DOCSLIB.ORG

Retail MONTGOMERY COUNTY Retail Strategy Q3 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retail MONTGOMERY COUNTY Retail Strategy Q3 2017 a retail MONTGOMERY COUNTY Retail Strategy Q3 2017 Montgomery County Retail Study | Q3 2017 b ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SPECIAL THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE WHO CONTRIBUTED THEIR KNOWLEDGE TO THIS STUDY: Judy Stephenson - Office of the County Executive - Montgomery County Lily Qi - Office of the County Executive - Montgomery County Gary Erenrich - Montgomery County Department of Transportation CLIENT TEAM (MCDOT) Gwen Wright - Director, Montgomery County Planning Department Rose Krasnow -Deputy Director, Montgomery County Planning Department Rick Liu - Montgomery County Planning Department Roberto Ruiz - Montgomery County Planning Department Amy Lindsey - Montgomery County Planning Department Caroline McCarthy - Montgomery County Planning Department Jacob Sesker - Montgomery County Council (formerly at Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation [MCEDC]) Richelle Wilson - Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation CONSULTANT TEAM (MCEDC) Robert Kronenberg -Montgomery County Planning Department Patrick Butler - Montgomery County Planning Department Matthew Folden - Montgomery County Planning Department Christina Sassaki - Montgomery County Parks Department Patricia McManus - Montgomery County Parks Department Kathie Durbin - Montgomery County Department of Liquor Control Simni Rasolee - Montgomery County Department of Permitting Services Matthew Shanks - Montgomery County Department of Permitting Services Montgomery County Retail Study | Q3 2017 INTRODUCTION 1 c PURPOSE 2 ROCKVILLE 54 SETTING THE STAGE 3 SILVER SPRING 59 SUPPLY-BASED TERMINOLOGY 4 WEST COUNTY 64 DEMAND-BASED TERMINOLOGY 7 WHEATON-GLENMONT 68 WHITE OAK 73 RETAIL ENVIRONMENT 8 RETAIL TRENDS 9 REGULATION IMPACT ANALYSIS 77 RETAILER DECISION MAKING 14 REGULATORY RECOMMENDATIONS 78 COUNTY RETAIL TOPICS 16 MONTGOMERY COUNTY RETAIL HISTORY 17 CONCLUSIONS 84 MONTGOMERY COUNTY REGIONAL STANDING 18 METHODOLOGY 87 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 19 INVENTORY SUMMARY 20 TECHNICAL APPENDIX 90 SUBMARKET ASSESSMENTS 23 LOCAL RETAIL INTERVIEW FINDINGS 91 BUSINESS AID ORGANIZATIONS 98 SUBMARKETS DEFINED 24 SUBMARKET DEMAND TABLES 101 ASPEN HILL 25 BETHESDA 29 contents EAST COUNTY 34 GAITHERSBURG 38 GERMANTOWN-CLARKSBURG 42 KENSINGTON 46 OLNEY 50 Montgomery County Retail Study | Q3 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAJOR FINDINGS that serve a diverse range of populations. eventually become oversaturated with The County can continue to distinguish aging or underperforming retail. This Following a ninth-month study and analysis itself within the DC area by embracing this condition contributes to higher levels of of existing, under construction, proposed, diversity as part of its market distinction. vacancy, lower rental rates, and declining and potential retail throughout Montgomery These diverse populations contribute to the overall sales. The County should prioritize County, the following conclusions were overall spending economy and are integral the repositioning of existing space in reached. to developing an equally diverse range tandem with new development to avoid this 1. Montgomery County is in good retail of retail to serve Montgomery County’s phenomenon in future years. health. Unlike other counties across the neighborhoods and businesses. The United States, Montgomery County has County will benefit from focusing on the 3. Continue to condense retail at major Retail in Montgomery reined in retail development to a larger development and support of these unique intersections. County has historically clustered at major degree, which has resulted in maintaining small businesses, as these businesses are intersections—roads that once were critical relative equilibrium currently and at 5- market differentiators for the DC area. trade routes and are now major commuter and 10-year increments for most of the Additionally, as supportable retail square thoroughfares. Moving forward, clustering 12 submarkets studied. Retail demand footage continues to shrink, these small will remain a sustainable retail development is condensing all over the United States, businesses will become the viable option to strategy. This development goal is which is having a particularly heavy effect best serve