DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of the Environmental Impact of Shooting Ranges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of the Environmental Impact of Shooting Ranges THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 4 | 2014 ENVIRONMEN- Best Available Techniques (BAT) ENVIRONMENTAL TAL PROTEC- PROTECTION Management of TION the Environmental Impact of Shooting Ranges Sara Kajander and Asko Parri (ed.) MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 4 | 2014 Best Available Techniques (BAT) Management of the Environmental Impact of Shooting Ranges Sara Kajander and Asko Parri (ed.) Helsinki 2014 MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 4 | 2014 Ministry of the Environment Layout: DTPage Oy Cover photos: Wide shot of a shooting range, Parolannummi shooting range: Janne Sikiö Shotgun shooter: Ari Niippa / Vastavalo.fi Construction of asphalt liner, Parolannummi shooting range: Ismo Salmela Frame of a firing line enclosure, Hoikankangas shooting range: Teemu Hourula The publication is also available on the Internet at: www.ym.fi/julkaisut Juvenes Print, 2014 ISBN 978-952-11-4351-9 (bound) ISBN 978-952-11-4352-6 (PDF) ISSN 1238-7312 (printed) 441 729 ISSN 1796-1637 (net) Painotuote FOREWORD The concept of Best Available Techniques (BAT) plays a very important role in the assessment of the requirement level of environmental protection during permit proceedings in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act. Shooting ranges are not covered by the scope of the Industrial Emissions Directive, so there is no joint European steering for the Best Available Techniques. Over the last years, a high-level national environmental protection guideline has been pre- pared by the so-called AMPY project involving, for example, the environmental administration. Regardless of this, both the shooting range operators and the representatives of the public ad- ministration saw fit to collect the technical and procedural solutions of environmental protection at shooting ranges and assess them in more detail. A BAT study can further improve the level of environmental protection, develop the cost-effectiveness of environmental protection at shooting ranges, harmonise the requirement levels of environmental permits, establish better means for taking case-specific conditions into account, and reduce unnecessary or incorrect investments. The BAT study for shooting ranges encountered the challenge that although a shooting range as a facility subject to the issuance of a permit would seem to be a reasonable simple structure, in reality, shooting ranges have been built for quite a large variety of purposes and numbers of users. Furthermore, the environmental conditions have a significant effect on the level of en- vironmental impact or risks caused by the shooting range. The study was different from most other national BAT studies in the sense that only a limited amount of domestic or international user experience is available for the various technical solutions for environmental protection at shooting ranges. Indeed, this resulting BAT report for shooting ranges places increased emphasis on emerging technologies and best practices related to operations. This should be taken into con- sideration when applying the contents of this report. The technical solutions compiled during the project have been piloted in practice during the preparation work, and structural design has improved further with experience. The national BAT report for shooting ranges was prepared in broad-based co-operation, the participants including representatives from several administrative branches, other users of shooting ranges, structural designers of shooting ranges, and experts in the management of environmental impacts. The project comprised two working groups (soil and water protection, and environmental noise) and a steering group. The working groups included representatives from permit and supervisory authorities from both the state and municipal administration, and the top experts in the field from the Finnish Environment Institute, the Finnish Defence Forces, the Construction Establishment of Defence Administration, shooting enthusiasts, and consult- ing firms. Preliminary studies were commissioned from the Aalto University, the University of Helsinki, and consulting firms. I would like to extend my warmest thanks to all parties who participated in the work of the steering group and the working groups and, in particular, the experts and authors of the preliminary studies who welcomed the challenge with open arms. Thank you to the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) for acting as the coordinating repre- sentative of the environmental administration and the party responsible for producing the publication. Support from the SYKE experts and the reviews required by the publishing process have allowed this report to achieve a high level of quality. Major thanks to the Finnish Defence Forces and the Ministry of Education and Culture for funding the project. I would like to give special thanks to Sara Kajander (Construction Establishment of Defence Administration), who directed the project execution, and Asko Parri (Army Command FInland), who was responsible for the section on environmental noise, for their countless working hours and in-depth delving into the subject. Matias Warsta Chair of the Project Steering Group The Finnish Environment 4 | 2014 3 CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................................................................................3 Abstract ...............................................................................................................................7 