DOCSLIB.ORG

Horizon Scanning Opportunities for New Technologies and Industries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Horizon Scanning Opportunities for New Technologies and Industries by Grant Hamilton, Levi Swann, Vibhor Pandey, Char-lee Moyle, Jeremy Opie and Akira Dawson July 2019 © 2019 AgriFutures Australia All rights reserved. Horizon Scanning – Opportunities for New Technologies and Industries: Final Report Publication No. 19-028 Project No. PRJ-011108 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, AgriFutures Australia, the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, AgriFutures Australia, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. However, wide dissemination is encouraged. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to AgriFutures Australia Communications Team on 02 6923 6900. Researcher Contact Details Name: Dr Grant Hamilton Address: QUT, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4001 Phone: +61 3138 2318 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to AgriFutures Australia publishing this material in its edited form. AgriFutures Australia Contact Details Building 007, Tooma Way Charles Sturt University Locked Bag 588 Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 02 6923 6900 [email protected] www.agrifutures.com.au Electronically published by AgriFutures Australia at www.agrifutures.com.au in July 2019 AgriFutures Australia is the new trading name for Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation (RIRDC), a statutory authority of the Federal Government established by the Primary Industries Research and Development Act 1989. ii Foreword Emerging technologies and new industries have the potential to transform Australian agriculture and will be a key contributor in growing the sector towards becoming Australia’s next $100 billion industry. AgriFutures Australia plays an important role in identifying these opportunities early and developing an ecosystem for technology development and adoption as well as supporting emerging industries to prosper and grow. This report is the culmination of two years’ work by the Queensland University of Technology, uncovering 39 unique emerging technologies with potential for game-changing impact on Australia’s rural industries. Many of the emerging technologies showcased have been identified by industry experts as having significant commercial impact and transferability from overseas or non-agricultural domains for use on Australian farms or within the agricultural value chain. AgriFutures Australia is pleased to demonstrate, through this report, the diverse and significant opportunities for developing and integrating emerging technologies into the agriculture sector. Capitalising on the insights developed for emerging technologies, the report also summarises 24 new agriculture industries that have the potential to develop due to the influence of emerging technologies. In the agriculture sector particularly, we know that emerging technologies have a range of possible impacts on the emergence of new industries. In some cases, the role is to enhance the viability of existing industries, such as through improving productivity and efficiency. In others, technology assumes a transformational role, developing entirely new ways of doing things and facilitating new products to address both growing and emerging markets. In either case, it will be essential to identify how technology can continue to build innovative agricultural industries and ensure the long-term prosperity of the sector. This work underscores the opportunity to think differently and look in new places for how the sector can continue to innovate and grow. The findings are particularly relevant to new and existing producers seeking to diversify their business either through the adoption of new technology or to expand their enterprise mix with novel industries. Equally, this work presents longer-term trends for what the future of agricultural innovation looks like and gives us a window into the possibilities, stretching our perspectives beyond what we currently know to the opportunities that exist into the future. Some of the technologies identified through the five Horizon Scans have already been adopted, such as LoRaWAN and personal analytics, while others may be more futuristic. The addition of the analysis covering new and emerging industries is a useful addition when evaluating the multitude of opportunities for the future of the sector. This report is an addition to AgriFutures Australia’s diverse range of over 2000 research publications and it forms part of our Emerging Industries arena, which aims to support new and emerging rural industries. A series of five horizon scans have been published through this project and are available, along with most of AgriFutures Australia’s publications, for free downloading or purchasing online at: www.agrifutures.com.au. John Harvey Managing Director AgriFutures Australia iii Acknowledgments The research provider Queensland University of Technology acknowledges the financial assistance of AgriFutures Australia in order to undertake this project. The contributions of members of the Australian rural industries, who gave their time to participate in surveys as part of this research, are also acknowledged. iv Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. vii Methodology ..................................................................................................................... vii Summary of Watchlist ....................................................................................................... vii Emerging Agriculture Industries ...................................................................................... viii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 2 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 2 Horizon Scans ...................................................................................................................... 2 New Industries Scans .......................................................................................................... 5 Iterative Surveys with Technology Domain Experts ........................................................... 6 Summary of Watchlist ............................................................................................................... 8 Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Technologies .............................................................. 8 Data Technologies ............................................................................................................. 11 Biotechnology and Genomics Technologies ..................................................................... 14 Renewable Energy Technologies ...................................................................................... 17 Business Model Technologies ........................................................................................... 20 Advanced Material Technologies ...................................................................................... 24 Emerging Agriculture Industries .............................................................................................. 26 Medicinal Marijuana ......................................................................................................... 28 Hemp Milk ........................................................................................................................ 28 Hydroponic Berries ........................................................................................................... 29 Hydroponic Chinese (Asian) Vegetables .......................................................................... 30 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 31 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Surveillance for Food Safety Designing a Surveillance Approach and Considerations for Implementation

