Port Series 01 Port Series No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
16817.00 NHDOT PIN: PK 13678E Prepared by (Name/F
Project Name: ME-NH Connections Study FHWA No: PR-1681(700X) MaineDOT PIN: 16817.00 NHDOT PIN: PK 13678E Prepared by (Name/Firm): Lauren Meek, P.E., HNTB Contract Number: 20090325000000005165 Technical Memorandum No.: 3 - Navigational Needs of the Piscataqua River Date (month/year): August, 2009 Subject: Navigational Data for the Sarah Mildred Long and Portsmouth Memorial Bridges Background This Tech Memo is a supplement to a 2006 HNTB memo that identified issues and preferences for users of the Piscataqua River during the rehabilitation of the Portsmouth Memorial Bridge based on a mail-back navigational survey. This 2006 memo is attached as Appendix A. Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to: a.) summarize the existing horizontal and vertical clearances and identify the minimum required bridge lifts versus the actual number of bridge lifts of the Sarah Mildred Long and Portsmouth Memorial Bridges; b.) identify the users of the river; c.) analyze the bridge lift records; d.) summarize feedback from users of the river and those responsible for the river’s operation. Additionally, a survey to address the current and future uses has been sent to users of the river. A separate technical memorandum will be prepared with the analysis of the responses when received. 1 Methodology a. Existing Clearances and Frequency of Lifts Table 1 provides the clearances for the three lower Piscataqua River bridges as identified on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 13283, 20th Edition. The vertical clearance is the distance between mean high water and the underside of the bridge. The Portsmouth Memorial and Sarah Mildred Long Bridges have lift spans that provide additional vertical clearance when opened. -
In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
Case 19-11626-KG Doc 141 Filed 08/01/19 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) PES HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 19-11626 (KG) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) DECLARATION OF STEVEN N. SERAJEDDINI IN SUPPORT OF THE DEBTORS’ APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP AS ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION EFFECTIVE NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE I, Steven N. Serajeddini, being duly sworn, state the following under penalty of perjury: 1. I am a partner of the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP (“Kirkland”), located at 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022. I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and the Bar of the State of Illinois, and I have been admitted pro hac vice to practice in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. There are no disciplinary proceedings pending against me. 2. I submit this declaration (the “Declaration”) in support of the Debtors’ Application for Entry of an Order Authorizing the Retention and Employment of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis International LLP as Attorneys for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: PES Holdings, LLC (8157); North Yard GP, LLC (5458); North Yard Logistics, L.P. (5952); PES Administrative Services, LLC (3022); PES Energy Inc. -
Designation of Critical Habitat for the Gulf of Maine, New York Bight, And
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35701 the Act, including the factors identified Recovery and State Grants, Ecological Public hearings and public in this finding and explanation (see Services Program, U.S. Fish and information meetings: We will hold two Request for Information, above). Wildlife Service. public hearings and two public informational meetings on this proposed Conclusion Authority rule. We will hold a public On the basis of our evaluation of the The authority for these actions is the informational meeting from 2 to 4 p.m., information presented under section Endangered Species Act of 1973, as in Annapolis, Maryland on Wednesday, 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). July 13 (see ADDRESSES). A second determined that the petition to remove Dated: May 25, 2016. public informational meeting will be the golden-cheeked warbler from the Stephen Guertin, held from 3 to 5 p.m., in Portland, List of Endangered and Threatened Maine on Monday, July 18 (see Wildlife does not present substantial Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ADDRESSES). We will hold two public scientific or commercial information [FR Doc. 2016–13120 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] hearings, from 3 to 5 p.m. and 6 to 8 indicating that the requested action may p.m., in Gloucester, Massachusetts on BILLING CODE 4333–15–P be warranted. Therefore, we are not Thursday, July 21 (see ADDRESSES). initiating a status review for this ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, species. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE identified by the NOAA–NMFS–2015– We have further determined that the 0107, by either of the following petition to list the U.S. -