PART I – GENERAL .....................................................................................................13 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................15 2 Background, goals and limitations of the work ..........................................18 2.1 Background ......................................................................................................18 2.2 Goals and limitations .....................................................................................18 2.3 Instructions and plans produced as part of the project ...........................19 3 Applicable law ..........................................................................................................19 3.1 Acts and decrees applied in the environmental protection at shooting ranges ...........................................................................................19 3.2 Best Available Techniques (BAT) .................................................................21 3.3 Best Environmental Practice (BEP) ..............................................................22 PART II – POLLUTANTS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT .............................23 4 The impact of shooting range operations on the soil and the surface and groundwaters ...........................................................................25 4.1 Environmental contamination at shooting ranges ...................................25 4.2 Emissions of pollutants and their migration at pistol and rifle ranges ........................................................................................................27 4.3 Emissions of pollutants and their migration at shotgun ranges ............29 4.4 Migration of pollutants into groundwater .................................................30 4.5 Migration of pollutants into surface waters ..............................................33 5 Possibilities for the management and reduction of pollutant emissions ................................................................................................36 5.1 Pistol and rifle ranges .....................................................................................36 5.1.1 Reduction of pollutant load ................................................................36 5.1.2 Prevention of pollutant migration .....................................................52 5.1.3 Water management and treatment.....................................................56 5.2 Shotgun ranges ................................................................................................60 5.2.1 Reduction of the spreading area of pollutants .................................61 5.2.2 Prevention of pollutant migration .....................................................65 5.2.3 Water management and treatment.....................................................67 5.3 Methods being developed .............................................................................68 5.3.1 Reducing the solubility of the pollutants ..........................................68 5.3.2 Using substitute materials ...................................................................70 5.3.3 Water treatment by precipitation .......................................................74 5.3.4 Collecting the shot ................................................................................75 6 Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practice in the management of pollutant emissions .......................................................76 6.1 Planning the management of pollutant emissions ...................................76 6.1.1 Determining the acceptable emission level ......................................77 6.1.2 Planning of measures at a new range ................................................80 6.1.3 Planning of measures at an existing range .......................................80 6.2 Assessment criteria for the suitability of the techniques and practices.....................................................................................................81
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Environment Brought to You by CORE Provided by Helsingin Yliopiston445 Digitaalinen Arkisto the Finnish Eurowaternet
    445 View metadata, citation and similar papersThe at core.ac.uk Finnish Environment The Finnish Environment brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston445 digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Eurowaternet ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION Jorma Niemi, Pertti Heinonen, Sari Mitikka, Heidi Vuoristo, The Finnish Eurowaternet Olli-Pekka Pietiläinen, Markku Puupponen and Esa Rönkä (Eds.) with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies The Finnish Eurowaternet The European Environment Agency (EEA) has a political mandate from with information about Finnish water resources the EU Council of Ministers to deliver objective, reliable and comparable and monitoring strategies information on the environment at a European level. In 1998 EEA published Guidelines for the implementation of the EUROWATERNET monitoring network for inland waters. In every Member Country a monitoring network should be designed according to these Guidelines and put into operation. Together these national networks will form the EUROWATERNET monitoring network that will provide information on the quantity and quality of European inland waters. In the future they will be developed to meet the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. This publication presents the Finnish EUROWATERNET monitoring network put into operation from the first of January, 2000. It includes a total of 195 river sites, 253 lake sites and 74 hydrological baseline sites. Groundwater monitoring network will be developed later. In addition, information about Finnish water resources and current monitoring strategies is given. The publication is available in the internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe445/fe445.htm ISBN 952-11-0827-4 ISSN 1238-7312 EDITA Ltd. PL 800, 00043 EDITA Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Choose Your Style! in COOPERATION
