Vortex-Lattice Utilization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NASA SP-405 VORTEX-LATTICE UTILIZATION (NRSA-5P-405) V3BTZX- LATTIZZ UTILIZF.TION N76-28163 (?iASA) 409 p HC 611.Ci0 CSCL 31A THRU N76-28186 rn Unclas .- H1/02 47615 A workshop held at LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER Hampton, Virginia May 17-18, 1976 I NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPAC ERRATA NASA SP-405 VORTEX-LATTICE UTILIZATION Page 231: Figure 6 is in error. Replace figure 6 with the following corrected version. Figure 6.- Span load and section suction distributions on a swept and skewed wing. h = 45O; A = 1; M = 0. NASA SP-405 VORTEX-LATTICE UTILIZATION A workshop held at Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, on May 17-18, 1976 Prepared by Lungley Research Center Srietrlifir and Terhnirnl lrlformdtion Ofice !9'h u 5. b. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. CONTENTS PREFACE ..................................iii o)tl/7- . 1. HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF VORTEX-LATTICE METHODS ............ 1 j. John DeYoung, Vought Corporation Hampton Technical Center - SESSION I - CONFIGURATION DESIGN AND ANALYSIS AND WALL EFFECTS Chairman: Percy J. Bobbitt, NASA Langley Research Center A. WING-BODY COMBINATIONS 2. SUBSONIC FINITC ELEMENTS FOR WING-BODY COMBINATIONS ......... 11 James L. Thomas, NASA Langley Research Center 3. EXTENDED APPLICATIONS OF THE VORTEX LATTICE METHOD ......... 27 Luis R. Miranda, Lockheed-California Company B. NONPLANAR CONFIGURATIONS 4. WMERICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE INDUCED DRAG OR OPTIMUM LOADING FOR ARBITRARY NON-PLANAR AIRCRAFT ................. 49 James A. Blackwell, Jr., Lockheed-Georgia Company 5. OPTIMIZATION AND DESIGN OF THREE-DIMEKSIONAL AERODYNAMIC CONFIGURATIONS OF ARBITRARY SHAPE BY A VORTEX LATTICE METHOD .............................. 71 Wlnfried M. Feifel, The Boeing Company 6. MINIMUM TRIM DUG DESIGN FOR INTERFERING LIFTING SURFACES USING VORTEX-LATTICE METHODOLOGY ................. 89 John E. Lamar, NASA Langley Research Center 7. APPLICATIONS OF VORTEX-LATTICE THEORY TO PRELIMINARY AERObYNAMICDESIGN ........................ 113 John W. Paulson, Jr., NASA Langley Research Center C. PROPULSION AERODYNAMICS 8. UTILIZATION OF THE AEDC THREE-DIMENSIONAL POTENTIAL FLOW COMPUTER PROGRAM ......................... 127 Richard L. Palko, ARO, Inc. D . WALL EFFECTS 9. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF A SLOTTED WIND-TUNNEL WALL REPRESENTATION USING THE VORTEX-LATTICE TECHNIQUE ......... 145 Fred L. Heltsley, ARO, Inc. SESSION I1 - HIGH LIFT Chairman: Edward C, Polhamus, NASA Langley Research Center A. FLAPS 10. A QUADRILATERAL VORTEX METHOD APPLIED TO CONFIGURATIONS WITH HIGH CIRCULATION ......................... 163 Brian Maskew, Analytical Methods, Inc. B. WING-JET 11. UPPER-SURFACE-BLOWING JET-WING INTERACTION ............. 187 C. Edward Lan, The University of Kansas 12. CALCULATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WINGFLAP CONFIGURATIONS WITH EXTERNALLY BLOWN FLAPS ....... 199 Michael R. Meadenhall, Nielsen Engineering & Research, Inc. C. VORTEX LIFT 13. SOME RECENT APPLICATIONS OF THE SUCTION ANALOGY TO ASYMMETRIC ~OWSITUATIONS........................... 219 James M. Luckring, NASA Langley Research Center 14. APPLICATION OF THE VORTEX-LATTICE TECHNIQUE TO THE ANALYSIS OF THIN WINGS WITH VORTEX SEPARATION AM) THICK MULTI-ELEMENT WINGS............................... 237 Charles W. Smith and Ishwar C. Bhateley, Fort Worth Division of General Dynamics 15. COMPARISON OF VORTEX LATTICE PREDICTED FORCES WITH WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENTS FOR THE F-4E(CCV) AIRPLANE WITH A CLOSELY COUPLED CANARD .......................... 261 Lloyd W. Gross, McDonnell Aircraft Company 16. NEW CONVERGENCE CRITERIA FOR THE VORTEX-LATTICE MODELS OF THE LEADINGEDGE SEPARATION ...................... 285 Osama A. Kandil, Dean 7'. Mook, and Ali H. Nayfeh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University SESSION I11 - NEW PROCEDURES Chairman: Willia; B. Kemp, Jr. , NASA Langley Research Center A. LATTICE ARRANGEMENT 17. ARRANGEMENT OF VORTEX LATTICES ON SUBSONIC WINGS .......... 301 Fred R. DeJarnette, North Carolina State University 18. LATTICE ARRANGEMENTS FOR RAPID CONVERGENCE ............. 325 Gary R. Hough, Vought Corporation Advanced Technology Center 19. OPTIMUM LATTICE ARRANGEMENT DEVELOPED FROM A RIGOROUS ANALYTICAL BASIS.. ............................. 343 John DeYoung, Vought Corporation Hampton Technical Center 20. A SUBVORTEX TECHNIQUE FOR THE CLOSE APPROACH TO A DISCRETIZED VORTEXSHEET ........................... 369 Brian Maskew, Analytical Methods, Inc. B. OTHERS 21. SOME APPLICATldNS OF THE QUASI VORTEX-LATTICE METHOD IN STEADY AND UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS ................. ... 385 C. Edward Lan, The University of Kansas 22. UNSTEADY now OVER WINGS HAVING SHARP-EDGE SEPARATION ........ 