International Arbitration Practice

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1 Chambers Global named King & Spalding one of the top international arbitration practices globally, quoting clients who say “Their understanding of the law ... is unparalleled.”

1 KING & SPALDING Global Leader in International Arbitration

King & Spalding’s international arbitration practice is Band 1 for consistently recognized as one of the leading practices in the International world in both commercial and investment arbitration—a reputation we have earned through creative strategic thinking, Arbitration meticulous preparation, effective advocacy and demonstrated CHAMBERS GLOBAL results. CHAMBERS USA CHAMBERS ASIA-PACIFIC Independent legal directories that rank law firms based on CHAMBERS LATIN AMERICA THE LEGAL 500 US client feedback, including Chambers, The Legal 500 and Global Arbitration Review, regularly report on our technical know-how, client responsiveness and results-oriented practice. International In the international commercial arbitration arena, we have Arbitration Practice Group represented clients in scores of corporate and contractual of the Year matters. In the investor-state arbitration arena, we have LAW360: 2017, 2018, 2019 handled more than 100 investment arbitrations involving a wide spectrum of legal issues and facts. Most Impressive In addition to acting in arbitration proceedings, we represent clients in courts around the world in arbitration-related International Arbitration litigation, such as motions to compel arbitration, anti-suit Practice Worldwide injunctions and enforcement actions. GLOBAL ARBITRATION REVIEW: 2019

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1 In-Depth Arbitration Knowledge

King & Spalding’s international arbitration practice is one of the most experienced and extensive in the world. We have a consistent track record of securing favorable results in complex, high-profile cases.

Our lawyers have successfully represented clients in commercial and WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT OUR ARBITRATION LAWYERS: investor-state disputes arising under contractual agreements and investment treaties across the Americas, Asia, Africa, Europe and the “truly extraordinary” Middle East. The team has deep experience handling disputes in the “one of the top arbitration energy, mining, construction, financial services, hospitality, lawyers in the world” manufacturing, media, intellectual property, pharmaceutical, “hugely respected and extremely transport and technology sectors. well regarded”

Many of King & Spalding’s arbitration lawyers are members of the “appears to effortlessly out- world’s leading arbitration institutions and are active within the lawyer his opposition” various international organizations that work to promote knowledge “unparalleled experience in and understanding of international arbitration, including the investor-State arbitration” International Bar Association, the International Council for Commercial Arbitration, the Institute for Transnational Arbitration, “incisive, imaginative and the International Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of prepared to be tough” International Arbitration and the International Law Association. “thought leader of the future”

King & Spalding lawyers regularly serve as arbitrators in both commercial and investment arbitration proceedings, and have EXCERPTED FROM CHAMBERS, THE LEGAL 500 AND WHO’S WHO LEGAL published books and scholarly articles on topics related to international arbitration.

2 KING & SPALDING Ranked top two globally (2019)

“ The firm’s rise up the rankings speaks volumes of the power of a winning record.”

GLOBAL ARBITRATION REVIEW

“ An esteemed practice with a reputation for representing high-profile clients.”

CHAMBERS LATIN AMERICA Extensive Global Reach

King & Spalding stands out among the world’s leading law firms as having a truly international arbitration practice with an established global footprint. With international arbitration lawyers in , Washington, D.C., , Austin, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Geneva, Moscow, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Singapore and Tokyo, our international arbitration practice has acted in proceedings involving projects or parties in some 140 countries across six continents. Afghanistan Côte d’Ivoire Indonesia Moldova Slovenia Algeria Croatia Iran Mongolia South Africa Angola Cyprus Iraq Morocco South Korea Argentina Czech Republic Ireland Netherlands Spain Armenia Denmark Isle of Man New Zealand Sri Lanka Australia Dominican Republic Israel Nigeria Sudan Austria Ecuador Italy Northern Ireland Sweden Azerbaijan Egypt Jamaica Norway Switzerland Bahamas El Salvador Japan Oman Taiwan Bahrain England Jersey (C.I.) Pakistan Tanzania Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Jordan Panama Thailand Belgium Eritrea Kazakhstan Papua New Guinea Trinidad and Benin Estonia Kuwait Peru Tobago Bermuda Ethiopia Laos Philippines Tunisia Bolivia Finland Latvia Poland Turkey Brazil France Lebanon Portugal Turkmenistan British Virgin Islands Gabon Lesotho United Arab Emirates Bulgaria Liberia Qatar Uganda Cambodia Germany Libya Romania Ukraine Cameroon Ghana Lithuania Russia Canada Greece Luxembourg Rwanda Uruguay Cayman Islands Grenada Madagascar Saudi Arabia Uzbekistan Chad Guatemala Malawi Scotland Venezuela Chile Guernsey (C.I.) Malaysia Senegal Vietnam China Hong Kong Maldives Serbia Wales Colombia Hungary Mauritania Singapore Yemen Costa Rica India Mexico Slovakia Zimbabwe