Official List of Public Waters
Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area). -
New Hampshire River Protection and Energy Development Project Final
..... ~ • ••. "'-" .... - , ... =-· : ·: .• .,,./.. ,.• •.... · .. ~=·: ·~ ·:·r:. · · :_ J · :- .. · .... - • N:·E·. ·w··. .· H: ·AM·.-·. "p• . ·s;. ~:H·1· ··RE.;·.· . ·,;<::)::_) •, ·~•.'.'."'~._;...... · ..., ' ...· . , ·....... ' · .. , -. ' .., .- .. ·.~ ···•: ':.,.." ·~,.· 1:·:,//:,:: ,::, ·: :;,:. .:. /~-':. ·,_. •-': }·; >: .. :. ' ::,· ;(:·:· '5: ,:: ·>"·.:'. :- .·.. :.. ·.·.···.•. '.1.. ·.•·.·. ·.··.:.:._.._ ·..:· _, .... · -RIVER~-PR.OT-E,CT.10-N--AND . ·,,:·_.. ·•.,·• -~-.-.. :. ·. .. :: :·: .. _.. .· ·<··~-,: :-:··•:;·: ::··· ._ _;· , . ·ENER(3Y~EVELOP~.ENT.PROJ~~T. 1 .. .. .. .. i 1·· . ·. _:_. ~- FINAL REPORT··. .. : .. \j . :.> ·;' .'·' ··.·.· ·/··,. /-. '.'_\:: ..:· ..:"i•;. ·.. :-·: :···0:. ·;, - ·:··•,. ·/\·· :" ::;:·.-:'. J .. ;, . · · .. · · . ·: . Prepared by ~ . · . .-~- '·· )/i<·.(:'. '.·}, •.. --··.<. :{ .--. :o_:··.:"' .\.• .-:;: ,· :;:· ·_.:; ·< ·.<. (i'·. ;.: \ i:) ·::' .::··::i.:•.>\ I ··· ·. ··: · ..:_ · · New England ·Rtvers Center · ·. ··· r "., .f.·. ~ ..... .. ' . ~ "' .. ,:·1· ,; : ._.i ..... ... ; . .. ~- .. ·· .. -,• ~- • . .. r·· . , . : . L L 'I L t. ': ... r ........ ·.· . ---- - ,, ·· ·.·NE New England Rivers Center · !RC 3Jo,Shet ·Boston.Massachusetts 02108 - 117. 742-4134 NEW HAMPSHIRE RIVER PRO'l'ECTION J\ND ENERGY !)EVELOPMENT PBOJECT . -· . .. .. .. .. ., ,· . ' ··- .. ... : . •• ••• \ ·* ... ' ,· FINAL. REPORT February 22, 1983 New·England.Rivers Center Staff: 'l'bomas B. Arnold Drew o·. Parkin f . ..... - - . • I -1- . TABLE OF CONTENTS. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS . ~ . • • . .. • .ii EXECUTIVE -
A Port City SNAPSHOT: WATERFRONT
POLICY GUIDE: WATERFRONT A Port City SNAPSHOT: WATERFRONT WITH OVER 350 YEARS as a center for shipping, services, passenger transportation, and recreational fishing, commerce, travel, and tourism, the Portland boating. Today, amidst flux and challenges, the waterfront offers a unique mix of heritage, ecology, City’s working waterfront is expanding. and innovation. Combining private and public piers Portland’s interwoven and adjacent marine-related in support of a full range of commercial marine and compatible non-marine uses provide a unique activities, Portland’s harbor boasts a working bridge between the City’s maritime activity and the waterfront in the heart of Maine’s largest city. commercial, tourist, and recreational city. Even so, The waterfront also provides public access and finding a balance between these sometimes invites tourism with dockside restaurants, historic competing, sometimes mutually beneficial, always architecture, harbor tours, and local and shifting waterfront environments is an ongoing international ferry service. challenge. The waterfront simultaneously faces This largely successful balance of disparate uses, issues associated with aging infrastructure, public coexisting next to and sometimes overlapping each access, development impacts, and climate change. other, is the product of decades of policy work on It is clear that investing in initiatives that both the part of residents, business leaders, marine directly and indirectly support the City’s historic, industry, and local officials. Portland’s waterfront marine-related industries while allowing the policies seek to preserve marine uses, but also waterfront to adapt to new and emerging provide for a balance of non-marine uses which allow marine-related industries and emerging water- the waterfront to adapt to changing economic dependent uses is the path toward a sustainable, trends and evolving infrastructure needs, as healthy waterfront in the future. -
1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites
1982 Maine River's Study Appendix H - Rivers with Historical Landmarks & Register Sites HISTORI RIVER NAME HISTORIC SITE/PLACE C COUNTY LOCATION LINK Androscoggin River Pejepscot Paper Mill RHP Sagadahoc Topsham https://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/201/page/460/display Androscoggin River Barker Mill RHP Androscoggin Auburn https://tinyurl.com/y8wsy2a6 Bagaduce River Fort George RHP Hancock Castine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_George_(Castine,_Maine) Carrabasset River (Lemon Stream) New Portland Wire Bridge RHP Somerset New Portland http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/otherbridges/wirebridge/index.shtml Damariscotta Oyster Shell Heaps (Whaleback) Damariscotta River RHP Lincoln Damariscotta http://tinyurl.com/m9vgk84 Kennebec Franklin Dead River Dead River Arnold Trail to Quebec RHP Somerset Chain of Ponds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Arnold%27s_expedition_to_Quebec Ellis River Lovejoy Bridge RHP Oxford South Andover http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/lovejoybridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Robyville Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://www.maine.gov/mdot/historicbridges/coveredbridges/robyvillebridge/ Kenduskeag Stream Morse Bridge RHP Penobscot Bangor http://bangorinfo.com/Focus/focus_kenduskeag_stream.html Kennebec River Fort Baldwin RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.maine.gov/cgi-bin/online/doc/parksearch/details.pl?park_id=86 Kennebec River Fort Popham RHP Sagadahoc Popham Beach http://www.fortwiki.com/Fort_Popham Percy and Small Shipyard Kennebec River Maritime Museum District* RHP Sagadahoc -
The Cocheco River
WD-R&L-23 2019 The Cocheco River The Cocheco River is part of the Piscataqua River drainage basin, flowing near New Hampshire’s boundary with Maine. The Cocheco River watershed’s 175 square miles is entirely within New Hampshire. Headwater streams arise in Milton, Farmington, Middleton and New Durham. The river flows approximately 34.8 miles in a southeastern direction from New Durham, descending to the Cocheco River valley in Farmington. From Farmington to Rochester, it flows as a small river in a forested river corridor. In Rochester the river emerges from the backyards of residential neighborhoods into the urban center of downtown Rochester before becoming tidal in Dover, where it joins with the Salmon Falls River to form the Piscataqua River. The Cocheco River was designated into the New Hampshire Rivers Management and Protection Program in 2009. Land use in the river corridor is a complex mix of rural development, forests, wetlands and heavily-settled urban areas. Rapid suburbanization is decreasing the area of open lands in the middle and lower portions of the sub-watershed. In the lower Cocheco River reach, there is rapid growth in formerly rural areas of Dover, Somersworth and Rochester. Geology The formation of the Cocheco River began about 18,000 years ago, as the last glacier moved its way across New Hampshire. The glacial activity played a major role in influencing the landscape and characteristics of the Cocheco River watershed. Nearly 20% of the watershed is overlain by stratified-drift aquifers, and about 10% of these aquifers are considered to be potentially high-yielding water sources. -
Portland Daily Press: January 26, 1897
PORTLAND DAILY JANUARY 1897. ESTABLISHED JUNE 23. 1862—YOL. 34. PORTLAND, MAINE, TUESDAY MORNING. 2«, him on I 1 and useless for me to iuteiview temperature today was thirteen below LEGISLATIVE NOTICES. refused the ITS DATS NllBEIilD. throughout southern Illinois end western SPEAKER AS REFEREE. the subject, and I was COLD WAVE Of IMPARTIAL. Tennessee. The weather was the coldest privilege of seeing the President. A Public Hearing of the season. course the Republican members laughed Had To Go To Bed To Warm* which Keep at him a little for the experiences Fremont, O., January 85.—The ther- he had had with the President of his own mometer fourteen below this the atti- Cuban Insurrection Can Last Cut registered Mr. Reed Decides party; but they all considered All Sections of morning. The natursl gas gave Parliamentary The Conntry Favored supply tude of Mr. Cleveland remarkable. out temporarily and many people were a difficult thing for a Little Longer. obliged to go to bed to keep warm. Law Disputes. truth is, it is quite Alike. to see the Presi- Temperatures Reported In Detroit. member of Congress dent. They oan get as far as the-private Detroit, January 25.—At eight this and that is all. This condition morning the mercury stood at 15.2 below secretary, DESPATCHES FBOM __ so; SAY TWO and at noon it had not risen much. ASKED TO DECIDE FOR of affnirs is rather unprecedented, if not STATE OF MAINE. 1 DROP IN QUESTIONS TEMPERATURE IN MIS- reports 14 Alpena, 5; has caused not a Or Reekesbntatives. -
A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire New Hampshire Estuaries Project
