State of California Board of Corrections s4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State of California Board of Corrections s4

Board of State and Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

SECTION 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Grant Award Number: Grantee: (This is your current contract number)

Implementing Agency: Project Title: Prepared by: Phone: ( ) - Title:

Email: Date Submitted: Day-to-Day Contact: Email: Title:

Reporting Quarters Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 July-September 2012 October-December 2012 January-March 2013 April-June 2013

Specify Program Purpose Area(s) identified in your Application: Federal Grant Funds Awarded this year: $ Group(s) Served Group(s) Targeted Population Check all that apply Check all that apply Youth population not directly served (skip to Section 2) American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian & other Pacific Islander Other White/Caucasian First Time Offenders Repeat Offenders Sex Offenders Status Offenders Violent Offenders Male Female 11 & under 12-13 14-15 16-17 18 and over Rural Suburban Tribal Urban Mental Health Pregnant Substance Abuse Truant/Dropout

1 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

SECTION 2 FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Below are Core Performance measures that are required of all grantees funded with Juvenile Accountability Block Grant funds. Please provide data in all the fields below. Should your project be unable to provide the data requested, an explanation must be provided for all zero reported data fields.

Mandatory Core Performance Measures

1. Number and percent of programs/initiatives employing evidence-based practices A. Number of program/initiatives employing best practices 0 B. Number of programs/initiatives 0 C. Percent A/B 0 2. Number and percent of youth with whom an evidence-based practice was used A. Number of youth with whom a best practice is used 0 B. Number of youth 0 C. Percent A/B 0 3. Number of youth or youth and families served A. Number of program youth (or youth and families) carried over from the previous 0 reporting period, plus new admissions during the reporting period. 4. Number and percent of program youth completing program requirements A. Number of program youth who exited the program having completed program 0 requirements B. Number of youth who left the program 0 C. Percent A/B 5. Number and percent of program youth who offend during the reporting period A. Total number of program youth served 0 B. Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period 0 C. Of B, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense 0 during this reporting period D. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this 0 reporting period E. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting 0 period F. Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period 0 G. Percent OFFENDING (C/B)

2 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

6. Number and percent of program youth who offend during the reporting period A. Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are 0 tracking B. Of A, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense 0 during this reporting period C. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this 0 reporting period D. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting 0 period E. Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period 0 F. Percent of Long Term RECIDIVISM (B/A)

7. Number and percent of program youth who re-offend A. Total number of program youth served 0 B. Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period 0 C. Of B, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense 0 during this reporting period D. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this 0 reporting period E. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting 0 period F. Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period 0 G. Percent RECIDIVISM (C/B)

8. Number and percent of program youth who re-offend A. Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are 0 tracking B. Of A, the number of program youth who had a new arrest or delinquent offense 0 during this reporting period C. Number of program youth who were recommitted to a juvenile facility during this 0 reporting period D. Number of program youth who were sentenced to adult prison during this reporting 0 period E. Number of youth who received another sentence during this reporting period 0 F. Percent of Long Term RECIDIVISM (B/A) 9. Number and percent of program youth who are victimized A. Total number of program youth served 0 B. Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period for (re)victimization 0 C. Of B, the number of program youth who were (re)victimized 0 D. C/B

3 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

10. Number and percent of program youth who are victimized A. Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are 0 tracking for victimization B. Of A, the number of program youth who were victimized during this reporting 0 period C. Percent (b/a) 11. Number and percent of program youth who are re-victimized A. Total number of program youth served 0 B. Number of program youth tracked during this reporting period for re-victimization 0 C. Of B, the number of program youth who were re-victimized 0 D. C/B 12. Number and percent of program youth who are re victimized A. Number of program youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago that you are 0 tracking for re-victimization B. Of A, the number of program youth who were re-victimized during this reporting 0 period C. Percent (b/a) 13a. Antisocial behavior A. Number of program youth with the noted behavioral change during the reporting 0 period B. Number of youth in the program who received services for this behavior 0 C. Percent A/B 13b. Antisocial behavior A. Total number of youth who exited the program 6-12 months ago who had the 0 noted behavioral change B. Number of youth who exited the program 6-12 months earlier and received 0 services for this behavior C. Percent (A/B)

Zero Data - Explain all zero reported data:

4 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

Below are output and outcome measures that are required for your project’s program purpose area(s). Please provide data for all fields below. Should your project be unable to provide the data requested, an explanation must be provided for all zero reported data fields.