    Strategic Surveillance for Food Safety Designing a Surveillance Approach and Considerations for Implementation

    Strategic Surveillance for Food Safety Designing a surveillance approach and considerations for implementation Jon Freeman, Nathan Ryan, Julian Glenesk For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2519 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. RAND Europe is a not-for-profit research organisation that helps to improve policy and decision making through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.randeurope.org Preface This document reports on RAND Europe’s study into the Food Standards Agency’s (FSA) strategic surveillance programme. The FSA commissioned the study in February 2018. The aim of the project is to design a high-level end-to-end approach for strategic surveillance, identify relevant analytic tools and methods, and develop an implementation plan for the programme. The report’s intended audience is the FSA, the programme’s senior responsible officer (SRO), those involved in the current practice of food surveillance and the nascent strategic surveillance team (SST).
  • Horizon Scanning

    Horizon Scanning

    Horizon Scanning Process Updated: April 2015 Version 1.0 REVISION HISTORY Periodically, this document will be revised as part of ongoing process improvement activities. The following version control table, as well the version number and date on the cover page, is to be updated when any updates or revisions are made. Section Revision Date Description/Changes Made Number Horizon Scanning: Process 2 Effective Date: April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Revision History ....................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 About Horizon Scanning .............................................................................................. 5 1.2 Scope .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Audience ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Primary Audience: ............................................................................................ 5 1.3.2 Secondary Audience ........................................................................................ 5 1.4 Purpose and Application for Decision-Making .............................................................
  • Different Hype Cycle Viewpoints for an E-Learning System

    Different Hype Cycle Viewpoints for an E-Learning System

    IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–7388,p-ISSN: 2320–737X Volume 4, Issue 5 Ver. II (Sep-Oct. 2014), PP 88-95 www.iosrjournals.org Different Hype Cycle Viewpoints for an E-Learning System Logica Banica1 1Faculty of Economics, University of Pitesti, Romania Abstract: This paper uses Gartner Group’s Hype Cycle as an analysis tool for the e-learning platform integration process at the University of Pitesti. The platform was installed three years ago and during this time there were many points of view (by major user groups) regarding the usefulness and adoption rate. Based on this fact, according to us, the e-learning Hype Cycle has two graphical representations, two variation curves that have the first part identical but differ significantly in the following two stages, differences that disappear in the end. Based on our analysis, we found necessary to improve the management strategies, to better motivate the teachers in order for them to reach the same level of interested shown by the students in using the system, and thus bringing the two educational groups to the same opinion. We have depicted all this evolution and the different points of view by the Hype Cycle curve, that should be only one for the 5th year of system presence in our institution, a convergence reached a bit too late in the IT world, where software solutions have a limited life cycle. Keywords: Hype Cycle, e-learning, academic collaboration I. Introduction This paper is a new approach of our research on learning systems related to the academic domain: e- learning.
  • Horizon Scanning Why Is It So Hard?

    Horizon Scanning Why Is It So Hard?

    Horizon Scanning Why is it so hard? By Dr. Peter Bishop University of Houston September 2009 Introduction Surprise is an odd emotion. We like to be surprised–an unexpected visit from a friend, a gift from our spouse, a beautiful spring day. Sometimes we even pay to be surprised–at the fair or the cinema. But surprise is not a good thing at work. Being surprised means that we expected something to happen that didn’t or something to not happen that did. It’s just not right even when the surprise is a good thing,. We are supposed to know what is going on and what is about to happen all time--to know and be prepared for everything that occurs. We are never supposed to be surprised. Of course that is unreasonable. Everyone is surprised even at work, even though we try not to show it when it happens. So we basically cover-up--never let them see you be surprised, even when you are. But rather than just wait, we can take steps to reduce surprise even if we cannot eliminate it altogether. Horizon or environmental scanning warns us about change coming in the future. The term evokes images of lookouts on old ships or modern-day radar scanning the horizon. Lookouts and radars report sightings or signals from objects that are far off before they have the chance to harm to a vessel, a plane or a fortified encampment. It takes time for the objects to get to the lookout’s or the radar’s location, time that people can use to prepare.
  • REGULATING the FUTURE and the NEW NORMAL (Or Is It the Future of Regulation?)

