Development of Self-Efficacy Scales

Development of self-efficacy scales

Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Diabetes Self-Efficacy Score Grossman et No Experts Experts: relevance Total score and 3 domains 6-point Self- for Diabetes Scale al., 1987 [20] Patients: comprehensibility determined a priori Likert-type administered (SED) scale Self-Efficacy Score Cullen et al., No Adaptation of the Reduction from 35 to 11 1 domain determined by factor 6-point Self- for Diabetes Scale 2007 [17] SED [20] items not clearly described, analysis Likert-type administered (SED) Experts but use of interviews with scale experts, patients and parents and data driven (factor analysis)

Diabetes Maternal Self- Leonard et al., No Not reported Not clearly reported, but use Not reported 5-point Self- Efficacy for 1998 [26] of experts and patients’ Likert-type administered Diabetes parents opinion scale Management Scale Maternal Self- Cullen et al., No Adaptation of Data driven: factor analysis 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Self- Efficacy for 2007 [17] Maternal Self- analysis Likert-type administered Diabetes Scale Efficacy for scale Diabetes Management Scale [26]

Diabetes Insulin Hurley, 1990 No Adaptation of Not clearly described 3 domains, development unclear 6-point Self- Management [40], not Crabtree-scale Likert-type administered Diabetes Self- retrievable; [41] scale Efficacy Scale Hurley et al., (IMDSES) 1992 [23] No specific name Gerber et al., No Adaptation of Data driven: Rasch Model Unclear how many domains 4-point Interviewer- 2006 [19] IMDSES [40] and Likert-type administered translation of scale Bernal et al., 2000 [42]

Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Iannotti et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 10-point Self- Diabetes Self- 2006 [24] (unsystematic Data driven: elimination of analysis scale administered Management search) items with ceiling effects Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered (SEDM) Patients and redundancy Parents

Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Kavookjian et No Literature Data driven: factor analysis 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Interviewer- Diet Adherence al., 2005 [25] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered Scale search) scale Experts Patients

Diabetes No specific name Littlefield et al., No Not clearly Not reported 1 domain determined a priori 9-point Self- 1992 [27] described, Likert-type administered presumably scale based on literature (unsystematic search)

Diabetes No specific name Miller et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 3 domains determined by factor 11-point Self- 2007 [30] (unsystematic Data driven: factor analysis analysis Likert-type administered search) scale (0 to Experts 10)

Diabetes No specific name Moens et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 2 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- 2001 [31] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered search) scale Experts Patients

Diabetes The Talbot et al., No Experts Not reported 1 domain determined a priori VAS 0-100 Self- Multidimensional 1997 [33] Patients administered Diabetes Questionnaire (MDQ)

Diabetes SE-Type 2 Scale van der Bijl et No Literature Experts: relevance 4 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- (Diabetes al., 1999 [35] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered Management Self- search) scale Efficacy Scale) Experts Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Diabetes The Confidence in Van Der Ven No Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Self- Diabetes Self-Care et al., 2003 (unsystematic Patients: comprehensibility analysis Likert-type administered Scale (CIDS) [36] search) scale Experts Asthma Child and Parent Bursch et al., No Literature Not reported 2 domains determined a priori 5-point Self- Asthma Efficacy 1999 [16] (unsystematic Likert-type administered search) scale Patients Parents Asthma Caretaker Holden et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 3 domains determined a priori 9-point Interviewer- or Expectation 1998 [22] (unsystematic Patients: comprehensibility Likert-type self- Regarding the search) scale administered Management of Experts Pediatric Asthma Scale Asthma Self-Efficacy Scale Schlösser and No Adaptation of Data driven: factor analysis 3 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- for Children and Havermans, Self-efficacy analysis Likert-type administered Adolescents with 1992 [32] score for scale with help if Asthma (SESCA) Diabetes Scale needed (SED) [20] Asthma Asthma Self- Tobin et al., No Patients Not reported 3 domains determined a priori 5-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1987 [34] Likert-type administered (ASES) scale Asthma Selbstwirksamkeits Warschburger No Not clearly Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 6-point Self- skala für Eltern et al., 2003 described, but Data driven: item difficulty analysis Likert-type administered asthmakranker [37] based on criteria scale Kinder (SEAK) for self- management competencies defined by McNabb et al. (1986) [43] Arthritis Parent’s Arthritis Barlow et al., No Literature Not reported 2 domains determined by factor 7-point Self- Self-Efficacy Scale 2000 [14] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered (PASE) search) scale Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Experts Patients Parents Arthritis Children’s Arthritis Barlow et al., No Experts Not reported 3 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Self-Efficacy Scale 2001 [15] Patients analysis Likert-type administered (CASE) scale Parents Arthritis Rheumatoid Hewlett et al., No Experts Experts: relevance 8 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Arthritis Self- 2001 [21] Patients Data driven: factor analysis analysis Likert-type administered Efficacy Scale scale (RASE) Arthritis Arthritis Self- Lorig et al., No Experts Data driven: factor analysis 3 domains determined by factor 10-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1989 [28] Patients analysis Likert-type administered scale COPD Exercise Self- Davis et al., No Literature Not reported 1 domain determined a priori 11-point Self- Regulatory Efficacy 2007 [18] (unsystematic Likert-type administered Scale (Ex-SRES) search) scale with help if Patients needed COPD Dyspnea Migliore et al., Yes Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined a priori 7-point Self- Management 2006 [29] (unsystematic Data driven: item-to-item Likert-type administered Questionnaire search) correlations, Cronbach’s scale (DMQ) Patients alpha excluding item, corrected item-total correlation COPD COPD Self- Wigal et al., No Not reported Data driven: factor analysis 5 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1991 [38] analysis Likert-type administered scale