Program Purpose Area: 1 Graduated Sanctions Output Measure #19

1. Number and percent of youth who had a behavioral contract developed when they entered a program that was part of a graduated sanctions approach A. Number of youth with a behavioral contract developed when they entered the 0 program 0 B. Number of youth to enter the program 0 C. Percent (A/B)

Program Purpose Area: 1 Graduated Sanctions Outcome Measure #31

1. Number and percent of sanctions that were successfully contested A. Number of sanctions overturned 0 B. Number of sanctions applied 0 C. Percent (A/B) 0

Program Purpose Area: 8 Drug Courts Output Measure #211

1. Number of drug court slots A. Number of drug court slots 0

Program Purpose Area: 8 Outcome Measure #227

1. Number and percent of eligible youth enter the drug court A. Number of youth enrolled 0 B. Number of youth eligible 0 C. Percent (A/B) 0

Explain all zero reported data: (i.e. Project does not provide direct services to youth)

5 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

Additional measures collected: Please describe any additional data collected (as outputs or outcomes) for your project that may demonstrate program effectiveness but were not included in the above federal mandatory measurements.

SECTION 3 PROJECT STATUS

A. Goals and Progress – List project goals and the progress associated with each goal.

B. Evidence Based Practices – List the EBPs currently utilized in your JABG project. – How are these EBPs being evaluated to determine effectiveness? – What program outcomes have been achieved to date as a result of this evaluation?

C. Expenditure Status:

Federal Award Amount $ Amount Invoiced Year-to-Date (Sum of Quarterly $ Invoices) Percent of Award Invoiced to Date (Amount above ÷ % Annual Award) In relation to the expenditure status as identified above, are federal funds being expended as planned and on the schedule provided in your JABG application? Yes No If not, please explain why, and describe what expenditure plans exist for the duration of the grant period. Are matching funds being claimed as planned? If not, please explain why.

D. Staffing – Indicate whether all positions included in the application have been filled. If positions remain unfilled, what is the plan and anticipated outcome for staffing of the program? Are surplus funds anticipated due to salary savings, and what is the plan for these funds?

E. Problem Identification – Describe problems the project has encountered during the reporting period, if any, particularly those that may be affecting project effectiveness or have the potential for affecting program outcomes. Examples of areas where problems of this nature may exist are program administration, service delivery, rate of referrals and participant enrollment. Indicate the steps taken to resolve any problems mentioned.

F. Project Changes – Describe major changes or modifications that have taken place in the reporting period, if any. This should include budget, project management, service delivery, or changes to contact persons listed in the original application.

6 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

G. Proposed Changes – Describe any changes that are being proposed to improve the program within the next reporting period. (Note that some changes may require a formal Budget/Program Modification to be approved by your Field Representative.)

H. Activities – Describe any significant program activities anticipated in the next reporting period (i.e., award ceremonies, graduation ceremonies, media events).

SECTION 4 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

If you would like technical assistance, please identify the nature of the request:

SECTION 5 FINAL REPORT

Complete this section for the final reporting period only, in addition to all other sections of the Progress Report.

A. Discuss overall program effectiveness. Specifically, how have the problems identified in the application been addressed? What progress has been made in the program’s ability to promote juvenile accountability, and prevent or reduce juvenile crime in your community?

B. Describe collaboration efforts with other agencies throughout the grant period.

C. Describe efforts the project has made toward program sustainability beyond the grant period.

D. Describe recommended program modifications/improvements should the program be replicated or continued.

7 PR Revised 9/2012 Board of State Community Corrections Corrections Planning and Programs Division Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) - Direct Allocation Program 2012/2013 Quarterly Progress Report

E. Describe lessons learned from the program. `

F. What data, above and beyond the Federal Performance Measures, have been collected related to this project that support outcomes demonstrating program effectiveness? What are the successful outcomes?

Submit one copy of the report to your assigned Field Representative electronically or a hard copy to: Board of State and Community Corrections, 600 Bercut Drive, Sacramento, CA 95811

For BSCC Use Only Field Representative Reviewing Report: Date Reviewed: Comments:

8 PR Revised 9/2012

Recommended publications