East Carolina University s13

East Carolina University s13

<p> East Carolina University Department of Psychology Thesis Scoring Rubric</p><p>Introduction  Provides background information and summarizes major work in the area  Establishes compelling statement of the problem  Research questions clearly stated and emerge naturally from problem statement  The research problem is significant and will contribute practical or theoretical knowledge  Important terms used in the study adequately defined  Assumptions and limitations of the study clearly stated</p><p>Review of the Literature  Uses primary sources  Identifies key people and ideas in area selected  Literature review addresses problem area and research questions</p><p>Method  Sample fully described  Methodology is sound and research design and procedure clearly stated  Instrumentation and equipment fully described  Statistics are appropriate for problem</p><p>Results  Results of the statistical analysis presented in a clear and understandable form  Tables used to summarize data</p><p>Discussion  Clear statement of whether the hypotheses were supported or rejected  Conclusions integrate previous literature and major alternative points of view  Draws warranted and judicious conclusions that are substantiated by the evidence  Conclusions clearly explain results  Generalizations confined to the population from which the sample was selected  Describes implications for the profession  Describes implications for future research</p><p>Other Sections  Abstract concise and descriptive  Reference list complete and all references cited in body of project report  Instrument included in appendix  Informed consent form and IRB approval included appendix</p><p>Style  Adheres to APA Style and follows Graduate School format  Logically organized and clearly written  The tone is impartial and scientific Thesis Scoring Summary</p><p>Student: Date of Defense: Semester/Year: Rater: </p><p>1. Introduction</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>2. Review of Literature</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>3. Methodology</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>4. Results</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>5. Discussion</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>6. Other sections</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>7. Style</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>8. Overall Rating (0-4 below std; 5-7 at std; 8-10 above std).</p><p>10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0</p><p>Scoring for items 1-7: 10 = Clear and consistent evidence that section meets standards 5 = Clear evidence that section meets standards 0 = Inconsistent or absent evidence that section meets standards</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us