East Carolina University s13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Carolina University s13

East Carolina University Department of Psychology Thesis Scoring Rubric

Introduction  Provides background information and summarizes major work in the area  Establishes compelling statement of the problem  Research questions clearly stated and emerge naturally from problem statement  The research problem is significant and will contribute practical or theoretical knowledge  Important terms used in the study adequately defined  Assumptions and limitations of the study clearly stated

Review of the Literature  Uses primary sources  Identifies key people and ideas in area selected  Literature review addresses problem area and research questions

Method  Sample fully described  Methodology is sound and research design and procedure clearly stated  Instrumentation and equipment fully described  Statistics are appropriate for problem

Results  Results of the statistical analysis presented in a clear and understandable form  Tables used to summarize data

Discussion  Clear statement of whether the hypotheses were supported or rejected  Conclusions integrate previous literature and major alternative points of view  Draws warranted and judicious conclusions that are substantiated by the evidence  Conclusions clearly explain results  Generalizations confined to the population from which the sample was selected  Describes implications for the profession  Describes implications for future research

Other Sections  Abstract concise and descriptive  Reference list complete and all references cited in body of project report  Instrument included in appendix  Informed consent form and IRB approval included appendix

Style  Adheres to APA Style and follows Graduate School format  Logically organized and clearly written  The tone is impartial and scientific Thesis Scoring Summary

Student: Date of Defense: Semester/Year: Rater:

1. Introduction

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

2. Review of Literature

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

3. Methodology

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

4. Results

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

5. Discussion

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

6. Other sections

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

7. Style

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

8. Overall Rating (0-4 below std; 5-7 at std; 8-10 above std).

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Scoring for items 1-7: 10 = Clear and consistent evidence that section meets standards 5 = Clear evidence that section meets standards 0 = Inconsistent or absent evidence that section meets standards

Recommended publications