l Locations of the King & Spalding offices worldwide

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 5 Representative Experience

INVESTMENT TREATY CASES

Representing and Representing claimants in Teinver S.A. Transportes de Company in a US$9.5 billion UNCITRAL arbitration brought Cercanias S.A. and Autobuses Urbanos del Sur S.A. v. under the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty. The Argentine Republic, an ICSID arbitration brought under the dispute concerns the scope of environmental release Spain-Argentina bilateral investment treaty. The dispute agreements and due process violations by an Ecuadorian concerns the nationalization of two airlines. court in an environmental contamination trial brought by Ecuadorian plaintiffs. Representing claimant in 9REN Holding S. a. r. l. v. Kingdom of Spain, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Energy Representing claimant in Salini Impregilo S.p.A. v. Argentine Charter Treaty. The dispute concerns a renewable energy- Republic, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Italy-Argentina generation enterprise. bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns the construction and maintenance of a toll highway. Representing claimant in Union Fenosa Gas, S.A. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Representing claimant in CEF Energia BV v. ltalian Republic, Spain-Egypt bilateral investment treaty. The dispute an SCC arbitration brought under the Energy Charter Treaty. concerns the supply of natural gas. The dispute concerns photovoltaic and wind electricity-­ generating facilities. Representing claimants in an UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the Netherlands-Vietnam bilateral investment treaty. Representing claimant in Veolia Proprete v. Arab Republic of The dispute concerns the expropriation of real estate. Egypt, an ICSID arbitration brought under the France-Egypt bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns waste Representing South American Silver Limited in an UNCITRAL management services. arbitration brought under the U.K.-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a mining project. Representing Bear Creek Mining Corporation v. Republic of Peru, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Canada-Peru Free Representing claimants in loan Micula et al. v. Romania, an Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a mining project. ICSID arbitration brought under the Sweden-Romania bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerned a food Representing claimant in CEAC Holdings Limited v. Montenegro, products enterprise. an ICSID arbitration brought under the Cyprus-Serbia and Montenegro bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns an Representing claimants in Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati, aluminum production enterprise. Ascom Group S.A. and Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, an SCC arbitration brought under Representing claimant in Garanti Koza LLP v. Turkmenistan, an the Energy Charter Treaty. The dispute concerned the ICSID arbitration brought under the U.K.-Turkmenistan bilateral termination of our clients’ contracts and the seizure of their investment treaty. The dispute concerns the construction of interests in the Borankol and Tolkyn oil fields in Kazakhstan. highway bridges. Representing claimant in Fraport AG v. The Republic of the Representing claimant in Murphy Exploration and Production Philippines, an ICSID annulment proceeding, brought in respect Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, an UNCITRAL of an award rendered in a dispute concerning the construction arbitration brought under the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment of an airport terminal. The arbitration had been brought under treaty. The dispute concerns a concession agreement for the the Germany-Philippines bilateral investment treaty. exploration and exploitation of hydrocarbons.

6 KING & SPALDING “Impressive proposition” which “always gets really positive results.”

LEGAL 500 USA

COMMERCIAL CASES

Representing a dry bulk transportation company in two related Representing a mobile software and services company in an ad hoc arbitrations brought by a financial services company UNCITRAL arbitration against a hardware and software and a maritime company. The dispute concerns the purchase systems company. The dispute concerned a software of vessels. cross-­licensing agreement and IP infringement.

Representing an international voice and data Representing an East Asian company in a SIAC arbitration communications company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against an East Asian trading company. The dispute against a telecommunications company. The dispute concerned a consortium agreement relating to a metro concerns breach of contract. rail system.