    Choose your style! IN COOPERATION City of Oulu Kempele Municipality Muhos Municipality Ii Municipality Tyrnävä Municipality Liminka Municipality Lumijoki Municipality North Ostrobothnia ELY Centre Photography Valtteri Kantanen WE WANT TO MAKE CYCLING MORE VISIBLE! The main cycling routes in the Oulu region are made visible and distinct from regular cycleways. The main routes are waymarked and numbered, and signs with maps and distances between destinations are mounted along the routes. The slogan for cycling in the Oulu region is: Choose your style! This brochure gives information about the main cycling routes and the diversity of cycling in Oulu: it does not matter whether you sport a cruiser, mountain bike or a pink Jopo. You do not need special gear to cycle. Instead, you can cycle barefoot or with your boots on and with or without a helmet. The most important thing is that you cycle. New signs will be mounted along the main routes in 2019! Try the new routes and visit the sights nearby. Harri Vaarala Traffic engineer City of Oulu Cycling improves your physical condition and is an eco-friendly mode of transportation… But in the Oulu region cycling is something much more. In Oulu, all styles of cycling are allowed. You can exercise or you can cycle just for fun – there is no need to stress about proper gear or fancy bike models! Cycling is a natural part of the all-year- round lives of Oulu citizens. Choose your style and stay safe! MAIN CYCLING ROUTES People in the Oulu region cycle more than anywhere in Finland MAIN ROUTE 1 1 Oulu-Haukipudas 21 km The route starts at the Market Square and passes over the Tervaporvari bridges in the Oulujoki river delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Eljas Orrman
    FennoscandiQ archotologica VI/I (1991 ) ElJas Orrman GEOGRAPHICAL FACTORS IN THE SPREAD OF PERMANENT SETTLEMENT IN PARTS OF FINLAND AND SWEDEN FROM THE END OF THE IRON AGE TO THE BEGINNING OF MODERN TIMES Abstract The article discusses the role of ploughed soils in the spread of permanent settlement in Finland and in certain parts of Sweden. The author proceeds from the view that the extent of areas settled by agrarian communities was decisively conditioned by the way these communities were able to utilize the soils of the plough layer. In many cases the ineffectiveness of implements prevented the spread of settlement into areas where the soil was fertile but difficult to work . These areas could not be settled before the introduction of more effective types of _rds and ploughs. In Finland, the boundary of the Hame and Savo-Karelian cultural spheres may be explained by their different technologies for utilizing various types of soils. In Sweden, the old boundary of Swedish and Finnish culture in Vasterbotten also appears to correspond to the distribution of different soil types in the plough layer. Eljas OrrlTl4n, Department of History, University of Helsinki, Hallituskatu 15,00100 Helsinki Introduction settlement. An exception is a study by Eino Ju­ tikkala from 1933 , where the fertility of soils is Studies on the history of permanent post-iron seen as a significant factor in the spread of per­ Age agrarian settlement in the Finnish inland manent settlement in various parts of Finland at have not focused to any great degree on environ· the end of prehistoric times and in the Middle mental factors.
    [Show full text]
  • FINGRID O YJ Annual Report 2011
    FINGRID OYJ Annual Report 2011 Fingrid. Powering Finland. FINGRID OYJ, Arkadiankatu 23 B, P.O. Box 530, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 30 395 5000, fax +358 30 395 5196, www.fingrid.fi I41200550_Fingrid_Kannet_EN.indd 1 13.3.2012 17.34 Contents of annual report and reporting principles Fingrid draws up the consolidated financial statements and interim reports in accordance with the IFRS reporting standards accepted by the European Union and in accordance with the Finnish Se- curities Market Act. The annual review and the financial statements of the parent company of the Group are prepared in accordance with the Finnish Accounting Act as well as the guidelines and statements of the Finnish Accounting Standards Board. The information on personnel is based on the calculation systems used by human resource management, and the calculation of the rel- evant information is in compliance with the general guidelines of the Finnish Accounting Stand- ards Board concerning the preparation annual reviews. The environmental data is collected from the information reported to the authorities and from the company’s own data compilation systems. An external emissions trading verifier has verified our carbon dioxide emission report. In other re- spects, the corporate responsibility information has not been verified. Sustainability reporting covers the economic, social and environmental impacts of Fingrid Group’s own operations in 2011. We apply the international GRI G3.0 (Global Reporting Initiative) report- ing guidelines for the first time to our sustainability reporting. Moreover, we report selected indi- Graphic design and layout: cators stated in GRI’s Electric Utility Sector Supplement.
