMAN, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH, HOFF, HOFFMANN K.-H., HOON, HUTTON, IODICE, JACKSON F., JEP- SEN, KILBY, KLEPSCH, KLINKENBORG, KOLOKOTRONIS, KUIJPERS, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LALOR, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LEMASS, LEMMER, LENZ, LIENEMANN, LIZIN, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LOMAS, LUCAS PIRES, LUIS PAZ, LUSTER, NASCI- MENTO MADEIRA, MAIJ-WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MALLET, MARINARO, MARQUES MENDES, MARTIN D., MAVROS, MCGOWAN, MCMAHON, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MONFORTE ARREGUI, MOTCHANE, MUHLEN, MUNCH, MUNTINGH, MUSSO, NEWMAN, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., NORD, NORMANTON, O'DONNELL, O'MALLEY, OLIVA GARCIA, OPPENHEIM, PASTY, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PEGADO LIZ, PELIKAN, PENDERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERINAT ELIO, PERY, PEUS, PISONI F., POETSCHKI, POETTERING, PONS GRAU, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, QUIN, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, REMACLE, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROELANTS DU VIVIER, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSA, ROSSETTI, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ FERNAN­ DEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SCHLEICHER, SCHON, SCHREIBER, SEAL, SEIBEL-EMMER- LING, SIERRA BARDAJI, SILVA DOMINGOS, SIMONS, SMITH, STAES, STARITA, STE­ VENSON, STEWART, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, SUTRA DE GERMA, THAREAU, TOKSVIG, TOLMAN, TOMLINSON, TONGUE, TOPMANN, TOUSSAINT, TRUPIA, TZOUNIS, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VERGEER, VERNIMMEN, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WALTER, WAWRZIK, WEBER, WETTIG, WIJSEN- BEEK, VON WOGAU, ZARGES.

(-) ALMIRANTE.

Oppenheim report Doc. A 2-90/86 — Standstill on VA Tand excise duties

Resolution as a whole

( + ) AIGNER, ALMIRANTE, ALVAREZ DE EULATE PENARANDA, AMARAL, ANASTASSO- POULOS, ANTONIOZZI, BANOTTI, BARRETT, BARZANTI, BATTERSBY, BEAZLEY P. BEIROCO, BENCOMO MENDOZA, BEUMER, BOCKLET, BONACCINI, BOOT, BORGO, BRAUN-MOSER, BROK, DE CAMARET, CANTARERO DEL CASTILLO, CASSANMA­ GNAGO CERRETTI, CERVETTI, CHANTERIE, CHIABRANDO, CHRISTODOULOU, CIAN­ CAGLINI, CINCIARI RODANO, CLINTON, COLUMBU, CORNELISSEN, DE COURCY LING, CROUX, DALY, DE BACKER-VAN OCKEN, DE GUCHT, DE WINTER, DEBA­ TISSE, DELOROZOY, DURAN CORSANEGO, EBEL, ERCINI, ESTGEN, FORMIGONI, FOURCANS, GARCIA, GATTI, GAUTIER, GERONTOPOULOS, GRAZIANI, GUERMEUR, GUIMON UGARTECHEA, HABSBURG, HACKEL, HAHN, HERMAN, HUTTON, IODICE, KLEPSCH, KUIJPERS, LAFUENTE LOPEZ, LALOR, LARIVE-GROENENDAAL, LENZ, LLORCA VILAPLANA, LUCAS PIRES, LUSTER, MAHER, MAIJ-WEGGEN, MALANGRE, MALLET, MARINARO, MAVROS, MCMILLAN-SCOTT, MUHLEN, MUNCH, NEWTON DUNN, NIELSEN T., NORD, NORMANTON, O'DONNELL, O'MALLEY, D'ORMESSON, PATTERSON, PEARCE, PENDERS, PEREIRA M., PEREIRA V., PERINAT ELIO, PEUS, POETSCHKI, POETTERING, PRAG, PRICE, PROUT, RABBETHGE, RAFTERY, RINSCHE, ROBLES PIQUER, ROGALLA, ROMERA I ALCAZAR, ROSSETTI, SCHLEICHER, SCHON, 10.11.86 No C 283/98 Official Journal of the European Communities

Thursday, 9 October 1986

SCHREIBER, SHERLOCK, SPATH, STARITA, SUAREZ GONZALEZ, TOLMAN, TRUPIA, TZOUNIS, VANDEMEULEBROUCKE, VEGA Y ESCANDON, VERGEER, WAWRZIK, WEDEKIND, WIJSENBEEK, VON WOGAU.

(-) ALVAREZ DE PAZ, ARBELOA MURU, ARNDT, BAILLOT, BALFE, BARON CRESPO, BARRAL AGESTA, BOMBARD, BONDE, BOSERUP, BUENO VICENTE, CAAMANO BER- NAL CABRERA BAZAN, CAMPINOS, CANO PINTO, CHAMBEIRON, CHRISTENSEN, CHRISTIANSEN, COIMBRA MARTINS, COLINO SALAMANCA, COLOM I NAVAL, COT, CRAWLEY CRESPO, CRYER, DANKERT, DUARTE CENDAN, ELLIOTT, EYRAUD, FAJARDIE FORD, FUILLET, GADIOUX, GARCIA ARIAS, GAZIS, GRIFFITHS, GRIMAL- DOS GRIMALDOS, VAN DEN HEUVEL, HINDLEY, HITZIGRATH, HOFF, HOON, KLIN- KENBORG KOLOKOTRONIS, LUIS PAZ, NASCIMENTO MADEIRA, MARTIN D., MCGO- WAN MCMAHON, MEDINA ORTEGA, MEGAHY, MOTCHANE, MUNTINGH, NEWMAN, OLIVA GARCIA, PETERS, PONS GRAU, QUIN, RAMIREZ HEREDIA, ROELANTS DU VIVIER ROSA, ROTHE, ROTHLEY, SAKELLARIOU, SALISCH, SANCHEZ-CUENCA M., SANZ 'FERNANDEZ, SAPENA GRANELL, SEAL, SEEFELD, SEIBEL-EMMERLING, SIERRA BARDAJI, SIMONS, SMITH, STEVENSON, STEWART, TAYLOR, TOMLINSON, TONGUE TOPMANN, ULBURGHS, VAN HEMELDONCK, VAZQUEZ FOUZ, VERBEEK, VERDE I ALDEA, VIEHOFF, VISSER, VITTINGHOFF, VON DER VRING, WALTER, WEBER, WETTIG. (O) BROOKES, FOCKE, JEPSEN, OPPENHEIM, TOKSVIG.