Naima BOUGHAMOU, Farid DERBAL, and M. Hichem KARA*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences. -
Authorship, Availability and Validity of Fish Names Described By
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde Serie A [Biologie] Jahr/Year: 2008 Band/Volume: NS_1_A Autor(en)/Author(s): Fricke Ronald Artikel/Article: Authorship, availability and validity of fish names described by Peter (Pehr) Simon ForssSSkål and Johann ChrisStian FabricCiusS in the ‘Descriptiones animaliumÂ’ by CarsSten Nniebuhr in 1775 (Pisces) 1-76 Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 1: 1–76; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2008. 1 Authorship, availability and validity of fish names described by PETER (PEHR ) SIMON FOR ss KÅL and JOHANN CHRI S TIAN FABRI C IU S in the ‘Descriptiones animalium’ by CAR S TEN NIEBUHR in 1775 (Pisces) RONALD FRI C KE Abstract The work of PETER (PEHR ) SIMON FOR ss KÅL , which has greatly influenced Mediterranean, African and Indo-Pa- cific ichthyology, has been published posthumously by CAR S TEN NIEBUHR in 1775. FOR ss KÅL left small sheets with manuscript descriptions and names of various fish taxa, which were later compiled and edited by JOHANN CHRI S TIAN FABRI C IU S . Authorship, availability and validity of the fish names published by NIEBUHR (1775a) are examined and discussed in the present paper. Several subsequent authors used FOR ss KÅL ’s fish descriptions to interpret, redescribe or rename fish species. These include BROU ss ONET (1782), BONNATERRE (1788), GMELIN (1789), WALBAUM (1792), LA C E P ÈDE (1798–1803), BLO C H & SC HNEIDER (1801), GEO ff ROY SAINT -HILAIRE (1809, 1827), CUVIER (1819), RÜ pp ELL (1828–1830, 1835–1838), CUVIER & VALEN C IENNE S (1835), BLEEKER (1862), and KLUNZIN G ER (1871). -
Sperm Competition and Sex Change: a Comparative Analysis Across Fishes
ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00050.x SPERM COMPETITION AND SEX CHANGE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACROSS FISHES Philip P. Molloy,1,2,3 Nicholas B. Goodwin,1,4 Isabelle M. Cot ˆ e, ´ 3,5 John D. Reynolds,3,6 Matthew J. G. Gage1,7 1Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada 4E-mail: [email protected] 5E-mail: [email protected] 6E-mail: [email protected] 7E-mail: [email protected] Received October 2, 2006 Accepted October 26, 2006 Current theory to explain the adaptive significance of sex change over gonochorism predicts that female-first sex change could be adaptive when relative reproductive success increases at a faster rate with body size for males than for females. A faster rate of reproductive gain with body size can occur if larger males are more effective in controlling females and excluding competitors from fertilizations. The most simple consequence of this theoretical scenario, based on sexual allocation theory, is that natural breeding sex ratios are expected to be female biased in female-first sex changers, because average male fecundity will exceed that of females. A second prediction is that the intensity of sperm competition is expected to be lower in female-first sex-changing species because larger males should be able to more completely monopolize females and therefore reduce male–male competition during spawning. -
Reproductive Biology in Corkwing Wrasse (Symphodus Melops)
Reproductive biology in corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops) Maciej Karaszkiewicz Master Thesis Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES) Department of Biosciences Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO June 14th, 2020 II Reproductive biology in corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops) Maciej Karaszkiewicz III © Maciej Karaszkiewicz 2020 Reproductive biology in corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops) Maciej Karaszkewicz http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Acknowledgements The past two years have passed as fast as expected, it has been an amazing experience and something I am very proud of. Fishes has always been part of my life and working with them is nothing but fun. I remember taking breaks during my bachelor and watching the aquarium where there has been this amazing corkwing wrasse, who I was calling Muriel. Now I wrote whole thesis on that species. I kindly thank so much to my great two supervisors. Asbjørn Vøllestad thank you for letting me talk about my thousand ideas and fairy tales long from scientific way of thinking. Kim Halvorsen thank you for always helping me with answers to all my wrasse question, and there had been many and most of them not even relevant to this master thesis. I learned so much from both of you and hope you will look back at my work with a smile. Then I would also like to thank my family for great support and helping me to get where I am now. My father Tomasz, he would take me on fishing trips since my youngest years and my mom Dorota she has always said I can do it and told me to always go forward. -