    [Show full text]
  • Lähtö N:O Emit Sarja Nimi Koulu Lähtöaika 35 107 3 Lk Pojat Pari RR
    Lähtö n:o Emit Sarja Nimi Koulu Lähtöaika 35 107 3 lk pojat pari RR Hannula Eeli ja Tyni Jouko Oulu/Kiiminkijoki 10:34:00 20 106 3 lk pojat pari RR Pietola Ville ja Kumpula Luukas Oulu/Kiiminkijoki 10:19:00 16 54 3 lk pojat pari RR Salmi Matti ja Tuusa Jaakko Muhos 10:15:00 17 81 3 lk pojat RR Aikioniemi Jaakko Kempele/Ylikylä 10:16:00 19 40474 3 lk pojat RR Jokinen Tuomas Oulu/Niemenranta 10:18:00 8 109 3 lk pojat RR Junnonaho Miikkael Oulu/Kiiminkijoki 10:07:00 26 138 3 lk pojat RR Kuukasjärvi Justus Oulunsalo/Kirkonkylä 10:25:00 31 190424 3 lk pojat RR Kuusikko Miska Raahe 10:30:00 15 166842 3 lk pojat RR Lohela Joona Oulu/Haukipudas 10:14:00 24 190997 3 lk pojat RR Marjala Verneri Oulu/Ritaharju 10:23:00 36 179832 3 lk pojat RR Miettunen Antti Ii/Olhava 10:35:00 38 159430 3 lk pojat RR Ronkainen Jami Oulu/Tervaväylä 10:37:00 last 3 108 3 lk pojat RR Sarkkinen Jasper Oulu/Kiiminkijoki 10:02:00 34 35 4 lk pojat pari RR Aalto Kalle ja Lehtomäki Markus Oulu/Kaukovainio 10:33:00 9 33 4 lk pojat pari RR Ahonen Eero ja Kenttälä Topias Oulu/Kaukovainio 10:08:00 6 34 4 lk pojat pari RR Bisi Saku ja Pyykkö Ville Oulu/Kaukovainio 10:05:00 12 36 4 lk pojat pari RR Hiltunen Leo ja Termonen Tomi Oulu/Kaukovainio 10:11:00 5 155 4 lk pojat pari RR Holappa Simo ja Saarela Lauri Lumijoki 10:04:00 4 124 4 lk pojat pari RR Kari Jere ja Laurila Mika Siikajoki 10:03:00 32 37 4 lk pojat pari RR Niemelä Juho ja Suorsa Jori Oulu/Kaukovainio 10:31:00 22 116 4 lk pojat pari RR Pitkänen Jaakko ja Laitinen Eetu Oulu/Kiiminkijoki 10:21:00 29 57 4 lk pojat pari
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Soundings at the Muhos Formation
    SEISMIC SOUNDINGS AT THE MUHOS FORMATION H. KORHONEN and M. T. PORKKA KORHONEN H. and PORKKA M. T. 1975: Seismic soundings at the Muhos formation. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland 47, 19—24. The Muhos formation near the city of Oulu in Finland consists of sedimentary rocks lying on the Precambrian bedrock. The thickness of this Jotnian forma- tion varies from a few tenth of meters to one kilometer. The formation is covered by Quaternary deposits. Seismic refraction surveys made at selected sites on the formation show velocities from 300 to 1 900 m/s for Quaternary deposits and from 4 700 to 5 800 m/s for the basement. In Jotnian sedimentary rocks the velocities vary from 2 000 to 4 100 m/s generally increasing with depth. At site Tupos, in the middle of the formation the refraction profiling, however, did not yield results from depths greater than 200—300 m. This is in disagreement with the well-velocity survey, which indicated higher velocities at greater depths. The contradiction might be explained by a low velocity layer situated near the top of the formation. The density determina- tions support this interpretation. H. Korhonen and M. T. Porkka, Department of Geophysics, University of Oulu, S F-90100 Oulu 10, Finland. Introduction silt, whose thickness is from a few meters up to 100 meters. Therefore its boundaries are not very After discovering the Muhos sediment forma- well known. More detailed studies, just in tion in 1938 (Brenner 1941) in the association of progress, will bring some changes to the map. site investigations for water power station Pyhä- The thickness of the Jotnian sedimentary rocks koski at Oulujoki river in Northern Finland, seems to vary considerably.