the neighborhoods throughout particularly relevant in areas with upcoming on large format, national retailers. These the county. development, such as Germantown- retailers are dealing with the repercussions Clarksburg and White Oak. of overexpansion and shrinking demand. MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS Montgomery County submarkets, generally, Major recommendations for each submarket The major findings and recommendations are not over-supplied to an extreme fall within the following three major themes: within this report provide context and a deeper degree—a plight that other Metropolitan understanding of how the various submarkets DC jurisdictions are facing right now. 1. Encourage the repositioning of are functioning independently and how they underperforming retail into Neighborhood interact with one another. All together, these 2. There is an opportunity to redistribute Goods & Services retail. Many submarkets major findings present the broad view of how the retail categories. There is room within are oversupplied in the General the County can continue to manage its retail the Montgomery County retail supply Merchandise, Apparel, Furniture, and economy and take advantage of opportunities to shift uses away from general goods Other (GAFO) retail category in part due for innovation and advancement. retail (e.g. clothing, household furniture, to the large number of large format stores electronics) to neighborhood-serving retail throughout the county. As stores within (e.g. grocery, pharmacies, and salons) this category continue to decrease overall within every submarket. This finding square footage nationally and e-commerce presents an opportunity for Montgomery trends continue to threaten brick and County to serve as a model within the mortar sales, these retail locations should DC Metropolitan area as a municipality transition into neighborhood-serving retail. that effectively manages its retail stock to maximize the benefit to its constituents. 2. Prioritize the redevelopment of aging 3. Montgomery County should embrace its or outdated retail space. When new diverse retail supply. Montgomery County development is built while existing contains a true wealth of small businesses development is left to age, retail markets Montgomery County Retail Study | Q3 2017 LIMITED GROWTH IN RETAIL DEMAND Throughout Montgomery County, the retail supply compared to demand is generally at equilibrium. The chart below demonstrates supply and demand for each submarket currently, in 2020, and in 2025. Several submarkets, notably Bethesda/Chevy Chase/North Bethesda, Rockville, Silver Spring, and West County, are currently under supplied, while Gaithersburg should reposition a portion of its supply to other street-activating uses such as medical offices, daycares, and office space that opens onto the street. The Bethesda and Rockville submarkets are projected to experience the most substantial demand for growth. The breakdown of demand by retail type can be found in the Submarket Assessments section starting on page 23. Aspen Hill Bethesda/Chevy Chase/North Bethesda East County Gaithersburg Germantown/ Clarksburg Kensington Olney Rockville Silver Spring West County Wheaton- Glenmont White Oak SQUARE FEET 0 500 1M 2M 3M 4M 5M 6M 2016 2020 2025 2016 Demand Demand Demand Supply Montgomery County Retail Study | Q3 2017 This page is intentionally left blank. one INTRODUCTION 2 PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY Retail establishments have a critical impact on The purpose of this study is to: • What national trends are emerging daily life – from providing goods and services that will spur or stall retail growth in to serving as places where residents, office • Identify Montgomery County’s retail Montgomery County? workers, visitors and students intersect on a submarkets from a macro perspective regular basis. that broadly describes its retail • As one of the most desirable environment; retail submarkets in the country, Traditionally, retail space has been an Montgomery County is frequently a afterthought in the planning and development • Document the type, location and first location for retail prototypes. How processes, often added to supplement amount of retail in the county; can the County maintain a balanced other uses or activate the ground level of a supply and demand of retail within • Perform a series of diagnostic building. Among other DC area jurisdictions, each submarket in light of trends assessments of the county’s existing Montgomery County has emerged as a disrupting traditional, brick-and- retail conditions, including submarket- pioneer in using development practices mortar retail environments (such as level analysis of sales and spending; to minimize the oversupply of retail. The e-commerce, transition to retail as connection between sales and need, • Process and evaluate the data entertainment, placemaking, etc.)