Jordan's Decentralisation Reform
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Subnational Governance in Jordan
THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST STUDIES IMES CAPSTONE PAPER SERIES CENTRALIZED DECENTRALIZATION: SUBNATIONAL GOVERNANCE IN JORDAN GRACE ELLIOTT MATT CIESIELSKI REBECCA BIRKHOLZ MAY 2018 THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST STUDIES THE ELLIOTT SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY © OF GRACE ELLIOTT, MATT CIESIELSKI, REBECCA BIRKHOLZ, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Literature Review: Decentralization and 3 Authoritarian Upgrading Methodology 7 Local Governance in Jordan 9 Political Economy and Reform 12 Decentralization in Jordan 15 Decentralization as a Development Initiative 20 Political Rhetoric 28 Opportunities and Challenges 31 Conclusion 35 Works Cited 37 Appendix 41 1 Introduction Jordan is one of the last bastions of stability in an otherwise volatile region. However, its stability is threatened by a continuing economic crisis. In a survey conducted across all twelve governorates in 2017, only 22% of citizens view Jordan’s overall economic condition as “good” or “very good” compared to 49% two years ago.1 Against this backdrop of economic frustration, Jordan is embarking on a decentralization process at the local level in an attempt to bring decision-making closer to the citizen. In 2015, Jordan passed its first Decentralization Law, which continued calls from King Abdullah II dating back to 2005 to “enhance our democratic march and to continue the process of political, economic, social and administrative reform” by encouraging local participation in the provision of services and investment priorities.2 This is the latest in a series of small steps taken by the central government intended to improve governance at the local level and secure long-term stability in the Kingdom. -
Women's Political Participation in Jordan
MENA - OECD Governance Programme WOMEN’S Political Participation in JORDAN © OECD 2018 | Women’s Political Participation in Jordan | Page 2 WOMEN’S POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN JORDAN: BARRIERS, OPPORTUNITIES AND GENDER SENSITIVITY OF SELECT POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS MENA - OECD Governance Programme © OECD 2018 | Women’s Political Participation in Jordan | Page 3 OECD The mission of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is to promote policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world. It is an international organization made up of 37 member countries, headquartered in Paris. The OECD provides a forum in which governments can work together to share experiences and seek solutions to common problems within regular policy dialogue and through 250+ specialized committees, working groups and expert forums. The OECD collaborates with governments to understand what drives economic, social and environmental change and sets international standards on a wide range of things, from corruption to environment to gender equality. Drawing on facts and real-life experience, the OECD recommend policies designed to improve the quality of people’s. MENA - OECD MENA-OCED Governance Programme The MENA-OECD Governance Programme is a strategic partnership between MENA and OECD countries to share knowledge and expertise, with a view of disseminating standards and principles of good governance that support the ongoing process of reform in the MENA region. The Programme strengthens collaboration with the most relevant multilateral initiatives currently underway in the region. In particular, the Programme supports the implementation of the G7 Deauville Partnership and assists governments in meeting the eligibility criteria to become a member of the Open Government Partnership. -
Jordan 2019 Human Rights Report
JORDAN 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is a constitutional monarchy ruled by King Abdullah II bin Hussein. The constitution grants the king ultimate executive and legislative authority. The multiparty parliament consists of the 65-member Senate (Majlis al-Ayan) appointed by the king and a 130-member popularly elected House of Representatives (Majlis al-Nuwwab). Elections for the House of Representatives occur approximately every four years and last took place in 2016. International observers deemed the elections organized, inclusive, credible, and technically well run. The Public Security Directorate (PSD) has responsibility for law enforcement and reports to the Ministry of Interior. The PSD, General Intelligence Directorate (GID), gendarmerie, and Civil Defense Directorate share responsibility for maintaining internal security. The gendarmerie and Civil Defense Directorate report to the Ministry of Interior, while the GID reports directly to the king. The armed forces report to the Ministry of Defense and are responsible for external security, although they also have a support role for internal security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Significant human rights issues included: allegations of torture by security officials; arbitrary arrest and detention, including of activists and journalists; infringements on citizens’ privacy rights; restrictions on free expression and the press, including criminalization of libel, censorship, and internet site blocking; restrictions on freedom of association and assembly; incidents of official corruption; “honor” killings of women; violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) persons; and conditions amounting to forced labor in some sectors. Impunity remained widespread, although the government took limited, nontransparent steps to investigate, prosecute, and punish officials who committed abuses. -
Jordan 2020 Human Rights Report