    [Show full text]
  • Pohjois-Pohjanmaan Palvelu- Kohteiden Maakunnallinen Opastussuunnitelma
    Kuusamo Ii Taivalkoski Yli-Ii Pudasjärvi Haukipudas Kiiminki Hailuoto Ylikiiminki OulunsaloOulu Kempele Lumijoki Utajärvi Liminka Muhos Tyrnävä Raahe Siikajoki Rantsila Pyhäjoki Vihanti Pohjois-Pohjanmaan palvelu- Merijärvi Kestilä Oulainen Pulkkila KalajokiAlavieska Haapavesi Piippola kohteiden maakunnallinen Ylivieska Pyhäntä Nivala Kärsämäki opastussuunnitelma Sievi Haapajärvi Reisjärvi Pyhäjärvi Pohjois-Pohjanmaan palvelu- kohteiden maakunnallinen opastussuunnitelma Tiehallinto Helsinki 2008 Pohjakartat: © Genimap Oy, Lupa L4356 ISBN 978-952-221-012-8 TIEH 1000172-08 Verkkojulkaisu pdf (www.tiehallinto.fi/julkaisut) ISBN 978-952-221-013-5 TIEH 1000172-v-08 Edita Prima Oy Helsinki 2008 Julkaisua saatavana: Tiehallinto, Oulun tiepiiri Telefaksi 0204 22 6884 TIEHALLINTO Oulun tiepiiri Veteraanikatu 5 PL 261 90101 Oulu Puhelinvaihde 0204 22 11 Pohjois-Pohjanmaan palvelukohteiden maakunnallinen opastussuunnitelma. Helsinki 2008. Oulun tiepiiri, 37 s. + liitteet 2 s. Asiasanat: viitoitus, aluesuunnittelu, liikenteen ohjaus, matkailukohteet Aiheluokka: 22 TIIVISTELMÄ Pohjois-Pohjanmaan palvelukohteiden maakunnallisessa opastussuunnitel- massa on kartoitettu nykyiset tärkeimmät tienkäyttäjien palvelukohteet. Ne on kerätty eri lausunnonantajilta saadun palautteen ja ohjausryhmätyösken- telyn kautta. Lausunnonantajia ovat olleet Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ympäristö- keskus, Metsähallitus, Oulun läänin taidetoimikunta, Museovirasto, Suomen leirintäalueyhdistys ja Suomen Matkailuorganisaatioiden yhdistys – SUOMA ry. Lisäksi kommentteja on pyydetty SF-Caravan
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Pohjois-Pohjanmaa
    Kulttuuria kartalla Taulukko 15.1. 15 Pohjois-Pohjanmaa POHJOIS-POHJANMAA Kuntien lukumäärä Kaupunkimaiset: 6 kpl Taajaan asutut: 9 kpl 15.1 Kuntatyypit ja Maaseutumaiset: 19 kpl kulttuuripalvelujen sijainti Yhteensä: 34 kpl Pohjois-Pohjanmaa on väkiluvultaan maan neljän- Väkiluku 395 922 neksi suurin ja kokonaispinta-alaltaan maan toiseksi suurin maakunta. Maakunta koostuu 34 kunnasta, Väestötiheys 11,2 as./km² joista kaupunkeja on 11. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan maa- Kokonaispinta-ala 44 088,4 km² kuntakeskus on Oulu. Valtionosuuslaitokset Valtionosuusmuseot: 4 kpl Pohjois-Pohjanmaan maakunnassa sijaitsee kolme (98 980,5 as./museo) kuntaa joissa ei ole tarjolla kartassa 15.1 tarkasteltavia Valtionosuusteatterit: 2 kpl kulttuuripalveluja. Pyhäntä, Siikajoki ja Utajärvi ovat (197 961 as./teatteri) kaikki tyypiltään maaseutumaisia kuntia. Valtionosuusorkesterit: 1 kpl Pohjois-Pohjanmaan valtionosuuslaitokset ovat kes- (395 922 as./orkesteri) kittyneet maakunnan kaupunkimaisista kunnista Ou- Valtionavustusta 13 kpl (30 455,5 as./ luun, jossa toimivat