? ever-changing market conditions, and gathered; Which submarkets will be most the importance of remaining regionally impacted by these changes? competitive in metropolitan Washington, DC • Project future performance given local are all factors that play a role in retail viability and national trends; This study provides information and direction within Montgomery County. for Montgomery County’s stakeholders of • Recommend a series of strategies for every definition to make informed decisions County agencies, developers, property
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Official Statement -- WSSC CPI Bonds 2014
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED APRIL 15, 2014 NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only Fitch Ratings: AAA Moody’s Investors Service: Aaa Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services: AAA See “Ratings” In the opinion of Bond Counsel, (i) under existing law, interest on the Bonds is exempt from taxation by the State of Maryland and its counties and municipalities; no opinion is expressed as to estate or inheritance taxes or any other taxes not levied or assessed directly on the interest on the Bonds; and (ii) assuming compliance with certain covenants described herein, interest on the Bonds will be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations and decisions. Interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes is not includable in the alternative minimum taxable income of individuals, corporations or other taxpayers as an enumerated item of tax preference or other specific adjustment; however, interest on the Bonds may be taken into account in determining “adjusted current earnings” for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax for corporations, and interest on the Bonds will be subject to the branch profits tax imposed on foreign corporations engaged in a trade or business in the United States of America. See “TAX MATTERS.” $197,395,000 WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY DISTRICT, MARYLAND (MONTGOMERY AND PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTIES, MARYLAND) $150,000,000 $47,395,000 Consolidated Public Improvement Consolidated Public Improvement Bonds of 2014 Refunding Bonds of 2014 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: June 1, as shown on the inside front cover Interest Payment Date: June 1 and December 1, beginning December 1, 2014 Denomination: $5,000 or any integral multiples thereof Form: Registered, book-entry only through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company Optional Redemption: The Construction Bonds maturing on or after June 1, 2025 are subject to redemption prior to maturity without premium.
    [Show full text]
  • ADDRESS NAME PERMIT CAMPUS WAY SOUTH , Largo SAKURA
    ADDRESS NAME PERMIT CAMPUS WAY SOUTH , Largo SAKURA HIBACHI AND SUSHI EXPRESS 66465 LAUREL BOWIE RD, BOWIE DANCIA ORIENTAL MART LLC 66206 00 E UNIVERSITY BLVD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UMCP - FOOTNOTES 55245 00 E UNIVERSITY BLVD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UMCP - XFINITY CENTER EVENT LEVEL STANDS & PRES 50888 00 E UNIVERSITY BLVD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UMCP - XFINITY CENTER NORTH CONCOURSE 50890 00 E UNIVERSITY BLVD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UMCP - XFINITY CENTER SOUTH CONCOURSE 50891 00 E UNIVERSITY BLVD, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UMCP - XFINITY PLAZA LEVEL 50892 1 BETHESDA METRO CENTER, BETHESDA STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 66506 1 BETHESDA METRO CTR, BETHESDA MORTON'S THE STEAK HOUSE 50528 1 BETHESDA METRO CTR, GADQ, BETHESDA HYATT REGENCY BETHESDA 53242 1 DISCOVERY PL, SILVER SPRING DELGADOS CAFÉ 64722 1 GRAND CORNER AVE, GAITHERSBURG CORNER BAKERY #120 52127 1 MEDIMMUNE WAY, GAITHERSBURG FLIK INTERNATIONAL CORP @ MEDIMMUNE 56734 1 MEDIMMUNE WAY, GAITHERSBURG MEDIMMUNE CAFE 52313 1 PRESIDENTIAL DR, COLLEGE PARK UMCP-UNIVERSITY HOUSE PRESIDENT'S EVENT CENTER 57082 1 SCHOOL DR, GAITHERSBURG FIELDS ROAD ELEMENTARY 54538 1 WISCONSIN CIR, CHEVY CHASE FROSTING-A-CUPCAKERY 55639 1 YOST PL, CAPITOL HEIGHTS CENTRAL AVENUE RESTAURANT & LIQUOR 50450 10 HIGH ST, BROOKEVILLE SALEM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 54491 10 UPPER ROCK CIRCLE, ROCKVILLE MOM ORGANIC MARKET 65996 10 WATKINS PARK DR, LARGO KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN #5296 50348 100 BOARDWALK PL, GAITHERSBURG COPPER CANYON GRILL 55889 100 EDISON PARK DR, GAITHERSBURG WELL BEING CAFÉ 64892 100 LEXINGTON DR, SILVER