JORDAN 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is a constitutional monarchy ruled by King Abdullah II bin Hussein. The constitution grants the king ultimate executive and legislative authority. The multiparty parliament consists of a 130-member popularly elected House of Representatives (Majlis al-Nuwwab) and a Senate (Majlis al-Ayan) appointed by the king. Elections for the House of Representatives occur approximately every four years and last took place on November 10. Local nongovernmental organizations reported some COVID-19- related disruptions during the election process but stated voting was generally free and fair. Jordan’s security services underwent a significant reorganization in December 2019 when the king combined the previously separate Public Security Directorate (police), the Gendarmerie, and the Civil Defense Directorate into one organization named the Public Security Directorate. The reorganized Public Security Directorate has responsibility for law enforcement and reports to the Ministry of Interior. The Public Security Directorate and the General Intelligence Directorate share responsibility for maintaining internal security. The General Intelligence Directorate reports directly to the king. The armed forces report to the Minister of Defense and are responsible for external security, although they also have a support role for internal security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of the security forces committed some abuses. Significant -
The Constitution of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
The Constitution of The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan CHAPTER The State and System of Government ONE CHAPTER Rights and Duties of Jordanians TWO CHAPTER Powers: General Provisions THREE CHAPTER The Executive Power FOUR Part I: The King and His Prerogatives Part II: Ministers CHAPTER The Legislative Power - The National Assembly FIVE Part I: The Senate Part II: The Chamber of Deputies Part III: Provisions Governing Both Houses CHAPTER SIX The Judiciary CHAPTER Financial Matters SEVEN CHAPTER General Provisions EIGHT CHAPTER Enforcement and Repeal of Laws NINE CHAPTER ONE The State and System of Government Article 1 The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is an independent sovereign Arab State. It is indivisible and inalienable and no part of it may be ceded. The people of Jordan form a part of the Arab Nation, and its system of government is parliamentary with a hereditary monarchy. Article 2 Islam is the religion of the State and Arabic is its official language. Article 3 The city of Amman is the capital of the Kingdom, but it may be transferred to another place by a special law. Article 4 The Jordanian flag shall be of the following form and dimensions: “The length of the flag shall be twice its width. It shall be divided horizontally into three parallel and equal stripes, the uppermost of which shall be black, the center, white, and the lowest, green. At the end of the flag-staff the flag shall have a red triangle, the base of which shall be equal to its width. In the triangle there shall be a white seven- pointed star of such a size that it may be one-fourteenth part of its length. -
Legal Review of the Jordanian Decentralization Law
Legal Review of the Jordanian Decentralization Law Final Report Karak Castle Center for Consultations and Training A national institution established in 2008 in the Governorate of Karak in the south of the capital Amman. The center aims to build and enhance the capacities of women and youth, and thereby contribute to their economic, political and legal empowerment and to improve their skills and to provide opportunities for equal and eective participation in the development of society within a framework that respects the principles of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Issued by Karak Castle Center for Consultations and Training in Cooperation with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES) December 2018 Karak Castle Center for Consultations and Training E-Mail: [email protected] Facebook: KarakCastleCenter www.karakcastle.org Legal Review of the Jordanian Decentralization Law Final Report Issue by: Karak Castle Center for Consultations and Training December 2018 Report team: Lawyer Esraa Mahadin Director, Karak Castle Center Carlo Binda Mohammad Khasawneh Managing Director, Binda Senior Export, Binda Consulting International (BCI) Consulting International (BCI) Researcher Researcher Research Team: Mohammad Awamreh Mai Qatawneh Ola Sawaie Mohammad Hanaqtah Mahmoud Sbiehat Ziad Shamari Esraa Banawi Zuhir Khawaldeh Omran Etoum Amani Owies Badi Ebqaien Yara Nabulsi Translation Team: Rasha Nakai Hala Makahleh Firas Khalil Language Review: Francesca Binda Halla Hadidi Graphic Design: Mohammad Khasawneh (c) All rights reserved for Karak Castle Center for Consultation and Trainings & Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2018. Disclaimer: All graphs and illustrations in this report belongs to Karak Castle Center & Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Legal Review of the Jordanian Decentralization Law Acknowledgment Karak Castle Center for Consultations and Training drafted this report in partnership with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) / Amman office, which provided support for the success of this project in cooperation with the Ministry of Political and Parliamentary Affairs (MoPPA). -
Jordan 2018 Human Rights Report
JORDAN 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is a constitutional monarchy ruled by King Abdullah II bin Hussein. The constitution concentrates executive and legislative authority in the king. The multiparty parliament consists of the 65-member House of Notables (Majlis al-Ayan) appointed by the king and a 130-member elected lower house, the Chamber of Deputies (Majlis al-Nuwwab). Elections for the Chamber of Deputies occur approximately every four years and last took place in 2016. International observers deemed the elections organized, inclusive, credible, and technically well run. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Human rights issues included allegations of torture by security officials, including at least one death in custody; arbitrary arrest and detention, including of activists and journalists; infringements on citizens’ privacy rights; undue restrictions on free expression and the press, including criminalization of libel, censorship, and internet site blocking; restrictions on freedom of association and assembly; reports of refoulement of Syrian and Palestinian refugees to Syria without adjudication of whether they had a well-founded fear of persecution; allegations of corruption, including in the judiciary; “honor” killings of women; violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) persons; and conditions amounting to forced labor in some sectors. Impunity remained widespread, although the government took limited, nontransparent steps to investigate, prosecute, and punish officials who committed abuses. Information on the outcomes was not publicly available. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were some reports of arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of life. -