kaksi valtionosuusmuseota sekä saavat valtakunnalliset tapahtuma) maakunnan molemmat valtionosuusteatterit ja ainoa kulttuuritapahtumat valtionosuusorkesteri (Kartta 15.1). Valtionosuusmu- Taiteen perusopetuksen 22 kpl (17 996,5 as./ seoita toimii Oulun lisäksi kaupunkimaisessa Raahes- päätoimipisteet päätoimipiste) sa ja maaseutumaisessa Yli-Iissä. Valtionavustusta saavia kulttuuritapahtumia järjes- tetään niin kaupunkimaisissa (Oulu, Raahe, Oulun- Taiteen aluekeskukset 4 kpl salo), taajaan asutuissa
    [Show full text]
  • Liite 1 – Sivu 1
    POHJOIS-POHJANMAAN MAAKUNTAKAAVA Liite 1 – Sivu 1 LIITE 1 POHJOIS-POHJANMAAN KULTTUURIHISTORIALLISESTI MERKITTÄVÄT KOHTEET OULUNKAAREN SEUTUKUNTA Ii 10. Miettunen, Pohjoisranta (vrk 26) 1. Iin Hamina (vrk 9) 11. Kakko, Pohjoisranta (vrk 26) 2. Iin kirkko ja kotiseutumuseo, Hamina (vrk 9) 12. Suukosken mylly, Pohjoisranta (vrk 26) 3. Ellala, Hamina (vrk 9) 13. Yli-Kauppi ja Ala-Kauppi, Pohjoisranta (vrk 26) 4. Kirkkosaari (vrk 9) 14. Rajala (Kehus), Pohjoisranta (vrk 26) 5. Kruununsaari, entinen Satamasaari (vrk 9) 15. Entinen rautatieasema, Kuivaniemen Asemakylä 6. Illinsaari 16. Myllykankaan seisakkeen rakennukset (rakennukset siirretty) 7. Karhunsaari (vrk 9) 17. Vakkuri, Asemakylä 8. Veijola, Karhunsaari (vrk 9) 18. Mattila, Asemakylä 9. Entinen Kuokkalan pappila, Alaranta (vrk 9) 19. Patosaaren saha ja mylly, Kuivaniemen Asemakylä 10. Kestilän saha, Alaranta (Kestilän höyrysahan savupiippu, vrk, Museo- 20. Kattilankosken tervahaudat ja Korkiakangas viraston rakennushistorian julkaisu 18,1996) 21. Haltun kesänavetta ja aitta, Jokikylä 11. Pappila, Ii kk (vrk 9) 22. Koivuniemen asuinrakennukset, Koivuniemi 12. Iin työväentalo, Ii kk 23. Veskan asuinrakennus, Veska 13. Kauppilanmäen kansakoulu, Kauppila (yksi rakennuksista palanut) 24. Ahmonen 14. Pahkala (Kauppila), Kauppila 25. Oijärven säännöstelykanava, Krupula 15. Entinen suojeluskunnan talo, Kauppila 26. Seppälän tervahaudan pohja, Särkijärvi 16. Asemankylä (vrk 10) 27. Särkiahon navetta, Särkijärvi 17. Rautatieasema, Asemankylä (vrk 10) 28. Oijärven rantojen viljelysmaisema, Lalli 18. Yliranta (vrk 12) 29. Soivuoren mylly, Jokela, Oijärvi 19. Laurila, Yliranta 30. Honkakoski, Kivijoki 20. Pernu ja Käyrä, Pohjois-Ii 31. Harju, Leväjärvi, Oijärvi 21. Akolan kartano, Pohjois-Ii 22. Virkkula, Pohjois-Ii Valtakunnalliset kohteet (suluissa vrk-kohteen tunnusnumero): 23. Päkkilänkangas (vrk 11) Kirkonkylä (25) 24. Kuninkaan petäjä, Kuninkaanniemi Pohjoisrannan kylä (26) 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Oulun Seudun Ilmastostrategia