    REGULATING the FUTURE and the NEW NORMAL (Or Is It the Future of Regulation?)

    REGULATING THE FUTURE AND THE NEW NORMAL (or is it the future of regulation?) 2nd Webinar Session 6th ASEAN-OECD Good Regulatory Practices Network (GRPN) 5 October 2020 Nick Malyshev Head of the Regulatory Policy Division OECD Regulatory challenges in the era of digitalisation 1. Pacing problem 2. Designing “fit for purpose” regulatory frameworks 3. Regulatory enforcement 4. Institutional and trans-boundary challenge These challenges are exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic Regulatory approaches Regulatory policy and co-operation are the cornerstone of effectiveness and efficiency Approaches: • Anticipatory governance (e.g. horizon-scanning, scenario-planning) • Wait and see • Guidance • Self-regulation and co-regulation (e.g. industry standards, ethical business regulation) • Regulatory experiments (e.g. sandboxes, testbeds) • Traditional regulations (e.g. outcome based regulations, means-based regulation etc.) OECD Workstreams on Regulations & Emerging Technologies Work programme: 1. Digitising regulatory delivery (2019/2020) 2. Future of regulators: the impact of emerging technologies on economic regulators (2019/2020) 3. Digital technology & regulatory responses to COVID-19 (2021/22) - collaborative project & database with the World Bank 4. Data driven regulation (2021/22) Principles on “effective and innovation-friendly rulemaking in the Fourth Industrial Revolution” Four pillars guiding the development of the principles: 1. The governance and institutional set up supporting effective/ agile/future regulation, inclusive role of oversight,
  • THE FUTURE of the WORLD OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, Spi

    THE FUTURE of the WORLD OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, Spi

    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, SPi OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NOT FOR SALE DO NOT COPY THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, SPi OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NOT FOR SALE DO NOT COPY OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, SPi OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NOT FOR SALE DO NOT COPY The Future of the World Futurology, Futurists, and the Struggle for the Post-Cold War Imagination JENNY ANDERSSON 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 05/07/18, SPi OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NOT FOR SALE DO NOT COPY 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Jenny Andersson 2018 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2018 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2018933809 ISBN 978–0–19–881433–7 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
  • Definition of Horizon Scanning (Or Wide Scope Foresight)

    Definition of Horizon Scanning (Or Wide Scope Foresight)

    S&T Foresight & Horizon scanning Influencing R&D priorities Netherlands Victor van Rij – Ministry OCW - Netherlands Presentation for TIP- RIHR OECD workshop Enhancing Research Performance Through Evaluation and Priority Setting 15-16 September 2008 OECD Enhancing Research Performance Through Evaluation and Priority Setting S&T Foresight & Horizon scanning Influencing R&D priorities • Position Foresight and Horizon scanning in the R&D cycle • Horizon scanning • Possible systematic approach to influence the research agenda to future societal challenges and scientific opportunities OECD Enhancing Research Performance Through Evaluation and Priority Setting International New insight International science New technology & (scientific) education Human resources New insight Expectations New technology Applications EXECUTION Solutions R&D Experts PROGRAMS R&D OUTPUT ResearchResearch R&D PROGRAM programmingcyclusprogrammingcyclus PRIORITY SETTING AND DESIGN R&D PROGRAM ASSESSMENT NEW R&D QUESTIONS CHALLENGES Foresight Society Horizon Short term Scanning Long term Planning Problems & Opportunities Economy OECD Enhancing Research Performance Through Evaluation and Priority Setting Public Funds for Research Netherlands • 3 to 4 billion € a year • 77 % basic or institutional funding • 23 % project - program funding • Foresight and Horizon scanning supports external and internal decisions on the questions to answer by R&D S&T Foresight in the Netherlands Societal oriented thematic S&T foresight (COS-Min Ed Cult Science - others) : ocean farming, key
  • A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning

    A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning

    AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C Prepared by: Fang Sun, M.D., Ph.D. Karen Schoelles, M.D., S.M., F.A.C.P ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC104-EF August 2013 This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to identify resources and methods for improving the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System in the future. The purpose of the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System is to assist funders of research in making well-informed decisions in designing and funding comparative-effectiveness research. This report may periodically be assessed for the urgency to update. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program website at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
  • Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in Healthtech What Do the Present and Future Hold? Foreword

    Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in Healthtech What Do the Present and Future Hold? Foreword

    www.pwc.com/sg Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech What do the present and future hold? Foreword A collaborative, data-driven and evidence based study The last few years have seen an explosion of technology along with an increasing convergence of the Healthcare, Medical Devices, HealthTech, Pharma and Digital realms. It is imperative that in the midst of this, we keep the patients and their problems at the heart of it all. To effectively do so, understanding continuously evolving patient needs will be critical. And by doing so, we can better solve the real challenges they face and provide solutions to complement current clinical practices and technologies to improve what we at PwC call the 3 As in healthcare: Affordable, Accessible and A+ quality care. However, with the rapid and exponential pace of technological advancement, how do we keep track of the game-changing and clinically impactful developments? What are the present trends driving these developments, and what are likely future trends? Is there a fit-for- purpose framework that can be applied to assist in the assessment of these technologies? What will be the implications to regulators, health technology assessments (HTA), policy makers, payers, healthcare professionals and any and all other stakeholders? Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech aims to answer these questions. For the purposes of this paper, MedTech refers to the traditional innovation-led, fully integrated medical device industry. HealthTech on the other hand, refers to information technology (IT)-led solutions which are more patient-focused and comprise start-ups and non-traditional players who are causing an industry paradigm shift.
  • This May Be the Author's Version of a Work That Was Submitted/Accepted for Publication in the Following Source: Dedehayir

    This May Be the Author's Version of a Work That Was Submitted/Accepted for Publication in the Following Source: Dedehayir

    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Dedehayir, Ozgur & Steinert, Martin (2016) The hype cycle model: A review and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, pp. 28-41. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/95588/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005 The Hype Cycle model: A review and future directions The hype cycle model traces the evolution of technological innovations as they pass through successive stages pronounced by the peak, disappointment, and recovery of expectations.
  • Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040

    Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040

    Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 Exploring the S&T Edge NATO Science & Technology Organization DISCLAIMER The research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&T Organization (STO) drawing upon the support of the Alliance’s defence S&T community, NATO Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and the NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA). This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments, but provides considered advice to NATO and Nations’ leadership on significant S&T issues. D.F. Reding J. Eaton NATO Science & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATO Headquarters B-1110 Brussels Belgium http:\www.sto.nato.int Distributed free of charge for informational purposes; hard copies may be obtained on request, subject to availability from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist. The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes is prohibited. Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes subject to attribution to the NATO S&T Organization. Unless otherwise credited all non-original graphics are used under Creative Commons licensing (for original sources see https://commons.wikimedia.org and https://www.pxfuel.com/). All icon-based graphics are derived from Microsoft® Office and are used royalty-free. Copyright © NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020 First published, March 2020 Foreword As the world Science & Tech- changes, so does nology Trends: our Alliance. 2020-2040 pro- NATO adapts. vides an assess- We continue to ment of the im- work together as pact of S&T ad- a community of vances over the like-minded na- next 20 years tions, seeking to on the Alliance.
  • Water Research Paradigm Shifts in South Africa Page 1 of 9

    Water Research Paradigm Shifts in South Africa Page 1 of 9

    Research Article Water research paradigm shifts in South Africa Page 1 of 9 Water research paradigm shifts in South Africa AUTHORS: Raymond Siebrits1 We performed a scientometric analysis of water research publications extracted from four decades of South Kevin Winter1 African related papers to identify paradigms and paradigm shifts within water research in South Africa. Inga Jacobs2 Between 1977 and 1991, research publications are dominated by research into technical and engineering solutions, as well as designs and plans to secure water supply. From 1992 to 2001, publications on AFFILIATIONS: water pollution, water quality, water resource management and planning are prominent. The second major 1 Environmental and Geographical paradigm is observed from 2001 to 2011 in which the emphasis is on planning, modelling, catchment-scale Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa studies and a multidisciplinary approach to research. Another transition period, towards the end of 2011, is 2Water Research Commission, characterised by uncertainty, although it also shows the prominence of key concepts such as participation, Pretoria, South Africa governance and politics in water management. The second aim of this study was to identify and prioritise current and future water research questions through the participation of a wide range of researchers from CORRESPONDENCE TO: across the country, and to relate these questions to research paradigms, issues and concerns in water in Kevin Winter South Africa. Over 1600 questions were collected, reduced in number and then prioritised by specialists in the water sector. The majority (78%) of questions offered by respondents in the South African case EMAIL: [email protected] study dealt with relatively short- to medium-term research requirements with 47% of questions focused on medium-term issues such as supplying water, service delivery and technical solutions.