ISTA Seed Health Committee Official Method Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INTERNATIONAL SEED TESTING ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE D’ESSAIS DE SEMENCES INTERNATIONALE VEREINIGUNG FÜR SAATGUTPRÜFUNG
Secretariat, Zürichstrasse 50, P.O. Box 308, 8303 Bassersdorf, CH-Switzerland - Phone: +41-44-838 60 00 - Fax: +41-44-838 60 01 - Email: [email protected] - http://www.seedtest.org
ISTA Seed Health Committee Official Method Review
The Seed Health Method Validation Programme requires that methods approved as Official Methods should be reviewed after 5 years to ensure their continuing effectiveness and suitability. Official Seed Health Testing Methods are found in the International Rules for Seed Testing, Annexe to Chapter 7, Seed Health Testing Methods. There are currently 12 ISTA Official Seed Health Testing Methods that are now due for review, having been approved in 2001 (listed in Table 1). We have received no formal request for changes or withdrawal of any of these methods since 2001. The ISTA Seed Health Committee would like to receive your feedback as part of the review process.
Table 1. The twelve ISTA Official Seed Health Testing Methods to be reviewed in 2006
Method No. Pathogen Host 7-003 Botrytis cinera Helianthus annuus 7-004 Leptosphaeria Brassicaceae maculans 7-005 Ascochyta pisi Pisum sativum 7-006 Colletotrichum Phaseolus vulgaris lindemuthianum 7-007 Botrytis cinerea Linum usitatissimum 7-008 Caloscypa fulgens - Picea engelmannii and Picea glauca 7-009 Fusarium - Pinus taeda and moniliforme var. Pinus elliottii subglutinans 7-010 Drechslera oryzae Oryza sativa 7-011 Pyricularia oryzae Oryza sativa 7-012 Alternaria Oryza sativa padwickii 7-013 Ustilago nuda Hordeum vulgare 7-014 Septoria nodorum Triticum aestivum
To help us we would be pleased if you could answer the questions in the accompanying questionnaire and return it to the ISTA Secretariat at the address below by 31 August 2006, or by email to: [email protected].
International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) Zuerichstrasse 50 8303 Bassersdorf CH-Switzerland Phone: +41 44 8386006 Fax: +41 44 8386001 Email: [email protected]
INTERNATIONAL SEED TESTING ASSOCIATION SEED HEALTH COMMITTEE METHOD REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE: MAY 2006
1. Name of laboratory: Address of laboratory:
Country:
2. Contact person: Name: E-mail address: Fax number: Phone number:
1a. Please indicate in the table below which ISTA Official method(s) your laboratory use?
1b. Are the methods suitable for the purpose they are used for? Please indicate in table below yes or no.
Table 1a & 1b Method No. Pathogen Please Tick Fit for purpose? ( ) method used Yes/No 7-003 Botrytis cinera/ Helianthus annuus
7-004 Leptosphaeria maculans/ Brassicaceae
7-005 Ascochyta pisi/Pisum sativum
7-006 Colletotrichum lindemuthianum/ Phaseolus vulgaris
7-007 Botrytis cinerea/ Linum usitatissimum
7-008 Caloscypa fulgens/ Picea engelmannii and Picea glauca
7-009 Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinansl Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii
7-010 Drechslera oryzae/ Oryza sativa
7-011 Pyricularia oryzae/ Oryza sativa
7-012 Alternaria padwickii/ Oryza sativa
7-013 Ustilago nuda/Hordeum vulgare
7-014 Septoria nodorum/ Triticum aestivum
1c. If “NO” please specify for each method why you consider the method not to be suitable.
2. What further improvement do you think is necessary? Use table.
Table 2 Method No. Pathogen Key word for desired Priority for improvement* improvement** 7-003 Botrytis cinera/ Helianthus annuus
7-004 Leptosphaeria maculans/ Brassicaceae
7-005 Ascochyta pisi/Pisum sativum
7-006 Colletotrichum lindemuthianum/ Phaseolus vulgaris
7-007 Botrytis cinerea/ Linum usitatissimum
7-008 Caloscypa fulgens/ Picea engelmannii and Picea glauca
7-009 Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinansl Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii
7-010 Drechslera oryzae/ Oryza sativa
7-011 Pyricularia oryzae/ Oryza sativa
7-012 Alternaria padwickii/ Oryza sativa
7-013 Ustilago nuda/Hordeum vulgare
7-014 Septoria nodorum/ Triticum aestivum
* Key words could be specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility, alternative reagents etc. ** High or low priority
3. Is there a need to respond to a technological change in one or more methods? If yes explain in a few words.
4. Are the methods used for treated seeds and is the statement about treated seed clear?
Please note no method modification will be made as a result of this review. A method will either be accepted for a further five years or recommended for withdrawal due to the evidence submitted. Method modifications can only be approved if a full collaborative test has been submitted to the Method Validation Programme and approved by the SHC or depending on the modification when a convincing argument and supporting documentation have been supplied and approved by the SHC. PLEASE RETURN TO THE ISTA SECRETARIAT BY 31 AUGUST 2006 YOUR HELP WITH THIS REVIEW IS MUCH APPRECIATED.