Development of Self-Efficacy Scales

Development of Self-Efficacy Scales

<p>Development of self-efficacy scales</p><p>Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Diabetes Self-Efficacy Score Grossman et No Experts Experts: relevance Total score and 3 domains 6-point Self- for Diabetes Scale al., 1987 [20] Patients: comprehensibility determined a priori Likert-type administered (SED) scale Self-Efficacy Score Cullen et al., No Adaptation of the Reduction from 35 to 11 1 domain determined by factor 6-point Self- for Diabetes Scale 2007 [17] SED [20] items not clearly described, analysis Likert-type administered (SED) Experts but use of interviews with scale experts, patients and parents and data driven (factor analysis)</p><p>Diabetes Maternal Self- Leonard et al., No Not reported Not clearly reported, but use Not reported 5-point Self- Efficacy for 1998 [26] of experts and patients’ Likert-type administered Diabetes parents opinion scale Management Scale Maternal Self- Cullen et al., No Adaptation of Data driven: factor analysis 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Self- Efficacy for 2007 [17] Maternal Self- analysis Likert-type administered Diabetes Scale Efficacy for scale Diabetes Management Scale [26]</p><p>Diabetes Insulin Hurley, 1990 No Adaptation of Not clearly described 3 domains, development unclear 6-point Self- Management [40], not Crabtree-scale Likert-type administered Diabetes Self- retrievable; [41] scale Efficacy Scale Hurley et al., (IMDSES) 1992 [23] No specific name Gerber et al., No Adaptation of Data driven: Rasch Model Unclear how many domains 4-point Interviewer- 2006 [19] IMDSES [40] and Likert-type administered translation of scale Bernal et al., 2000 [42]</p><p>Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Iannotti et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 10-point Self- Diabetes Self- 2006 [24] (unsystematic Data driven: elimination of analysis scale administered Management search) items with ceiling effects Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered (SEDM) Patients and redundancy Parents</p><p>Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Kavookjian et No Literature Data driven: factor analysis 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Interviewer- Diet Adherence al., 2005 [25] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered Scale search) scale Experts Patients</p><p>Diabetes No specific name Littlefield et al., No Not clearly Not reported 1 domain determined a priori 9-point Self- 1992 [27] described, Likert-type administered presumably scale based on literature (unsystematic search)</p><p>Diabetes No specific name Miller et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 3 domains determined by factor 11-point Self- 2007 [30] (unsystematic Data driven: factor analysis analysis Likert-type administered search) scale (0 to Experts 10)</p><p>Diabetes No specific name Moens et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 2 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- 2001 [31] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered search) scale Experts Patients</p><p>Diabetes The Talbot et al., No Experts Not reported 1 domain determined a priori VAS 0-100 Self- Multidimensional 1997 [33] Patients administered Diabetes Questionnaire (MDQ)</p><p>Diabetes SE-Type 2 Scale van der Bijl et No Literature Experts: relevance 4 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- (Diabetes al., 1999 [35] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered Management Self- search) scale Efficacy Scale) Experts Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Diabetes The Confidence in Van Der Ven No Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 5-point Self- Diabetes Self-Care et al., 2003 (unsystematic Patients: comprehensibility analysis Likert-type administered Scale (CIDS) [36] search) scale Experts Asthma Child and Parent Bursch et al., No Literature Not reported 2 domains determined a priori 5-point Self- Asthma Efficacy 1999 [16] (unsystematic Likert-type administered search) scale Patients Parents Asthma Caretaker Holden et al., No Literature Experts: relevance 3 domains determined a priori 9-point Interviewer- or Expectation 1998 [22] (unsystematic Patients: comprehensibility Likert-type self- Regarding the search) scale administered Management of Experts Pediatric Asthma Scale Asthma Self-Efficacy Scale Schlösser and No Adaptation of Data driven: factor analysis 3 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- for Children and Havermans, Self-efficacy analysis Likert-type administered Adolescents with 1992 [32] score for scale with help if Asthma (SESCA) Diabetes Scale needed (SED) [20] Asthma Asthma Self- Tobin et al., No Patients Not reported 3 domains determined a priori 5-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1987 [34] Likert-type administered (ASES) scale Asthma Selbstwirksamkeits Warschburger No Not clearly Experts: relevance 1 domain determined by factor 6-point Self- skala für Eltern et al., 2003 described, but Data driven: item difficulty analysis Likert-type administered asthmakranker [37] based on criteria scale Kinder (SEAK) for self- management competencies defined by McNabb et al. (1986) [43] Arthritis Parent’s Arthritis Barlow et al., No Literature Not reported 2 domains determined by factor 7-point Self- Self-Efficacy Scale 2000 [14] (unsystematic analysis Likert-type administered (PASE) search) scale Disease Instrument Study A priori Identification of Selection of items Development of self-efficacy Answer Self- or conside- items domains options interviewer rations administered Experts Patients Parents Arthritis Children’s Arthritis Barlow et al., No Experts Not reported 3 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Self-Efficacy Scale 2001 [15] Patients analysis Likert-type administered (CASE) scale Parents Arthritis Rheumatoid Hewlett et al., No Experts Experts: relevance 8 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Arthritis Self- 2001 [21] Patients Data driven: factor analysis analysis Likert-type administered Efficacy Scale scale (RASE) Arthritis Arthritis Self- Lorig et al., No Experts Data driven: factor analysis 3 domains determined by factor 10-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1989 [28] Patients analysis Likert-type administered scale COPD Exercise Self- Davis et al., No Literature Not reported 1 domain determined a priori 11-point Self- Regulatory Efficacy 2007 [18] (unsystematic Likert-type administered Scale (Ex-SRES) search) scale with help if Patients needed COPD Dyspnea Migliore et al., Yes Literature Experts: relevance 1 domain determined a priori 7-point Self- Management 2006 [29] (unsystematic Data driven: item-to-item Likert-type administered Questionnaire search) correlations, Cronbach’s scale (DMQ) Patients alpha excluding item, corrected item-total correlation COPD COPD Self- Wigal et al., No Not reported Data driven: factor analysis 5 domains determined by factor 5-point Self- Efficacy Scale 1991 [38] analysis Likert-type administered scale</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us