Joan Roughgarden
EVOLUTION’S RAINBOW Evolution’s Rainbow Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People Joan Roughgarden UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2004 by Joan Roughgarden Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roughgarden, Joan. Evolution’s rainbow : diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people / Joan Roughgarden. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-24073-1 1. Biological diversity. 2. Sexual behavior in animals. 3. Gender identity. 4. Sexual orientation. I. Title. qh541.15.b56.r68 2004 305.3—dc22 2003024512 Manufactured in the United States of America 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 10987654 321 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48-1992(R 1997) (Per- manence of Paper). To my sisters on the street To my sisters everywhere To people everywhere Contents Introduction: Diversity Denied / 1 PART ONE ANIMAL RAINBOWS 1 Sex and Diversity / 13 2 Sex versus Gender / 22 3 Sex within Bodies / 30 4 Sex Roles / 43 5 Two-Gender Families / 49 6 Multiple-Gender Families / 75 7 Female Choice / 106 8 Same-Sex Sexuality / 127 9 The Theory of Evolution / 159 PART TWO HUMAN RAINBOWS 10 An Embryonic Narrative / 185 11 Sex Determination / 196 12 Sex Differences / 207 13 Gender Identity / 238 14 Sexual Orientation / 245 15 Psychological Perspectives / 262 16 Disease versus Diversity / 280 17 Genetic Engineering versus Diversity / 306 PART THREE CULTURAL RAINBOWS 18 Two-Spirits, Mahu, and Hijras / 329 19 Transgender in Historical Europe and the Middle East / 352 20 Sexual Relations in Antiquity / 367 21 Tomboi, Vestidas, and Guevedoche / 377 22 Trans Politics in the United States / 387 Appendix: Policy Recommendations / 401 Notes / 409 Index / 461 INTRODUCTION Diversity Denied On a hot, sunny day in June of 1997, I attended my first gay pride pa- rade, in San Francisco. -
Checklist of the Species of the Families Labridae and Scaridae: an Update
PARENTI & RANDALL Checklist of Labridae and Scaridae 29 Checklist of the species of the families Labridae and Scaridae: an update Paolo Parenti1 and John E. Randall2 1University of Milano–Bicocca, Department of Environmental Sciences, Piazza della Scienza, 1, 20126 Milano, Italy. Email: [email protected] 2Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817–2704, USA Email: [email protected] Recieved 7 July, accepted 1 October 2010 ABSTRACT. The checklist of the species of the RÉSUMÉ. Le répertoire des espèces des familles families Labridae and Scaridae is updated. des Labridae et des Scaridae est mis à jour. Après After the publication of the annotated checklist la publication du répertoire annoté (Parenti & (Parenti & Randall 2000) the species of Labridae Randall, 2000), les espèces Labridae ont augmenté increased from 453 to 504 and genera from 68 to 70, de 453 à 504 et les genres de 68 à 70, tandis que les whereas Scaridae increased from 88 to 99 species. Scaridae sont passées de 88 à 99 espèces. Altogether this account lists 53 species that are new Dans l’ensemble, ce comptage dénombre 53 espèces to science, while 14 species have been resurrected qui sont nouvelles à la science, tandis que 14 ont été from synonymy and 5 are now regarded as junior ressuscitées des synonymes et 5 sont actuellement synonyms. Comments on the status of 20 nominal considérées sous 5 nouveaux synonymes. Le species and notes on undescribed species are also répertoire comprend également des commentaires included. sur l’état de 20 espèces et des notes d’explication des espèces non encore décrites. -
Hunt for Palytoxins in a Wide Variety of Marine Organisms Harvested in 2010 on the French Mediterranean Coast
Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5425-5446; doi:10.3390/md13085425 OPEN ACCESS marine drugs ISSN 1660-3397 www.mdpi.com/journal/marinedrugs Article Hunt for Palytoxins in a Wide Variety of Marine Organisms Harvested in 2010 on the French Mediterranean Coast Ronel Biré 1,*, Sophie Trotereau 1, Rodolphe Lemée 2, Davide Oregioni 2, Christine Delpont 1, Sophie Krys 1 and Thierry Guérin 1 1 University of Paris-Est, ANSES, Maisons-Alfort Laboratory for Food Safety, Department of Chemical Contaminants in Food, Pesticides and Marine Biotoxins Unit, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94706 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (C.D.); [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (T.G.) 2 Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche sur mer, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche CNRS UMR 7093, 181 Chemin du Lazaret 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (D.O.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-1-49-77-27-22; Fax: +33-1-49-77-26-50. Academic Editor: Lucio G. Costa Received: 5 June 2015 / Accepted: 11 August 2015 / Published: 21 August 2015 Abstract: During the summer of 2010, 31 species including fish, echinoderms, gastropods, crustaceans, cephalopods and sponges were sampled in the Bay of Villefranche on the French Mediterranean coast and screened for the presence of PLTX-group toxins using the haemolytic assay. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for confirmatory purposes and to determine the toxin profile. -
(Planche XIII, 84) LABRIDAE Noms FAO: Fr
click for previous page 106 Poissons osseux LABRIDAE Labrus viridis Linnaeus, 1758 (Planche XIII, 84) Noms FAO: Fr - Labre vert; Es - Tordo; An - Green wrasse. Taille max.: jusqu’à 47 cm: commune de 15 à 35 cm. Méth. capt.: sennes de plage, dragues, filets maillants et palangres de fond, lignes à main, nasses et harpons. Habitat: espèce littorale, vivant dans les her- biers et autour des rochers, jusqu’à 50 m de profondeur. Noms locaux: Lappanella fasciata (Cocco, 1833) LABRIDAE Synonymes: Ctenolabrus iris Valenciennes, 1839. Noms FAO: Fr - Ctenolabre; Es - Doncel; An - Point-snouted goldsinny. Taille max.: jusqu’à 15 cm. Méth. capt.: sennes de plage, nasses, chaluts, filets maillants, lignes à main et palangres de fond. Habitat: plateau continental, au-dessus de fonds rocheux, de 100 à 200 m de profondeur. Noms locaux: Symphodus (Crenilabrus) bailloni (Valenciennes, 1831) LABRIDAE Noms FAO: Fr - Vieille: Es - Durdo; An - Brown- green head wrasse. Taille max.: jusqu’à 21 cm; commune de 15 à 18 cm. Méth. capt.: sennes de plage, nasses, chaluts, filets maillants, lignes à main et palangres de fond. Habitat: espèce littorale vivant dans les her- biers et autour des rochers, de 1 à 50 m de pro- fondeur. Noms locaux: Guide des familles et espèces 107 LABRIDAE Symphodus (Crenilabrus) cinereus (Bonnaterre, 1788) Synonymes: Crenilabrus griseus (Gmelin, 1789); Crenilabrus staitii Nordmann, 1840. Noms FAO: Fr - Crénilabre cendré; Es - Bodión; An - Grey wrasse. Taille max.: jusqu’à 16 cm; commune de 7 à 10 cm. Méth. capt.: sennes de plage, filets maillants de fond, dragues, nasses et lignes à main. Habitat: dans les eaux côtières jusqu’à 35 m de profondeur, dans les prairies sous-marines, parfois sur fonds meubles, souvent en es- tuaires au milieu de détritus et de végétation. -
PDF Download
A checklist of wrasses (Labridae) and parrotfishes (Scaridae) of the world: 2017 update PAOLO PARENTI Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy E-mail: [email protected] JOHN E. RANDALL Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817-2704, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The wrasse family Labridae sensu stricto contains 548 species at latest count at the end of 2017. The previous checklist by Parenti & Randall (2011) included 504 species: the additional species represent new discoveries (41 new species) plus resurrections from synonymy (6) minus species names synonymized (3). The total number of genera is maintained at 70 as two new genera have been erected (Sagittalarva Victor, Alfaro & Sorenson, 2013 for Pseudojuloides inornatus (Gilbert, 1890) and Novaculops Schultz, 1960, removed from synonymy with Xyrichtys Cuvier, 1814), and two genera have been synonymized: Nelabrichthys Russell, 1983 is a junior synonym of Suezichthys Smith, 1958 (Russell & Westneat 2013) and Xiphocheilus Bleeker, 1856 is now regarded as a subgenus of Choerodon Bleeker, 1847 (Gomon 2017). There are some discrepancies with the total number of labrid species (558) reported by the Catalog of Fishes by Eschmeyer et al. (2018) and they are discussed herein. Only one species of parrotfish (Scaridae) has been described as new since the last checklist in 2011. Key words: ichthyology, taxonomy, systematics, coral reef fishes, species list, catalog, Indo-Pacific Ocean. Citation: Parenti, P. & Randall, J.E. (2018) A checklist of wrasses (Labridae) and parrotfishes (Scaridae) of the world: 2017 update. Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation, 30, 11–27. -
Marine Ornamental Species from European Waters: a Valuable Overlooked Resource Or a Future Threat for the Conservation of Marine Ecosystems?