Representing a hydrocarbons refining company in an ICC Representing independent oil companies as claimants in an arbitration against an EPC contractor. The dispute concerns costs UNCITRAL arbitration against a State-owned oil company. and delays in connection with the construction of a refinery in The dispute concerned the alleged breach of stabilization Latin America. provisions in a production-sharing contract and the collection of windfall profits tax. Representing a private equity sponsor in an LCIA arbitration against a European apparel manufacturer. The dispute Representing U.S. bondholders in a VIAC arbitration against a concerns the purchase of a line of clothing. Czech export bank. The dispute concerned bond claims.

Representing North American and Dutch oil majors in an ICC Representing an Indian conglomerate in an ICC arbitration arbitration against a South East Asian State. The dispute against a European hotel group. The dispute concerned a concerns the allocation of petroleum revenues. joint venture agreement for the development of hotels.

Representing a large energy company in an ICC arbitration Representing a European auto parts supplier in an ICC brought by an independent owner and operator of LNG arbitration against an auto manufacturer. The dispute carriers. The dispute concerns alleged damage to a vessel involved breach-of-warranty claims under the CISG. docked at an LNG facility. Representing a U.S. chemical company in a AAA arbitration Representing a major U.S. corporation in a SIAC arbitration against another U.S. chemical company. The dispute against a French company and French national. The dispute concerned a breach of a long-term supply agreement. concerned intellectual property rights relating to the design of restaurants. Representing the Government of Canada in LCIA arbitrations initiated by the United States under the 2006 Representing a group of 14 European insurance companies in an Softwood Lumber Agreement. ad hoc arbitration brought by a European telecommunications company. The dispute concerned the determination of the Representing claimant in an IACAC arbitration. The dispute purchase price for real estate under a call option exercised by concerned the delivery of feedstock to a petrochemical the telecommunications company. plant in Mexico.

Representing a major international aircraft manufacturer in an ICC Representing a Korean company in an ICC arbitration dispute against a vendor. The dispute concerned claims of delay, against a U.S. pharmaceutical company. The dispute disruption and the incurrence of substantial costs relating to the concerned a licensing agreement. design and implementation of various subsystems for corporate and private jet aircraft.

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 7 Representative Clients

Air Canada InterGlobe Enterprises Ascom Group S.A. Kosmos Energy Ltd AT&T KS Invest GmbH Bear Creek Mining Corporation Mahindra & Mahindra BOTAŞ Pipeline Corporation Marriott International Inc. Burlington Resources Inc. Murphy Oil Corporation Cavalum SGPS S.A. Noble Energy Chevron Corporation Northrop Grumman Corporation Clorox Spain Phillips 66 Company The Coca-Cola Company Refineria de Cartagena S.A. ConocoPhilips Company Reliance Industries Ltd Cube Infrastructure Fund SICAV Republic of Turkey Daewoo International Rockhopper Exploration plc The Dow Chemical Company Royal Dutch Shell plc El Paso Corporation Russian Machines OJSC Emirates Investment Company Sabre Oil and Gas Inc. EN+ Group Limited Salini Impregilo S.p.A. Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation Samsung C&T Corporation ESPF Beteiligungs GmbH Sempra Energy Euromar Commodities GmbH SN Aboitiz Power European Foods S.A. South American Silver Ltd Exterran Corporation SPI Group S.a.r.l. Corporation Teinver S.A. Fraport AG Tullow Oil plc Garanti Koza LLP Union Fenosa Gas S.A. The General Electric Company United Company Rusal PLC LP Veolia Propreté Halliburton Company VTB Bank (Austria) AG Hess Corporation Western Zagros Resources Ltd

In some jurisdictions, this may be considered “Attorney Advertising.” King & Spalding consists of King & Spalding LLP, a Georgia, U.S., limited liability entity, and affiliated limited liability entities in the U.S., England and Singapore.

8 KING & SPALDING “King & Spalding has built its name on results.” GLOBAL ARBITRATION REVIEW

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 9 ABU DHABI ATLANTA AUSTIN BRUSSELS CHARLOTTE CHICAGO DUBAI FRANKFURT GENEVA HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES MOSCOW NEW YORK NORTHERN PARIS RIYADH SAN FRANCISCO SILICON VALLEY SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C.

kslaw.com10 KING & SPALDING