407 E. H. Atta, 0. A. Kandil, D. T. Mook, and A. H. Nayfeh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University SESSION IV - OPEN DISCUSSION RELATED TO FUTURE WORK Chairman: John C. Houbolt, NASA Langley Research Center 23. SUMMARY OF OPEN DISCUSSION ON FUTURE VORTEX-LATTICE UTILIZATION ... 419 John C. Houbolt, NASA Langley Research Center 24. SAMPLEWINGSFORSTUDY ....................... 423 John E. Lamar, NASA Langley Research Center vii HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF VORTEX-LATTICE METHODS John DeYoung Vought Corporation Hampton Technical Center Good morning. In this short talk I will give a review of the beginnings and some orientation of the vortex-latti ce method. The vortex-1 attice method is a discrete vortex colocation method for obtaining numerical solutions to the loading integral equation relating normal velocity an2 wing loading. It is . a branch of computer fluid dynamics which in turn is math~maticallydescended from finite-di fference concepts. Finite-difference concepts had been appl ied to the development of calculus which dates it a relatively long time ago. For our subject the beginning is much more current. Here for orientation we will follow the historical course of the vortex-lattice method in conjunction with its field of computational fluid dynamics. An outline of the concurrent development of computer fluid dynamics and vortex-lattice methods is as fol lows: L.F. RICHARDSON (1910) V.M. FALKNER (1943) FIRST USE OF NAME VORTEX-LATTI CE THEORY L. PRANDTL (1918, 1921) R. V. SOUTHWELL (1946) H. LIEPMANN (1918) C.M. TYLER, JR. (1949) R. COURANT, K. FRIEDRICHS, AND H. LEWY (1928) ELLIPTIC AND D. N. DeG. ALLEN, AND S.C.R. DENNIS HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS (1951) A. THOM (1928) FIRST NUMEPICAL D. N. DeG. ALLEN, AND R.V. SOUTHWELL SOLUTION OF VISCOUS FLUID- (1955) DYNAMICS PROBLEM F. H. HARLOW, AND J. E. FROMFI (1965) 114 - 314 RULE CHORD CONCEPT (1 937) AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS REQUIRING G. H. SHORTLEY, AND R. WELLER ADVANCED COMPUTERS, NASA SP347 (1975) (1938) LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY (WORLD WAR II) Since many mathematical models of fluid dynamics can be expressed as partial differential equations then, historically, computer fluid dynamics can be said to start with L. F. Richardson's paper. Some consider this paper as the foundation of modern numerical analysis of partial differential equations. He applied his methods to the engineering problem of determining stresses in a masonry dam. In 1918 Prandtl formulated the 1 ifting-line theory. The chord loading is concentrated into a single load vortex, thus it is a one panel chord- wise vortex lattice with flow conditions satisfied at the load line, In 1938 Prandtl proposed an expl icit fini te-di fference method for solving boundary- layer equations. Liepmann showed how to improve the convergence rate of -- - a). r.lP-Y.r.--, 4-tr*- .,.--"..Us- 7 Richardson's procedure. In later years Liepmann's method was found very compatible with electronic computers and has been further developed. The i classic paper of Courant, Friedrichs, and Levy has become a guide for practical fluid flow computational solutions. AThomn did early computational work in fluid flow, two-dimensional and flow past circular cyl inders. The 114-314 rule has a fundamental role in vortex-lattice methods. This concept first appeared in a paper by E. Pistolesi in 1937. He in effect did a single panel vortex-lattice solution for a two-dimensional wing and found that with the load vortex at the 114 chord line and downwash or normal wash point (no-flow through condition) at 314 chord, the section lift and moment for con- stant angle of attack is exactly that of thin wing theory. And lift is predicted exactly for wing with parabolic camber. This rule was first applied to wings of finite aspect ratio by W. Mutterperl (1941) and J. Weissinger (1942) and very often since by others. P.A. Byrd (1ng.-Arch. 19, 321-323, 1951) expanded Pistolesi 's work for sections divided into more than one panel on the chord and with the 1/4-314 rule applied for each panel found that l ift and moment are predicted exactly. In later years this chordwise rule received further mathematical attention. Shortley and We1 1er developed block re1axation- a developed version of Liepmann's method. It was this work from Ohio State University I had used in a gradu,,te course at Washington State in 1943 to numerically solve the Laplace equation for determining the stress pattern in a twisted grooved rod. Work at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory has contributed much to the advancement of computer fl uid dynamics. This includes the work of J. von Neumann, J. Fromrn, and F. Harlow. From Los Alamos a graphics fluid dynamics motion picture was circulated in this country in the 1960's. It showed a computer fluid dynamics flow prediction of a dam bursting and the water cascading down a gorge. V. Fa1 kner covered the wing with a grid