    [Show full text]
  • Westfield Montgomery Mall - Preliminary Plan Amendment 12005018C, Site Plan Amendment 82005003E
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 7/16/20 Westfield Montgomery Mall - Preliminary Plan Amendment 12005018C, Site Plan Amendment 82005003E Troy Leftwich, Planner Coordinator, Area 2 Division, [email protected]., 301-495-4553 Emily Tettelbaum, Planner Coordinator, Area 2 Division, [email protected]., 301-495-4569 Patrick Butler, Planning Supervisor, Area 2 Division, [email protected]., 301-495-4561 Carrie Sanders, Chief, Area 2 Division, [email protected]., 301-495-4653 Completed: 7/6/20 Description Preliminary Plan Amendment: Request for approval of up to 2,896,731 square feet of development, with up to 2,063,302 square feet of commercial uses and up to 833,429 square feet of residential uses (717 dwelling units). Site Plan Amendment: Request to redevelop surface parking lots, reconfigure existing retail, and add a 2-level parking deck for a total of up to 2,819,090 square feet of development, with up to 1,985,661 square feet of commercial up to 833,429 square feet of residential (717 dwelling units). Location : northeast corner of the intersection of Democracy Boulevard and Westlake Drive. Master Plan: 2017 Rock Spring Sector Plan. Zones: GR-1.5 H-45 and Regional Shopping Center Overlay. Size: 59.45 acres. Applicant: Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield. Accepta nce Date: 12/19/18 Review Basis: Chapters 50, 59. Summa ry . Staff recommends approval with conditions. The Applicant proposes a significant mixed-use development of existing surface parking lots on the northern side of the Property including 717 residential units, amenity-rich open spaces, bike lanes, streetscape improvements, and over 150,000 square feet of additional retail.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT for the DISTRICT of DELAWARE ) in Re: ) Chapter 11 ) FOREVER 21, INC., Et Al.,1 ) Case
    Case 19-12122-KG Doc 81 Filed 10/01/19 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) FOREVER 21, INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 19-12122 (KG) ) Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested) ) DEBTORS’ MOTION SEEKING ENTRY OF AN ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO ENTER INTO THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT, (II) APPROVING PROCEDURES FOR STORE CLOSING SALES, AND (III) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”)2 respectfully state as follows in support of this motion (this “Motion”): Relief Requested 1. The Debtors seek entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Order”): (a) authorizing the Debtors to enter into that certain consulting agreement dated as of September 30, 2019 (the “Consulting Agreement”) by and between Forever 21, Inc. and the contractual joint venture comprised of Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC and Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC (the “Consultant”), a copy of which is attached as Annex 1 to 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, include: Forever 21, Inc. (4795); Alameda Holdings, LLC (2379); Forever 21 International Holdings, Inc. (4904); Forever 21 Logistics, LLC (1956); Forever 21 Real Estate Holdings, LLC (4224); Forever 21 Retail, Inc. (7150); Innovative Brand Partners, LLC (7248); and Riley Rose, LLC (6928). The location of the Debtors’ service address is: 3880 N. Mission Road, Los
    [Show full text]
  • White Oak Science Gateway Master Plan Commercial Market Analysis