SCIENTIA MARINA 70 (3) September 2006, 389-398, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN: 0214-8358 Marine ornamental species from European waters: a valuable overlooked resource or a future threat for the conservation of marine ecosystems? RICARDO CALADO CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8000-117 Faro, Portugal. Templo Aquático, Rua de Santa Marta 27K, 1150-291 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY: The worldwide growth of the marine aquarium market has contributed to the degradation of coral reef ecosys- tems. Enforcing the legislation on importing ornamental species has led some European traders to concentrate on local species. Portugal is used as a case study of marine ornamental fish and invertebrate collection in European waters. One hun- dred and seventy two species occurring in Portuguese waters (mainland, the Azores and Madeira archipelagos) were con- sidered as potential targets for the marine aquarium industry, some of which are already traded on a regular basis (e.g. Clibanarius erythropus, Lysmata seticaudata, Cerithium vulgatum, Hinia reticulata and Ophioderma longicauda). To ensure appropriate management and conservation of these resources, the following options have been evaluated: banning the har- vest and trade of all marine ornamental species from European waters; creating sanctuaries and “no take zones”; issuing col- lection permits; creating certified wholesalers; implementing the use of suitable gear and collecting methods; setting mini- mum and maximum size limits; establishing species-based quotas; protecting rare, or “key stone” species and organisms with poor survivability in captivity; establishing closed seasons; culturing ornamental organisms; and creating an “eco-fee” to support research and management. Establishing this sustainable alternative fishery may help minimise the economical and social impacts caused by the crash of important food fisheries in Portugal and other European and West African countries. -
Macroecological Analysis of the Fish Fauna Inhabiting Cymodocea Nodosa Seagrass Meadows
Journal of Fish Biology (2015) 87, 1000–1018 doi:10.1111/jfb.12771, available online at wileyonlinelibrary.com Macroecological analysis of the fish fauna inhabiting Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows F. Espino*†, A. Brito‡, R. Haroun* and F. Tuya* *Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Campus de Tafira, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain and ‡Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Ecología Marina y Conservación, Unidad de Ciencias Marinas, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain (Received 16 May 2014, Accepted 21 July 2015) In this study, patterns in the taxonomic richness and composition of the fish fauna inhabiting Cymod- ocea nodosa seagrass meadows were described across their entire distribution range in the Mediter- ranean Sea and adjacent Atlantic Ocean. Specifically, the study tested whether there are differences in the composition of fish assemblages between those ecoregions encompassed by the distribution range of C. nodosa, and whether these differences in composition are connected with differences in biocli- matic affinities of the fish faunas. A literature review resulted in a total of 19 studies, containing 22fish assemblages at 18 locations. The ichthyofauna associated with C. nodosa seagrass meadows comprises 59 families and 188 species. The western Mediterranean (WM) Sea has the highest species richness (87 species). Fish assemblages from the Macaronesia–Canary Islands, the Sahelian Upwelling, South European Atlantic Shelf and the WM differ, in terms of assemblage composition, relative to other ecoregions. In contrast, the composition of the fish fauna from the central and eastern Mediterranean overlaps. -
Check List of Fishes of Georgia
Proceedings of the Institute of Zoology XXIII Tbilisi, 2008 163 _ 176 CHECK LIST OF FISHES OF GEORGIA N. Sh. Ninua¹, B. O. Japoshvili² ¹Georgian National Museum ² Institute of Zoology, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Investigations of the ichthyofauna of Georgia began in the XVIII-XIX centuries [10, 19,29- 31,33,41,43,44,60,64], but no faunistic lists of the fish species of the country have been published until now. The present ichthyofauna of Georgia comprises 167 species, belonging to 3 subgenera, 109 genera, 5 tribes, 9 subfamilies, 57 families, 13 suborders, 25 orders, 5 superorders, 2 subclasses, 3 classes and 2 superclasses. Among them 61 are freshwater inhabitants, 76 live in marine water and 30 species are migratory. Terminology follows modern systematic classification and the Global information system on fishes [7,71]. The following abbreviations are used: BS- Black Sea, BSB- Black Sea Basin, BSE- Black Sea everywhere, BSC– Black Sea Coast, BSCE- Black Sea coast everywhere, BSCC- Black Sea Coast of Caucasus, Riv.- river, Res. - reservoir, L.-lake. Key words: freshwater, marine, migratory fishes, Georgia Superclass Agnatha, Jawless fish Class Cephalaspidomorphi Order Petromyzontiformes, Lampreys Family Petromyzontidae Bonaparte, 1831, Lampreys Genus Caspiomyzon Berg, 1906, Caspian lampreys 1. Caspiomyzon wagneri (Kessler, 1870), Caspian lamprey Destribution: Before building the Mingechauri Reservoir was frequent. Today is rare [2,3,5,45,61]. Genus Eudontomyzon Regan, 1911, Brook lampreys 2. Eudontomyzon mariae (Berg, 1931), Ukrainian brook lamprey Destribution: Riv: Chorokhi, Chakvistskali, Chaisubani, Khobi, Tsivi, Enguri, Kodori, Kelasuri, Gumista, Bzipi [2,3,5,7,45,61]. Class Elasmobranchii Bonaparte, 1838, Rays and sharks Superorder Squalomorphi, Sharks Order Squaliformes Goodrich, 1909, Bramble, Sleeper and dogfish sharks Family Squalidae Blainville, 1816, Dogfishes, Dogfish sharks Genus Squalus Linnaeus, 1758, Spiny dogfishes, Spur dogs 3.