New Product Evaluation Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Product Evaluation Survey

Instructions for using the 3M™ Tegaderm™ Transparent Dressing Evaluation Form

Purpose The purpose of these evaluation forms for Tegaderm™ transparent dressings is to assist your customer in the development of a tool to evaluate our dressing compared to their current or a competitive dressing for I.V. and/or wound care. The forms provide an extensive list of performance factors, features, and questions that can be modified based on the customer’s objective for conducting the dressing evaluation.

Pre-evaluation  During the development of the evaluation process, we encourage the 3M sales representative to ask if the evaluation coordinator would be willing to share the results (ratings and comments).  If you are assisting with the inservice to prepare the evaluators, request a copy of the I.V. or wound care policy or procedure (protocol) so you can incorporate their site preparation and dressing change intervals into your presentation.  If you are conducting the inservice on the dressing’s application/removal techniques for infusion therapy, use the 3M I.V. demonstration board and if possible, obtain the facility’s catheter(s) that will be the focus for the dressing evaluation. The Nursing Education Department personnel usually will provide you with the policy/procedure and the catheters.

Post-evaluation Feedback Upon the completion of the evaluation, please provide the Tegaderm™ Dressing Marketer with any or all the following information:  An electronic copy of the facility’s I.V. or wound care policy and procedure (protocol)  Current dressing they are using and any other competitive dressings being evaluated  What is the price to the facility for the competitive dressing? Was price a decision-factor?  Results (completed evaluation forms or written summary), if available.  What was/were the major factor(s) stated by the customer that affected their dressing selection? What major factor(s) do YOU believe affected their decision?  How would you modify the Tegaderm™ Transparent Dressing Evaluation Form? 3M Tegaderm Transparent Dressing Evaluation Form - I.V. Use Date: Name:

Facility: Department:

1. Check dressing evaluated:  Tegaderm™ Dressing Size or catalog number:______ Tegaderm™ HP Dressing Size or catalog number:______

2. How many Tegaderm evaluation dressings did you use during this evaluation?  1-2  3-5  > 5

3. Using the scale below, where “MW: equals much worse and “MB” equals much better, rate the performance of the Tegaderm evaluation dressing compared to your current I.V. dressing. Please add any additional information in the comment section.

Performance Factors Please Circle vs. Current Dressing Much Much Comments Worse Worse Same Better Better

a. Ease of Application MW W S B MB

b. Catheter Stability MW W S B MB

c. Seal Around Catheter MW W S B MB

d. Wear Time MW W S B MB

e. Site Visibility MW W S B MB

f. Patient Comfort MW W S B MB

g. Ease of Removal MW W S B MB

h. Overall Performance MW W S B MB

4. If evaluating the Tegaderm dressings with additional features, rate the value of the following feature(s):

Feature Please Circle Not Somewhat Highly Not Comments Valuable Valuable Valuable Valuable Applicable

a. Soft Cloth Border NV SV V HV NA

b. Reinforced Notch NV SV V HV NA

c. Sterile Tape Strips NV SV V HV NA 5. What did you LIKE about the Tegaderm transparent dressing?

6. What did you NOT LIKE about the Tegaderm transparent dressing?

7. Would you recommend the Tegaderm evaluation dressing to replace your current dressing?  Yes  No, because______

8. OPTIONAL: Check () the catheter type(s) and insertion site(s) used with the Tegaderm evaluation dressing:

Short-term Peripheral lines:  Peripheral, short  Peripheral, arterial

Central Lines: Short term Tunneled Implanted Swan Hemodialysis PICC CVC (triple Port Ganz/Pulmonary Site lumen, etc) Artery Catheter Internal Jugular Subclavian Antecubital Upper Arm

Please submit your completed evaluation to your Evaluation Coordinator. Thank you!

Recommended publications