    East County Science Center Commercial Market Analysis Prepared for: Montgomery County Planning Department Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission May 11, 2011 DRAFT Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... ii I. Corridor History and Current Conditions .............................................................................. 4 Corridor Demographics ........................................................................................................... 7 II. Development Context ............................................................................................................. 8 Lessons Learned from Analogous Development Districts ..................................................... 8 University Connections ........................................................................................................ 8 Business Incubators ............................................................................................................. 9 Development Funding .......................................................................................................... 9 Multitenant Buildings........................................................................................................ 10 Key Success Factors ........................................................................................................... 10 Federal Anchors ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Valley
    MISSION VALLEY GERMANY CentrO - Oberhausen Gera Arcaden - Gera Gropius Passagen - Berlin Höfe am Brühl - Leipzig Minto - Mönchengladbach Palais Vest - Recklinghausen Pasing Arcaden - Munich Paunsdorf Center - Leipzig OUR PORTFOLIO Ring-Center - Berlin Ruhr Park - Bochum Westfield Hamburg- Überseequartier - Hamburg THE NETHERLANDS Citymall Almere - Almere SWEDEN Westfield Mall of Greater Stockholm the Netherlands - Leidschendam Westfield Mall of Scandinavia Stadshart Amstelveen - Amstelveen Nacka Forum SEATTLE Stadshart Zoetermeer - Zoetermeer Solna Centrum Westfield Southcenter Täby Centrum POLAND SAN FRANCISCO AREA Warsaw Westfield Galleria at Roseville UNITED KINGDOM DENMARK Westfield Arkadia Westfield Oakridge CHICAGO London Copenhagen Centrum Ursynów Westfield San Francisco Centre Westfield Old Orchard Westfield Stratford City Fisketorvet Galeria Mokotów Westfield Valley Fair Chicago O’Hare International CONNECTICUT Croydon Galeria Wileńska Westfield Meriden Westfield London Złote Tarasy Westfield Trumbull Wrocław Wroclavia BELGIUM Brussels CZECH REPUBLIC Mall of Europe Prague SLOVAKIA Westfield Chodov NEW YORK AREA Bratislava Bubny Westfield Garden State Plaza Aupark Centrum Černý Most Metropole Zličín Westfield South Shore ITALY Westfield Sunrise Milan Westfield World Trade Center Westfield Milano JFK International AUSTRIA Newark Liberty International Vienna Donau Zentrum Shopping City Süd WASHINGTON D.C. AREA Westfield Annapolis Westfield Montgomery Westfield Wheaton SPAIN FRANCE UNITED STATES Benidorm - Benidorm Westfield Carré Sénart - Greater Paris
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Retail Planning Study
    Appendix D: Retail Planning Study In 2013, the Montgomery County Planning Department and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC) initiated an effort to update its 1994 Bethesda Central Business District Plan. As a component, the project team sought a retail study to address: • the relative positioning of each district’s existing retail and future needs (over 20 years) to identify market supportable strategies to improve the area’s retail environment; • the phasing of retail for build out to guide the formation of development, zoning, and growth policies, and develop synergies with other land use functions; and, • the strategies to improve conditions for existing retailers and eliminate any obstacles that might dissuade tenants from locating in any of the study areas. Streetsense and BAE Urban Economics – two local consulting firms – undertook this study and planning document. The project kicked-off in August 2014. The work effort to complete the Retail Planning Strategy for the Bethesda Downtown Plan included extensive field survey, data analysis, market analysis, and observation of specific conditions existent in each of Bethesda Downtown’s subdistricts. The following document provides a clear direction for Bethesda’s retail future. RETAIL PLANNING STRATEGY FOR THE DOWNTOWN BETHESDA PLAN BETHESDA, MD | SEPTEMBER 2014 2 Information conveyed, data gathered and analyzed, and recommendations made within this report are intended to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. The content presented
    [Show full text]
  • Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets® the Simon Experience — Where Brands & Communities Come Together