AR-293 University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository PREP Publications Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership 2000 A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire New Hampshire Estuaries Project Stephen H. Jones University of New Hampshire Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.unh.edu/prep Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation New Hampshire Estuaries Project and Jones, Stephen H., "A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire" (2000). PREP Publications. Paper 294. http://scholars.unh.edu/prep/294 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Piscataqua Region Estuaries Partnership at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in PREP Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Technical Characterization of Estuarine and Coastal New Hampshire Published by the New Hampshire Estuaries Project Edited by Dr. Stephen H. Jones Jackson estuarine Laboratory, university of New Hampshire Durham, NH 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................................viii -
International Arbitration Practice
International Arbitration Practice INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1 Chambers Global named King & Spalding one of the top international arbitration practices globally, quoting clients who say “Their understanding of the law ... is unparalleled.” 1 KING & SPALDING Global Leader in International Arbitration King & Spalding’s international arbitration practice is Band 1 for consistently recognized as one of the leading practices in the International world in both commercial and investment arbitration—a reputation we have earned through creative strategic thinking, Arbitration meticulous preparation, effective advocacy and demonstrated CHAMBERS GLOBAL results. CHAMBERS USA CHAMBERS ASIA-PACIFIC Independent legal directories that rank law firms based on CHAMBERS LATIN AMERICA THE LEGAL 500 US client feedback, including Chambers, The Legal 500 and Global Arbitration Review, regularly report on our technical know-how, client responsiveness and results-oriented practice. International In the international commercial arbitration arena, we have Arbitration Practice Group represented clients in scores of corporate and contractual of the Year matters. In the investor-state arbitration arena, we have LAW360: 2017, 2018, 2019 handled more than 100 investment arbitrations involving a wide spectrum of legal issues and facts. Most Impressive In addition to acting in arbitration proceedings, we represent clients in courts around the world in arbitration-related International Arbitration litigation, such as motions to compel arbitration, anti-suit Practice Worldwide injunctions and enforcement actions. GLOBAL ARBITRATION REVIEW: 2019 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1 In-Depth Arbitration Knowledge King & Spalding’s international arbitration practice is one of the most experienced and extensive in the world. We have a consistent track record of securing favorable results in complex, high-profile cases. -
Oil & Gas Report Q1 2017
50 45 40 Financial 43 35 8% 30 25 20 15 10 13 5 12 11 1 Strategic - 92% Midstream Oil & Refining & Equipment & Exploration & Integrated Oil & Gas Marketing Services Production Gas Amount TEV/ TEV/ Date Target Buyer(s) Segment ($ in Mil) Rev EBITDA 1/17/2017 Bass (Permian Basin Oil Fields) XTO Energy, Inc.; Exxon Mobil Corp. Exploration & Production $6,600.00 - - 1/25/2017 WGL Holdings, Inc. AltaGas Ltd. Refining & Marketing 6,584.28 2.73x 15.16x 1/4/2017 DCP Midstream LLC DCP Midsteam Partners LP Integrated Oil & Gas 3,816.27 0.55x 8.00x 3/6/2017 Motiva Enterprises LLC Government of Saudi Arabia; Saudi Refining & Marketing 2,900.00 - - Refining, Inc. 2/7/2017 Double Eagle Energy Permian Operating LLC Parsley Energy LLC Exploration & Production 2,740.32 - - 1/16/2017 Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. (Delaware) Noble Energy, Inc. Exploration & Production 2,671.61 16.09x 43.13x 1/12/2017 Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (Western Eagle Ford Sanchez Energy Corp.; Blackstone Exploration & Production 2,300.00 - - Assets) Corporate Private Equity; The Blackstone 3/1/2017 Marathon Petroleum Corp. (3 Subsidiaries) MPLXGroup LPLP; Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Midstream Oil & Gas 2,015.00 - - 1/27/2017 Midcoast Energy Partners LP Enbridge Energy Co., Inc. Refining & Marketing 936.88 0.48x 16.21x Strategic Buyer Inv. Date Select Corporate Acquisitions Parsley Energy LLC 2/7/2017 ▪ Double Eagle Energy Permian Operating LLC (Subs (3)) 8/15/2016 ▪ Undeveloped Acreage And Producing Oil And Gas Properties In Glasscock County 5/23/2016 ▪ 30,000 Acres Mineral Rights In Pecos And Reeves Counties 5/23/2016 ▪ 885 Net Acres in Pecos and Reeves Counties 4/4/2016 ▪ Riverbend Permian, LLC (8,800 Gross Acres) Ferrellgas Partners LP 3/15/2017 ▪ Valley Center Propane 12/18/2015 ▪ Gasco Energy Supply, LLC 6/1/2015 ▪ Bridger Logistics, LLC 7/1/2014 ▪ Wise Choice Propane, LLC 5/5/2014 ▪ Viking Propane, Inc.