Engaging Citizens in Jordan's Local Government Needs Assessment
OECD Public Governance Reviews Governance Public OECD OECD Public Governance Reviews Engaging Citizens in Jordan’s Local Government Needs Assessment Process Engaging Citizens in Citizens Engaging Jordan’s Local Government Needs Assessment Process Assessment Needs Government Local Jordan’s OECD Public Governance Reviews Engaging Citizens in Jordan’s Local Government Needs Assessment Process This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2020), Engaging Citizens in Jordan’s Local Government Needs Assessment Process, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c3bddbcb-en. ISBN 978-92-64-52125-4 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-81147-8 (pdf) OECD Public Governance Reviews ISSN 2219-0406 (print) ISSN 2219-0414 (online) Photo credits: Cover © geogifShutterstock.com; G KiplingShutterstock.com. Corrigenda to publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 2020 The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions. 3 Foreword Local governments – regional, provincial, and municipal –have a direct impact on people’s daily lives and are essential to building more open and inclusive societies. Not only are local governments often responsible for the delivery of crucial services, but they also play an intermediary role between public and national administrations. Given their proximity to citizens, they are often more present, and have a better understanding of public priorities and of differences in needs. -
Municipal and Governorate Council Elections of August 2017: August 2017 Decentralization Efforts in Jordan
COUNTRY REPORT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. JORDANIEN DR. ANNETTE RANKO MARCO LOTZ HALA ABU GHAZALEH IMKE HAASE The Municipal and Governorate Council Elections of August 2017: August 2017 Decentralization Efforts in Jordan Abstract The governorate and municipal council elec- tions of August 2017 were part and parcel of Jordan’s plans to formalize a framework for the country’s decentralization, building on plans of King Abdullah II. This frame- work was bolstered by new laws passed in 2015 which introduced the governorate council as a new, elected subnational advi- sory body. While the new governorate councils have the potential to increase local participation in the formulation of local de- velopment needs and service-provision, they have no legislative authority. In general the election was well organized and conduct was orderly. Though there were minor electoral violations witnessed, there was no systemic violation of the pro- cess. Turnout for the governorate and mu- nicipal elections was at 31.7 percent and therefore lower than expected. However, this marks an increase of 6.5 per cent com- pared to the last local elections. The turnout in major cities was especially sobering; in Amman, only 16,08 percent of eligible vot- ers went to the polls. Tribal affiliations dominated yet again and a majority of nominees ran as independent candidates rather than on a political party basis. The only political parties that achieved noteworthy successes at the elec- tions were Islamist parties. In that sense the governorate and municipal elections mark a continuation of “the return of the Islamists” to Jordanian representative bod- ies. -
Report of the Election Monitory Mission of 19Th Parliamentary General Election 10Th November 2020
THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN REPORT OF THE ELECTION MONITORY MISSION OF 19TH PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION 10TH NOVEMBER 2020 19TH PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION OF HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN HELD ON NOVEMBER 10, 2020 IPC REPORT 2020 This report contains the findings of the International Parliamentarians’ Congress Delegation who visited the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to observe General Elections held on November 10, 2020. REPORT The International Parliamentarians Congress (IPC) hereby acknowledge the Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services (PIPS) as our publishing partner and for providing their valuable feedback on our report in terms of the quality enhancement and coherence. JORDAN PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION 2020 MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT A key regional player in Middle Eastern politics, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan occupies a strategic location in the heart of the world. Its geographical contiguity with West Bank and the occupied Palestinian territories provides it with a special place in the Palestine conflict, which continues to linger on the minds and hearts of Muslims, specifically, and the humanity at large. The efforts of Jordanian authorities in resisting the Israeli occupation in Al Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif are certainly commendable. The Hashemite custodianship of the sacred places in Jerusalem for the past nine decades has been a key factor in preserving the Muslims’ rights in the occupied territories. 2. On November 10, 2020, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan held the 19th Parliamentary elections for 130 seats of the House of Representatives. At a time when the world was grappling with the fallouts of the global pandemic i.e. COVID-19, the conduct of such an activity involving mass gatherings was certainly a gigantic task for the authorities.