    OULUN SEUDUN ILMASTOSTRATEGIA Oulu, Hailuoto, Kempele, Kiiminki, Liminka, Lumijoki, Muhos, Oulunsalo ja Tyrnävä 2 OULUN SEUDUN ILMASTOSTRATEGIA OULUN SEUDUN ILMASTOSTRATEGIA Oulu, Hailuoto, Kempele, Kiiminki, Liminka, Lumijoki, Muhos, Oulunsalo ja Tyrnävä Hyväksytty Oulun kaupunginhallituksessa 19.5.2009 § 271 OULUN SEUDUN ILMASTOSTRATEGIA 3 Toimitus: Marketta Karhu Sivujen taitto ja paino: Oulun Konttori, Painatuskeskus, Soili Aalto-Hirvelä Kuvat: Kansikuva Matti Tynjälä, sivu 24 Maija Jokiharju, muut Markku Karhu 4 OULUN SEUDUN ILMASTOSTRATEGIA SISÄLLYSLUETTELO TIIVISTELMÄ ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 JOHDANTO .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 2 KANSAINVÄLISET, KANSALLISET JA PAIKALLISET SITOUMUKSET JA SOPIMUKSET ........................ 11 Kansainväliset ja kansalliset sitoumukset ja sopimukset ................................................................................ 12 Paikalliset sitoumukset ja sopimukset ................................................................................................................ 14 3 KASVIHUONEKAASUPÄÄSTÖT JA ENERGIANKULUTUS OULUN SEUDULLA ....................................... 17 Ilmastostrategian tarkastelualue ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ylijäämämaiden Sijoitusalueet Ja Alueiden Jälkikäyttö Uuden Oulun Alueella SISÄLLYSLUETTELO
    Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiohjelma Ylijäämämaiden sijoitusalueet ja alueiden jälkikäyttö uuden Oulun alueella SISÄLLYSLUETTELO YHTEENVETO 5 ESIPUHE 7 SANASTO JA LYHENTEET 8 1. JOHDANTO 10 1.1. Hankkeen lähtökohdat ja taustaa 10 1.2. Hankkeesta vastaava 11 2. HANKKEEN KUVAUS 12 2.1 Hankkeen yleiskuvaus 12 2.2 Hankkeen tavoitteet ja perustelut 12 2.3 Hankkeen liittyminen muihin hankkeisiin, suunnitelmiin ja ohjelmiin 12 2.4 Suunnittelutilanne ja toteutusaikataulu 13 3. NYKYISET SIJOITUSALUEET 14 4. TARKASTELTAVAT VAIHTOEHDOT 16 4.1 Vaihtoehtojen luominen 16 4.2 Vaihtoehdot 16 4.3 Muut tutkitut vaihtoehdot 19 5. YMPÄRISTÖVAIKUTUSTEN ARVIOINTIMENETTELY JA OSALLISTUMINEN 21 5.1 Arviointimenettelyn osapuolet 21 5.2 Arviointimenettelyn jatkuminen ja aikataulu 21 5.3 Osallistuminen ja vuorovaikutus 23 6. SIJOITUSALUEIDEN NYKYTILA 24 6.1 Runteli 24 6.2 Taatanperä 28 6.3 Vasikkasuo 30 6.4 Pyyryväissuo 32 6.5 Välimaa 34 6.6 Ellinmaa 36 6.7 Kaakkuri 39 6.8 Kalikkakangas 43 6.9 Oritkari 45 6.10 Pateniemi 48 6.11 Riita-aho 51 6.12 Väliräme 53 6.13 Letto 58 6.14 Palokangas 60 6.15 Korkiamaa 62 6.16 Leuvantie 64 7.ARVIOITAVAT VAIKUTUKSET JA ARVIOINTIMENETELMÄT 66 7.1 Arvioitavat vaikutukset 66 7.2 Ehdotus tarkasteltavan vaikutusalueen rajauksesta 66 7.3 Arvioinnin toteutus ja käytettävä aineisto 71 7.4 Vaikutukset luonnonympäristöön 71 7.5 Vaikutukset yhdyskuntarakenteeseen ja maisemaan 73 7.6 Vaikutukset ihmisiin 74 7.7 Yhteisvaikutukset muiden hankkeiden kanssa 75 7.8 Vaikutusten ajoittuminen 75 7.9 Vaihtoehtojen vertailuperiaatteet 75 8. EPÄVARMUUSTEKIJÄT, HAITALLISTEN VAIKUTUSTEN RAJOITTAMINEN JA SEURANTA 76 8.1 Epävarmuustekijät 76 8.2 Haitallisten vaikutusten rajoittamiskeinot 76 8.3 Vaikutusten seuranta 76 9.
    [Show full text]