    LEESBURG CORNER PREMIUM OUTLETS® THE SIMON EXPERIENCE — WHERE BRANDS & COMMUNITIES COME TOGETHER More than real estate, we are a company of experiences. For our guests, we provide distinctive shopping, dining and entertainment. For our retailers, we offer the unique opportunity to thrive in the best retail real estate in the best markets. From new projects and redevelopments to acquisitions and mergers, we are continuously evaluating our portfolio to enhance the Simon experience - places where people choose to shop and retailers want to be. We deliver: SCALE Largest global owner of retail real estate including Malls, Simon Premium Outlets® and The Mills® QUALITY Iconic, irreplaceable properties in great locations INVESTMENT Active portfolio management increases productivity and returns GROWTH Core business and strategic acquisitions drive performance EXPERIENCE Decades of expertise in development, ownership, and management That’s the advantage of leasing with Simon. PROPERTY OVERVIEW LEESBURG CORNER PREMIUM OUTLETS® LEESBURG, VA LEESBURG CORNER PREMIUM OUTLETS LEESBURG, VA 15 7 Leesburg For t E MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS SELECT TENANTS vans Gaithersburg Rd. White's 107 15 Ferry (Bypass) Tysons Corner: 23 miles Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5TH, adidas, Ann Taylor Factory Store, Armani D u S 15 y 270 l c Frederick Exit 1B l Take 2nd right es o l Exit 15N l G i 28 n r Washington, D.C.: 35 miles Outlet, Banana Republic Factory Store, Barneys New York Warehouse, ee R 7 n d . Leesburg w Rockville 95 ayr Baltimore, MD: 75 miles Brooks Brothers Factory Store, Burberry, Calvin Klein Company Store, Baltimore Pot om acR Coach Factory Outlet, DKNY Company Store, Elie Tahari Outlet, HUGO D iver u ll es BOSS Factory Store, J.Crew Factory, Jones New York, kate spade new G RETAIL r ee york, LACOSTE Outlet, Michael Kors Outlet, Nautica, NikeFactoryStore, nw ay 7 GLA (sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarksburg, Maryland
    CLARKSBURG, MARYLAND PROPERTY OVERVIEW CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS® JOINT VENTURE WITH NEW ENGLAND DEVELOPMENT CLARKSBURG, MD MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS SELECT TENANTS Frederick Baltimore: 47 miles Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5TH, Banana Republic Factory Store, Coach, 70 Washington, D.C.: 34 miles kate spade new york, Michael Kors, NikeFactoryStore, Polo Ralph Lauren Baltimore Factory Store, Steve Madden, Tory Burch, Under Armour Clarksburg RETAIL 270 Columbia TOURISM / TRAFFIC 95 GLA (sq. ft.) 390,000; 90 stores Clarksburg Premium Outlets is a LEED certified center and the first OPENING DATES bi-level Premium Outlets in the United States. Clarksburg is located in the very affluent and densely populated Washington, D.C. suburbs of Opened October 2016 Montgomery County, MD. The county has a population of over one Washington million people, and is the 10th wealthiest county in the U.S., second wealthiest county in the U.S. of counties with over one million people. RADIUS POPULATION Additionally, the site is within 30 miles of four of the top ten wealthiest 15 miles: 700,726 counties in the U.S. (Montgomery, Howard, Loudoun and Fairfax). CLARKSBURG PREMIUM OUTLETS 30 miles: 4,285,461 Montgomery County borders the nation’s capital of Washington, D.C., CLARKSBURG, MD 45 miles: 8,020,590 which had approximately 20.2 million tourists in 2014. The site is located on the I-270 Technology Corridor (a 12-lane highway), AVERAGE HH INCOME a hub for federal government agencies such as National Institute of Health, 30 miles: $122,657 National Cancer Institute, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Department of Energy and Department of Health and Human Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Record
    Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF PAYLESS SHOESOURCE CANADA INC. AND PAYLESS SHOESOURCE CANADA GP INC. (the “Applicants”) APPLICATION RECORD February 19, 2019 Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Ryan Jacobs LSO#: 59510J Tel: 416. 860.6465 Fax: 416. 640.3189 [email protected] Jane Dietrich LSO#: 49302U Tel : 416. 860.5223 Fax : 416. 640.3144 [email protected] Natalie E. Levine LSO#: 64980K Tel : 416. 860.6568 Fax : 416. 640.3207 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless ShoeSource Canada Inc., Payless ShoeSource Canada GP Inc. and Payless ShoeSource Canada LP TO: SERVICE LIST ATTACHED LEGAL*47453748.1 SERVICE LIST TO: Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West, Suite 2100 Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 Ryan Jacobs Tel: 416.860.6465 Fax: 416.640.3189 [email protected] Jane Dietrich Tel: 416.860.5223 Fax: 416.640.3144 [email protected] Natalie E. Levine Tel: 416.860.6568 Fax: 416.640.3207 [email protected] Monique Sassi Tel: 416.860.6572 Fax: 416.642.7150 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless ShoeSource Canada Inc., Payless ShoeSource Canada GP Inc. and Payless ShoeSource Canada LP, (collectively, the “Payless Canada Entities”) LEGAL*47453748.1 AND TO: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036-6745 Ira Dizengoff Tel: 212.872.1096 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Meredith Lahaie Tel: 212.872.8032 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Kevin Zuzolo Tel: 212.872.7471 Fax: 212.872.1002 [email protected] Julie Thompson Tel: 202.887.4516 Fax: 202.887.4288 [email protected] Lawyers for Payless Holdings LLC and its debtor affiliates AND TO: FTI Consulting Canada Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • CAM (Central American Minors) Parolee Resource Guide Maryland
    CAM (Central American Minors) Parolee Resource Guide Maryland Important Notes: This resource guide was prepared for advocates who assist CAM parolees. This guide provides a general overview of the types of benefits that CAM parolees may qualify for and locates helpful resources and services within each region. It is not an exhaustive guide. Particular circumstances of a client (e.g., pregnancy, HIV/AIDs, domestic violence, etc.) may qualify them for additional benefits that are not covered in this overview. This guide also includes references to “undocumented individuals” in case it is relevant to the CAM parolees’ other family members. To be clear, CAM parolees and their parent(s) are “documented.” CAM parolees have status under INA § 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5) (discretionary parole for “urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit”) and at least one of their parents must have had status (e.g., Temporary Protective Status/TPS or Lawful Permanent Resident/LPR, etc. ) to have been eligible for the CAM program. Information in this resource guide is not intended as, nor should it be considered, legal advice. Information in this guide is subject to change and should be verified with state and local agencies to ensure accuracy. That an organization, agency, or a program is listed in this resource guide does not imply an endorsement by either IRAP or IRC. About CAM Parolees and this Guide CAM parolees are minors from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras who had a parent lawfully present in the United States, and who, while still in their home country, applied for the Central American Minors (CAM) program to be considered for refugee resettlement in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • NCI Summer Curriculum in Cancer Prevention
    NCI Summer Curriculum in Cancer Prevention Neuroscience Center Building (NSC) 6001 Executive Boulevard Conference Rooms C & D Rockville, Maryland 20852 (+1) 301-435-1470 (Lobby/Security) Updated: November 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Regional Overview ............................................................................................................................ - 3 - Specific Information ......................................................................................................................... - 4 - AIRPORTS .................................................................................................................................. - 4 - BANKING................................................................................................................................... - 5 - HOUSING .................................................................................................................................. - 5 - GROCERY STORES ..................................................................................................................... - 7 - HEALTH CARE AND HOSPITALS ................................................................................................. - 8 - MOVIE THEATERS ..................................................................................................................... - 8 - NEWSPAPERS ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]